Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 2
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The raw material economy determines energy security for individual countries in the world. Coal is one of the most important energy carriers for electricity production and heat generation. World market trends of fossil raw materials such as hard coal and lignite were presented. In the European Union a significant decrease in coal and lignite consumption has been observed in recent years. This situation is primarily related to the accelerating decarbonisation policy and support of renewable energy sources, which are considered to be environmentally friendly. The pandemic occurring in recent years has also played an important role in shaping the raw materials market. The author shows the possibilities and directions in which the coal economy has prospects for development and expansion. The amount of the world’s coal resources is presented, as well as the size of the global consumption of the raw material in the 2000–2011 years, specifying in China, India, Asia, the USA and the countries of the European Union. The structure of the coal economy is presented in the light of the policies and laws enacted by the European Union Comission, in particular in Poland, Germany and France. The appearance of the hard coal sector and lignite sector in Poland is described in detail. The size of resources was given in terms of coal classification. The presented data were based on a range of information and reports from world organizations such as the International Energy Agency or British Petroleum.
Go to article

Bibliography


AGEB 2021 – Energy Consumption in Germany 2020. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Energiebilanzen 2021. [Online] https://ag-energiebilanzen.de/4-1-Home.html [Accessed: 2021-05-01].

ARE 2009–2019 – Energy Situation in Poland National Energy Balance 4th Quarter 2009–2019 (Sytuacja Energetyczna w Polsce Krajowy Bilans Energii IV Kwartał 2009–2019) Agencja Rynku Energii (in Polish).

Blaschke, W. and Ozga-Blaschke, U. 2015 – Coking coal as a critical raw material in the EU (Węgiel koksowy surowcem krytycznym w UE). Zeszyty Naukowe IGSMiE PAN 90, pp. 131–143 (in Polish).

BP 2002 – BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2002, June 2002. [Online] https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html [Accessed: 2021-05-01].

BP 2020 – BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2020, June 2020. [Online] https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html [Accessed: 2021-05-01].

Central Statistical Office 2020 – Employment and Wages in the National Economy in 2019 (Zatrudnienie i wynagrodzenia w gospodarce narodowej w 2019 r.). [Online] https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/rynek-pracy/pracujacy-zatrudnieni-wynagrodzenia-koszty-pracy/zatrudnienie-i-wynagrodzenia-w-gospodarce-narodowej -w-2019-roku,1,37.html [Accessed: 2021-05-01] (in Polish).

Euracoal 2006–2020 – Euracoal Market Report. Editions from the years 2006–2020. [Online] https://euracoal.eu/ [Accessed: 2021-06-04].

Euracoal Statistics 2012–2020 – Coal and lignite production and imports in Europe [Online] https://euracoal.eu/info/euracoal-eu-statistics/ [Accessed: 2021-06-04].

European Commission 2020 – A More Ambitious Climate Goal for Europe by 2030 Investing in a Climate Neutral Future for the Benefit of Citizens. [Online] https://ec.europa.eu/ [Accessed: 2021-06-25].

France 2021 – France energy report May 2021. [Online] https://www.enerdata.net/estore/country-profiles/france.html [Accessed: 2021-06-25].

IEA 2021 – Global Energy Review 2021 Assessing the effects of economic recoveries on global energy demand and CO2 emissions in 2021 International Energy Agency 2021. [Online] https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2021 [Accessed: 2020-07-24].

IEEFA 2020 – Coal-fired electricity generation in France fell 72% in 2019. Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis [Online]: https://ieefa.org/coal-fired-electricity-generation-in-france-fell-72-in–2019/ [Accessed: 2020-07-24].

Kasztelewicz et al. 2018 – Kasztelewicz, Z., Tajduś, A., Cała, M. Ptak, M. and Sikora, M. 2018. Strategic Conditions for the Future of Brown Coal Mining in Poland. Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 21(4), pp. 155–178. doi : 10.33223/epj/103691.

Kasztelewicz et al. 2018 – Kasztelewicz, Z., Ptak, M. and Sikora, M. 2018. Lignite as the Optimal Energy Raw Material for Poland (Węgiel brunatny optymalnym surowcem energetycznym dla Polski). Zeszyty Naukowe IGSMiE PAN 106, pp. 61–84. doi : 10.24425/124403 (in Polish).

KOBiZE 2019 – National emission balance of SO2, NOx, CO, NH3, NMLZO, dust, heavy metals and POPs for 2015–2017 by SNAP classification. Synthesis report, 2019 (Krajowy bilans emisji SO2, NOx, CO, NH3, NMLZO, pyłów, metali ciężkich i TZO za lata 2015–2017 w układzie klasyfikacji SNAP. Raport syntetyczny, 2019). Krajowy Ośrodek Bilansowania i Zarządzania Emisjami (KOBiZE), Instytut Ochrony Środowiska – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Warszawa 2019 (in Polish).

