Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 3
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This study focuses on mapping the groundwater’s vulnerability to pollution in the region of Ouargla, located in the North-East of the northern Sahara, exposed to potential risks of alteration. By applying the methods (GOD, DRASTIC, and SINTACS), coupled with a Geographic Information System (GIS), we were able to identify a medium to high vulnerability trend. In light of the results recorded, the DRASTIC and SINTACS methods prove to be more suitable for our study region. This makes it possible to highlight the recharge zones and land use as being the most vulnerable in the territory studied. The GOD method presents a strong vulnerability trend over 77.02% of the study area. Such a result is directly related to the depth of the water table. It can therefore be argued that this method is far from being representative of the reality on the ground because of these very heterogeneous characteristics.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Abunada, Z., Kishawi, Y., Alslaibi, T. M., Kaheil, N. & Mittelstet, A. (2021). The application of SWAT-GIS tool to improve the recharge factor in the DRASTIC framework: Case study. Journal of Hydrology, 592, [125613]. DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125613
  2. ANRH. (2018). Données des fiches techniques des forages de la Wilaya de Ouargla.
  3. ANRH. (2022). Inventaire des forages de la Wilaya de Ouargla.
  4. Awawdeh, M., Al-Kharabsheh, N., Obeidat M. & Awawdeh, M. (2020) Groundwater vulnerability assessment using modified SINTACS model in Wadi Shueib, Jordan, Annals of GIS, 26:4, 377-394. DOI:10.1080/19475683.2020.1773535
  5. Bera, A., Mukhopadhyay, B. P., Chowdhury, P., Ghosh, A. & Biswas, S. (2021). Groundwa-ter vulnerability assessment using GIS-based DRASTIC model in Nangasai River Basin, India with special emphasis on agricultural contamination. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 214, 112085. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112085
  6. Chakraborty, B., Roy, S., Bera, A., Adhikary, P. P., Bera, B., Sengupta, D., Bhunia, G. S. & Shit, P. K. (2022). Groundwater vulnerability assessment using GIS-based DRASTIC model in the upper catchment of Dwarakeshwar river basin, West Bengal, India. Environmental Earth Sciences, 81,1, pp.1–15. DOI:10.1007/s12665-021-10002-3
  7. Charikh, M., Slimani, R., Hamdi-aïssa, B., Bouadjila, O. & Hassaine, A. (2022). Evaluation of Arid Soil Landscapes Permeability in Algerian Sahara. Al-Qadisiyah Journal for Agricul-ture Sciences (QJAS), 12,2, pp. 12–18. DOI:10.33794/qjas.2022.134247.1050
  8. El Baba, M. & Kayastha, P. (2022). Groundwater vulnerability, water quality, and risk assessment in a semi-arid region: a case study from the Dier al-Balah Governorate, Gaza Strip. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, pp.1–16. DOI:10.3390/w12010262
  9. Elzain, H. E., Chung, S. Y., Senapathi, V., Sekar, S., Lee, S. Y., Roy, P. D., Hassan, A. & Sabarathinam, C. (2022). Comparative study of machine learning models for evaluating groundwater vulnerability to nitrate contamination. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 229, 113061. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.113061
  10. Fannakh, A. & Farsang, A. (2022). DRASTIC, GOD, and SI approaches for assessing groundwater vulnerability to pollution: a review. Environ Sci Eur 34, 77. DOI:10.1186/s12302-022-00646-8
  11. Gao, Y.Y., Qian, H., Zhou, Y.H., Chen, J. Wang, H.K., Ren, W.H. & Qu, W.G. (2022). Cumulative health risk assessment of multiple chemicals in groundwater based on determinis-tic and Monte Carlo models in a large semiarid basin. J. Clean. Prod., 352. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131567.
  12. Gharekhani, M., Nadiri, A. A., Khatibi, R., Sadeghfam, S. & Moghaddam, A. A. (2022). A study of uncertainties in groundwater vulnerability modelling using Bayesian model averaging (BMA). Journal of Environmental Management, 303, 114168. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114168
  13. Goyal, D., Haritash, A. K. & Singh, S. K. (2021). A comprehensive review of groundwater vulnerability assessment using index-based, modelling, and coupling methods. Journal of Environmental Management, 296, 113161. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113161
  14. Griffel, L. M., Toba, A-L., Paudel, R., Lin, Y., Hartley D. S. & Langholtz, M. (2022). A multi-criteria land suitability assessment of field allocation decisions for switchgrass, I, 136, 108617. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108617.
  15. Hamdi-Aïssa, B., & Girard, M.-C. (2000). Utilisation de la télédétection en régions sahariennes, pour l’analyse et l’extrapolation spatiale des pédopaysages. Science et Changements Planétaires/Sécheresse, 11,3, pp. 179–188.
  16. Hamza, M.H. & Chmit, M. (2022). "GIS-Based Planning and Web/3D Web GIS Applications for the Analysis and Management of MV/LV Electrical Networks (A Case Study in Tuni-sia)" Applied Sciences 12, no. 5: 2554. DOI:10.3390/app12052554
  17. Kirlas, M.C., Karpouzos, D.Κ., Georgiou, P.E. & Katsifarakis, K. L. (2022). A comparative study of groundwater vulnerability methods in a porous aquifer in Greece. Appl Water Sci 12, 123.DOI:10.1007/s13201-022-01651-1.
