How to search?
advanced search

Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 82
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:

L’impatto dell’emergenza sanitaria sull’insegnamento dell’italiano e delle lingue. Un’indagine esplorativa

Paolo Nitti Micaela Grosso
Kwartalnik Neofilologiczny | 2022 | No 1 | 104-121 | DOI: 10.24425/kn.2022.141253
Keywords COVID-19 pandemics language education Educational Linguistics Italian Language Teaching
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The health emergency, caused by viruses SARS-CoV-2, has been a major challenge for the teaching of foreign languages and Italian. This essay investigates the main criticalities of distance learning by a representative sample of teachers, in the first phase of the health emergency.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Paolo Nitti
1
ORCID: ORCID
Micaela Grosso
2
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Università degli Studi dell'Insubria
  2. Università degli Studi eCampus

Pandemic Italian. A case of transversal variety

Giacomo Elia
Kwartalnik Neofilologiczny | 2023 | No 4 | 684-697 | DOI: 10.24425/kn.2023.148380
Keywords COVID-19 lexicon linguistic variety Italian of the pandemic special languages
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This work aims to present pandemic Italian, i.e. the variety used during the COVID-19 pandemic. By analyzing its features, primarily lexical, but also morphological and morphosyntactic, as well as the semantic contour that characterises them, I will show that pandemic Italian can be regarded as a transversal variety in the Italian linguistic repertoire.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Giacomo Elia
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Università degli Studi di Sassari

Implementation of The Maritime Labour Convention during the Covid-19 pandemic

Filip Walczak
Prawo Morskie | 2022 | No XLII | 77-94 | DOI: 10.24425/pm.2022.142867
Keywords COVID-19 Maritime Labour Convention healthcare repatriation maritime labour law
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous abuses of labour rights of seafarers have been reported within international community. Seafarers’ rights, stipulated in Maritime Labour Convention of 2006, were violated by bans on going ashore in harbours, as well as by abandonment by seafarers’ employers after the end of contracts, partly as a result of national lockdowns. The Convention, aimed at creating a comprehensive regulation on maritime labour issues, including medical care and health protection, proved to be insufficient to safeguard proper working conditions of seafarers. Consequently, it is necessary to evaluate implementation of the Convention in the period of pandemic, for the purpose of taking into account knowledge and best practice developed in this period in further amendments to the Convention.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Filip Walczak
1
  1. Doktorant w Szkole Doktorskiej Nauk Humanistycznych i Społecznych Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego

Selected issues from the current work of The International Maritime Organization (IMO)

Aleksandra Lubowska Karolina Sypion-Babś
Prawo Morskie | 2021 | No XLI | 117-136 | DOI: 10.24425/pm.2021.139481
Keywords seafarers’ situation COVID-19 pandemic maritime safety protection of the marine environment IMO structure
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The purpose of this publication is to briefly present selected issues, that have been the subject of the work of the International Maritime Publication in the last two years. For IMO this was a period when the organization had to face very serious consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic. It influenced not only the fate of thousands seafarers in this industry, but also the functioning of the Organization itself, forcing to adopt innovative and unprecedented solutions. Their effects are still clearly felt and have an impact on the current as well as future work. Authors would like to draw the attention, inter alia, on issues that have become pivotal in this difficult time and others that focus particularly on aspects related to seafarers’ rights, autonomous ships, fraudulent registration and fraudulent registries of ships, increasing safety in shipping, facilitating maritime trade and protection of maritime environment. Simultaneously, it is worth stressing out that the list of important issues presented in this paper is not exhaustive. The article also briefly presents the organizational structure of IMO.
Go to article

Bibliography

Lost-Siemińska D., Obowiązek stosowania najlepszej dostępnej technologii w ochronie środowiska morskiego, Prawo Morskie 2021, t. XL
Konwencja o pracy na morzu, Dz.U. z 2013 r. poz. 845 oraz z 2019 r. poz. 962
Konwencja o ułatwieniu międzynarodowego obrotu morskiego, Dz.U. z 1969 r. poz. 236, ze zm.
Międzynarodowa konwencja o bezpieczeństwie życia na morzu, Dz.U. z 2016 r. poz. 869
Międzynarodowa konwencja o odpowiedzialności cywilnej za szkody spowodowane zanieczyszczeniem olejami, Dz.U. z 2001 r. poz. 1527
Międzynarodowa konwencja o ograniczeniu odpowiedzialności za roszczenia morskie, Dz.U. z 1986 r. poz. 175, zmieniona Protokołem z 1996 r., Dz.U. z 2012 r. poz. 146
Międzynarodowa konwencja o zapobieganiu zanieczyszczaniu morza przez statki, Dz.U. z 2016 r. poz. 761
Pyć D., Ship Energy Efficiency Measures and Climate Protection, International Community Law Review, 2021, 23(2-3)
Pyć D., Międzynarodowa Organizacja Morska [w:] Leksykon prawa morskiego. 100 podstawowych pojęć, (red.) D. Pyć, I. Zużewicz-Wiewiórowska, C.H.Beck Warszawa 2020
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Aleksandra Lubowska
1 2
Karolina Sypion-Babś
3 4
  1. Zastępca Kierownika Ośrodka ds. IMO przy Polskim Rejestrze Statków S.A., Gdańsk
  2. Przewodnicząca Krajowej Sekcji Bezpieczeństwa na Morzu w Ośrodku ds. IMO, Gdańsk
  3. specjalista Ośrodka ds. IMO przy Polskim Rejestrze Statków S.A., Gdańsk
  4. Przewodnicząca Krajowej Sekcji Prawnej w Ośrodku ds. IMO, Gdańsk

Selected economic problems of Poland – internal and international perspectives

Marian Gorynia Piotr Trąpczyński
Nauka | 2023 | No 1 | 59-76 | DOI: 10.24425/nauka.2023.144946
Keywords international economic relations international value chains COVID-19 pandemic war in Ukraine inflation economic sanctions globalization resilience
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The third decade of the 21st century clearly reminded us of the volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity of the environment in which economies, organizations and individuals operate, bringing at least two serious economic crises. On the one hand, the COVID-19 pandemic brought an unprecedented shock of both demand and supply nature, thus materializing the risks associated with the system of international economic connections constructed over many decades. On the other hand, we are facing a global economic crisis caused by Russia's armed aggression against Ukraine. The aim of the article is to capture the impact of the above-mentioned phenomena on the economic situation in Poland from the internal and international perspective, with the global perspective also taken into account. As part of the internal perspective, the focus was on inflationary processes in the short and long term, taking into account their course and possible countermeasures. As part of the international perspective, attention was drawn to one of the most frequently discussed issues, which is making forecasts and assessments regarding the effectiveness and efficiency of sanctions imposed on Russia and Belarus. The second problem within this perspective, which affects both many European economies and developed economies around the world in a tanginble way, is Europe's dependence on Russia for access to energy resources and on China for production capacity. The third issue from the international perspective are the problems related to the reconstruction of the Ukrainian economy after the war and the development prospects of this economy, paying particular attention to the role that Polish enterprises can play in these processes. Finally, within the global perspective, attention was paid to two issues, namely the so-called economy of moderation and the future of globalization. It was assumed that moderation can be considered a synonym of global rationality and a guarantee of the long-term survival of civilization, and therefore also a special case of the so-called common good. With regard to globalization, understood as an advanced form of internationalization, the focus was on the opportunities and threats for the region of Central and Eastern Europe resulting from significant changes in international value chains in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marian Gorynia
1
Piotr Trąpczyński
1
  1. Instytut Gospodarki Międzynarodowej, Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu

Zmiana postrzegania i doświadczania solidarności w pandemii COVID-19

Jowita Radzińska
Studia Socjologiczne | 2022 | No 3 | 111-136 | DOI: 10.24425/sts.2022.142636
Keywords relacje solidarność pandemia socjologia moralności COVID-19
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

W konsekwencji pandemii COVID-19 pojawiły się nowe potrzeby i ujawniły dawne deficyty, a solidarność okazała się potrzebna w obszarach do tej pory niewymagających wsparcia, co zmobilizowało wiele osób do wspólnotowych postaw i aktywności. W artykule przedstawiono, jak postrzeganie i doświadczanie solidarności zmieniało się w czasie pandemii w podziale na sześć obszarów wyłonionych z materiału empirycznego: relacje i kontakt; wsparcie w sieciach społecznych i ze względu na bliskość; charytatywność; postawy obywatelskie; duchowość i ekologia. Wyniki pochodzą z jakościowego badania podłużnego, prowadzonego od marca 2020 do czerwca 2021 roku, w którym brało udział 25 osób. Kluczowe wnioski dotyczą zmiany postrzegania i doświadczania solidarności wraz z upływem czasu i wyczerpywaniem zasobów. W artykule postawiono pytania o budowanie trwałych postaw i praktyk solidarnościowych.
Go to article

