Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 8
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper presents the modelling measurement results of the load-displacement relation for scaffold stands and bracings. In the case of stands, there are two sections of curves, i.e. a straight-line and curvilinear section, and in the case of bracings, two straight line sections as well as one curvilinear section are distinguished. As a result of analyses, it is concluded that the sections which can be approximated by means of linear functions should be distinguished in graphs, if possible. On the one hand, this results from the evaluation methods of scaffold components. Nevertheless, the determination of elastic-linear scope of components’ operation is useful in engineering practice during computer calculations. Moreover, the method of determining an intersection point between functions, approximating tests results, along with analysis of the impact of polynomial degree, approximating the research results, on the time and effectiveness of the process of approximating functions selection, are all demonstrated in this article. The proposed method can prove useful in all science fields where curves obtained from any research (laboratory test, in situ test, numerical analysis) require approximation or replacement with a simpler description.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

E. Błazik-Borowa
J. Szer
A. Borowa
A. Robak
M. Pieńko
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper concerns an approach to model the ledger-stand joints of modular scaffolds. Based on the analysis of the working range of the ledger (represented by a linear relationship between load and displacement), two models of the ledger-stand joint are analysed: first – with flexibility joints and second – with rigid joints and with a transition part of lower stiffness. Parameters are selected based on displacement measurements and numerical analyses of joints, then they are verified. On the basis of performed research, it can be stated that both methods of joint modelling recommended in this paper, can be applied in engineering practices.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

E. Błazik-Borowa
M. Pieńko
A. Robak
A. Borowa
P. Jamińska-Gadomska
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article shows incidents associated with the use of gas as an energy carrier. It presents selected incidents which have occurred in Poland and around the world in recent decades. Based on this, consequences of gas and air mixture explosions were analysed as well. The article presents the main causes of gas incidents which have taken place, as per instances which are similar worldwide. Incidents associated with the use of gas are not frequent, but at the same time very tragic as they often lead to illness or even death. In Poland, in the last twenty years, construction area disasters caused by gas explosions account for only 5% of all which have occurred, but the number of fatalities resulting from these cases is approximately 14%. The number of individuals injured reached 39% of all construction disaster victims. Considering all these facts, it is necessary to undertake wide preventive measures in order to increase safety in the use of gaseous fuels.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

J. Szer
E. Błazik-Borowa
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Work in unfavorable, changing environmental conditions negatively affects people working on scaffoldings used on construction sites, which may increase the risk of occurrence of dangerous situations. The purpose of this article is to show the scale of temperature changes which workers are exposed to. The paper compares examples of temperature measurements obtained from a metrological station and during tests on scaffoldings located in the Lodz and Warsaw regions. This article also presents the methodology of examining environmental parameters of the surroundings where employees work on scaffoldings. Analysis results show that high temperatures and significant temperature variations frequently occur on the scaffoldings, which leads to a lack of adaptability and consequently to tiredness or decreased alertness. Unfavorable environmental conditions can lead to behaviors which, in turn, can cause accidents.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

I. Szer
E. Błazik-Borowa
J. Szer
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Scaffolding is equipment usually used at construction sites. A scaffolding structure is lightweight and made of elements used many times. The characteristics of scaffolding make it susceptible to dynamic actions present at the structure or occurring nearby. A scaffolding structure of medium size was subjected to analysis in this paper. The structure FEM model was loaded with single force harmonic excitation with various frequencies ranging from 1 Hz to 12 Hz applied in one of many selected points on the scaffolding façade. In the first step, natural frequencies and mode shapes of the analyzed structure were calculated. Then the full dynamic analysis was carried out to obtain maximum displacements of selected control points. The relation of excitation force frequency and location to the amplitudes of generated displacement was observed. It was found that low excitation frequencies close to the natural frequencies of the structure produced vibrations ranging to large areas of the scaffolding surface. Higher excitation frequencies are usually less propagated at the scaffolding but still may produce some discomfort to the structure users in the vicinity of the excitation force location. Scaffolding is equipment usually used at construction sites. A scaffolding