Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 1
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article provides an optimized solution to the problem of passive shielding against static magnetic fields with any number of spherical shells. It is known, that the shielding factor of a layered structure increases in contrast to a single shell with the same overall thickness. For the reduction of weight and cost by given material parameters and available space the best system for the layer positions has to be found. Because classic magnetically shielded rooms are very heavy, this system will be used to develop a transportable Zero-Gauss-Chamber. To handle this problem, a new way was developed, in which for the first time the solution with regard to shielding and weight was optimized. Therefore, a solution for the most general case of spherical shells was chosen with an adapted boundary condition. This solution was expanded to an arbitrary number of layers and permeabilities. With this analytic solution a differential evolution algorithm is able to find the best partition of the shells. These optimized solutions are verified by numerical solutions made by the Finite Element Method (FEM). After that the solutions of different raw data are determined and investigated.
Go to article

Bibliography

[1] Schiebold K., Zerstörungsfreie Werkstoffprüfung – Magnetpulverprüfung, Springer-Verlag (2015).
[2] Farolfi A., Trypogeorgos D., Colzi G., Fava E., Lamporesi G., Ferrari G., Design and characterization of a compact magnetic shield for ultracold atomic gas experiments, Review of Scientific Instruments, 90.11, 115114 (2019), DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1907.06457.
[3] Report Buyer Ltd., Degaussing System Market by Solution, End User, Vessel Type and Region – Global Forecast to 2023, June (2018).
[4] Rücker A.W., VII. On the magnetic shielding of concentric spherical shells, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 37.224, pp. 95–130 (1894).
[5] Baum E., Bork J., Systematic design of magnetic shields, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic materials, 101.1-3, pp. 69–74 (1991).
[6] Clerk Maxwell J., Electricity and magnetism, vol. 2, New York: Dover (1954).
[7] David Jackson J., Classical Electrodynamics, American Association of Physics Teachers (1999).
[8] Karaboga D., Ökdem S., A simple and global optimization algorithm for engineering problems: differential evolution algorithm, Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, 12.1, pp. 53–60 (2004).
[9] Bronstein I.N., Hromkovic J., Luderer B., Schwarz H.R., Blath J., Schied A., Gottwald S., Taschenbuch der Mathematik, compact disc, Springer-Verlag (2008).
[10] Bartelmann M., Feuerbacher B., Krüger T., Lüst D., Rebhan A., Wipf A., Theoretische Physik 2 |Elektrodynamik, Springer-Verlag (2018).
[11] Rohner M., Magnetisch anhaftende Partikel zuverlässig entfernen, JOT Journal für Oberflächentechnik, 53, pp. 51–53 (2013).
[12] Maurer MagneticAG, Restmagnetismus – das verkannte Problem, JOT Journal für Oberflächentechnik, 57, pp. 104–105 (2017).
[13] Wilson E., Nicholson J.W., On the magnetic shielding of large spaces and its experimental measurement, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character, pp. 529–549 (1916).
[14] King L.V., XXI. Electromagnetic shielding at radio frequencies, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 15.97, pp. 201–223 (1933).
[15] Reutov Y.Y., Choice of the number of shells for a spherical magnetostatic shield, Russian Journal of Non-destructive Testing, 37.12, pp. 872–878 (2001).
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Patrick Alexander Ralf
1
ORCID: ORCID
Christian Kreischer
1

  1. Helmut Schmidt University, University of the Federal Armed Forced Hamburg, Germany

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more