Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 3
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

A companion robot is capable of performing a variety of activities and thus supporting the elderly and people withdisabilities. It should be able to overcome obstacles on its own, respond to what is happening around it in real-time, andcommunicate with its surroundings. It is particularly important to pay attention to these issues, as a companion robot is likely tobecome a participant in traffic. The aim of the research is to develop a mathematical model that takes into account the use of twonavigation solutions in the companion robot. Thanks to this, it will be possible to use the obtained mathematical relationships tocompare various types of navigation and make a rational choice, enabling the implementation of the assumed activities in aspecific external environment. What is new in this article is the analysis of several navigation methods and the presentation ofresearch carried out in real time using an actual robot.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Karolina Krzykowska-Piotrowska
Emilia Grabka
Ewa Dudek
Adam Rosiński
ORCID: ORCID
Kamil Maciuk
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper presents issues associated with the impact of electromagnetic interference on track-side cabinets of a closed-circuit television system (CCTV) functioning in a railway transport environment. The measurements of an electromagnetic field emitted by a track-side CCTV cabinet were presented. Designs of this kind are operated in railway facilities; therefore, they should not disturb the functioning of other equipment, the rail traffic control systems, in particular (so-called inner compatibility). An analysis of the obtained results enabled developing a research model, and a further reliability and operational analysis, taking into account electromagnetic interference. This enabled determining a relationship allowing the determination of the probability of a track-side CCTV cabinet staying in a state of full ability. The presented discussions regarding a track-side CCTV cabinet, taking into account electromagnetic interference, allow for the numerical assessment of different types of solutions (technical and organizational), which can be implemented in order to mitigate the impact of electromagnetic interference on a system’s functioning.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1.  R. Gordon, Intelligent Freeway Transportation Systems: Functional Design, Springer Science+Business Media, 2009.
  2.  P. Łubkowski and D. Laskowski, “Selected Issues of Reliable Identification of Object in Transport Systems Using Video Monitoring Services”, in Communication in Computer and Information Science, vol. 471, pp. 59‒68, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2015.
  3.  M. Siergiejczyk, A. Rosiński, and J. Paś, “Analysis of unintended electromagnetic fields generated by safety system control panels”, Diagnostyka 17(3), 35‒40 (2016).
  4.  M. Siergiejczyk, J. Paś, and A. Rosiński, “Train call recorder and electromagnetic interference”. Diagnostyka 16(1), 19‒22 (2015).
  5.  K. Sunitha and M. Joy Thomas, “Effect of Soil Conditions on the Electromagnetic Field From an Impulse Radiating Antenna and on the Induced Voltage in a Buried Cable”, IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 61(4), 990‒997 (2019), doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2018.2844205.
  6.  M. Kornaszewski, M. Chrzan, and Z. Olczykowski, “Implementation of New Solutions of Intelligent Transport Systems in Railway Transport in Poland”, in Communications in Computer and Information Science, pp. 282‒292, Springer, 2017.
  7.  J. Dyduch, J. Paś, and A. Rosiński, The basic of the exploitation of transport electronic systems, Publishing House of Radom University of Technology, Radom, 2011.
  8.  J. Paś, Operation of electronic transportation systems, Publishing House University of Technology and Humanities, Radom, 2015.
  9.  M. Chrzan, M. Kornaszewski, and T. Ciszewski, “Renovation of Marine Telematics Objects in the Process of Exploitation”, in Communications in Computer and Information Science, pp. 337‒351, Springer, 2018.
  10.  M. Siergiejczyk, J. Paś, and E. Dudek, “Reliability analysis of aerodrome’s electronic security systems taking into account electromagnetic interferences”, in Risk, Reliability and Safety: Innovating Theory and Practice: Proceedings of ESREL 2016, pp. 2285‒2292, eds. L. Walls, M. Revie, and T. Bedford, CRC Press/Balkema, 2017.
  11.  A. Rosiński, Modelling the maintenance process of transport telematics systems, Publishing House Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, 2015.
  12.  D. Romero-Faz and A. Camarero-Orive, “Risk assessment of critical infrastructures – New parameters for commercial ports”, Int. J. Crit. Infor. Prot. 18, 50‒57 (2017).
  13.  M. Jacyna, J. Żak, and P. Gołębiowski, “The EMITRANSYS model and the possibilities of its application for the analysis of the development of sustainable transport systems”, Combust. Eng. 179(4), 243‒248 (2019).
  14.  R. Billinton and R.N. Allan, Reliability evaluation of power systems, Plenum Press, New York, 1996.
  15.  R. Hari Kumar, N. Mayadevi, V.P. Mini, and S. Ushakumari, “Transforming distribution system into a sustainable isolated microgrid considering contingency”, Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci. 67(5), 871‒881 (2019).
  16.  R. Matyszkiel, R. Polak, P. Kaniewski, and D. Laskowski, “The results of transmission tests of polish broadband SDR radios”, in Communication and Information Technologies (KIT), pp. 1‒6, Slovakia, 2017.
