Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 3
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aims of this study were to evaluate the prevalence of Coxiella burnetii on both herd and animal level based on ELISA and PCR tests. Antibodies to C. burnetii were detected in 22 out of the 24 bulk tank milk samples (91.6%) tested by ELISA and the IS1111 element of C. burnetii was detected in 10 out of the 24 samples (41.6%) by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). ELISA testing showed individual seropositivity in 67 out of the 165 cows (40.6%) examined in 24 dairy cattle farms in different parts of the Czech Republic. Our study revealed that the prevalence of C. burnetii has increased substantially in the Czech Republic over the past 30 years, and that the causative agent is a potential risk factor for some reproductive problems in dairy farms and a possible risk factor for human infection.
Go to article

Bibliography


Agerholm JS (2013) Coxiella burnetii associated reproductive disorders in domestic animals - a critical review. Acta Vet Scand 55: 13.
Dobos A, Balla E (2021) Industrial dairy cattle farms in Hungary a source of Coxiella burnetii infection in humans. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 21: 498-501.
Dobos A, Gábor G, Wehmann E, Dénes B, Póth-Szebenyi B, Kovács ÁB, Gyuranecz M (2020a) Serological screening for Coxiella burnetii in the context of early pregnancy loss in dairy cows. Acta Vet Hung 68: 305-309.
Dobos A, Kreizinger Z, Kovács ÁB, Gyuranecz M (2020b) Prevalence of Coxiella burnetii in Central and Eastern European dairy herds. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 72: 101489.
Duron O, Sidi-Boumedine K, Rousset E, Moutailler S, Jourdain E (2015) The importance of ticks in Q fever transmission: what has (and has not) been demonstrated? Trends Parasitol. 31: 536-552.
ECDC (2019) European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Introduction to the annual epidemiological report. Q fever Annual Epide-miological Report. ECDC, Stockholm, 2019.
Eldin C, Mélenotte C, Mediannikov O, Ghigo E, Million M, Edouard S, Mege JL, Maurin M, Raoult D (2017) From Q fever to Coxiella burnetii infection: a paradigm change. Clin Microbiol Rev 30: 115-190
Enserink M (2010) Infectious diseases. Questions abound in Q-fever explosion in the Netherlands. Science 327: 266-267
Ghaoui H, Achour N, Saad-Djaballah A, Smai A, Temim S, Bitam I (2019) Between livestock’s and humans, Q fever disease is emerging at low noise. Acta Sci Microbiol 2: 104-132
Hubálek Z, Juricová Z, Svobodová S, Halouzka J (1993) A serologic survey for some bacterial and viral zoonoses in game animals in the Czech Republic. J Wildl Dis 29: 604-607.
Literák I (1990) Occurrence of Coxiella burnetii antibodies in cattle, sheep and small terrestrial mammals in the western region of Bohemia [Article in Czech]. Vet Med (Praha) 40: 77-80.
Literák I, Calvo Rodríguez B (1994) Latent Q fever in cattle in southern Moravia (Czech Republic). Cent Eur J Publ Health 2: 91-94.
Literák I, Kroupa L (1998) Herd-level Coxiella burnetii seroprevalence was not associated with herd-level bree- ding performance in Czech dairy herds. Prev Vet Med 33: 261-265.
Loftis AD, Reeves WK, Szumlas DE, Abbassy MM, Helmy IM, Moriarity JR (2006) Rickettsial agents in Egyptian ticks collected from domestic animals. Exp Appl Acarol 40: 67-81.
López-Gatius F, Almeria S, Garcia-Ispierto I (2012) Serolo- gical screening for Coxiella burnetii infection and related reproductive perfor-mance in high producing dairy cows. Res Vet Sci 93: 67-73.
Maurin M, Raoult D (1999) Q fever. Clin Microbiol Rev 12: 518-553.
Niemczuk K, Szymańska-Czerwińska M, Zarzecka A, Konarska H (2011) Q fever in a cattle herd and humans in the south-eastern Poland. Laboratory diagnosis of the disease using serological and molecular methods. Bull Vet Inst Pulawy 55: 593-598.
OIE (2018) Manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals. Volume 1, Part 3, Section 3. Chapter 3.1.16. Q fever. World Or-ganisation for Animal Health, 8th edition.
Patocka F, Kubelka V (1953) Studies on Q fever. Cesk Epidemiol Mikrobiol Immunol 2: 340-352.
R Core Team (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/
Řehácek J. (1987) Epidemiology and significance of Q fever in Czechoslovakia. Zbl Bakt Mikrobiol Hyg Ser A: Med Microbiol Infect Dis Virol Parasitol 267: 16-19.
Rodolakis A, Berri M, Hechard C, Caudron C, Souriau A, Bodier CC, Blanchard B, Camuset P, Devillechaise P, Natorp JC, Vadet JP, Arri-cau- Bouvery N (2007) Compa- rison of Coxiella burnetii shedding in milk of dairy bovine, caprine, and ovine herds. J Dairy Sci 90: 5352-5360.
Schimmer B, Schotten N, van Engelen E, Hautvast JLAP, Schneeberger M, van Duijnhoven YTHP (2014) Coxiella burnetii seroprevalence and risk for humans on dairy cattle farms, the Netherlands, 2010-2011. Emerg Infect Dis 20: 417-425.
Splino M, Beran J, Chlíbek R (2003) Q fever outbreak during the Czech Army deployment in Bosnia. Mil Med 168: 840-842.
Statni Veterinarni Sprava (2018) Official Veterinary Report of the Czech Republic [in Czech].
Szymańska-Czerwińska M, Galińska EM, Niemczuk K, Zasępa M (2013) Prevalence of Coxiella burnetii infection in foresters in the south-eastern Poland and comparison of diagnostic methods. Ann Agric Environ Med 20: 699-704.
van der Hoek W, Morroy G, Renders NH, Wever PC, Hermans MH, Leenders AC, Schneeberger PM (2012) Epidemic Q fever in humans in the Netherlands. Adv Exp Med Biol 984: 329-364.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

