Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 7
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance has become a global public health concern in the last few years. Given the widespread rate of recurrence, increasing attention is being turned toward environmental pathways that potentially contribute to antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) dissemination outside the clinical realm. In this study, a metagenome analysis of intestinal virus-like particle fraction (VLPs) from a wild coyote ( Canis latrans) revealed for the first time, multiple ARGs, such as B-lactamases and multidrug efflux pumps. Description of ARGs presence in natural environments is critical to understand the emergence of resistant strains.
Go to article

Bibliography

References:

Li LG, Huang Q, Yin X, Zhang T (2020) Source tracking of antibiotic resistance genes in the environment – Challenges, progress, and prospects. Water Res 185: 116127.
Nurk S, Meleshko D, Korobeynikov A, Pevzner PA (2017) metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler. Genome Res 27: 824-834.
Papp M, Solymosi N (2022) Review and Comparison of Antimicrobial Resistance Gene Databases. Antibiotics 11: 339.
Schroeder CM, Zhao C, DebRoy C, Torcolini J, Zhao S, White DG, Wagner DD, McDermott PF, Walker RD, Meng J (2002) Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli O157 isolated from humans, cattle, swine, and food. Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 576-581.
Subirats J, Sánchez-Melsió A, Borrego CM, Balcázar JL, Simonet P (2016) Metagenomic analysis reveals that bacteriophages are reservoirs of antibiotic resistance genes. Int J Antimicrob Agents 48: 163-167.
Summer EJ (2009) Preparation of a phage DNA fragment library for whole genome shotgun sequencing. In: Clokie MRJ, Kropinski AM (eds) Bacteriophages: methods and protocols, Volume 2 Molecular and applied aspects. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, pp 27-46.
Tian R-M, Cai L, Zhang W-P, Cao H-L, Qian P-Y (2015) Rare events of intragenus and intraspecies horizontal transfer of the 16S rRNA gene. Genome Biol Evol 7: 2310-2320.
Zolfo M, Pinto F, Asnicar F, Manghi P, Tett A, Bushman F, Segata N (2019) Detecting contamination in viromes using ViromeQC. Nat Biotechnol 37: 1408-1412.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