  17.  A. Kierzkowski and T. Kisiel, “Simulation model of security control system functioning: A case study of the Wroclaw Airport terminal”, J. Air. Transp. Manag. 64(B), 173‒185 (2016).
  18.  D. Caban and T. Walkowiak, “Dependability analysis of hierarchically composed system-of-systems”, in Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Dependability and Complex Systems DepCoS-RELCOMEX, pp. 113‒120, eds. W. Zamojski, J. Mazurkiewicz, J. Sugier, T. Walkowiak, and J. Kacprzyk, Springer, 2019.
  19.  M. Borecki, M. Ciuba, Y. Kharchenko, and Y. Khanas, “Substation reliability evaluation in the context of the stability prediction of power grids”, Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci. 68(4), 769‒776 (2020).
  20.  M. Siergiejczyk, K. Krzykowska, and A. Rosiński, “Evaluation of the influence of atmospheric conditions on the quality of satellite signal”, in Marine Navigation, pp. 121‒128, ed. A. Weintrit, CRC Press/Balkema, London, 2017.
  21.  M. Stawowy and P. Dziula, “Comparison of uncertainty multilayer models of impact of teleinformation devices reliability on information quality”, in Proceedings of the European Safety and Reliability Conference ESREL 2015, pp. 2685‒2691, eds. L. Podofillini, B. Sudret, B. Stojadinovic, E. Zio, and W. Kröger, CRC, Press/Balkema, 2015.
  22.  M. Stawowy and Z. Kasprzyk, “Identifying and simulation of status of an ICT system using rough sets”, in Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Dependability and Complex Systems DepCoS-RELCOMEX, pp. 477‒484, eds. Z. Zamojski, J. Mazurkiewicz, J. Sugier, T. Walkowiak, and J. Kacprzyk, Springer, 2015.
  23.  T. Dabrowski, M. Bednarek, K. Fokow, and M. Wisnios, “The method of threshold-comparative diagnosing insensitive on disturbances of diagnostic signals”, Prz. Elektrotechniczny – Electrical Review 88(11A), 93‒97 (2012).
  24.  M. Łabowski and P. Kaniewski, “Motion Compensation for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle’s Synthetic Apperture Radar”, in Signal Processing Symposium SPSympo 2015, Debe, 2015, pp.184‒188.
  25.  P. Kaniewski, R. Gil, and S. Konatowski, “Estimation of UAV Position with Use of Smoothing Algorithms”, Metrol. Meas. Syst. 24(1), 127‒142 (2017).
  26.  K. Reddig, B. Dikunow, and K. Krzykowska, “Proposal of big data route selection methods for autonomous vehicles”, Internet Technol. Lett. 1(36), 1–6 (2018).
  27.  S. Duer, R. Duer, and S. Mazuru, “Determination of the expert knowledge base on the basis of a functional and diagnostic analysis of a technical object”, Romanian Association of Nonconventional Technologies XX(2), 23‒29 (2016).
  28.  S. Duer, K. Zajkowski, I. Płocha, and R. Duer, “Training of an artificial neural network in the diagnostic system of a technical object”, Neural Comput. Appl. 22(7), 1581‒1590 (2013).
  29.  F. Losurdo, I. Dileo, M. Siergiejczyk, K. Krzykowska, and M. Krzykowski, “Innovation in the ICT infrastructure as a key factor in enhancing road safety. A multi-sectoral approach”, in Proceedings 25th International Conference on Systems Engineering ICSEng 2017, pp. 157–162, eds. H. Selvaraj, G. Chmaj, and D. Zydek, 2017.
  30.  R. Burdzik, Ł. Konieczny, and T. Figlus, “Concept of on-board comfort vibration monitoring system for vehicles”, in Activities of Transport Telematics, pp. 418‒425, ed. J. Mikulski, Springer, Heidelberg, 2013.
  31.  M. Kostrzewski, “Analysis of selected acceleration signals measurements obtained during supervised service conditions – study of hitherto approach”, J. Vibroeng. 20(4), 1850‒1866 (2018).
  32.  M. Ali Niknejad, Electromagnetics for High-Speed Analog and Digital Communication Circuits, Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  33.  S. Piersanti, A. Orlandi, and F. de Paulis, “Electromagnetic Absorbing materials design by optimization using a machine learning approach”, IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 1‒8 (2018), doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2018.2871879.
  34.  J. Vašata and R. Doleček, “Electromagnetic compatibility and lightning current impacts in the railway equipment buildings”, in 26th Conference Radioelektronika 2016, Košice, Slovak Republic, 2016.
  35.  E. Lheurette, Metamaterials and Wave Control, ISTE and Wiley, 2013.
  36.  H. Urbancokova, J. Valouch, and M. Adamek, “Testing of an Intrusion and Hold-up Systems for Electromagnetic Susceptibility – EFT/B”, Int. J. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 9, 40‒46 (2015).
