Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 2
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Electric guitar manufacturers have used tropical woods in guitar production for decades claiming it as beneficiary to the quality of the instruments. These claims have often been questioned by guitarists but now, with many voices raising concerns regarding the ecological sustainability of such practices, the topic becomes even more important. Efforts to find alternatives must begin with a greater understanding of how tonewood affects the timbre of an electric guitar. The presented study examined how the sound of a simplified electric guitar changes with the use of various wood species. Multiple sounds were recorded using a specially designed test setup and their analysis showed differences in both spectral envelope and the generated signal level. The differences between the acoustic characteristics of tones produced by the tonewood samples explored in the study were larger than the just noticeable differences reported for the respective characteristics in the literature. To verify these findings an informal listening test was conducted which showed that sounds produced with different tonewoods were distinguishable to the average listener.
Go to article

Bibliography

1. Ahvenainen P. (2018), Anatomy and mechanical properties of woods used in electric guitars, IAWA Journal, 40(1): 106–S6, doi: 10.1163/22941932-40190218.
2. Ahmed S.A., Adamopoulos S. (2018), Acoustic properties of modified wood under different humid conditions and their relevance for musical instruments, Applied Acoustics, 140: 92–99, doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2018.05.017.
3. Bennett B. (2016), The sound of trees: wood selection in guitars and other chordophones, Economic Botany, 70(1): 49–63, doi: 10.1007/s12231-016-9336-0.
4. Carral S. (2011), Determining the just noticeable difference in timbre through spectral morphing: a trombone example, Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 97(3): 466–476, doi: 10.3813/AAA.918427.
5. Fleischer H., Zwicker T. (1998), Mechanical vibrations of electric guitars, Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 84(4): 758–765.
6. Fletcher N., Rossing T. (1998), The Physics of Musical Instruments, doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-21603-4.
7. Green D.M. (1993), Auditory Intensity Discrimination, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, Vol. 3, Springer, New York, doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-2728-1_2.
8. Jansson E.V. (1983), Acoustics for the Guitar Maker, Function, Construction and Quality of the Guitar, Publication No. 38 of the Royal Swedish Academy of Music, Stockholm.
9. Koch M. (2001), Building Electric Guitars: How to Make Solid-Body, Hollow-Body and Semi-Acoustic Electric Guitars and Bass Guitars, Koch Verlag, Gleisdorf.
10. Martinez-Reyes J. (2015), Mahogany intertwined: Enviromateriality between Mexico, Fiji, and the Gibson Les Paul, Journal of Material Culture, 20(3): 313– 329, doi: 10.1177/1359183515594644.
11. Ozimek E. (2002), Sound and its Perception. Physical and Psychoacoustic Aspects [in Polish: Dzwiek i jego percepcja. Aspekty fizyczne i psychoakustyczne], Polish Scientific Publishers PWN, Warsaw.
12. Paté A., Le Carrou J., Fabre B. (2013), Ebony vs. Rosewood: experimental investigation about the influence of the fingerboard on the sound of a solid body electric guitar, [in:] Proceedings of the Stockholm Musical Acoustics Conference (SMAC), Stockholm (Sweden), pp. 182–187.
13. Paté A., Le Carrou J., Navarret B., Dubois D., Fabre B. (2015), Influence of the electric guitar’s fingerboard wood on guitarists’ perception, Acta Acustica united with Acustica, 101(2): 347–359, doi: 10.3813/AAA.918831.
14. Puszynski J. (2014), String-wood feedback in electrics string instruments, Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW Land Reclamation, 2014(85): 196–199.
15. Puszynski J., Molinski W., Preis A. (2015), The effect of wood on the sound quality of electric string instruments, Acta Physica Polonica, 127(1): 114–116, doi: 10.12693/APhysPolA.127.114.
16. Schubert E., Wolfe J. (2006), Does timbral brightness scale with frequency and spectral centroid?, Acta Acoustica United with Acustica, 92(5): 820–825.
17. Torres J., Boullosa R. (2009), Influence of the bridge on the vibrations of the top plate of a classical guitar, Applied Acoustics, 70(11–12): 1371–1377, doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2009.07.002.
18. Torres J., Boullosa R. (2011), Radiation efficiency of a guitar top plate linked with edge or corner modes and intercell cancellation, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(1): 546–556, doi: 10.1121/1.3592235.
19. Tzanetakis G., Cook P. (2002), Musical genre classification of audio signals, 2002 IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 10(5): 293–302, doi: 10.1109/TSA.2002.800560.
20. Ulrich R., Vorberg D. (2009), Estimating the difference limen in 2AFC tasks: pitfalls and improved estimators, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71(6): 1219–1227, doi: 10.3758/app.71.6.1219.
21. Wilkowski J., Michalowski P., Czarniak P., Górski J., Podziewski P., Szymanowski K. (2014), Influence of spruce, wenge and obeche wood used for electric guitar prototype on selected sound properties, Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW. Forestry and Wood Technology, 85: 235–240.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jan Jasiński
1
Stanisław Oleś
1
Daniel Tokarczyk
1
Marek Pluta
1

  1. Department of Mechanics and Vibroacoustics, AGH University of Science and Technology, Cracow, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Energy production from renewable sources is one of the main ways to fight against global warming. Anaerobic digestion process can be used to produce biogas containing methane. In the light of the growing demand for substrates, a variety of raw materials are required. These substrates should be suitable for anaerobic digestion, and processing them need to provide the desired amount of energy.
This paper aims to discuss the agricultural biogas market in Poland, its current state, and the possibility of development during energy transformation, in particular in terms of using waste as a substrate for energy production. In February 2022, there were 130 agricultural biogas plants registered in Poland. On the other hand, in 2020, 4,409,054.898 Mg of raw materials were used to produce agricultural biogas in Poland. Among all the substrates used, waste played a special role.
With the right amount of raw materials and proper management of a biogas plant, it is possible to produce electricity and provide stable and predictable heat supply. Bearing in mind the development of the Polish and European biogas markets, attention should be paid to ensure access to raw materials from which chemical energy in the form of biogas can be generated. Due to limited access to farmland and the increasing demand for food production, one should expect that waste will be increasingly often used for biogas production, especially that with high energy potential, such as waste related to animal production and the meat industry.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Wojciech Czekała
1
ORCID: ORCID
Jakub Pulka
1
ORCID: ORCID
Tomasz Jasiński
2
Piotr Szewczyk
3
Wiktor Bojarski
1
Jan Jasiński
1

  1. Poznań University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Mechanical Engineering, Department of Biosystems Engineering, 50 Wojska Polskiego St, 60-627 Poznań, Poland
  2. WP2 Investments Sp. z o.o., Kąty Wrocławskie, Poland
  3. The Municipal Association “Clean Town, Clean Municipality”, Kalisz, Poland

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more