TitleApplication of Multi-criteria Approach for Sustainability Assessment of Manufacturing Processes
Journal titleManagement and Production Engineering Review
Divisions of PASNauki Techniczne
PublisherProduction Engineering Committee of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Polish Association for Production Management
IdentifierISSN 2080-8208 ; eISSN 2082-1344
ReferencesTriantaphyllou (1995), Using the analytic hierarchy process for decision making in engineering applica - tions : some challenges of In - dustrial Engineering : Applications and Practice, International Journal, 62, 35. ; Gupta (2013), Supply Chain management a three di - mensional framework of Management Re - search, Journal, 58, 76. ; Kluczek (null), Assessment of the eco - efficiency of manufacturing processes based on MFA - LCA - MFCA methods Environmental Engineering and Management in press, Journal, 42. ; Goyal (2014), Corporate sustainability performance assessment : an analytical hierarchy process approach of Intercul - tural Information, International Journal Management, 44. ; Oyatoye (2016), An application of analytic hierarchy process to Volume Number September Management and Production investment portfolio selection in the banking sec - tor of the Nigerian capital market Journal of Eco - nomics and International, Engineering Review Finance, 63, 321. ; Principi (2014), A comparative life cycle as - sessment of luminaires for general lighting for the office compact fluorescent vs Light Emit - ting Diode ( LED ) a case study of Cleaner Production, Journal, 41, 96. ; Honkasalo (2005), Environ - mental permitting as a driver for eco - efficiency in the dairy sector : a closer look at the IPPC Direc - tive of Cleaner Production, Journal, 50, 1049. ; Jayal (2010), Sustainable manufacturing : Modeling and opti - mization challenges at the product process and sys - tem levels CIRP of Manufacturing Science and Technology, Journal, 55, 144. ; Goodson (2002), Read a Plant Fast Review, Harvard Business, 51, 105. ; Kornfeld (2011), Project portfolio selection in continuous improvement of Operations & Production, International Journal Management, 30, 1071. ; Ho (2010), Multi - criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selec - tion : A literature review European of Op - erational Research, Journal, 59, 16. ; Khalili (2013), Application of multi - criteria decision analysis in design of sustain - able environmental management system framework of Cleaner Production, Journal, 26, 188. ; Cziner (2005), Multi - criteria decision making in process integration of Cleaner Production, Journal, 49, 475. ; Agarwal (2011), A review of multi - criteria decision making tech - niques for supplier evaluation and selection Inter - national of Industrial Engineering Compu - tations, Journal, 46, 801. ; Martinsuo (2013), Project portfolio management in practice and in context of Project, International Journal Management, 32, 794. ; Bai (2015), Methodology for evaluating cleaner production in the stone processing industry : case study of a Shandong stone processing firm of Cleaner, Journal Production, 54, 461. ; Sudarsan (2010), Sus - tainable manufacturing : metrics standards and in - frastructure workshop summary Automation Sci - ence and Engineering ( CASE Confer - ence on Aug, IEEE, 48, 21. ; Liu (2005), The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier International of, Journal Production Economics, 29, 308, doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.09.005 ; Dan (2013), An analysis of the original driving forces behind the promotion of compulsory cleaner production assess - ment in key enterprises of China of Cleaner Production, Journal, 40, 8. ; Arrais (2014), Collaborative negotiation platform for networked organizations using dynamic multi - criteria decision model of Decision Support System Technology, International Journal, 35, 1. ; Widyaningrum (2012), Development of the sea fishery supply chain performance measure - ment system : a case study Supply Chain Management, International Journal, 57. ; Ulewicz (2016), Implementation of logic flow in planning and production control Management and Production Engineering, Review, 56, 89.