J.J. López-Islas
1
ET. Méndez-Olvera
2
T. Reyes C
2
D. Martínez-Gómez
2

  1. Doctorado en Ciencias Agropecuarias, Autonomous Metropolitan University (UAM), Calzada del Hueso 1100, Villa Quietud, C.P. 04960, Coyoacán, México City, México
  2. Department of Agricultural and Animal Production, Autonomous Metropolitan University, campus Xochimilco (UAM-X), Calzada del Hueso 1100,Villa Quietud, C.P. 04960, Coyoacán, México City, México
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The study was aimed at evaluating microbial contamination on the premises of the sewage treatment plant by determining the concentrations of selected groups of airborne microorganisms. Another objective was to determine the antibiotic sensitivity patterns of isolated strains of staphylococci. The research was conducted in a seasonal cycle, by the impaction method using Merck MAS-100 air sampler. Samples were collected at six sites, each representing a different stage of sewage treatment. The susceptibility of isolated staphylococci was assessed with the disc-diffusion method, following the recommendations of the EUCAST. The results indicate that the microbial population in the air of the investigated area was dominated by mold fungi, whose highest average concentration was recorded at site IV located near the final clarifier (7672 CFU•m-3). Heterotrophic bacteria and mannitol-positive staphylococci were the most numerous at locations where sewage undergoes primary treatment. In each subseuqent stage the number of microorganisms emitted into the air from the sewage was lower. Antibiograms show that more than 50% of Staphylococcus spp. exhibited resistance to penicillin and 20% to rifampicin. In addition, 90% of the analyzed strains were sensitive to other antibiotics. The fungal community included the following genera: Cladosporium, Fusarium, Alternaria, Penicillium, Aspergillus, Aureobasidium, and Acremonium.The highest air contamination with all studied groups of microorganisms was recorded at the locations where mechanical sewage treatment was performed. During the subsequent stages lower numbers of heterotrophic bacteria were emitted into the air. The air in the investigated sewage treatment plant did not contain multidrug-resistant staphylococci.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marta Małecka-Adamowicz
Łukasz Kubera
Wojciech Donderski
Katarzyna Kolet
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Otitis externa is a canine disease of multifactorial etiology in which bacteria plays a significant role. Due to the predominant bacterial etiology otitis is usually treated with antibiotics. However, non-prudent use of antibiotics promotes the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria thus compromising the therapy effectiveness. Currently, the increase of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the biggest threats to global health. For this reason, the aim of the study was to investigate prevalence of the microbiological causes of canine otitis externa and the antibiotic susceptibility of the isolated bacterial strains. The research and sampling were conducted at Veterinary Clinics for small pets in Serbia. Samples were sent to laboratory for bacteriological and mycological testing. Additionally, the sensitivity of the isolated bacteria to antibiotics was evaluated using disc diffusion method. Sixty dogs with otitis externa clinical symptoms were included in the study. Out of a total of 53 positive samples for pathogen presence, bacteria were present in 40. The most prevalent bacteria was Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Proteus spp., while Malassezia pachydermatis was the only isolated yeast pathogen occurring in 36 samples. Generally, the lowest resistance against all bacteria showed enrofloxacin. On the contrary, high resistance to penicillin and amoxicillin was a common finding for G+ and G- bacteria. These results indicate the need for laboratory testing in terms of isolation, identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing, not only in the case of otitis externa in dogs, but in all diseases when it is possible, in order to enhance antimicrobial stewardship and consequently to contribute AMR reduction.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. August JR (1988) Otitis externa: A disease of multifactorial etiology. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 18: 731-742.
  2. Ayrapetyan M, Williams T, Oliver JD (2018) Relationship between the Viable but Nonculturable State and Antibiotic Persister Cells. J Bacteriol 200: e00249-18.
  3. Bassetti M, Vena A, Croxatto A, Righi E, Guery B (2018) How to manage Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Drugs Context 7: 212527.
  4. Bornand V (1992) Bacteriology and mycology of otitis externa in dogs. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd 134: 341-348.
  5. Bourély C, Cazeau G, Jarrige N, Leblond A, Madec JY, Haenni M, Gay E (2019) Antimicrobial resistance patterns of bacteria isolated from dogs with otitis. Epidemiol Infect 147: e121.
  6. Bugden DL (2012) Identification and antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial isolates from dogs with otitis externa in Australia. Aust Vet J 91: 43-46.
  7. De Martino L, Nocera FP, Mallardo K, Nizza S, Masturzo E, Fiorito F, Iovane G, Catalanotti P (2016) An update on microbiological causes of canine otitis externa in Campania Region, Italy. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 6: 384-389.
  8. Dierikx CM, van der Goot JA, Smith HE, Kant A, Mevius DJ (2013) Presence of ESBL/AmpC- producing Escherichia coli in the broiler production pyramid: a descriptive study. PloS One 8: e79005.
  9. EMA/CVMP (2015) Reflection paper on the risk of antimicrobial resistance transfer from companion animals. European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/ reflection-paper-risk-