Bibliography

1. Arendt, Hannah. 1991. O rewolucji. Przekład Mieczysław Godyń. Kraków: Dom Wydawniczy Totus.
2. Arora, Gulhima, George Kroumpouzos, Martin Kassir, Mohammad Jafferany, Torello Lotti, Roxanna Sadoughifar, Zuzanna Sitkowska, Stephan Grabbe, Mohammad Goldustcorresponding. 2020. Solidarity and transparency against the COVID‐19 pandemic. Dermatologic Therapy. doi: 10.1111/dth.13359.
3. Arpino, Bruno, Marta Pasqualini, Valeria Bordone, Aïda Solé-Auró. 2020. Indirect consequences of COVID-19 on people’s lives. Findings from an on-line survey in France, Italy and Spain. SocArX. doi: 10.31235/osf.io/4sfv9.
4. Ayalon, Liat, Alison Chasteen, Manfred Diehl, Becca R. Levy, Shevaun D. Neupert, Klaus Rothermund, Clemens Tesch-Römer, Hans-Werner Wahl. 2021. Aging in times of the COVID-19 pandemic: Avoiding ageism and fostering intergenerational solidarity. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 76, 2: e49‒e52. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/ gbaa051.
5. Bartkowski, Jerzy. 2014. Solidarność społeczna i kryzys. Zmiany wartości w Europie i w Polsce w warunkach kryzysu. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Sociologica, 48: 19‒34.
6. Bayertz, Kurt. 1999. Four Uses of “Solidarity”. In: K. Bayertz, ed. Solidarity. Dordrecht: Springer, 209‒220.
7. Beck, Ulrich. 2004. Społeczeństwo ryzyka: w drodze do innej nowoczesności. Przekład Bogdan Baran. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
8. Bernard, Anna. 2017. Cultural activism as resource: Pedagogies of resistance and solidarity. Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 53, 3: 367‒379.
9. Bertogg, Ariane, Sebastian Koos. 2021. Socio-economic position and local solidarity in times of crisis. The COVID-19 pandemic and the emergence of informal helping arrangements in Germany. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 74: 100612. DOI: 10.1016/j.rssm.2021.100612.
10. Bowleg, Lisa. 2020. We’re not all in this together: on COVID-19, intersectionality, and structural inequality. American Journal of Public Health, 110, 7: 917‒917. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305766.
11. Carlsen, Hjalmar Bang, Jonas Toubøl, Benedikte Brincker. 2021. On solidarity and volunteering during the COVID-19 crisis in Denmark: the impact of social networks and social media groups on the distribution of support. European Societies, 23 (sup1): S122‒S140. DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2020.1818270.
12. Cheng, Kar Keung, Tai Hing Lam, Chi Chiu Leung. 2022. Wearing face masks in the community during the COVID-19 pandemic: altruism and solidarity. The Lancet, 399.10336: E39-E40. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30918-1.
13. Chwat, Oliwia. 2021. Social Solidarity during the Pandemic: The “Visible Hand” and Networked Social Movements. Kultura i Społeczeństwo, 65, 1: 87‒104. DOI: 10.35757/KiS.2021.65.1.3.
14. Cluver, Lucie, Jamie M. Lachman, Lorraine Sherr, Inge Wessels, Etienne Krug, Sabine Rakotomalala, Stephen Blight, Susan Hillis, Gretchen Bachman, Ohad Green, Alex Butchart, Mark Tomlinson, Catherine L. Ward, Jennifer Doubt, Kerida McDonald. 2020. Parenting in a time of COVID-19. Lancet, 395: 10231, e64. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30736-4.
15. Comte-Sponville, André. 2000. Mały traktat o wielkich cnotach. Przekład Halina Lubicz-Trawkowska. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza Volumen.
16. Constantinou, Costas S. 2021. „People Have to Comply with the Measures”: Covid-19 in “Risk Society.” Journal of Applied Social Science, 15, 1: 3‒11. DOI: 10.1177/1936724420980374.
17. Córdobaa, Diana, Ana M. Peredob, Paola Chavesc. 2021. Shaping alternatives to development: Solidarity and reciprocity in the Andes during COVID-19. World Development, 139: 105323. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105323.
18. Crow, Graham. 2002. Social Solidarities: Theories, Identities and Social Change. Buckingham: Open University Press.
19. Czapliński, Przemysław. 2015. Zbyt późna nowoczesność. W: J. Żakowski, red. Reforma kulturowa, dostępny: https://nck.pl/badania/raporty/reforma-kulturowa-2020--2030--2040. Dostęp 06.10.2021.
20. De Cremer, David, Geoffrey J. Leonardelli. 2003. Cooperation in social dilemmas and the need to belong: The moderating effect of group size. Group dynamics: Theory, research, and practice, 7, 2: 168.
21. Del Boca, Daniela, Noemi Oggero, Paola Profeta, Mariacristina Rossi. 2020. Women’s and men’s work, housework and childcare, before and during COVID-19. Review of Economics of the Household, 18, 4: 1001‒1017. DOI: 10.1007/s11150-02009502-1.
22. Drozdowski, Rafał, Maciej Frąckowiak, Marek Krajewski, Małgorzata Kubacka, Piotr Luczys, Ariel Modrzyk, Łukasz Rogowski, Przemysław Rura, Agnieszka Stamm. 2020. Życie codzienne w czasach pandemii. Raport z drugiego etapu badań. https://issuu.com/wydzialsocjologiiuam/docs/z_ycie_codzienne_w_czasach_pandemii._raport_z_drug. Dostęp 29.11.2020.
23. Duque, Franco, Isabel, Catalina Ortiz, Jota Samper, Gynna Millan. 2020. Mapping repertoires of collective action facing the COVID-19 pandemic in informal settlements in Latin American cities. Environment and Urbanization, 32, 2: 523‒546. DOI: 10.1177/0956247820944823.
24. Ellerich-Groppe, Niklas, Mark Schweda, Larissa Pfaller. 2020. #StayHomeForGrandma–Towards an analysis of intergenerational solidarity and responsibility in the coronavirus pandemic. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2, 1: 100085. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100085.
25. Fancourt, Daisy, Andrew Steptoe, Feifei Bu. 2021. Trajectories of anxiety and depres- sive symptoms during enforced isolation due to COVID-19 in England: a longitudinal observational study. The Lancet Psychiatry, 8, 2: 141‒149. DOI: 10.1016/ S2215-0366(20)30482-X.
26. Furceri, Davide, Prakash Loungani, Jonathan D. Ostry, Pietro Pizzuto. 2020. Will Covid-19 affect inequality? Evidence from past pandemics. Covid Economics, 12, 1: 138‒157.
27. Goodhart, Darlene E. 1985. Some psychological effects associated with positive and negative thinking about stressful event outcomes: Was Pollyanna right?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1: 216.
28. Goodwin, Robin, Wai Kai Hou, Shaojing Sun, Menachem Ben-Ezra. 2020. Quarantine, distress and interpersonal relationships during COVID-19. General psychiatry, 33, 6. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2020-100385.
29. Granovetter, Mark. 1973. The Strength of Weak Ties, American Journal of Sociology, 78, 6: 1360‒1380.
30. Hanel, Paul HP, Lukas J. Wolf. 2020. Leavers and Remainers after the Brexit referendum: More united than divided after all?. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59, 2: 470‒493. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12359.
31. Hansson, Pia, Audur Birna Stefansdottir. 2021. Nordic solidarity and COVID-19. Small States & Territories, 4, 1: 29‒44. https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/74990.
32. Hardoš, Pavol, Zuzana Madarová. 2021. On the Forms of Vulnerability and Ungrievability in the Pandemic. Mezinárodní vztahy, 56, 4: 119‒130. DOI: 10.32422/mv-cjir.1819.
33. Herer, Michał. 2017. Pochwała przyjaźni, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
34. Jetten, Jolanda. 2020. Together apart: The psychology of COVID-19. Sage.
35. Kiciński, Krzysztof. 1983. Posłowie. W: M. Ossowska. O człowieku, moralności i nauce. Miscellanea. Warszawa: PWN.
36. Kilkey, Majella, Louise Ryan. 2021. Unsettling events: understanding migrants’ responses to geopolitical transformative episodes through a life-course lens. International Migration Review, 55, 1: 227‒253. DOI: 10.1177/0197918320905507.
37. Kneuer, Marianne, Michael Corsten, Hannes Schammann, Patrick Kahle, Stefan Wallaschek, Franziska Ziegler. 2021. Claiming solidarity: A multilevel discursive reconstruction of solidarity. European Journal of Social Theory. DOI: 10.1177/13684310211045794.
38. Knize, Veronika, Lina Tobler, Bernhard Christoph, Lukas Fervers, Marita Jacob. 2021. Workin’ moms ain’t doing so bad: Evidence on the gender gap in working hours at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Family Research, 34, 1: 161‒192. DOI: 10.20377/jfr-714.
39. Kołakowski, Leszek. 2012. O solidarności z małej litery pisanej. W: L. Balcerowicz, red. Odkrywając wolność. Przeciw zniewoleniu umysłów. Poznań: Zysk i S-ka Wydawnictwo.
40. Lachance, Erik L. 2020. COVID-19 and its impact on volunteering: moving towards virtual volunteering. Leisure Sciences, 43, 1-2: 104‒110. DOI: 10.1080/01490400.2020.1773990.
41. Leal Filho, Walter, Luciana Londero Brandli, Amanda Lange Salvia, Lez Rayman-Bacchus, Johannes Platje. 2020. COVID-19 and the UN Sustainable Development Goals: Threat to Solidarity or an Opportunity? Sustainability, 12, 13: 5343. DOI: 10.3390/su12135343.
42. Marody, Mirosława. 2014. Jednostka po nowoczesności. Perspektywa socjologiczna. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
43. Maio, Gregory R., James M. Olson, Mark M. Bernard, Michelle A. Luke. 2006. Ideologies, values, attitudes, and behavior. In: R. T. Serpe, ed. Handbook of social psychology. Boston: Springer, MA, 283‒308.
44. Marston, Cicely, Alicia Renedo, Sam Miles. 2020. Community participation is crucial in a pandemic. The Lancet, 395, 10238: 1676‒1678. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31054-0.
45. Mishra, Chinmayee, Navaneeta Rath. 2020. Social solidarity during a pandemic: Through and beyond Durkheimian Lens. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2, 1: 100079. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100079.
46. Modrzyk, Ariel. 2020. Normy średniego zasięgu i kwestia normatywnej integracji społecznej. Studia Socjologiczne, 237, 2: 39‒62. DOI: 10.24425/sts.2020.132461.
47. Morgan, David H. 1996. Family connections: An introduction to family studies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
48. Neale, Bren. 2019. What is qualitative longitudinal research? Oxford: Bloomsbury Publishing.
49. Nogal, Agnieszka. 2013. Solidarność jako wartość polityczna. Civitas. Studia z filozofii polityki, 15: 99‒116. DOI: 10.35757/CIV.2013.15.05.
50. Nolan, Ryan. 2021. ‘We are all in this together!’Covid-19 and The Lie of Solidarity. Irish Journal of Sociology, 29, 1: 102‒106. DOI: 10.1177/0791603520940967.
51. Nowak, Stefan. 1979. System wartości społeczeństwa polskiego. Studia Socjologiczne, 4: 155–173.
52. Ossowska, Maria. 1983. Etyka, świat i życie. W: M. Ossowska. O człowieku, moralności i nauce. Miscellanea. Warszawa: PWN.
53. Ossowska, Maria. 1967. Szkic autobiograficzny, Polska, nr 1. W: M. Ossowska. O człowieku, moralności i nauce. Miscellanea. Warszawa: PWN.
54. Ossowska, Maria. 2000. Normy moralne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
55. Ossowska, Maria. 2005. Socjologia moralności. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
56. Pawlik, Wojciech, red. 2016. Empatia i moralność a życie społeczne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
57. Perry, Brea L., Brian Aronson, Bernice A. Pescosolido. 2021. Pandemic precarity: COVID-19 is exposing and exacerbating inequalities in the American heartland. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118, 8: e2020685118. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2020685118.
58. Pfattheicher, Stefan, Laila Nockur, Robert Böhm, Claudia Sassenrath, Michael Bang Petersen. 2020. The emotional path to action: Empathy promotes physical distancing and wearing of face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychological science, 31, 11: 1363‒1373. DOI: 10.1177/0956797620964422.
59. Pieh, Christoph, Teresa O´Rourke, Sanja Budimir, Thomas Probst. 2021. Correction: Relationship quality and mental health during COVID-19 lockdown. Plos one, 16, 9: e0257118. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257118.
60. Putnam, Robert D. 2008. Samotna gra w kręgle. Upadek i odrodzenie wspólnot lokalnych w Stanach Zjednoczonych. Przekład Przemysław Sadura i Sebastian Szymański. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne.
61. Radzińska, Jowita. 2014. Solidarność: definicja i konteksty. Etyka, 48: 58–68. DOI: 10.14394/etyka.470.
62. Radzińska, Jowita, Paula Pustułka. 2021. A Win for the Middle Class? A Qualitative Study Mapping “Benefits” from the National Quarantine. Kultura i Społeczeństwo, 65, 1: 43‒63. DOI: 10.35757/KiS.2021.65.1.1.
63. Riesman, David, Nathan Glazer, Reuel Denney. 1996. Samotny tłum. Przekład Jan Strzelecki. Warszawa: Warszawskie Wydawnictwo Literackie “Muza”.
64. Saldaña, Johnny. 2014. Coding and analysis strategies. The Oxford handbook of qualitative research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65. Sanderson, Rebecca, Mike Prentice, Lukas Wolf, Netta Weinstein, Tim Kasser, Tom Crompton. 2019. Strangers in a strange land: Relations between perceptions of others’ values and both civic engagement and cultural estrangement. Frontiers in psychology, 10: 559. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00559.
66. Sangiovanni, Andrea. 2015. Solidarity as joint action. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 32.4: 340–359. DOI: 10.1111/japp.12130.
67. Schwiertz, Helge, Helen Schwenken. 2020. Introduction: inclusive solidarity and citizenship along migratory routes in Europe and the Americas, Citizenship Studies, 24, 4: 405‒423. DOI: 10.1080/13621025.2020.1755155.
68. Settersten Jr, Richard A., Laura Bernardi, Juho Härkönen, Toni C. Antonucci, Pearl A. Dykstra, Jutta Heckhausen, Diana Kuh, Ulrich Karl Mayer, Phyllis Moen, Jeylan T. Mortimer, Clara H. Mulder, Timothy M. Smeeding, Tanja van der Lippe, Gunhild O. Hagestad, Martin Kohli, Rene Levy, Ingrid Schoon, Elizabeth Thomson. 2020. Understanding the effects of Covid-19 through a life course lens. Advances in Life Course Research, 45: 100360. DOI: 10.1016/j.alcr.2020.100360.
69. Stok, Marijn F., Michèlle Bal, Mara A. Yerkes, John B. F. de Wit. 2021. Social Inequality and Solidarity in Times of COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 12: 6339. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18126339.
70. Sztompka, Piotr. 1997. Kulturowe imponderabilia szybkich zmian społecznych. Zaufanie, lojalność, solidarność. Studia Socjologiczne, 4, 147: 5‒20.
71. Vandenberghe, Frédéric, Jean-François Véran. 2021. The Pandemic as a Global Social Total Fact. In: G. Delanty, eds. Pandemics, Politics, and Society: Critical Perspectives on the Covid-19 Crisis. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 171‒188. DOI: 10.1515/9783110713350-012.
72. Voicu, Bogdan, Edurne Bartolome Peral, Horatiu Rusu, Gergely Rosta, Mircea Comşa, Octavian-Marian Vasile, Lluis Coromina, Claudiu Tufis. 2021. COVID-19 and orientations towards solidarity: the cases of Spain, Hungary, and Romania. European Societies, 23 (sup1): S887‒S904. DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2020.1852439.
73. Tomasini, Floris. 2021. Solidarity in the Time of COVID-19?. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 30, 2: 234–247. DOI: 10.1017/S0963180120000791.
74. West-Oram, Peter. 2021. Solidarity is for other people: identifying derelictions of solidarity in responses to COVID-19. Journal of Medical Ethics, 47, 2: 65‒68. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106522.
75. WHO Solidarity Trial Consortium. 2021. Repurposed antiviral drugs for COVID-19— interim WHO SOLIDARITY trial results. New England Journal of medicine, 384, 6: 497‒511. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2023184.
76. Wildt, Andreas. 1999. Solidarity: its history and contemporary definition. In: K. Bayertz, ed. Solidarity. Dordrecht: Springer, 209‒220.
77. Wilson, John, Mark Musick. 1997. Who cares? Toward an integrated theory of volunteer work. American Sociological Review, 62, 5: 694–713. DOI: 10.2307/2657355.
78. Wolf, Lukas J., Geoffrey Haddock, Antony S. Manstead, Gregory R. Maio. 2020. The importance of (shared) human values for containing the COVID‐19 pandemic. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59, 3: 618‒627. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12401.
79. Wróblewski, Michał, Andrzej Meler, Łukasz Afeltowicz. 2020. Ryzyko, zaufanie, choroby zakaźne. Polki i Polacy o pandemii. https://repozytorium.umk.pl/bitstream/handle/item/6434/UMK_pandemia.pdf?sequence=3. Dostęp 07.10.2021.


Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jowita Radzińska
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. SWPS Uniwersytet Humanistycznospołeczny

Bezpieczeństwo ekonomiczne a pandemia

Katarzyna Żukrowska
ACADEMIA. Magazyn Polskiej Akademii Nauk | 2023 | No 1 (73) Bezpieczeństwo | 66-69 | DOI: 10.24425/academiaPAN.2023.146448
Keywords ekonomia pandemia COVID-19 współpraca międzynarodowa
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Przez pewien czas żyliśmy w warunkach, w których nie zwracaliśmy uwagi na stan bezpieczeństwa w jego różnych aspektach: militarnym, ekonomicznym, społecznym czy zdrowotnym.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Katarzyna Żukrowska
1
  1. Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie

Identification of Face Mask Waste Generation and Processing in Tourist Areas with Thermo-Chemical Process

Mega Mutiara Sari Takanobu Inoue Iva Yenis Septiariva I Wayan Koko Suryawan Shigeru Kato Regil Kentaurus Harryes Kuriko Yokota Suprihanto Notodarmojo Sapta Suhardono Bimastyaji Surya Ramadan
Archives of Environmental Protection | 2022 | 48 | 2 | 79-85 | DOI: 10.24425/aep.2022.140768
Keywords waste management, COVID-19, mask
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The very high need for personal protective equipment (PPE) impacts the waste generated after using these tools. Therefore, to deal with mask waste during the COVID-19 pandemic, this study was carried out on the processing of mask waste using a thermal process and studied how the potential of this process was for the effectiveness of mask waste processing during the pandemic. This research was conducted on Honeymoon Beach by collecting data on mask waste generated during the pandemic, then measuring the waste proximate, ultimate, and calorific value and testing the thermal process using TGA and Piro GC-MS measurements. Most waste masks found on Honeymoon Beach are non-reusable masks, 94.74%, while reusable masks are 5.26%. The waste is then subjected to thermal processing and analysis using TGA and Piro GC-MS. Based on the data obtained, the thermal process can reduce the mass of non-reusable and reusable mask samples by 99.236% and 88.401%, respectively.The results of the Piro GC-MS analysis show that the lit mask waste will produce fragments of compounds that can be reused as fuel. The process is simple and easy and produces residues that can be reused to reduce environmental pollution due to waste generation during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Akhbarizadeh, R., Dobaradaran, S., Nabipour, I., Tangestani, M., Abedi, D., Javanfekr, F., Jeddi, F. & Zendehboodi, A. (2021). Abandoned Covid-19 personal protective equipment along the Bushehr shores, the Persian Gulf: An emerging source of secondary microplastics in coastlines. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 168, 112386. DOI:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112386
  2. Ammendolia, J., Saturno, J., Brooks, A. L., Jacobs, S. & Jambeck, J. R. (2021). An emerging source of plastic pollution: Environmental presence of plastic personal protective equipment (PPE) debris related to COVID-19 in a metropolitan city. Environmental Pollution, 269, 116160. DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116160
  3. Ayse, L. A., Dempster, E., Aparsi, T. D., Bawan, M., Arredondo, M. C., Chau, C., Chandler, K. D., Dobri-jevic, Hailes, H., Lettieri, P., Liu, C., Medda, F., Michie, F., Michie, S., Miodownik, M., Purkiss, D. & Ward, J. (2020). The enviromnetal dangers of employing single-use face masks as parts of a COVID-19 exit strategy. UCL Open: Environment.
  4. Benson, N. U., Fred-Ahmadu, O. H., Bassey, D. E. & Atayero, A. A. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic and emerging plastic-based personal protective equipment waste pollution and management in Africa. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 9(3), 105222. DOI:10.1016/j.jece.2021.105222
  5. Carter, E. A., Swarbrick, B., Harrison, T. M. & Ronai, L. (2020). Rapid identification of cellulose nitrate and cellulose acetate film in historic photograph collections. Heritage Science, 8(1), 1–13. DOI:10.1186/s40494-020-00395-y
  6. Cordova, M. R., Nurhati, I. S., Riani, E., Nurhasanah & Iswari, M. Y. (2021). Unprecedented plastic-made personal protective equipment (PPE) debris in river outlets into Jakarta Bay during COVID-19 pandemic. Chemosphere, 268, 129360. DOI:10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2020.129360
  7. Fadare, O. O. & Okoffo, E. D. (2020). Covid-19 face masks: A potential source of microplastic fibers in the environment. The Science of the Total Environment, 737, 140279. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140279
  8. Fatimah, Y. A., Govindan, K., Murniningsih, R. & Setiawan, A. (2020). Industry 4.0 based sustainable circular economy approach for smart waste management system to achieve sustainable development goals: A case study of Indonesia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 269, 122263. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122263
  9. Google Map. (2021). Google Map. https://www.google.com/maps/place/
  10. Jung, S.-H., Cho, M.-H., Kang, B.-S. & Kim, J.-S. (2010). Pyrolysis of a fraction of waste polypropylene and polyethylene for the recovery of BTX aromatics using a fluidized bed reactor. Fuel Processing Technology, 91(3), 277–284. DOI:10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.10.009
  11. Marshall, R. E. & Farahbakhsh, K. (2013). Systems approaches to integrated solid waste management in developing countries. Waste Management, 33(4), 988–1003. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2012.12.023
  12. Miandad, R., Rehan, M., Barakat, M. A., Aburiazaiza, A. S., Khan, H., Ismail, I. M. I., Dhavamani, J., Gardy, J., Hassanpour, A. & Nizami, A.-S. (2019). Catalytic Pyrolysis of Plastic Waste: Moving Toward Pyrolysis Based Biorefineries. Frontiers in Energy Research, 7, 27. DOI:10.3389/fenrg.2019.00027
  13. Mutiara, M., Inoue, T., Harryes, R. K., Suryawan, W. K., Yokota, K., Notodarmojo, S., Priyambada, I. B. & Septiariva, I. Y. (2021). Potential of Waste to Energy Processing for Sustainable Tourism in Nusa Penida Island, Bali. Journal Bahan Alam Terbarukan, 10(200), 96–103. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jbat
  14. Neupane, B. B., Mainali, S., Sharma, A. & Giri, B. (2019). Optical microscopic study of surface morphology and filtering efficiency of face masks. PeerJ, 7, e7142. DOI:10.7717/peerj.7142
  15. Rakib, M. R. J., De-la-Torre, G. E., Pizarro-Ortega, C. I., Dioses-Salinas, D. C. & Al-Nahian, S. (2021). Personal protective equipment (PPE) pollution driven by the COVID-19 pandemic in Cox’s Bazar, the longest natural beach in the world. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 169, 112497. DOI:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112497
  16. Sangkham, S. (2020). Face mask and medical waste disposal during the novel COVID-19 pandemic in Asia. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 2, 100052. DOI:org/10.1016/J.CSCEE.2020.100052
  17. Sari, G. L., Hilmi, I. L., Nurdiana, A., Azizah, A. N. & Kasasiah, A. (2021). Infectious Waste Management as the Effects of Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Social Science and Management Technology, 3(2), 62–75.
  18. Selvaranjan, K., Navaratnam, S., Rajeev, P. & Ravintherakumaran, N. (2021). Environmental challenges induced by extensive use of face masks during COVID-19: A review and potential solutions. Environmental Challenges, 3, 100039. DOI:10.1016/j.envc.2021.100039
  19. Septiariva, Sarwono, A., Suryawan, I. W. K. & Ramadan, B. S. (2022). Municipal Infectious Waste during COVID-19 Pandemic: Trends, Impacts, and Management. International Journal of Public Health Science (IJPHS), 11(2). DOI:10.11591/ijphs.v11i2.21292
  20. Sharma, H. B., Vanapalli, K. R., Cheela, V. R. S., Ranjan, V. P., Jaglan, A. K., Dubey, B., Goel, S. & Bhattacharya, J. (2020). Challenges, opportunities, and innovations for effective solid waste management during and post COVID-19 pandemic. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 162, 105052. DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105052
  21. Singh, E., Kumar, A., Mishra, R. & Kumar, S. (2022). Solid waste management during COVID-19 pandemic: Recovery techniques and responses. Chemosphere, 288, 132451. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132451
  22. Suryawan, I. W. K., Rahman, A., Septiariva, I. Y., Suhardono, S. & Wijaya, I. M. W. (2021). Life Cycle Assessment of Solid Waste Generation During and Before Pandemic of Covid-19 in Bali Province. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management, 16(1), 11–21. DOI:10.46754/jssm.2021.01.002
  23. Suryawan, I. W. K., Septiariva, I. Y., Fauziah, E. N., Ramadan, B. S., Qonitan, F. D., Zahra, N. L., Sarwono, A., Sari, M. M., Ummatin, K. K. & Wei, L. J. (2022). Municipal Solid Waste to Energy: Palletization of Paper and Garden Waste into Refuse Derived Fuel. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 23(4), 64–74.
  24. Swennen, G. R. J., Pottel, L. & Haers, P. E. (2020). Custom-made 3D-printed face masks in case of pandemic crisis situations with a lack of commercially available FFP2/3 masks. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 49(5), 673–677. DOI:10.1016/j.ijom.2020.03.015
  25. Trinh, V. T., Van, H. T., Pham, Q. H., Trinh, M. V. & Bui, H. M. (2020). Treatment of medical solid waste using an Air Flow controlled incinerator. Polish Journal of Chemical Technology, 22(1), 29–34. DOI:10.2478/pjct-2020-0005
  26. Zahra, N. L., Septiariva, I. Y., Sarwono, A., Qonitan, F. D., Sari, M. M., Gaina, P. C., Ummatin, K. K., Arifianti, Q. A. M. O., Faria, N., Lim, J.-W., Suhardono, S. & Suryawan, I. W. K. (2022). Substitution Garden and Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Plastic Waste as Refused Derived Fuel (RDF). International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 11(2), 523–532. DOI:10.14710/ijred.2022.44328
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Mega Mutiara Sari
1
Takanobu Inoue
2
Iva Yenis Septiariva
3
I Wayan Koko Suryawan
1
ORCID: ORCID
Shigeru Kato
2
Regil Kentaurus Harryes
4
Kuriko Yokota
2
Suprihanto Notodarmojo
5
Sapta Suhardono
6
Bimastyaji Surya Ramadan
7
  1. Department of Environmental Engineering, Universitas Pertamina, Jakarta Selatan, Indonesia
  2. Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Toyohashi University of Technology, Japan
  3. Sanitary Engineering Laboratory, Study Program of Civil Engineering Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
  4. Faculty of Vocational Studies, Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia
  5. Department of Environmental Engineering, Institut Technologi Bandung, Indonesia
  6. Department of Environmental Science, Universitas Sebelas Maret., Surakarta Central Java, Indonesia
  7. Department of Environmental Engineering, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia

Hypertension and Gastrointestinal Bleed in COVID-19 Patients: Associations with Mortality, Acute Kidney Injury, Vasopressor Use, and Mechanical Ventilation Use

Igor Brodskiy Joshua Fogel Aaron Douen Justin Wagner John Trillo
Folia Medica Cracoviensia | 2023 | Vol. 63 | No 4 | 99-108 | DOI: 10.24425/fmc.2023.148762
Keywords Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage hypertension COVID-19
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

There are mixed findings on the association of hypertension or gastrointestinal bleed (GIB) with mortality in COVID-19 patients but no research on the combination of both hypertension and GIB with mortality in COVID-19 patients. We study in COVID-19 patients the association of hypertension and GIB with mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), vasopressor use, and/or mechanical ventilation. This is a retro-spective study of COVID-19 patients who were categorized into groups of no GIB/no hypertension (n = 653), yes hypertension/no GIB (n = 1,620), yes GIB/no hypertension (n = 104), or yes GIB/yes hypertension (n = 334). Covariates included demographics and medical history variables. In the multi-variate logistic regression analysis for the composite outcome of mortality, AKI, vasopressor use, and/or mechanical ventilation use, yes hypertension/no GIB (OR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.13, 1.89, p <0.001) and yes GIB/ no hypertension (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.02, 2.78, p <0.001) were each significantly positively associated with the composite outcome. The yes GIB/yes hypertension group was not significantly associated with the composite outcome. In conclusion, we found that hypertension or GIB alone were each significantly associated with increased odds for the composite outcome while having both hypertension and GIB was protective and not significantly associated with the composite outcome. We recommend that clin-icians be aware of such findings when treating patients with COVID-19, as those with both hypertension and GIB may not need as aggressive treatment as compared to those with either hypertension or GIB.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Igor Brodskiy
1
Joshua Fogel
2
Aaron Douen
1
Justin Wagner
1
John Trillo
1
  1. Department of Internal Medicine, South Brooklyn Health, Brooklyn, New York, USA
  2. Department of Management, Marketing and Entrepreneurship, Brooklyn College, Brooklyn, New York, USA

Wywiad online jako nowa rzeczywistość badawcza w kontekście badań nad feminizacją pandemii

Aneta Ostaszewska Marta Pietrusińska
Studia Socjologiczne | 2023 | No 3 | 37-58 | DOI: 10.24425/sts.2023.147160
Keywords kobiety refleksyjność metody jakościowe pandemia COVID-19 wywiad online
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Niniejszy artykuł jest próbą refleksji nad metodologicznymi wyzwaniami, jakie pojawiły się w czasie pandemii COVID-19 podczas realizacji jakościowej części projektu badawczego poświęconego feminizacji pandemii. W ramach badań prowadziłyśmy indywidualne wywiady online z kobietami pracującymi na uczelni wyższej. W niniejszym tekście bazując na doświadczeniach własnych z badania przeprowadzonego online oraz odwołując się do dyskusji w kręgu polskich badaczek i badaczy jakościowych aktualizujemy popularne mity z obszaru metodologii badań jakościowych dotyczące wywiadów zdalnych. Ponadto, w związku z tym, że zespół badawczy pracował tylko i wyłącznie w formie zdalnej, podejmujemy także refleksję nad wpływem pracy online na prowadzenie badań i naszą postawę badawczą.
Go to article

Bibliography

1. Andrejuk, Katarzyna. 2020. Online qualitative research in immigrant communities: Opportunities and challenges during the pandemic. Ask: Research and Methods, 29, 1: 55–73. DOI: 10.18061/ask.v29i1.0004.
2. Acker, Sandra. 2000. In/out/side: Positioning the researcher in feminist qualitative research. Resources for Feminist Research, 28, 1–2: 172–189.
3. Adams-Hutcheson, Gail, Robin Longhurst. 2017. ‘At least in person there would have been a cup of tea’: Interviewing via Skype. Area, 49, 2: 148–155. DOI: 10.1111/area.12306.
4. Archibald, Mandy M., Rachel C. Ambagtsheer, G. Casey Mavourneen, Michael Lawless. 2019. Using Zoom Videoconferencing for Qualitative Data Collection: Perceptions and Experiences of Researchers and Participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18. DOI: 10.1177/1609406919874596.
5. Australian National University (2020) Guide to Fieldwork Strategies in Response to COVID-19. https://www.anu.edu.au/files/guidance/ANU%20Guide%20to%20Fieldwork%20Strategies%20in%20Response%20to%20COVID-19%2C%20v1.0.pdf. Dostęp 11.03.2023.
6. Bampton, Robert, Christopher Cowton, Yvonne Downs. 2013. The E-Interview in Qualitative Research. In: N. Sappleton, ed. Advancing Research Methods with New Technologies. Portland: International Science Reference, 329–343.
7. Barclay, Kate, Sonia Garcia. 2020. Adapting Research Methodologies in the COVID-19 Pandemic. https://earthlab.uw.edu/2020/07/adapting-research-methodologies-inthe-covid-19-pandemic/. Dostęp 11.03.2023.
8. Basch, Johannes M., Klaus G. Melchers, Anja Kurz, Maya Krieger, Linda Miller. 2021. It Takes More Than a Good Camera: Which Factors Contribute to Differences Between Face-to-Face Interviews and Videoconference Interviews Regarding Performance Ratings and Interviewee Perceptions?. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36: 921–940. DOI: 10.1007/s10869-020-09714-3.
9. Batorski, Dominik, Marta Olcoń-Kubicka. 2006. Prowadzenie badań przez Internet-podstawowe zagadnienia metodologiczne. Studia Socjologiczne, 3: 99–132. https://www.studiasocjologiczne.pl/img_upl/studia_socjologiczne_2006_nr3_s.99_132.pdf Dostęp: 10.02.2023.
10. Binder, Piotr. 2021. The Social Experiment of Remote Work Forced by the Pandemic from a Qualitative Research Perspective. Kultura i Społeczeństwo, 65(1): 65-86. DOI: 10.35757/KiS.2021.65.1.2.
11. Binder, Piotr. 2022. Praca zdalna w czasie pandemii i jej implikacje dla rodzin z dziećmi–badanie jakościowe. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, 18(1): 82-110. DOI: 10.18778/1733-8069.18.1.05.
12. Brown, Nicole. 2018. Video-Conference Interviews: Ethical and Methodological Concerns in the Context of Health Research. SAGE Research Methods Cases. DOI: 10.4135/9781526441812.
13. Bryman, Alan. 2012. Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Day, Suzanne. 2012. A Reflexive Lens: Exploring Dilemmas of Qualitative Methodology through the Concept of Reflexivity. Qualitative Sociology Review, 8, 1: 60–85. DOI: 10.18778/1733-8077.8.1.04.
15. Deakin, Hannah, Kelly Wakefield. 2014. Skype interviewing: reflections of two PhD researchers. Qualitative Research,14, 5: 603–616. DOI: 10.1177/1468794113488126.
16. Dolińska, Anna, Kamil Łuczaj, Olga Kurek-Ochmańska. 2022. Metoda biograficzna w kontekście badań jakościowych realizowanych zdalnie – możliwości, ograniczenia i aspekty etyczne. Przegląd Socjologiczny, 71, 1: 61–84. DOI: 10.26485/PS/2022/71.1/3.
17. Dwyer, Sonia C., Jennifer L. Buckle. 2009. The Space Between: On Being an Insider-Outsider in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8, 1: 54–63. DOI: 10.1177/160940690900800105.
18. England, Kim. 1994. Getting Personal: Reflexivity, Positionality, and Feminist Research. The Professional Geographer, 46, 1: 80–89.
19. Elwood, Sarah A., Deborah G. Martin. 2000. “Placing” Interviews: Location and Scales of Power in Qualitative Research. The Professional Geographer, 52, 4: 649–657. DOI: 10.1111/0033-0124.00253.
20. Federacja Konsumentów. 2021. Wykluczenie cyfrowe podczas pandemii. Dostęp oraz korzystanie z internetu i komputera w wybranych grupach społecznych, http://www.federacja-konsumentow.org.pl/p,1689,dad1c,raport-fk-wykluczenie-cyfrowe.pdf. Dostęp 09.03.2023.
21. Finch, Janet. 1993. ‘It’s great to have someone to talk to’: Ethics and politics of interviewing women. Open University Press.
22. Goffman, Erving. 2000. Człowiek w teatrze życia codziennego. Przekład Helena Datner-Śpiewak, Paweł Śpiewak. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
23. Górak-Sosnowska, Katarzyna, Lidia Tomaszewska. 2022. Administracja uczelni w dobie pandemii. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
24. Hałas, Elżbieta. 2016. Refleksyjny podmiot w świecie społecznym. O paradygmacie i założeniach socjologii interpretacyjnej. Roczniki Nauk Społecznych, 8, 44, 4: 35–50. DOI: 10.18290/rns.2016.44.4-2.
25. Haraway, Donna. 1988. Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14: 575–599.
26. Harvey, Orlanda, Edwin van Teijlingen, Margarete Parrish. 2023. Using a Range of Communication Tools to Interview a Hard-to-Reach Population. Sociological Research Online, 1–12. DOI: 10.1177/13607804221142212.
27. Herzog, Hanna. 2012. Interview location and its social meaning. The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft, 207–218.
28. Hesse-Biber, Sharlene N., ed. 2014. Feminist Research Practice: A Primer. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
29. Hesse-Biber, Sharlene N. 2007. ‘The Practice of Feminist In-Depth Interviewing’. In: S.N. Hesse-Biber, P.L. Leavy, eds. Feminist Research Practice: A Primer. London: Sage, 111–148.
30. Howlett, Marnie. 2022. Looking at the ‘field’ through a Zoom lens: Methodological reflections on conducting online research during a global pandemic. Qualitative Research, 22, 3: 387–402. DOI: 10.1177/1468794120985691.
31. Irgil, Ezgi. 2021. Broadening the positionality in migration studies: Assigned insider category. Migration Studies, 993: 1215–1229. DOI: 10.1093/migration/mnaa016.
32. James, Nalita, Hugh Busher. 2006. Credibility, authenticity and voice: dilemmas in online interviewing. Qualitative Research, 6, 3: 403–420. DOI: 10.1177/1468794106065010.
33. Jemielniak, Dariusz. 2019. Socjologia Internetu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
34. Jenner, Brandy M., Kit C. Myers. 2019. Intimacy, rapport, and exceptional disclosure: a comparison of in-person and mediated interview contexts. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22, 2: 165–177. DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2018.1512694.
35. Johnson, John M., Timothy Rowlands. 2012. The interpersonal dynamics of in-depth interviewing. In: J.F. Gubrium et al., eds. The SAGE Handbook of Interview Research. The Complexity of the Craft. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 99–114.
36. Kalinowska, Katarzyna, Beata Bielska, Sylwia Męcfal, Adrianna Surmiak. 2022. Czy badać? Co badać? Jak badać? Strategie badawcze w naukach społecznych i humanistycznych w pierwszej fali pandemii COVID-19. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, XVIII, 4: 34–59. DOI: 10.18778/1733-8069.18.4.02.
37. Keen, Sam, Martha Lomeli-Rodriguez, Helene Joffe. 2022. From Challenge to Opportunity: Virtual Qualitative Research During COVID-19 and Beyond. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21. DOI: 10.1177/16094069221105075.
38. Kim, Bryan, Bradley Brenner, Christopther Liang, Penelope Asay. 2003. A qualitative study of adaptation experiences of 1.5-generation Asian Americans. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 9, 2: 156–170.
39. Kirk, Jerome, Mark L. Miller. 1986. Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
40. Krouwel, Matthew, Kate Jolly, Sheila Greenfield. 2019. Comparing Skype (video calling) and in-person qualitative interview modes in a study of people with irritable bowel syndrome – an exploratory comparative analysis. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19, 219. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-019-0867-9.
41. Krueger, Richard. 1994. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
42. Kvale, Steainar. 2010. Prowadzenie wywiadów. Przekład Agata Dziuban. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
43. Letherby, Gayle. 2003. Feminist Research in Theory and Practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
44. Lewandowska, Izabela. 2004. Wywiad jako technika zdobywania informacji źródłowych w badaniu historii najnowszej. Echa Przeszłości, 5: 279–299. https://bazhum.muzhp.pl/media//files/Echa_Przeszlosci/Echa_Przeszlosci-r2004-t5/Echa_Przeszlosci-r2004-t5-s279-299/Echa_Przeszlosci-r2004-t5-s279-299.pdf. Dostęp: 11.03.2023.
45. Linabary, Jasmine R., Stephanie A. Hamel. 2017. Feminist online interviewing: engaging issues of power, resistance and reflexivity in practice. Feminist review, 115, 1: 97–113. DOI: 10.1057/s41305-017-0041-3.
46. Lo Iacono, Valeria, Paul Symonds, David H.K. Brown. 2016. Skype as a Tool for Qualitative Research Interviews. Sociological Research Online, 21, 2: 103–117. DOI: 10.5153/sro.3952.
47. Lobe, Bojana, David Morgan, Kim A. Hoffman. 2020. Qualitative data collection in an era of social distancing. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19: 1–8.
48. Lupton, Deborah. 2021. Doing fieldwork in a pandemic (crowd-sourced document), revised version. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1clGjGABB2h2qbduTgfqribHmog9B6P0NvMgVuiHZCl8/edit. Dostęp 02.03.2023.
49. Mason-Bish, Hannah. 2019. The elite delusion: reflexivity, identity and positionality in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 19, 3: 263–276. DOI: 10.1177/1468794118770078.
50. McMaster University. 2020. Guidelines for Fieldwork During the COVID-19 Pandemic. https://hr.mcmaster.ca/app/uploads/2020/05/Fieldwork-Research-GuidelinesCOVID-19-FINAL.pdf. Dostęp: 11.03.2023.
51. Naples, Nancy A. 1996. A feminist revisiting of the insider/outsider debate: The “outsider phenomenon” in rural Iowa. Qualitative sociology, 19: 83–106. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02393249.
52. Narodowe Centrum Nauki. 2020. Komunikat w sprawie realizacji projektów badawczych w czasie pandemii COVID-19. https://www.ncn.gov.pl/aktualnosci/2020-07-13-komunikat-w-sprawie-realizacji-projektow-badawczych-w-czasie-pandemiicovid-19. Dostęp 13.03.2023.
53. Nguyen, Minh Hao, Jonathan Gruber, Jaelle Fuchs, Will Marler, Amanda Hunsaker, Eszter Hargittai. 2020. Changes in Digital Communication During the COVID-19 Global Pandemic: Implications for Digital Inequality and Future Research. Social Media + Society, 1–6. DOI: 10.1177/2056305120948255.
54. Niżnik, Józef. 1972. Wokół formalno-strukturalnej koncepcji mitu. E. Cassirer i C. Lévi-Strauss. Człowiek i Światopogląd, 5: 113–115.
55. O’Connor, Henrietta, Claire Madge. 2017. Online Interviewing. In: N.G. Fielding, R.M. Lee, G. Blank, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 416–434.
56. Oakley, Anne. 2016. Interviewing Women Again: Power, Time and the Gift. Sociology, 50, 1: 195–213. DOI: 10.1177/0038038515580253.
57. Oakley, Anne. 1981. Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In: H. Roberts, ed. Doing Feminist Research. London: Routledge, 30–61.
58. Olser, Lucy, Dan Zahavi. 2022. Sociality and Embodiment: Online Communication During and After Covid-19. Found Sci. DOI: 10.1007/s10699-022-09861-1.
59. Pike, Kenneth L. 1954. Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. Summer Institute of Linguistics.
60. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej. 2012. VIII(1). Socjologia Jakościowa – innowacyjne metody w badaniach jakościowych. http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/PL/Volume18/PSJ_8_1.pdf.
61. Ramazanoglu, Caroline, Janet Holland. 2002 . Feminist Methodology: Challenges and Choices. London: Sage Publications.
62. Reay, Diane. 1996. Dealing with Difficult Differences: Reflexivity and Social Class in Feminist Research. Feminism & Psychology, 6, 3: 443–456. DOI: 10.1177/0959353596063007.
63. Reinharz, Shulamit, Susan E. Chase. 2002. Interviewing women. In: F. Jaber Gubrium, J.A. Holstein, eds. Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Method. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 221–238.
64. Ricoeur, Paul. 1986. Symbolika zła. Przekład Maryna Ochab, Stansław Cichowicz. Warszawa: Aletheia.
65. Ricoeur, Paul. 1991. “Myth as the Bearer of Possible Worlds”. A Ricoeur Reader: Reflection and Imagination. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 482–490.
66. Rosenthal, Gabriele 2018. Interpretative Social Research. Göttingen: University Press.
67. Salmons, Janet. 2014. Qualitative online interviews. Thousand Oaks: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781071878880.
68. Seitz, Sally. 2016. Pixilated partnerships, overcoming obstacles in qualitative interviews via Skype: a research note. Qualitative Research, 16, 2: 229–235. DOI: 10.1177/1468794115577011.
69. Siuda, Piotr, red. 2016. Metody badań online. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Katedra.
70. Ślęzak, Izabela. 2021. Zło konieczne, substytut, szansa – wykorzystanie komunikatora Skype w badaniach jakościowych. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, 17, 4: 88–113. DOI: 10.18778/1733-8069.17.4.05.
71. Ślęzak, Izabela. 2019. Praca nad zaufaniem. Etyczne, praktyczne i metodologiczne wyzwania w relacjach badacz–badani na przykładzie etnografii agencji towarzyskich. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, 14, 1: 138–162. DOI: 10.18778/1733-8069.14.1.07.
72. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1988. Can the subaltern speak?. In: C. Nelson, L. Grossberg, eds. Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 271–313.
73. Stacey, Judith. 1991. Can there be a feminist ethnography? In: S.B. Gluck, D. Patai, eds. Women’s Words: The Feminist Practice of Oral History. London: Routledge, 111–120.
74. Thunberg, Sara, Linda Arnell. 2021. Pioneering the use of technologies in qualitative research – A research review of the use of digital interviews. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 25, 6: 757–768. DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2021.1935565.
75. Toldi, Nicole L. 2021. Job applicants favor video interviewing in the candidate-selection process. Employment Relations Today, 38: 19–27. DOI: 10.1002/ert.20351.
76. Tristram, Hoole, Hooley Marriott, Jane Wellens. 2012. “Introduction.” What is Online Research?: Using the Internet for Social Science Research. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 1–6. The ‚What is?’ Research Methods Series. Bloomsbury Collections. DOI: 10.1002/ert.20351.
77. Walentynowicz-Moryl, Katarzyna. 2017. Indywidualny wywiad online – technika asynchroniczna. Relacje. Studia z nauk społecznych, 3: 55–65. http://cejsh.icm.edu.pl/cejsh/element/bwmeta1.element.desklight-512db671-6292-4d81-b375-4d400ee50b87.
78. Weller, Susie. 2015. The potentials and pitfalls of using Skype for qualitative (longitudinal) interviews. NCRM Working Paper, Southampton, England: National Centre for Research Methods. https://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/id/eprint/3757. Dostęp: 12.10.2022.
79. Wolf, Diane L. 1996. Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork. Oxford: Westview Press.
80. Wyka, Anna. 1993. Badacz społeczny wobec doświadczenia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Aneta Ostaszewska
1
ORCID: ORCID
Marta Pietrusińska
2
ORCID: ORCID
  1. WSNSiR, Uniwersytet Warszawski
  2. Wydział Pedagogiczny, Wydział Socjologii, Uniwersytet Warszawski

