Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 19
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The cement production process is associated with the emission of dust. These are mainly CKD (cement kiln dust) and BPD (by-pass dust), classified as wastes from group 10 – Wastes from thermal processes, subgroups 10 and 13 – wastes from manufacture of cement, lime and plaster and articles and products made from them. Cement kiln dust is a waste of variable composition and properties, which makes it a difficult material to recover. The main directions of recovery presented in the world literature indicate the use of dust from cement kilns in cement, mortar and concrete production, the production of bricks and in order to improve soil quality and wastewater treatment. Factors affecting chemical and phase compositions of dust from cement kilns are the reason why each waste should be analyzed individually. The paper presents the results of the analysis of the cement kiln dust after dedusting cement kilns and two bypass dusts. Analysis of the chemical composition has shown significant concentrations of chlorine, potassium and calcium in all wastes. The content of: Si, S, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu, Zn, Zr, Pb, and Bi has also been confirmed. The analyzed dusts were characterized by the presence of carbonates (calcite, dolomite, and arcanite), quartz, alite, belite, sylvine, anhydrite, and portlandite in their phase composition. The leachates which were characterized by an alkaline reaction. In terms of leachability, high concentrations of chlorine ions in the analyzed dust leachates were confirmed, which significantly limits their use.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Alicja Uliasz-Bocheńczyk
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Fly ashes from the combustion of lignite coal are suitable materials for the creation of suspensions in which CO2 is bound by mineral carbonation. Considering their limited economic uses, mineral sequestration, as a stage of the CCS technology in lignite coal power plants, can be a way of recycling them. Mineral sequestration of CO2 was researched using fly ashes from the combustion of lignite coal in the Pątnów power plant, distinguished by a high content of CaO and free CaO. Research into phase composition confirmed the process of carbonation of the whole calcium hydroxide contained in pure suspensions. The degree of CO2 binding was determined on the basis of thermogravimetric analysis. A rise in the content of CaCO3 was found in the suspensions after subjecting them to the effects of carbon dioxide. Following carbonation the pH is lowered. A reduction in the leaching of all pollutants was discovered in the studied ashes. The results obtained were compared to earlier research of ashes from the same power plant but with a different chemical composition. Research confirmed that water suspensions of ashes from the combustion of lignite coal in the Pątnów power plant are distinguished for a high degree of carbonation.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Alicja Uliasz-Bocheńczyk
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Postęp cywilizacji jest nieodmiennie związany z coraz szybszym wytwarzaniem odpadów. Kwestia odpadów stała się już globalnym problemem. Na całym świecie opracowuje się nowe technologie utylizacji odpadów i metody zastosowania ich w przemyśle. Jedną z takich możliwości jest wykorzystanie palnych frakcji odpadów w charakterze źródła energii.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Eugeniusz Mokrzycki
Alicja Uliasz-Bocheńczyk
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Power production is the largest source of emissions of anthropogenic carbon dioxide. The main fuels in Poland are solid fuels - hard coal and lignite. Their combustion produces large quantities of waste, primarily fly ash. The ashes from lignite, due to the chemical and phase composition, and thus their properties, have - so far - limited economic use. Among their possible applications is the use of mineral sequestration of carbon dioxide - this is the result of their relatively high content of active CaO and MgO, which can react with carbon dioxide in aqueous suspensions. The paper presents maximum theoretical capacity of CO2 bonding for examined fly ashes and the results of the research on absorption of CO2 by the ash-water suspensions from fly ash resulting from the combustion of lignite from Pątnów and Turów power plants. Calculated for the examined fly ashes maximum theoretical capacity of CO2 bonding amounted to 14% for the ashes from Pątnów power plant and 14.4% for the fly ashes from Turów power plant. Studies have shown that most CO2 - 8.15 g/100 g of ash, was absorbed by suspension with ashes from Turów power plant with a mass ratio of ash to water of at 0.8:1. In the case of ash from Pątnów power plant absorption was lower and amounted to a maximum - 8.7 g CO2/100 g ash. The largest increase CO2 absorption was observed in the first 30 minutes of carbonation in the suspensions of fly ash from Pątnów power plant and the first 15 minutes in suspensions of fly ash from Turów power plant. After this time, the absorption has increased slowly. An increase in temperature in the chamber system, confirming the occurrence of the process of carbonation and its endothermic character. The highest temperature - 44.8 C recorded in the suspension with ashes from Turów power plant, which has also the greatest absorption of CO2. The results confirm the usefulness of these ashes to sequester carbon dioxide.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Alicja Uliasz-Bocheńczyk
