Babcock, M. K., & Freyd, J. J. (1988). Perception of dynamic information in static handwritten forms. The American Journal of Psychology, 101(1), 111–130.
Carlile, S., & Leung, J. (2016). The perception of auditory motion. Trends in Hearing, 20(1), 1-19.
Cattaneo, Z., Schiavi, S., Silvanto, J., & Nadal M. (2017). A TMS study on the contribution of visual area V5 to the perception of implied motion in art and its appreciation. Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(1), 59- 68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2015.1083968.
Chen, I. H., Zhao, Q., Long, Y., Lu, Q., & Huang, C. R. (2019). Mandarin Chinese modality exclusivity norms. PLoS ONE,14, e0211336. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211336
Filipović Đurđević, D. F., Popović Stijačić, M., & Karapandžić, J. (2016). A quest for sources of perceptual richness: Several candidates. In S Halupka-Rešetar & S. Martínez-Ferreiro (Eds.), Studies in language and mind (pp. 187–238). Novi Sad, Serbia: Filozofski fakultet uNovom Sadu.
Freyd, J. J. (1983a). Representing the dynamics of a static form. Memory & Cognition, 11(4), 342-346.
Freyd, J. J. (1983b). The mental representation of movement when static stimuli are viewed. Perception & Psychophysics, 33(6), 575- 581.
Futterweit, L. R., & Beilin, H. (1994). Recognition memory for movement in photographs: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 57(2), 163-179.
Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuro-psychology, 22(3), 455-479.
Getzmann, S., & Lewald, J. (2009). Constancy of target velocity as a critical factor in the emergence of auditory and visual representa-tional momentum. Experimental Brain Research, 193(3), 437–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1641-0
James, K. H., & Gauthier, I. (2006). Letter processing automatically recruits a sensory‐motor brain network. Neuropsychologia, 44(14), 2937– 2949.
Hubbard, T. L. (2005). Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the findings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 822-851.
Hubbard, T. L. (2018). Influences on representational momentum. In T. L. Hubbard (Ed.). Spatial Biases in Perception and Cogni-tion (pp. 121-138). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hubbard, T. L. (2019). Momentum-like effects and the dynamics of perception, cognition, and action. Attention, Perception, & Psycho-physics, 81(3), 2155–2170. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01770-z
Kim, C. Y., & Blake, R. (2007). Seeing what you understand: Brain activity accompanying perception of implied motion in abstract paintings. Spatial Vision, 20(6), 545–560.
Kourtzi, Z., & Kanwisher, N. (2000). Activation in human MT/MST by static images with implied motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(1), 48–55.
Langacker, R. W. (1986). Abstract motion. Proceedings of the 12th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (p. 455– 471). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. Langacker, R. W. (1999). Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Leyton, M. (1989). Inferring causal history from shape. Cognitive Science, 13(3), 357-387.
Longcamp, M., Anton, J. L., Roth, M., & Velay, J. L. (2003). Visual presentation of single letters activates a premotor area involved in writing. Neuroimage, 19(4), 1492– 1500.
Longcamp, M., Hlushchuk, Y., & Hari, R. (2011). What differs in visual recognition of handwritten vs. printed letters? An fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 32(8), 1250-1259.
Lorteije, J. A., Barraclough, N. E., Jellema, T., Raemaekers, M., Duijnhouwer, J., Xiao, D., et al. (2010). Implied motion activation in cortical area MT can be explained by visual low-level features. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(6), 1533-1548.
Lorteije, J. A., Kenemans, J. L., Jellema, T., van der Lubbe, R. H., de Heer, F., & van Wezel, R. J. (2006). Delayed response to animate implied motion in human motion processing areas. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(2),158–168.
Lorteije, J. A., Kenemans, J. L., Jellema, T., van der Lubbe, R. H., Lommers, M. W., & vanWezel, R. J. (2007). Adaptation to real motion reveals direction-selective interactions between real and implied motion processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(8), 1231–1240.