Pandemia a... spiżarnia. Praktyki zaopatrzenia w żywność w dobie pandemii w perspektywie badań jakościowych

Agnieszka Maj
Studia Socjologiczne | 2023 | No 3 | 109-133 | DOI: 10.24425/sts.2023.147163
Keywords żywność zapasy życie codzienne pandemia COVID-19 zaopatrzenie w żywność
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Artykuł, oparty na wynikach analiz wywiadów pogłębionych przeprowadzonych w lipcu 2022 roku z wybraną grupą mieszkańców Polski, jest próbą odpowiedzi na pytanie, czy doświadczenia okresu pandemii miały wpływ na obecne sposoby zaopatrywania się badanych w żywność, np. kupowanie żywności, zarządzanie zapasami żywności, sposób organizacji spiżarni. Wymienione czynności analizowane są jako praktyki społeczne, element praktyk jedzeniowych. Jak pokazuje analiza wywiadów, część badanych dokonała rewizji dotychczasowych sposobów zaopatrzenia w żywność (ograniczenie konsumpcji żywności, dostosowanie jej do bieżących potrzeb, zwrócenie uwagi na jej niektóre moralno-etyczne aspekty). Część badanych po pandemii deklaruje też chęć posiadania zapasów żywności na wypadek niespodziewanej sytuacji, np. choroby. Ze zdobytych w czasie pandemii doświadczeń badani korzystają obecnie, aby radzić sobie ze skutkami inflacji.
Go to article

Bibliography

1. Aday, Serpil, Mehmet Seckin Aday. 2020. The Impact of Covid-19 on the food supply chain. Food Quality and Safety, 4: 167–180. DOI:10.1093/fqsafe/fyaa024, https://academic.oup.com/fqs/article/4/4/167/5896496.
2. Ananda, Jayanath, Gamithri Gayana Karunasena, David Pearson. 2023. Has the COVID-19 pandemic changed household food management and food waste behavior? A natural experiment using propensity score matching. Journal of Environmental Management, 328: 116887. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116887.
3. Babbitt, Callie W., Gregory A. Babbitt, Jessica M. Oehman. 2021. Behavioral impacts on residential food provisioning, use, and waste during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28: 315–325. DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.012.
4. Bakalis, Serafim, Vasilis P. Valdramidis, Dimitros Argyropoulos, Lilia Ahrne, Jianshe Chen, P. J. Cullen, Enda Cummins, Ashim K. Datta, Christos Emmanouilidis, Tim Foster, Peter J. Fryer, Ourania Gouseti, Amuldena Hospido, Kai Knoerzer, Alain LeBail, Alejandro P. Marangoni, Pingfan Rao, Oliver K. Schlüter, Petros Taoukis, Epameinondas Xanathakis, Jan F.M. VanImpe. 2020. How COVID-19 changed our food systems and food security paradigms. Current Research in Food Science, 3: 167–172. DOI: 10.1016/j.crfs.2020.05.003.
5. Bednarczuk, Aleksandra, Jerzy Śleszyński. 2019. Marnotrawstwo żywności w Polsce. Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Tom 19 (XXXIV), 4: 19–30. DOI: 10.22630/PRS.2019.19.4.53.
6. Ben Hassen, Tarek, Hamid El Bilali, Mohammad S. Allahyari, Sinissa Berjan, Oksana Fotina. 2021. Food purchase and eating behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey of Russian adults. Appetite, 165, 105309. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105309.
7. Berger, Peter L., Luckmann Thomas. 1983. Społeczne tworzenie rzeczywistości. Przekład Józef Niżnik. Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy.
8. Bogunia-Borowska, Małgorzata. 2021. Doświadczenie zmiany w czasie pandemii. Perspektywa fenomenologiczna. W: W. Gumuła, red. Dzienniki stanu pandemii. Czytane z perspektywy socjologii codzienności. Kraków: Instytut Literatury i Wydawnictwo Nomos, 205–223.
9. Bracale, Renata, Vaccaro Concetta M. 2020. Changes in food choice following restrictive measures due to COVID-19. Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases 30: 1423–1426. DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2020.05.027.
10. Caplan, Gerard. 1964. Principles of preventive psychiatry. New York: Basic Books.
11. Castilhos, Rodrigo B., Marcello Jacques Fonseca, Vera Bavaresco. 2017. Consumption, crisis, and coping strategies of lowerclass families in Brazil: A sociological account. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41, 4: 379–388. DOI: 10.1111/ijcs.12341.
12. Cranfield, John A. L. 2020. Framing Consumer Food Demand Responses in a Viral Pandemic. Canadian Journal of Agriculture and Economics, 68: 151–156. DOI: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cjag.12246.
13. Definicja pojęcia lockdown, Wielki Słownik Języka Polskiego, wersja online: https://wsjp.pl/haslo/podglad/103148/lockdown, dostęp: 19.04.2023.
14. Długosz, Piotr. 2021. Trauma pandemii COVID-19 w polskim społeczeństwie. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo CeDeWu.
15. Dopierała, Renata. 2022. Simplifying Life During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia Sociologica, 82: 15–30. DOI: 10.18778/0208-600X.82.02.
16. FAO Policy Brief nr 2, czerwiec 2006. https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/faoitaly/documents/pdf/pdf_Food_Security_Cocept_Note.pdf , dostęp: 23.09.2022.
17. Flick, Uwe. 2012. Projektowanie badania jakościowego. Przekład Paweł Tomanek. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
18. Forno, Francesca, Mikko Laamanen, Stefan Wahlen. 2022. (Un-)sustainable transformations: everyday food practices in Italy during COVID-19. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, T.18, 1: 201–214. DOI: 10.1080/15487733.2022.2037341.
19. Gawęcki, Jan, red. 2022. Żywienie człowieka: podstawy nauki o żywieniu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
20. Glinka, Beata, Wojciech Czakon. 2021. Podstawy badań jakościowych. Warszawa: Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.
21. Grochowicz, Marek. 2020. Sytuacja branży gastronomicznej w pierwszych miesiącach trwania pandemii COVID-19 na przykładzie Krakowa. Urban Development Issues, 67: 5–16. DOI: 10.2478/udi-2020-0029.
22. Informacja prasowa zamieszczona w portalu branży spożywczej „Hurt i detal” z dnia 25. 10. 2021 https://hurtidetal.pl/article/art_id,34504-107/jak-zmienily-sie-zwyczaje-zakupowepolakow-po-lockdownach/, dostęp: 25.09.2022.
23. Informacja prasowa o wynikach badań na stronie Business Insider z dnia 23 marca 2020 roku, pt. „Makaron, mąka i papier toaletowy. Jak Polacy robią zapasy”, https://businessinsider.com.pl/finanse/handel/koronawirus-w-polsce-zakupy-izapasy-wedlug-forum-konsumentow/mfz4dvz , dostęp: 7.12.2022.
24. Informacja prasowa zamieszczona na stronie internetowej Strefabiznesu.pl. https://strefabiznesu.pl/bezpieczne-zakupy-2020-handlowcy-powszechnie-nakazuja-klientom-robienie-zakupow-w-maseczkach-a-co-z-rekawiczkami-9092020/ar/c3-15169968, dostęp: 1.05.2023.
25. Informacja prasowa zamieszczona na stronie internetowej Money.pl na temat paniki zakupowej i produktów, na które zaobserwowano wzmożony popyt tuż po ogłoszeniu stanu epidemii w Polsce:https://www.money.pl/gospodarka/rok-z-koronawirusemdopiero-teraz-widac-jak-sprzedawcy-podnosili-ceny-6614419548134048a.html, dostęp:19.04.2023.
26. Informacja dotycząca zasad kwarantanny, serwis internetowy Ministerstwa Zdrowia i Narodowego Funduszu Zdrowia: https://pacjent.gov.pl/aktualnosc/krotsza-kwarantanna, dostęp: 30.04.2023.
27. Janssen, Meike, Betty P. I. Chang, Hristo Hristov, Igor Pravst, Adriano Profeta, Jeremy Millard. 2021. Changes in Food Consumption During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Analysis of Consumer Survey Data From the First Lockdown Period in Denmark, Germany, and Slovenia. Frontiers in Nutrition. t. 8–2021. DOI=10.3389/fnut.2021.635859.
28. Kaufmann, Jean-Claude. 2004. Ego. Socjologia jednostki: inna wizja człowieka i konstrukcji podmiotu. Przekład Krzysztof Wakar. Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.
29. Kopczyńska, Ewa. 2021. Jedzenie i inne rzeczy. Kraków: Wydawnictwo UJ.
30. Krajewski, Marek. 2009. Dzisiaj jak wczoraj, jutro jak dziś. Codzienność, przedmioty i reżimy podtrzymujące. W: M. Bogunia-Borowska, red. Barwy codzienności: analiza socjologiczna. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
31. Kvale, Steinar. 2004. Wprowadzenie do jakościowego wywiadu badawczego. Przekład Stanisław Zabielski. Białystok: Wydawnictwo Trans-Humana.
32. Maj, Agnieszka 2023. Kulinarne strategie i praktyki czasu pandemii – sposoby radzenia sobie z niepewnością. Kultura i Społeczeństwo, 67(2), 81–103. DOI: 10.35757/KiS.2023.67.2.4.
33. Malec, Krzysztof. 2021. Pandemia w świetle teorii kryzysu. W: W. Gumuła, red. Dzienniki stanu pandemii. Czytane z perspektywy socjologii codzienności. Kraków: Instytut Literatury i Wydawnictwo Nomos.
34. Mateja-Jaworska, Bogumiła, Marta Zawodna-Stephan. 2019. Badania życia codziennego w Polsce: Rozmowy (nie) codzienne. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
35. Miles, Matthew, B., Michael A. Huberman. 2000. Analiza danych jakościowych. Przekład Stanisław Zabielski. Białystok: Wydawnictwo Trans Humana.
36. Mniszewski, Maciej. 2021. Konsumpcja w pandemii. K. Dębkowska, M. Kolano, P. Śliwowski. Polski Instytut Ekonomiczny, Warszawa, maj 2021, https://pie.net.pl/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/PIE-Konsumpcja-w-pandemii.pdf, dostęp: 7.11.2022.
37. Narodowe Centrum Edukacji Żywieniowej, https://ncez.pzh.gov.pl/abc-zywienia/zasady-zdrowego-zywienia/jak-planowac-rozsadne-zakupy-spozywcze-orazzdrowe-posilki-w-okresie-pandemii-koronowirusa/, dostęp: 3.03.2023.
38. Olcoń-Kubicka, Marta, Joanna Felczak, Łukasz Posłuszny, Paweł Kubicki. 2021. Przemiany praktyk konsumpcyjnych w gospodarstwach domowych w pierwszych miesiącach pandemii COVID-19. W: K. Andrejuk, I. Grabowska, M. Olcoń-Kubicka, I. Taranowicz, red. Zmiana społeczna, pandemia, kryzys. Konteksty empiryczne i teoretyczne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN, 287–312.
39. Qian, Kun, Firouzeh Javadi, Michikazu Hiramatsu. 2020. Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Household Food Behaviour in Japan. Sustainability, 12(23), 9942. DOI: 10.3390/su12239942.
40. Raport Deliotte Global State of Consumer Tracker, https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/retail-distribution/consumer-behavior-trends-state-of-theconsumer-tracker.html, dostęp: 14.11.2022.
41. Raport KPMG: „Czy pandemia COVID-19 trwale zmieni zwyczaje zakupowe Polaków?”, https://home.kpmg/pl/pl/home/media/press-releases/2020/09/media-press-czy-pandemia-covid-19-trwale-zmieni-zwyczaje-zakupowe-polakow.html, dostęp: 15.02.2023.
42. Raport KPMG: Raport KPMG: „Nowa rzeczywistość: konsument w dobie COVID-19” https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/pl/pdf/2020/09/pl-Raport-KPMG-Nowarzeczywistosc-konsument-w-dobie-COVID-19.pdf, dostęp: 15.02.2023.
43. Raport Mc Kinsey „Jak zmienił się rynek zakupów spożywczych w pandemii?”. https://www.mckinsey.com/pl/our-insights/state-of-grocery-retail, dostęp:15.02.2023.
44. Raport CBOS „Jak Polacy radzą sobie z inflacją?” (nr 138/2022), https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2022/K_138_22.PDF, dostęp: 14.03.2023.
45. Raport: „Życie codzienne w czasach pandemii. Raport z drugiego etapu badań. Wersja pełna”. Wydział Socjologii Uniwersytet Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu. https://socjologia.amu.edu.pl/images/pliki/Zycie_codzienne_w_czasach_pandemii._Raport_z_drugiego_etapu_badan_wersja_pe%C5%82na.pdf, dostęp: 14.02.2023.
46. Raport Eurofund 2020 – Living, working and COVID-19, https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_publication/field_ef_document/ef20059en.pdf, dostęp: 13.03.2023.
47. Reckwitz, Andreas. 2002. Toward a Theory of Social Practice: A Development in Cultural Theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5, 2: 243–263.
48. Rodríguez-Pérez, Celia, Esther Molina-Montes, Vito Verardo, Reyes Artacho, Belen Garcia-Villanova, Eduardo Jesus Guerra-Hernendez, Maria Dolores Ruiz-Lopez. 2020. Changes in Dietary Behaviours during the COVID-19 Outbreak Confinement in the Spanish COVIDiet Study. Nutrients, 6: 1730. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/12/6/1730/htm.
49. Romeo-Arroyo, Elena, Maria Mora, Laura Vázquez-Araújo. 2020. Consumer behawior in confinement times: Food choice and cooking attitudes in Spain. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, Tom 21. 100226. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgfs.2020.100226.
50. Rozporządzenie Rady Ministrów z dnia 14 października 2020, wprowadzające tzw. „godziny dla seniorów”: https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20200001797, dostęp: 19.04.2023.
51. Rudziński, Roman. 1978. Jaspers. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Wiedza Powszechna.
52. Schatzki, Theodore. 2002. The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. Penn State University Press.
53. Schmidt, Filip. 2010. Teorie kuchenne: dialektyka przyzwyczajeń i refleksyjności w koncepcji Jean-Claude’a Kaufmanna. Kultura i Społeczeństwo, 1: 49–85.
54. Taranowicz, Iwona. 2022. Niecodzienna codzienność/codzienna niecodzienność. Życie codzienne w warunkach ryzyka. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Sociologica, nr 82: 5–13. DOI: 10.18778/0208-600X.82.01.
55. Wróblewska-Jachna, Joanna, red. 2021. Obraz pandemii COVID-19 w zapisach podmiotowej świadomości. Zakład Wydawniczy NOMOS.


Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Agnieszka Maj
1
  1. Wydział Socjologii i Pedagogiki, Katedra Socjologii, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego

Zanim nadeszła nuda. Dynamika odbioru treści kulturalnych w czasie pandemii

Antoni Głowacki Rafał Wiśniewski
Studia Socjologiczne | 2023 | No 3 | 81-107 | DOI: 10.24425/sts.2023.147162
Keywords cyfryzacja socjologia kultury COVID-19 konsumpcja kultury teorie praktyk
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

W trakcie pandemii COVID-19 funkcjonowanie instytucji kultury było znacząco ograniczone. Spowodowało to zmiany wzorów uczestnictwa w kulturze, z których najbardziej emblematycznym było przeniesienie aktywności kulturalnej do internetu. Artykuł przedstawia analizę praktyk odbiorców wydarzeń kulturalnych i ich postaw dotyczących konwersji cyfrowej (w odniesieniu do aktywności mających być w założeniu odpowiednikami wydarzeń stacjonarnych). Analiza przeprowadzona została z perspektywy teorii praktyk. Prezentowana perspektywa pozwala zrozumieć źródła atrakcyjności praktyk pandemicznych oraz logikę dynamiki odbioru treści kulturalnych obserwowaną w okresie pandemii. Bazą empiryczną analizy jest materiał z dwunastu zogniskowanych wywiadów grupowych (FGI) przeprowadzonych w listopadzie 2021 roku z przedstawicielami publiczności (osobami regularnie uczestniczącymi w wydarzeniach kulturalnych przed pandemią oraz w wydarzeniach online w trakcie pandemii).
Go to article

Bibliography

1. Bachórz, Agata, Karolina Ciechorska-Kulesza, Martyna Grabowska, Jakub Knera, Lesław Michałowski, Krzysztof Stachura, Stanisław Szultka, Cezary Obracht-Prondzyński, Piotr Zbieranek. 2016. Kulturalna hierarchia. Nowe dystynkcje i powinności w kulturze a stratyfikacja społeczna. Gdańsk: Instytut Kultury Miejskiej.
2. Bone, Jessica K., Hei Wan Mak, Jill K. Sonke, Meg E. Fluharty, Jenny B. Lee, Anthony J. Kolenic, Heidi Radunovich, Randy Cohen, Daisy Fancourt. 2022. Who Engaged in Home-Based Arts Activities During the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Data From 4,731 Adults in the United States. Health Promotion Practice. DOI: 10.1177/15248399221119806. Dostęp 06.03.2021.
3. Botti, Simona. 2000. What Role for Marketing in the Arts? An Analysis of Arts Consumption and Artistic Value. International Journal of Arts Management, 2, 3: 14–27.
4. Brieber, David, Marcos Nadal, Helmut Leder. 2015. In the White Cube: Museum Context Enhances the Valuation and Memory of Art. Acta Psychologica, 154: 36–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.11.004.
5. Cebula, Michał. 2022. Inequality in social capital: assessing the importance of structural factors and cultural consumption for social advantage. A case from Poland. International Review of Sociology, 32, 3: 501–528. DOI: 10.1080/03906701.2022.2135190.
6. Chajbos, Katarzyna, Bartek Lis. 2020. Przyszłość kultury. Badanie poznańskiego sektora kultury. Poznań: Centrum Praktyk Edukacyjnych w Centrum Kultury Zamek.
7. Cohen, Anthony P. 2023. Symboliczne konstruowanie wspólnoty. Przekład Konrad Siekierski. Warszawa: Narodowe Centrum Kultury.
8. Couldry, Nick. 2010. Theorising Media as Practice. In: B. Bräuchler, J. Postill, eds. Theorising Media and Practice. New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books, 35–54.
9. Czarnecki, Sławomir, Maciej Dzierżanowski, Martyna Grabowska, Jakub Knera, Lesław Michałowski, Cezary Olbracht-Prondzyński, Krzysztof Stachura, Stanisław Szultka, Piotr Zbieranek. 2012. P oszerzenie pola kultury. Diagnoza potencjału sektora kultury w Gdańsku. Gdańsk: Instytut Kultury Miejskiej.
10. Ćwikła, Małgorzata. 2021. Budowanie relacji z publicznością w internecie. Netnografia działalności polskich teatrów w czasie pandemii. Zarządzanie Mediami, 9, 2: 339–353.
11. Domański, Henryk, Dariusz Przybysz, Katarzyna M. Wyrzykowska, Kinga Zawadzka. 2021. Dystynkcje muzyczne: stratyfikacja społeczna i gusty muzyczne Polaków. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
12. Dulsrud, Arne, Bendik Bygstad. 2022. Digital Ecosystems as Social Institutions: Exploring the Role of Consumption through Four Research Streams of Digital Ecosystems. Consumption and Society, 1, 1: 99–119. DOI: 10.1332/QUPH6141.
13. Eichhorn, Kate. 2022. Content. Cambridge, Massachusettes: The MIT Press.
14. Fancourt, Daisy, Saoirse Finn. 2019. What is the evidence on the role of the arts in improving health and well-being? A scoping review. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
15. Feliksiak, Michał. 2021. Korzystanie z internetu. Warszawa: Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej.
16. Feliksiak, Michał. 2023. Aktywności i doświadczenia Polaków w 2022 roku. Warszawa: Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej.
17. Frick, Ulrich, Miles Tallon, Karina Gotthardt, Matthias Seitz, Katrin Rakoczy. 2021. Cultural withdrawal during COVID-19 lockdown: Impact in a sample of 828 artists and recipients of highbrow culture in Germany. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. DOI: 10.1037/aca0000389. Dostęp 06.03.2023.
18. Gajda, Kinga Anna, Bożena Gierat-Bieroń. 2021. Procesy transformacyjno-reorganizacyjne w sektorze kultury jako odpowiedź na kryzys pandemiczny COVID-19. W: A. Konior, O. Kosińska, A. Pluszyńska, red. Badania w sektorze kultury: przyszłość i zmiana. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Attyka, 155–186.
19. Hirschman, Elizabeth C., Morris B. Holbrook. 1982. Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46, 3: 92–101. DOI: 10.1177/002224298204600314.
20. Jeannotte, M. Sharon. 2021. When the Gigs Are Gone: Valuing Arts, Culture and Media in the COVID-19 Pandemic. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3, 1. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100097. Dostęp 06.03.2023.
21. Jęcz, Jan. 2022. Prawda ekranu. O praktyce screenshotowania. Przegląd Kulturoznawczy, 1, 51: 53–73. DOI: 10.4467/20843860PK.22.004.15749.
22. Jurkiewicz, Jarosław. 2022. Wpływ ograniczeń sanitarnych COVID-19 na funkcjonowanie instytucji kultury w Polsce. Acta Politica Polonica, 53: 89–100. DOI: 10.18276/ap.2022.53-07.
23. Kantar. 2020. Wave 1 results for Poland and the key markets around the world.
24. Komańda, Marcin. 2022. Was It Doomsday? First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on the Polish Cultural Industry. Economics and Culture, 19, 1: 98–107. DOI: 10.2478/jec-2022-0009.
25. Krygowska-Nowak, Natalia, Joanna Skrzyńska, Agata Zadrożna. 2022. Uczestnictwo w wydarzeniach kulturalnych online w trakcie pandemii. Raport z badania jakościowego. Warszawa: Narodowe Centrum Kultury. https://www.nck.pl/badania/raporty/uczestnictwo-w-kulturze-online. Dostęp 06.03.2023.
26. Lewicki, Mikołaj, Mirosław Filiciak. 2017. Wynalezienie poszerzonego pola kultury. Kultura i Rozwój, 1, 2: 7–32. DOI: 10.7366/KIR.2017.1.2.01.
27. Mica, Adriana. 2018. Sociology as Analysis of the Unintended: From the Problem of Ignorance to the Discovery of the Possible. Abingdon. New York, NY: Routledge.
28. Mica, Adriana, Mikołaj Pawlak, Anna Horolets, Paweł Kubicki, red. 2023. Routledge International Handbook of Failure. London: Routledge.
29. Myrczik, Eva, Riie Heikkilä, Nete Nørgaard Kristensen, Semi Purhonen. 2022. Missing out on culture—or not: Danes and Finns’ cultural participation, the pandemic, and cultural policy measures. Nordisk kulturpolitisk tidsskrift, 25, 2: 1–24. DOI: 10.18261/nkt.25.2.4.
30. Narodowe Centrum Kultury. 2022. Zmiany w obszarze aktywności kulturalnych podczas ograniczeń epidemicznych. Komunikat z badania Narodowego Centrum Kultury. https://www.nck.pl/badania/aktualnosci/trzecia-edycja-sondazu-o-kulturze-w-pandemii. Dostęp 06.03.2023.
31. Nicolini, Davide. 2012. Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Postill, John. 2010. Introduction: Theorising Media and Practice. In: B. Bräuchler, J. Postill, eds. Theorising Media and Practice. New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books, 1–32.
33. Radermecker, Anne-Sophie V. 2020. Art and Culture in the COVID-19 Era: For a Consumer-Oriented Approach. SN Business & Economics, 1, 4. DOI: 10.1007/s43546-020-00003-y. Dostęp 06.03.2023.
34. Radzińska, Jowita, Paula Pustułka. 2021. A Win for the Middle Class? A Qualitative Study Mapping “Benefits” from the National Quarantine. Kultura i Społeczeństwo, 65, 1: 43–63. DOI: 10.35757/KiS.2021.65.1.1.
35. Reckwitz, Andreas. 2002. Toward a Theory of Social Practices. A Development in Culturalist Theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5, 2: 243–63.
36. Rocznik kultury polskiej 2020. 2021. Warszawa: Narodowe Centrum Kultury.
37. Rozporządzenie Rady Ministrów z dnia 31 marca 2020 r. w sprawie ustanowienia określonych ograniczeń, nakazów i zakazów w związku z wystąpieniem stanu epidemii. https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20200000566. Dostęp 04.04.2023.
38. Rozporządzenie Rady Ministrów z dnia 19 czerwca 2020 r. w sprawie ustanowienia określonych ograniczeń, nakazów i zakazów w związku z wystąpieniem stanu epidemii. https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20200001066. Dostęp 04.04.2023.
39. Rozporządzenie Rady Ministrów z dnia 9 października 2020 r. w sprawie ustanowienia określonych ograniczeń, nakazów i zakazów w związku z wystąpieniem stanu epidemii. https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20200001758. Dostęp 04.04.2023.
40. Rozporządzenie Rady Ministrów z dnia 6 maja 2021 r. w sprawie ustanowienia określonych ograniczeń, nakazów i zakazów w związku z wystąpieniem stanu epidemii. https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20210000861. Dostęp 04.04.2023.
41. Rozporządzenie Rady Ministrów z dnia 25 lutego 2021 r. w sprawie ustanowienia określonych ograniczeń, nakazów i zakazów w związku z wystąpieniem stanu epidemii. https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20220000473. Dostęp 04.04.2023.
42. Schatzki, Theodore R. 1996. Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge University Press.
43. Schatzki, Theodore R. 2001. Introduction: Practice Theory. In: K. K. Cetina, T. R. Schatzki, E. von Savigny, eds. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London and New York: Routledge, 10–23.
44. Shove, Elizabeth, Mika Pantzar, Matt Watson. 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How It Changes. Los Angeles: SAGE.
45. Sikorska, Małgorzata. 2018. Teorie praktyk jako alternatywa dla badań nad rodziną prowadzonych w Polsce. Studia Socjologiczne, 2, 229: 31–63. DOI: 10.24425/122463.
46. Southerton, Dale. 2013. Habits, Routines and Temporalities of Consumption: From Individual Behaviours to the Reproduction of Everyday Practices. Time & Society, 22, 3: 335–55. DOI: 10.1177/0961463X12464228.
47. Spaargaren, Gert, Don Weenink, Machiel Lamers, red. 2016. Practice Theory and Research: Exploring the Dynamics of Social Life. London, New York: Routledge.
48. Szlendak, Tomasz, Krzysztof Olechnicki. 2017. Nowe praktyki kulturowe Polaków: megaceremoniały i subświaty. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
49. Warde, Alan. 2005. Consumption and Theories of Practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 5, 2: 131–53. DOI: 10.1177/1469540505053090.
50. Warde, Alan. 2014. After taste: Culture, consumption and theories of practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 14, 3: 279–303. DOI: 10.1177/1469540514547828.
51. Weenink, Don, Gert Spaargaren. 2016. Emotional Agency Navigates a World of Practices. In: G. Spaargaren, D. Weenink, M. Lamers, eds. Practice theory and research: exploring the dynamics of social life. London, New York: Routledge, 60–84.
52. Welch, Daniel, Bente Halkier, Margit Keller. 2020. Introduction to the Special Issue: Renewing Theories of Practice and Reappraising the Cultural. Cultural Sociology, 14, 4: 325–39. DOI: 10.1177/1749975520954146.
53. Wiśniewski, Rafał. 2020. „Kompas ustawiony na kulturę”. Rzeczpospolita, maj 14.
54. Wiśniewski, Rafał, Tomasz Kukołowicz. 2017. Pięć kierunków poszerzania pola kultury, czyli uwagi o współczesnej polityce kulturalnej. W: C. Obracht-Prondzyński, P. Zbieranek, red. Pomorskie poszerzenie pola kultury: dylematy, konteksty, działania. Gdańsk: Nadbałtyckie Centrum Kultury, 93–120.



Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Antoni Głowacki
1
ORCID: ORCID
Rafał Wiśniewski
2
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Narodowe Centrum Kultury; Wydział Socjologii, Uniwersytet Warszawski
  2. Narodowe Centrum Kultury; Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego

Parlamentarne ćwierkanie o pandemii. Analiza sentymentu tweetów parlamentarzystów publikowanych podczas pierwszych 12 miesięcy pandemii koronawirusa w Polsce

Andrzej Meler
Studia Socjologiczne | 2022 | No 2 | 113-136 | DOI: 10.24425/sts.2022.141425
Keywords komunikacja polityczna Covid-19 Twitter analiza sentymentu populizm
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

W czasie pandemii koronawirusa istotnym zagadnieniem stało się zarządzanie kryzysem, a w nim – zarządzanie społecznymi emocjami. Przedstawiona w artykule analiza sentymentu oparta na słowniku NAWL dotyczy postów polskich parlamentarzystów zamieszczanych na Twitterze podczas pierwszych 12 miesięcy pandemii. Pozwala ona określić w sposób ilościowy zakres uwagi poświęcony pandemii w tym medium społecznościowym w relacji do innych tematów. Umożliwia także zidentyfikowanie istotnych różnic pomiędzy sentymentem postów publikowanych przez parlamentarzystów obozu rządzącego i opozycji, postów na temat pandemii i na inne tematy.
Go to article

