Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 9
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The number of publications inspired by Bruno Latour’s social thought has significantly grown in Poland over the last decade. Among them there are theoretical analyses, research programms as well as projects of social engineering. This situation makes it urgent to examine the credibility of Latour’s vision of science and society. The present article claims that the premises as well as arguments of the French thinker are not only fallacious but also dangerous. A number of absurdities following from the actor-network theory become evident in the works of the Polish followers of Latour. Thus the article focuses on selected examples of them. In the conclusion the author indicates certain advantages for Latour’s readers and formulates several hypotheses about the possible reasons for Latour’s growing popularity.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Michał Kaczmarczyk
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article analyzes climate fiction utopia ‘Ministry for the Future’ by Kim S. Robinson. The analytical method relies on the framework of sociotechnical imaginaries proposed by Sheila Jasanoff and Sang-Hyun Kim and combines it with the critical history of science and feminist studies of care. Since in the process of writing the novel its author went through numerous consultations with scientists, in the article this oeuvre is analyzed both as a piece of science fiction and as a futurology essay. It is examined how the institutions of science are portrayed, how society of citizens is imagined and how this vision of the future remains trapped in the misconceptions regarding science that result from the Cold War modernistic propaganda of science. On the basis of this analysis, the article offers a discussion of how the imaginaries of Anthropocene are likely to repeat such tropes, unless history of science and sociology of science during the Cold War becomes a necessary part of the Anthropocene studies.
Go to article