  37.  J. Valouch, “Technical requirements for Electromagnetic Compatibility of Alarm Systems”, Int. J. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 9, 186‒191 (2015).
  38.  S. Kovaf, J. Valouch, H. Urbančoková, and M. Adámek, “Electromagnetic interference of CCTV”, in International Conference on Information and Digital Technologies, Zilina, 2015, pp. 172‒177.
  39.  S. Kovář, J. Valouch, H. Urbančoková, and M. Adámek, “Impact of security cameras on electromagnetic environment in far and near- field”, in International Conference on Information and Digital Technologies (IDT) 2016, Rzeszow, 2016, pp. 156‒159.
  40.  H. Urbancokova and J. Valouch, “Monitoring of the tests EMS information technology equipment using the CCTV system”, Int. J. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 9, 9‒15 (2015).
  41.  H. Urbancokova, S. Kovar, O. Halaska, and J. Valouch, “Immunity of electronic devices against radio-frequency electromagnetic fields”, in 21st International Conference on Circuits, Systems, Communications and Computers (CSCC 2017), MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 125, 2017.
  42.  R.D. White, L.M. McCormack, and P.W. Hooper, “Electrical System Integration, Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Interface Management of Railway Electrification Systems”. HKIE Trans. 13 (1), 55‒59 (2006).
  43.  Z. Wróbel, “The Electromagnetic Compatibility in Researches of Railway Traffic Control Devices”, in Analysis and Simulation of Electrical and Computer Systems, pp. 275‒287, eds. D. Mazur, M. Gołębiowski, and M. Korkosz, Springer, 2018.
  44.  M. Urbaniak, E. Kardas-Cinal, and M. Jacyna, “Optimization of energetic train cooperation”, Symmetry 11(1175), (2019).
  45.  E. Masson, M. Berbineau, Broadband Wireless Communications for Railway Applications, Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, Springer International Publishing, 2017.
  46.  PN-EN 55016-4-2:2011 + A1:2014. Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods – Part 4‒2: Uncertainties, statistics and limit modelling – Measurement instrumentation uncertainty.
  47.  PN-EN 55016-2-3:2017. Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods – Part 2‒3: Methods of measurement of disturbances and immunity – Radiated disturbance measurements.
  48.  PN-EN 50121-3-2:2017. Railway applications – Electromagnetic compatibility – Part 3‒2: Rolling stock – Apparatus.
  49.  PN-EN 61000-6-4:2008 + A1:2012. Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) – Part 6‒4: Generic standards – Emission standard for industrial environments.
  50.  R. Smolenski, P. Lezynski, J. Bojarski, W. Drozdz, and L.C. Long, “Electromagnetic compatibility assessment in multiconverter power systems – Conducted interference issues”, Measurement 165, 1‒8 (2020).
  51.  V. Kuznetsov, B. Lyubarskyi, E. Kardas-Cinal, B. Yeritsyan, I. Riabov, and I. Rubanik, “Recommendations for the selection of parameters for shunting locomotives”, Arch. Transp. 56(4), 119–133 (2020).
  52.  C. Alcaraz and S. Zeadally, “Critical infrastructure protection: Requirements and challenges for the 21st century”, Int. J. Crit. Infrastruct. Prot. 8, 53‒66 (2015).
  53.  M. Stawowy and M. Siergiejczyk, “Application and simulations of uncertainty multilevel models to ensure the ITS services”, in Risk, Reliability and Safety: Innovating Theory and Practice: Proceedings of ESREL 2016, pp. 601‒605, eds. L. Walls, M. Revie, and T. Bedford, CRC Press/Balkema, 2017.
  54.  D. Szmel, W. Zabłocki, P. Ilczuk, and A. Kochan, “Selected issues of risk assessment in relation to railway signalling systems”, WUT J. Transp. Eng. 127, 81–91 (2019).
  55.  J. Paś and T. Klimczak, “Selected issues of the reliability and operational assessment of a fire alarm system”, Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc– Maintenance and Reliability 21(4), 553‒561 (2019).
  56.  M. Siergiejczyk, A. Rosiński, P. Dziula, and K. Krzykowska, “Reliability-exploitation analysis of highway transport telematics systems”, KONBiN 1(33), 177–186 (2015).
  57.  J. Paś, A. Rosiński, M. Chrzan, and K. Białek, “Reliability-Operational Analysis of the LED Lighting Module Including Electromagnetic Interference”, IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat. 62(6), 2747‒2758 (2020).
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jacek Paś
1
ORCID: ORCID
Adam Rosiński
2
ORCID: ORCID
Kamil Białek
3
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Military University of Technology, ul. gen. S. Kaliskiego 2, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland
  2. Warsaw University of Technology, ul. Koszykowa 75, 00-662 Warsaw, Poland
  3. Railway Institute, ul. Chłopickiego 50, 04-275 Warsaw, Poland

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more