Humanities and Social Sciences

Wiadomości Numizmatyczne

Content

Wiadomości Numizmatyczne | 2015 | Rok LIX | Zeszyt 1-2 (199-200) |

Abstract

This article focuses on a Samarian coin issue that portrays a biga carrying people clad in Iranian apparel on the obverse and an Iranian horseman on the reverse. It was struck in the name of BDYHBL and the forerunners of the type can be traced to Sidonian coinage and Achaemenid-infl uenced minor arts. It is possible that the issuer of the coin held a military or an administrative post in the Achaemenid realm, which could explain why this and other issues bearing his name contained motifs drawn from its iconography.

Go to article

Abstract

From the territory of Central Europe that lies north of the Sudetes and the Carpathians, occupied during the Roman Period by the Przeworsk and the Wielbark cultures, we currently have a record of only a very small number of Roman Imperial denarii issued before AD 64. The interpretation of these finds is hindered by the small size of this database and the lack of archaeological context. There are three possibilities; one of them is that these coins, or at least some of them, entered the region as a complement of a ‘Republican’ wave of infl ux, which contained a signifi cant amount of Roman Republican denarii. The second possibility is that the Early Imperial denarii passed into the Central European Barbaricum during the second century as a small admixture to a great wave of denarii struck after AD 64. The third option is that we ought to view the influx of the Early Imperial coins as an independent and a minor occurrence not related directly either to the ‘Republican’ or the ‘second-century’ wave. The view held by the author of this article is that the influx of the bulk of pre-AD 64 Imperial denarii is best explained by the first hypothesis.

Go to article

Abstract

In 1822 and 1838 two finds of late Roman solidi hoarded around AD 430/440 were unearthed at the Goldberg near Klein Tromp in former Eastern Prussia (now Trąbki Małe, Poland). With an approximate total of 141 gold coins confi rmed (including one aureus of Gordian III) this hoard represents the largest hoard of Roman solidi in Poland and the Baltic region to date. Most of the coins entered the Royal Cabinet in Berlin, while smaller parts were given to the University at Königsberg and the landowner. This article provides an overview of the history of the hoard’s discovery and later fate.

Go to article

Abstract

The Ossolineum bought the coin discussed in this article at the 58th auction of the Warsaw Numismatic Centre held on 8 November 2014. It was initially identified as a Gothic imitation of an aureus of Severus Alexander, most probably made in the Chernyakhiv culture. Only after close examination was it revealed that the coin had a runic inscription, which was part of the matrix and not carved on the coin. This means that it is the oldest known runic coin, as it should be dated to 271–332, whereas other runic coins or gold Scandinavian bracteates are dated no earlier than to the fi fth century AD. The authenticity of the specimen has been confi rmed by microscopic examination, comparative analysis of other imitations, numismatic objects produced in an analogical method or style and metal analyses. Attempts to trace the provenance of the specimen failed. The meaning of the inscription cannot be ascertained. The discovery of runic signs on the coin has serious implications for our knowledge of ancient East Germanic peoples. It means that we have to date the beginnings of Germanic coinage at least two centuries earlier than has been accepted until recently. We must also accept that the links between the Baltic and Black Sea regions were very close.

Go to article

Abstract

The author updates the state of knowledge about the origins of Polish coinage in the late tenth and early eleventh centuries. This became possible due to new coin finds and the use of new research methods and, above all, revealing new die-links. The author concludes that it was not Mieszko I (c. 962–992), but his son Boleslaus the Brave (992–1025) who began Polish coinage. This early coinage was more intensely produced and more diverse than was previously thought. In one mint, correctly inscribed dies and corrupted imitations of foreign patterns were used simultaneously. Coins served the purpose of both propaganda and economic tools. They accounted for a small proportion of the prevailing foreign coins in circulation.

