Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 12
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article presents the use of a multi-criterion Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to assess

geological and mining condition nuisance in longwall mining operations in selected coal mines in Poland.

For this purpose, a methodology has been developed which was used to calculate the operational nuisance

indicator (WUe) in relation to the cost of mining coal in individual longwalls. Components of the aggregate

operational nuisance indicator include four sub-indicators: the natural hazards indicator (UZN), an

indicator describing the seam parameters (UPZ), an indicator describing the technical parameters (UT)

and an environmental impact indicator (UŚ). In total, the impact of 28 different criteria, which formed

particular components of the nuisance indicators were analysed. In total 471 longwalls in 11 coal mines

were analysed, including 277 longwalls that were mined in the period of 2011 to 2016 and 194 longwalls

scheduled for exploitation in the years 2017 to 2021.

Correlation analysis was used to evaluate the relationships between nuisance and the operating costs

of longwalls. The analysis revealed a strong correlation between the level of nuisance and the operating

costs of the longwalls under study. The design of the longwall schedule should therefore also take into

account the nuisance arising from the geological and mining conditions of the operations. Selective

operations management allows for the optimization of costs for mining in underground mines using the

longwall system. This knowledge can also be used to reduce the total operating costs of mines as a result

of abandoning the mining operations in entire longwalls or portions of longwalls that may be permanently

unprofitable. Currently, underground mines do not employ this optimization method, which even more

emphasizes the need for popularizing this approach.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Eugeniusz Jacek Sobczyk
Michał Kopacz
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Hydrogen as a raw material finds its main use and application on the Polish market in the chemical industry. Its potential applications for the production of energy in fuel cell systems or as a fuel for automobiles are widely analyzed and commented upon ever more frequently. At present, hydrogen is produced worldwide mainly from natural gas, using the SMR technology or via the electrolysis of water. Countries with high levels of coal resources are exceptional in that respect, as there the production of hydrogen is increasingly based on gasification processes. China is such an example. There some 68% of hydrogen is generated from coal. The paper discusses the economic efficiency of hydrogen production technologies employing lignite gasification, comparing it with steam reforming of natural gas technology (SMR). In present Polish conditions, this technology seems to be the most probable alternative for natural gas substitution.

For the purpose of evaluating the economic efficiency, a model has been developed, in which a sensitivity analysis has been carried out. An example of the technological process of energy-chemical processing of lignite has been presented, based on the gasification process rooted in disperse systems, characteristics of the fuel has been discussed, as well as carbon dioxide emission issues. Subsequently, the assumed methodology of economic assessment has been described in detail, together with its key assumptions. Successively, based on the method of discounted cash flows, the unit of hydrogen generation has been determined, which was followed by a detailed sensitivity analysis, taking the main risk factors connected with lignite/coal and natural gas price relations, as well as the price of carbon credits (allowances for emission of CO2) into account.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Michał Kopacz
ORCID: ORCID
Radosław Kapłan
Krzysztof Kwaśniewski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This publication presents the research aimed at developing statistical models, on the basis of which it was possible to prepare credible forecasts of unit cost and coal net output for longwalls in 5 hard coal mines in P oland. The argument has been verified that there is a dependence between the level of nuisance and the level of costs, as well as longwall production results.

