Abstract
Michael Burawoy’s idea of public sociology instigated a heated debate about the purpose of sociological research and bestowed its author an important place among contemporary social thinkers. The article presents the intellectual path that led Burawoy to formulate his well-known idea. Starting from his first book, he developed a coherent and original theory that was indebted to Marxism but was reaching beyond its horizons. Through grounding his conceptual work in sociological field research, Burawoy created his own understanding of such concepts as class, interest or production. By linking the participant observation of workplaces’ local regimes with the global political dynamics of social systems, the theory of sociological Marxism paved the way to formulating the new idea of sociology. Burawoy’s sociology aims at combining a realistic investigation in the interests and dispositions of social actors with utopian imaginaries of contemporary culture.
Go to article
Bibliography
1. Anderson, Perry. 1976. Considerations on Western Marxism. London: Verso.
2. Braverman, Harry. 1974. Labor and Monopoly Capitalism. New York: Monthly Review Press.
3. Burawoy, Michael. 1972. The Colour of Class on the Coper Mines. From African Advancement to Zambianization. Zambian Papers No. 7. Lusaka: University of Zambia.
4. Burawoy, Michael. 1979. Manufacturing Consent. Changing in the Labor Process under Monopoly Capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Burawoy, Michael. 1985. The Politics of Production. Factory Regimes under Capitalism and Socialism, Verso, London 1985.
6. Burawoy, Michael. 2003. For a Sociological Marxism: The Complementary Convergence of Antonio Gramsci and Karl Polanyi. Politics and Society, 31, 2: 193–261.
7. Burawoy, Michael. 2005. For Public Sociology. American Sociological Review, 70, 1: 4–28.
8. Burawoy, Michael. 2009. The Extended Case Method. Four Countries, Four Decades, Four Great Transformations and One Theoretical Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9. Burawoy, Michael, János Lukács. 1992. The Radiant Past. Ideology and Reality in Hungary’s Road to Capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10. Dunn, Elizabeth. 2004. Privatizing Poland: Baby Food, Big Business, and the Remaking of Labor. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
11. Esping, Andersen Gosta. 1990. Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
12. Fanon, Frantz. 1963[1961]. The Wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove Press.
13. Gdula, Maciej. 2015. Uspołecznienie i kompozycja. Dwie tradycje myśli społecznej a współczesne teorie krytyczne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.
14. Harvey, David. 2007. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Manza, Jeff, Michael A. McCarthy. 2011. The Neo-Marxist Legacy in American Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 37: 155–83.
16. Pawlak, Mikołaj. 2015. Ograniczenia rozwoju socjologii krytycznej. Próba alternatywnego wyjaśnienia. Stan Rzeczy, 08: 307–327.
17. Sztompka, Piotr. 2011. Another Sociological Utopia. Contemporary Sociology, 40, 4: 388–96.
18. Warczok, Tomasz, Tomasz Zarycki. 2014. (Ukryte) zaangażowanie i (pozorna) neutralność. Strukturalne ograniczenia rozwoju socjologii krytycznej w warunkach półperyferyjnych. Stan Rzeczy, 06: 129–158.
Go to article
en
pl
