Details

Title

Somatic Embryogenesis and Plant Regeneration from Hypocotyl and Leaf Explants of Brassica Oleracea var. Botrytis (Cauliflower)

Journal title

Acta Biologica Cracoviensia s. Botanica

Yearbook

2011

Volume

vol. 53

Numer

No 1

Publication authors

Keywords

somatic embryogenesis ; cauliflower ; Brassica oleracea var. botrytis ; embryogenic callus ; tissue culture

Divisions of PAS

Nauki Biologiczne i Rolnicze

Publisher

Biological Commission of the Polish Academy of Sciences – Cracow Branch

Date

2011

Type

Artykuły / Articles

Identifier

eISSN 1898-0295 ; ISSN 0001-5296

References

Ahmed A. (2011), Effect of picloram, additives and plant growth regulators on somatic embryogenesis of <i>Phyla nodiflora</i> (L.) Greene, Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 54, 7, doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132011000100002 ; Ahloowalia B. (1991), Somatic embryos in monocots: The genesis and genetic stability, Revue de Cytolgie et de Biologie Vegetales, Le Botaniste, 14, 223. ; Ali A. (2007), Effect of different explants and media compositions for efficient somatic embryogenesis in sugarcane (<i>Saccharum officinarum</i>), Pakistan Journal of Botany, 39, 6, 1961. ; Arnold V. (2002), Developmental pathways of somatic embryogenesis, Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture, 69, 233, doi.org/10.1023/A:1015673200621 ; Bhalla P. (1999), In vitro propagation of cauliflower, <i>Brassica oleracea</i> var. <i>botrytis</i> for hybrid seed production, Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture, 56, 89, doi.org/10.1023/A:1006221218191 ; Chikkala V. (2008), Regeneration from leaf explants and protoplasts of <i>Brassica oleracea</i> var. <i>botrytis</i> (cauliflower), Scientia Horticulturae, 119, 330, doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.07.036 ; Duncan D. (1955), Multiple range and multiple F-tests, Biometrics, 11, 1, doi.org/10.2307/3001478 ; Eimert K. (1992), Transformation of cauliflower (<i>Brassica oleracea</i> var. <i>botrytis</i>)-an experimental survey, Plant Molecular Biology, 19, 485, doi.org/10.1007/BF00023396 ; Fransz P. (1994), Improvement of protoplast regeneration from a recalcitrant inbred line of <i>Brassica oleracea</i>: a morphogenetic analysis, Plant Science, 98, 87, doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(94)90151-1 ; Ikeda-Iwai M. (2003), Stress-induced somatic embryogenesis in vegetative tissues of, Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal, 34, 107. ; Jourdan P. (1990), Improved protoplast culture and stability of cytoplasmic traits in plants regenerated from leaf protoplasts of cauliflower (<i>Brassica oleracea</i> ssp. <i>botrytis</i>), Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture, 21, 227, doi.org/10.1007/BF00047615 ; Karami O. (2008), Induction of embryogenic callus and plant regeneration in Carnation (<i>Dianthus caryophyllus</i> L.), Online Journal of Biological Sciences, 8, 4, 68, doi.org/10.3844/ojbsci.2008.68.72 ; Kieffer M. (1995), Rapid mass production of cauliflower propagules from fractionated and graded curd, Plant Science, 107, 229, doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(95)04110-G ; Kieffer M. (2001), A cost effective protocol for in vitro mass propagation of cauliflower, Plant Science, 160, 1015, doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(01)00347-8 ; Kumar A. (1993), Rapid in vitro propagation of cauliflower, Plant Science, 90, 175, doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(93)90237-T ; Leroy X. (2000), Cauliflower somatic embryogenesis and analysis of regenerant stability by ISSRs, Plant Cell Report, 19, 1102, doi.org/10.1007/s002990000252 ; Lv L. (2005), Study on transformation of cowpea trypsin inhibitor gene into cauliflower (<i>Brassica oleracea</i> var. <i>botrytis</i>), African Journal of Biotechnology, 4, 1, 45. ; Martin K. (2005), Direct and indirect somatic embryogenesis on cotyledon explants of <i>Quassia amara</i> L., an antileukaemic drug plant, In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology, 41, 54, doi.org/10.1079/IVP2004588 ; Murashige T. (1962), A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures, Physiology Plantarum, 51, 473, doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x ; Murthy H. (2008), Recurrent somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in <i>Coriandrum sativum</i> L, Scientia Horticulturae, 118, 168, doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.05.037 ; Namasivayam P. (2007), Acquisition of embryogenic competence during somatic embryogenesis, Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 90, 1, doi.org/10.1007/s11240-007-9249-9 ; Pareek L. (1978), Somatic embryogenesis in leaf callus from cauliflower (<i>Brassica oleracea</i> var. <i>botrytis</i>), Plant Science Letters, 11, 311, doi.org/10.1016/0304-4211(78)90016-0 ; Pogrebnyak N. (2006), Collard and cauliflower as a base for production of recombinant antigens, Plant Science, 171, 677, doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2006.06.017 ; Schumann G. (1995), Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, vol. 30: Somatic Embryogenesis and Synthetic Seed, 1, 71. ; Sharp W. (1980), The physiology of in vitro sexual embryogenesis, Horticulture Review, 2, 268. ; Qin Y. (2006), Shoot differentiation, regeneration and analysis of somaclonal variation by RAPD, Hereditas, 143, 91, doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0018-0661.01944.x ; Vatsya B. (1982), Plant regeneration from cotyledonary protoplasts of cauliflower (<i>Brassica oleracea</i> var. <i>botrytis</i>), Protoplasma, 113, 161, doi.org/10.1007/BF01282006 ; Vikrant A. (2001), Direct as well as indirect somatic embryogenesis from immature (unemerged) inflorescence of a minor millet <i>Paspalum scrobiculatum</i> L, Euphytica, 120, 167, doi.org/10.1023/A:1017558230813 ; Watts L. (1963), Investigations into the breeding system of cauliflower <i>Brassica oleracea</i> var. <i>botrytis</i> (L.), Euphytica, 12, 323. ; William E. (1986), Somatic embryogenesis: factors influencing coordinate behavior of cells as an embryogenic group, Annals of Botany, 57, 44. ; Yang Q. (1992), A study of factors affecting anther culture of cauliflower (<i>Brassica oleracea</i> var. <i>botrytis</i>), Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture, 28, 289, doi.org/10.1007/BF00036126 ; Zobayed S. (1999), Cauliflower shoot-culture: effects of different types of ventilation on growth and physiology, Plant Science, 141, 209, doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(98)00232-5

DOI

10.2478/v10182-011-0004-5

×