Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 2
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article present the results of use of the proposed economic and mathematical apparatus to develop scenarios that provide for the partial or complete elimination of contradictions associated with the pricing policy between oil and gas production and the production of refined products. In the output we noted changes in the material consumption of products of the oil and gas sector of Ukraine. We corrected a certain contradiction between the extractive and processing enterprises of the oil and gas sector. This is related to the uneven distribution of value added between them, which allows extractive enterprises to make a profit, while processing enterprises are at a breakeven point. This situation, as we have seen, also distorts the results of the real assessment of resource efficiency in this sector of the economy. Thus, the research is aimed at developing scenarios that provide for a gradual decrease in the price of extractive products and its simultaneous growth in processing so that the corresponding impact on the economy was minimal. The first scenario envisaged a reduction in the price by –10% for the products of oil and gas companies with a simultaneous increase in the price of refining so that the average share of value added in the country as a whole was not decreased, taking appropriate adjustments of resource efficiency indicators into account. The second scenario was based on the need for deeper price adjustments in the oil and gas sector. Thus, the reduction of the price of products at the extractive enterprises at the level of –20% and its increase it in processing while maintaining the national average share of value added was envisioned. The third scenario provided for the equalization of material consumption in production and processing due to the price factor.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Nadiia Shmygol
ORCID: ORCID
Olena Cherniavska
Tеtіana Pulina
Ruslan Zavgorodniy
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In this article, in accordance with the results of calculations, the authors argue that at the end of 2019, the main problems of the vast majority of regions of Ukraine are low environmental and energy efficiency and insufficient environmental protection measures. The cluster analysis allowed us to identify common territorial groups in terms of their conditions of existence and to develop practical recommendations for priority measures of state management. The quality of clustering was checked using the silhouette measure indicator, which was used to justify the optimal number of regions, which proved to be five. Cluster І includes the Dnipropetrovsk and Zaporizhia regions. The gradual replacement of heavy industry with high-tech activities is inevitable. Cluster ІІІ includes the Volyn, Ternopil, Kherson, Khmelnytsky, Zhytomyr and Rivne regions. It is necessary to further develop the economy of the regions in compliance with environmental standards while taking into account the recommendations of the first cluster. Cluster IV consists of Donetsk and Luhansk regions. It is impossible to fully restore the economy of the eastern regions and its infrastructure in these conditions. Therefore, the task of public administration today is to ensure social standards of living and support the least protected segments of the population. Cluster V was built on the basis of Zakarpattia and Chernivtsi regions. The priority of state regulation should be the development of small and medium enterprises. Cluster II includes all other areas. Their economic growth must be transformed not only into the social sphere but also into technological re-equipment. The change of commodity orientation and the departure from raw material production in favor of technological is a necessary condition for maintaining the competitiveness of the economy in today’s globalization. Increasing the cost of environmental measures should be a priority.
Go to article