  10. antimicrobial-resistance-transfer-companion-animals_en.pdf. (Accessed: 24.02.2023.)
  11. EUCAST. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Disk Diffusion Test Manual. Available from: https://www.eucast.org/ (Accessed: 17.02.2023.)
  12. Fernández G, Barboza G, Villalobos A, Parra O, Finol G, Ramírez RA (2006) Isolation and identification of microorganisms present in 53 dogs suffering otitis externa. Rev Cient 16: 23-30.
  13. Forster SL, Real T, Doucette KP, King SB (2018) A randomized placebo-controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of a terbinafine, florfenicol and betamethasone topical ear formulation in dogs for the treatment of bacterial and/or fungal otitis externa. BMC Vet Res 14: 262.
  14. Glavind AS, Kruse AB, Nielsen LR, Stege H (2022) Monitoring antimicrobial usage in companion animals: exploring the use of the Danish VetStat database. Acta Vet Scand 64: 27.
  15. Greene CE (1998) Infectious diseases of the dog and cat. 2nd ed., Philadelphia, WB Saunders, pp 551.
  16. Guardabassi L, Loeber ME, Jacobson A (2004) Transmission of multiple antimicrobial-resistant Staphylococcus intermedius between dogs affected by deep pyoderma and their owners. Vet Microbiol 98: 23-27.
  17. Gwenzi W, Chaukura N, Muisa-Zikali N, Teta C, Musvuugwa T, Rzymski P, Abia AL (2021) Insects, rodents, and pets as reservoirs, vectors, and sentinels of antimicrobial resistance. Antibiotics (Basel) 10: 68.
  18. Hariharan H, Coles M, Poole D, Lund L, Page R (2006) Update on antimicrobial susceptibilities of bacterial isolates from canine and feline otitis externa. Can Vet J 47: 253-255.
  19. Hong JS, Song W, Park HM, Oh JY, Chae JC, Shin S, Jeong SH (2019) Clonal spread of extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae between companion animals and humans in South Korea. Front Microbiol 10: 1371.
  20. Hosseini J, Zdovc I, Golob M, Blagus R, Kušar D, Vengušt M, Kotnik T (2012) Effect of treatment with Tris-EDTA/ chlorhexidine topical solution on canine Pseudomonas aeruginosa otitis externa with or without concomitant treatment with oral fluoroquinolones. Slov Vet Res 49: 133-140.
  21. Hubbuch A, Schmitt K, Lehner C, Hartnack S, Schuller S, Schüpbach-Regula G, Mevissen M, Peter R, Müntener C, Naegeli H, Willi B (2020) Antimicrobial prescriptions in cats in Switzerland before and after the introduction of an online antimicrobial stewardship tool. BMC Vet Res 16: 229.
  22. Jacobson LS (2002) Diagnosis and medical treatment of otitis externa in the dog and cat. J S Afr Vet Assoc 73: 162-170.
  23. Jasovský D, Littmann J, Zorzet A, Cars O (2016) Antimicrobial resistance – a threat to the world’s sustainable development. Ups J Med Sci 121: 159-164.
  24. Kaspar U, von Lützau A, Schlattmann A, Roesler U, Köck R, Becker K (2018) Zoonotic multidrug-resistant microorganisms among small companion animals in Germany. PLoS One, 13: e0208364.
  25. Kiss G, Radvanyi S, Szigeti G (1997) New combination for the therapy of canine otitis externa. I. Microbiology of otitis externa. J Small Anim Pract 38: 51-56.
  26. Kumar S, Hussain K, Sharma R, Chhibber S, Sharma N (2014) Prevalence of canine otitis externa in Jammu. J Anim Res 4: 121-129.
  27. Kumar A, Singh K, Sharma A (2002) Prevalence of Malassezia pachydermatis and other organisms in healthy and infected dogs ears. Isr J Vet Med 57: 145-148.
  28. Lancet T (2022) Antimicrobial resistance: time to repurpose the Global Fund. Lancet 399: 335.
  29. Langendonk RF, Neill DR, Fothergill JL (2021) The building blocks of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: implications for current resistance-breaking therapies. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11: 665759.
  30. Laxminarayan R (2022) The overlooked pandemic of antimicrobial resistance. Lancet 399: 606- 607.
  31. Lilenbaum W, Veras M, Blum E, Souza GN (2000) Antimicrobial susceptibility of staphylococci isolated from otitis externa in dogs. Lett Appl Microbiol 31: 42-45.
  32. Lyskova P, Vydrzalova M, Mazurova J (2007) Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria and yeasts isolated from healthy dogs and dogs with otitis externa. J Vet Med A Physiol Pathol Clin Med 54: 559-563.
  33. Marques C, Gama LT, Belas A, Bergström K, Beurlet S, Briend-Marchal A, Broens EM, Costa M, Criel D, Damborg P, van Dijk MA, van Dongen AM, Dorsch R, Espada CM, Gerber B, Kritsepi-Konstantinou M, Loncaric I, Mion D, Misic D, Movilla R, Overesch G, Perreten V, Roura X, Steenbergen J, Timofte D, Wolf G, Zanoni RG, Schmitt S, Guardabassi L, Pomba C (2016) European multicenter study on antimicrobial resistance in bacteria isolated from companion animal urinary tract infections. BMC Vet Res 12: 213.
  34. Martín Barrasa JL, Lupiola Gómez P, González Lama Z, Tejedor Junco MT (2000) Antibacterial susceptibility patterns of Pseudomonas strains isolated from chronic canine otitis externa. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health 47: 191-196.
  35. Mateus A, Brodbelt DC, Barber N, Stärk KD (2011) Antimicrobial usage in dogs and cats in first opinion veterinary practices in the UK. J Small Anim Pract 52: 515-521.
  36. Morley PS, Apley MD, Besser TE, Burney DP, Fedorka-Cray PJ, Papich MG, Traub-Dargatz JL, Weese JS (2005) Antimicrobial Drug Use in Veterinary Medicine. J Vet Intern Med 19: 617-629.
  37. Morris DO (2004) Medical therapy of otitis externa and otitis media. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 34: 541-555.
  38. Murphy KM (2001) A review of techniques for the investigation of otitis externa and otitis media. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 16: 236-241.
  39. Nuttall T (2016) Successful management of otitis externa. In Pract 38: 17-21.
  40. O’Neill DG, Volk AV, Soares T, Church DB, Brodbelt DC, Pegram C (2021) Frequency and predisposing factors for canine otitis externa in the UK–a primary veterinary care epidemiological view. Canine Med Genet.
