Mechanism of Spontaneous Autogamy in the Allogamous Lepidopteran Orchid Gymnadenia Conopsea (L.) R. Br. (Orchidaceae)

Journal title

Acta Biologica Cracoviensia s. Botanica




No 1

Publication authors

Divisions of PAS

Nauki Biologiczne i Rolnicze


Abstract Studies of plant breeding systems are particularly important when they involve facultative processes, which can be overlooked in natural conditions. This especially applies to species that are considered allogamous, due to their pollination syndrome and floral architecture. We examined the potential level and factors enabling or limiting spontaneous autogamy in three populations of the lepidopteran orchid Gymnadenia conopsea. Using a bagging experiment, we noted the stages of the anther thecae and the positions of the pollinaria at the five phenological stages of the flower, as well as the quantity of autogamously set fruits and the number of properly formed seeds. In the studied populations, autogamy represents an accidental character, with a maximum of 3.3% of fruits set spontaneously per analysed sample in a given population, and with seed numbers ranging from 29 to 354. This process is an environmentally dependent co-product of the mechanisms that enable a position appropriate for touching the stigma (bending of the caudicle) and increase male fitness (disintegration of the massulae), preceded by the gradual opening of the anther chambers. Autopollination of G. conopsea may occur in the flowers at various flowering stages (excluding the beginning of anthesis) at each position on the inflorescence.


Biological Commission of the Polish Academy of Sciences – Cracow Branch


2015[2015.01.01 AD - 2015.12.31 AD]


