Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 2
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Filtering Respiratory Protective Devices (FRPD) is not typically evaluated for exposure to volatile compounds, even though they significantly affect their protective performance. Such compounds are released into the atmosphere by industrial processes and pose serious health risks in people inhaling them. The adsorbent materials currently used to prevent those risks include activated carbon (AC). Zeolites and mesoporous silica materials (MCM) are very popular among the sorption materials. Due to their physical and chemical properties, they are able to adsorb significant amounts of volatile compounds from air. The melt-blown technology was used to produce filtering nonwovens with modifiers. As a result, polymer nonwoven structures with modifiers in the form of AC, zeolite (NaP1 type), molecular sieves (SM, SM 4Å) and mesoporous silica materials (MCM-41) were produced. The use of ACs (AC1 from Zgoda and AC2 from Pleisch) and their mixtures with others modifiers allowed to obtain satisfactory sorption, protective and utility properties. The longest breakthrough time against cyclohexane (approx. 53 min) was afforded by a variant containing AC, against ammonia (approx. 12 min) for the variant with AC2 and a mixture of AC2 and MCM-41. In the case of acetone vapor satisfactory breakthrough times were found for the variants with AC2 and AC1+SM (~20–25 min.). The present work deals with scientific research to improve workers’ and society’s health and safety by pursuing a better working life, and creating a safe social environment.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Anand, S.S., Philip, B.K. & Mehendale, H.M. (2014). Volatile Organic Compounds, [In] Wexler, P. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Toxicology (Third Edition), Academic Press, pp. 967-970, ISBN: 9780123864550, DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-386454-3.00358-4
  2. Amid, H., Maze, B., Flickinger, M.C. & Pourdeyhimi, B. (2016). Hybrid adsorbent nonwoven structures: a review of current technologies. Journal of Material Science, 51, pp. 4173-4200, DOI: 10.1007/s10853-016-9741-x
  3. Balanay, J.A.G., Bartolucci, A.A. & Lungu, C.T. (2014). Adsorption Characteristics of Activated Carbon Fibers (ACFs) for Toluene: Application in Respiratory Protection. Journal of Occupacional Environmental and Hygiene, 11, pp. 133-143, DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2013.816433
  4. Balanay, J.A.G. & Lungu, C.T. (2016). Determination of pressure drop across activated carbon fiber respirator cartridges. Journal of Occupational Environmental and Hygiene, 13, pp. 141-147, DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2015.1091960
  5. Baysal, G. (2019). Cleaning of pesticides from aqueous solution by a newly synthesized organoclay. Archives of Environmental Protection, 45(3), pp. 21–30, DOI: 10.24425/aep.2019.128637
  6. Brochocka, A., Nowak A., Panek, R. & Franus, W. (2019). The Effects of Textural Parameters of Zeolite and Silica Materials on the Protective and Functional Properties of Polymeric Nonwoven Composites. Applied Science, 9. pp. 515, DOI: 10.3390/app9030515
  7. Brochocka, A., Zagawa, A., Panek, R., Madej, J. & Franus, W. (2018). Method for introducing zeolites and MCM-41 into polypropylene melt-blown nonwovens. AUTEX Research Journal, DOI: 10.1515/aut-2018-0043
  8. Buonanno, G., Marks, G.B. & Morawska, L. (2013). Health effects of daily airborne particle dose in children: Direct association between personal dose and respiratory health effects. Environmental Pollution, 180, pp. 246-250, DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.05.039
  9. Buteau, S. & Goldberg, MS. (2016). A structured review of panel studies used to investigate associations between ambient air pollution and heart rate variability. Environmental Research, 148, pp. 207-247, DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.03.013
  10. Cerrillo, J.R., Palomares, A.E. & Rey, F. (2020). Silver exchanged zeolites as bactericidal additives in polymeric materials. Microporous and Mesoporous Material, 305, pp. 110367, DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110367
