Szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Obtaining informed consent from study participants and results of field studies. Methodological problems caused by the literal treatment of codes of ethics

Tytuł czasopisma

Polish Psychological Bulletin

Rocznik

2017

Numer

No 2

Autorzy publikacji

Wydział PAN

Nauki Humanistyczne i Społeczne

Wydawca

Committee for Psychological Science PAS

Data

2017

Identyfikator

ISSN 0079-2993

Referencje

Dolinski (2016), One Serious Shock Versus Gradated Series of Shocks : Does Multiple Feet - in - the - Door Explain Obedience in Milgram Studies and https doi org, Basic Applied Social Psychology, 1, doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2016.1214836 ; Freedman (1966), Compliance without pressure : the foot - in - the - door technique of and, Journal Personality Social Psychology, 4, 195. ; Adair (1985), Ethical regulations and their impact on research practice, American Psychologist, 40, 59. ; Baumeister (2007), Psychology as the science of self - reports and fi nger movements : Whatever happened to actual behavior on, Perspectives Psychological Science, 2, 396. ; Menges (1973), Openness and honesty versus coercion and deception in psychological research, American Psychologist, 28, 1030. ; Doliński (2017), Would you deliver an electric shock in Obedience in the experimental paradigm developed by Stanley Milgram in the years following the original studies Social Psychological and Personality, Science. ; Weber (1972), Subject effects in laboratory research : An examination of subject roles , demand characteristics , and valid inference, Psychological Bulletin, 77, 273. ; Cialdini (2009), We have to break up on, Perspectives Psychological Science, 4, 5. ; Doliński (2002), Dialog jako metatechnika wpływu społecznego Tryb komunikacji a efektywność techniki liczy się każdy grosz, Studia Psychologiczne, 40, 127. ; Ferrer (2016), The Effect of Emotion on Visual Attention to Information and Decision Making in the Context of Informed Consent Process for Clinical Trials of, Journal Behavioral Decision Making, 29, 245. ; Lueptow (1977), The impact of informed consent regulations on response rate and response bias Sociological Methods, & Research, 6, 183. ; Spohn (1980), Informed consent and bias in samples of schizophrenic subjects at risk for drug withdrawal of, Journal Abnormal Psychology, 89, 79. ; Bond (2012), A - million - person experiment in social infl uence and political mobilization, Nature, 489. ; Farrell (2014), Systematic review and meta - analysis of audio - visual information aids for informed consent for invasive healthcare procedures in clinical practice, Patient Education and Counseling, 94, 20. ; Grzyb (2016), Why can t we just ask ? The infl uence of research methods on results The case of the bystander effect https doi org, Polish Psychological Bulletin, 47, doi.org/10.1515/ppb-2016-0027 ; Rosenberg (1965), When dissonance fails : On eliminating evaluation apprehension from attitude measurement of and, Journal Personality Social Psychology, 1, 28. ; Resnick (1973), Ethical standards as an independent variable in psychological research, American Psychologist, 28, 134. ; Burger (2009), Replicating Milgram : Would people still obey today, American Psychologist, 64, 1. ; Aronson (1968), Experimentation in social psychology The Handbook of, Social Psychology, 2, 1. ; Orne (1962), On the social psychology of the psychological experiment : With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications, American Psychologist, 17, 776.

DOI

10.1515/ppb-2017-0032

×