W dniach 19–20 września 2019 roku w Wojewódzkiej i Miejskiej Bibliotece Publicznej im. Cypriana Norwida w Zielonej Górze oraz Lubuskim Centrum Winiarstwa odbyła się interdyscyplinarna konferencja naukowa Winiarstwo lubuskie a media. Perspektywa trzydziestolecia 1989–2019. Partnerami wydarzenia zorganizowanego przez zielonogórską Bibliotekę Wojewódzką byli: Instytut Nauk o Informacji Uniwersytetu Pedagogicznego w Krakowie, Stowarzyszenie Bibliotekarzy Polskich oraz Komisja Prasoznawcza Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Odział w Krakowie. Konferencja została objęta Patronatem Honorowym Marszałek Województwa Lubuskiego Elżbiety Anny Polak. Patronat medialny sprawowały czasopisma „Bibliotekarz” i „Poradnik Bibliotekarza” oraz ogólnopolski portal bibliotekarski sbp.pl.

(ze wstępu).

This article presents a profile of the satirical weekly Szopka (A Puppet Show) published in Warsaw between 1922 and 1925 under the auspices of the National Democracy (ND). Committed to a nationalist ideology, Szopka published cartoons and satirical texts lampooning the alleged enemies of Poland and the Poles. Its favoured technique was to caricature and ridicule its targets, both individuals and institutions. Among them were Józef Piłsudski, his policies and his political associates, the Bolsheviks, the Germans and the Jews. To propagate their nationalist worldview the editors made use of a broad range of persuasion techniques.

The ‘incriminated (suppressed) text’ and its removal remains the key object on the conceptual map of censorship studies. In this approach to censor ship the analysis focuses on demonstrable facts of official intervention in the media, the documentation of the process as well as the reconstruction of the effects of individual gagging orders for the author, the publisher and the editor in charge. An alternative, historical approach to censorship takes a much broader view of the subject. It looks at the institutions involved, their competences, procedures and aims (ranging from prevention to repression) as well as the tools at their disposal. The latter approach, systemic and comparative in scope, requires ‘digging up’ considerably more information than establishing the fact of a censor’s intervention.

Galicia’s autonomous status was in fact a doubletrack affair. On the one hand Galicia became a shining example of freedom and autonomy, embedded in the new constitutional order of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, while on the other hand it was tied down to a monarchical absolutism which offered only limited protection of individual rights. The press in particular was caught in the dilemmas produced by this situation, especially in the sensitive areas of political loyalty and religion.

Under the pretext of a discovery of a newspaper allegedly published in 1974 this article discusses reception selection research conducted at the Cracow Press Research Center in the second half of the 20th century.