Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 7
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Filtering Respiratory Protective Devices (FRPD) is not typically evaluated for exposure to volatile compounds, even though they significantly affect their protective performance. Such compounds are released into the atmosphere by industrial processes and pose serious health risks in people inhaling them. The adsorbent materials currently used to prevent those risks include activated carbon (AC). Zeolites and mesoporous silica materials (MCM) are very popular among the sorption materials. Due to their physical and chemical properties, they are able to adsorb significant amounts of volatile compounds from air. The melt-blown technology was used to produce filtering nonwovens with modifiers. As a result, polymer nonwoven structures with modifiers in the form of AC, zeolite (NaP1 type), molecular sieves (SM, SM 4Å) and mesoporous silica materials (MCM-41) were produced. The use of ACs (AC1 from Zgoda and AC2 from Pleisch) and their mixtures with others modifiers allowed to obtain satisfactory sorption, protective and utility properties. The longest breakthrough time against cyclohexane (approx. 53 min) was afforded by a variant containing AC, against ammonia (approx. 12 min) for the variant with AC2 and a mixture of AC2 and MCM-41. In the case of acetone vapor satisfactory breakthrough times were found for the variants with AC2 and AC1+SM (~20–25 min.). The present work deals with scientific research to improve workers’ and society’s health and safety by pursuing a better working life, and creating a safe social environment.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Anand, S.S., Philip, B.K. & Mehendale, H.M. (2014). Volatile Organic Compounds, [In] Wexler, P. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Toxicology (Third Edition), Academic Press, pp. 967-970, ISBN: 9780123864550, DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-386454-3.00358-4
  2. Amid, H., Maze, B., Flickinger, M.C. & Pourdeyhimi, B. (2016). Hybrid adsorbent nonwoven structures: a review of current technologies. Journal of Material Science, 51, pp. 4173-4200, DOI: 10.1007/s10853-016-9741-x
  3. Balanay, J.A.G., Bartolucci, A.A. & Lungu, C.T. (2014). Adsorption Characteristics of Activated Carbon Fibers (ACFs) for Toluene: Application in Respiratory Protection. Journal of Occupacional Environmental and Hygiene, 11, pp. 133-143, DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2013.816433
  4. Balanay, J.A.G. & Lungu, C.T. (2016). Determination of pressure drop across activated carbon fiber respirator cartridges. Journal of Occupational Environmental and Hygiene, 13, pp. 141-147, DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2015.1091960
  5. Baysal, G. (2019). Cleaning of pesticides from aqueous solution by a newly synthesized organoclay. Archives of Environmental Protection, 45(3), pp. 21–30, DOI: 10.24425/aep.2019.128637
  6. Brochocka, A., Nowak A., Panek, R. & Franus, W. (2019). The Effects of Textural Parameters of Zeolite and Silica Materials on the Protective and Functional Properties of Polymeric Nonwoven Composites. Applied Science, 9. pp. 515, DOI: 10.3390/app9030515
  7. Brochocka, A., Zagawa, A., Panek, R., Madej, J. & Franus, W. (2018). Method for introducing zeolites and MCM-41 into polypropylene melt-blown nonwovens. AUTEX Research Journal, DOI: 10.1515/aut-2018-0043
  8. Buonanno, G., Marks, G.B. & Morawska, L. (2013). Health effects of daily airborne particle dose in children: Direct association between personal dose and respiratory health effects. Environmental Pollution, 180, pp. 246-250, DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.05.039
  9. Buteau, S. & Goldberg, MS. (2016). A structured review of panel studies used to investigate associations between ambient air pollution and heart rate variability. Environmental Research, 148, pp. 207-247, DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.03.013
