Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 9
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Cutaneous adverse food reaction (CAFR) is a common disease, affecting about 1-2% of dogs and cats. Diagnosis of the CAFR is made through elimination diet coupled with diet challenge, as methods like skin tests, patch tests, basophil degranulation tests and assessment of IgG and IgE serum levels are not sensitive enough. A partially hydrolysed salmon and pea hypoallergenic diet was evaluated in the diagnosis and treatment of CAFR in dogs and cats.
The diet was used in the treatment of 13 dogs and 12 cats for 10 weeks. The Pruritus Visual Analog Scale (PVAS; dogs and cats), Canine Atopic Dermatitis Extent and Severity Index (CADESI-04; dogs) and the Scoring Feline Allergic Dermatitis (SCORFAD; cats) were used for effectiveness evaluation.
In dogs, a significant decrease was reported in both CADESI-04 (from 17.3±7.5 to 10.15±7.4; p=0.028) and PVAS (from 7±1.3 to 4.76±1.8; p=0.003) after four weeks of treatment. Also in cats, both the PVAS (from 6.75±1.8 to 4±2.3; p=0.006) and SCORFAD (from 4.16±1.9 to 2.58±1.2; p=0.029) decreased significantly after four weeks. After eight weeks, a significant improvement was observed in almost all the animals. Evaluated diet was useful in the treatment of the CAFR in dogs and cats.
Go to article