Go to article

Abstract

In this article, a new interpretation of the so-called Cyrillic penny has been proposed. The coin in question was struck for Duke Boleslaus Chrobry (‘the Brave’) in Greater Poland, probably in the last months of 1018. The reason for the revision of earlier hypotheses is the bulla of a Kyivan prince, Iaroslav the Wise that was uncovered in Novgorod Velikiĭ and dated to c.1018. The bulla differs in its iconography from other tenth and eleventh century lead seals from the area of Rus´. The close similarity between the fi gure of Iaroslav on his bulla and the depiction of the Polish duke on his Cyrillic penny as well as the contemporaneity of the two objects, leads us to presume that the penny played some role in propaganda activities associated with the capture of Kyiv by Boleslaus in 1018.

Go to article

Abstract

The article presents new coins and die-chains of Bolesław the Brave’s coins. A mule of the PRINCES POLONIE type and an Otto-Adelheid imitation, kept in the State Historical Museum in Moscow, connected two previously known die-chains, enlarging the number of Bolesław the Brave’s coin types. New coins from the antiquarian market also expanded the DVX INCLITVS die chain. All these new coins and die chains show that despite the chaotic and incidental character of Bolesław the Brave’s coinage, in most cases the dies were produced in stylistically homogenous pairs, which were mixed afterwards during the minting process. Analysis of the quantity and chronology of Bolesław’s coins might also suggest that the heir to the throne, Mieszko II, was responsible for a relative ‘ordering’ of the oldest Polish coinage.

Go to article

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyse which kinds of monetary taxation and coinage policies the minting authorities applied in Sweden in the period 1153–1512. In medieval Europe, old coins were frequently declared invalid and were exchanged for new ones at fi xed rates and dates. Here, the question of whether and when such periodic recoinage was applied in medieval Sweden is analyzed against the historical record. A theory of how short-lived and long-lived coinage systems work is applied to Swedish coinage. Sweden adopted similar coin forms as those minted in Continental Europe in the Middle Ages, but also adopted the corresponding continental coinage and monetary taxation policies linked to these coin forms. Swedish experience is extraordinarily well in line with what one would expect from the theory of short-lived coins. Economic backwardness, limited monetization of society and separate currency areas facilitated recoinage. Recoinage with varying frequency was applied in 1180–1290 when only bracteates were minted. This is evidenced by many different coin types per reign, coin hoards which are dominated by a few types and dating of types to specifi c periods of the kings’ reigns. However, monetization increased in the late thirteenth century, making recoinage more diffi cult. and bracteates were replaced by long-lived two-faced coins in 1290. With an end to recoinage, the Swedish kings then accelerated the debasement of the long-lived coins. The disappearing recoinage fees were compensated for by debasing the silver content. Such debasements – interrupted by several coinage reforms – were applied until the beginning of the sixteenth century.

Go to article

Abstract

Recent archaeological discoveries have allowed us to examine a series of bracteates from East Pomerania from the late twelfth and the thirteenth century, which has enabled us to construct a new view of medieval coinage in this province. A pivotal role may be attributed to the coins inscribed with the name of Sambor I, the fi rst historical master of Gdańsk, and with the monogrammed name of Otto, which is supposed to refer to St Otto of Bamberg.

Go to article

Abstract

From the annexation of the Polish territories in the thirteenth century, Neumark and Torzym Province (Land Sternberg) became districts of the Margraviate of Brandenburg. Neumark belonged temporarily (1402–1454) to the Teutonic Order. From the very beginning, the two regions clearly varied in their coin circulation. The earliest Brandenburgian denier fi nds from east of the Oder River date to the last decade of the thirteenth century. However, the most important differences in the coin circulation became noticeable only after the middle of the fourteenth century.

Go to article

Abstract

The denarius of Marcus Junius Brutus, commemorating the Ides of March, can be placed among the coins most established in the collective imagination of ancient societies and, later, among those having the greatest impact on European humanism. One cannot point out another antique coin that refers directly to such a fateful historical event as the assassination of Julius Caesar. Respublica liberata, the work by Andreas Alciatus (1492–1550), printed in 1546, is outstanding among numerous, ancient and modern examples of the reception of Brutus’s coin. Alciatus, a famous Milanese lawyer, composed his work in the innovative form of an emblematic study. Emblematics enjoyed great popularity throughout the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Symbols and allegorical representations were used as a universal media for describing the world. The distinguishing representation of daggers and pileus – according to the general idea of emblems – had been separated by Alciatus from its historical context and given a universal and ageless meaning. In this manner, the writer made the ancient iconographical type the general symbol of the liberation of a state from the rule of a tyrant.