  10. Cerrillo, J.R., Palomares, A.E. & Rey, F. (2020). Silver exchanged zeolites as bactericidal additives in polymeric materials. Microporous and Mesoporous Material, 305, pp. 110367, DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110367
  11. Cheng, T., Jiang, Y., Zhang, Y. & Shuanqiang, L. (2004). Prediction of breakthrough curves for adsorption on activated carbon fibres in a fixed bed. Carbon, 42, pp. 3081-3085, DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.07.021
  12. Chiang, Y.C. & Juang, R.S. (2017). Surface modifications of carbonaceous materials for carbon dioxide adsorption: A review. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 71, pp. 214-234, DOI:10.1016/j.jtice.2016.12.014
  13. Commission Directive 2000/39/EC of 8 June 2000 establishing a first list of indicative occupational exposure limit values in implementation of Council Directive 98/24/EC on the protection of the health and safety of workers from the risks related to chemical agents at work, http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2000/39/2018-08-21
  14. Czuma, N., Zarębska, K. & Baran, P. (2016). Analysis of the influence of fusion synthesis parameters on the SO2 sorption properties of zeolites produced out of fly ash. SEED Science Research, 10, DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/20161000010
  15. Das, D., Vivekand, G. & Nishith, V. (2004). Removal of volatile organic compound by activated carbon fiber. Carbon, 42, pp. 2949-2962, DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.07.008
  16. Deng, L., Yuan, P., Liu, D., Annabi-Bergaya, F. & Zhou, J. (2017). Effects of microstructure of clay minerals, montmorillonite, kaolinite and halloysite, on their benzene adsorption behaviours. Applied Clay Science, 143, pp. 184-191, DOI:10.1016/j.clay.2017.03.035
  17. Duad, W.M.A.W. & Haushamnd, A.H. (2010) Textural characteristics, surface chemistry and oxidation of activated carbon. Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry, 19(3), pp. 267-79, DOI: 10.1016/S1003-9953(09)60066-9
  18. EN 13274-3:2008. Respiratory Protective Devices. Methods of Tests. Determination of Breathing Resistance; The European Committee for Standardization (CEN): Brussels, Belgium, 2008.
  19. EN 13274-7:2008. Respiratory Protective Devices. Methods of tests. Determination of Particle Filter Penetration. The European Committee for Standardization (CEN): Brussels, Belgium, 2008.
  20. EN 14387:2004+A1:2008. Respiratory Protective Devices. Gas Filters And Combined Filters. Requirements, Testing, Marking. The European Committee For Standardization (CEN): Brussels, Belgium, 2004.
  21. EN 149:2001+A1:2009. Respiratory Protective Devices—Particle filtering half Masks—Requirements, Testing, Marking. The European Committee for Standardization (CEN): Brussels, Belgium, 2001.
  22. Haobo, T., Yan, Z., Yue, L., Ying, W. & Xuemei, W. (2017). Emission characteristics and variation of volatile odorous compounds in the initial decomposition stage of municipal solid waste. Waste Manage, 68, pp. 677-687, DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.07.015
  23. Hassounah, I.A., Rowland, W.C., Sparks, S.A., Orler, E.B., Joseph, E.G., Camelio, J.A. & Mahajan, R.L. (2014). Processing of Multilayerd Filament Composites by Melt Blown Spinning. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 131, DOI: 10.1002/APP.40786
  24. Huang, Z.H., Kang, F., Zheng, Y.P., Yang, J.B. & Liang, K.M. (2002). Adsorption of trace polar methy-ethyl-ketone and non-polar benzene vapors on viscose rayon-based activated carbon fibers. Carbon, 40, pp. 1363-1367, DOI: 10.1016/S0008-6223(01)00292-5
  25. Ki-Joong, K. & Ho-Geun, A.H.N. (2012). The effect of pore structure of zeolite on the adsorption of VOCs and their desorption properties by microwave heating. Microporous and Mesoporous Material, 152, pp. 78-83, DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.11.051
  26. Krajewska, B. & Kośmider, J. (2005). Standards of Odour Quality Air. Air protection and Waste Issues, 6, pp. 81-191, (in Polish).