Marek Gawlicki
Radosław Pomykała
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The cement industry has been using waste as a raw material for many years. Waste is also used as alternative fuel. Cement plants are an important element of the waste management system and fit the idea of a circular economy. When waste is recovered in the cement production process, direct and indirect CO 2 emissions are partially avoided. This article discusses the cement industry in Poland. The current situation in terms of the use of alternative fuels and raw materials in Poland, the different types of waste and the amount of waste used is discussed. The article discusses changes in the amount of waste (the increase in the amount of waste used as raw materials from the year 2006 to the year 2019) and the types of waste recovered in the cement production process and the possibility of closing material cycles on the plant scale (recycling to the primary process – cement kiln dust) and industry (using waste from other industries: metallurgy – granulated blast furnace slag, iron bearings; energy production – fly ash, reagypsum/phosphogypsum, fluidized bed combustion fly ash, and fluidized bed combustion bottom ash; wastewater treatment plants – sewage sludge, etc.). The analysis shows that the role of cement plants in waste management and the circular economy in Poland is important. Industrial waste from metallurgy, power plants, heat and power plants, wastewater treatment plants, and municipal waste is used as the raw material for the cement industry, leading to an industrial symbiosis.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Alicja Uliasz-Bocheńczyk
1
ORCID: ORCID
Eugeniusz Mokrzycki
2
ORCID: ORCID

  1. AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Resource Management, Kraków, Poland
  2. Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Requirements for environmental protection, such as reducing emissions of CO2, NOx, and SO2 are the reason for growing interest in new technologies for coal utilization. One of the most promoted technologies is coal gasification. However, like any technology using coal, this process produces wastes – fly ash and slag. Due to the small number of coal gasification plants, these wastes are poorly understood. Therefore, before making decisions on the introduction of coal gasification technology, a waste utilization plan should be developed. This also applies to the slags formed in underground coal gasification technology. One of the options under consideration is to use these wastes as a component in mineral binders of a pozzolanic character. This paper compares the properties of two types of slags. The first slag (MI) comes from fuel gasification, and the second slag (BA) is from underground coal gasification. Slag MI can be classified as basic slag with a chemical composition similar to that of silica fly ash from coal combustion. Slag BA – because of its four times greater content of calcium oxide – belongs to a group of weakly basic slags. The main and only mineral component of slag MI is glassy phase. Slag BA forms – besides the glassy phase – crystalline phases such as mullite (3 Al2O3 · 2 SiO2), quartz (-SiO2), anorthite (Ca(Al2Si2O8)), gehlenit (Ca2Al[(Si,Al)2O7]), wollastonite (Ca3[Si3O9]), 2CaO · SiO2, and 4 CaO · Al2O3 · Fe2O3. The results of analyses have shown that slag BA has better pozzolanic properties (the pozzolanic activity index is 75.1% at 90 days) than slag MI (69.9% at 90 days) The preliminary studies lead to the conclusion that these slags are characterized by very low pozzolanic activity and cannot be used as a pozzolanic material.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Maciej Mazurkiewicz
Ewelina Tkaczewska
Radosław Pomykała
Alicja Uliasz-Bocheńczyk
ORCID: ORCID
