@ARTICLE{Kulczycki_Emanuel_Scholarly_2019,
 author={Kulczycki, Emanuel},
 number={No 2},
 journal={Nauka},
 pages={29-45},
 howpublished={online},
 year={2019},
 publisher={Biuro Upowszechniania i Promocji Nauki PAN},
 abstract={The aim of this paper is twofold. Firstly, I present the scholarly book publications patterns of Polish scholars. Secondly, I show how scholarly book publications are assessed in various European research evaluation systems. Moreover, I argue that the diversity of evaluation models depends on the scientific policy aims in a given country. This presentation of European models allows me to discuss a new Polish science policy instrument, that is the list of publishers prepared for the upcoming evaluation exercise in 2021. In 2018, the Ministry of Science and Higher Education in Poland implemented a new model of scholarly book publication assessment based on the list of publishers. On the one hand, such a science policy instrument might be a way to appreciate the best quality scholarly books and give them more points than articles in the evaluation exercise. On the other hand, it is a so far unknown instrument which differentiates publications that have been treated the same up to date. Additionally, this paper aims to shed some light on how the new Polish model was prepared.},
 type={Artykuły / Articles},
 title={Scholarly book publications in European research evaluation systems},
 URL={http://journals.pan.pl/Content/110106/PDF/N%23219-03-Kulczycki.pdf},
 doi={10.24425/nauka.2019.126190},
 keywords={research evaluation, scholarly books, monographs, publication patterns},
}