Details

Title

The “memory” misinformation effect may not be caused by memory failures: Exploring memory states of misinformed subjects

Journal title

Polish Psychological Bulletin

Yearbook

2017

Numer

No 3

Publication authors

Divisions of PAS

Nauki Humanistyczne i Społeczne

Publisher

Committee for Psychological Science PAS

Date

2017

Identifier

ISSN 0079-2993

References

Neuschatz (2001), Assessing the effectiveness of warnings and the phenomenological characteristics of false memories, Memory, 9, 53, doi.org/10.1080/09658210042000076 ; Mitchell (1996), Repeated exposure to suggestion and fales memory The role of contextual variablity of Memory and Special issue Illusions of memory, Journal Language, 35, 246, doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0014 ; Ayers (1998), theoretical review of the misinformation effect : Predictions from an activation - based memory model, Bulletin Review, 5, 1, doi.org/10.3758/BF03209454 ; Zaragoza (1989), Misled subjects may know more than their performance implies of and, Journal Experimental Psychology Learning Memory Cognition, 15, 246, doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.2.246 ; Titcomb (1995), Memory interference misinformation effects In eds Interference inhibition in pp San CA Academic, cognition, 263. ; Zaragoza (2006), Payment Misinformation effects and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory In Do justice and let the sky fall Elizabeth her contributions to law and academic freedom, science, 35. ; van Bergen (2010), Beckers distrust and acceptance of misinformation, Memory Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 885, doi.org/10.1002/acp.1595 ; Heath (1998), Memory for central and peripheral actions and props after varied postevent presentation Legal and Criminol ogical, Psychology, 3, 321, doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.1998.tb00369.x ; Bekerian (1983), Eyewitness testimony Were we misled of and, Journal Experimental Psychology Learning Memory Cognition, 9, 139, doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.9.1.139 ; Greene (1982), Inducing resistance to misleading information of and, Journal Verbal Learning Verbal Behavior, 21, 207, doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90571-0 ; Ackil (1995), Developmental differences in eyewitness suggestibility and memory for source Special issue : Early memory, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1, doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1995.1031 ; Lindsay (2008), Source monitoring In III of memory pp, Cognitive psychology, 325. ; Blank (2013), Comparing the infl uence of directly vs indirectly encountered post - event misinformation on eyewitness remembering https org, Acta Psychologica, 144, doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.10.006 ; Bowers (1984), When will postevent informationdistort eyewitness testimony of, Journal Applied Psychology, 69, doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.3.466 ; Saunders (2002), New evidence on the suggestibility of memory : The role of retrieval - induced forgetting in misinformation effects of, Journal Experimental Psychology Applied, 8, 127, doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.8.2.127 ; Pickrell (2004), The misinformation effect In Cognitive illusions handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking judgment and memory, Psychology, 345. ; Kossowska (2003), indywidualne w potrzebie poznawczego domknięcia Individual differences in the need fo closure, null, 46, 355. ; Barber (2008), How self - confidence and knowledge effects the sources of information selected during purchase situations ( Doctoral dissertation Texas Tech University, null. ; McCloskey (1985), Misleading postevent information and memory for events and evidence against memory impairment hypotheses of, Arguments Journal Experimental Psychology General, 114, doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.114.1.1 ; Bobier (2002), measure of susceptibility to social infl uence : Scale development and validation Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of Iowa oclc, null. ; Meade (2002), III Explorations in the social contagion of memory Memory http dx doi org, Cognition, 30, 995, doi.org/10.3758/BF03194318 ; Gudjonsson (1997), The Manual, Psychology. ; Belli (1994), Memory impairment and source misattribution in postevent misinformation experim ents with short retention intervals, Memory Cognition, 22, 40, doi.org/10.3758/BF03202760 ; Loftus (1979), Reactions to blatantly contradictory information, Memory Cognition, 7, 368, doi.org/10.3758/BF03196941 ; Blank (2014), How to protect eyewitness memory against the misinformation effect meta - analysis of post - warning studies of Applied Research in Memory and http dx doi org, Journal Cognition, 3, 77, doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.03.005 ; Roediger (2001), Social contagionof memory https org, Bulletin Review, 8, 365, doi.org/10.3758/BF03196174 ; Blank (1998), Memory states and memory tasks An integrative framework for eyewitness memory and suggestibility Memory, null, 6, 481, doi.org/10.1080/741943086 ; Lindsay (1990), Misleading suggestions can impair eyewitness s ability to remember event details of and, Journal Experimental Psychology Learning Memory Cognition, 16, 1077, doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.6.1077 ; Asch (1951), Effects of group pressure upon the modifi cation and distortion of judgments In ed Groups leadership men pp Pittsburgh, null, 177. ; Kiesler (1969), Conformity, null. ; Niedźwieńska (2002), Source monitoring errors in misinformation paradigm, Polish Psychological Bulletin, 33, 13. ; Lindsay (1989), The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for source, Memory Cognition, 17, 349, doi.org/10.3758/BF03198473 ; Metcalfe (1990), Composite holographic associative recall model CHARM and blended memories in eyewitness testimony of, Journal Experimental Psychology General, 119, doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.119.2.145 ; González (1999), Caracteristicas de la sugestionabilidad y su relacion con otras variables psicologicas Characteristics of suggestibility and its relationship with other psychological variables de, Anales Psicologia, 15, 57. ; Loftus (1978), Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory of : and, Burns Journal Experimental Psychology Human Learning Memory, 4, 19, doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.4.1.19 ; Multhaup (1999), de Source memory and eyewitness suggestibility in older adults of, Journal General Psychology, 126, doi.org/10.1080/00221309909595352 ; Mitchell (2001), Contextual overlap eyewitness suggestibility, Memory Cognition, 29, 616, doi.org/10.3758/BF03200462 ; Tousignant (1986), Discrepancy detection and vulnerability to misleading postevent information, Memory Cognition, 14, 329, doi.org/10.3758/BF03202511 ; Szpitalak (null), Reinforced self - affi rmation as a method for reducing the eyewitness misinformation effect http dx org, Psychology Crime Law, 21, 2015. ; Pasek (null), tłumaczenie Sugestialności i Polish translation of the Inventory of Suggestibility by and Unpublished manuscript, null. ; Szpitalak (2016), Reinforced self - affi rmation and interrogative suggestibility and http dx doi org, Psychiatry Psychology Law, 23, 512, doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2015.1081088 ; Gudjonsson (1989), Compliance in an interrogative situation new scale and Individual, Personality Differences, 10, 535, doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(89)90035-4 ; Dalton (2006), Social suggestibility to central and peripheral misinformation, Memory, 14, 486, doi.org/10.1080/09658210500495073 ; Roebers (2000), The impact of misleading questions on eyewitness memory in children and adults, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 509, doi.org/10.1002/1099-0720(200011/12)14:6<509::AID-ACP668>3.0.CO;2- ; Oeberst (2012), Undoing suggestive infl uence on memory : The reversibility of the eyewitness misinformation effect http dx org, Cognition, 125, doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.009 ; Kruglanski (1996), Motivated closing of the mind Seizing Freezing, Psychological Review, 103, doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.263 ; Loftus (1975), Leading questions and the eyewitness report, Cognitive Psychology, 560, doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90023-7 ; MacBride (1965), The influence of selfconfidence upon resistance of perceptual judgments to group pressure The of Interdisciplinary, Journal Psychology Applied, 9, 1, doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1965.10545258 ; Orne (1962), On the social psychology of the psychological experiment : With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications, American Psychologist, 17, 11, doi.org/10.1037/h0043424 ; Zaragoza (1994), Source misattributions and the suggestibility of eyewitness memory of and, Journal Experimental Psychology Learning Memory Cognition, 20, 934, doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.934 ; Blank (2005), Another look at retroactive and proactive interference : a quantitative analysis of conversion processes, Memory, 13, 200, doi.org/10.1080/09608210344000698 ; Flowe (2009), Limitations of expert psychology testimony on eyewitness identifi cation In Expert testimony on the psychology of eyewitness identifi cation New York University, null, 201. ; Webster (1994), Individual differences in need for cognitive closure of and, Journal Personality Social Psychology, 67, doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049 ; Polczyk (2007), Mechanizmy efektu dezinformacji w kontekście zeznań świadka naocznego The mechanisms of the misinformation effetc in the context of eyewitness memory Uniwersytetu JagiellońskieRoeb ers Mental reinstatement of the misinformation context and the, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 477, doi.org/10.1002/acp.886 ; Szpitalak (2016), The infl uence of social para - social and nonsocial misleading post - event sources on memory performance https org, European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 185, doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2136 ; Wilk (2004), Skala Ulegania Gudjonssona - właściwości psychometryczne i korelaty zbadane na próbie osób odbywających karę pozbawienia wolności Gudjonsson Compliance Scale - psychometric properties and correlates researched on a sample of prisoners Unpublished Thesis, null. ; Wright (1998), quality and misinformation for peripheral and central objects and, Memory Legal Criminological Psychology, 3, 273, doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049

DOI

10.1515/ppb-2017-0045

×