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The use of biomass in the energy industry is the consequence of ongoing efforts to replace Energy from fossil fuels with energy from renewable sources. However, due to the diversity of the biomass, its use as a solid fuel generates waste with diverse and unstable chemical composition. Waste from biomass combustion is a raw material with a very diverse composition, even in the case of using only one type of biomass. The content of individual elements in fly ash from the combustion of biomass ranges from zero to tens of percent. This makes it difficult to determine the optimal recovery methods. The ashes from the combustion of biomass are most commonly used in the production of building materials and agriculture. This article presents the elemental composition of the most commonly used biomass fuels. The results of the analysis of elemental composition of fly ashes from the combustion of forest and agricultural biomass in fluidized bed boilers used in the commercial power industry were presented. These ashes are characterized by a high content of calcium (12.3–19.4%), silicon (1.2–8.3%), potassium (0.05–1.46%), chlorine (1.1–6.1%), and iron (0.8–6.5%). The discussed ashes contained no sodium. Aluminum was found only in one of the five ashes. Manganese, chromium, copper, nickel, lead, zinc, sulfur, bismuth, titanium and zirconium were found in all of the examined ashes. The analysis of elemental composition may allow for a preliminary assessment of the recovery potential of a given ash.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Alicja Uliasz-Bocheńczyk
ORCID: ORCID
Eugeniusz Mokrzycki
ORCID: ORCID
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The progress of civilization is inevitably connected with the ever increasing production of waste. Waste has become humanity's global problem. All over the world, new_ technologies are being developed that strive to decrease the amount of waste and seek ways of utilizing waste in industry. One of the opportunities for this involves the use of the combustible fractions of waste as an energy source.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Eugeniusz Mokrzycki
ORCID: ORCID
Alicja Uliasz-Bocheńczyk
ORCID: ORCID
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The alternative waste fuels have a significant share in the fuel mix of the cement industry in Poland. The conditions inside cement kilns are favorable enough for environmentally-friendly use of waste fuels. In the article, the authors discuss the current situation concerning the use of alternative fuels in Poland, from difficult beginning in the 1990s to the present time, different kinds of fuels, and the amounts of used fuels. The use of fuels in Poland is presented against the global and EU consumption (including Central European countries and companies). The increased use of waste-derived fuels, from the level of about 1% at the end of the 1990s to the present level of about 70%, allowed for the limitation of waste storage, including avoidance of greenhouse gas emissions and consumption of conventional energy sources; those effects also contributed to the implementation of the sustainable development and circular economy conceptions. The experiences of the cement plants worldwide prove that the use of waste fuels is ecological and economical. The examples showed in the article confirm that cement plants are greatly interested in using waste fuels from waste, as they invest in the infrastructure allowing to store bigger amounts of waste and dose them more efficiently. Thus, the cement industry has become an important element of the country’s energy economy and waste management system.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Aranda Usón, A., López-Sabirón, A.M., Ferreira, G. & Llera Sastresa, E. (2013). Uses of alternative fuels and raw materials in the cement industry as sustainable waste management options, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 23, pp. 242–260.
  2. Bąblewski, P. (2012). Co-combustion of alternative fuels in the cement plants Cemex-Poland, in: Proceedings of Conference – Waste to Energy – Warszawa, 14th June 2012. (in Polish)
  3. Beer, J. de, Cihlar, J. & Hensing, I. (2017a). Status and prospects of co-processing of waste in EU cement plants. (https://cembureau.eu/media/ldfdotk0/12950-ecofys-co-processing-waste-cement-kilns-case-studies-2017-05.pdf (16.07.2021)).
  4. Beer, J. de, Cihlar, J., Hensing, I. & Zabeti, M. (2017b). Status and prospects of co- processing of waste in EU cement plants. (https://cembureau.eu/media/2lte1jte/11603-ecofys-executive-summary_cembureau-2017-04-26.pdf (16.07.2021)).
  5. Bieniek, J., Domaradzka, M., Przybysz, K. & Woźniakowski, W. (2011). Use of alternative fuels based on selected fraction of communal and industrial waste in Gorazdze Cement, Acta Agrophysica, 17, pp. 277−288. (in Polish)
  6. Buzzi Unicem (2014–2020). Sustainability Report 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020. (https://www.dyckerhoff.pl/raporty-zr (16.07.2021)).
  7. Cao, Y. & Pawłowski, L. (2012). Lublin experience with co-incineration of muncipal solid wastes in cement industry, Annual Set the Environment Protection, 14, pp. 132−145.
  8. CEMBUREAU (2020). Cementing the European Green Deal. Reaching climate neutrality along the cement and concrete value chain by 2050. (https://cembureau.eu/media/w0lbouva/cembureau-2050-roadmap_executive-summary_final-version_web.pdf (16.07.2021)).