A research procedure has been developed for that purpose, which aimed at developing two statistical models connecting the nuisance due to geological and mining conditions with costs and longwall production results. The multiple linear regression technique has been used to develop statistical models. The set of data taken into account in the analyses comprised 120 longwalls mined in the years 2010–2019. Two models have been developed – one for forecasting unit costs, the other for forecasting coal net output. Subsequently, the models’ forecasting ability has been verified on a sample of historical data. A relative forecast error for 75% of observations has been in the range of (–25%; +37%). That result has been considered satisfactory. Subsequently, using those models, forecasts of unit costs and coal net output have been prepared for 220 longwalls planned for mining in the years 2020–2030. Those forecasts have been prepared in the stipulated ranges of geological and mining nuisance influencing mining process, by means of dedicated W Ue and W Ut factors. The nuisance models for forecasting purposes have been developed using the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) method. The research hypothesis has been confirmed on the basis of the obtained results. An increase in the level of nuisance leads to an increase in the unit costs for longwalls and the deterioration of production results. Unit operating costs for longwalls in specific ranges of nuisance may differ by up to 30%, being in the range of 52.0–120.3 zł/Mg. Likewise, the coal daily output of longwalls may be even 22% lower, having the average level in the range of 1.89–3.61 thousand Mg/d.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Eugeniusz Jacek Sobczyk
Andrzej Sokołowski
Michał Kopacz
ORCID: ORCID
Kamil Fijorek
Sabina Denkowska
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The subject of the research presented in this paper were financial results of mining industry enterprises (PKD 5 – P olish C lassification of A ctivity – “Mining of coal and lignite”) in 2007–2019. The research was conducted using relative and absolute financial measures, forming an extensive and coherent set of features characterizing their financial condition. The purpose was to measure and evaluate the efficiency of examined enterprises operation, considered as an attribute of development as well as factors describing and determining it. This evaluation was made against the background of ongoing restructuring processes taking into account their potential effects.

The article presents the course of the process of adapting P olish hard coal mining to market economy conditions after 1989. The process can be conventionally divided into several periods. The scope and intensity of changes in the mining industry followed the subsequent government programs for mining industry restructuring.

The lignite mining has not implemented any specific restructuring programs. The remedy processes were mainly related to organizational and ownership changes.

In relation to operation efficiency and value creation three turning points in the development path of enterprises were highlighted – 2011, 2015 and 2017, while the period of strong deterioration of results occurred in 2011–2015. I t was proved that restructuring processes did not affect the operating return on sales. However, there was a strong relation between changes in economic conditions on the coal market (prices) and the accumulation rate.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Eugeniusz Jacek Sobczyk
Jarosław Kaczmarek
Kamil Fijorek
Michał Kopacz
ORCID: ORCID
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper presents multi-criteria optimization method allowing for selection of the best production scenarios in underground coal mines. We discuss here the dilemma between strategies maximizing economic targets and rational resources depletion. Elaborated method combines different geological and mining parameters, structure of the deposit, mine’s infrastructure constrains with economic criteria such as the net present value (NP V), earnings before deducting interest and taxes (EBIT ) and the free cash flows to firm (FCFF). It refers to strategic production planning. Due to implementation of advanced IT software in underground coal mines (digital model, automated production scheduling) we were able to identify millions of scenarios finally reduced to a few – the best ones. The method was developed and tested using data from mine operation “X” (a real project – an example of a coking coal mine located in Poland). The reliability of the method was approved; we were able to identify multiple production scenarios better than the one chosen for implementation in the “X” mine. The final product of the method were rankings of scenarios grouped according to economic decision criteria. The best scenarios reached NP V nearly 50% higher than the Base Case, which held only 52. position out of 60. According to EBIT and FCFF criteria, 10 scenarios achieved results higher than the Base Case, but the percentage differences were very small, below 2 and 4%, respectively. The developed method is of practical importance and can be successfully applied to many other coal projects.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Michał Kopacz
ORCID: ORCID
Leszek Malinowski
Sylwester Kaczmarzewski
ORCID: ORCID
Paweł Kamiński
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The objective of the European Green Deal is to change Europe into the world’s first climate- -neutral continent by 2050. Therefore, European countries are developing technological solutions to increase the production of energy from renewable sources of energy. In order to universally implement energy production from renewable energy sources, it is necessary to solve the problem of energy storage. The authors discussed the issue of energy storage and renewable energy sources, reviewing applied thermal and mechanical energy storage solutions. They referred to the energy sector in Poland which is based mainly on mining activities. The method that was used in this paper is a review of thermal and mechanical energy storage solutions. In industrial practice, various solutions on energy storage are developed around the world. The authors reviewed those solutions and described the ones which currently function in practice. Hence, the authors presented the good practices of energy storage technology. Additionally, the authors conducted an analysis of statistical data on the energy sector in Poland. The authors presented data on prime energy production in Poland in 2004–2019. They described how the data has changed over time. Subsequently, they presented and interpreted data on renewable energy sources in Poland. They also showed the situation of Poland compared to other European countries in the context of the share of renewables in the final gross energy consumption.
Go to article