  41. O’Neill J (2014) Antimicrobial resistance: tackling a crisis for the health and wealth of nations. Rev Antimicrob Resist pp 1-20.
  42. Patel SJ, Wellington M, Shah RM, Ferreira MJ (2020) Antibiotic stewardship in food-producing animals: challenges, progress, and opportunities. Clin Ther 42: 1649-1658.
  43. Paterson S (2016) Discovering the causes of otitis externa. In Pract 38: 7-11.
  44. Penna B, Thomé S, Martins R, Martins G, Lilenbaum W (2011) In vitro antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from canine otitis externa in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Braz J Microbiol 42: 1434-1436.
  45. Petrov V, Mihaylov G, Tsachev I, Zhelev G, Marutsov P, Koev K (2013) Otitis externa in dogs: microbiology and antimicrobial susceptibility. Revue Méd Vét 164: 18-22.
  46. Pinto Ferreira J, Battaglia D, Dorado García A, Tempelman K, Bullon C, Motriuc N, Caudell M, Cahill S, Song J, LeJeune J (2022) Achieving antimicrobial stewardship on the global scale: challenges and opportunities. Microorganisms 10: 1599.
  47. Pomba C, Rantala M, Greko C, Baptiste KE, Catry B, Van Duijkeren E, Mateus A, Moreno MA, Pyörälä S, Ružauskas M, Sanders P, Teale C, Threlfall EJ, Kunsagi Z, Edo JT, Jukes H, Törneke K (2017) Public health risk of antimicrobial resistance transfer from companion animals. J Antimicrob Chemother 72: 957-968.
  48. Prescott JF, Baggot JD, Walker RD (2000) Antimicrobial therapy in veterinary medicine. 3rd ed., Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University, pp 547.
  49. Rosser EJ Jr (2004) Causes of otitis externa. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 34: 459-468.
  50. Rubin JE, Chirino-Trejo M (2011) Prevalence, sites of colonization, and antimicrobial resistance among Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolated from healthy dogs in Saskatoon, Canada. J Vet Diagn Invest 23: 351-354.
  51. Sahoo KC, Tamhankar AJ, Johansson E, Lundborg CS (2010) Antibiotic use, resistance development and environmental factors: a qualitative study among healthcare professionals in Orissa, India. BMC Public Health 10: 629.
  52. Saridomichelakis MN, Farmaki R, Leontides LS, Koutinas AF (2007) Aetiology of canine otitis externa: a retrospective study of 100 cases. Vet Dermatol 18: 341-347.
  53. Scarborough R, Bailey K, Galgut B, Williamson A, Hardefeldt L, Gilkerson J, Browning G (2020) Use of local antibiogram data and antimicrobial importance ratings to select optimal empirical therapies for urinary tract infections in dogs and cats. Antibiotics (Basel) 9: 924.
  54. Scarborough R, Hardefeldt L, Browning G, Bailey K (2021) Pet Owners and Antibiotics: Knowledge, Opinions, Expectations, and Communication Preferences. Antibiotics (Basel) 10: 1326.
  55. Schmiedel J, Falgenhauer L, Domann E, Bauerfeind R, Prenger-Berninghoff E, Imirzalioglu C, Chakraborty T (2014) Multiresistant extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae from humans, companion animals and horses in central Hesse, Germany. BMC Microbiol 14: 187.
  56. Scott DW, Miller WH, Griffin CE (2001) External ear diseases. In: Small animal dermatology. 6th ed., Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, pp 1203-1235.
  57. Sharma C, Rokana N, Chandra M, Singh BP, Gulhane RD, Gill JP, Ray P, Puniya AK, Panwar H (2018) Antimicrobial resistance: its surveillance, impact, and alternative management strategies in dairy animals. Front Vet Sci 4: 237.
  58. da Silva KC, Knobel T, Moreno AM (2013) Antimicrobial resistance in veterinary medicine: mechanisms and bacterial agents with the greatest impact on human health. Braz J Vet Res Anim Sci 50: 171-183.
  59. So JH, Kim J, Bae IK, Jeong SH, Kim SH, Lim SK, Park YH, Lee K (2012) Dissemination of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli in Korean veterinary hospitals. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 73: 195-199.
  60. Staroniewicz Z, Król J, Cierpisz J (1995) Bacterial and mycologic flora in dogs with otitis externa. Med Weter 51: 667-670.
  61. Święcicka N, Bernacka H, Fac E, Zawiślak J (2015) Prevalence and commonest causes for otitis externa in dogs from two Polish veterinary clinics. Bulg J Vet Med 18: 65-73.
  62. Terziev G, Urumova V (2018) Retrospective study on the etiology and clinical signs of canine otitis. Comp Clin Pathol 27: 7-12.
  63. Ungemach FR, Müller-Bahrdt D, Abraham G (2006) Guidelines for prudent use of antimicrobials and their implications on antibiotic usage in veterinary medicine. Int J Med Microbiol 296 (Suppl 2): 33-38.
  64. Walther B, Tedin K, Lübke-Becker A (2017) Multidrug-resistant opportunistic pathogens challenging veterinary infection control. Vet Microbiol 200: 71-78.
  65. Wong C, Epstein SE, Westropp JL (2015) Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in urinary tract infections in dogs (2010-2013). J Vet Intern Med 29: 1045-1052.
  66. World Health Organization (WHO) (2019) Antimicrobial stewardship programmes in health- care facilities in low-and middle-income countries: a WHO practical toolkit. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/ 9789241515481 (Accessed: 28.02.2023.)
  67. World Health Organization (WHO) (2018) Critically important antimicrobials for human medicine, 6th revision – Advisory Group on Integrated Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (AGISAR) Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241515528 (Accessed: 28.02.2023.)
  68. Zamankhan Malayeri H, Jamshidi S, Zahraei Salehi T (2010) Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of bacteria causing otitis externa in dogs. Vet Res Commun 34: 435-444.
  69. Ziółkowska G, Nowakiewicz A (2004) Occurrence of the genus Malassezia yeasts in the external ear canal of dogs. Med Weter 60: 310-313.
  70. Zur G, Lifshitz B, Bdolah-Abram T (2011) The association between the signalment, common causes of canine otitis externa and pathogens. J Small Anim Pract 52: 254-258.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

