Details

Title

Comparative Anatomy of the Lip Spur and Additional Lateral Sepal Spurs in a Three-Spurred Form (f. fumeauxiana) of Anacamptis pyramidalis

Journal title

Acta Biologica Cracoviensia s. Botanica

Yearbook

2010

Numer

No 1

Publication authors

Divisions of PAS

Nauki Biologiczne i Rolnicze

Publisher

Biological Commission of the Polish Academy of Sciences – Cracow Branch

Date

2010

Identifier

eISSN 1898-0295 ; ISSN 0001-5296

References

Bateman R. (2002), Developmental Genetics and Plant Evolution, 109. ; Bateman R. (2006a), The good, the bad, and the ugly: Using naturally occurring terata to distinguish the possible from the impossible in orchid floral evolution, Aliso, 22, 481. ; Bateman R. (2006b), Evolutionary and Morphometric Implications of Morphological Variation Among Flowers Within an Inflorescence: A Case-Study Using European Orchids, Annals of Botany, 98, 975. ; Box M. (2008), Floral ontogenetic evidence of repeated speciation via paedomorphosis in subtribe Orchidinae (Orchidaceae), Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 157, 429. ; Bianco P. (1991), Polyploidy and aneuploidy in <i>Ophrys, Orchis</i>, and <i>Anacamptis</i> (Orchidaceae), Plant Systematics and Evolution, 178, 235. ; Bronner R. (1975), Simultaneous demonstration of lipid and starch in plant tissues, Stain Technology, 50, 1, doi.org/10.3109/10520297509117023 ; Cozzolino S. (2005), Orchid diversity: an evolutionary consequence of deception?, Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20, 9, 487. ; C. Del Prete (1991), Karyological differentiation and speciation in C. Mediterranean <i>Anacamptis</i> (Orchidaceae), Plant Systematics and Evolution, 174, 115. ; Feder N. (1968), Plant microtechnique; some principles and new methods, American Journal of Botany, 55, 123. ; Fritz A. (1996), Floral Biology: Studies on Floral Evolution in Animal-Pollinated Plants, 319. ; Jensen W. (1962), Botanical Histochemistry. ; Margońska H. (2008), Une nouvelle forme de <i>Anacamptis pyramidalis</i> (Orchidaceae), Richardiana, 8, 1, 1. ; Mondragón-Palomino M. (1991), Why are orchid flowers so diverse? Reduction of evolutionary constraints by paralogues of class B floral homeotic genes, Plant Systematics and Evolution, 178, 235. ; Mondragón-Palomino M. (2008), MADS about the evolution of orchid flowers, Trends in Plant Science, 13, 2, 51, doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2007.11.007 ; Neiland M. (1994), Reproductive ecology of European orchids, null. ; Neiland M. (1998), Fruit set, nectar reward, and rarity in the Orchidaceae, American Journal of Botany, 85, 1657. ; Proctor M. (1996), The Natural History of Pollination. ; Rudall P. (2002), Roles of synorganisation, zygomorphy and heterotopy in floral evolution: the gynostemium and labellum of orchids and other lilioid monocots, Biological Reviews, 77, 403. ; Rudall P. (2003), Evolutionary change in flowers and inflorescences: evidence from naturally occurring terata, Trends in Plant Science, 8, 2, 76. ; Rudall P. (2004), Evolution of zygomorphy in monocot flowers: iterative patterns and developmental constraints, New Phytologist, 162, 25. ; Ruzin S. (1999), Plant Microtechnique and Microscopy. ; Spurr A. (1969), A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy, Journal of Ultrastructure Research, 26, 31. ; Theißen G. (2006), The proper place of hopeful monsters in evolutionary biology, Theory in Biosciences, 124, 349. ; Thomé O. (1885), Flora von Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz. ; Tichy H. (2001), Chromosome numbers of European orchids: interpreting data, Journal Europäischer Orchideen, 33, 217.

DOI

10.2478/v10182-010-0002-z

×