Bibliography

Augustine, Grace, Sara Soderstrom, Daniel Milner, Klaus Weber. 2019. Constructing a Distant Future: Imaginaries in Geoengineering. Academy of Management Journal, 62, 6: 1930–60. DOI: 10.5465/amj.2018.0059.
Bastani, Aaron. 2020. Fully Automated Luxury Communism: A Manifesto. Paperback edition. London: Verso.
Bauman, Zygmunt. 2000. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge, UK : Malden, MA: Polity Press; Blackwell.
de la Bellacasa, Maria Puig. 2011. Matters of Care in Technoscience: Assembling Neglected Things. Social Studies of Science, 41, 1: 85–106. DOI: 10.1177/0306312710380301.
Bińczyk, Ewa. 2018. Epoka człowieka: retoryka i marazm antropocenu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Bonneuil, Christophe, Jean-Baptiste Fressoz. 2017. The Shock of the Anthropocene: The Earth, History and Us. London New York: Verso.
Bush, Vannevar, Rush Dew Holt. 2021. Science, the Endless Frontier. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Chaplin, Joyce. E. 2017. Can the Nonhuman Speak?: Breaking the Chain of Being in the Anthropocene. Journal of the History of Ideas, 78, 4: 509–529.
Czapliński, Przemysław, Joanna B. Bednarek, Dawid Gostyński, Andrzej W. Nowak, eds. 2019. O jeden las za daleko: demokracja, kapitalizm i nieposłuszeństwo ekologiczne w Polsce. Warszawa: Instytut Wydawniczy Książka i Prasa.
Engman, Mel, Johanna Ennser-Kananen, Taina Saarinen. 2023. A Diffractive Reading. Pp. 175–86. In: New Materialist Explorations into Language Education, edited by J. Ennser-Kananen, T. Saarinen. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Fisher, Mark. 2009. Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative? Washington, USA: Zero Books.
Golding, Oscar, Guangsheng Yu, Qinghua Lu, Xiwei Xu. 2022. Carboncoin: Blockchain Tokenization of Carbon Emissions with ESG-Based Reputation. Pp. 1–5. In: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC). Virtual Conference.
Griswold, Wendy. 2012. Cultures and Societies in a Changing World. SAGE (no place designation).
Haraway, Donna J. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Herbert, Frank. 2005. Dune. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Jameson, Frederick. 2003. Future City. New Left Review, 21(May/June). Digital Edition.
Jasanoff, Sheilla. 2015. Future Imperfect: Science, Technology, and the Imaginations of Modernity. In: Dreamscapes of Modernity. Chicago, IL. University of Chicago Press.
Jasanoff, Sheilla, Sang-Hyunn Kim. 2015. Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. In: Dreamscapes of Modernity. Chicago, IL. University of Chicago Press.
Kelton, Stephanie. 2020. The Deficit Myth: Modern Monetary Theory and the Birth of the People’s Economy. New York: Public Affairs.
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno. 1996. Aramis, or, The Love of Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lem, Stanisław. 2017. Astronauci: Powieść Fantastycznonaukowa. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
Malm, Andreas. 2020. Corona, Climate, Chronic Emergency: War Communism in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Verso.
Marczak, Michalina, Małgorzata Wierzba, Dominika Zaremba, Maria Kulesza, Jan Szczypiński, Bartosz Kossowski, Magdalena Budziszewska, Jarosław M. Michałowski, Christian A. Klöckner, Artur Marchewka. 2023. Beyond Climate Anxiety: Development and Validation of the Inventory of Climate Emotions (ICE): A Measure of Multiple Emotions Experienced in Relation to Climate Change. Global Environmental Change 83:102764. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102764.
Mills, Charles Wright. 2000. The Sociological Imagination. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Mirowski, Philip. 2018. The Future(s) of Open Science. Social Studies of Science, 48, 2: 171–203. DOI: 10.1177/0306312718772086.
Napiórkowski, Marcin. 2022. Naprawić Przyszłość. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.
Nijakowski, Lech M. 2019. Świat po apokalipsie: społeczeństwo w świetle postapokaliptycznych tekstów kultury popularnej. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
Oreskes, Naomi. 2021. Science on a Mission: How Military Funding Shaped What We Do and Don’t Know about the Ocean. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Robinson, Kim Stanley. 2021. The Ministry for the Future. New York, NY: Orbit.
Russell, Andrew L., Lee Vinsel. 2018. After Innovation, Turn to Maintenance. Technology and Culture, 59, 1: 1–25. DOI: 10.1353/tech.2018.0004.
Suvin, Darko, Gerry Canavan. 2016. Metamorphoses of Science Fiction: On the Poetics and History of a Literary Genre. Oxford: Peter Lang.
Szaj, Patryk. 2022. Pamiętnik z końca świata (jaki znamy). Lusowo: W. Wolno.
Tufekci, Z. 2017. Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Tronto, Joan C., Berenice Fisher. 1990. Toward a Feminist Theory of Caring. In: E. Abel, M. Nelson, eds. Circles of Care. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 36–54.
Wolfe, Audra J. 2020. Freedom’s Laboratory: The Cold War Struggle for the Soul of Science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Yaszek, Lisa. 2008. Galactic Suburbia: Recovering Women’s Science Fiction. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State Univ. Press.
Zaród, Marcin. 2022. When Social Theory is Devoid of Social History. Reply to ‘Transhumanism. Human Nature and Culture: A Preliminary Sociological Contextualization’ by Markus Lipowicz. Studia Socjologiczne, 4: 173-183.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marcin Zaród
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Uniwersytet SWPS
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In the paper I address the problem of consolidation of the borders of the world of science by scientific institutions—in this case, Polish scientific societies of various fields. Basing on the analysis of the statutes of selected societies, I formulate a list of research questions that concern the role of scientific societies in distinguishing between what is considered scientific and what is not. These questions can be used in a more in-depth research. I adopt a constructivist perspective, focus on the ways in which science is produced and separated from pseudoscience, and do not address the (in)accuracy of claims rejected by the scientific world.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Katarzyna Krzemińska
1