  27. Kraus, M., Trommler, U., Holzer, F., Kopinke, F.D. & Roland, U. (2018). Competing adsorption of toluene and water on various zeolites. Chemical Engineering Journal, 351, pp. 356-363, DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.06.128
  28. Kumar, V., Kumar, S., Kim, K.H., Tsang, D.C.W. & Lee, S.S. (2019). Metal organic frameworks as potent treatment media for odorants and volatiles in air. Environmental Research, 168, pp. 336-356, DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.10.002
  29. Makles, Z. & Galwas-Zakrzewska, M. (2005). Malignant gases in the work environment. Work Safety, 9, pp. 12-16, (in Polish).
  30. Michalak, A., Krzeszowiak, J. & Pawlas, K. (2014). Whether exposure to unpleasant odors (odors) harms health?. Environmental Medicine, 17, pp. 76-81, (in Polish).
  31. Namieśnik, J., Gębicki, J. & Wysocka, I. (2019). Technologies for deodorization of malodorous gases. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, pp. 9409–9434, DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-04195-1
  32. Okrasa, M., Hitz, J., Nowak, A., Brochocka, A., Thelen, C. & Walczak, Z. (2019). Adsorption Performance of Activated-Carbon-Loaded Nonwoven Filters Used in Filtering Facepiece Respirators. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16 (11), pp. 1973, DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16111973
  33. Oya A. & Iu WG. (2002). Deodorization performance of charcoal particles loaded with orthophosphoric acid against ammonia and trimethylamine. Carbon, 40(9), pp. 1391-1399, DOI: 10.1016/S0008-6223(01)00273-1
  34. Panek, R., Wdowin, M., Franus, W., Czarna, D., Stevens, L.A., Deng, H., Liu, J., Sun, C., Liu, H. & Snape, C.E. (2017). Fly ash-derived MCM-41 as a low-cost silica support for polyethyleneimine in post-combustion CO2 capture. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 22, pp. 81-90, DOI:10.1016/j.jcou.2017.09.015
  35. Pope III, CA. & Dockery, DW. (2016). Health Effects of Fine Particulate Air Pollution: Line that Connect. J Air Waste Manage, 56, pp. 709-742, DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2006.10464485
  36. Regulation (EU) 2016/425 of the European Parliament and the Council of 9 March 2016 on personal protective equipment and repealing Council Directive 89/686/EEC.
  37. Regulation of the Minister for Family, Labor and Social Policy on the Highest Permissible Concentrations and Intensities of Factors Harmful to Health in the Work Environment; Journal of Laws from 2018, item 1286; International Labour Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 12 June 2018.
  38. Rubahamya, B., Suresh Kumar Reddy, K., Prabhu, A., Al Shoaibi, A. & Srinivasakannan, C. (2019). Porous Carbon Screening for Benzene Sorption. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 38(1), pp. 93-99, DOI: 10.1002/ep.12925
  39. Rybarczyk, P., Szulczyński, B., Gębicki, J. & Hupka, J. (2019). Treatment of malodorous air in biotrickling filters: A review. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 141, pp. 146-162, DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2018.10.014
  40. Schlegelmilch, M., Streese, J. & Stegmann, R. (2005). Odour management and treatment technologies: An overview. Waste Management, 25 (9), pp. 928–939, DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.07.006
  41. Schmid, O., Möller, W., Semmler-Behnke, M.A., Ferron, G.A., Karg, E.W., Lipka, J., Schulz, H., Kreyling, W.G. & Stöeger, T. (2009). Dosimetry and toxicology of inhaled ultrafine particles. Biomarkers, 14, pp. 67-73, DOI: 10.1080/13547500902965617
  42. Stelmach, S., Wasilewski, R. & Figa, J. (2006). An attempt to produce granular adsorbents based on carbonates from used car tires. Archives of Waste Management and Environmental Protection, 4, pp. 107-114.