  11. Cheng, T., Jiang, Y., Zhang, Y. & Shuanqiang, L. (2004). Prediction of breakthrough curves for adsorption on activated carbon fibres in a fixed bed. Carbon, 42, pp. 3081-3085, DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.07.021
  12. Chiang, Y.C. & Juang, R.S. (2017). Surface modifications of carbonaceous materials for carbon dioxide adsorption: A review. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 71, pp. 214-234, DOI:10.1016/j.jtice.2016.12.014
  13. Commission Directive 2000/39/EC of 8 June 2000 establishing a first list of indicative occupational exposure limit values in implementation of Council Directive 98/24/EC on the protection of the health and safety of workers from the risks related to chemical agents at work, http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2000/39/2018-08-21
  14. Czuma, N., Zarębska, K. & Baran, P. (2016). Analysis of the influence of fusion synthesis parameters on the SO2 sorption properties of zeolites produced out of fly ash. SEED Science Research, 10, DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/20161000010
  15. Das, D., Vivekand, G. & Nishith, V. (2004). Removal of volatile organic compound by activated carbon fiber. Carbon, 42, pp. 2949-2962, DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2004.07.008
  16. Deng, L., Yuan, P., Liu, D., Annabi-Bergaya, F. & Zhou, J. (2017). Effects of microstructure of clay minerals, montmorillonite, kaolinite and halloysite, on their benzene adsorption behaviours. Applied Clay Science, 143, pp. 184-191, DOI:10.1016/j.clay.2017.03.035
  17. Duad, W.M.A.W. & Haushamnd, A.H. (2010) Textural characteristics, surface chemistry and oxidation of activated carbon. Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry, 19(3), pp. 267-79, DOI: 10.1016/S1003-9953(09)60066-9
  18. EN 13274-3:2008. Respiratory Protective Devices. Methods of Tests. Determination of Breathing Resistance; The European Committee for Standardization (CEN): Brussels, Belgium, 2008.
  19. EN 13274-7:2008. Respiratory Protective Devices. Methods of tests. Determination of Particle Filter Penetration. The European Committee for Standardization (CEN): Brussels, Belgium, 2008.
  20. EN 14387:2004+A1:2008. Respiratory Protective Devices. Gas Filters And Combined Filters. Requirements, Testing, Marking. The European Committee For Standardization (CEN): Brussels, Belgium, 2004.
  21. EN 149:2001+A1:2009. Respiratory Protective Devices—Particle filtering half Masks—Requirements, Testing, Marking. The European Committee for Standardization (CEN): Brussels, Belgium, 2001.
  22. Haobo, T., Yan, Z., Yue, L., Ying, W. & Xuemei, W. (2017). Emission characteristics and variation of volatile odorous compounds in the initial decomposition stage of municipal solid waste. Waste Manage, 68, pp. 677-687, DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.07.015
  23. Hassounah, I.A., Rowland, W.C., Sparks, S.A., Orler, E.B., Joseph, E.G., Camelio, J.A. & Mahajan, R.L. (2014). Processing of Multilayerd Filament Composites by Melt Blown Spinning. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 131, DOI: 10.1002/APP.40786
  24. Huang, Z.H., Kang, F., Zheng, Y.P., Yang, J.B. & Liang, K.M. (2002). Adsorption of trace polar methy-ethyl-ketone and non-polar benzene vapors on viscose rayon-based activated carbon fibers. Carbon, 40, pp. 1363-1367, DOI: 10.1016/S0008-6223(01)00292-5
  25. Ki-Joong, K. & Ho-Geun, A.H.N. (2012). The effect of pore structure of zeolite on the adsorption of VOCs and their desorption properties by microwave heating. Microporous and Mesoporous Material, 152, pp. 78-83, DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2011.11.051
  26. Krajewska, B. & Kośmider, J. (2005). Standards of Odour Quality Air. Air protection and Waste Issues, 6, pp. 81-191, (in Polish).
  27. Kraus, M., Trommler, U., Holzer, F., Kopinke, F.D. & Roland, U. (2018). Competing adsorption of toluene and water on various zeolites. Chemical Engineering Journal, 351, pp. 356-363, DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.06.128
  28. Kumar, V., Kumar, S., Kim, K.H., Tsang, D.C.W. & Lee, S.S. (2019). Metal organic frameworks as potent treatment media for odorants and volatiles in air. Environmental Research, 168, pp. 336-356, DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.10.002
  29. Makles, Z. & Galwas-Zakrzewska, M. (2005). Malignant gases in the work environment. Work Safety, 9, pp. 12-16, (in Polish).
