@ARTICLE{Dobrzeniecki_Marek_The_2019, author={Dobrzeniecki, Marek}, number={No 1}, journal={Przegląd Filozoficzny. Nowa Seria}, pages={17-32}, howpublished={online}, year={2019}, publisher={Komitet Nauk Filozoficznych PAN}, publisher={Wydział Filozofii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego}, abstract={The paper summarizes the debate concerning the divine hiddenness argument. First, it presents two versions of the argument that was initially formulated by J.L. Schellenberg and subsequently discussed over the last twenty years and it marks its most important theses. Then the author indicates some possible rebuttals, segregating them according to the challenged premises. Particularly noteworthy, he argues, are these theistic answers that accuse the images of God assumed by the hiddenness argument of excessive anthropomorphism and those that try to point out higher goods justifying divine hiddenness. In conclusion the author claims that the hiddenness argument proves atheism only if by theism one understands theistic personalism. Other positions, such as ultimism or theism of transcendence, are not threatened by the argument.}, type={Artykuły / Articles}, title={The divine hiddenness argument. The state of debate}, URL={http://journals.pan.pl/Content/110516/PDF/P.Filoz.%201-19%202-M.Dobrzeniecki.pdf}, doi={10.24425/pfns.2019.126632}, keywords={hiddenness argument, theism, atheism, ultimism, theistic personalism, freewill defence, J.L. Schellenberg}, }