  43. Szynkowska, MI., Wojciechowska, E., Węglińska, A.& Paryjczak, T. (2009). Odorous emission. An environmental protection issue. Przemysł Chemiczny, 88(6) pp. 712-720. (in Polish)
  44. Tsai, J.H., Chiang, H.M., Huang, G.Y. & Chiang, H.L. (2008). Adsorption characteristics of acetone, chloroform and acetonitrile on sludge-derived adsorbent, commercial granular activated carbon and activated carbon fibers. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 154, pp. 1183-1191, DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.11.065
  45. Wang, G., Dou, B., Zhang, Z., Wang, J., Liu, H. & Hao, Z. (2015). Adsorption of benzene, cyclohexane and hexane on ordered mesoporous carbon, Journal of Environmental Science, 30, pp. 65-73, DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2014.10.015
  46. Xin, Z., Honglei, C., Fangong, K., Yujie, Z., Shoujuan, W., Shouxin, L., Lucian, A.L., Pedram, F. & Huan, P. (2019). Fabrication characteristics and applications of carbon materials with different morphologies and porous structures produced from wood liquefaction: A review. The Chemical Engineering Journal, 364, pp. 226-243, DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.01.159
  47. Xueyang, Z., Bin, G., Creamer, A.E., Chengcheng, C. & Yuncong, L. (2017). Adsorption of VOCs onto engineered carbon materials: A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 338, pp. 102-127, DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.05.013
  48. Yin, T., Meng, X., Jin, L., Yang, C., Liu, N. & Shi, L. (2020). Prepared hydrophobic Y zeolite for adsorbing toluene in humid environment. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 305, pp. 110327, DOI:10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110327
  49. Yue, Z. & Vakili, A. (2017). Activated carbon–carbon composites made of pitch-based carbon fibers and phenolic resin for use of adsorbents. Journal of Material Science, 52, pp. 12913-12921, DOI:10.1007/s10853-017-1389-7
  50. Zendelska, A., Golomeova, M., Golomeov, B. & Krstev B. (2018). Removal of lead ions from acid aqueous solutions and acid mine drainage using zeolite bearing tuff. Archives of Environmental Protection, 44(1), pp. 87–96, DOI:10.24425/118185
  51. Zhang, H., Liu, J., Zhang, X. & Jin, X. (2018). Design of electret polypropylene melt blown air filtration material containing nucleating agent for effective PM2.5 capture. RSC Advences, 8, pp. 7932-7941, DOI: 10.1039/c7ra10916d
  52. Zhang, X., Gao, B., Zheng, Y., Hu, X., Creamer, A.E., Annable, M.D. & Li, Y. (2017). Biochar for volatile organic compound (VOC) removal: Sorption performance and governing mechanisms. Bioresource Technology, 245, pp. 606-614, DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.025
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Agnieszka Brochocka
1
Aleksandra Nowak
1
Rafał Panek
2
Paweł Kozikowski
1
Wojciech Franus
2

  1. Central Institute for Labour Protection-National Research Institute, Lodz, Poland
  2. Lublin University of Technology, Lublin, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The problem of of the use of fly ash still constitutes a research and exploration area for scientists. This is due to the fact that, 6,000,000 Mg of coal combustion by-products (CCB) are storage on landfills yearly in Poland alone. One of the potential directions of using fly ash is to use it as a substrate in hydrothermal syntheses of mesoporous materials (synthetic zeolites). Zeolites are aluminosilicates with a spatial structure. Due to their specific structure they are characterized by a number of specific properties among others molecular-sieve, ion-exchange and catalytic that can be used in engineering and environmental protection. So far, the synthesis has been carried out using coal combustion by-products such as fly ash or microsphere. The article analyzes whether separation from the fly ash of the appropriate fraction (below 63 μm) will affect the formation of zeolite grains. The syntheses were carried out using class F fly ash and the fraction separated from it, which was obtained by sieving the ash through a 63 μm sieve. Chemical (XRF) and mineralogical (XRD, SEM-EDS) analyzes were carried out for substrates as well as the obtained reaction products. In the case of substrates, the analysis did not show any significant differences between the ash and the separated fraction. However, in products after synthesis (Na-X zeolite with a small amount of Na-P1 zeolite, and small amounts of quartz and unreacted aluminosilicate glass - mullite) higher aluminum and sodium contents were observed from the separated fraction, with a lower calcium and potassium content. A small proportion of illite was observed on the diffraction curve of the zeolite from the fraction. Observations of grain morphology showed no differences in formation. Based on the conducted analyzes, it can be stated that, considering the economics of the synthesis process, the separation of fine fractions from the fly ash does not affect the quality of the synthesis process.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Dorota Czarna-Juszkiewicz