  30. Michalak, A., Krzeszowiak, J. & Pawlas, K. (2014). Whether exposure to unpleasant odors (odors) harms health?. Environmental Medicine, 17, pp. 76-81, (in Polish).
  31. Namieśnik, J., Gębicki, J. & Wysocka, I. (2019). Technologies for deodorization of malodorous gases. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, pp. 9409–9434, DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-04195-1
  32. Okrasa, M., Hitz, J., Nowak, A., Brochocka, A., Thelen, C. & Walczak, Z. (2019). Adsorption Performance of Activated-Carbon-Loaded Nonwoven Filters Used in Filtering Facepiece Respirators. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16 (11), pp. 1973, DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16111973
  33. Oya A. & Iu WG. (2002). Deodorization performance of charcoal particles loaded with orthophosphoric acid against ammonia and trimethylamine. Carbon, 40(9), pp. 1391-1399, DOI: 10.1016/S0008-6223(01)00273-1
  34. Panek, R., Wdowin, M., Franus, W., Czarna, D., Stevens, L.A., Deng, H., Liu, J., Sun, C., Liu, H. & Snape, C.E. (2017). Fly ash-derived MCM-41 as a low-cost silica support for polyethyleneimine in post-combustion CO2 capture. Journal of CO2 Utilization, 22, pp. 81-90, DOI:10.1016/j.jcou.2017.09.015
  35. Pope III, CA. & Dockery, DW. (2016). Health Effects of Fine Particulate Air Pollution: Line that Connect. J Air Waste Manage, 56, pp. 709-742, DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2006.10464485
  36. Regulation (EU) 2016/425 of the European Parliament and the Council of 9 March 2016 on personal protective equipment and repealing Council Directive 89/686/EEC.
  37. Regulation of the Minister for Family, Labor and Social Policy on the Highest Permissible Concentrations and Intensities of Factors Harmful to Health in the Work Environment; Journal of Laws from 2018, item 1286; International Labour Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 12 June 2018.
  38. Rubahamya, B., Suresh Kumar Reddy, K., Prabhu, A., Al Shoaibi, A. & Srinivasakannan, C. (2019). Porous Carbon Screening for Benzene Sorption. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 38(1), pp. 93-99, DOI: 10.1002/ep.12925
  39. Rybarczyk, P., Szulczyński, B., Gębicki, J. & Hupka, J. (2019). Treatment of malodorous air in biotrickling filters: A review. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 141, pp. 146-162, DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2018.10.014
  40. Schlegelmilch, M., Streese, J. & Stegmann, R. (2005). Odour management and treatment technologies: An overview. Waste Management, 25 (9), pp. 928–939, DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.07.006
  41. Schmid, O., Möller, W., Semmler-Behnke, M.A., Ferron, G.A., Karg, E.W., Lipka, J., Schulz, H., Kreyling, W.G. & Stöeger, T. (2009). Dosimetry and toxicology of inhaled ultrafine particles. Biomarkers, 14, pp. 67-73, DOI: 10.1080/13547500902965617
  42. Stelmach, S., Wasilewski, R. & Figa, J. (2006). An attempt to produce granular adsorbents based on carbonates from used car tires. Archives of Waste Management and Environmental Protection, 4, pp. 107-114.