Go to article

Abstract

The Puck (Mrzezino) hoard and procedures of the Prussian Monarchy towards coin finds. Treasure legislation in the Prussian monarchy shared hoards between the finders and the owners of the ground. This regulation produced archival evidence dating back to the eighteenth century. The large gold hoard, found in what is nowadays Mrzezino in northern Poland in 1795, was reported to Berlin shortly after its discovery. In the beginning, mainly juridical questions were discussed, but in 1798, this moved to the discussion of what to do with the coins and where and to whom they should be sold. The archival reports reveal that the coins were mainly of Anastasius, some of Zeno’s and only a few of Leo, Basiliscus and Theodosius and, as their value was above intrinsic value, they were sold to the royal collection in Berlin as well as to collections in Prussia and Poland.

Go to article

Editorial office

Komitet Redakcyjny

  • Borys Paszkiewicz (redaktor naczelny),
  • Adam Degler (redaktor tematyczny: starożytność),
  • Witold Garbaczewski (redaktor tematyczny: średniowiecze i nowożytność)
  • Krystian Książek (redaktor tematyczny: znaleziska)
  • Marta Męclewska (redaktor bibliograficzny),
  • Michał Zawadzki (sekretarz redakcji)  

Rada Naukowa


Jarosław Bodzek,
Aleksander Bursche,
Peter Ilisch,
Mykolas Michelbertas,
Petr Vorel,
Roman Zaoral

 

Contact

Polska Akademia Nauk,
Pl. Defilad1 (Pałac Kultury i Nauki)
00-901 Warszawa
wiad.num@wp.pl

Instructions for authors

Wskazówki dla PT. Autorów „Wiadomości Numizmatycznych”

Wszystkich PT. Autorów bardzo prosimy o stosowanie się do następujących zaleceń, dotyczących przygotowania prac:

Teksty przyjmujemy w postaci zapisu elektronicznego (przesyłka elektroniczna lub płyta CD) w którymś z powszechnie stosowanych programów edytorskich (np. Word lub Star); w przypadku zastosowania jakichkolwiek znaków spoza standardowego zestawu krojów: Arial, Calibri, Courier, Times New Roman, Symbol i Wingdings — niezbędny jest również wydruk papierowy.

● Prace (oprócz przeznaczonych do działów znalezisk, recenzji lub kroniki) winny być opatrzone abstraktem (wyjaśniającym w 3-5 linijkach, o czym traktuje praca) i streszczeniem o objętości ok. 10% tekstu pracy. Oba te teksty winny być w języku angielskim bądź przygotowane do przetłumaczenia na język angielski, Na końcu prosimy umieścić przeznaczoną do publikacji informację o miejscu pracy Autora (tzw. afiliację) i adres kontaktowy (najlepiej elektroniczny).

● Nie należy stosować wersalików (oprócz cytatów z inskrypcji), automatycznej numeracji ani wyliczeń, hiperłączy, podkreśleń ani zaznaczeń barwnych oraz dzielenia wyrazów; prosimy też nie używać spacji do wyrównywania i rozmieszczania tekstu. Do konstruowania tabel prosimy używać edytora tabel (a nie tabulatora ani spacji).

● Przypisy umieszczamy u dołu strony (nie w tekście — nie dotyczy analogii katalogowych w opisach monet). W miarę możności ograniczamy się do przypisów bibliograficznych i unikamy komentarzy w przypisach.

