TitleLethal Effects of Spinosad on Chrysoperla Carnea Larvae (Neuroptera: Chrisopidae) Under Laboratory Conditions
Journal titleJournal of Plant Protection Research
Divisions of PASNauki Biologiczne i Rolnicze
4 issues per year.
The online version of Journal of Plant Protection Research (JPPR) is the original one.
Rejection rate – over 70%.
Journal of Plant Protection Research is an international peer-reviewed journal that publishes original papers, rapid communications, reviews, covering all areas of plant protection. Subjects include phytopathological virology, bacteriology, mycology and applied nematology and entomology as well as topics on protecting crop plants and stocks of crop products against diseases, viruses, weeds etc.
The Journal is published by Institute of Plant Protection – National Research Institute and Committee on Agronomic Sciences of the Polish Academy of Sciences. By 1997 under the title Prace Naukowe Instytutu Ochrony Roślin and Annals of Agricultural Sciences - Series E - Plant Protection).
JPPR publishes original research papers, rapid communications, critical reviews, and book reviews covering all areas of modern plant protection. Subjects include phytopathological virology, bacteriology, mycology and applied nematology and entomology as well as topics on protecting crop plants and stocks of crop products against diseases, viruses, weeds etc. We publish papers which use an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into pest management programmes, which cover high and low input agricultural systems worldwide, within the framework of ecologically sound and economically responsible land cultivation.
Relevant topics include: advanced methods of diagnostic, and computer-assisted diagnostic plant research and new findings, biological methods of plant protection, selective chemical methods of plant protection, the effects of plant-protecting agents and their toxicology, methods to induce and utilize crop resistance, application techniques, and economic aspects of plant protection.
Journal of Plant Protection Research is also available on:
The Journal does not have article processing charges (APCs) nor article submission charges.
Journal of Plant Protection Research is published based on the Open Access model.
JPPR is a member of CrossRef – the citation-linking backbone for online publications.
JPPR is indexed/abstracted in:
AGRICOLA, AGRIS, AGRO, BIOSIS Preview, CABI, Chemical Abstracts Services (CAS), DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals), EBSCO, FSTA - Food Science & Technology Abstracts, Geobase, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), J-Gate, JournalGuide, JournalTOCs, KESLI-NDSL (Korean National Discovery for Science Leaders), Microsoft Academic, Naviga (Softweco), Paperbase, Pirabase, POL-index, Polish Scientific Journals Contents, Polymer Library, Primo Central (ExLibris), ProQuest (relevant databases), Publons, ReadCube, SCOPUS, Sherpa/RoMEO, Summon (Serials Solutions/ProQuest), TDNet, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory/ulrichsweb, WanFang Data, WorldCat (OCLC), Zoological Record.
It is also ranked in SCImago Journal & Country Rank in three categories: Agronomy and Crop Science – Q2, Plant Science – Q2, and Soil Science – Q2 (June 2017).