A. Dobos
1
I. Fodor
1
T. Tekin
2
D. Đuričić
3
M. Samardzija
4

  1. CEVA-Phylaxia Co. Ltd., Szállás u. 5, Budapest, H-1107, Hungary
  2. Ceva Animal Health Slovakia, Sro. Račianska 153, 831 53 Bratislava, Slovakia
  3. Mount-Trad d.o.o., Industrijska 13, 43280, Garešnica, Croatia
  4. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine University of Zagreb, Heinzelova 55, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of dietary zeolite clinoptilolite on re- productive performance, serum progesterone and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) concentra- tions in 78 Holstein Friesian (HF) cows during pregnancy and lactation. The cows were divided into two groups comprising 40 (control group; CON) and 38 (CPL group) cows. To assess repro- ductive performance of HF cows the following variables were registered: the interval from calv- ing to first insemination (days open to first service, DFS), the interval from calving to pregnancy (days open to pregnancy, DOP), and the number of services per pregnancy (NSP). The average values of progesterone (5.64±0.59 ng/mL vs. 5.16±0.64 ng/mL) were not statistically different (p<0.05) and IGF-1 levels (400.17±17.72 ng/mL vs. 348.36±20.39 ng/mL) were higher in the CON than in the CPL group which received 50 g of clinoptilolite twice a day. However, in the CPL group ovarian cyclity resumed on days 40 and 60 postpartum. In addition, DFS (p<0.05) and DOP (p>0.05) were shorter in the CPL than in the CON group (115.1±19.9 and 137.5±36.3 days vs. 124.2±17.3 and 143.8±33.5 days, respectively). During 305 days of lactation, milk production was higher in the CPL vs. CON (8325.5±628.8 kg vs. 8050±586.8 kg). The NSP was lower in the CPL than in CON group (1.91 vs. 2.14). The dietary clinoptilolite supplement had a positive in- fluence on milk yield, exhibited modulating effects on endocrine status of dairy cows, and im- proved reproductive performance, with the decreased NSP, and fewer DFS and DOP.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

D. Đuričić
S. Vince
M. Lojkić
S. Jelušić
R. Turk
H. Valpotić
D. Gračner
N. Maćešić
I. Folnožić
Z. Šostar
M. Samardžija

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more