Details

Title

Effect of sperm concentration in an ejaculate on morphometric traits of spermatozoa in Duroc boars

Journal title

Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences

Yearbook

2011

Numer

No 1

Publication authors

Divisions of PAS

Nauki Biologiczne i Rolnicze

Publisher

Polish Academy of Sciences Committee of Veterinary Sciences ; University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn

Date

2011

Identifier

ISSN 1505-1773

References

N Azis (1998), Human sperm head morphometric distribution and its influence on human fertility, Fertil and Steril, 70, 883, doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00317-3 ; D Banaszewska (2009), Effect of sperm concentration on ejaculate for morphometric traits of spermatozoas of the pietrain breed boars, J Cent Eur Agric, 10, 383. ; J Bierła (2007), Sperm morphology of the Eurasian beaver Castor fiber: an example of a species of rodent with highly derived and pleiomorphic sperm populations, J Morphol, 268, 683, doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10544 ; E Blom (1981), The morphological estimation of the spermatozoa defects of bull II. The proposal of new classification of spermatozoa defects (in Polish), Med Weter, 37, 239. ; L Brito (2007), Evaluation of stallion sperm morphology, Clin Tech Equine Pract, 6, 249, doi.org/10.1053/j.ctep.2007.09.004 ; M Castro (1996), Influence of the collection period on volume, motility and semen doses in swine, Ciencia Rural, 26, 457. ; P Casey (1997), Morphometric differences in sperm head dimensions of fertile and subfertile stallions, Theriogenology, 47, 575, doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(97)00015-0 ; P Chenoweth (2005), Genetic sperm defects, Theriogenology, 64, 457, doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.05.005 ; R Davis (1993), Automated morphometric analysis of stallion spermatozoa, Am J Vet Res, 54, 1808. ; J De Jarnette (1992), Accessory sperm: their importance to fertility and embryo quality, and attempts to alter their numbers in artificially inseminated cattle, J Anim Sci, 70, 484, doi.org/10.2527/1992.702484x ; A De Vos (2003), Influence of individual sperm morphology on fertilization, embryo morphology, and pregnancy outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection, Fertility and Sterility, 79, 42, doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(02)04571-5 ; A Downing-Meisner (2005), Sperm head morphology in 36 species of artiodactylans, perissodactylans, and cetaceans (Mammalia), J Morphol, 263, 179, doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10297 ; M Gage (2003), Experimental evidence for the evolution of numerous, tiny sperm via sperm competition, Curr Biol, 13, 754, doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00282-3 ; M Gil (2009), Morphometry of porcine spermatozoa and its functional significance in relation with the motility parameters in fresh semen, Theriogenology, 71, 254, doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.07.007 ; M Gomendio (1991), Sperm competition influences sperm size in mammals, Proc Biol Sci, 243, 181, doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1991.0029 ; C Gravance (1996), Quantification of normal head morphometry of stallion spermatozoa, J Reprod Fertil, 108, 41, doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.1080041 ; M Hirai (2001), Objectively measured sperm motility and sperm head morphometry in boars (Sus scrofa): relation to fertility and seminal plasma growth factors, J Androl, 22, 104. ; D Katz (1986), Morphometric analysis of spermatozoa in the assessment of human male fertility, J Androl, 7, 203. ; D Katz (1990), Analysis and interpretation of the forces generated by spermatozoa, null, 125. ; D Karabinus (1997), Chromatin structural changes in sperm after scrotal insulation of Holstein bulls, J Androl, 18, 549. ; G King (1973), A comparison of two methods for boar semen collection, J Anim Sci, 36, 563. ; S Kondracki (2003), Breed differences in semen characteristics of boars used in artificial insemination in Poland, Pig News Inf, 24. ; S Kondracki (2005), The effect of age on the morphometric sperm traits of domestic pigs, Cell Mol Biol Lett, 10, 3. ; S Kondracki (2005), Characterization of sperm abnormalities of Boars with regard of age and breed (in Polish), Folia Univ Agric Stetin, Zootechnica, 243, 97. ; S Kondracki (2006), Ejaculate traits and spermatozoa morphology as related to spermatozoa concentration in ejaculates of Polish Large White boars, Anim Sci Pap and Rep, 24, 111. ; S Lüpold (2009), Sperm morphology and sperm velocity in passerine birds, Proc Biol Sci, 276, 1175, doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1645 ; A Malo (2006), Sperm design and sperm function, Biol Lett, 2, 246, doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2006.0449 ; A Maroto-Morales (2010), Characterization of ram (Ovis aries) sperm head morphometry using the Sperm-Class Analyzer, Theriogenology, 73, 437, doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.10.003 ; E Morrow (2001), Consistent significant variation between individual males in spermatozoal morphometry, J Zool, 254, 147, doi.org/10.1017/S0952836901000656 ; A Noorafshan (2010), A simple method for unbiased estimating of ejaculated sperm tail length in subjects with normal and abnormal sperm motility, Micron, 41, 96, doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2009.09.002 ; C Park (2002), Comparison of semen characteristics, sperm freezability and testosterone concentration between Duroc and Yorkshire boars during seasons, Anim Reprod Sci, 73, 53, doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(02)00129-X ; N Phillips (2004), Relationship between thirty post-thaw spermatozoal characteristics and the field fertility of 11 high-use Australian dairy AI sires, Anim Reprod Sci, 81, 47, doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2003.10.003 ; E Pinart (1998), Unilateral spontaneosus abdominal cryptochidism: structural and ultrastructural stady of sperm morphology, Anim Reprod Sci, 49, 247, doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(97)00074-2 ; T Rijsselaere (2004), Automated sperm morphometry and morphology analysis of canine semen by the Hamilton-Thorne analyser, Theriogenology, 62, 1292, doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.01.005 ; F Saravia (2007), Differences in boar sperm head shape and dimensions recorded by computer-assisted sperm morphometry are not related to chromatin integrity, Theriogenology, 68, 196, doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.04.052 ; L Severa (2010), Evaluation of shape variability of stallion sperm heads by means of image analysis and Fourier descriptors, Anim Reprod Sci, 119, 50, doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.12.007 ; J Smital (2004), Differences among breeds and manifestation of heterosis in AI boar sperm output, Anim Reprod Sci, 80, 121, doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(03)00142-8 ; J Smital (2009), Effect influencing boar semen, Anim Reprod Sci, 110, 335, doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.01.024 ; L Soderquist (1991), Sperm morphology and fertility in A.I. bulls, J Vet Med A, 38, 534, doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0442.1991.tb01045.x ; L Thurston (2001), Morphoologically distinct sperm subpopulations defined by Fourier shape descriptors in fresh ejaculates correlate with variation in boar semen quality following cryopreservation, J Androl, 22, 382. ; A Wysokińska (2009), Morphometrical characteristics of spermatozoa in Polish Landrace boars with regard to the number of spermatozoa in an ejaculate, Reprod Biol, 9, 271, doi.org/10.1016/S1642-431X(12)60031-X

DOI

10.2478/v10181-011-0005-z

×