N. Tesin
1
D. Stojanovic
1
I. Stancic
1
N. Kladar
2 3
Z. Ružić
1
J. Spasojevic
1
D. Tomanic
1
Z. Kovacevic
1

  1. Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovica 8, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
  2. Center for Medical and Pharmaceutical Investigations and Quality Control, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Hajduk Veljkova 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
  3. Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Hajduk Veljkova 3, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Escherichia coli producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) are antimicrobial- -resistant Enterobacteriaceae important in the livestock production sector, especially dairy cows because these antimicrobial-resistant bacteria can be transferred to consumers via consumption. If antimicrobials are continually used in dairy farms, this may result in antimicrobial resistance. Therefore, investigation of antimicrobial resistance and finding new alternative methods for inhibiting ESBL-producing E. coli is essential. Hence, the aim of this study was to examine the ability of selected antimicrobials to inhibit E. coli ATCC 25922, control bacteria and ESBL-producing E. coli isolated from dairy farms. We also investigated the capacity of polyphenol extract from 10 varieties of medicinal plants to inhibit ESBL-producing E. coli using a broth microdilution method. It was found that control bacteria were susceptible to all antimicrobial agents, i.e., ampicillin, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin, chloramphenicol, gentamycin, imipenem, nalidixic acid, tetracycline, and sulfamethoxazole/ trimethoprim. However, ESBL-producing E. coli exhibited both susceptibility and resistance to selected antimicrobials. The polyphenol extracted from Psidium guajava Linn at the lowest concentration was 4.5 mg/mL, which could inhibit control bacteria, but at the same concentration could not inhibit ESBL-producing E. coli. These phenomena indicated that ESBL-producing E. coli had both susceptibility and resistance to antimicrobials. Polyphenol, which could inhibit non-resistant E. coli, could not inhibit ESBL-producing E. coli.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

