Szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Which One to Choose Multi Focus or Trade-Off Among Competitive Priorities? Evidence from Finnish SMEs

Tytuł czasopisma

Management and Production Engineering Review

Rocznik

2016

Numer

No 1

Autorzy publikacji

Wydział PAN

Nauki Techniczne

Wydawca

Production Engineering Committee of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Polish Association for Production Management

Data

2016

Identyfikator

eISSN 2082-1344 ; ISSN 2080-8208

Referencje

Kipley (2012), Entropy - disrupting Ansoff s five levels of environmental turbulence Strategy Series, Business, 13, 251. ; González (2010), da The environment as a determining factor of purchasing and supply strategy : An empirical analysis of Brazilian firms, International Journal of Production Economics, 124, 1, doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.08.032 ; Lasagni (2012), How can external relationships enhance innovation in SMEs ? New evidence for Europe *, Journal of Small Business Management, 50, 310, doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012.00355.x ; Emery (1965), The Causal Texture of Organizational Environments, Human Relations, 18, 21, doi.org/10.1177/001872676501800103 ; Kathuria (2000), Competitive priorities and managerial performance : a taxonomy of small manufacturers, Journal of Operations Management, 18, 627, doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00042-5 ; Andreeva (2012), Does knowledge management really matter ? Linking knowledge management practices competitiveness and economic performance of, Journal Knowledge Management, 16, 617, doi.org/10.1108/13673271211246185 ; Hardwick (1998), The competitiveness of EU insurance industries, Service Industries Journal, 18, 39, doi.org/10.1080/02642069800000003 ; Amoako (2007), Examining cumulative capabilities in a developing economy, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 68, 928, doi.org/10.1108/01443570710775801 ; Takala (2002), Analysing and synthesising multifocused manufacturing strategies by analytical hierarchy process of Manufacturing Technology and Management, International Journal, 4, 345. ; Mithas (2011), How information management capability influences firm performance, MIS quarterly, 35, 237. ; Lawrence (2007), Small business operations strategy : Aligning priorities and resources of, Journal Small Business Strategy, 18, 89. ; Balkyte (2010), Perception of competitiveness in the context of sustainable development : facets of sustainable competitiveness, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 11, 341, doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2010.17 ; Castellacci (2008), Innovation and the competitiveness of industries : Comparing the mainstream and the evolutionary approaches, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75, 984, doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2007.09.002 ; Mintzberg (1994), The fall and rise of strategic planning, Harvard Business Review, 72, 107. ; Buckley (1988), Measures of international competitiveness : A critical survey *, Journal of Marketing Management, 4, 175, doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.1988.9964068 ; Man (2002), The competitiveness of small and medium enterprises : A conceptualization with focus on entrepreneurial competencies, Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 123, doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00058-6 ; Corbett (1993), Trade - offs ? What trade - offs ? Competence and competitiveness in manufacturing strategy, California Management Review, 35, 107, doi.org/10.2307/41166757 ; Wright (2005), Strategy in emerging economies : Challenging the conventional wisdom *, Journal of Management Studies, 42, 1, doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00487.x ; Parnell (2000), Strategy as a response to organizational uncertainty : An alternative perspective on the strategy - performance relationship, Management Decision, 38, 520, doi.org/10.1108/00251740010352811 ; Huggins (2003), Creating a UK Competitiveness Index : Regional and Local Benchmarking, Regional Studies, 37, 89, doi.org/10.1080/0034340022000033420 ; Chi (2010), Corporate competitive strategies in a transitional manufacturing industry : An empirical study, Management Decision, 48, 976, doi.org/10.1108/00251741011053497 ; Chi (2009), Measurement of business environment characteristics in the US technical textile industry : An empirical study The, Journal of the Textile Institute, 100, 545, doi.org/10.1080/00405000802078783 ; Hallgren (2011), A hybrid model of competitive capabilities, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31, 511, doi.org/10.1108/01443571111126300 ; Xiaosong (2011), Competitive priorities plant improvement and innovation capabilities and operational performance : A test of two forms of fit, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31, 484, doi.org/10.1108/01443571111126292 ; Ajitabh (2004), Competitiveness of firms : Review of Theory Frameworks and Models, Singapore management Review, 26, 45. ; Chae (2014), Information technology capability and firm performance : Contradictory findings and their possible causes, Mis Quarterly, 38, 305. ; Kocabasoglu (2007), Linking forward and reverse supply chain investments : the role of business uncertainty, Journal of Operations Management, 25, 1141, doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.015 ; Cerrato (2011), Unbundling the construct of firm - level international competitiveness, Multinational Business Review, 19, 311, doi.org/10.1108/15253831111190162 ; Rosenzweig (2010), Tradeoffs in Manufacturing ? A Meta - Analysis and Critique of the Literature, Production and Operations Management, 19, 127, doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2009.01072.x ; Commander (2011), Business environment exports ownership and firm performance The, Review of Economics and Statistics, 93, 309, doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00135 ; Feurer (1994), Defining competitiveness : A holistic approach, Management Decision, 32, 49, doi.org/10.1108/00251749410054819 ; Ward (1995), Business environment operations strategy and performance : An empirical study of Singapore manufacturers, Journal of Operations Management, 13, 99, doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(95)00021-J ; Selznick (1948), Foundations of the theory of organization, American Sociological Review, 13, 25, doi.org/10.2307/2086752 ; Chang (1995), Competitiveness of product firm industry and nation in a global business Competitiveness Review : An International, Business Journal, 5, 37. ; Ling (2000), Manufacturing capability development in a changing business environment, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 100, 261, doi.org/10.1108/02635570010301188 ; Tracey (1999), Manufacturing technology and strategy formulation : keys to enhancing competitiveness and improving performance, Journal of Operations Management, 17, 411, doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00045-X ; Álvarez (2009), The role of networking in the competitiveness of firms, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76, 410, doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.10.002 ; Child (1972), Organization structure environment and performance : The role of strategic choice, Sociology, 6, 1, doi.org/10.1177/003803857200600101 ; Prajogo (2011), Examining competitive priorities and competitive advantage in service organisations using Importance - Performance Analysis matrix Managing Service Quality : An, International Journal, 21, 465. ; Bourgeois (1981), On the measurement of organizational slack, Academy of Management Review, 6, 29. ; Santos (2012), How organizational learning affects a firm s flexibility competitive strategy and performance, Journal of Business Research, 65, 1079, doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.09.002 ; Santa (2010), Contribution of cross - functional teams to the improvement in operational performance Team Performance Management : An, international Journal, 16, 148. ; Yee (2012), The influence of quality marketing and knowledge capabilities in business competitiveness of Innovation and Learning, International Journal, 11, 288. ; Barney (1991), Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of management, 17, 99, doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108 ; Kroes (2010), Outsourcing congruence with competitive priorities : Impact on supply chain and firm performance, Journal of Operations Management, 28, 124, doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.09.004 ; Rosenbusch (2013), The Mediating Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation in the Task Environment - Performance Relationship : A Meta - Analysis, Journal of Management, 39, 633, doi.org/10.1177/0149206311425612 ; Boyer (2002), Competitive priorities : investigating the need for trade - offs in operations strategy Production and, operations management, 11, 9. ; Duncan (1972), Characteristicsof organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainties, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 313, doi.org/10.2307/2392145 ; Makkonen (2014), Dynamic capabilities and firm performance in a financial crisis, Journal of Business Research, 67, 2707, doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.03.020 ; Venkatraman (1989), The concept of fit in strategy research : Toward verbal and statistical correspondence, Academy of Management Review, 14, 423. ; Cachon (2011), The value of fast fashion : Quick response enhanced design and strategic consumer behavior, Management Science, 57, 778, doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1303 ; Momaya (2011), Cooperation for competitiveness of emerging countries : learning from a case of nanotechnology Competitiveness Review : An International, Business Journal, 21, 152. ; Horne (1992), Understanding the competitive process a guide to effective intervention in the small firms sector, European Journal of Operational Research, 56, 54, doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(92)90292-H ; Theodosiou (2012), Strategic orientations marketing capabilities and firm performance : An empirical investigation in the context of frontline managers in service organizations, Industrial Marketing Management, 41, 1058, doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.01.001 ; Miller (1994), A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies, Management Science, 40, 285, doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.3.285 ; Hashi (2013), The impact of innovation activities on firm performance using a multi - stage model : Evidence from the Community Innovation Survey, Research Policy, 42, 353, doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.011

DOI

10.1515/mper-2016-0009

×