Bibliography

1. Afeltowicz, Łukasz, Michał Wróblewski. 2021. Socjologia epidemii. Wyłaniające się choroby zakaźne w perspektywie nauk społecznych. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika. DOI: 10.12775/978-83-231-4563-9
2. Alekseev, Alexander. 2021. “It Is in the Nation-State that Democracy Resides”. How the Populist Radical Right Discursively Manipulates the Concept of Democracy in the EU Parliamentary Elections. Journal of Language and Politics. DOI: 10.1075/jlp.20022.ale.
3. Alfarrarjeh, Abdullah, Sumeet Agrawal, Seon Ho Kim, Cyrus Shahabi. 2017. GeoSpatial Multimedia Sentiment Analysis in Disasters. 2017 International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA): 193–202. DOI: 10.1109/ DSAA.2017.77.
4. Banerjee, Romita et al. 2018. Tweet Emotion Mapping: Understanding US Emotions in Time and Space. 2018 IEEE Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Engineering (AIKE): 93–100. DOI: 10.1109/AIKE.2018.00021.
5. Beckett, Charlie, Mark Deuze. 2016. On the Role of Emotion in the Future of Journalism. Social Media and Society, 2, 3: 1–6. DOI: 10.1177/2056305116662395.
6. Bidwell, Kelly, Katherine Casey, Rachel Glennerster. 2020. Debates: Voting and Expenditure Responses to Political Communication. Journal of Political Economy, 128, 8: 1–22. DOI: 10.1086/706862.
7. Bill, Stanley, Ben Stanley. 2020. Whose Poland Is It to Be? PiS and the Struggle between Monism and Pluralism. East European Politics, 36, 3: 378–394. DOI: 10.1080/21599165.2020.1787161.
8. Bracciale, Roberta, Antonio Martella, Chiara Visentin. 2018. From Super-Participants to Super-Echoed: Participation in the 2018 Italian Electoral Twittersphere. Partecipazione e Conflitto, 11, 2: 361–393. DOI: 10.1285/i20356609v11i2p361.
9. Breeze, Ruth. 2019. Emotion in Politics: Affective-Discursive Practices in UKIP and Labour. Discourse and Society, 30, 1: 24–43. DOI: 10.1177/0957926518801074.
10. Chen, Yepeng, Yang Zhu, Yuxian Jiang. 2021. Effects of Admiration of Others on Social Media Fatigue: Loneliness and Anxiety as Mediators. Social Behavior and Personality, 49, 6: 1–10. DOI: 10.2224/sbp.10058.
11. Crooks, Andrew, Arie Croitoru, Anthony Stefanidis, Jacek Radzikowski. 2013. #Earthquake: Twitter as a Distributed Sensor System. Transactions in GIS, 17, 1: 124–147. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2012.01359.x.
12. Demertzis, Nicolas. 2020. The political sociology of emotions. New York: Routledge.
13. Duncan-Jones, Austin. 1945. Ethics and Language. by Charles L. Stevenson. Mind, 54, 216: 362–373. DOI: 10.1086/286884.
14. Ferrara, Emilio, Zeyao Yang. 2015. Measuring Emotional Contagion in Social Media. PLoS ONE, 10, 11: e0142390. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142390.
15. Glücker, Hartmut, Manuel Burghardt, Christian Wolff. 2014. Sentilyzer – A Mashup Application for the Sentiment Analysis of Facebook Pages. Workshop proceedings of the 12th edition of the KONVENS conference: 58–61. http://www.unihildesheim.de/konvens2014/data/konvens2014-workshop-proceedings.pdf.
16. Heaney, Jonathan G. 2019. Emotionas Power: Capitaland Strategyinthe Fieldof Politics. Journal of Political Power, 12, 2: 224–244. DOI: 10.1080/2158379X.2019.1618485.
17. Interactive Analysis of the NAWL Database. https://exp.lobi.nencki.gov.pl/nawl-analysis. Dostęp: 30.12.2020.
18. Johansson, Elena, Jacek Nożewski. 2018. Polish and Swedish Journalist-Politician Twitter Networks: Who Are the Gatekeepers? Central European Journal of Communication, 11, 2: 129–150. DOI: 10.19195/1899-5101.11.2(21).2.
19. Kasprowicz, Dominika. 2017. Populistyczna radykalna prawica jako obszar badawczy. Kraków: Instytut Dziennikarstwa, Mediów i Komunikacji Społecznej UJ.
20. Kazlauskaite, Ruta, Mikko Salmela. 2022. Mediated Emotions: Shame and Pride in Polish Right-Wing Media Coverage of the 2019 European Parliament Elections. Innovation – The European Journal of Social Science Research, 35: 130–149. DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2021.1952551.
21. Klein, Naomi. 2008. Doktryna szoku. Jak współczesny kapitalizm wykorzystuje klęski żywiołowe i kryzysy społeczne. Przekład Hanna Jankowska i in. Warszawa: Warszawskie Wydawnictwo Literackie Muza.
22. Konarski, Wawrzyniec. 2013. Polityka i politycy w Polsce – analiza krytyczna. Studia Politologiczne, 27: 259–275.
23. Krawczyk-Antońska, Żaneta. 2013. Pobudzić a zostać pobudzonym. Emocje w polityce. Katowice: Oficyna Wydawnicza Wacław Walasek.
24. Lindquist, Kristen A., Jennifer K. MacCormack, Holly Shablack. 2015. The Role of Language in Emotion: Predictions from Psychological Constructionism. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, MAR: 1–17. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00444.
25. Liu, Zhe et al. 2018. Seemo: A Computational Approach to See Emotions. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: Association Computing Machinery, 1–12. DOI: 10.1145/3173574.3173938.
26. Luhmann, Niklas. 2007. Systemy społeczne: zarys ogólnej teorii. Przekład Michał Kaczmarczyk. Kraków: Zakład Wydawniczy „Nomos”.
27. Matuchniak-Krasuska, Anna. 2015. Koncepcja habitusu u Pierre’a Bourdieu. Internetowy Magazyn Filozoficzny Hybris, 31, 4: 77–111.
28. Meler, Andrzej, Radosław Sojak, Beata Królicka. 2020. Młode wilki, wojowniczki i samowykluczeni. Wzory komunikacji medialnej posłów VIII kadencji. W: J. Arcimowicz, K. Gadowska, red. Sfera publiczna w Polsce i jej współczesne konteksty. Warszawa: Instytut Spraw Publicznych, 351–373. https://www.isp.org.pl/pl/publikacje/sfera-publiczna-w-polsce-i-jej-wspolczesne-konteksty.
29. Munezero, Myriam, Calkin Suero Montero, Erkki Sutinen, John Pajunen. 2014. Are They Different? Affect, Feeling, Emotion, Sentiment, and Opinion Detection in Text. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 5, 2: 101–111.
30. Nguyen, Vu Dung, Blesson Varghese, Adam Barker. 2013. The Royal Birth of 2013: Analysing and Visualising Public Sentiment in the UK Using Twitter. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Big Data: 46–54. DOI: 10.1109/BigData.2013.6691669.
31. Parmelee, John H. 2013. Political Journalists and Twitter: Influences on Norms and Practices. Journal of Media Practice, 14, 4: 291–305. DOI: 10.1386/jmpr.14.4.291_1.
32. Parmelee, John H. 2014. The Agenda-Building Function of Political Tweets. New Media and Society, 16, 3: 434–450. DOI: 10.1177/1461444813487955.
33. Pawłowski, Marek. 2013. Demokracja medialna. Refleksje. Pismo naukowe studentów i doktorantów WNPiD UAM, 8: 133. DOI: 10.14746/r.2013.2.12.
34. Pingle, Mark, Jason Lim. 2021. Guilt, Love, and the Behavioral Enrichment of Public Choice Theory. Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, 5, 2: 87–93.
35. Rico, Guillem, Marc Guinjoan, Eva Anduiza. 2017. The Emotional Underpinnings of Populism: How Anger and Fear Affect Populist Attitudes. Swiss Political Science Review, 23, 4: 444–461. DOI: 10.1111/spsr.12261.
36. Riegel, Monika et al. 2015. Nencki Affective Word List (NAWL): The Cultural Adaptation of the Berlin Affective Word List–Reloaded (BAWL-R) for Polish. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 4: 1222–1236. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-014-0552-1.
37. Sailunaz, Kashfia, Reda Alhajj. 2019. Emotion and Sentiment Analysis from Twitter Text. Journal of Computational Science, 36: 101003. DOI: 10.1016/j. jocs.2019.05.009.
38. Sartre, Jean-Paul. 2006. Szkic o teorii emocji. Przekład Rafał Abramciów. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
39. Shapiro, Michael A., Robert H. Rieger. 1992. Comparing Positive and Negative Political Advertising on Radio. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 1: 135–145. DOI: 10.1177/107769909206900111.
40. Sieradzka-Baziur, Bożena. 2020. Uwarunkowania kształcenia zdalnego w rodzinie w dobie COVID-19. Horyzonty Wychowania, 19, 51: 89–99. DOI: 10.35765/hw.1979.
41. Singer, Jane B. 2005. The political j-blogger: “Normalizing” a New Media Form to Fit Old Norms and Practices. Journalism, 6, 2: 173–198. DOI: 10.1177/1464884905051009.
42. Sinnenberg, Lauren et al. 2017. Twitter as a Tool for Health Research: A Systematic Review. American Journal of Public Health, 107, 1: 1–8. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303512.
43. Siza, Remo. 2020. In the Midst of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Economic Insecurity and Coping Strategies of Italian Households. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 42, 3/4: 298–312. DOI: 10.1108/IJSSP-07-2020-0326.
44. Solomon, Robert. 1995. A Passion for Justice: Emotions and the Origins of the Social Contract. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
45. Spelman, Elisabeth V. 1989. Anger and Insubordination. In: A. Garry, M. Pearsall, eds. Women, knowledge, and reality: explorations in feminist philosophy. Boston: Unwin, 263–273.
46. Spinczyk, Dominik et al. 2020. Computer-Aided Therapeutic Diagnosis for Anorexia. BioMedical Engineering Online, 19, 1: 1–23. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-020-00798-9.
47. Stevenson, Charles Leslie. 1938. Persuasive Definitions. Mind, 47, 187: 331–350. DOI: 10.1093/mind/XLVII.187.331.
48. Stevenson, Charles Leslie. 1944. Ethics and Language. New Haven: Yale University Press.
49. Szymaniak, Kinga, Marcin Zajenkowski. 2021. How Do High Trait Anger People Feel about Rewards High and Low in Arousal? Disentangling the Association between Trait Anger and Subjective Pleasantness of Rewards. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, March 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110278.
50. Tarullo, Raquel. 2020. Emotive and Positive Political Communication on Facebook: The Case of Argentinean Leaders. Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 22, 1: 31–53. DOI: 10.21018/rjcpr.2020.1.286.
51. Tw. 2021. TikTok ma w Polsce więcej użytkowników niż Twitter, Pinterest przed Snapchatem i Wykopem (TOP10). https://www.wirtualnemedia.pl/artykul/tiktok-ma-w-polsce-wiecej-uzytkownikow-niz-twitter-pinterest-przed-snapchatem-i-wykopem-top10. Dostęp: 14.11.2021.
52. Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin. 2018. Media Coverage of Shifting Emotional Regimes: Donald Trump’s Angry Populism. Media, Culture and Society, 40, 5: 766–778. DOI: 10.1177/0163443718772190.
53. Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin. 2019. Questioning the Ideal of the Public Sphere: The Emotional Turn. Social Media and Society, 5, 3: 1–3. DOI: 10.1177/2056305119852175.
54. Weeden, Kim, Benjamin Cornwell, Barum Park. 2021. Still a Small World? University Course Enrollment Networks before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sociological Science, 8: 73–82. DOI: 10.15195/v8.a4.
55. Widacki, Jan, red. 2017. Populizm penalny. Kraków: Krakowska Akademia im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego.
56. Widmann, Tobias. 2021. How Emotional Are Populists Really? Factors Explaining Emotional Appeals in the Communication of Political Parties. Political Psychology, 42, 1: 163–181. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12693.
57. Wierzba, Małgorzata et al. 2015. Basic Emotions in the Nencki Affective Word List (NAWL BE): New Method of Classifying Emotional Stimuli. PLoS ONE, 10, 7: 1–16. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132305.
58. Wilkin, Jerzy, red. 2005. Teoria wyboru publicznego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
59. Wodak, Ruth, Salomi Boukala. 2015. European Identities and the Revival of Nationalism in the European Union. A Discourse Historical Approach. Journal of Language and Politics, 14, 1: 87–109. DOI: 10.1075/jlp.14.1.05wod.
60. Wojcik, Stefan, Adam Hughes. 2019. Sizing Up Twitter Users. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/04/24/sizing-up-twitter-users/. Dostęp: 28.02.2021.
61. Wróblewski, Michał, Andrzej Meler, Łukasz Afeltowicz. 2020. Raport: Ryzyko, zaufanie, choroby zakaźne. Polki i Polacy o pandemii. Toruń. https://repozytorium.umk.pl/bitstream/handle/item/6434/UMK_pandemia.pdf?sequence=3.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Andrzej Meler
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu

Granice wytrzymałości, czyli teatr w pandemii

Maria Babicka Justyna Czarnota-Misztal
ACADEMIA. Magazyn Polskiej Akademii Nauk | 2021 | Nr 2 (66) Granice | 54-59 | DOI: 10.24425/academiaPAN.2021.137536
Keywords teatr "Nowe formy istnienia" badania socjologiczne pandemia COVID-19
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Badania polskiego teatru w czasie pandemii mogą nas wiele nauczyć. Z jednej strony obnażyły szkodliwe praktyki w zatrudnianiu artystów. Z drugiej dały szansę na prawdziwie równy dostęp do teatru. O tych zagadnieniach opowiadają Maria Babicka i Justyna Czarnota-Misztal.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Maria Babicka
Justyna Czarnota-Misztal

Kroniki pandemii lata 2020-2021

Jerzy Duszyński Aneta Afelt Małgorzata Kossowska Anna Ochab-Marcinek Radosław Owczuk Wojciech Paczos Anna Plater-Zyberk Krzysztof Pyrć Magdalena Rosińska Andrzej Rychard Tomasz Smiatacz
ACADEMIA. Magazyn Polskiej Akademii Nauk | 2021 | Nr 4 (68) Kroniki pandemii lata 2020-2021 | 1-118
Keywords pandemia COVID-19 pandemia a rozwój nauki mechanizm powstawania chorób zakaźnych cykle sezonowe chorób zakaźnych drogi zakażenia patogeneza szczepienia ochronne psychologiczne skutki COVID-19 społeczne skutki COVID-19 gospodarcze skutki COVID-19 koinfekcje
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Kroniki pandemii to zbiór 27 stanowisk opublikowanych przez interdyscyplinarny Zespół doradczy ds. COVID-19 przy Prezesie Polskiej Akademii Nauk, działający od lipca 2020 roku. Jest to już drugie po Zrozumieć COVID-19 obszerniejsze opracowanie naszego zespołu porządkujące wiadomości dotyczące wirusa SARS-CoV-2 i powodowanej przez niego choroby COVID-19. Wydane we wrześniu 2020 roku Zrozumieć COVID-19 miało na celu podsumowanie przebiegu pierwszych miesięcy pandemii i przygotowanie społeczeństwa w Polsce do ciężkiego sezonu jesienno-zimowego 2020/2021. Niniejsze opracowanie powstaje po dwóch latach trwania pandemii, która rozpoczęła się w Wuhan w grudniu 2019 roku. Mamy nadzieję, że dzięki na bieżąco tworzonym tekstom raportującym przebieg pandemii i dylematy, przed którymi stawało społeczeństwo, w przypadku kolejnych podobnych wyzwań skorzystamy z tych trudnych i ważnych doświadczeń.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jerzy Duszyński
Aneta Afelt
Małgorzata Kossowska
Anna Ochab-Marcinek
Radosław Owczuk
Wojciech Paczos
Anna Plater-Zyberk
Krzysztof Pyrć
Magdalena Rosińska
Andrzej Rychard
Tomasz Smiatacz

Socioeconomic precariousness in times of COVID-19: A human rights quandary under the ECHR

Sarah Ganty
Polish Yearbook of International Law | 2020 | No XL | 151-177 | DOI: 10.24425/pyil.2021.138434
Keywords COVID-19 discrimination intersectionality poverty stereotypes
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic, and pandemics in general, affect socioeconomically disadvantaged people more severely. This is due not only to their precarious living, health, and working conditions, but also to public actions and omissions. However, their plight remains mostly invisible to the public, governments, and legislators, which raises many questions regarding respect of their fundamental rights. In this contribution, I explore these questions in light of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). On the basis of the corpus of literature in the field and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) case law, I show that the Strasbourg Court has developed some protection for people in a precarious situation, especially under the prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment and the right to private and family life. This case law is likely to be relevant to the protection of socioeconomically underprivileged people during pandemics. However, this protection is limited and imbued with pitfalls. Against this background, I show that there is an urgent need for practitioners and courts to explore an additional tool under the ECHR: the prohibition of discrimination on grounds of socioeconomic status. This tool can be used to tackle issues of misrecognition which particularly affect socioeconomically underprivileged people, who are more severely affected by public actions and omissions in the context of the current pandemic.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Sarah Ganty
1 2 3 4
ORCID: ORCID
  1. J.S.D. candidate, Yale Law School (USA)
  2. FWO Postdoctoral Fellow, Ghent University (Belgium)
  3. Visiting Professor, Central European University (Austria)
  4. Facultés Universitaires Saint-Louis–Bruxelles (Belgium)

Family Functioning and Psychological Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Coping Strategies during Covid-19 Lockdown in Pakistan

Sheharyar Ahmad Lubna Nasreen Sumaya Batool Shazia Khalid
Polish Psychological Bulletin | 2021 | vol. 52 | No 2 | 162-171 | DOI: 10.24425/ppb.2021.137259
Keywords family functioning psychological well-being coping COVID-19 lockdown
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This study was designed to explore the relationship between family functioning, coping strategies, and psychological well-being (PWB). It is hypothesized that coping strategies would mediate the relationship between family functioning and PWB. Data were collected from participants during lockdown (N = 224) including male (n=97) and female (n=127) by using a convenient sampling technique. Family functioning, Coping strategies, and PWB were measured using the ICPS Family Functioning Scale, Cope Inventory, and Flourishing Scale, respectively. The Pearson product-moment correlation analysis indicated a significant relationship among family functions sub-scales, coping strategies sub-scales, and PWB. The results suggested a mediating role of active coping between subscales of family functioning and psychological well-being.
Go to article