Bibliography

Abbas et al. 2020 – Abbas, Z., Chen, D., Li, Y., Yong, L. and Wang, R.Z. 2020. Experimental investigation of underground seasonal cold energy storage using borehole heat exchangers based on laboratory scale sandbox. Geothermics 87, 101837.
Agencja Rynku Energii SA 2020. Primary Energy Balance in 2004–2019 (Bilans Energii Pierwotnej w latach 2004–2019). Warszawa (in Polish).
Airly, 2020. Oddychaj Polsko. Raport o stanie powietrza. [Online] https://airly.org/pl/raport-jakosci-powietrza/ [Accessed: 2021-09-09].
Bartoszek et al. 2021 – Bartoszek, S., Stankiewicz, K., Kost, G., Ćwikła, G. and Dyczko, A. 2021. Research on Ultrasonic Transducers to Accurately Determine Distances in a Coal Mine Conditions. Energies 14(9), 2532.
Belu, R. 2019. Energy storage for electric grid and renewable energy application. In: Energy Storage, Grid Integration, Energy Economics, and the Environment. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp. 29–33.
Cabała et al. 2020 – Cabała, J., Warchulski R., Rozmus, D., Środek, D. and Szełęg, E. 2020. Pb-rich slags, minerals, and pollution resulted from a medieval Ag-Pb smelting and mining operation in the Silesian-Cracovian region (southern Poland). Minerals 10, p. 28.
Cader et al. 2021a – Cader, J., Koneczna, R. and Olczak, P. 2021a. The Impact of Economic, Energy, and Environmental Factors on the Development of the Hydrogen Economy. Energies 14(16), p. 4811.
Cader et al. 2021b – Cader, J., Olczak, P. and Koneczna, R. 2021b. Regional dependencies of interest in the “My Electricity” photovoltaic subsidy program in Poland. Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 24(2), pp. 97–116.
Ciapała et al. 2021 – Ciapała, B., Jurasz, J., Janowski, M. and Kępińska, B. 2021. Climate factors influencing effective use of geothermal resources in SE Poland: the Lublin trough. Geotherm. Energy 9, p. 3. CSO 2020. Energy from renewable sources in 2019. Warsaw.
Davies, R. 2020. Peak performance: could mountains create long-term energy storage? Power Technol. [Online] https://power.nridigital.com/future_power_technology_feb20/peak_performance_could_mountains_ create_long-term_energy_storage [Accessed: 2021-04-20].
Dychkovskyi et al. 2019 – Dychkovskyi, R., Tabachenko, M., Zhadiaieva, K. and Cabana, E. 2019. Some aspects of modern vision for geoenergy usage. E3S Web Conf. 123, 01010.
Dyczko, A. and Malec, M. 2021. Innovative Concept of Production Support System for the {LW} Bogdanka Mine. {IOP} Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1134, 12004.
Energy Instrat 2021. No Title. [Online] https://www.energy.instrat.pl [Accessed: 2021-03-23].
Euractive 2021. EU’s draft renewables law confirms 38–40% target for 2030. [Online] https://www.euractiv.com/section/energy/news/leak-eus-draft-renewables-law-confirms-38-40-target-for-2030/ [Accessed: 2021-05-18].
European Commission 2019. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. The European Green Deal. Brussels.
European Environmental Agency 2021. Share of energy consumption from renewable sources in Europe. EEA. [Online] https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/renewable-gross-final-energyconsumption-5/assessment [Accessed: 2021-06-21].
Frankowski, J. 2020. Attention: Smog alert! Citizen engagement for clean air and its consequences for fuel poverty in Poland. Energy Build. 207, 109525.
Gawlik, L. ed. 2013. Coal for the Polish energy sector in the perspective of 2050 – scenario analyzes (Węgiel dla polskiej energetyki w perspektywie 2050 roku – analizy scenariuszowe). Katowice: Górnicza Izba Przemysłowo-Handlowa (in Polish).
Graboś, A. and Żymanowska-Kumon, S. 2014. Counteracting low emissions in dense residential areas (Przeciwdziałanie niskiej emisji na terenach zwartej zabudowy mieszkalnej) [ed.] R. Sadlok. Bochnia: HELIOS (in Polish).
Gravitricity 2020. Gravitricity. [Online] https://gravitricity.com/ [Accessed: 2021-07-27].
Holder, M. 2020. Gravitricity to pilot £1m gravity-based energy storage system in Edinburgh. Bus. Green. [Online] https://www.businessgreen.com/news/4015015/gravitricity-pilot-gbp-gravity-energy-storage-edinburgh [Accessed: 2021-07-22].