structure is lightweight and made of elements used many times. The characteristics of scaffolding make it susceptible to dynamic actions present at the structure or occurring nearby. A scaffolding structure of medium size was subjected to analysis in this paper. The structure FEM model was loaded with single force harmonic excitation with various frequencies ranging from 1 Hz to 12 Hz applied in one of many selected points on the scaffolding façade. In the first step, natural frequencies and mode shapes of the analyzed structure were calculated. Then the full dynamic analysis was carried out to obtain maximum displacements of selected control points. The relation of excitation force frequency and location to the amplitudes of generated displacement was observed. It was found that low excitation frequencies close to the natural frequencies of the structure produced vibrations ranging to large areas of the scaffolding surface. Higher excitation frequencies are usually less propagated at the scaffolding but still may produce some discomfort to the structure users in the vicinity of the excitation force location.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jarosław Bęc
1
ORCID: ORCID
Ewa Błazik-Borowa
1
ORCID: ORCID
Jacek Szer
2
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Lublin University of Technology, Poland
  2. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environmental Engineering, Lodz University of Technology, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper presents analysis of the vibrational environment on scaffoldings. It is based on the results obtained in the project considering workers safety on scaffoldings. The total number of 120 façade scaffoldings was analysed over a period of two years. One of the issues considered in this project was the vibrations influence on scaffoldings and workers safety. The values of natural frequencies were obtained based on in-situ measurements of free vibrations. Analysis of the tests results made it possible to verify the elaborated numerical models. Values of natural frequencies and displacements in mode shaped from numerical modal analyses were compared with test results. Measurements of forced vibrations were also made with various sources of vibrations active at scaffoldings. The detailed numerical dynamic analysis was performed considering excitation forces variable in time. The obtained results were compared with allowable values according to the appropriate Polish standards. Most influential sources of vibrations for human comfort were indicated in the conclusions.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jarosław Bęc
ORCID: ORCID
Ewa Błazik-Borowa
ORCID: ORCID
Paulina Jamińska-Gadomska
Tomasz Lipecki
ORCID: ORCID
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper discusses service load measurements (weight of construction materials, small equipment and workers) conducted on 120 frame scaffoldings all over Poland in 2016‒2018. Despite the fact that the scaffolding should ensure the safety of its users, most accidents on construction sites are caused by fall from height. Service loads are one of the elements affecting the safety of scaffolding use. On the basis of the studies, maximum load on one platform and maximum load on a vertical scaffolding module for one day were obtained. They were treated as the random variables of the maximum values. Histograms and probability density functions were determined for these variables. The selection of a probability distribution consisted in the selection of a probability density function by means of fitting curves to the study result histograms using the method of least squares. The analysis was performed for distribution Weibull and Gumbel probability density functions which are applied for maximum values of random variables. Parameters of these functions can be used for the purposes of the reliability analysis to calibrate partial safety factors in simulation of service load during the scaffolding failure risk assessment. Besides, the probability of not exceeding the standard loads provided for frame scaffoldings for 120 weeks was established on the aforementioned basis. The results of the presented research show that in Poland there is a high probability of exceeding the permissible service loads in one year and thus there is a high risk of scaffolding damage.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1.  R.I. Harris and N.J. Cook, “The parent wind speed distribution: Why Weibull?”, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 131, 72‒87 (2014).
  2.  T.M. Lystad, A. Fenercib, and O.Øiseth, “Evaluation of mast measurements and wind tunnel terrain models to describe spatially variable wind field characteristics for long-span bridge design”, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 179, 558‒573 (2018).
  3.  J.A. Żurański, Effects of the climatic and topographic conditions on wind loads on building structures, Prace Naukowe Instytutu Techniki Budowlanej, Warsaw, 2005.
  4.  J.A. Żurański and A. Sobolewski, Snow loads in Poland in designing and diagnostics of structures, Prace Naukowe Instytutu Techniki Budowlanej, Warsaw, 2016.
  5.  P. Croce, P. Formichi, F. Landi, P. Mercogliano, E. Bucchignani, A. Dosio, and S. Dimova, “The snow load in Europe and the climate change”, Clim. Risk Manag. 20, 138‒154 (2018).
  6.  J. Blanchet, C. Marty, and M. Lehning, “Extreme value statistics of snowfall in the Swiss Alpine region”, Water Resour. Res. 45(5), W05424 (2009).
  7.  B. Ellingwood, T.V. Galambos, J.G. MacGregor, and C.A. Cornell, Development of a probability based load criterion for American National Standard A58, NBS Special Report 577, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, 1980.