Piotr Kunecki
Rafał Panek
Magdalena Wdowin
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The issue of mercury emission and the need to take action in this direction was noticed in 2013 via the Minamata Convention. Therefore, more and more often, work and new law regulations are commencing to reduce this chemical compound from the environment. The paper presents the problem of removing mercury from waste gases due to new BREF/BAT restrictions, in which the problem of the need to look for new, more efficient solutions to remove this pollution was also indicated. Attention is paid to the problem of the occurrence of mercury in the exhaust gases in the elemental form and the need to carry out laboratory tests. A prototype installation for the sorption of elemental mercury in a pure gas stream on solid sorbents is presented. The installation was built as part of the LIDER project, financed by the National Center for Research and Development in a project entitled: “The Application of Waste Materials From the Energy Sector to Capture Mercury Gaseous Forms from Flue Gas”. The installation is used for tests in laboratory conditions in which the carrier gas of elemental mercury is argon. The first tests on the zeolite sorbent were made on the described apparatus. The tested material was synthetic zeolite X obtained as a result of a two-stage reaction of synthesis of fly ash type C with sodium hydroxide. Due to an increase, the chemical affinity of the tested material in relation to mercury, the obtained zeolite material was activated with silver ions (Ag+) by an ion exchange using silver nitrate (AgNO3). The first test was specified for a period of time of about 240 minutes. During this time, the breakthrough of the tested zeolite material was not recorded, and therefore it can be concluded that the tested material may be promising in the development of new solutions for capturing mercury in the energy sector. The results presented in this paper may be of interest to the energy sector due to the solution of several environmental aspects. The first of them is mercury sorption tests for the development of new exhaust gases treatment technologies. On the other hand, the second aspect raises the possibility of presenting a new direction for the management and utilization of combustion by-products such as fly ash.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Piotr Kunecki
Dorota Czarna-Juszkiewicz
Rafał Panek
Magdalena Wdowin
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The reduction of mercury emissions in currently existing coal-based power plant solutions by each method i.e. preliminary, primary and secondary (consisting of introducing coal into the combustion chamber and then removing mercury from the combustion gases arising from the combustion process) does not solve the problem of achieving the required limits by power plants. Therefore, the need has arisen to look for new, effective solutions.

The results presented in the work concern the analysis of environmental benefits for the use of zeolites obtained from by-products of coal combustion such as fly ash (from hard coal and lignite) in technologies for removing gaseous forms of mercury. The tested zeolites were silver-modified X-type structures. The reference material in the considerations was active carbon impregnated with bromine – a commercially available sorbent on the market.

The article considers environmental benefits resulting from the use of tested zeolites taking the product life cycle, sorbent efficiency and the possibility of its regeneration compared to activated carbon (AC/Br) into account. The LCA analysis was performed taking the estimated material and energy balances of the manufacturing processes into account. When comparing the production process of type X zeolite materials on the processing line and activated carbons in the amount necessary to capture 375 g Hg from exhaust gases, the LCA analysis showed that zeolites contribute to a lower potential impact on the environment. The advantage is that 5 times less zeolite sorbent than activated carbons is needed to capture the same amount of mercury. In addition, zeolite materials can be regenerated, which extends their life time

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Łukasz Lelek
Magdalena Wdowin
ORCID: ORCID
Rafał Panek
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