  43. Szynkowska, MI., Wojciechowska, E., Węglińska, A.& Paryjczak, T. (2009). Odorous emission. An environmental protection issue. Przemysł Chemiczny, 88(6) pp. 712-720. (in Polish)
  44. Tsai, J.H., Chiang, H.M., Huang, G.Y. & Chiang, H.L. (2008). Adsorption characteristics of acetone, chloroform and acetonitrile on sludge-derived adsorbent, commercial granular activated carbon and activated carbon fibers. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 154, pp. 1183-1191, DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.11.065
  45. Wang, G., Dou, B., Zhang, Z., Wang, J., Liu, H. & Hao, Z. (2015). Adsorption of benzene, cyclohexane and hexane on ordered mesoporous carbon, Journal of Environmental Science, 30, pp. 65-73, DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2014.10.015
  46. Xin, Z., Honglei, C., Fangong, K., Yujie, Z., Shoujuan, W., Shouxin, L., Lucian, A.L., Pedram, F. & Huan, P. (2019). Fabrication characteristics and applications of carbon materials with different morphologies and porous structures produced from wood liquefaction: A review. The Chemical Engineering Journal, 364, pp. 226-243, DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.01.159
  47. Xueyang, Z., Bin, G., Creamer, A.E., Chengcheng, C. & Yuncong, L. (2017). Adsorption of VOCs onto engineered carbon materials: A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 338, pp. 102-127, DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.05.013
  48. Yin, T., Meng, X., Jin, L., Yang, C., Liu, N. & Shi, L. (2020). Prepared hydrophobic Y zeolite for adsorbing toluene in humid environment. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 305, pp. 110327, DOI:10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110327
  49. Yue, Z. & Vakili, A. (2017). Activated carbon–carbon composites made of pitch-based carbon fibers and phenolic resin for use of adsorbents. Journal of Material Science, 52, pp. 12913-12921, DOI:10.1007/s10853-017-1389-7
  50. Zendelska, A., Golomeova, M., Golomeov, B. & Krstev B. (2018). Removal of lead ions from acid aqueous solutions and acid mine drainage using zeolite bearing tuff. Archives of Environmental Protection, 44(1), pp. 87–96, DOI:10.24425/118185
  51. Zhang, H., Liu, J., Zhang, X. & Jin, X. (2018). Design of electret polypropylene melt blown air filtration material containing nucleating agent for effective PM2.5 capture. RSC Advences, 8, pp. 7932-7941, DOI: 10.1039/c7ra10916d
  52. Zhang, X., Gao, B., Zheng, Y., Hu, X., Creamer, A.E., Annable, M.D. & Li, Y. (2017). Biochar for volatile organic compound (VOC) removal: Sorption performance and governing mechanisms. Bioresource Technology, 245, pp. 606-614, DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.025
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Agnieszka Brochocka
1
Aleksandra Nowak
1
Rafał Panek
2
Paweł Kozikowski
1
Wojciech Franus
2

  1. Central Institute for Labour Protection-National Research Institute, Lodz, Poland
  2. Lublin University of Technology, Lublin, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Air quality in Warsaw is mainly affected by two classes of internal polluting sources: transportation and municipal sector emissions, apart from external pollution inflow. Warsaw authorities prepared strategies of mitigating emissions coming from both these sectors. In this study we analyze effects of the implementation of these strategies by modeling air pollution in Warsaw using several mitigation scenarios. The applied model, operating on a homogeneous discretization grid, forecasts the annual average concentrations of individual pollutants and the related population health risk. The results reveal that the measures planned by the authorities will cause almost 50% reduction of the residents’ exposure to NOx pollution and almost 23% reduction of the exposure to CO pollution due to the transport emissions, while the residents’ exposure reductions due to the municipal sector are 10% for PM10, 15% for PM2.5, and 26% for BaP. The relatively smaller reductions due to municipal sector are connected with high transboundary inflow of pollutants (38% for PM10, 45% for PM2.5, 36% for BaP, and 45% for CO). The implementation of the discussed strategies will reduce the annual mean concentrations of NOx and PM2.5 below the limits of the Ambient Air Quality Directive. Despite the lower exposure reduction, the abatement of municipal sector emissions results in a very significant reduction in health risks, in particular, in the attributable mortality and the DALY index. This is due to the dominant share of municipal pollution (PM2.5 in particular) in the related health effects.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Bebkiewicz, K., Chłopek, Z., Lasocki, J., Szczepański, K. & Zimakowska-Laskowska, M. (2020). The inventory of pollutants hazardous to the health of living organisms, emitted by road transport in Poland between 1990 and 2017, Sustainability, 12, pp. 1–2, 5387, DOI: 10.3390/su12135387