  8.  R.B. Corotis and V.A. Doshi, “Probability models for live-load survey results”, J. Struct. Div. 103(6), 1257‒1274 (1977).
  9.  R.B. Corotis and V. Jaria, “Stochastic nature of building live loads”, J. Struct. Div. 105(3), 493510 (1979).
  10.  P.L. Chalk and R.B. Corotis, “Probability model for design live loads”, J. Struct. Div. 106(10), 2017‒2033 (1980).
  11.  A.S. Nowak and A.M. Rakoczy, “Uncertainties in the building process”, Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci. 61(1), 129‒135 (2013).
  12.  M.G. Stewart, “Optimization of serviceability load combinations for structural steel beam design”, Struct. Saf. 18(2/3), 225‒238 (1996).
  13.  V. Kamjoo and C.D. Eamon, “Reliability-based design optimization of a vehicular live load model”, Eng. Struct. 168, 799‒808 (2018).
  14.  Y. Liu, L. Liu, B. Stratman, and S. Mahadevan, “Multiaxial fatigue reliability analysis of railroad wheels”, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 93(3), 456‒467 (2008).
  15.  F. Schmidt, B. Jacob, and F. Domprobst, “Investigation of truck weights and dimensions using WIM data”, Transp. Res. Procedia 14, 811‒819 (2016).
  16.  A.S. Nowak, “System reliability models for bridge structures”, Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci. 52(4), 321‒328 (2004).
  17.  J. Bojórquez, S.E. Ruiz, B. Ellingwood, A. Reyes-Salazar, and E. Bojórquez, “Reliability-based optimal load factors for seismic design of buildings”, Eng. Struct. 151, 527‒539 (2017).
  18.  D. Sun, B. Chen, and S. Sun, “Study based on bridge health monitoring system on multihazard load combinations of earthquake and truck loads for bridge design in the southeast coastal areas of China”, Shock Vib., 829380, 1‒12 (2015).
  19.  M.G. Stewart, “Reliability-based load factor design model for explosive blast loading”, Struct. Saf. 71, 13‒23 (2018).
  20.  M.G. Stewart, M.D. Netherton, Y. Shi, M. Grant, and J. Mueller, “Probabilistic terrorism risk assessment and risk acceptability for infrastructure protection”, Aust. J. of Struct. Eng. 13(1), 1‒17 (2012).
  21.  EN 12811-1:2003. Temporary works equipment – Part 1: Scaffolds – Performance requirements and general design. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, 2003.
  22.  AS/NZS 1576.1. Scaffolding. Part 1: General requirements, Council of Standards Australia and Council of Standards New Zealand, Sydney, 2010.
  23.  29 CFR 1926. Safety and health regulations for construction. Scaffold Specifications, Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, https:// ecfr.federalregister.gov/current/title-29/subtitle-B/chapter-XVII (accesed April 2021).
  24.  P. Jamińska-Gadomska, J. Bęc, T. Lipecki, and A. Robak, “Verification of the façade scaffolding computer model”, Arch. Civ. Eng. 64 (1), 41‒53 (2018).
  25.  E. Błazik-Borowa, Loads and actions on scaffolding as engineering structures, Lublin University of Technology, Lublin, 2018, [in Polish].
  26.  H. Bojar, F. Silveira, M. Rebelo, E. Czarnocka, and K. Czarnocki, “Health behaviours in scaffold use risk assessment model – SURAM”, Ann Agric Environ Med. 26(1), 138‒142 (2019).
  27.  M. Jabłoński, I. Szer, and J. Szer, “Probability of occurrence of health and safety risks on scaffolding caused by noise exposure”, J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 24(6), 437‒443 (2018).
  28.  T. Lipecki, P. Jamińska-Gadomska, J. Bęc, and E. Błazik-Borowa, “Façade scaffolding behavior under wind action”, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 20, 27 (2020).
  29.  M. Pieńko, A. Robak, E. Błazik-Borowa, and J. Szer, “Safety conditions analysis of scaffolding on construction sites”, Int. J. Civ. Env. Eng. 12(2), 72‒77 (2018).
  30.  I. Szer, E. Błazik-Borowa, and J. Szer, “The influence of environmental factors on employee comfort based on an example of location temperature”, Arch. Civ. Eng. 63(3), 163–174 (2017).