A. Konputtar
1 2
W. Aengwanich
1 3
B. Saraphol
1
M. Yossapol
1 2

  1. Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Mahasarakham University, 79 Nakhonsawan Road, Talad, Maung, Maha Sarakham, 44000, Thailand
  2. Bioveterinary Research Unit, Mahasarakham University, 79 Nakhonsawan Road, Talad, Maung, Maha Sarakham, 44000, Thailand
  3. Stress and Oxidative Stress in Animals Research Unit, 79 Nakhonsawan Road, Talad, Maung, Mahasarakham University, Maha Sarakham 44000, Thailand
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine prevalence of undesirable bacteria and their antimicrobial profile in samples obtained from a productive farm situated in border region Slanské vrchy (Slovakia), involved in keeping sheep and goats for the purpose of processing raw milk to special products (cheeses). Genus and species identification was carried out by PCR method and MALDI –TOF MS. Isolates thus identified were detected for antimicrobial resistance using the Agar Dilution Method.
Bacteria of Staphylococcus spp. exhibited the highest resistance to penicillin (98% isolates). Isolates from the family Enterobacteriacae showed the highest resistance to azithromycin (90%). At the same time, in isolates of Enterococcus spp. we detected high resistance to linezolid (100%). Our investigation showed that all tested strains were resistant to more than one antibiotic used in this study.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

J. Výrostková
1
I. Regecová
1
E. Dudriková
1
J. Maľová
1
F. Zigo
M. Kováčová
J. Illek

  1. Department of Food Hygiene and Technology, University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy, Komenského 73, 041 81 Košice, Slovak Republic
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This study is aimed to investigate culturable airborne bacteria concentrations and the composition of methicillin-resistant staphylococci in eleven different locations on the basis of specific activities conducted within different parts of the European side of Istanbul. The highest bacterial levels were observed at the Bakirkoy station (1 100 CFU/m3) while the second highest levels were found at the Bahcelievler station (1 040 CFU/m3) in October; the lowest levels (10 CFU/m3) were measured at other different stations (Atakoy, Yesilkoy). Fifteen methicillin-resistant isolates [Staphylococcus hominis (n=11), S. cohnii spp. cohnii (n=2), S. sciuri (n=1), S. capitis spp. capitis (n=1)] were identified. The disc diffusion method was used to identify the antimicrobial resistance of these isolates, it was observed that the most common resistance was to penicillin (P) (n=11), doxycycline (DO) (n=4) and tetracycline (T) (n=5). None of the isolates was resistant to imipenem, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, vancomycin (IPM, AMC, VA). However, multiple antimicrobial resistance was found to be 26.7%. The results of this study revealed the importance of isolated methicillin-resistant staphylococci in the stations with densely active human population and traffic, for public health. As a result, the importance of resting along known shorelines, where culturable airborne bacteria concentrations are much lower, and its importance for human health have been emphasized.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Nüket Sivri
Arzu Funda Bağcıgil
Kemal Metiner
Dursun Zafer Şeker
Selin Orak
Sevgi Güneş Durak
Vildan Zülal Sönmez
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to determine the genetic relatedness, antibiogram and virulence factors of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) isolated from bovine mastitis, associated farm workers, dairy cow farm veterinarians (private veterinarians), veterinary students, and non-veterinary university students. A total of 84 S. aureus isolates (27 from mastitis, 11 from farm workers, 9 from private veterinarians, 22 from veterinary students, and 16 from non-veterinary university students) were used to determine antimicrobial sensitivity patterns using disk diffusion test, virulence factors using PCR technique and phylogenic analysis using pulsed field gel electrophoresis. All S. aureus isolates were resistant to 2 or more commonly used antibiotics. All isolates from mastitis, farm workers, and veterinary students carried the genes encoding coagulase and thermonuclease factors while isolates from non-veterinary university students carried the genes encoding coagulase, clumping, and thermonuclease factors. The mecA gene was detected in 22.2%, 81.8%, 100%, 95.5% and 100% of isolates from mastitis, farm workers, private veterinarians, veterinary students, and non-veterinary university students, respectively. In the phylogenic analysis, 10 (45.5%), 6 (66.7%) and 8 (72.7%) isolates from veterinary students, private veterinarians and farm workers, respectively were more than 80% similar to isolates from mastitis. Results of this study indicate that S. aureus isolates from mastitis milk and those from related dairy cow personnel and veterinarians share similar antimicrobial sensitivity patterns and virulence factors, therefore a common source of bacteria may exist. Furthermore, possible transmission of S. aureus between cows and cow-related personnel and vice versa could also exist.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

M.O. Alekish
Z. Bani Ismail
M. Gharaibeh
L. Abu-Qatous

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more