Title

Effects of Speech Intensity on the Callsign Acquisition Test (CAT) and Modified Rhyme Test (MRT) Presented in Noise

Journal title

Archives of Acoustics

Yearbook

2012

Numer

No 2

Publication authors

Misty Blue-Terry ; Maranda McBride ; Tomasz Letowski

Divisions of PAS

Nauki Techniczne

Publisher

Committee on Acoustics PAS, PAS Institute of Fundamental Technological Research, Polish Acoustical Society

Date

2012

Identifier

eISSN 2300-262X ; ISSN 0137-5075

References

Blue M. (2004), Speech intelligibility of the callsign acquisition test in a quiet environment, International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 10, 179, doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2004.11076606 ; Blue M. (2010), Speech intelligibility measured with shortened versions of callsign acquisition test (CAT) lists, Applied Ergonomics, 41, 291, doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2009.07.011 ; Fairbanks G. (1958), Test of phonemic difference: The rhyme test, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 30, 596, doi.org/10.1121/1.1909702 ; House A. (1965), Articulation testing methods: Consonantal differentiation with a closed-response set, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 37, 158, doi.org/10.1121/1.1909295 ; Howes D. (1957), On the relation between intelligibility and frequency of occurrence of English words, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 296, doi.org/10.1121/1.1908862 ; Letowski T., Karsh R., Vause N., Shilling R., Ballas J., Brungart D., McKinley R. (2001), <i>Human factors military lexicon: Auditory displays</i>, ARL Technical Report (ARL-TR-2526), U. S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Grounds, MD. ; Morton J. (1969), Interaction of information in word recognition, Psychological Review, 76, 165, doi.org/10.1037/h0027366 ; Nickerson J. F., Miller A. W. Jr., Shyne N. A. (1960), <i>A comparison of five articulation tests</i>, U. S. Air Force Research and Development Command, Report No. RADC-TR-60-71, Griffiss AFB (NY): U. S. Air Force. ; Rao M. (2003), Speech intelligibility of the call sign acquisition test (CAT) for army communication systems, null. ; Rao M. (2006), Callsign acquisition test (CAT): Speech intelligibility in noise, Ear and Hearing, 27, 120, doi.org/10.1097/01.aud.0000202289.32228.f6 ; Schultz M. (1964), Word familiarity influences in speech discrimination, Journal of Speech Hearing Research, 7, 395. ; Studebaker G. (1985), A "rationalized" arcsine transform, Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 455. ; Studebaker G. (1999), Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 2431, doi.org/10.1121/1.426848 ; Williams C. (1968), Relation between intelligibility scores on four test methods and three types of speech distortion, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 44, 1002, doi.org/10.1121/1.1911189 ; Zera J. (2004), Speech intelligibility measured by adaptive maximum-likelihood procedure, Speech Communication, 42, 313, doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2003.08.007

DOI

10.2478/v10168-012-0026-3