  31.  B. Hoła and T. Nowobilski, “Analysis of the influence of socio-economic factors on occupational safety in the construction industry”, Sustain. 11, 4469 (2019).
  32.  E. Castillo, A.S. Hadi, N. Balakrishnan, and J.M. Sarabia, Extreme value and related models with applications in engineering and science, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, 2005.
  33.  M. Nagode and M. Fajdiga, “The influence of variable operating conditions upon the general multi-modal Weibull distribution”, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 64, 383‒389 (1999).
  34.  A.S. Nowak and K.R. Collins, Reliability of structures, Taylor & Francis Group, New York, 2013.
  35.  D. Pekasiewicz, “Analysis of chosen estimation methods of maximum statistic limit distribution parameters”, Quant. Meth. Econom. 16(4), 75‒84 (2015), [in Polish].
  36.  E. Błazik-Borowa, J. Szer, A. Borowa, A. Robak, and M. Pieńko, “Modelling of load-displacement curves obtained from scaffold components tests”, Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci. 67(2), 317‒327 (2019).
  37.  M.G. Stewart, “Effect of construction and service loads on reliability of existing RC buildings”, J. Str. Eng. 127(10), 1232‒1235 (2001).
  38.  Construction activity (Ruch Budowlany), General Office of Building Control, https://www.gunb.gov.pl/strona/ruch-budowlany, (accesed November 2020), [in Polish].
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ewa Błazik-Borowa
1
ORCID: ORCID
Michał Pieńko
1
ORCID: ORCID
Iwona Szer
2
ORCID: ORCID
Bożena Hoła
3
ORCID: ORCID
Krzysztof Czarnocki
4
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 40, 20-618 Lublin, Poland
  2. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Environmental Engineering, Lodz University of Technology, Politechniki 6, 90-924 Łódz, Poland
  3. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland
  4. Faculty of Management, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 38, 20-618 Lublin, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article analyses the changes occurring in accidents in the construction industry in Poland. It was analyzed the influence of the season on the number and structure of accidents. Research and analyzes were carried out on the basis of statistical data, made available by the Central Statistical Office, regarding accidents at work in construction that occurred in the period from 2010 to 2018. The total number of accidents at work in the construction sector in in these years shows a significant downward trend. A similar downward trend can also be seen in individual groups of accidents, broken down into light, serious and fatal. Based on the research carried out, the decisive impact of the season on the accident rates in construction sector was noticed. The smallest value of the accident frequency rate in most of the accident types considered can be observed in the winter season. In turn, the highest value of the light and fatal accident frequency rate can be observed in summer season (July - September). Weather conditions, for example, high temperatures and sunshine can lead to dangerous situations which can result in accidents at work. Climate conditions should therefore play an increasingly important role in assessing the risk of accidents.
Go to article

Bibliography


[1] G. S. Sorock, E. O. Smith and M. Goldoft, “Fatal occupational injuries in the New Jersey construction industry, 1983 to 1989”, Journal of Occupational Medicine, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 916–921, 1993, https://doi.org/10.1097/00043764-199309000-00015.
[2] S. Chi and S. Han, “Analyses of systems theory for construction accident prevention with specific reference to OSHA accident reports”, International Journal of Project Management, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1027–1041, Oct. 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.12.004
[3] R. M. Choudhry and D. Fang, “Why operatives engage in unsafe work behavior: Investigating factors on construction sites”, Safety Science, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 566–584, Apr. 2008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.06.027
[4] J. W. Garrett and J. Teizer, “Human factors analysis classification system relating to human error awareness taxonomy in construction safety,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 135, no. 8, pp. 754–763, Aug. 2009, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000034
[5] R. A. Haslam, S. Hide, A. Gibb, D. Gyi, T. C. Pavitt, S. Atkinson and R. Duff, “Contributing factors in construction accidents”, Applied Ergonomics, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 401–415, Ju. 2005, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2004.12.002
[6] S. Edwin, N. Shamil and F. Daniel, “Factors affecting safety performance on construction sites,” International Journal of Project Management, vo. 17, no. 5, pp. 309-315, 1999, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(98)00042-8
[7] T. Aksorn and B. H. W. Hadikusumo, “Critical success factors influencing safety program performance in Thai construction projects,” Safety Science, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 709–727, Apr. 2008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2007.06.006
[8] A. Carbonari, B. Naticchia, A. Giretti, and M. De Grassi, “A proactive system for real-time safety management in construction sites,” in 26th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC 2009), 2009, pp. 47-54, https://doi.org/10.22260/isarc2009/0006.