Bibliography

Ahmad, S., Nasreen, L. & Aiman, M., (2020). Shyness and psychological well-being as predictors of problematic internet use among students in Pakistan. Psicología, Conocimiento y Sociedad, 10(3), 7-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.26864/PCS.v10.n3.1
Alradhawi, M., Shubber, N., Sheppard, J., & Ali, Y., (2020). Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental well-being amongst individuals in society: A review. International Journal of Surgery, 78, 147–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.070
Aqeel, M., Shuja, K., H., Abbas, J., Rehna, T., & Ziapour, A., (2020). The influence of illness perception, anxiety and depression disorders on students mental health during Covid-19 outbreak in Pakistan: a webbased cross-sectional survey. Health Economics & Outcomes Research. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-30128/v1
Baron, R., M., & Kenny, D., A., (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514 .51.6.1173
Barry, R., Lawrence, E., & Langer, A., (2008). Conceptualization and assessment of disengagement in romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 15(3), 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2008.00200.x
Cohen, S., (2004). Social relationships and health. American Psychologist, 59, 676–684. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.8.676
Carver, C., S., (2013). COPE Inventory. Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. Retrieved from https://www.midss.org/sites/default/files/cope.pdf
Carver, C., S., Scheier, M., F., & Weintraub, J., K., (1989). Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.56.2.267
Dakin, D., (2020, April 3). Quality time, structure important for famil- ies during COVID-19 pandemic. Retrieved from https://medicalx- press.com/news/2020-04-quality-important-families-covid-pandemic.html
Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R., (2009). New measures of well-being: Flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 39, 247-266. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481- 2354-4-12
Dijkstra, M., T., M., & Homan, A., C., (2016). Engaging in rather than disengaging from stress: Effective coping and perceived control. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01415
Domènech Rodriguez, M., M., Donovick, M., R., & Crowley, S., L., (2009). Parenting styles in a cultural context: Observations of “protective parenting” in first‐generation Latinos. Family process, 48(2), 195- 210
Ensign, J., Scherman, A., & Clark, J., J., (1998). The relationship of family structure and conflict to levels of intimacy and parental attachement in college students, Adolescence, 33(131), 575
Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J., T., (2004). Coping pitfall and promise. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 74-745. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141456
Francisco, R., Loios, S., & Pedro, M., (2015). Family functioning and adolescent psychological maladjustment: The mediating role of coping strategies. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 47(5), 759–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-015-0609-0
Gonzales, F., A., Hurtado-de-Mendoza, A., Santoyo-Olsson, J., & Nápoles, A., M., (2015). Do coping strategies mediate the effects of emotional support on emotional well-being among Spanish-speaking Latina breast cancer survivors? Psycho-Oncology, 25(11), 1286–1292. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3953
Goyal, K., Chauhan, P., Chhikara, K., Gupta, P., & Singh, M., P., (2020). Fear of COVID 2019: First suicidal case in India. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 49, 101989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2020.101989
Hayes, A., F., (2013). The PROCESS macro for SPSS and SAS (version 2.13)[Software]
Ho, C., S., Chee, C., Y., & Ho, R., C., (2020). Mental health strategies to combat the psychological impact of COVID-19 beyond paranoia and panic. Annals Academy of Medicine Singapore, 49(1). http://www.annals.edu.sg/pdf/special/COM20043_HoCSH_2.pdf
Huang, Y., & Zhao, N., (2020). Generalized anxiety disorder, depressive symptoms and sleep quality during COVID-19 outbreak in China: a web-based cross-sectional survey. Psychiatry Research, 288, 112954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112954
Kheradmand, M., & Ghahhari, S., (2018). The relationship of parenting stress and parenting styles with coping strategies in adolescents: The role of modulators of emotion regulation and mindfulness. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, In Press. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpbs.12108
Krok, D., (2015). The role of meaning in life within the relations of religious coping and psychological well-being. Journal of Religion and Health, 54(6), 2292–2308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-014-9983-3
Leonard, R., & Alison, L., (1999). Critical incident stress debriefing and its effects on coping strategies and anger in a sample of Australian police officers involved in shooting incidents. Work & Stress, 13(2), 144-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/026783799296110
Li, W., Yang, Y., Liu, Z., H., Zhao, Y., J., Zhang, Q., Zhang, L., … Xiang, Y., T., (2020). Progression of mental health services during the COVID-19 outbreak in China. International Journal of Biological Sciences, 16(10), 1732–1738. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.45120
Litman, J., A., (2006). The COPE inventory: Dimensionality and relationships with approach-and avoidance-motives and positive and negative traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(2), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.032
Loukzadeh, Z & Bafrooi, N., M., (2013). Association of coping style and psychological well-being in hospital nurses. Journal of Caring Science, 2(4), 313-319. https://dx.doi.org/10.5681%2Fjcs.2013.037
Martin, S., Calabrese, S., K., Wolters, P., L., Walker, K., A., Warren, K., & Hazra, R., (2011). Family functioning and coping styles in families of children with Cancer and HIV disease. Clinical Pediatrics, 51(1), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922811417300
Muhonen, T., & Torkelson, E., (2011). Exploring coping effectiveness and optimism among municipal employees. Psychology, 2(6), 584– 589. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2011.26090
Nahlen, B., C., Bjorling, G., Elfstrom, M., L., Persson, H., & Saboonchi, F., (2015). Assessment of coping strategies and their associations with health related quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure: The brief cope restructured. Cardiology Research, 6(2), 239– 248. https://doi.org/10.14740/cr385w
Ng, D., M., & Jeffery, R., W., (2003). Relationships between perceived stress and health behaviors in a sample of working adults. Health Psychology, 22, 638–642. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.22.6.638
Noller, P., Seth-Smith, M., Bouma, R. & Schweitzer, R., (1992). Parent and adolescent perceptions of family functioning: A comparison of clinic and nonclinic families. Journal of Adolescence, 15, 101-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-1971(92)90041-3
Pearlin, L., I., Bierman, A., Aneshensel, C., & Phelan, J., (1999). Handbook of the sociology of mental health. Kluwer Academic/ Plenum
Pollina, L., K., & Snell Jr, W., E., (1999). Coping in intimate relationships: Development of the multidimensional intimate coping questionnaire. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16(1), 133-144.
Reblin, M., & Uchino, B., N., (2008). Social and emotional support and its implication for health. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 21(2), 201.
Reczek, C., Thomeer, M., B., Lodge, A., C., Umberson, D., & Underhill, M., (2014). Diet and exercise in parenthood: A social control perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 1047–1062.
Reis, H., & Franks, P., (1994). The role of intimacy and social suport in health outcomes: Two processes or one? Personal Relationships, 1 (2), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1994.tb00061.x
Ren, Y., Lin, M., P., Liu, Y., H., Zhang, X., Wu, J., Y. W., Hu, W., H., … You, J., (2018). The mediating role of coping strategy in the association between family functioning and nonsuicidal self-injury among Taiwanese adolescents. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 74(7), 1246–1257.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22587 Sagone, E., & Elvira-De-Caroli, M., (2014). A correlational study on dispositional resilience, psychological well-being, and coping strategies in university students. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(7), 463–471. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-2-7-5
Scabini, E., & Manzi, C., (2011b). Family processes and identity. Handbook of Identity Theory and Research, 565–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_23
Schotanus-Dijkstra, M., Klooster, P., M., Drossaert, C., H., C., Pieterse, M., E., Bolier, L., Walburg, J., A., & Bohlmeijer, E., T., (2016). Validation of the flourishing scale in a sample of people with suboptimal levels of mental well-being. BMC Psychology, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-016-0116-5
Sanavi, S., F., Baghbanian, A., Shovey, M., F., & Ansari-Moghaddam, A., (2013). A study on family communication pattern and parenting styles with quality of life in adolescent. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 63(11), 1393–1398. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/24392526/
Stanisławski, K., (2019). The coping circumplex model: An integrative model of the structure of coping with stress. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00694
Tarantino, N., Lamis, D., A., Ballard, E., D., Masuda, A., & Dvorak, R., D., (2015). Parent–child conflict and drug use in college women: A moderated mediation model of self-control and mindfulness. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62(2), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000013s
Thomas, P., A., Liu, H., & Umberson, D., (2017). Family relationships and well-being. Innovation in Aging, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igx025
Yi, Y., Lagniton, P., N., P., Ye, S., Li, E., & Xu, R., H., (2020). COVID- 19: what has been learned and to be learned about the novel coronavirus disease. International Journal of Biological Sciences, 16(10), 1753–1766. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.45134
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Sheharyar Ahmad
1
Lubna Nasreen
2
Sumaya Batool
3
Shazia Khalid
4
  1. Beaconhouse National University
  2. University of Punjab
  3. University of Sargodha
  4. Preston University Kohat, Islamabad Campus

The relationship between Trait Emotional Intelligence and emotion recognition in the context of COVID-19 pandemic

Marco Cannavò Nadia Barberis Rosalba Larcan Francesca Cuzzocrea
Polish Psychological Bulletin | 2022 | vol. 53 | No 1 | 15-22 | DOI: 10.24425/ppb.2022.140477
Keywords COVID-19 Trait EI emotion recognition
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Covid-19 pandemic is severely impacting worldwide. A line of research warned that facial occlusion may impair facial emotion recognition, whilst prior research highlighted the role of Trait Emotional Intelligence in the recognition of non-verbal social stimuli. The sample consisted of 102 emerging adults, aged 18-24 (M = 20.76; SD = 2.10; 84% females, 16% males) and were asked to recognize four different emotions (happiness, fear, anger, and sadness) in fully visible faces and in faces wearing a mask and to complete a questionnaire assessing Trait Emotional Intelligence. Results highlighted that individuals displayed lower accuracy in detecting happiness and fear in covered faces, while also being more inaccurate in reporting correct answers. The results show that subjects provide more correct answers when the photos show people without a mask than when they are wearing it. In addition, participants give more wrong answers when there are subjects wearing masks in the photos than when they are not wearing it. In addition, participants provide more correct answers regarding happiness and sadness when in the photos the subjects are not wearing the mask, compared to when they are wearing it. Implications are discussed.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marco Cannavò
1
ORCID: ORCID
Nadia Barberis
1
ORCID: ORCID
Rosalba Larcan
2
ORCID: ORCID
Francesca Cuzzocrea
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Università degli studi Magna Graecia Catanzaro, Italy
  2. Università degli studi di Messina, Messina, Italy

Evaluation of Noise Pollution in Bengaluru City, India During COVID-19 Pandemic

Saima Anjum Anupma Kumari
Archives of Acoustics | 2022 | vol. 47 | No 2 | 131-140 | DOI: 10.24425/aoa.2022.141644
Keywords noise pollution Bengaluru COVID-19 pandemic
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Most of the Indian cities and towns have been facing serious traffic noise pollution due to urbanization, substantial growth of new vehicles, inadequate road network, etc. Automotive traffic, railroads, and air traffic are the most common sources of noise pollution in cities, with vehicular traffic accounting for around 55% of overall metropolitan noise. Prolonged exposure to such loud noise causes anger, stress, mental diseases, discomfort, hypertension, concentration problems, and sleeplessness. This study aims to investigate the effects of COVID-19 societal lockdown on changes in the noise pollution levels before, during, and after the lockdown period in various industrial, commercial, residential, and silence zones in Bengaluru, India, in light of the recent imposition of COVID-19 societal lockdown. According to data acquired from the KSPCB (Karnataka State Pollution Control Board) online portal, the average noise levels before and during lockdown were determined to be in the range of 59.4 dB to 70.9 dB and 58.2 dB to 62.7 dB for different zones. During the lockdown, all commercial, industrial and educational activities were closed to limit the spread of infection, resulting in usage of private and commercial transportation declining dramatically. Reduction in the noise level was observed during the lockdown in all monitoring stations of Bengaluru, except for Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health, where the noise level didn’t decline because of a COVID emergency. Maximum reduction was observed in the commercial area (11.56%) followed by industrial areas (8.34%). The result further indicated that only the industrial area experienced an increase of 8.41% in noise level, while other areas experienced a reduction in a noise level during the early post-lockdown. During the mid and late post-lockdown periods, most locations experienced a rapid spike in the noise intensity.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Saima Anjum
1
Anupma Kumari
1
  1. Environmental Biology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Patna University, Patna, India

Influence of State of Alarm Caused by COVID-19 on Noise in the City Centre of Huelva (Spain)

Juan Carlos Fortes Rafael Sánchez-Sánchez Juan Pedro Bolívar
Archives of Acoustics | 2022 | vol. 47 | No 2 | 285-291 | DOI: 10.24425/aoa.2022.141657
Keywords COVID-19 noise States of Alarm traffic
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic the government of Spain decreed the State of Alarm to confine the entire population at their homes, except for essential services. Therefore, the central objective of this study is to evaluate the implication of this situation for the environmental noise existing in the city of Huelva (Spain). This study demonstrates that during the state of alarm an average daily reduction of 3.4 dBA was noted, and in the central moments of the day these reductions reached up to 4.4 dBA, while from 10:00 to 12:00 pm the reduction was around 6.5 dBA. Nevertheless, there were two moments of day: 3:00 am (garbage collection, street cleaning and container disinfection), and 8:00 pm (daily applause for health professionals), when the noise during the pandemic was higher than before it. It is further shown that globally, the loudest events only decreased by about 3 dBA, while the global background noise decreased by 10 dBA during the alarm state. Regarding road traffic noise, it is verified that in addition to being reduced by about 4 dBA, traffic represents 6.7% of noisy events during the alarm state, while before it represented 13%.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Juan Carlos Fortes
1
Rafael Sánchez-Sánchez
1
Juan Pedro Bolívar
2
  1. School of Engineering, University of Huelva, Huelva, Spain
  2. Faculty of Experimental Sciences, University of Huelva, Huelva, Spain

Economic Security Faces Challenges

Katarzyna Żukrowska
ACADEMIA. The magazine of the Polish Academy of Sciences | 2023 | No 1 (77) Security | 66-69 | DOI: 10.24425/academiaPAS.2023.146582
Keywords economic security COVID-19 pandemic international cooperation
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

For a considerable period of time, we lived under conditions in which we paid little heed to the state of our security in its various aspects: military, economic, social, or health-related.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Katarzyna Żukrowska
1
  1. Warsaw School of Economics

Recycling and household waste insight: the impact after four successive waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. Study in Guelma city, North-East of Algeria

