Management and Production Engineering Review (MPER) is a peer-refereed, international, multidisciplinary journal covering a broad spectrum of topics in production engineering and management. Production engineering is a currently developing stream of science encompassing planning, design, implementation and management of production and logistic systems. Orientation towards human resources factor differentiates production engineering from other technical disciplines. The journal aims to advance the theoretical and applied knowledge of this rapidly evolving field, with a special focus on production management, organisation of production processes, management of production knowledge, computer integrated management of production flow, enterprise effectiveness, maintainability and sustainable manufacturing, productivity and organisation, forecasting, modelling and simulation, decision making systems, project management, innovation management and technology transfer, quality engineering and safety at work, supply chain optimization and logistics. Management and Production Engineering Review is published under the auspices of the Polish Academy of Sciences Committee on Production Engineering and Polish Association for Production Management. The main purpose of Management and Production Engineering Review is to publish the results of cutting-edge research advancing the concepts, theories and implementation of novel solutions in modern manufacturing. Papers presenting original research results related to production engineering and management education are also welcomed. We welcome original papers written in English. The Journal also publishes technical briefs, discussions of previously published papers, book reviews, and editorials. Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are highly encouraged.

This study builds on an existing structural model developed to examine the influence of

leadership and organizational culture on innovation and satisfaction of engineers in Australian

public sectors (APS). The objective of this study is to increase the understanding of

innovation process with a focus on causal relationships among critical factors. To achieve this

objective, the study develops an assessment approach to help predict creativity and work

meaningfulness of engineers in the APS. Three quantitative analysis methods were sequentially

conducted in this study including correlation analysis, path analysis, and Bayesian

networks. A correlation analysis was conducted to pinpoint the strong association between

key factors studied. Subsequently, path analysis was employed to identify critical pathways

which were accordingly used as a structure to develop Bayesian networks. The findings of

the study revealed practical strategies for promoting (1) transformational leadership and (2)

innovative culture in public sector organizations since these two factors were found to be key

drivers for individual creativity and work meaningfulness of their engineers. This integrated

approach may be used as a decision support tool for managing the innovation process for

engineers in the public sectors.