  9. Cement Ożarów (2019). http://ozarow.com.pl/o-nas/zrownowazony-rozwoj/ (16.08.2021)). (in Polish)
  10. Cemex (2016). Alternative fuels at CEMEX Polska. (https://www.cemex.pl/documents/46481509/46532590/CX_Paliwa_Alternatywne.pdf/97cc39f5-fa6f-fe04-8a58-6d0f23d1f928 (16.07.2021)). (in Polish))
  11. Cemex (2002–2020). Annual Report. Global Reports, Cemex, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020. (https://www.cemex.com/sustainability/reports/global-reports (16.07.2021)).
  12. Cemex Polska (2017–2019). Chełm Cement Plant. Environmental Statement 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019. (https://www.cemex.pl/zarzadzanie-wplywem-na-srodowisko.aspx (16.07.2021)). (in Polish)
  13. Cemex Polska (2010–2016) Sustainability Report 2010, 2011–2012, 2013–2014, 2015–2016. (https://www.cemex.pl/nasze-raporty (16.07.2021)). (in Polish)
  14. Change of municipal waste management system in Poland in 2012–2016, 2017. (https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/srodowisko-energia/srodowisko/zmiana-systemu-gospodarki-odpadami-komunalnymi-w-polsce-w-latach-2012-2016,6,1.html (16.07.2021)). (in Polish)
  15. CRH (2018). Creating a Sustainable Built Environment. CRH Sustainbility Report 2017. (https://www.crh.com/media/1022/crh-sustainability-report-2018.pdf (16.07.2021)).
  16. Czech Cement Association (2017–2019). Data 2017, 2018, 2019. Svaz výrobců cementu České republiky Czech Cement Association. (https://www.svcement.cz/data/data-2020/ (16.07.2021)).
  17. Ecofys (2016). Market opportunities for use of alternative fuels in cement plants across the EU Assessment of drivers and barriers for increased fossil fuel substitution in three EU member states: Greece, Poland and Germany. (https://coprocessamento.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Ecofys_Report_Market_Opportunities_Coprocessing_20160501.pdf (16.07.2021)).
  18. Fyffe, J.R., Breckel, A.C., Townsend, A.K. & Webber, M.E. (2016). Use of MRF residue as alternative fuel in cement production, Waste Management, 47, pp. 276–284.
  19. Genon, G. & Brizio, E. (2008). Perspectives and limits for cement kilns as a destination for RDF, Waste Management, 28, pp. 2375–2385.
  20. Górażdże Group, 2016. Sustainable Report 2014–2015. Górażdże Group. (https://www.gorazdze.pl/pl/raport-zrownowazonego-rozwoju-2014-2015 (16.07.2021)). (in Polish)
  21. Hasanbeigi, A., Lu., L., Williams, Ch. & Price. L., (2012). International best practices for pre-processing and co-processing municipal solid waste and sewage sludge in the cement industry. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (LBL) for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1213537 (16.08.2021)).
  22. HeidelbergCement (20042020) Sustainability Report 2004/2005, 2006, 2009/2010, 2011/2012, 2013/2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020. https://www.heidelbergcement.com/en/sustainability-reports (16.07.2021)).
  23. Holt, S.P. & Berge, N.D. (2018). Life-cycle assessment of using liquid hazardous waste as an alternative energy source during Portland cement manufacturing: A United States case study, Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, pp. 1057–1068.
  24. Husillos Rodríguez, N., Martínez-Ramírez, S., Blanco-Varela, M.T., Donatello, S., Guillem, M., Puig, J., Fos, C., Larrotcha, E. & Flores, J. (2013). The effect of using thermally dried sewage sludge as an alternative fuel on Portland cement clinker production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, pp. 94–102.
  25. Kookos, I.K., Pontikes, Y., Angelopoulos, G.N. & Lyberatos, G. (2011). Classical and alternative fuel mix optimization in cement production using mathematical programming. Fuel, 90, pp. 1277–1284.
  26. LafargeHolcim (2019). Sustainability Report Lafarge in Poland 2017-2018. (https://www.lafarge.pl/sites/poland/files/atoms/files/lafarge-zrownowazony-rozwoj-raport-broszury-2017-2018.pdf (16.07.2021)).
  27. LafargeHolcim (2017–2020). Sustainability Report 2017, 2018, 2020.(https://www.holcim.com/sustainability-reports (16.07.2021)).
  28. Lechtenberg, D. (2008). Alternative fuels – history and outlook, Global Fuels Magazine, pp. 28–30.
  29. Liu, X., Yuan, Z., Xu, Y. & Jiang, S. (2017). Greening cement in China: A cost-effective roadmap, Applied Energy, 189, pp. 233–244.