  1. studentka studiów II stopnia z socjologii, Instytut Socjologii, Wydział Filozoficzny, Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie, ul. Grodzka 52, 31–044 Kraków
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In this interview, conducted during the XXIII International Congress of Historical Sciences in Poznan, Verónica Tozzi Thompson (professor of Philosophy of History at the University of Buenos Aires in Argentina) discusses historiography in Argentina and recent trends in historical theory, in particular the epistemology of the witness. She addresses important issues concerning key concepts for the philosophy and sociology of history: truth and trust. In addition, Tozzi Thompson discusses the differences and connections between analytic and narrativist philoso-phy of history and recommends some further readings.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Piotr Kowalewski Jahromi
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper analyses Thomas S. Kuhn's theory of the development of science interpreted as a sociological conception. Kuhn's visions of dealing with history as well as eventual controversies connected with its application are discussed.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ewa Kopczyńska
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The new edition in Italian of the articles by the Polish microbiologist and philosopher Ludwik Fleck (1896–1961) edited by Francesco Coniglione offers the opportunity for some considerations around this significant scholar. Fleck anticipates Kuhn’s ideas as well as those of the sociology of science. For him, any epistemology that does not take psychological and sociological methods into account, or that does not concern itself with economics, technology, art, and even politics, is an epistemology imaginabilis. Here we discuss some key points of the essays collected in the book, some observations taken from the rich introduction of the editor, and an inevitable question: Why has Fleck been neglected for so long?

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Emanuele Coco
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

We examined the male-female collaboration practices of all internationally visible Polish university professors (N = 25,463) based on their Scopus-indexed publications from 2009–2018 (158,743 journal articles). We merged a national registry of 99,935 scientists with the Scopus publication database, using probabilistic and deterministic record linkage. Our database (“The Polish Science Observatory”) included all professors with at least a doctoral degree employed in 85 researchinvolved universities. We determined an “individual publication portfolio” for every professor. The gender homophily principle (publishing predominantly with scientists of the same sex) was found to apply to male scientists — but not to females. The majority of male scientists collaborate solely with males; most female scientists, in contrast, do not collaborate with females at all. Gender homophily in research-intensive institutions proved stronger for males than for females. Finally, we used a multi-dimensional fractional logit regression model to estimate the impact of gender and other individual-level and institutional-level independent variables on gender homophily in research collaboration.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marek Kwiek
1
ORCID: ORCID
Wojciech Roszka
2
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Centrum Studiów nad Polityką Publiczną, Katedra UNESCO Badań Instytucjonalnych i Polityki Szkolnictwa Wyższego UAM w Poznaniu
  2. Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Science at the state level consists of two distinct and heterogeneous systems: the global science system and national science systems. National science systems are deeply embedded in global science, and states seek to use global knowledge for domestic economic needs. However, harnessing the wealth of global knowledge can only be done through scientists. Consequently, the scientific strength of states in practice depends on the scientific strength of individual scientists. Their ability to collaborate internationally and to tap into the global scientific network is crucial. By remaining outside it and working within local research programs, the academic community risks being marginalized, losing the interest of national research funding patrons, and losing the ability to influence the development of science.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marek Kwiek
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Centrum Studiów nad Polityką Publiczną, Katedra UNESCO Badań Instytucjonalnych i Polityki Szkolnictwa Wyższego UAM w Poznaniu
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In this text, we analyze the limitations of using academic age as a proxy for biological age in the whole national science system, for which we consider both biological age and academic age of all researchers from all Polish universities, holding at least a PhD degree and participating in global academic science through international publications (N = 20 569). An approximation of a researcher's functioning in global science is having at least one publication indexed in the Scopus database in the analyzed decade 2009–2018. Thus, using the example of comprehensive data from the entire national system of science, we estimate the extent of limitations of using academic age as a proxy for biological age depending on selected independent variables and analyze both the practical and methodological implications of using academic age in academic career research, which is one of the most important components of quantitative studies of science.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marek Kwiek
ORCID: ORCID
Wojciech Roszka
ORCID: ORCID

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more