Amina Mesbahi-Salhi Mohamed Kaizouri Bachir El Mouaz Madoui Wafa Rezaiguia Zihad Bouslama
Archives of Environmental Protection | 2023 | vol. 49 | No 1 | 103-109 | DOI: 10.24425/aep.2023.144743
Keywords COVID-19 Household waste management landfill recycling
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has wreaked havoc especially in 2020 and the first half of 2021 and has left severe after-effects affecting not only the health sector but also all aspects of human life. The aim of this study is to inspect the current trends of the quantities of household waste produced during the first four waves of the pandemic. The study was carried out in Guelma city, northeastern of Algeria, where the first containment was registered on February 25, 2020, it concerns an Italian national (Mohamed et al. 2021). An increase in the production of household waste of approximately 14% during the first containment was recorded in the study area, with the interruption of recycling, which caused an enormous pressure on the technical landfill center of Guelma. The results showed that the trend of waste production decreased at the following averages: 205.80; 198.92; 196.69 and 192.43 tons, for the first four waves of COVID-19 respectively. Therefore, a return to the pre-pandemic state would be close, which dampens the impact and pressure on the landfill and the environment. This research allows for perceiving the waste management status in Algeria, between the pandemic and post-pandemic period.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Acter, T., Uddin, N., Das, J., Akhter, A., Choudhury, T.R. & Kim, S. (2020). Evolution of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: A global health emergency. Science of The Total Environment, 730, 138996. DOI:10.1016/j. scitotenv.2020.138996
  2. Adyel, T.M. (2020). Accumulation of plastic waste during COVID-19. Science, 369(6509), pp. 1314–1315. DOI:10.1126/science. abd9925
  3. AND (2020). Report on the State of Waste Management in Algeria https://and.dz/site/wp-content/uploads/rapport%20DMA2.pdf (Assessed 03 july 2022).
  4. Anderson, R.M., Heesterbeek, H., Klinkenberg, D. & Hollingsworth, T.D. (2020). How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? The Lancet, 395(10228), pp. 931–934. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30567-5
  5. Andi (2020). National Agency for the Development of Investments (Andi). The borough of Guelma. Volumes 1–19. Presentation of the wilaya (borough) 2015. Assessed on Sep 09, 2020. http:// www.andi.dz/PDF/monographies/Guelma.pdf. Journal of Environmental Engineering.
  6. Aouissi, H.A., Kechebar, M.S.A., Ababsa, M., Roufayel, R., Neji, B., Petrisor, A.-I. Ohmagari, N. (2022). The Importance of Behavioral and Native Factors on COVID-19 Infection and Severity: Insights from a Preliminary Cross-Sectional Study. Healthcare, 10(7), 1341. DOI:10.3390/healthcare10071341
  7. Boroujeni, M., Saberian, M. & Li, J. (2021). Environmental impacts of COVID-19 on Victoria, Australia, witnessed two waves of Coronavirus. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(11), pp. 14182–14191. DOI:10.1007/s11356-021-12556-y
  8. Chen, D.M.-C., Bodirsky, B.L., Krueger, T., Mishra, A. & Popp, A. (2020). The world’s growing municipal solid waste: trends and impacts. Environmental Research Letters, 15(7), 074021. DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/ab8659
  9. Chen, Q., Liang, M., Li, Y., Guo, J., Fei, D., Wang, L.& Li, X. (2020). Mental health care for medical staff in China during the COVID-19 outbreak. The Lancet Psychiatry, 7(4), e15-e16. DOI:10.1016/ S2215-0366(20)30078-X
  10. Chen, W., Zhang, N., Wei, J., Yen, H.-L. & Li, Y. (2020). Short- -range airborne route dominates exposure of respiratory infection during close contact. Building and Environment, 176, 106859. DOI:10.1101/2020.03.16.20037291
  11. Contributors, V. (2021). Economic Crisis and Mentality of Youth in Post-Pandemic Period edited by Sagar Simlandy: PS Opus Publications.
  12. DGPPS, M. (2020). Plan de préparation et de riposte à la menace de l’infection coronavirus Covid-19. Disponible sur: http://www. sante. gov. dz/images/Prevention/cornavirus/Plan-de-prparation. PDF.
  13. Ebner, N. & Iacovidou, E. (2021). The challenges of Covid-19 pandemic on improving plastic waste recycling rates. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, pp. 726–735. DOI:10.1016/j. spc.2021.07.001
  14. Ghennam, N. (2020). Waste Recycling Business in Algeria – Opportunities and Challenges for SME. Al-Riyada Bus. Econ. J., 6, pp. 10–22.
  15. Hyun, M. (2020). Korea sees steep rise in online shopping during COVID-19 pandemic. ZD Net. Assessed on April 12, 2020. https://www.zdnet.com/article/justice-department-seizes-fakecovid- 19-vaccine-website-stealing-info-from-visitors/
  16. Iyer, M., Tiwari, S., Renu, K., Pasha, M. Y., Pandit, S., Singh, B. & Balasubramanian, V. (2021). Environmental survival of SARSCoV- 2 – a solid waste perspective. Environmental Research, 197, 111015. DOI:10.1016/j.envres.2021.111015
  17. Jribi, S., Ben Ismail, H., Doggui, D. & Debbabi, H. (2020). COVID-19 virus outbreak lockdown: What impacts on household food wastage? Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22(5). DOI:10668-020-00740-y
  18. Kampf, G., Todt, D., Pfaender, S. & Steinmann, E. (2020). Persistence of coronaviruses on inanimate surfaces and their inactivation with biocidal agents. Journal of Hospital Infection, 104(3), pp. 246–251. DOI:10.1016/j.jhin.2020.01.022
  19. Kandel, N., Chungong, S., Omaar, A. & Xing, J. (2020). Health security capacities in the context of COVID-19 outbreak: an analysis of International Health Regulations annual report data from 182 countries. The Lancet, 395(10229), pp. 1047–1053. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30553-5
  20. Kebaili, F. K., Baziz-Berkani, A., Aouissi, H.A., Mihai, F.-C., Houda, M., Ababsa, M. & Fürst, C. (2022). Characterization and Planning of Household Waste Management: A Case Study from the MENA Region. Sustainability, 14(9), 5461. DOI:10.3390/su14095461
  21. Klemeš, J.J., Van Fan, Y., Tan, R.R. & Jiang, P. (2020). Minimising the present and future plastic waste, energy and environmental footprints related to COVID-19. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 127, 109883. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2020.109883
  22. Leveau, C.M., Aouissi, H.A. & Kebaili, F.K. (2022). Spatial diffusion of COVID-19 in Algeria during the third wave. GeoJournal, 1–6. DOI:10.1007/s10708-022-10608-5
  23. Lounis, M., Rais, M.A., Bencherit, D., Aouissi, H.A., Oudjedi, A., Klugarová, J. & Riad, A. (2022). Side Effects of COVID-19 Inactivated Virus vs. Adenoviral Vector Vaccines: Experience of Algerian Healthcare Workers. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 896343-896343. DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.896343
  24. Low, D., & Koh, A. (2020). Singapore’s Food Delivery Surge during Lockdown Highlights Waste Problems. Bloomberg News, (Accessed 18 July2020).
  25. Mohamed, K., Amina, M.-S., Mouaz, M.B.E., Zihad, B. & Wafa, R. (2021). The impact of the coronavirus pandemic on the household waste flow during the containment period. Environmental Analysis Health and Toxicology, 36(2), e2021011. DOI:10.5620/ eaht.2021011
  26. Mol, M.P.G. & Caldas, S. (2020). Can the human coronavirus epidemic also spread through solid waste? Waste Management & Research, 38(5), pp. 485–486. DOI:10.1177/0734242X20918312
  27. Nzediegwu, C. & Chang, S. (2020). Developing Countries For Submission to: Resources Conservation y Recycling Type of Paper: Perspective. Resources, Conservation. Recycling, 104947.
  28. Paleologos, E.K., Elhakeem, M. & Amrousi, M.E. (2018). Bayesian analysis of air emission violations from waste incineration and coincineration plants. Risk Analysis, 38(11), pp. 2368–2378. DOI:10.1111/risa.13130
  29. Ranney, M.L., Griffeth, V. & Jha, A.K. (2020). Critical supply shortages – the need for ventilators and personal protective equipment during the Covid-19 pandemic. New England Journal of Medicine, 382(18), e41. DOI:10.1056/NEJMp2006141
  30. Remuzzi, A. & Remuzzi, G. (2020). COVID-19 and Italy: what next? The Lancet, 395(10231), pp. 1225–1228. DOI:10.1016/S0140- 6736(20)30627-9
  31. Roy, P., Mohanty, A.K., Wagner, A., Sharif, S., Khalil, H., & Misra, M. (2021). Impacts of COVID-19 outbreak on the municipal solid waste management: Now and beyond the pandemic. ACS Environmental Au, 1(1), pp. 32–45. DOI:10.1021/ acsenvironau.1c00005
  32. SNGID. (2019). National Waste Management Strategy https://www. nascrc.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/la-strat%C3%A9gienationale- pour-la-gestion- int%C3%A9gr%C3%A9e-desd% C3%A9chets-SNGID-2035-cas-des-POPs.pdf (accessed on 15 June 202)
  33. Van Fan, Y., Jiang, P., Hemzal, M. & Klemeš, J.J. (2021). An update of COVID-19 influence on waste management. Science of the Total Environment, 754, 142014. DOI:10.1016/j. scitotenv.2020.142014
  34. Vaverková, M.D., Paleologos, E.K., Dominijanni, A., Koda, E., Tang, C.S., Wdowska, M., Li, Q., Guarena, N., Abdel- Mohsen, O.M., Vieira, C.S., Manassero, M., O’Kelly, B.C., Xie, Q., Bo, MV., Adamcová, D.,. Podlasek, A., Anand, U.M., Arif, M., Venkata Siva Naga Sai Goli, Kuntikana, G., Palmeira, E.M., Pathak, S. & Singh, D.N. (2020). Municipal solid waste management under COVID-19: challenges and recommendations. Environmental Geotechnics, 8(3), pp. 217–232. DOI:10.1680/jenge.20.00082
  35. WHO (2020). COVID-19 2020 situation summary – updated 19 April 2020. Available at. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/ cases-updates/summary. html#covid19-pandemic (Accessed 20 june 2021 ).
  36. WHO (2022). The COVID-19 weekly epidemiological Update – updated 12 October 2022. Available. https://www.who.int/ publications/m/item/weekly-epidemiological-update-on-covid- 19-12-october-2022 (Accessed 18 /10/ 2022).
  37. World Health Organization. Worldmeter (2015). Worldmeter 2015. Available online: https:// www.worldometers.info/population/largest-cities-in-the-world/ (accessed on 12 March 2022).
  38. Yang, Y., Li, W., Zhang, Q., Zhang, L., Cheung, T. & Xiang, Y.-T. (2020). Mental health services for older adults in China during the COVID-19 outbreak. The Lancet Psychiatry, 7(4), e19. DOI:10.1016/S2215-0366 (20)30079-1
  39. Zandifar, A. & Badrfam, R. (2020). Iranian mental health during the COVID-19 epidemic. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 51. DOI:10.1016/j.ajp.2020.101
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Amina Mesbahi-Salhi
1
Mohamed Kaizouri
1
Bachir El Mouaz Madoui
1
Wafa Rezaiguia
2
ORCID: ORCID
Zihad Bouslama
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Laboratory of Ecology of Earth and Aquatic Systems, University of Badji Mokhtar,Annaba, 23052, Algeria
  2. University of Mohamed Cherif Messaadia, Souk-Ahras, 41043, Algeria

Spatial planning for reducing the epidemic risk – the state of knowledge and practice from the perspective of the COVID-19 pandemic

Paulina Perwenis Szymon Szewrański
Journal of Water and Land Development | 2022 | Special Issue | 56-69 | DOI: 10.24425/jwld.2022.143721
Keywords cities COVID-19 epidemic risk urban planning
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The ongoing public health crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the link between community safety and health and the urban environment and has raised many challenges for cities that want to continue to provide a safe living environment. The Coronavirus pandemic has provoked many controversy and questions about its impact on urban forms. The goal of research was to document the status of knowledge and emerging research paths in the year following the COVID pandemic’s disclosure. The study includes a scoping review to determine the relationship between urban planning and the epidemic risk. Literature research showed that compact structures, because of their proximity to health centers, give higher epidemic safety. Accessibility to vital services prepares cities and their residents for unanticipated threats. The promotion of a dispersion strategy, with social distance regulations already in place, can lead to the rise of prejudice and xenophobia. Urban planners and architects should also pay more attention to urban geometry, building configuration, communication networks, or green spaces. In order to strengthen urban resilience, appropriate infrastructure, the implementation of new technologies, and the construction of urban systems and structures are essential.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Paulina Perwenis
1
ORCID: ORCID
Szymon Szewrański
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Institute of Spatial Management, ul. Grunwaldzka 55, 50-357 Wrocław, Poland

Analyzing and improving tools for supporting fighting against COVID-19 based on prediction models and contact tracing

Martyna Gruda Michal Kedziora
Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences Technical Sciences | 2021 | 69 | 4 | e137414 | DOI: 10.24425/bpasts.2021.137414
Keywords COVID-19 prediction models contact tracing
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In the paper, we are analyzing and proposing an improvement to current tools and solutions for supporting fighting with COVID-19. We analyzed the most popular anti-covid tools and COVID prediction models. We addressed issues of secure data collection, prediction accuracy based on COVID models. What is most important, we proposed a solution for improving the prediction and contract tracing element in these applications. The proof of concept solution to support the fight against a global pandemic is presented, and the future possibilities for its development are discussed.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1.  V. Chamola, V. Hassija, V. Gupta, and M. Guizani, “A comprehensive review of the COVID-19 pandemic and the role of IoT, drones, AI, blockchain, and 5G in managing its impact,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 90225–90265, 2020.
  2.  J. Stanley and J.S. Granick, “Aclu white paper: The limits of location tracking in an epidemic,” Am. Civ. Lib. Union, April 2020.
  3.  G. Dartmann, H. Song, and A. Schmeink, Big data analytics for cyber-physical systems: machine learning for the internet of things. Elsevier, 2019.
  4.  M. Zastrow, “South korea is reporting intimate details of COVID-19 cases: has it helped?” Nature, March 2020.
  5.  Ł. Apiecionek, J. Czerniak, M. Romantowski, D. Ewald, B. Tsizh, H. Zarzycki, and W. Dobrosielski, “Authentication over internet protocol,” Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol. 68, no. 2, 2020.
  6.  E. Talhi, J.-C. Huet, V. Fortineau, and S. Lamouri, “A methodology for cloud manufacturing architecture in the context of Industry 4.0,” Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 271‒284, 2020.
  7.  L. Madeyski, T. Lewowski, and B. Kitchenham, “OECD Recommendation’s draft concerning access to research data from public funding: A review,” Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol. 69, no. 1, p. e135401, 2021.
  8.  A.I. Abubakar, K.G. Omeke, M. Öztürk, S. Hussain, and M.A. Imran, “The role of artificial intelligence driven 5G networks in COVID-19 outbreak: opportunities, challenges, and future outlook,” Front. Commun. Networks, vol. 1, p. 575065, 2020.
  9.  D. Ingram and J. Ward, “Behind the global efforts to make a privacy-first coronavirus tracking app,” NBC News, April 2020.
  10.  “Google API for exposure notifications,” [Online]. Available: https://developers.google.com/android/exposure-notifications. Accessed: 2020-11-06.
  11.  “COVID-19 screening tool website, apple website,” [Online]. Available: https://covid19.apple.com/screening/. Accessed: 2020-11-07.
  12.  “Center for disease control and prevention COVID-19 health bot website,” [Online]. Available: https://www.cdc.gov/code.html. Accessed: 2020-11-07.
  13.  “Project decode – data driven covid detection,” [Online]. Available: https://antycovid.ipipan.waw.pl/slides/p1130-3-Gruca.pdf. Accessed: 2020-11-07.
  14.  C. Menni, A. Valdes, and M. Freidin, “Real-time tracking of self-reported symptoms to predict potential COVID-19,” Nat. Med., April 2020.
  15.  D. Hauser, A.O. Obeng, K. Fei, M.A. Ramos, and C.R. Horowitz, “Views of primary care providers on testing patients for genetic risks for common chronic diseases,” Health Aff., vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 793–800, 2018.
  16.  T. Alashoor, S. Han, and R.C. Joseph, “Familiarity with big data, privacy concerns, and self-disclosure accuracy in social networking websites: an apco model,” Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., vol. 41, no. 1, p. 4, 2017.
  17.  M. Macenaite, “From universal towards child-specific protection of the right to privacy online: Dilemmas in the EU General Data Protection Regulation,” New Media Soc., vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 765–779, 2017.
  18.  N. Crepaz, T. Tang, G. Marks, M.J. Mugavero, L. Espinoza, and H.I. Hall, “Durable viral suppression and transmission risk potential among persons with diagnosed hiv infection: United states, 2012–2013,” Clin. Infect. Dis., vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 976– 983, 2016.
  19.  A.A. Hussain, O. Bouachir, F. Al-Turjman, and M. Aloqaily, “AI techniques for COVID-19,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 128776‒128795, 2020.
  20.  R. Vaishya, M. Javaid, I.H. Khan, and A. Haleem, “Artificial intelligence (AI) applications for COVID-19 pandemic,” Diabetes Metab. Syndr.: Clin. Res. Rev., 2020.
  21.  H. Dai and B. Zhao, “Association of the infection probability of COVID-19 with ventilation rates in confined spaces,” in Build. Simul., vol. 13. Springer, 2020, pp. 1321–1327.
  22.  J. Xie, Z. Tong, X. Guan, B. Du, H. Qiu, and A. S. Slutsky, “Critical care crisis and some recommendations during the COVID-19 epidemic in china,” Intensive Care Med., pp. 1‒4, 2020.
  23.  C. Prunean, “System and method for amplitude pre-distortion optimization for GPS signal constant envelope transmission,” Oct. 1 2019, US Patent 10,432,447.
  24.  P. Zhou, Y. Zheng, Z. Li, M. Li, and G. Shen, “IODetector: a generic service for indoor outdoor detection,” in Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems, ser. SenSys ’12. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2012, pp. 361–362. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/2426656.2426709.
  25.  J.A. Quiña-Mera, E.R. Saransig-Perugachi, D.J. Trejo- España, M.E. Naranjo-Toro, and C.P. Guevara-Vega, “Automation of the barter exchange management in ecuador applying Google V3 API for geolocation,” in International Conference on Information Technology & Systems. Springer, 2019, pp. 210‒219.
  26.  N. Ahmed, R.A. Michelin, W. Xue, S. Ruj, R. Malaney, S.S. Kanhere, A. Seneviratne, W. Hu, H. Janicke, and S.K. Jha, “A survey of COVID-19 contact tracing apps,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 134577–134601, 2020.
  27.  S. Jeschke, C. Brecher, H. Song, and D. Rawat, “Industrial internet of things: Foundations, principles and applications,” Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 1–715, 2017.
  28.  “Emf explained 2.0,” [Online]. Available: http://www.emfexplained.info/pol/?id=25916. Accessed: 2020-12-02.
  29.  Y. Sun, H. Song, A. J. Jara, and R. Bie, “Internet of things and big data analytics for smart and connected communities,” IEEE Access, vol. 4, pp. 766–773, 2016.
  30.  J. Zhang, E. Björnson, M. Matthaiou, D.W.K. Ng, H. Yang, and D.J. Love, “Prospective multiple antenna technologies for beyond 5G,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 1637–1660, 2020.
  31.  Y. Siriwardhana, C. De Alwis, G. Gür, M. Ylianttila, and M. Liyanage, “The fight against the COVID-19 pandemic with 5G technologies,” IEEE Eng. Manage. Rev., vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 72–84, 2020.
  32.  K. Shafique, B.A. Khawaja, F. Sabir, S. Qazi, and M. Mustaqim, “Internet of Things (IoT) for next-generation smart systems: A review of current challenges, future trends and prospects for emerging 5G-IoT scenarios,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 23022–23040, 2020.
  33.  M. Otoom, N. Otoum, M. A. Alzubaidi, Y. Etoom, and R. Banihani, “An iot-based framework for early identification and monitoring of COVID-19 cases,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 62, p. 102149, 2020.
  34.  S. Jaafari, A. Alhasani, S.M. Almutairi et al., “Certain investigations on iot system for COVID-19,” in 2020 International Conference on Computing and Information Technology (ICCIT- 1441). IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–4.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Martyna Gruda
1
Michal Kedziora
1
  1. Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, ul. Wybrzeże Stanisława Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more