Bibliography

Alexander DD, Schmitt DF, Tran NL, Barraj LM, Cushing CA (2010) Partially hydrolyzed 100% whey protein infant formula and atopic dermatitis risk reduction: a systematic review of the literature Nutr Rev, 68: 232-245.
Anderson JA (1986) The establishment of common language concerning adverse reactions to foods and food additives J Allergy Clin Immunol, 78: 140-144.
Belova S, Wilhelm S, Linek M, Beco L, Fontaine J, Bergvall K, Favrot C (2012) Factors affecting allergen-specific IgE serum levels in cats Can J Vet Res, 76: 45-51.
Bethlehem S, Bexley J, Mueller RS (2012) Patch testing and allergen-specific serum IgE and IgG antibodies in the diagnosis of canine adverse food reactions Vet Immunol Immunopathol, 145: 582-589.
Biourge VC, Fontaine J, Vroom MW (2004) Diagnosis of Adverse Reactions to Food in Dogs: Efficacy of a Soy-Isolate Hydrolyzate-Based Diet J Nutr, 134 (Suppl): 2062S-2064S.
Chesney CJ (2002) Food sensitivity in the dog: a quantitative study J Small Anim Pract, 43: 203-207.
DeBoer DJ, Hillier A (2001) The ACVD task force on canine atopic dermatitis (XV): Fundamental concepts in clinical diagnosis. Vet Immunol Immunopathol, 81: 271-276.
Denis S, Paradis M (1994) L’allergie alimentaire chez le chien et le chat. Le Médecin Vétérinaire Du Québec, 24: 15-20
Favrot C, Linek M, Fontaine J, Beco L, Rostaher A, Fischer N, Couturier N, Jacquenet S, Bihain BE (2017) Western blot analysis of sera from dogs with suspected food allergy Vet Dermatol, 28: 189-e42.
Favrot C, Steffan J, Seewald W, Hobi S, Linek M, Marignac G, Olivry T, Beco L, Nett C, Fontaine J, Roosje P, Bergvall K, Belova S, Koebrich S, Pin D, Kovalik M, Meury S, Wilhelm S (2012) Establishment of diagnostic criteria for feline nonflea-induced hypersensitivity dermatitis. Vet Dermatol 23(1): 45-50. Favrot C, Steffan J, Seewald W, Picco F (2010) A prospective study on the clinical features of chronic canine atopic dermatitis and its diagnosis. Vet Dermatol, 21: 23-31.
Foster AP, Knowles TG, Moore AH, Cousins PDG, Day MJ, Hall EJ (2003) Serum IgE and IgG responses to food antigens in normal and atopic dogs, and dogs with gastrointestinal disease. Veter Immunol Immunopathol, 92: 113-124.
Guilford WG (1996) Gastorintestinal immune system. In: Guilford WG, Center SA, Strombeck DR (eds) Strombeck’s small animal gastroenterology. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders Co. pp 20-37.
Guilford WG, Jones BR, Markwell PJ, Arthur DG, Collett MG, Harte JG (2001) Food Sensitivity in Cats with Chronic Idiopathic Gastrointestinal Problems. J Vet Intern Med 15(1): 7.
Hill PB, Lau P, Rybnicek J (2007) Development of an owner- -assessed scale to measure the severity of pruritus in dogs. Vet Dermatol 18: 301-308.
Jackson HA, Jackson MW, Coblentz L, Hammerberg B (2003) Evaluation of the clinical and allergen specific serum immunoglobulin E responses to oral challenge with cornstarch, corn, soy and a soy hydrolysate diet in dogs with spontaneous food allergy. Vet Dermatol 14: 181-187.
Jeffers JG, Shanley KJ, Meyer EK (1991) Diagnostic testing of dogs for food hypersensitivity. J Am Vet Med Assoc 198: 245-250.
Martin A, Sierra MP, Gonzalez JL, Arevalo MA (2004) Identification of allergens responsible for canine cutaneous adverse food reactions to lamb, beef and cow’s milk. Vet Dermatol 15: 349-356.
Mueller RS, Olivry T, Prélaud P (2016) Critically appraised topic on adverse food reactions of companion animals (2): common food allergen sources in dogs and cats. BMC Vet Res 12: 9.
Mueller RS, Tsohalis (1998) Evaluation of serum allergen- -specific IgE for the diagnosis of food adverse reactions in the dog. Vet Dermatol 9: 167-171.
Olivry T, Mueller RS (2016) Critically appraised topic on adverse food reactions of companion animals (3): prevalence of cutaneous adverse food reactions in dogs and cats. BMC Vet Res 13: 51.
Olivry T, Mueller RS (2020) Critically appraised topic on adverse food reactions of companion animals (9): time to flare of cutaneous signs after a dietary challenge in dogs and cats with food allergies. BMC Vet Res 16: 158.
Olivry T, Saridomichelakis M, Nuttall T, Bensignor E, Griffin CE, Hill PB (2014) Validation of the Canine Atopic Dermatitis Extent and Severity Index (CADESI)-4, a simplified severity scale for assessing skin lesions of atopic dermatitis in dogs. Vet Dermatol 25: 77-e25.
Ricci R, Hammerberg B, Paps J, Contiero B, Jackson H (2010) A comparison of the clinical manifestations of feeding whole and hydrolysed chicken to dogs with hypersensitivity to the native protein. Vet Dermatol 21: 358-366.
Rosser EJ (2013) Diagnostic Workup of Food Hypersensitivity. In: Noli C, Foster A, Rosenkrantz W (ed), Veterinary Allergy. Wiley Blackwell, Oxford pp. 119-123.
Rosser EJ (1993) Diagnosis of food allergy in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc, 203: 259-262.
Roudebush P, Guilford WG, Shanley KJ (2000) Adverse reactions to food. In: Hand MS, Novotny BJ (eds) Small animal clinical nutrition. Mark Morris Institute pp 431-453.
Rybníček J, Lau-Gillard PJ, Harvey R, Hill PB (2009) Further validation of a pruritus severity scale for use in dogs. Vet Dermatol 20: 115-122.
Scott DW, Miller WH, Griffin CE (2001) Muller & Kirk’s Small Animal Dermatology. In: Scott DW, Miller WH, Griffin CE (eds) Muller & Kirk’s Small animal dermatology. Saunders pp 543-666.
Steffan J, Olivry T, Forster SL, Seewald W (2012) Responsiveness and validity of the SCORFAD, an extent and severity scale for feline hypersensitivity dermatitis. Vet Dermatol 23: 410-e77.
Walton GS (1967) Skin responses in the dog and cat to ingested allergens. Observations on one hundred confirmed cases. Vet Rec 81: 709-713. White SD (1986) Food hypersensitivity in 30 dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 188: 695-698.
White SD, Sequoia D (1989) Food hypersensitivity in cats: 14 cases (1982-1987). J Am Vet Med Assoc, 194: 692-695. Wills J, Harvey R (1994) Diagnosis and management of food allergy and intolerance in dogs and cats. Austr Vet J 71: 322-326.
Zimmer A, Bexley J, Halliwell RE, Mueller RS (2011) Food allergen-specific serum IgG and IgE before and after elimination diets in allergic dogs. Vet ImmunolImmunopathol 144: 442-447.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