Krawczyk, P. 2020. Evaluation of the situation of hard coal mining in Poland in 2016–2018 using the public income balance method (Ocena stanu górnictwa węgla kamiennego w Polsce w latach 2016–2018 przy wykorzystaniu metody bilansu dochodów publicznych). Przegląd Górniczy 76(4), pp. 44–54 (in Polish).

Młynarski, T. 2014. Energy policy and security in France (Polityka i bezpieczeństwo energetyczne Francji). Teka Kom. Politol. Stos. Międzynar. – OL PAN, 9, pp. 51–62 (in Polish).

Ozga-Blashke, U. 2020. Coking coal in the European green deal strategy. Inżynieria Mineralna 2(2), pp. 87–93.

PEP2040 project – Energy Policy of Poland until 2040 – strategy of fuel and energy sector development (Polityka energetyczna Polski do 2040 r. – strategia rozwoju sektora paliwowo-energetycznego). Warszawa: Ministerstwo Energii, 2019 (in Polish).

PEP2040 – Energy Policy of Poland until 2040 – strategy of fuel and energy sector development (Polityka energetyczna Polski do 2040 r.). Warszawa: Ministerstwo Energii, 2021 (in Polish).

Pepłowska et al. 2017 – Pepłowska, M., Gawlik, L. and Kryzia, D. 2017. Statistical analysis of the relationship between the economic condition of mining supporting companies and the condition of the hard coal mining industry (Analiza statystyczna zależności finansów przedsiębiorstw okołogórniczych od kondycji branży górnictwa węgla kamiennego). Przegląd Górniczy 73(11), pp. 15–22 (in Polish).

PIG-PIB 2020 – Balance of Mineral Reserves and Deposits in Poland As at 31 December 2019 (Bilans zasobów i złóż kopalin w Polsce wg stanu Na 31 XII 2019 r.) Warszawa 2020 (in Polish).

PN-G-97002: 2018-11 Hard coal – Classification – Types (PN-G-97002: 2018-11 Węgiel kamienny – Klasyfikacja – Rodzaje) (in Polish).

Ratajczak, T. and Hycnar, E. 2017. Supporting minerals in lignite deposits (Kopaliny towarzyszące w złożach węgla brunatnego). Kraków: MERRI PAS (in Polish).

SRP 2021 – List of exploration, appraisal and production licences for solid minerals (as at 30 June 2020) (Lista koncesji poszukiwawczych, rozpoznawczych oraz wydobywczych dot. kopalin stałych (stan na dzień 30 czerwca 2020 r.)) Serwis Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej [Online] https://dane.gov.pl/dataset/221,zestawienia-koncesji-udzielonych-przez-ministra-srodowiska/resource/25028/table?page=1&per_page=50&q=brunatny&sort= [Accessed: 2020-07-24] (in Polish).

Tajduś, A. 2021. „QUO VADIS” Polish mining? („QUO VADIS” polskie górnictwo?) Przegląd Górniczy 77(1–3), pp. 7–13 (in Polish).

Wasilewski, P. and Kobel-Najzarek, E. 1973. Structure and properties of hard coal (Budowa i własności węgla kamiennego). Gliwice: Wyd. PŚl (in Polish).

WEO 2019 – World Energy Outlook 2019. [Online] https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy--outlook–2019 [Accessed: 2020-07-24].

WEO 2021 – World Energy Outlook 2020. [Online] https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook–2020/ [Accessed: 2021-07-3].

Zhang et al. 2020 – Zhang, K., Yang, S., Liu, S., Shangguan, J., Du, W., Wang, Z. and Chang, Z. 2020 – New strategy toward household coal combustion by remarkably reducing SO2 emission. American Chemical Society Omega 5(6), pp. 3047–3054.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Monika Pepłowska
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper discusses the idea of combining a photovoltaic system with a heating film system to heat residential buildings. The analysis was performed for a newly built single-family house in Warsaw or its vicinity. The authors have selected the size of the photovoltaic installation, calculated the costs incurred by the user for the installation of a hybrid system, which were additionally compared to the cost of installing a gas installation (gas boiler) used for heating the building. The calculations were made for a single-family house with a usable area of 120 m2, the demand for utility energy for heating purposes in the newly built house was in the range of 10–50 kWh/m2/year. Based on the adopted parameters, the authors evaluated the economic efficiency of both investments (solutions) determining their net present values (NPV). The analysis takes the energy needed only for heating purposes into account.
NPV for a heating system with a gas boiler with an investment outlay EUR 8,000 for buildings purchased for utility energy in the amount of 20 kWh/m2/year and the price for natural gas EUR 0.04 /kWh will be EUR –10,500 (for 15 years, discount rate r = 3%). For the same thermal needs (energy required) of the building, NPV for heating films + photovoltaic (HF + PV) will amount to – EUR 8,100. Comparing the variants will get a EUR 2,400 higher NPV for HF + PV. With a utility energy demand for heating purpose of 50 kWh/m2/year and gas heating installation investment cost of EUR 7,000, the NPV for both variants will be equal for natural gas price = EUR 0.035/kWh.
Go to article