  2. Berkowicz, R., Winther, M. & Ketzel, M. (2006). Traffic pollution modelling and emission data. Environmental Modelling & Software, 21, pp. 454–460. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.06.013
  3. Buchholz, S., Krein, A., Junk, J., Heinemann, G. & Hoffmann, L. (2013). Simulation of Urban-Scale Air Pollution Patterns in Luxembourg: Contributing Sources and Emission Sce-narios. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 18, pp. 271–283, DOI: 10.1007/s10666-012-9351-1
  4. Calori, G., Clemente, M., De Maria, R., Finardi, S., Lollobrigida, F., Tinarelli, G. (2006). Air quality integrated modelling in Turin urban area. Environmental Modelling & Software, 21, pp. 468–476, DOI:10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.06.009
  5. Costa, S., Ferreira, J., Silveira, C., Costa, C., Lopes, D., Revals, H., Borrego, C., Robeling, P., Miranda, A.I., Texeira, J.P. (2014). Integrating Health on Air Quality Assessment - Review Report on Health Risks of Two Major European Outdoor Air Pollutants: PM and NO2. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B, 17(6), pp. 307–340. DOI: 10.1080/10937404.2014.946164
  6. Degraeuwe, B., Thunis, P., Clappier, A., Weiss, M., Lefebvre, W., Janssen, S., Vranckx, S. (2017). Impact of passenger car NOx emissions on urban NO2 pollution – Scenario analysis for 8 European cities. Atmospheric Environment, 171, pp. 330–337, DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.10.040
  7. Degraeuwe, B., Pisoni, E., Peduzzi, E., De Meij, A., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Bodis, K., Mascherpa, A., Astorga-Llorens, M., Thunis, P and Vignati, E. (2019). Urban NO2 Atlas (EUR 29943 EN), Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
  8. EC (2008). AAQD, 2008. Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2008/50/oj
  9. EC (2015). Urban air pollution – what are the main sources across the world? https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/news/what-are-main-sources-urban-air-pollution
  10. EC (2016). SHERPA: a computational model for better air quality in urban areas.
  11. European Commission Report. https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/news/sherpa-computational-model-better-air-quality-urban-areas
  12. EC (2019). Air quality: traffic measures could effectively reduce NO2 concentrations by 40% in cities. https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/news/air-quality-traffic-measures-could-effectively-reduce-no2-concentrations-40-europe-s-cities
  13. EEA (2018). Air quality in Europe — 2018 report. EEA Report, No 12/2018. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/air-quality-in-europe-2018
  14. EEA (2019). Air quality in Europe — 2019 report. EEA Report, No 10/2019 https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/air-quality-in-europe-2019.
  15. Holnicki, P., Kałuszko, A., Stankiewicz, K. (2016). Particulate matter air pollution in an urban area. A case study. Operations Research and Decisions, 3, pp. 43–56. DOI: 10.5277/ord160303
  16. Holnicki, P., Kałuszko, A., Nahorski, Z., Stankiewicz, K., & Trapp, W. (2017a) Air quality modeling for Warsaw agglomeration. Archives of Environmental Protection, 43, pp. 48–64, DOI: 10.1515/aep-2017-0005
  17. Holnicki, P., Tainio, M., Kałuszko, A., Nahorski, Z. (2017b). Burden of mortality and disease attributable to multiple air pollutants in Warsaw, Poland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14, 1359, DOI:10.3390/ijerph14111359
  18. Holnicki, P., Kałuszko, A., Nahorski, Z., Tainio, M. (2018). Intra-urban variability of the intake fraction from multiple emission sources. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 9, pp. 1184–1193, DOI: 10.1016/j.apr.2018.05.003
