Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 3
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

When the in-wheel motor is working, it will be affected by gravity, centrifugal force and electromagnetic force. These three kinds of mechanical loads will affect the mechanical stress characteristics of the in-wheel motor, and then affect the reliability of the in-wheel motor structure. In order to understand the influence of the above loads on the mechanical stress of the in-wheel motor, this paper takes a 15-kWbuilt-in permanent magnet in-wheel motor as the research object. Based on the establishment of the electromagnetic field and structure field coupling analysis model of the in-wheel motor, the mechanical stress of the in-wheel motor under different mechanical loads under rated and peak conditions are calculated and analyzed, and the influence of different mechanical loads on the stress and deformation of the in-wheel motor are studied. The research results show that, regardless of the rated operating condition or the peak operating condition, the in-wheel motor has the largest mechanical stress and deformation under the combined action of centrifugal force and electromagnetic force, and the smallest mechanical stress and deformation under the action of gravity only; under the same load (except for the case of gravity only), the stress and deformation of the in-wheel motor under the peak operating condition are larger than those under the rated operating condition; and the maximum stress and deformation of the in-wheel motor appear at the rotor magnetic bridge and the inner edge of the rotor, respectively, so the rotor is an easily damaged part of the in-wheel motor.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jie Xu
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Shandong University of Technology, School of Transportation and Vehicle Engineering, China
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The hydro-mechanical drawing combines conventional deep drawing and sheet hydroforming and is widely used in the automotive industry. In this study, we designed and fabricated an indigenous experimental set-up that is low cost, low weight and portable. This study investigated the deformation of sheet metals into hemispherical cup-shaped parts made of different materials, viz., aluminium 8011 alloys, copper C12200 and steel EN10130 alloys. The initial thickness of sheet metal was 0.4 mm, the most common thickness range used in automotive applications. The deformation behaviour in terms of dome height has been measured by varying the pressure of the fluids. Aluminium 8011 alloy sheets showed a maximum dome height of 11.46 mm at a pressure of 1.47 MPa with no rupture. Steel EN10130 sheets had a maximum dome height of 10.89 mm at a pressure of 9.31 MPa. It was concluded that the behaviours of materials are different in the hydro-mechanical drawing process than in mechanical tests. Copper C12200 sheet showed superior formability with a maximum dome height of 18.91 mm at a pressure of 7.06 MPa than other materials without fracture.
Go to article

