Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Keywords
  • Date

Search results

Number of results: 5
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In these remarks I recall such views which pretended to be scientific or at least rational enough to give some acceptable arguments to support them. One of such notions is made by epicureic physicalism and the so called scientific racism. Not all assumptions of those notions or the conclusions drawn from them may be included in the pseudoscientific and irrational sphere. At least some of them may be said that they had made a testimony of science and rationality „designed” for the context of their times and when this time passed they still remain in social circulation it is worth to look how they present themselves today and what arguments speak for their prevailing.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Zbigniew Drozdowicz
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Instytut Kulturoznawstwa, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza, Poznań
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

These remarks are to be considered as a voice in the discussion not only on the historical role of the Catholic Church in culture but also on mistakes committed by its Magisterium of the Catholic Church such as absolutism, globalism, and intolerance. Certainly it can be called otherwise. The key issue is however at how we call it but if we consider it as major mistakes and if yes if we seek for such an explanation that will actually is an excuse. This is the case in the example of often recalled in these remarks “The history of the Catholic Church” by Marian Banaszak. I do represent another view than this author. Also not just than Banaszak himself but other authors as well who blame for the failures of Catholicism (including the decline of its decisive social role) all those but not the ones who make the key decisions within the Church.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Zbigniew Drozdowicz
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Instytut Kulturoznawstwa, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza, Poznań
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In these remarks I make the attempt to draw a picture of the tradition, as well the modern forms of panpsychism, parapsychology and psychoanalysis. What connects these notions is situating those notions either outside the disciplines or at least on the edge of them. The problem is not just the fact that they did experienced various transformations and some of them did get closer to the criteria of being scientific. And on other occasions they distanced themselves from those criteria. Another issue is the fact that these criteria also changed what was considered scientific in one period, in another was perceived as pseudoscience, quasiscience or even parascientific. It had and still has to this day an important influence on what is often higher regarded in social terms. ie. pseudo- and quasiscientific theories rather than real science.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Zbigniew Drozdowicz
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Instytut Kulturoznawstwa, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

One of the more sensitive and touchy fields in which a confrontation occurs of significantly different visions of reality is being made by the understanding and representing of heaven. In those remarks I recall the standpoint of Catholic theologians and some of the selected scholars representing natural sciences. However, even such selective comparison shows how great the differences are between the visions of heaven sketched by the theologians and those by the natural scientists. Although they were and still are tray representatives of natural sciences, who had found and still find even if not linking points connecting those radically different views of heaven, than at least some sort of compromise in acknowledging their validity. On the other hand even them admit that it requires the use of significantly different standards of validity in theology and natural sciences.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Zbigniew Drozdowicz
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Instytut Kulturoznawstwa, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The academic community was and still is a community of scholars taking various positions. Problematic was and still is the changing of ways we set these positions in both, in relation to a long lasting academic tradition and in a much shorter period of academic activity of particular scholars. Some of these ways did show in a greater extent its own usability and some in lesser. In these remarks I make the attempt to point out those who did work out well and in some way still do and which ones should be history by now. However it is not all. Relatively recently ways of positioning of scholars occurred that are in some perspectives innovative and widely applied (also in Poland). Nevertheless they do have in the academic millieu its followers and radical opponents. The bibliometric positioning of scholars is one of those ways.
Go to article

Bibliography

Abelard P. (1952), Historia moich niedoli, Warszawa: PIW.
Brzeziński J. (2021), Czy (i komu) potrzebne są czasopisma naukowe?, Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, nr 2/2021, s. 9–25.
Brzeziński J. (2015), Jeżeli oceniać (jednostki naukowe i badawcze), to JAK oceniać? Przeciwko IF, a za peer review, Nowotwory Journal of Oncology, t. 65, nr 6, s. 476–480.
Crombie A.C. (1960), Nauka średniowieczna i początki nauki nowożytnej, t. II, Warszawa: Instytut Wydawniczy PAX.
Drozdowicz Z. (2017), Stopnie naukowe za wdrożenia, Forum Akademickie 3/2017, s. 30–32.
Einstein A., Infeld L. (1959), Ewolucja fizyki. Rozwój poglądów od najdawniejszych pojęć do teorii względności i kwantów, Warszawa: PWN.
Heller M. (2014), Nowa fizyka i nowa teologia, Kraków: Copernikus Center Press.
Highfield R., Carter P. (1995), Prywatne życie Alberta Einsteina, Warszawa: Prószyński i S-ka.
Hübner P. (2021), Ludzie systemu, Forum Akademickie nr 11.
Le Goff J. (1997), Inteligencja w wiekach średnich, Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza Volumen, Dom Wydawniczy Bellona.
Kierul J. (1996), Izaak Newton. Bóg, światło i świat, Wrocław: Oficyna Wydawnicza Quadrivium.
Kołłątaj H. (1953), Raport z wizytacji Akademii Krakowskiej odbytej w r. 1777, [w:] Wybór pism naukowych, Warszawa: PWN.
Kramer B. (2015). Akademische Ramschwa, Der Spiegel. Archived from the original on 24 June 2018. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
Kulczycki E. (2017), Punktoza jako strategia w grze parametrycznej w Polsce, Nauka i Szkolnictwo Wyższe nr 1(49), s. 63–78.
Marenbon J. (1997). The Philosophy of Peter Abelard, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mosakowski R. (2002), Szkolnictwo wyższe w krajach Unii Europejskiej. Stan obecny i planowane reformy, Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Gdańskiej.
Noble K.A. (1994), Changing Doctoral Degrees: an International Perspective, Buckingham, Bristol: Society for Research into Higher Education: Open University Press.
Jamblich (1993), O życiu pitagorejskim, Wrocław: Epsilon.
Popper K.R. (2006), Społeczeństwo otwarte i jego wrogowie, t. 2, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Porfiriusz (1993), Żywot Pitagorasa, Wrocław: Epsilon.
Roemer R.Ch, Borchard R. (2015), Meanigful Metrics, Chicago, Illinois: The Association of College & Research Libraries, a division of the American Library Association.
Skoble A.J. (2019), Tenure: The Good Outweighs the Bad – A Surresponse to James E. Bruce, Journal of Markets & Morality, t. 22, nr 1: 207–210.
Structure of the U.S. Education System: Research Doctorate Degrees. U.S. Department of Education. Archived from the original on 27 January 2012. Retrieved 1 October 2021.
Towpik E. (2015), IF-mania: Journal Impact Factor jest właściwym wskaźnikiem oceniania wyników badań naukowych, indywidualnych uczonych ani ośrodków badawczych, Nowotwory Journal of Oncology, t. 65, nr 6, s. 465–475.
Trevelyan G.M. (1961), Historia społeczna Anglii. Od Chaucera do Wiktorii, Warszawa: PIW.
Tuora-Schwierskott E., Malicka A. (2015), Struktura szkolnictwa wyższego w świetle Ustawy o Szkolnictwie Wyższym w Republice Federalnej Niemiec, Przegląd Prawa i Administracji CIII, s. 301–318.
Walicki A. (2014), Odpowiedź na ankietę „Przeglądu Filozoficznego”, Przegląd Filozoficzny – Nowa Seria nr 1 (89).
Williams J. (2001) Arius: Heresy and Tradition. Eerdmans: Grand Rapids (MI).
White M., Gribbin J. (1998), Darwin. Żywot uczonego, Warszawa: Prószyński i S-ka.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Zbigniew Drozdowicz
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Instytut Kulturoznawstwa, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza, Poznań

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more