  18. Qian, H. Chen, J. & Howard, K. W.F. (2020). Assessing groundwater pollution and potential remediation processes in a multi-layer aquifer system. Environ. Pollut., 263. DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114669.
  19. Saranya, T. & Saravanan, S. (2022). Assessment of groundwater vulnerability using analytical hierarchy process and evidential belief function with DRASTIC parameters, Cuddalore, India. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. DOI:10.1007/s13762-022-03944-z
  20. Sarkar, M. & Pal, S.C. (2021). Application of DRASTIC and Modified DRASTIC Models for Model-ing Groundwater Vulnerability of Malda District in West Bengal. J Indian Soc Remote Sens, 49, pp. 1201–1219. DOI:10.1007/s12524-020-01176-7
  21. Slimani, R, & Guendouz, A. (2015). Groundwater vulnerability and risk mapping for the Phreatic aquifer in the Ouargla Oasis of Algerian Sahara using GIS and GOD method. Inter-national Journal of AgriculturalScience and Research (IJASR). ISSN(P): 2250-0057; ISSN(E): 2321-0087. Vol. 5, Issue 3, Jun 2015, pp. 149-158 © TJPRC Pvt. Ltd.
  22. Slimani, Rabia, Guendouz, A., Trolard, F., Moulla, A. S., Hamdi-Aïssa, B. & Bourrié, G. (2017). Identification of dominant hydrogeochemical processes for groundwaters in the Alge-rian Sahara supported by inverse modeling of chemical and isotopic data. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21, 3, pp.1669–1691. DOI:10.5194/hess-21-1669-2017, 2017.
  23. Stigter, T. Y., Ribeiro, L., & Dill, A. M. M. C. (2006). Application of a groundwater quality index as an assessment and communication tool in agro-environmental policies–Two Portu-guese case studies. Journal of Hydrology, 327, 3–4, pp. 578–591. DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.12.001
  24. UNESCO. (2020). Rapport mondial des Nations Unies sur la mise en valeur des ressources en eau 2020: l’eau et les changements climatiques. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/notice?id=p::usmarcdef_0000372941
  25. United Nations. (2022). The United Nations World Water Development Report 2022: groundwater: making the invisible visible. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/notice?id=p::usmarcdef_0000380721.
  26. Zhang, Q., Qian, H., Xu, P., Li, W., Feng, W., & Liu, R. (2021). Effect of hydrogeological conditions on groundwater nitrate pollution and human health risk assessment of nitrate in Jiaokou Irrigation District. Journal of Cleaner Production, 298, 126783. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126783.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Rabia Slimani
1
Messaouda Charikh
1 2
Mohammad Aljaradin
3
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Laboratory of Biogeochemistry of desert environments, Faculty of Natural and Life Sciences, Kasdi Marbah University, Ouargla, Algeria
  2. Ouargla Higher Normal School, Algeria
  3. School of Health and Environmental Studies, Hamdan Bin Mohammed Smart University, Dubai, UAE
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Groundwater hydrochemistry of Algerian Sahara (Southwest, Algeria) was used to assess groundwater quality to de-termine its suitability for drinking and agricultural purposes. A total of 26 groundwater samples were analysed for 14 para-meters. Standards laboratory methods were used to determine physicochemical groundwater properties. This study shows that these pH, electric conductivity, total hardness, bicarbonate, and phosphate were within WHO limits. The concentration of magnesium ranging from 30.49 to 120 mg∙dm–3 with an average value of 67.21 mg∙dm–3. 38.56% of the water points analysed have a concentration lower than the value set by the WHO at 75.00 mg∙dm–3. It also showed that 70% of the points studied have potassium concentrations that exceed World Health Organization standards. Groundwater of Algerian Sahara is low in nitrogen (NO3–) and the higher concentration may result in various health risks. The result for this study showed that the water was to be found suitable for drinking purposes except for few samples. Piper diagram indicates that groundwater in Adrar belongs to chlorinated-sulphated, sodium and magnesium facies. The groundwater samples of Adrar present high salinity and low alkalinity fall into the field of C3S1 and C3S2. Based on the RSC values, all samples had values less than 1.25 and were good for irrigation.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ali Bendida
1 2
ORCID: ORCID
Mohammed Amin Kendouci
1
ORCID: ORCID
Abdellatif El-Bari Tidjani
2
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Universiy Tahri Mohammed Bechar, Faculty of Technology, BP 417, 08000 Bechar, Algeria
  2. University of Science and Technology Oran, Laboratory of Management and Water Treatment (LGTE)
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Sand drifting on road networks in the region of the Lower Algerian Sahara is one of the main problems for the sector. Machines are repeatedly deployed to overcome this phenomenon. The long experience acquired while dealing with the removal of sand from roads pushed us to focus on obstacles called "Draas". The purpose of this study is to perform an optimization of these special protective structures called “Draas”, using a reduced physical model. Model tests were performed in flow channel. The principle of modeling the wind transport using a reduced model is to simulate the wind using a liquid stream while respecting the laws of hydraulic and sedimentological similarity. The results obtained are extrapolated to make a normal size prototype.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

A.K. Sebaa
M. Belhamra

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more