Details

Title

Weed Competitiveness and Herbicidal Sensitivity of Grafted Tomatoes (Solanum Lycopersicon Mill.)

Journal title

Journal of Plant Protection Research

Yearbook

2010

Numer

No 3

Publication authors

Divisions of PAS

Nauki Biologiczne i Rolnicze

Publisher

Polish Society of Plant Protection ; Committee of Plant Protection PAS ; Institute of Plant Protection – National Research Institute

Date

2010

Identifier

eISSN 1899–007X ; ISSN 1427–4345

References

Abu-Irmaileh B. (2000), Weeds of Cultivated Fields, 4. ; Al-Khatib K. (1997), Differential varietal response of green pea (<i>Pisum sativum</i>) to metribuzin, Weed Technol, 11, 3, 775. ; Besri M. (2003), Tomato grafting as an alternative to methyl bromide in Morocco, null, 12. ; Besri M. (2005), Current situation of tomato grafting as alternative to methyl bromide for tomato production in the Mediterranean region, null, 47. ; Bunnell B. (2003), Differential response of five bahiagrass (<i>Paspalum notatum</i>) cultivars to metsulfuron, Weed Technol, 17, 3, 550. ; Dear B. (1995), Differential tolerance of <i>Trifolium subterraneum</i> L. (subterranean clover) cultivars to broadleaf herbicides 1. Herbage yield, Aust. J. Exp. Agric, 35, 4, 467. ; El-Mougy N. (2008), Furfural approaches as control measures against root rot and root-knot incidence of tomato under greenhouse and field conditions, J. Plant Protection Res, 48, 1, 93. ; N. Fernández Garcia (2002), Water and nutrient uptake of grafted tomato plants grown under saline conditions, J. Plant Physiol, 159, 8, 899. ; Fortino J. (1974), Response of tomato to metribuzin, Weed Sci, 22, 5, 460. ; Glaze N. (1988), Weed control in direct-seeded tomato, <i>Lycopersicon esculentum</i>, for transplants, Weed Technol, 2, 333. ; Karajeh M. (2008), Interaction of root-knot nematode (<i>Meloidogyne javanica</i>) and tomato as affected by hydrogen peroxide, J. Plant Protection Res, 48, 2, 181. ; Kazinczi G. (2007), Early competition between tomato and <i>Convolvulus arvensis</i> in additive experiment, Cereal Res. Commun, 35, 2, 601. ; Khah E. (2006), Effect of grafting on growth and yield of tomato (<i>Lycopersicon esculentum</i> Mill.) in greenhouse and open-field, J. Appl. Hortic, 8, 1, 3. ; Khresat S. (1998), Morphological, physical, and chemical properties of selected soils in the arid and semi-arid region in Northestrern Jordan, J. Arid Environ, 40, 1, 15. ; Lee M. (1994), Cultivation of grafted vegetables I, current status, grafting methods and benefits, HortScience, 29, 2, 235. ; Lucier G. (2000), Factors Affecting Tomato Consumption in the United States, USDA's Economic Research Service, November, 2000, 26. ; Marsic N. (2004), The influence of grafting on yield of two tomato cultivars (<i>Lycopersicon esculentum</i> Mill.) grown in plastic house, Acta Agric. Slovenica, 83, 2, 243. ; McAvoy R. (2005), Grafting techniques for greenhouse tomatoes, commercial vegetable and fruit crops newsletter, University of Connecticut Cooperative Extension System and Department of Plant Science, 1, 1. ; McGiffen M. (1992), Competition for light between tomatoes and nightshades (<i>Solanum nigrum</i> or <i>S. ptycanthum</i>), Weed Sci, 40, 220. ; Milton E. (1992), Competition for light between tomatoes and nightshades (<i>Solanum nigrum</i> or <i>S. ptycanthum</i>), Weed Sci, 40, 2, 220. ; Monaco T. (1981), Influence of four weed species on the growth, yield, and quality of direct-seeded tomatoes (<i>Lycopersicon esculentum</i>), Weed Sci, 29, 4, 394. ; Monaco T. (2002), Weed Science: Principles and Practices, 700. ; Montanya S. (2006), Competition for nitrogen between thorn apple and tomato and pepper, J. Plant Nutr, 29, 3, 565. ; Ngouajio M. (2001), Tolerance of tomato cultivars to velvetleaf interference, Weed Sci, 49, 1, 91. ; Porterfeild D. (2002), Weed-free yield response of seven cotton (<i>Gossypium hirsutum</i>) cultivars to CGA-362622 post-emergence, Weed Technol, 16, 180. ; Qaryouti M. (2007), Tomato fruit yield and quality as affected by grafting and growing system, Acta Hortic, 41, 2, 199. ; Radosevich S. (1997), Weed Ecology: Implications for Management, 589. ; SAS Institute. 1989. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6. 4th ed., Vol. 2. Cary, NC, SAS Institute. ; Senseman S. (2007), Herbicide Handbook, 515. ; Stephenson G. (1976), Differential tolerance of tomato cultivars to metribuzin, Weed Sci, 24, 2, 161. ; Szpyrka E. (2009), Disappearance of azoxystrobin, cyprodinil, and fludioxonil residues on tomato leaves in a greenhouse, J. Plant Protection Res, 49, 2, 204. ; Tei F. (2003), Weeds and weed management in processing tomato, Acta Hortic, 613, 1, 111, doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.613.13 ; Weaver S. (1987), Estimating yield losses of tomatoes (<i>Lycopersicon esculentum</i>) caused by nightshade (<i>Solanum</i> spp.) interference, Weed Sci, 35, 1, 163. ; Zhao D. (2006), Cultivar weed-competitiveness in aerobic rice: heritability, correlated traits, and the potential for indirect selection in weed-free environments, Crop Sci, 46, 1, 372.

DOI

10.2478/v10045-010-0053-x

×