Bibliography

Chwieduk, D. 2009. Recommendation on modelling of solar energy incident on a building envelope. Renewable Energy 34(3), pp. 736–741.
Columbus Energy 2021. Photovoltaic. [Online] https://columbusenergy.pl/ [Accessed: 2021-02-15].
COM(2020) 562 final. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Stepping up Europe’s 2030 climate ambition. Investing in a climate-neutral future for the benefit of our people. [Online] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0562 [Accssessed: 2021- -05-14].
Gas boilers 2021. [Online] https://kotly.pl/kotly/ [Accessed: 2021-02-16].
Journal of Laws 2015, item 376. Ordinance of the Minister of Infrastructure and Development of February 27, 2015 On the methodology for determining the energy performance of a building or part of a building and energy performance certificates (Dz.U. 2015, poz. 376, Rozporządzenie Ministra Infrastruktury i Rozwoju z dnia 27 lutego 2015 r. W sprawie metodologii wyznaczania charakterystyki energetycznej budynku lub części budynku oraz świadectw charakterystyki energetycznej). Warszawa (in Polish).
JRC European Comission 2017. Photovoltaic Geographical Information System (PVGIS).
Koval et al. 2019a – Koval, V., Sribna, Y. and Gaska, K. 2019. Energy Cooperation Ukraine-Poland to Strengthen Energy Security. E3S Web of Conferences 132, DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/201913201009.
Koval et al. 2019b – Koval, V., Sribna, Y., Mykolenko, O. and Vdovenko, N. 2019. Environmentalconcept of energy security solutions of local communities based on energy logistics. 19th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2019, 19(5.3), pp. 283–290, DOI: 10.5593/sgem2019/5.3/S21.036. Kryzia, D. and Pepłowska, M. 2019. The impact of measures aimed at reducing low-stack emission in Poland on the energy efficiency and household emission of pollutants. Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 22(2), pp. 121–132, DOI: 10.33223/epj/109912.
Kryzia et al. 2020 – Kryzia, D., Kopacz, M. and Kryzia, K. 2020. The Valuation of the Operational Flexibility of the Energy Investment Project Based on a Gas-Fired Power Plant. Energies 13(7), DOI: 10.3390/en13071567.
Matuszewska et al. 2017 – Matuszewska, D., Kuta, M. and Górski, J. 2017. Cogeneration – Development and prospect in Polish energy sector. E3S Web of Conferences 14, 01021, DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/ 20171401021.
Ministry of Climate 2020. Ministry of Climate and Environment 2020. Poland’s energy policy until 2040 (Polityka energetyczna Polski do 2040 r.). [Online] https://www.gov.pl/web/klimat/minister- kurtyka-polityka-energetyczna-polski-do-2040-r-udziela-odpowiedzi-na-najwazniejsze-wyzwania- stojace-przed-polska-energetyka-w-najblizszych-dziesiecioleciach [Accessed: 2021-01-21] (in Polish).
Ministry of Development 2019. Typical Reference Year (Typowy rok referencyjny). [Online] https://archiwum.miir.gov.pl/strony/zadania/budownictwo/charakterystyka-energetyczna-budynkow/dane-do-obliczen-energetycznych-budynkow-1/ [Accessed: 2020-08-10] (in Polish).
Mirowski, T. and Sornek, K. 2015. Potential of prosumer power engineering in Poland by example of micro PV installation in private construction (Potencjał energetyki prosumenckiej w Polsce na przykładzie mikroinstalacji fotowoltaicznych w budownictwie indywidualnym). Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 18(2), pp. 73–84 (in Polish).
Natural Gas Price 2021. [Online] http://www.cena-pradu.pl/gaz.html [Accessed: 2021-02-15].
Shmygol et al. 2020 – Shmygol, N., Schiavone, F., Trokhymets, O., Pawliszczy, D., Koval, V., Zavgorodniy, R. and Vorfolomeiev, A. 2020. Model for assessing and implementing resource-efficient strategy of industry. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2713.
Szurlej et al. 2014 – Szurlej, A., Kamiński, J., Janusz, P., Iwicki, K. and Mirowski, T. 2014. Gas-fired power generation in Poland and energy security (Rozwój energetyki gazowej w Polsce a bezpieczeństwo energetyczne). Rynek Energii 6, pp. 33–38 (in Polish).
Tytko, R. 2019. Heating the building by foil and electrical matts (Ogrzewanie budynku za pomocą folii i mat elektrycznych). Aura 8, pp. 18–21 (in Polish).
Żelazna et al. 2020 – Żelazna, A., Gołębiowska, J., Zdyb, A. and Pawłowski, A. 2020. A hybrid vs. on-grid photovoltaic system: Multicriteria analysis of environmental, economic, and technical aspects in life cycle perspective. Energies 13(15), 3978, DOI: 10.3390/en13153978.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Krystian Majchrzak
1 2
Monika Pepłowska
3
ORCID: ORCID
Piotr Olczak
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
  2. Instaway Institute, Warszawa, Poland
  3. Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more