Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 1
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper presents an introduction to the method enabling the estimation of the range of investments necessary for the realisation of the mobility policy understood as the correction of the modal split into the sustainable proportion between car and non-car journeys. The models allow the calculation of the number of travellers required to shift into the public transport mode and the scale of selected investments including the development of the transport network, interchanges, rolling stock, and technical infrastructure. The basis of such calculations is the results of traffic surveys. The worldwide context of the study and similar actions are also presented. The paper consists of five sections. The first section contains a review of current problems connected with the sustainable mobility policy and the role of modal split. The second section focuses on the case study with the presentation of the local mobility policy and selected results of complex traffic surveys. The models used to estimate the investment challenges with exemplary calculations and presentation of similar effects of the intervention are described in the next section (3). Section four contains a discussion on the described methodology. The conclusions in section five end the main part of the paper.
Go to article

Bibliography


[1] Adkins A., Makarewicz C., Scanze M., Ingram M., Luhr G., “Contextualizing Walkability: Do Relationships Between Built Environments and Walking Vary by Socioeconomic Context?”, Journal of the American Planning Association Volume 83 (2017) Issue 3, pp. 296–314.
[2] Banister D. “The sustainable mobility paradigm” Transport Policy 15 (2008), pp. 73–80.
[3] Beirão G., Cabral J., “Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative study” Transport Policy 14 (2007): pp. 478–489.
[4] Cass N., Faulconbridge J. “Commuting practices: New insights into modal shift from theories of social practice “ Transport Policy 45 (2016), pp. 1–14.
[5] Cervero R., Denman S., Jin Y., “Network design, built and natural environments, and bicycle commuting: Evidence from British cities and towns”, Transport Policy 74 (2019), pp. 153–164.
[6] Comprehensive Traffic Analysis in Wrocław and Its Vicinity [Kompleksowe Badania Ruchu we Wrocławiu i otoczeniu], KBR 2018 http://bip.um.wroc.pl/artykul/565/37499/kompleksowe-badania-ruchu-we-wroclawiu-i-otoczeniu-kbr-2018
[7] Dingil A.E., Schweizer J., Rupi F., Stasiskiene Z. “Transport indicator analysis and comparison of 151 urban areas, based on open source data” Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 10 (2018), pp. 58–66.
[8] Fontoura W.B., Chaves G. de L.D., Ribeiro G.M., “The Brazilian urban mobility policy: The impact in São Paulo transport system using system dynamics”, Transport Policy 73 (2019), pp. 51–61.
[9] Goodman A., Jones A., Roberts H., Steinach R., Greny J. “ ‘We Can All Just Get on a Bus and Go’: Rethinking Independent Mobility in the Context of the Universal Provision of Free Bus Travel to Young Londoners” Mobilities, 2014 Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 275–293.
[10] Gori S., Nigro M., Petreli M., “The impact of land use characteristics for sustainable mobility: the case study of Rome” Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. (2012) 4: pp. 153–166.
[11] Haddad E.A., Lozano-Gracia N., Germani E., Vieira R.S., Nakamura S., Skoufias E., Alves B.B., “Mobility in cities: Distributional impact analysis of transportation improvements in Săo Paulo Metropolitan Region”, Transport Policy 73 (2019), pp. 125–142.
[12] Hymel K., “If you build it, they will drive: Measuring induced demand for vehicle travel in urban areas”, Transport Policy 76 (2019), pp. 57–66.
[13] Kruszyna M., Śleszyński P., Rychlewski J., “Dependencies between Demographic Urbanization and the Agglomeration Road Traffic Volumes: Evidence from Poland”, Land 10 (2021), pp. 47–69.
[14] Liu Y., Wang S., Xiea B., “Evaluating the effects of public transport fare policy change together with built and non-built environment features on ridership: The case in South East Queensland, Australia”, Transport Policy 76 (2019), pp. 78–89.
[15] Metz D., “Valuing transport investments based on travel time saving: Inconsistency with United Kingdom policy objectives”, Case Studies on Transport Policy 21 (2017), pp. 716–721.
[16] Mobility Policy of the City of Wrocław, Attachment to the Resolution of Wrocław City Council No XLVIII/1169/12, 19.09.2013, http://bip.um.wroc.pl/uploads/files/WPM_2013_ENGLISH.pdf
[17] Næss P. “Urban form and travel behavior: Experience from a Nordic context” The Journal of Transport and Land Use 5 (2012) no. 2, pp. 21–45.
[18] Phun V.K., Kato H., Chalermpong S., “Paratransit as a connective mode for mass transit systems in Asian developing cities: Case of Bangkok in the era of ride-hailing services”, Transport Policy 75 (2019), pp. 27–35
[19] Schneider R.J., “Theory of routine mode choice decisions: An operational framework to increase sustainable transportation”, Transport Policy 25 (2013), pp. 128–137.
[20] Sperry B. R., Dye T., „Impact of new passenger rail stations on ridership demand and passenger characteristics: Hiawatha service case study”, Case Studies on Transport Policy 8 (2020), pp. 1158–1169.
[21] Tang S., Lo H.K., “The impact of public transport policy on the viability and sustainability of mass railway transit – The Hong Kong experience”, Transportation Research Part A 42 (2008), pp. 563–576.
[22] Tight M. et al. “Visions for a walking and cycling focussed urban transport system” Journal of Transport Geography 19 (2011), pp. 1580–1589.
[23] Tyrinopoulos Y., Antoniou C., “Factors affecting modal choice in urban mobility” Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. (2013) 5: pp. 27–39.
[24] Williams D. G., Chatterton T., Parkhurst G., Spotswood F., “An assessment of Voluntary Travel Behaviour Change delivery in England as an alternative to highway construction”, Case Studies on Transport Policy 19 (2019), pp. 318–329.
[25] Yan X., Levine J., Marans R., “The effectiveness of parking policies to reduce parking demand pressure and car use”, Transport Policy 73 (2019), pp. 41–50.
[26] Zhang, W., Guhathakurta, S., Khalil, E.B., 2018. The impact of private autonomous vehicles on vehicle ownership and unoccupied VMT generation. Transport. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 90, pp. 156–165.
[27] Zhao X., Chen P., Jiao J., Chen X., Bischak C., “How does ‘park and ride’ perform? An evaluation using longitudinal data”, Transport Policy 74 (2019), pp. 15–23.
[28] Zhou, J., Schweitzer, L., 2011. Getting drivers to switch: transit price and service quality among commuters. Journal of Urban Planning and Development 137, pp. 477–483.
[29] Zhou J., “Sustainable commute in a car-dominant city: Factors affecting alternative mode choices among university students”, Transportation Research Part A 46 (2012), pp. 1013–1029.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Maciej Kruszyna
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more