Hunt et al. 2020 – Hunt, J.D., Zakeri, B., Falchetta, G., Nascimento, A., Wada, Y. and Riahi, K. 2020. Mountain Gravity Energy Storage: A new solution for closing the gap between existing short- and longterm storage technologies. Energy 190, 116419.
Hussein et al. 2004 – Hussein, H.M.S., Ahmad, G.E. and El-Ghetany, H.H. 2004. Performance evaluation of photovoltaic modules at different tilt angles and orientations. Energy Convers. Manag. 45, pp. 2441–2452.
Kadar, P. 2014. Pros and Cons of the Renewable Energy Application. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica 11(4), pp. 211–224.
Kamiński, P. 2021a. A New Method of Regulation of Loads Acting on the Shaft Lining in Sections Located in the Salt Rock Mass. Energies 14(1), p. 0042.
Kamiński, P. 2021b. Development of New Mean of Individual Transport for Application in Underground Coal Mines. Energies 14(7), p. 2022.
Kamiński et al. 2021 – Kamiński, P., Dyczko, A. and Prostański, D. 2021. Virtual Simulations of a New Construction of the Artificial Shaft Bottom (Shaft Safety Platform) for Use in Mine Shafts. Energies 14(8), 2110.
Kaszyński et al. 2019 – Kaszyński, P., Komorowska, A. and Kamiński, J. 2019. Regional distribution of hard coal consumption in the power sector under selected forecasts of EUA prices. Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi – Mineral Resources Management 35(4), pp. 113–134.
Klojzy-Karczmarczyk, B. and Mazurek, J. 2009. Local government responsibilities in the process of reducing low emission (Zadania samorządów lokalnych w procesie likwidacji niskiej emisji). Polityka Energetyczna 12(2.2), pp. 277–284 (in Polish).
Komorowska et al. 2020 – Komorowska, A., Benalcazar, P., Kaszyński, P. and Kamiński, J. 2020. Economic consequences of a capacity market implementation: The case of Poland. Energy Policy 144, 111683.
Kopacz et al. 2020 – Kopacz, M., Kulpa, J., Galica, D. and Olczak, P. 2020. The influence of variability models for selected geological parameters on the resource base and economic efficiency measures – Example of coking coal deposit. Resour. Policy 68, 101711.
Koval et al. 2019 – Koval, V., Sribna, Y., Mykolenko, O. and Vdovenko, N. 2019. Environmentalconcept of energy security solutions of local communities based on energy logistics. [In:] 19th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2019, International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference-SGEM. STEF92 Technology, 51 Alexander Malinov blvd, Sofia, 1712, Bulgaria, pp. 283–290.
Kryzia, D. and Pepłowska, M. 2019. The impact of measures aimed at reducing low-stack emission in Poland on the energy efficiency and household emission of pollutants. Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 22(2), pp. 121–132.
Kubiński, K. and Szabłowski, Ł. 2020. Dynamic model of solar heating plant with seasonal thermal energy storage. Renew. Energy 145, pp. 2025–2033.
Kwestarz, M. 2016. Thermal energy storage – types of energy storage (Magazynowanie ciepła – rodzaje magazynów). Czysta Energ. 12, pp. 29–35 (in Polish).
Mangold, D. and Deschaintre, L. 2016. Seasonal thermal energy storage. Report on state of the art and necessary further R+D. [Online] http://task45.iea-shc.org/data/sites/1/publications/IEA_SHC_Task45_ B_Report.pdf {accessed: 2021.09.09].
Matuszewska et al. 2017 – Matuszewska, D., Kuta, M. and Górski, J. 2017. Cogeneration – Development and prospect in Polish energy sector. E3S Web Conf. 14, p. 01021.
Matuszewska et al. 2020 – Matuszewska, D., Kuta, M. and Olczak, P. 2020. Techno-Economic Assessment of Mobilized Thermal Energy Storage System Using Geothermal Source in Polish Conditions. Energies 13(13), p. 3404.
Matuszewska, D. and Olczak, P. 2020. Evaluation of Using Gas Turbine to Increase Efficiency of the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC). Energies 13(6), p. 1499.
Mikhno et al. 2021 – Mikhno, I., Koval, V., Shvets, G., Garmatiuk, O. and Tamosiuniene, R. 2021. Green Economy in Sustainable Development and Improvement of Resource Efficiency. Cent. Eur. Bus. Rev. 10, pp. 99–113.