Matlock, T. (2004). The conceptual motivation of fictive motion. In G. Radden & R. Dirven (eds.), Motivation in Grammar, 221–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Matlock, T. (2010). Abstract motion is no longer abstract. Language and Cognition, 2(2), 243–260.
Matsumoto, Y. (1996). Subjective motion and English and Japanese verbs. Cognitive Linguistics, 7(2), 183–226.
Miklashevsky, A. (2018). Perceptual experience norms for 506 Russian nouns: Modality rating, spatial localization, manipulability, image-ability and other variables. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 47, 641–661.
Mishra, R. (2009). Interaction of language and visual attention: Evidence from production and comprehension. Progress in Brain Research, 176, 277–292.
Osaka, N., Matsuyoshia, D., Ikeda, T., & Osaka, M. (2010). Implied motion because of instability in Hokusai Manga activates the human motion-sensitive extrastriate visual cortex: An fMRI study of the impact of visual art. NeuroReport, 21(4), 264–267.
Pavan, A., Cuturi, L. F., Maniglia, M., Casco, C., & Campana, G. (2011). Implied motion from static photographs influences the perceived position of stationary objects. Vision Research, 51(1), 187-94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2010.11.004.
Rojo, A., & Valenzuela, J. (2003). Fictive motion in English and Spanish. International Journal of English Studies, 3(2), 123–150.
Saygin, A. P., McCullough, S., Alac, M., & Emmorey, K. (2010). Modulation of BOLD response in motion sensitive lateral temporal cortex by real and fictive motion sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(11), 2480–2490.
Sbriscia-Fioretti, B., Berchio, C., Freedberg, D., Gallese, V., Umiltà, M. A. (2013). ERP modulation during observation of abstract paintings by Franz Kline. PLoS One. 8(10):e75241. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0075241.
Senior, C., Barnes, J., Giampietro, V., Simmons, A., Bullmore, E. T., Brammer, M., et al. (2000). The functional neuroanatomy of implicit- motion perception or representational momentum. Current Biology, 10(1), 16–22.
Speed, L. J., & Majid, A. (2017). Dutch modality exclusivity norms: Simulating perceptual modality in space. Behavior Research Methods,49, 2204–2218.
Talmy, L. (1996). Fictive motion in language and “ception”. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel & M. F. Garrett (eds.), Language and Space, 211–276. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Thakral, P. P., Moo, L. R., & Slotnick, S. D. (2012). A neural mechanism for aesthetic experience. Neuroreport, 23(5), 310-313. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e328351759f.
Umilta', M. A., Berchio, C., Sestito, M., Freedberg, D., & Gallese, V. (2012). Abstract art and cortical motor activation: an EEG study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 311. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00311
Wallentin, M., Lund, T. E., Østergaard, S., Østergaard, L., & Roepstorff, A. (2005). Motion verb sentences activate left posterior middle temporal cortex despite static context. NeuroReport, 16(6), 649-652.
Williams, A. L., & Wright, M. J. (2010). Static representations of speed and their neural correlates in human area MT/V5. NeuroReport, 20(16), 1466–1470.
Winawer, J., Huk, A. C., & Boroditsky, L. (2008). A motion aftereffect from still photographs depicting motion. Psychological Science, 19 (3), 276–283.
Zhao, X., Wang, J., Li, J., Luo, G., Li, T., Chatterjee, A., Zhang, W., & He, X. (2020). The neural mechanism of aesthetic judgments of dynamic landscapes: an fMRI study. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 20774. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77658-y

Aziz-Zadeh, L., & Damasio, A. (2008). Embodied semantics for actions: Findings from functional brain imaging. Journal of Physiology, 102(1-3), 35–39.
Barsalou, L. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.
Binder, J. R., & Desai, R. H. (2011). The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(11), 527–536.
Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133-–187.
Fischer, M.H., & Zwaan, R.A. (2008). Embodied language: a review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 825–850. doi: 10.1080/17470210701623605.