CCS (Carbon Capture and Storage) technology is one of the methods that limit the release of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. However, the high cost of capturing CO2 in this technology is a major obstacle to the implementation of this solution by power plants. The reduction of costs is expected primarily on the side of the capture and separation of CO2 from flue/ industrial gas. The article presents the financial performance of the most popular amine technology (MEA) against mesoporous material about MCM-41 structure obtained from fly ash, impregnated with polyethyleneimine (PEI), for CCS installations. The study was conducted for an investment comprising three key components that provide a full value chain in CCS validation (capture, transport and storage). The mineralogical studies and determination of the physicochemical properties of mesoporous material produced from waste materials such as fly ash allowed us to identify the best class sorbents of MCM-41, which can be used in CO2 capture technologies. Developing an innovative relationship not only allows 100% of CO2 to be removed but also reduces operating costs (OPEX), primarily including energy by 40% and multiple material costs relative to amine mixtures such as MEA.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Renata Koneczna
Magdalena Wdowin
Rafał Panek
Łukasz Lelek
Robert Żmuda
Wojciech Franus
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

It is estimated that the amount of used car tires in the European Union in 2016 was established at the level of 3,515,000 Mg, which is undoubtedly a problem from the point of view of engineering and environmental protection. An alternative to storing this waste in landfills is their pyrolysis. As a result of thermal decomposition, calorific value products (oil and gas fraction) are obtained, as well as a solid residue, which due to its composition and properties can be processed into a high quality carbon sorbent. For this purpose, various methods of modification of the pyrolyzate are used, both involving physical and chemical activation. This article presents the characteristics of solid residue after the pyrolysis of rubber tires running at a temperature of about 400°C, which included an analysis of chemical composition (XRF and IR), mineralogical composition (XRD, SEM-EDS) and textural characteristics. Additionally, for the purpose of activation, the sample was treated with nitrogen at a temperature of 550°C. The mineralogical analysis showed that the dominant mineral component is carbon. In addition, the presence of quartz, calcite and sphalerite was observed. Analysis of the chemical composition suggests that due to the high carbon content (about 80% by mass) it is possible for a carbon sorbent from the analyzed waste to be obtained. However, previous preliminary studies did not allow a material constituting a substitute for activated carbon to be obtained, because the applied modification only slightly increased the BET specific surface area, which reached the value of approx. 85 m2/g. Based on the analysis of the pore size distribution of the 2 tested samples, it was found to be homogeneous/modal with a micro/mesoporous nature, while the shape of the hysteresis loop suggests the presence of “bottle shape” pores. Due to the relatively high content of zinc, the composition of waste (about 4% of mass), the possibility of recovery of this element should also be considered.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Dorota Czarna-Juszkiewicz
Magdalena Wdowin
Piotr Kunecki
Paweł Baran
Rafał Panek
Robert Żmuda
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

W artykule zbadano możliwość wykorzystania popiołów lotnych klasy C (otrzymywanych w wyniku spalania węgla brunatnego w kotle pyłowym) i F (otrzymywanych w wyniku spalania węgla kamiennego metodą konwencjonalną) jako substratów do syntezy materiału zeolitowego z grupy filipsytu. W tym celu przeprowadzono szereg syntez hydrotermalnych z wykorzystaniem reagentów takich jak wodorotlenek sodu (NaOH) oraz bromek tetrapropyloamoniowy (TPABr). W wyniku reakcji otrzymano docelowy materiał zeolitowy, zarówno z popiołu klasy C, jak i F. Otrzymane produkty syntezy, jak też popiołowe substraty reakcji, poddano charakterystyce chemicznej i mineralogicznej. Badania wykazały, że popiół lotny powstały z węgla brunatnego i kamiennego może być substratem w reakcjach syntez zeolitu, jakim jest filipsyt. Analiza porównawcza dyfraktogramów rentgenowskich produktów z obu typów popiołów wykazała, że lepszym substratem jest popiół klasy C otrzymywany w wyniku spalania węgla brunatnego w kotle pyłowym (w reakcji syntezy otrzymano lepiej wykształcone formy zeolitowe). W pracy dokonano także analizy literaturowej potencjalnych kierunków zastosowania filipsytu w inżynierii i ochronie środowiska. Na podstawie zweryfikowanych danych stwierdzono, iż dalszym kierunkiem badań będzie analiza możliwości wykorzystania otrzymanych materiałów jako potencjalnych sorbentów amoniaku.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Rafał Panek
Magdalena Wdowin
Piotr Kunecki
Justyna Cader
Dorota Czarna
Jarosław Madej
Patrycja Lipiec
Wojciech Franus

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more