Mirowski et al. 2020 – Mirowski, T., Jach-Nocoń, M., Jelonek, I. and Nocoń, A. 2020. The new meaning of solid fuels from lignocellulosic biomass used in low-emission automatic pellet boilers. Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 23(1), pp. 75–86.
Mokrzycki, E. and Gawlik, L. 2013. Strategy for the security of energy resources in Poland-renewable energy sources. [In:] Environmental Engineering IV.
Olczak, P. and Komorowska, A. 2021. An adjustable mounting rack or an additional PV panel? Cost and environmental analysis of a photovoltaic installation on a household: A case study in Poland. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments 47, 101496.
Olczak et al. 2020 – Olczak, P., Matuszewska, D. and Kryzia, D. 2020. ”Mój Prąd” as an example of the photovoltaic one off grant program in Poland. Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 23(2), pp. 123–138.
Olczak et al. 2021a – Olczak, P., Jaśko, P., Kryzia, D., Matuszewska, D., Fyk, M.I. and Dyczko, A. 2021a. Analyses of duck curve phenomena potential in polish PV prosumer households’ installations. Energy Reports 7, pp. 4609–4622.
Olczak et al. 2021b – Olczak, P., Kryzia, D., Matuszewska, D. and Kuta, M. 2021b. “My Electricity” Program Effectiveness Supporting the Development of PV Installation in Poland. Energies 14(1), p. 0231.
Olczak et al. 2021c – Olczak, P., Olek, M., Matuszewska, D., Dyczko, A. and Mania, T. 2021c. Monofacial and Bifacial Micro PV Installation as Element of Energy Transition – The Case of Poland. Energies 14(2), p. 0499.
Orzeł, B. 2020. Non-financial Value Creation Due to Non-financial Data Reporting Quality. Zesz. Nauk. Organ. i Zarządzanie 148, pp. 605–617.
Palka, D. and Stecuła, K. 2019. Concept of technology assessment in coal mining. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 261, 012038.
Państwowy Instytut Geologiczny 2020. Balance of mineral deposits resources in Poland (Bilans zasobów złóż kopalin w Polsce). Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Geologiczny (in Polish).
Paszkowski, W. and Loska, A. 2017. The use of data mining methods for the psychoacoustic assessment of noise in urban environment. Int. Multidiscip. Sci. GeoConference SGEM 17, pp. 1059–1066.
Pedchenko et al. 2018 – Pedchenko, M., Pedchenko, L., Nesterenko, T. and Dyczko, A. 2018. Technological Solutions for the Realization of NGH-Technology for Gas Transportation and Storage in Gas Hydrate Form. Solid State Phenom. 277, pp. 123–136.
Possemiers, M. 2014. Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage under different hydrochemical and hydrogeological conditions. [Online] https://limo.libis.be/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=LIRIAS1930575&context= L&vid=Lirias&search_scope=Lirias&tab=default_tab〈=en_US&fromSitemap=1 [Accessed: 2021-09-09].
Rafał, K. and Grabowski, P. 2021. Energy storage (Magazynowanie energii). Academia – Mag. Pol. Akad. Nauk, DOI: 10.24425/academiaPAN.2021.136844 34–40 (in Polish).
REHAU 2011. Underground Thermal Energy Storage. Improving efficiency through seasonal heat storage. Canada.
Schmidt et al. 2018 – Schmidt, T., Pauschinger, T., Sørensen, P.A., Snijders, A., Djebbar, R., Boulter, R. and Thornton, J. 2018. Design Aspects for Large-scale Pit and Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage for District Heating and Cooling. Energy Procedia 149, pp. 585–594.
Soliński, J. 2004. Energy sector – world and Poland. Development 1971–2000, prospects to 2030. Statistics Poland 2019. Energia ze źródeł odnawialnych w 2018 roku. Informacje sygnalne. Statistics Poland 2020a. Energy 2020. Warszawa.
Statistics Poland 2020b. Energia ze źródeł odnawialnych w 2019 roku. Informacje sygnalne.
Stecuła, K. 2018. Decision-making Dilemmas in Mining Enterprise and Environmental Issues, i. e. Green Thinking in Mining. 18th Int. Multidiscip. Sci. Geoconference SGEM 2018, pp. 357–364.
Stecuła, K. and Brodny, J. 2017a. Perspectives on renewable energy development as alternative to conventional energy in Poland. [In:] International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM, pp. 717–724.