PublisherInstitute of Plant Protection – National Research Institute ; Committee of Plant Protection PAS
IdentifierISSN 1427–4345 ; eISSN 1899–007X
ReferencesAbbott W. (1925), A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide, J. Econ. Entomol, 18, 265. ; Bret B. (1997), Biological properties of Spinosad, Down to Earth, 52, 6. ; Cisneros J. (2002), Toxic effects of Spinosad on predatory insects, Biol. Control, 23, 15. ; Cleveland C. (2001), An ecological risk assessment for spinosad use on cotton, Pest Manage. Sci, 58, 70. ; Copping L. (2000), Biopesticides: A review of their action, applications and efficacy, Pest Manage. Sci, 56, 651. ; Croft B. (1990), Arthropod Biological Control Agents and Pesticides, 723. ; Crouse G. (2001), Recent advances in the chemistry of spinosyns, Pest Manage. Sci, 57, 177. ; Elzen G. (2000), Lethal and sublethal effects of selected insecticides and an insect growth regulator on the boll weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) ectoparasitoid <i>Catolaccus grandis</i> (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), J. Econ. Entomol, 93, 300. ; Elzen G. (2001), Lethal and sublethal effects of insecticide residues on <i>Orius insidiosus</i> (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) and <i>Geocoris punctipes</i> (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae), J. Econ. Entomol, 94, 55. ; Galvan T. (2005), Toxicity of commonly used insecticides in sweet corn and soybean to multicolored Asian lady beetle (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), J. Econ. Entomol, 98, 3, 780. ; Harris J. (2000), Chemical Pesticide Markets, Health Risks and Residues, 54. ; Hutchison W. (2004), Insect Pest Management, 247. ; Martinson T. (2001), Compatibility of chemical disease and insect management practices used in New York vineyards with biological control by <i>Anagrus</i> spp. (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae), parasitoids of <i>Erythroneura</i> leafhoppers, Biol. Control, 22, 227. ; Medina P. (2001), Activity of Spinosad, Tebufenozide and Azadirachtin on eggs and pupae of the predator <i>Chrysoperla carnea</i> (Stephens) under laboratory conditions, Biocontrol Sci. Technol, 11, 597. ; Miles M. (2000), Spinosad — a naturally derived insect control agent with potential for use in integrated pest management systems in greenhouses, null, 339. ; Mori K. (2001), Effects of pesticides on thespider mite predators, <i>Scolothrips takahashii</i> (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and <i>Stethorus japonicus</i> (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), Int. J. Acarol, 27, 299. ; National Research Council. 1996. Ecologically Based Pest Management: New Solutions for a New Century. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 144 pp. ; Rimoldi F. (2008), Susceptibility of <i>Chrysoperla externa</i> eggs (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) to conventional and biorational insecticides, Environ. Entomol, 37, 5, 1252. ; Salgado V. (1998), Studies on the mode of action of Spinosad: insect symptoms and physiological correlates, Pest. Biochem. Physiol, 60, 91. ; SAS Institute Inc. 2000. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Release 8.01 edition. Cary, North Carolina, USA. ; Schneider M. (2004), Action of insect growth regulator insecticides and spinosad on life history parameters and absorption in third-instar larvae of the endoparasitoid Hyposoter didymator, Biol. Control, 31, 189. ; SPSS. 1999. SPSS v. 10 User's Guide. SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL. ; Stark J. (1995), Limitations to use of topical toxicity data for predictions of pesticide side effects in the field, J. Econ. Entomol, 88, 1081. ; Symondson W. (2002), Can generalist predators be effective biocontrol agents? Annu, Rev. Entomol, 47, 561. ; Thompson G. (1999), Spinosad, Pestic. Outlook, 10, 78. ; Tillman P. (2000), Effect of selected insecticides on the natural enemies <i>Coleomegilla maculata</i> and <i>Hippodamia convergens</i> (Coleoptera: Coccinelidae), <i>Geocoris punctipes</i> (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae), and <i>Bracon mellitor, Cardiochiles nigriceps</i>, and <i>Cotesia marginiventris</i> (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in cotton, J. Econ. Entomol, 93, 1638. ; Wanner K. (2000), Laboratory and field evaluation of Spinosad against the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar, Pest Manage. Sci, 56, 855. ; Williams T. (2003), Is the naturally derived insecticide Spinosad compatible with insect natural enemies? Biocontrol Sci, Tech, 13, 459. ; Viñuela E. (1998), Spinosad and azadirachtin: effects of two naturally derived pesticides on the predatory bug <i>Podisus maculiventris</i> (Say) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) [In Spanish], Boletín Sanidad Vegetal Plagas, 24, 57. ; Vogt H. (2000), Guidelines to Evaluate Side-Effects of Plant Protection Products to Non-Target Arthropods, 27. ; Xian-Hui Y. (2008), Sublethal effects of spinosad on <i>Plutella xylostella</i> (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae), Crop Protect, 27, 1385.