[9] P. M. Arezes and P. H. J. J. Swuste, “Occupational Health and Safety post-graduation courses in Europe: A general overview”, Safety Science, no. 50, vol. 3, pp. 433–442, March 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.10.003
[10] Z. Ismail, S. Doostdar and Z. Harun, “Factors influencing the implementation of a safety management system for construction sites,” Safety Science, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 418–423, March 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.10.001
[11] J. Hinze, C. Pedersen and J. Fredley, “Identifying root causes of construction injuries”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vo. 124, no. 1, pp. 67–71, Jan. 1998, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:1(67)
[12] E. Błazik-Borowa, K. Czarnocki, A. Dąbrowski, B. Hoła, A. Misztela, J. Obolewicz, J. Walusiak-Skorupa, A. Smolarz, J. Szer and M. Szóstak, Bezpieczeństwo pracy w budownictwie, Politechnika Lubelska, Poland, 2015.
[13] A. Hoła, B. Hoła, M. Sawicki and M. Szóstak, “Methodology of classifying the causes of occupational accidents involving construction scaffolding using Pareto-Lorenz analysis,” Applied Sciences, vol. 8, no.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/app8010048
[14] M. Rebelo P. Laranjeira, F. Silveira, K. Czarnocki, E. Blazik-Borowa, E. Czarnocka, J. Szer, B. Hola and K. Czarnocka, “Scaffold use risk assessment model: Suram”, in Occupational Safety and Hygiene VI - Selected contributions from the International Symposium Occupational Safety and Hygiene (SHO 2018, Taylor & Francis, 2018, pp. 335–340, https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351008884-59.
[15] K. Czarnocki, E. Czarnocka and K. Szaniawska, “Human factors as the main reason of the accident in scaffold use assessment,” International Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 107–114, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1316532.
[16] I. Szer, E. Błazik-Borowa, and J. Szer, “The Influence of Environmental Factors on Employee Comfort Based on an Example of Location Temperature,” Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 63, no. 3: pp. 163–174, 20 https://doi.org/10.1515/ace-2017-0035
[17] I. Szer, J. Szer, and B. Hoła, “Evaluation of climatic conditions affecting workers on scaffoldings”, in Advances and Trends in Engineering Sciences and Technologies III – Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Engineering Sciences and Technologies, ESaT 2018, M. A. Ali and P. Platko, Ed. CRC Press, 2019, pp. 603–609.
[18] Z. Traczyk and A. Trzebski, „Fizjologia człowieka z elementami fizjologii klinicznej i stosowanej”, PZWL, Warszawa 2004.
[19] E. Koehn and G. Brown, G. “Climatic effects on construction”, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 129–137, June 1985, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1985)111:2(129)
[20] A. Pekkarinen and H. Anttonen, “The comparison of accidents in a foreign construction project with construction in Finland”, Journal of Safety Research, vol. 20, no. 4, winter 1989, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4375(89)90028-5
[21] T. Kozłowska-Szczȩsna and E. Grzȩdziński, “The influence of atmospheric environment upon the occurrence of accidents among construction workers”, Energy and Buildings, vol. 16, no. 1–2, pp. 749–753, 1991, https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7788(91)90047-7
[22] F. Y. Y. Ling and M. Liu, Y. C. Woo, “Construction fatalities in Singapore,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 717–726, October 2009, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.11.002
[23] C. W. Liao, “Pattern analysis of seasonal variation in occupational accidents in the construction industry,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 29, pp. 3240–3244, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.473
[24] J. Dumrak, S. Mostafa, I. Kamardeen and R. Rameezdeen, “Factors associated with the severity of construction accidents: The case of South Australia,” Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, vo. 13, no. 4, pp 32–49, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v13i4.3620
[25] B. Pierce, “The Seasonal Timing of Work-Related Injuries October 2013,” no. October: 2371–2381, 2013, [Online]. Available: http://www.bls.gov/tus/
[26] K. Kang and H. Ryu, “Predicting types of occupational accidents at construction sites in Korea using random forest model,” Safety Science, vol. 120, December 2019, pp. 226-236, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.06.034
[27] W. L. Meng, S. Shen, and A. Zhou, “Investigation on fatal accidents in Chinese construction industry between 2004 and 2016,” Natural Hazards, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 655–670, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3411-z
[28] Ustawa z dnia 30 października 2002 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym z tytułu wypadków przy pracy i chorób zawodowych. z późn. zm. Dz. U. z 2017 r. poz. 1773, 2017.