eISSN 1898-0295 ; ISSN 0001-5296


TałałajI (2008), Selfing potential inEpipactis palustris helleborineandE atrorubens, Plant Systematics and Evolution, 276. ; MarholdK (2005), Morphological and karyological differentiation ofGymnadenia densifloraandG conopseain the Czech Republic and Slovakia, Preslia, 77. ; PaciniE (2004), Cytophysiology of pollen presentation and dispersal, Flora, 199. ; HuberFK (2005), Floral scent emission and pollinator attraction in two species ofGymnadenia, Oecologia, 142. ; YatesEE (1993), Environmental regulation of anther dehiscence and pollen germination in pecan, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 118. ; HamrickJL (1989), Allozyme diversity in plant species In eds Breeding and Genetic Resources Sinauer Associates, Population Genetics, 43. ; LisciM (1994), Pollination ecophysiology ofMercurialis annuaL an anemophilous species flowering all year around, Annals of Botany, 74. ; SzlachetkoD (2000), Gynostemia Orchidalium I, Acta Botanica Fennica, 169. ; GoodwillieC (2006), Inbreeding depression and mixed mating inLeptosiphon jepsonii : a comparison of three populations, Annals of Botany, 98. ; BorbaEL (1999), Temporal variation in pollinarium size after its removal in species ofBulbophyllum : a different mechanism preventing self - pollination in Orchidaceae, Plant Systematics and Evolution, 217. ; MeekersT (2011), Effects of habitat fragmentation on the reproductive success of the nectar - producing orchidGymnadenia conopseaand the nectarlessOrchis mascula, Plant Ecology, 212. ; HolsingerKE (1996), Pollination biology and the evolution of mating systems in flowering plants, Evolutionary Biology, 29. ; StarkG (2011), Strong genetic differentiation betweenGymnadenia conopseaandG densifloradespite morphological similarity, Plant Systematics and Evolution, 293. ; CharlesworthD (2006), Evolution of plant breeding systems, Current Biology, 16. ; MoggridgeJT (1865), Observations on some orchids of the South of France, Journal of Linnean Society, 9. ; KaliszS (2003), Benefits of autonomous selfing under unpredictable pollinator environments, Ecology, 84. ; SletvoldN (2011), Among - population variation in costs of reproduction in the long lived orchidGymnadenia conopsea : an experimental study, Oecologia, 167. ; PeterCI (2014), Anther cap retention prevents self - pollination by elaterid beetles in the South African orchidEulophia foliosa, Annals of Botany, 97. ; ArathiHS (2002), Autogamy and floral longevity inMimulus guttatus of, International Journal Plant Science, 163. ; KaliszS (1999), The mechanism of delayed selfing inCollinsia verna Scrophulariaceae, American Journal of Botany, 86. ; BianchiniM (1996), Explosive anther dehiscence inRicinus communisL involves cell wall modifications and relative humidity of, International Journal Plant Science, 157. ; MeyerB (2007), Contribution of diurnal and nocturnal pollinators to the reproductive success of the orchid speciesGymnadenia conopsea, Entomologia Generalis, 30. ; MacnairMR (1989), Adaptative speciation inMimulus : an ecological comparison ofM cupriphiluswith its presumed progenitorM guttatus, New Phytologist, 112. ; BoxMS (2008), Floral ontogenetic evidence of repeated speciation via paedomorphosis in subtribe Orchidinae, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 157. ; ShamrovII (2003), Critical stages of ovule and seed development, Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica, 45. ; NeilandMRM (1995), Maximisation of reproductive success by European Orchidaceae under conditions of infrequent pollination, Protoplasma, 187. ; FreudensteinJV (1997), Sectile pollinia and relationships in the Orchidaceae, Plant Systematics and Evolution, 205. ; CatlingPM (1991), A synopsis of breeding systems and pollination in North American orchids, Lindleyana, 6. ; BellAK (2009), Comparative micromorphology of nectariferous and nectarless labellar spurs in selected clades of subtribe Orchidinae, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 160. ; JersákováJ (2010), Absence of pollinator - mediated premating barriers in mixed - ploidy populations ofGymnadenia conopseas l, Evolutionary Ecology, 24. ; GustafssonS (2000), Patterns of genetic variation inGymnadenia conopsea , the fragrant orchid, Molecular Ecology, 9. ; GoodwillieC (2005), The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants : occurrence , theoretical explanations , and empirical evidence Evolution , and, Annual Review of Ecology Systematics, 36. ; JostL (2008), Combining significance levels from multiple experiments or analyses Available athttp : / / www loujost com and Physics Significance Levels CombiningPValues htm Archived by WebCite athttp : / / www webcitation org zon, Statistics, 20, 68. ; JohnsonSD (2000), The structure and function of orchids pollinaria, Plant Systematics and Evolution, 222. ; VöthW (2000), Gymnadenia , Nigritellaund ihre Bestäuber, Journal Europäischer Orchideen, 32. ; PaciniE (2002), Types of pollen dispersal units in orchids , and their consequences for germination and fertilization, Annals of Botany, 89. ; FreudensteinJV (1991), A systematic study of endothecial thickenings in the Orchidaceae, American Journal of Botany, 78. ; StpiczyńskaM (2001), Osmophores of the fragrant orchidGymnadenia conopseaL, Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae, 70. ; StpiczyńskaM (2001), Anatomy and ultrastructure of spur nectary ofGymnadenia conopsea ) Orchidaceae, Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae, 70. ; JersákováJ (2004), Reproductive success and sex variation in nectarless and rewarding orchids of, International Journal Plant Science, 165. ; SuetsuguK (2013), Delayed autonomous self - pollination in two Japanese varieties ofEpipactis helleborine, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 173. ; LloydDG (1992), Self - fertilization and cross - fertilization in plants Functional dimensions, International Journal of Plant Sciences, 153. ; TrávnícekP (2012), Minority cytotypes in European populations of theGymnadenia conopseacomplex Orchidaceae greatly increase intraspecific and intrapopulation diversity, Annals of Botany, 110. ; SquirrellJ (2002), Taxonomic complexity and breeding system transitions : conservation genetics of theEpipactis leptochilacomplex, Molecular Ecology, 11. ; SletvoldN (2012), Separating selection by diurnal and nocturnal pollinators on floral display and spur length inGymnadenia conopsea, Ecology, 93.