  19. Juda-Rezler, K., Reizer. M., Maciejewska, K., Błaszczak, B., Klejnowski, K. (2020). Characterization of atmospheric PM2.5 sources at a Central European urban background site. Science of the Total Environment, 713, 136729 pp. 1–15. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136729
  20. Karagulian, F., Belis, C.A., Dora, C.F.C., Prüss-Ustün, A.M., Bonjour, S., Adair-Rohani, H., Amann, M. (2015). Contributions to cities' ambient particulate matter (PM): A systematic review of local source contributions at global level. Atmospheric Environment, 120, pp. 475–483, DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.087
  21. Kiesewetter, G., Borken-Kleefeld, J., Schöpp, W., Heyes, C., Thunis, P., Bessagnet. B., Terrenoire, E., Gsella, A., and Amann, M. (2014). Modelling NO2 concentrations at the street level in the GAINS integrated assessment model: projections under current legislation. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 14, pp. 813–829. DOI: 10.5194/acp-14-813-2014
  22. Mediavilla-Sahagún, A., ApSimon, H.M. (2006). Urban scale integrated assessment for London: Which emission reduction strategies are more effective in attaining prescribed PM10 air quality standards by 2005? Environmental Modelling & Software, 21, pp. 501–513, DOI:10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.06.010
  23. Pisoni, E., Thunis, P., Clappier, A. (2019). Application of the SHERPA source-receptor relationships, based on the EMEP MSC-W model, for the assessment of air quality policy scenarios. Atmospheric Environment, X4, 100047, pp. 1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100047
  24. Połednik, B., Piotrowicz, A., Pawłowski, L., Guz, Ł. (2018). Traffic-related particle emissions and exposure on an urban road. Archives of Environmental Protection, 44, no. 2, pp. 83–93, DOI: 10.24425/119706
  25. Rith, M., Fillone, A.M., Biona, J.B.M.M. (2020). Energy and environmental benefits and policy implications for private passenger vehicles in an emerging metropolis of Southern Asia – A case study of Metro Manila. Applied Energy, 275, 115240, DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115240
  26. Tainio, M. (2015). Burden of disease caused by local transport in Warsaw, Poland. Journal of Transport & Health, 2, pp. 423–433, DOI: 10.1016/j.jth.2015.06.005
  27. Thunis, P., Clappier, A., Tarrason, L., Cuvelier, C., Monteiro, A., Pisoni, E., Wesseling, J., Belis, C.A., Pirovano, G., Janssen, S., Guerreiro, C., Peduzzi, E. (2019). Source apportionment to support air quality planning: Strengths and weaknesses of existing approaches. Environment International, 130, pp. 1-12, DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.019
  28. Thunis, P., Degraeuwe, B., Pisoni, E., Ferrari, F., Clappier, A. (2016). On the design and assessment of regional air quality plans: The SHERPA approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 183, pp. 952-958, DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.049
  29. WHO (2015). Database on source apportionment studies for particulate matter in the air (PM10 and PM2.5). https://www.who.int/quantifying_ehimpacts/global/source_apport/en/
  30. WHO (2018). Ambient (outdoor) air pollution. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ambient-(outdoor)-air-quality-and-health
  31. WIOŚ (2012). Environment Quality in Mazovian Voivodship in the year 2012. Voivodship Inspectorate of Environment Protection. Report for the year 2012. (in Polish).
  32. Dieselnet_LD (2019). https://dieselnet.com/standards/eu/ld.php 15 JUNE 2020
  33. Instalreporter (2013). https://instalreporter.pl/ogolna/porownanie-emisji-zanieczyszczen-roznych-technologii-grzewczych-wg-raportu-ipts-dla-komisji-europejskiej 25 JAN 2018 (in Polish).
  34. Interia (2019). https://biznes.interia.pl/gospodarka/news-mieszkancy-warszawy-chca-wymieniac-kopciuchy-na-nowe-zrodla-,nId,4268597 26 DEC 2019 (in Polish).
  35. SMOGLAB (2016). https://smoglab.pl/warszawa-ma-prawie-dwa-razy-wiecej-zarejestrowa-nych-pojazdow-na-km2-niz-krakow-wroclaw-i-berlin 20 OCT 2019 (in Polish).
  36. Transportpolicy (2018). https://www.transportpolicy.net/standard/eu-heavy-duty-emissions 10 DEC 2018.
  37. UM (2020). https://www.um.warszawa.pl/aktualnosci/deklaracja-stolicy-na-rzecz-poprawy-jako-ci-powietrza 26 FEB 2020 (in Polish).
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Piotr Holnicki
1
Andrzej Kałuszko
1
Zbigniew Nahorski
1

  1. Systems Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more