Bibliography

[1] M.-G. Lee, Y.P. Korkolis, and J.H. Kim. Recent developments in hydroforming technology. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 229(4):572–596, 2015. doi: 10.1177/0954405414548463.
[2] C. Bell, J. Corney, N. Zuelli, and D. Savings. A state of the art review of hydroforming technology. International Journal of Material Forming, 13:789–828, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s12289-019-01507-1.
[3] F.T. Feyissa and D.R. Kumar. Enhancement of drawability of cryorolled AA5083 alloy sheets by hydroforming. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 8(1):411–423, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.02.012.
[4] L.H. Lang, Z.R. Wang, D.C. Kang, S.J. Yuan, S.H. Zhang, J. Danckert, and K.B. Nielsen. Hydroforming highlights: sheet hydro-forming and tube hydro-forming. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 151(1-3):165–177, 2004. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.032.
[5] K. Siegert, M. Häussermann, B. Lösch, and R. Rieger. Recent developments in hydroforming technology, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 98(2):251–258, 2000. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136 (99)00206-X.
[6] H. Hu, J.-F. Wang, K.-T. Fan, T.-Y. Chen, and S.-Y. Wang. Development of sheet hydroforming for making an automobile fuel tank. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 229(4):654–663, 2015. doi: 10.1177/0954405414554666.
[7] T. Nakagawa, K. Nakamura, and H. Amino. Various applications of hydraulic counter-pressure deep drawing. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 71(1):160–167, 1997. doi: 10.1016/S0924- 0136(97)00163-5.
[8] H. Amino, K. Nakamura, and T. Nakagawa. Counter-pressure deep drawing and its application in the forming of automobile parts. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 23(3):243–265, 1990. doi: 10.1016/0924-0136(90)90244-O.
[9] K. Nakamura and T. Nakagawa. Sheet metal forming with hydraulic counter pressure in Japan. CIRP Annals, 36(1):191–194, 1987. doi: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62583-9.
[10] S.H. Zhang, Z.R. Wang, Y. Xu, Z.T. Wang, and L.X. Zhou. Recent developments in sheet hydroforming technology. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 151(1-3):237–241, 2004. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.054.
[11] N. Abedrabbo, M.A. Zampaloni, and F. Pourboghrat. Wrinkling control in aluminum sheet hydroforming. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 47(3):333–358, 2005. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.02.003.
[12] M. Koç and O.N. Cora. Introduction and state of the art of hydroforming. In: M. Koç (editor), Hydroforming for Advanced Manufacturing, pages 1–29, Elsevier, 2008. doi: 10.1533/9781845694418.1.
[13] M. Chen, X. Xiao, H. Guo, and J. Tong. Deformation behavior, microstructure and mechanical properties of pure copper subjected to tube hydro-forming. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 731 (2018) 331–343. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2018.06.068.
[14] A.A. Emiru, D.K. Sinha, A. Kumar, and A. Yadav. Fabrication and characterization of hybrid aluminium (Al6061) metal matrix composite reinforced with SiC, B 4C and MoS 2 via stir casting. International Journal of Metalcasting, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s40962-022-00800-1.
[15] F. Hasan, R. Jaiswal, A. Kumar, and A. Yadav. Effect of TiC and graphite reinforcement on hardness and wear behaviour of copper alloy B-RG10 composites fabricated through powder metallurgy. JMST Advances, 4:1–11, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s42791-022-00043-5.
[16] K.S.A. Ali, V. Mohanavel, S.A. Vendan, M. Ravichandran, A. Yadav, M. Gucwa, and J. Winczek. Mechanical and microstructural characterization of friction stir welded SiC and B 4C reinforced aluminium alloy AA6061 metal matrix composites. Materials, 14 (11):3110, 2021. doi: 10.3390/ma14113110.
[17] L. Prasad, N. Kumar, A. Yadav, A. Kumar, V. Kumar, and J.~Winczek. In situ formation of ZrB 2 and its influence on wear and mechanical properties of ADC12 alloy mixed matrix composites. Materials, 14(9):2141, 2021. doi: 10.3390/ma14092141.
[18] S. Thiruvarudchelvan and F. Travis. An exploration of the hydraulic-pressure assisted redrawing of cups. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 72(1):117–123, 1997. doi: 10.1016/S0924-0136 (97)00138-6.
[19] J.B. Kim, D.W. Lee, D.Y. Yang, and C.S. Park. Investigation into hydro-mechanical reverse redrawing assisted by separate radial pressure—process development and theoretical verification. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 211(6):451–462, 1997. doi: 10.1243/0954405971516419.
[20] M. Janbakhsh, M. Riahi, and F. Djavanroodi. A practical approach to analysis of hydro-mechanical deep drawing of superalloy sheet metals using finite element method. International Journal of Advanced Design and Manufacturing Technology, 6(1):1–7, 2013.
[21] E. Karajibani, R. Hashemi, and M. Sedighi. Forming limit diagram of aluminum-copper two-layer sheets: numerical simulations and experimental verifications. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 90:2713–2722, 2017. doi: 10.1007/s00170-016-9585-1.
[22] S. Yaghoubi and F. Fereshteh-Saniee. An investigation on the effects of the process parameters of hydro-mechanical deep drawing on manufacturing high-quality bimetallic spherical-conical cups. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 110:1805–1818, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s00170-020-05985-5.
[23] Z.P. Xing, S.B. Kang, and H.W. Kim. Softening behavior of 8011 alloy produced by accumulative roll bonding process. Scripta Materialia, 45(5):597–604, 2001. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6462(01)01069- 7.
[24] A. Hasanbaşoğlu and R. Kaçar. Resistance spot weldability of dissimilar materials (AISI 316L–DIN EN 10130-99 steels). Materials & Design, 28(6):1794–1800, 2007. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2006.05.013.
[25] B. Meng and M.W. Fu. Size effect on deformation behavior and ductile fracture in microforming of pure copper sheets considering free surface roughening. Materials & Design, 83:400–412, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.067.
[26] A.G. Olabi and A. Alaswad. Experimental and finite element investigation of formability and failures in bi-layered tube hydro-forming. Advances in Engineering Software, 42(10):815–820, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.05.022.
[27] M. Rahimi, P. Fojan, L. Gurevich, and A. Afshari. Aluminium Alloy 8011: Surface characteristics. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 719–720:29–37, 2015. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.719-720.29.
[28] G. Pantazopoulos. Metallurgical observations on fatigue failure of a bent copper tube. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 9:270–274,2009. doi: 10.1007/s11668-009-9225-2.
[29] K.A. Annan, R.C. Nkhoma, and S. Ngomane. Resistance spot welding of a thin 0.7 mm EN10130: DC04 material onto a thicker 2.4 mm 817M40 engineering steel. Journal of Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 121(10):1–7, 2021. doi: 10.17159/2411-9717/1597/2021.
[30] T. Maki and J. Cheng. Sheet hydroforming and other new potential forming technologies. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 418:012117, 2018. doi: 10.1088/1757- 899X/418/1/012117.
[31] A.K. Sharma and D.K. Rout. Finite element analysis of sheet hydro-mechanical forming of circular cup. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209(3):1445–1453, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.03.070.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Binayak Nahak
1
ORCID: ORCID
Anil Kumar
2
ORCID: ORCID
Anshul Yadav
2
Jerzy Winczek
3
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology Allahabad, Prayagraj – 211004, India
  2. Kamla Nehru Institute of Technology, Sultanpur – 228118, India
  3. Częstochowa University of Technology, Częstochowa, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Modeling and numerical analysis of the design of building structures, their technology, organization and management methods of construction processes are the subject of the work of many scientists in Poland. Schedule designers try to best reflect the reality of construction projects with the available methods, although this procedure is not always successful. One of the scheduling methods is the Time Coupling Methods (TCM), which can be refined using the predictive durations of the Multivariate Method of Statistical Models (MMSM) construction processes and standard deviations. A new scheduling method in the probabilistic approach was developed – Probabilistic Time Couplings Method I (PTCM I). At PTCM I, work is organized in such a way as to maintain the continuity of work of employees, as downtime of workers is disadvantageous and costly. The total duration of the new investment was forecasted and compared with the other methods of scheduling and with real time after its completion. The results clearly show that the developed methodology can be successfully used in scheduling construction works.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Paulina Kostrzewa-Demczuk
1
ORCID: ORCID
Magdalena Rogalska
2
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Kielce University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Al. Tysiąclecia Państwa Polskiego 7, 25-314 Kielce, Poland
  2. Lublin University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Nadbystrzycka St. 40, 20-618 Lublin, Poland

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more