M.P. Szczepanik
1
M. Gołyński
2
P. Wilkołek
1
G. Kalisz
3

  1. Department of Clinical Diagnostics and Veterinary Dermatology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, ul. Gleboka 30, 20-612 Lublin, Poland
  2. Department of Diagnostics and Clinical Sciences, Veterinary Medicine Institute, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, ul. Gagarina 7, 87-100 Torun, Poland
  3. Independent Unit of Spectroscopy and Chemical Imaging, Faculty of Biomedicine, Medical University of Lublin, ul. W. Chodzki 4a, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Allergic skin diseases in cats are amongst the most prevalent dermatological conditions in this species. The objectives of this study were to evaluate different types of skin barrier measurements in healthy cats and cats with non-flea non-food hypersensitivity dermatitis (NFNFHD). 24 clinically healthy and 19 NFNFHD cats were included in this clinical trial. In each animal, the transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin hydration (SH) were assessed on six clipped body sites by VapoMeter SWL 4605 and Corneometer ®CM 825, respectively. Results of TEWL measurement were , significantly higher in one of the six examined body sites, namely on the lumbar area (p=0.0049). Furthermore, a statistically significant difference was found between the average TEWL values (p=0.019). Statistically notable differences were mea- sured at least in one certain body site for SH: in the groin (p=0.02), where the values in the affect- ed cats were lower than in the healthy individuals. These results may suggest that in NFNFHD cats transepidermal water loss is higher than in healthy cats. Skin hydration is, at least, in certain body sites, lower in atopic feline patients than in healthy individuals.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

M.P. Szczepanik
P.M. Wilkołek
Ł.R. Adamek
G. Kalisz
M. Gołyński
W. Sitkowski
I. Taszkun
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Videodermoscopic examinations have only recently started to be used in veterinary medicine and usually involve a small group of animals.
The aim of this study was to compare specific dermoscopic parameters in selected areas of the body of Arabian horses in the summer and winter seasons. The research was conducted between 2018-2019. The procedure was performed on the left side of the horse’s body in seven areas: head, neck, chest, flank, rump, mane, and tail. 42 purebred Arabian horses aged 1-25 (median), 39 mares and 3 stallions were qualified for the study. An Italian Video-Dermascope 7 (Medici Medical SRL with the 3 VIDIX 5Mpx camera and the VX1 overlay - Contact type cap Ø 3.5 cm) was used in the dermatoscopic evaluation. Specialist Cellsens Olympus software for analysing microscopic images was used to perform the measurements. Regardless of the area assessed, the skin in the summer months is darker than in the winter months. Hair thickness ranged from 44.82 (chest in summer) to 87.45 um (mane in winter). Regarding hair density, the number of hairs in the field of view of the dermatoscope ranged from 990 (summer mane) to 3680 (head in winter). Our research showed that the season of the year influences the amount of hair without significantly affecting its thickness.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

A. Pomorska-Zniszczyńska
1
M.P. Szczepanik
2
G. Kalisz
3
N. Adamczyk
4
M. Tarach
4
M. Sobuś
4
B. Abramowicz
5

  1. Subdepartment of Internal Diseases of Farm Animals and Horses, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Głęboka 30, 20-612 Lublin, Poland
  2. Subdepartment of Clinical Diagnostics and Veterinary Dermatology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Głęboka 30, 20-612 Lublin, Poland
  3. Department of Biopharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
  4. Students, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland
  5. Sub-Department of Internal Diseases of Accompanying Animals, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Głęboka 30, 20-612 Lublin, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most frequent allergic disease in dogs. AD can be treated using allergenspecific immunotherapy as well as symptomatic antipruritic treatment including the use of lokivetmab - caninized anti-interleukine-31 antibody.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of lokivetmab over 12 weeks of treatment. Studies have been carried out in 89 dogs. In all affected animals, the severity of lesions was assessed using the CADESI 04 and the pruritus was assessed using the VAS.

After the first dose of lokivetmab, both CADESI 04 and VAS statistical decreased by 4 weeks from 40.48 to 20.31, and from 7.42 to 2.48, respectively (p = 0.0000001) maintained significantly decresed values during the whole treatment period (CADESI 04 15.64, 15.07 after 8 and 12 weeks, respectively, PVAS 2.03, 1.95 after 8 and 12 weeks, respectively).

Lokivetmab leads to a significant reduction of CADESI 04 and pruritus, within four weeks and maximum effect is achived after the second dose.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

M.P. Szczepanik
J. Popiel
A. Cekiera
D. Pomorska-Handwerker
J. Karaś-Tęcza
M. Ściskalska
K. Oczkowska
M. Taube
V. Olender
P. Parys

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more