● Adresy bibliograficzne w przypisach podajemy w formie tzw. oksfordzkiej (nazwisko autora, rok). Do tej samej formy w miarę możliwości sprowadzamy także cytowania katalogów w opisach monet. Pracę opatrujemy wykazem literatury na końcu. Tam adresy bibliograficzne rozwijamy do formy przyjętej w serii „Biblioteka Narodowa” wydawnictwa Ossolineum.

● W pracach przeznaczonych do publikacji w języku polskim obce alfabety transliterujemy w zapisie bibliograficznym stosownie do zasad Polskiej Normy (np. dla alfabetów słowiańskich PN-ISO 9-2000; zob. http://so.pwn.pl/zasady.php?id=629693); w pracach przeznaczonych do publikacji w językach obcych natomiast prosimy o stosowanie norm transliteracyjnych przyjętych w tych językach; dla języka angielskiego jest to system Biblioteki Kongresu, stosowany w miarę możliwości programu edytorskiego (http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/romanization/).

● W stosunku do dzisiejszych faktów stosujemy aktualne nazwy geograficzne (a nie, np., nazwy rosyjskie miejscowości na obszarach państw posowieckich poza Rosją; dotyczy to również streszczeń obcojęzycznych). Wskazane jest jednak stosowanie przyjętych spolszczeń i tradycyjnych zasad transkrypcji, ale wyłącznie w tekście głównym (nie w zapisie bibliograficznym); prosimy też pamiętać, by każda mniej znana nazwa była raz objaśniona w transliteracji, z podaniem przynależności administracyjnej. W opisie faktów historycznych stosujemy nazwy historyczne (więc Królewiec i Rychbach, a nie Kaliningrad i Dzierżoniów).

Ilustracje powinny stanowić osobne pliki (nie wmontowane w tekst):

● zdjęcia w formacie TIFF, w rozdzielczości co najmniej 300 dpi (najlepiej 600), na białym tle; druk jest czarno-biały;

● rysunki (szkice sytuacyjne, mapki) nie powinny być większe niż format druku jednej strony (12,5×19 cm).

● Ilustracje winny być opatrzone podpisami i oznaczone w tekście jako „ryc.”

PT. Autorów działu „Znaleziska” upraszamy o stosowanie komunikatów — tak dalece, jak to możliwe — do następującego schematu:

1. miejscowość, gmina i powiat (w aktualnym podziale administracyjnym!);

2. miejsce znalezienia;

3. data znalezienia;

4. okoliczności, osoba odkrywcy;

5. kontekst archeologiczny (w tym lokalizacja w obrębie grobu);

6. liczba znalezionych monet, razem czy pojedynczo;

7. sposób zabezpieczenia;

8. terminus post quem skarbu;

9. miejsce przechowywania monet;

10. wyliczenie odkrytych monet i możliwych obiektów towarzyszących (prosimy pamiętać o danych metrologicznych, zwłaszcza monet starożytnych i średniowiecznych, identyfikacji mennicy — jeśli mogą być różne — i podaniu analogii katalogowej);

11. ewentualny krótki komentarz.

Ceniona jest zwięzłość, a zawsze mile widziane będą ilustracje monet i szkice sytuacyjne.

Stosowanie się do powyższych zasad przyśpieszy publikację prac w czytelnej i satysfakcjonującej PT. Autorów formie.

Zasady autorstwa i odpowiedzialności:

Prace publikowane w „Wiadomości Numizmatycznych” muszą być podpisane przez osoby, które istotnie są ich autorami i odpowiadają za ich treść. Osoby, których udział w powstaniu zgłaszanej pracy jest znikomy (na przykład ograniczony do udostępnienia materiałów z badań) mogą być wymienione w podziękowaniach, nie mogą jednak figurować jako autorzy. W wypadku wątpliwości redakcja zwraca się z prośbą o określenie udziału w powstaniu pracy poszczególnych osób figurujących jako autorzy. Autorzy powinni też ujawniać w przypisie lub podziękowaniach informacje o osobach i instytucjach, które przyczyniły się do powstania pracy poprzez wkład merytoryczny, rzeczowy lub finansowy. Przypadki nierzetelności naukowej będą dokumentowane i ujawniane.

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more