Stecuła, K. and Brodny, J. 2017b. Generating knowledge about the downtime of the machines in the example of mining enterprise. [In:] International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM, pp. 359–366.
Stecuła, K. and Brodny, J. 2018a. Role and meaning of coal mining in Poland. [In:] International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM. pp. 801–808.
Stecuła, K. and Brodny, J. 2018b. Decision-making possibilities in the field of excavated material quality shaping in terms of environmental protection, I. E. how to be greener in mining. [In:] International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM, pp. 243–250. Stecuła, K. and Tutak, M. 2018. Causes and effects of low-stack emission in selected regions of Poland. [In:] International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM, pp. 357–364.
Steinmann et al. 2019 – Steinmann, W.-D., Bauer, D., Jockenhöfer, H. and Johnson, M. 2019. Pumped thermal energy storage (PTES) as smart sector-coupling technology for heat and electricity. Energy 183, pp. 185–190.
Woźniak, J. and Pactwa, K. 2018. Responsible Mining – The Impact of the Mining Industry in Poland on the Quality of Atmospheric Air. Sustainability 10, p. 1184.
Wróbel et al. 2019 – Wróbel, J., Sołtysik, M. and Rogus, R. 2019. Selected elements of the Neighborly Exchange of Energy – Profitability evaluation of the functional model. Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 22(4), pp. 53–64.
Wyrwicki, G. 2004. Thermogravimetric analysis – unappreciated method for determination of rock type and quality (Analiza termograwimetryczna – niedoceniana metoda określania rodzaju i jakości kopaliny). Górnictwo Odkryw. 46, pp.120–125 (in Polish).
Żelazna et al. 2020 – Żelazna, A., Gołębiowska, J., Zdyb, A. and Pawłowski, A. 2020. A hybrid vs. on-grid photovoltaic system: Multicriteria analysis of environmental, economic, and technical aspects in life cycle perspective. Energies 13(15), p. 3978.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Artur Dyczko
1
ORCID: ORCID
Paweł Kamiński
2
Kinga Stceuła
3
Dariusz Prostański
4
Michał Kopacz
1
ORCID: ORCID
Daniel Kowol
4
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
  2. Faculty of Mining and Geoengineering, AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
  3. Przedsiębiorstwo Budowy Szybów SA, Tarnowskie Góry, Poland
  4. KOMAG Institute of Mining Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Increasing energy security in the face of rising energy demand and declining funding for fossil fuels has necessitated the diversification of energy supply and the shift to renewable energy. Sustainable management of energy supply is aimed at achieving a low-carbon intensity of production, especially in energy-intensive industries, including the mechanical-engineering industry. The article examines the possibility of shifting the current mechanical-engineering enterprise system and the technical, environmental and economic indicators of production to the new concept of the green economy, which will be an alternative to the further sustainable development of the industry. This article analyzes key approaches to energy conservation. An analytical model has been developed for calculating the energy risk of the mechanical-engineering enterprise and has built a context diagram of mechanical-engineering production, taking into account the environmental impact and the possibility of energy modernization, which allows the setting of strategic goals to ensure the sustainability of energy supply in the mechanical-engineering industry and develop the main principles of efficient enterprise activities in the context of increased risk. It has been proven that one of the criteria for increasing the profitability indicator is the adaptability of enterprises to external conditions and increasing alternative options for obtaining energy from our own autonomous sources.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Inesa Mikhno
1
Oksana Redkva
2
ORCID: ORCID
Viktoriia Udovychenko
3
ORCID: ORCID
Oksana Tsimoshynska
4
ORCID: ORCID
Viktor Koval
5
ORCID: ORCID
Michał Kopacz
6
ORCID: ORCID