Bibliography

Belinska et al. 2021 – Belinska, Y., Matvejciuk, L., Shmygol, N., Pulina, T. and Antoniuk, D. 2021. EU agricultural policy and its role in smoothing the sustainable development of the EU’s agricultural areas. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 628(1), 012030, DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/628/1/012030.
Gakhovich, N.G. 2012. Ecologization of industrial production as a necessary condition for overcoming disproportion. [In:] World economic disproportion: features, tendencies, influence on the economy of Ukraine: scientific report, ed. Corresponding Member NAS of Ukraine L.V. Shinkaruk; NAS of Ukraine, In-t. Of Economics and predicted. NAS of Ukraine, pp. 94–98.
Geets, V.M. 2000. Instability and economic growth. V.M. Gay. K. In-t. Economics. forecast., 344 p. Gitis, L.H. 2003. Statistical classification and cluster analysis. L.H. Gitis. М., 157 p.
Kartikeyan et al. 2013 – Kartikeyan, T., Ragavan, R. and Vembandasamy, K. 2013. Hierarchical K-Means Clustering Algorithm for an E-Care of Diabetes Mellitus.
Kuchaki et al. 2012 – Kuchaki, R.M., Asghari, V.Z. and Emami, C.N. 2012. A Survey of Hierarchical clustering algorithms. The Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science 5(3), pp. 229–240.
Logutova, T.G. 2012. The problem of resource provision in the world economy. T.G. Logutova, О.V. Poltoratska, Theoretical and practical aspects of economics and intellectual property: a collection of scientific papers: in 2 issues; PDTU – Mariupol, Vip. 1., T. 1, pp. 205–211.
Maley, O.V. 2013. On the issue of development of the modern waste management system in Ukraine. О.В. Malei, A.O. Klyuchka, Ecological management in the general management system: collection of abstracts of the Thirteenth annual all-Ukrainian scientific conference, Sumy, April 17–18, 2013 / Resp. O.M. Telizhenko. Sumy: Sumy State University, pp. 91–94.
Ogol, D.O. 2015. Economic growth: essence, quality and sustainability. Actual problems of economy 2, pp. 67–72. [Online] http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ape_2015_2_11 [Accessed: 2021-09-02].
Perevozova et al. 2019 – Perevozova, I., Shmygol, N., Tereshchenko, D., Kandahura, K. and Katerna, O. 2019. Introduction of creative economy in international relations: Aspects of development security. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues 9(1), pp. 139–154, DOI: 10.9770/jssi.2019.9.1(11).
Pistunov, I.M. 2008. Cluster analysis in economics: textbook. way. I.M. Pistunov, O.P. Antonyuk, I.Y. Turchaninov. Dnepropetrovsk: Nat. min. University, 84 p. Popovych, Z. 2016. Economic growth and prospects for innovative development. Economy of Ukraine 12, pp. 41–48.
Sasirekha, K. and Baby, P. 2013. Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering Algorithm-A Review. Vol. 3. Sergienko-Berdyukova, L.V. 2015. Prerequisites for the formation and implementation of the concept of circular economy. Problems of theory and methodology of accounting, controlan analysis 3(33), pp. 327–350.
Simkiv, L.E. 2014. Qualitative economic growth in Ukraine, its assessment and ways of providing. Innovative economy 2, pp. 21–25. [Online] http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/inek_2014_2_4 [Accessed: 2021- 09-02].
Shmygol et al. 2018 – Shmygol, N., Galtsova, O. and Varlamova, I. 2018. Developing a methodology to assess the environmental and economic performance index based on international research to solve the economic and environmental problems of Ukraine. Baltic Journal of Economic 4, pp. 366–375, DOI: 10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-4-366-374.
Shmygol et al. 2020a – Shmygol, N., Cherniavska, O., Pulina, T. and Zavgorodniy, R. 2020a. Economic assessment of the implementation of the resource-efficient strategy in the oil and gas sector of the economy on the basis of distribution of trade margins between extracting and processing enterprises Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 23(3), pp. 135–146, DOI: 10.33223/epj/126998.
Shmygol et al. 2020b – Shmygol, N., Łuczka, W., Trokhymets, O., Pawliszczy, D. and Zavgorodniy, R. 2020b. Model of diagnostics of resource efficiency in oil and gas sector of economy of Ukraine. E3S Web of Conferences 166, DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202016613005.
Shmygol et al. 2021 – Shmygol, N., Solovyov, O., Kasianok, M., Cherniavska, O. and Pawliszczy, D. Model of sectoral competitiveness index by environmental component. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 628(1), DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/628/1/012023.
Skrypnyk, N.E. 2017. Factors and preconditions of economic growth in Ukraine. N.Y. Skripnik, A.V. Bulygina, Eastern Europe: Economics, Business and Management 6, pp. 11–15.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Nadiia Shmygol
1
ORCID: ORCID
Olga Galtsova
2
ORCID: ORCID
Kostiantyn Shaposhnykov
3
ORCID: ORCID
Saule Bazarbayeva
4
ORCID: ORCID

  1. «Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic» National University, Ukraine
  2. Classic Private University, Ukraine
  3. State Scientific Institution “Institute for Modernization of the Content of Education” of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Ukraine
  4. L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Kazakhstan

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more