  30. Mauschitz, G. (2009 - 2019). Emissionen aus Anlagen der österreichischen Zementindustrie Berichtsjahr 2009, 2011, 2014, 2017, 2018, 2019. (https://www.zement.at/service/publik.ationen/emissionsberichte (16.07.2021)). (in German)
  31. Mokrzycki, E. & Uliasz-Bocheńczyk, A. (2009). Management of primary energy carriers in Poland versus environmental protection, Annual Set the Environment Protection, 11, pp. 103–131. (in Polish)
  32. Mokrzycki, E., Uliasz-Bocheńczyk, A. & Sarna, M. (2003). Use of alternative fuels in the Polish cement industry, Applied Energy, 74, pp. 101–111.
  33. "ODRA" S.A. Cement Mill 2018. Environmental Statement "ODRA" S.A. Cement Mill 2018. (https://emas.gdos.gov.pl/files/artykuly/24009/Cementownia-Odra-DEKLARACJA-SRODOWISKOWA-ZA-ROK-2018_icon.pdf (16.08.2021)). (in Polish)
  34. "ODRA" S.A. Cement Mill 2018. Environmental Statement "ODRA" S.A. Cement Mill 2019. (http://emas.gdos.gov.pl/files/artykuly/24009/50.-DEKLARACJA-SRODOWISKOWA-ZA-ROK-2019_icon.pdf (16.08.2021)). (in Polish)
  35. Olkuski, T. (2013). Analysis of domestic reserves of steam coal in the light of its use in power industry. Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi-Mineral Resources Management, 29, pp. 25-38. (in Polish)
  36. Rahman, A., Rasul, M.G., Khan, M.M.K. & Sharma, S. (2015). Recent development on the uses of alternative fuels in cement manufacturing process, Fuel, 145, pp. 84–99.
  37. Regulation of the Minister of Economy of 16 July 2015 on the acceptance of waste to landfills. Journal of Laws, 2015, item 1277).
  38. Schakel, W., Hung, C.R., Tokheim, L.A., Strømman, A.H., Worrell, E. & Ramírez, A. (2018). Impact of fuel selection on the environmental performance of post-combustion calcium looping applied to a cement plant, Applied Energy, 210, pp. 75–87.
  39. Schorcht, F., Kourti, I., Scalet, B.M , Roudier, S., Sancho, L.D. (2013) Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in the Cement, Lime and Magnesium Oxide. Manufacturing Industries (May 2010). European Commission. European Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Bureau. http://eippcb.jrc.es/reference/cl.html (16.08.2021)).
  40. The Plan…(2016)a. Waste Management Plan for Lublin Voivodeship 2022. (https://www.lubelskie.pl/file/2018/11/WPGO-2022.pdf (16.07.2021)). (in Polish)
  41. The Plan…(2016)b. Waste Management Plan for the Opole Voivodeship 2016-2022 taking into account the years 2023-2028 – project. (http://m.opolskie.pl/docs/plik_22.pdf (16.07.2021)). (in Polish)
  42. The Plan…(2016)c. Waste Management Plan for the Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship 2016-2022 - project. (http://bip.sejmik.kielce.pl/237-departament-rozwoju-obszarow-wiejskich-i-srodowiska/4460-plan-gospodarki-odpadami-dla-wojewodztwa-swietokrzyskiego-2016-2022/23107.html (16.07.2021)). (in Polish)
  43. The Polish Cement Association (2006–2021). Bulletin of The Polish Cement Association 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021. (in Polish)
  44. Uliasz-Bocheńczyk, A.& Mokrzycki, E. (2015). Biomass as a fuel in power industry. Annual Set the Environment Protection, 17, pp. 900–913. (in Polish)
  45. Verein Deutscher Zementwerke (2014–2019). Environmental Data of the German Cement Industry, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019. (https://www.vdz-online.de/en/ (16.07.2021)).
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Alicja Uliasz-Bocheńczyk
1
ORCID: ORCID
Jan Deja
2
ORCID: ORCID
Eugeniusz Mokrzycki
3
ORCID: ORCID

  1. AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Resource Management, Poland
  2. AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Materials Science, and Ceramics, Poland
  3. Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more