  1. National Aviation University, Kyiv, Ukraine
  2. Technical College of Ternopil Ivan Pul’uj National Technical University Ternopil, Ukraine
  3. Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine
  4. Interregional Academy of Personnel Management, Kyiv, Ukraine
  5. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine
  6. Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The development of solar generation is an integral part of evaluating renewable “green” energy in accordance with the concept of sustainable development. This study focuses on the specifics of the implementation of solar energy in the context of the USA, the EU and China, taken as an object in connection with the specifics of the geographical-territorial and climatic-natural situation. The originality of the research lies in the approach of modelling the implementation of solar power generation with consideration to the main economic, technological, and resource factors. This study aims to assess trends in the development and implementation of regional solar power generation. Solar energy development is performed exclusively at the expense of private investment and state support is minimal. Therefore, the power of installed solar power plants relative to the amount of invested investments shows a high correlation. From the perspective of economic activity, solar energy in the analyzed regions is used by households in small amounts. The highest use of solar energy by households is in the USA, where this indicator is 8.3%, and the lowest is in China (0.13%). The analysis indicates that currently, solar energy is not a priority for developing the energy sector but is only a supplement. Further solar energy development is possible owing to technological innovations that will increase the efficiency of solar radiation use. The analysis also revealed the conclusion that the most powerful use of solar energy appears in China, with a figure of 19.6%, while the US has only 4.04% and the EU has almost 9%. According to the criterion of economic and technological influence on solar energy development, China occupies a leading position (9.89%), whereas the EU has only 0.03%. Thus, solar energy is currently not an attractive area for business and needs to prioritize the development of the EU economy, which is confirmed by insignificant investment flows compared to China and the USA.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Viktor Koval
1
ORCID: ORCID
Yevheniia Sribna
2
ORCID: ORCID
Vira Brednyova
3
ORCID: ORCID
Lyudmila Kosharska
4
ORCID: ORCID
Mykhailo Halushchak
5
ORCID: ORCID
Michał Kopacz
6
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Izmail State University of Humanities, Izmail, Ukraine
  2. National University of Water and Environmental Engineering, Ukraine
  3. Odessa State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Odesa, Ukraine
  4. Odessa National Maritime University, Odesa, Ukraine
  5. Ternopil Ivan Puluj National Technical University, Ternopil, Ukraine
  6. Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more