Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Keywords
  • Date

Search results

Number of results: 3
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Recognition of geological structures often requires understanding the causes of diverse kinetic phenomenon and its underlying foundations. This pertains, e.g., to the phenomenon of mass movement within a rock formation leading to fault formation. We discuss here the possibility that variational calculus may be an important tool for investigating this problem. Analysis of variations may yield important information concerning a physical phenomenon. Here we will neglect the best known problems of extremals in the analysis of variations and will focus our attention on electromagnetic and physico-mechanical problems. Adaptation of a Hamiltonian as an entropy operator may serve, not only for the problems of singular crystalline structures, but also geological singularities such as faults, oleate impermeabilities, deep-seated eruptions as well as in problems of seismology, vulcanology and earthquakes. This paper is an attempt to initiate a discussion about the possible development of the ideas presented. It might be that the formulae presented will be useful for the solution of other geophysical problems in future.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Sylwia Tomecka-Suchoń
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to highlight the relationship between normative theory and social ontology through an analysis of John Rawls’s concept of ‘well‑ordered society’. By expressing the ontological assumptions underlying Rawls’s theory, it is possible to better understand the role of practices and institutions in A Theory of Justice and to counter some of the criticisms levelled against Rawls’s institutionalism. The proposed interpretation of Rawls’s theory may be recognized as a contribution to the interactionist approach in the field of social ontology.
Go to article

Bibliography

Berkey B. (2016), Against Rawlsian Institutionalism about Justice, „Social Theory and Practice” 42 (4), s. 706–732.
Ciszewski W. (2020), Rozum i demokracja. Wprowadzenie do koncepcji rozumu publicznego Johna Rawlsa, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
Cohen G.A. (1997), Where the Action Is: On the Site of Distributive Justice, „Philosophy & Public Affairs” 26 (1), s. 3–30.
Diver N. (2004), Institutions and Social Justice [nieopublikowana rozprawa doktorska], University of Pennsylvania.
Frega R. (2018), The Social Ontology of Democracy, „Journal of Social Ontology” 4 (2), s. 157–185.
Kwarciński T. (2006), Możliwości czy dobra pierwotne? Dyskusja Amartyi Sena z Johnem Rawlsem na temat właściwej przestrzeni sprawiedliwości, „Roczniki Filozoficzne” 54 (1), s. 81–106.
Mandle J. (2009), Rawls’s „A Theory of Justice”: An Introduction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mandle J., Reidy D.A. (red.) (2014), The Cambridge Rawls Lexicon, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Murphy L.B. (1998), Institutions and the Demands of Justice, „Philosophy & Public Affairs” 27 (4), s. 251–291.
Nozick R. (1974), Anarchy, State and Utopia, New York: Basic Books.
Pettit P. (2005), Rawls’s Political Ontology, „Politics, Philosophy & Economics” 4 (2), s. 157–174.
Pettit P. (2006), Rawls’s Peoples, w: R. Martin, D.A. Reidy (red.), Rawls’s Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley‑Blackwell, s. 38–55.
Rawls A. (2009), An Essay on Two Conceptions of Social Order, „Journal of Classical Sociology” 9 (4), s. 500–520.
Rawls J. (1955), Two Concepts of Rules, „The Philosophical Review” 64 (1), s. 3–32.
Rawls J. (2009), Teoria sprawiedliwości, przeł. M. Panufnik, J. Pasek, A. Romaniuk, S. Szymański, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Sen A. (2009), The Idea of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Wojciech Graboń
1
ORCID: ORCID
Marcin Woźny
2 3
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Uniwersytet Warszawski, Szkoła Doktorska Nauk Humanistycznych, ul. Krakowskie Przedmieście 26/28, 00‑927 Warszawa
  2. Uniwersytet Warszawski, Wydział Filozofii, ul. Krakowskie Przedmieście 3, 00‑927 Warszawa
  3. Uniwersytet Warszawski, Wydział Prawa i Administracji, ul. Krakowskie Przedmieście 26/28, 00‑927 Warszawa
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

An original method of skeletal system modelling is presented in detail. Using DICOM images obtained from CT and PET tests, shell models of nine bones were created (humerus, radius, ulna, scapula, clavicle, femur, tibia, fibula, pelvis). Two methods of bone behaviour are also proposed, the first method treating the bone as a solid structure and the second method treating the bone as a complex porous structure. The behaviour of model parts is numerically examined by using the finite element method.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Henryk Olszewski
Wiktoria Wojnicz
Edmund Wittbrodt

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more