[29] Central Statistical Office, 2010-2018. Employment, wages and salaries in national economy, 2010–2018. https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/rynek-pracy/pracujacy-zatrudnieni-wynagrodzenia-koszty-pracy/zatrudnienie-i-wynagrodzenia-w-gospodarce-narodowej-i-iv-kwartal-2010-r-,1,7.html
[30] J. Kowalski, „Analiza trendów wypadków przy pracy, chorób zawodowych i zagrożeń w środowisku pracy w okresie transformacji gospodarczej, Bezpieczeństwo pracy, vol. 12, pp. 14–17, 2001.
[31] Central Statistical Office, 2010-2018. Construction and assembly production, 2010–2018. https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/przemysl-budownictwo-srodki-trwale/budownictwo/produkcja-budowlano-montazowa-w-2019-roku,12,4.html
[32] Central Statistical Office, 2010-2018 Accidents at work in 2010–2018.
[33] T. Nowobilski and B. Hoła, “The Qualitative and Quantitative Structure of the Causes of Occupational Accidents on Construction Scaffolding,” Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 121–131, 2019, https://doi.org/10.2478/ace-2019-0023
[34] W. Drozd, “Cluster Analysis in Research of Accident Rate in Construction Sector,” Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 159–172, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2478/ace-2018-0036
[35] B. Hoła, “Methodology of estimation of accident situation in building industry”. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 19–46, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1644-9665(12)60038-7
[36] B. Fabiano, I. Parentini, A. Ferraiolo and R. A. Pastorino, “Century of accidents in the Italian industry: Relationship with the production cycle”, Safety Science, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 65–74, November 1995, https://doi.org/10.1016/0925-7535(95)00043-7
[37] X. S. Dong, S. D. Choi, J. G. Borchardt, X. Wang and J. A. Largay,. “Fatal falls from roofs among US construction workers”, Journal of Safety Research, vol. 44, pp 17–24, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2012.08.024
[38] B. W. J. Byung, S. Lee, J. H. Kim, R. M. A. Khan, “Trend Analysis of Construction Industrial Accidents in Korea from 2011 to 2015”, Sustainability, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1-12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081297
[39] B. Hoła, T. Nowobilski, I. Szer, and J. Szer, “Identification of factors affecting the accident rate in the construction industry”, Procedia Engineering, vol. 208, 2017, pp 35–42 [2nd International Conference on Innovative Solutions in Construction Engineering and Management – Flexible Approach], https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.018
[40] D. W. DeGroot and L. A. Pacha, “Cold Environment, chapter in Pfysical and biological hazards of the workplace”, Wiley, 2016.
[41] R. I. Eom and Y. Lee, “Working environments and clothing conditions in the construction industry”, Fashion and Textiles, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 9, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-019-0194-0
[42] F. E. Bird, “Management Guide to Loss Control”, Atlanta, Institute Press, 1974.
[43] H. W. Heinrich, “Industrial Accidents Prevention”, New York, Toronto, London, McGraw-Hill Book Company, INC, 1959.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Iwona Szer
1
ORCID: ORCID
Jacek Szer
1
ORCID: ORCID
Monika Kaszubska
1
ORCID: ORCID
Jakub Miszczak
1
ORCID: ORCID
Bożena Hoła
2
ORCID: ORCID
Ewa Błazik-Borowa
3
ORCID: ORCID
Marek Jabłoński
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Lodz University of Technology, Department of Building Materials Physics and Sustainable Design, Politechniki 6, 90-924 Łódź, Poland
  2. Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, pl. Grunwaldzki 11, 50-377 Wrocław, Poland
  3. Lublin University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, ul. Nadbystrzycka 40, 20-618 Lublin, Poland

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more