Details

Title

Afterthoughts on biases in history perception

Journal title

Polish Psychological Bulletin

Yearbook

2010

Numer

No 2

Publication authors

Divisions of PAS

Nauki Humanistyczne i Społeczne

Publisher

Committee for Psychological Science PAS

Date

2010

Identifier

ISSN 0079-2993

References

Ankersmit F. (2004), Narracja, reprezentacja, doświadczenie. Studia z teorii historiografii [Narrative, representation, experience. Studies from theory of historiography]. ; Bouwel J. (2008), A pragmatist defense of non-relativistic explanatory pluralism in history and social science, History & Theory, 47, 168, doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2008.00445.x ; Christensen-Szalanski J. (1991), The hindsight bias: A meta-analysis, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48, 147, doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90010-Q ; Davis M. (1994), Empathy: A social psychological approach. ; D'Oro G. (2009), Reclaiming the ancestors of Simulation Theory, History & Theory, 48, 129, doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2009.00492.x ; Dymkowski M. (2000), Między psychologią a historią. O roli złudzeń w dziejach [Between psychology and history. On role of illusions in history]. ; Dymkowski M. (2006), Próby rozumienia uczestników dziejów jako źródło deformacji poznania historycznego [The attempts of history participants comprehension as a source of the biases in historical cognition], Historyka. Studia Metodologiczne, 36, 23. ; Dymkowski M. (2007), The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment: Hindsight bias among historians, Polish Psychological Bulletin, 38, 24. ; Fiske S. (1991), Social cognition. ; Fischhoff B. (1975), Hindsight ≠ foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 288, doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.1.3.288 ; Guilbault R. (2004), A meta-analysis of research on hindsight bias, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 26, 103, doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2602&3_1 ; Hawkins S. (1990), Hindsight: Biased judgments of past events after the outcomes are known, Psychological Bulletin, 107, 311, doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.3.311 ; Hempel C. (1949), Readings in philosophical analysis, 503. ; Hempel C. (1991), The philosophy of science, 299. ; Hilton D. (2010), Selecting explanations from causal chains: Do statistical principles explain preferences for voluntary causes?, European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 383. ; Huang C. (2007), The defining character of Chinese historical thinking, History & Theory, 46, 180, doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2007.00398.x ; Ji L. (2008), The leopard cannot change his spots, or can he? Culture and the development of lay theories of change, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 613, doi.org/10.1177/0146167207313935 ; Ji L. (2009), Looking into the past: cultural differences in perception and representation of the past, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 761, doi.org/10.1037/a0014498 ; Kaye S. (2010), Challenging certainty: The utility and history of counterfactualism, History & Theory, 49, 38, doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2010.00527.x ; Lorenz Ch. (2009), Przekraczanie granic. Eseje z filozofii historii i teorii historiografii [Bordercrossings. Essays from philosophy of history and theory of historiography]. ; Mey T. (2003), Explanation and thought experiments in history, History & Theory, 42, 28, doi.org/10.1111/1468-2303.00227 ; Nisbett R. (2003), The geography of thought. How Asians and Westerners think differently … and why. ; Nisbett R. (1980), Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. ; Nisbett R. (1977), Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes, Psychological Review, 84, 231, doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231 ; Oyserman D. (2002), Rethinking individualism and cllectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses, Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3, doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3 ; Pezzo M. (2003), Surprise, defense, or making sense: What removes hindsight bias?, Memory, 11, 421, doi.org/10.1080/09658210244000603 ; Rembowski J. (1989), Empatia. Studium psychologiczne [Empathy. Psychological study. ; Rosenfeld G. (2002), Why do ask ‘what if?’ Reflections on the function of alternate history, History & Theory, 41, 90, doi.org/10.1111/1468-2303.00222 ; Sanna L. (2002), When debiasing backfires: Accessible content and accessibility experiences in debiasing hindsight, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 497, doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.3.497 ; Sanna L. (2003), Debiasing the hindsight bias: The role of accessibility experiences and (mis)attributions, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 287, doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00528-0 ; Stannard D. (1980), Shrinking history. On Freud and failure of psychohistory. ; Stueber K. (2002), The psychological basis of historical explanation: Reenactment, simulation, and the fusion of horizons, History & Theory, 41, 25, doi.org/10.1111/1468-2303.00189 ; Stueber K. (2008), Reasons, generalizations, empathy, and narratives: The epistemic structure of action explanation, History & Theory, 47, 31, doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2008.00434.x ; Szaluta J. (1999), Psychohistory: Theory and practice. ; Tajfel H. (1986), Psychology of intergroup relations, 7. ; Teigen K. (2004), When the past becomes history: Effects of temporal order on explanations of trends, European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 191, doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.191 ; Topolski J. (1996), Jak się pisze i rozumie historię [How one writes and comprehends the history]. ; Tversky A. (1974), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, Science, 185, 1124, doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 ; Voss J. (2006), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance, 569, doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816796.033 ; Wasserman D. (1991), Hindsight and causality, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 30, doi.org/10.1177/0146167291171005

DOI

10.2478/v10059-010-0011-5

×