Forbus, K. D., Gentner, D., & Law, K. (1994). MAC/FAC: A model of similarity-based retrieval. Cognitive Science, 19(2), 141–205.
Galinsky, A. D., & Glucksberg, S. (2001). Inhibition of the literal: Metaphors and idioms as judgmental primes. Social Cognition, 18(1), 35–54.
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155–170.
Gernsbacher, M. A., Keysar, B., & Robertson, R. R. (1995). The role of suppression in metaphor interpretation. Paper presented at 36th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles.
Gibbs, R., Gould, J., & Andric, M. (2006). Imagining metaphorical actions: Embodied simulations make the impossible plausible. Imagination, Cognition, & Personality, 25(3), 221–238.
Gibbs, R. (2006). Embodiment and Cognitive Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H, L. (2012). Interpreting Figurative Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Giora, R. (1997). Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics, 8(3), 183–206.
Glucksberg, S., Newsome, M. R., & Goldvarg, Y. (2001). Inhibition of the literal: Filtering metaphor-irrelevant information during metaphor comprehension. Metaphor & Symbol, 16(3-4), 277–293.
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., &, Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41(2), 301–307. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00838-9.
Jamrozik, A., McQuire, M., Cardillo, E., & Chatterjee, A. (2016). Metaphor: Bridging embodiment to abstraction, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1080–1089.
Khatin-Zadeh, O., & Khoshsima, H. (2021). Homo-schematic metaphors: A study of metaphor comprehension in three different priming conditions. Journal of Psycholinguist Research, 50(4), 923–948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09754-z
Khatin-Zadeh, O., Khoshsima, H., Yarahmadzehi, N., & Marmolejo- Ramos, F. (2019). The Impact of metaphorical prime on metaphor comprehension processes. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 39(3), 375–388.
Khatin Zadeh, O., Vahdat, S. (2015). Abstract and concrete representa-tions in structure-mapping and class-inclusion. Journal of Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 2(2), 349-360.
King, B. (1989). The Conceptual structure of emotional experience in Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.
Klatzky, R. Pellegrino, J. McCloskey, B., & Doherty, S. (1989). Can you squeeze a tomato? The role of motor representations in semant-ic sensibility judgments. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(1), 56–77.
Kövecses, Z. (1986). Metaphors of Anger, Pride, and Love: A Lexical Approach to the Study of Concepts. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1987). The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In D. Holland and N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 195–221). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. & Tumer, M. (1989). More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we Live by. London: University of Chicago Press.
Matsuki, K. (1995). Metaphors of anger in Japanese. In J. R. Taylor and R. MacLaury (Eds.), Language and the cognitive construal of the world (pp. 137–151). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Micholajczuk, A. (1998). The metonymic and metaphoric conceptualization of anger in Polish. In A. Athanasiadou and E. Tabakowska (Eds.), Speaking of emotions: Conceptualization and expression (pp. 153–191). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Nie, Y., & Chen, R. (2008). WATER metaphors and metonymies in Chinese: A semantic network. Pragmatics & Cognition, 16(3), 492–516.
Sweetser, E. (1990). From Etymology to Pragmatics: The Mind-as-body Metaphor in Semantic Structure and Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, J., & Mbense, T. (1998). Red dogs and rotten mealies: How Zulus talk about anger. In A. Athanasiadou and E. Tabakowska (Eds.), Speaking of emotions: Conceptualization and expression (pp. 191– 226). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Turner, M. (1987). Death is the Mother of Beauty: Mind, Metaphor, Criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Turner, M. (1991). Reading Minds: The Study of English in the Age of Cognitive Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Watson, C.E., Cardillo, E.R., Ianni, G.R., & Chatterjee, A. (2013). Action concepts in the brain: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 1191–1205. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00401.
Wilson, N., & Gibbs, R. (2007). Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science, 31(4), 721–731.
Wolff, P., & Gentner, D. (2011). Structure-mapping in metaphor comprehension, Cognitive Science, 35 (8), 1456–1488.
Yu, N. (1998). The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor: A Perspective from Chinese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.