Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 4
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The mathematical model of the globular eutectic solidification in 2D was designed. Proposed model is based on the Cellular Automaton Finite Differences (CA-FD) calculation method. Model has been used for studies of the primary austenite and of globular eutectic grains growth during the ductile iron solidification in the thin wall casting. Model takes into account, among other things, non-uniform temperature distribution in the casting wall cross-section, kinetics of the austenite and graphite grains nucleation, and non-equilibrium nature of the interphase boundary migration. Calculation of eutectic saturation influence (Sc = 0.9 - 1.1) on microstructure (austenite and graphite fraction, density of austenite and graphite grains) and temperature curves in 2 mm wall ductile iron casting has been done.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

A.A. Burbelko
M. Górny
D. Gurgul
W. Kapturkiewicz
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Developing novel methods, approaches and computational techniques is essential for solving efficiently more and more demanding up-to-date engineering problems. Designing durable, light and eco-friendly structures starts at the conceptual stage, where new efficient design and optimization tools need to be implemented. Nowadays, apart from the traditional gradient-based methods applied to optimal structural and material design, innovative techniques based on versatile heuristic concepts, like for example Cellular Automata, are implemented. Cellular Automata are built to represent mechanical systems where the special local update rules are implemented to mimic the performance of complex systems. This paper presents a novel concept of flexible Cellular Automata rules and their implementation into topology optimization process. Despite a few decades of development, topology optimization still remains one of the most important research fields within the area of structural and material design. One can notice novel ideas and formulations as well as new fields of their implementation. What stimulates that progress is that the researcher community continuously works on innovative and efficient topology optimization methods and algorithms. The proposed algorithm combined with an efficient analysis system ANSYS offers a fast convergence of the topology generation process and allows obtaining well-defined final topologies.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1.  M.P. Bendsoe, “Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem,” Struct. Optim., vol. 1, pp. 193–202, 1989.
  2.  O. Sigmund, “A 99 line topology optimization code written in MATLAB,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., vol. 21, pp. 120–127, 2001.
  3.  E. Andreassen, A. Clausen, M. Schvenels, B.S. Lazarov, and O. Sigmund, “Efficient topology optimization in Matlab using 88 lines of code,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., vol. 4, pp.  1–16, 2011.
  4.  K. Liu and A. Tovar, “An efficient 3D topology optimization code written in Matlab,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., vol.  50, pp. 1175–1196, 2014.
  5.  X.M. Xieand and G.P. Steven, Evolutionary Structural Optimization, Berlin: Springer, 1997.
  6.  Q.M. Querin, G.P. Steven, and Y.M. Xie, “Evolutionary structural optimization using a bi-directional algorithm,” Eng. Comput., vol. 15, pp. 1034–1048, 1998.
  7.  K. Nabaki, J. Shen, and X. Xuang, “Evolutionary topology optimization of continuum structures considering fatigue failure,” Mater. Des., vol. 166, pp.13, 2019.
  8.  C. Kane, F. Jouveand, and M. Schoenauer, “Structural topology optimization in linear and nonlinear elasticity using genetic algorithms” in Proc. 21st ASME Design Automatic Conference, 1995, pp.1‒8.
  9.  R. Balamurugan, C. Ramakrishnan, and N. Singh, “Performance evaluation of a two stage adaptive genetic algorithm in structural topology optimization,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 8, pp.  1607–1624, 2008.
  10.  H.S. Gebremedhen, D.E. Woldemichael, and F.M. Hashimi, “A firefly algorithm based hybrid method for structural topology optimization,” Adv. Model. Simul. Eng. Sci., vol. 7, no. 44, p. 20, 2020.
  11.  A.A. Jaafer, M. Al-Bazoon, and A.O. Dawood, “Structural topology design optimization using the binary bat algorithm,” Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 4, p. 1481, 2020.
  12.  D. Gaweł, M. Nowak, H. Hausa, and R. Roszak, “New biomimetic approach to the aircraft wing structural design based on aeroelastic analysis,” Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 741–750, 2017.
  13.  S.Y. Chang and S.K.Youn, “Material cloud method for topology optimization,” Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 65, pp.  1585–1607, 2006.
  14.  H.A. Eschenauer, V.V. Kobelevand, and A. Schumacher, “Bubble method for topology and shape optimization of structures,” Struct. Optim., vol. 8, pp. 42–51, 1993.
  15.  M.Y. Wang, X. Wang, and D. Guo, “A level set method for structural topology optimization,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 192, pp. 227–246, 2003.
  16.  P. Wei, Z. Li, X. Li, and M.Y. Wang, “An 88-line MATLAB code for the parameterized level set method based topology optimization using radial basis functions,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., vol. 58, pp. 831–849, 2018.
  17.  E. Biyikliand and A.C. To, “Proportional topology optimization: a new non-sensitivity method for solving stress constrained and minimum compliance problems and its implementation in Matlab,” PLoSONE, vol. 10, pp. 1–23, 2015.
  18.  Y. Xian and D.W. Rosen, “A new topology optimization approach based on Moving Morphable Components (MMC) and the ersatz material model,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., vol. 62, pp. 19–39, 2020.
  19.  B. Xing and W.J. Gao, Innovative computational intelligence: a rough guide to 134 clever algorithms, Switzerland: Springer, 2014.
  20.  T. Tarczewski, L.J. Niewiara, and L.M. Grzesiak, “Artificial bee colony based state feedback position controller for PMSM servo-drive–the efficiency analysis,” Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 997–1007, 2020.
  21.  Y. Li and X. Wang, “Improved dolphin swarm optimization algorithm based on information entropy,” Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 679–685, 2019.
  22.  A. Paszyńska, K. Jopek, M. Woźniak, and M. Paszyński, “Heuristic algorithm to predict the location of C 0 separators for efficient isogeometric analysis simulations with direct solvers,” Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 907–917, 2018.
  23.  J. Von Neumann, Theory of self-reproducing automata, Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press, 1966.
  24.  S. Ulam, “Random processes and transformations,” in Proc. International Congress of Mathematics, 1952, vol. 2, pp. 85–87.
  25.  B. Chopard and M. Droz, “Cellular automata model for the diffusion equation,” J. Stat. Phys., vol. 64, pp. 859–892, 1991.
  26.  J.P. Crutchfield and J.E. Hanson, “Turbulent pattern bases for cellular automata,” Physica D, vol. 69, pp. 279–301, 1993.
  27.  Y. Zhao, S.A. Billings, and D. Coca, “Cellular automata modelling of dendritic crystal growth based on Moore and von Neumann neighborhoods,” Int. J. Model. Identif. Control, vol.  2, no. 6, pp. 119–25, 2009.
  28.  P. Rosin, A. Adamatzky, and X. Sun (eds.), Cellular Automata in Image Processing and Geometry, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2014.
  29.  N. Inou, N. Shimotai, and T. Uesugi, “A cellular automaton generating topological structures,” in Proc. 2nd European Conference on Smart Structures and Materials, 1994, vol. 2361, pp. 47–50.
  30.  N. Inou, T. Uesugi, A. Iwasaki, and S. Ujihashi, “Self-organization of mechanical structure by cellular automata,” Key Eng. Mater., vol. 145‒149, pp. 1115–1120, 1998.
  31.  E. Kita and T. Toyoda, “Structural design using cellular automata,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., vol. 19, pp. 64–73, 2000.
  32.  P. Hajela and B. Kim, “On the use of energy minimization for CA based analysis in elasticity,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., vol. 23, pp. 24–33, 2001.
  33.  B. Tatting and Z. Gurdal, “Cellular automata for design of two-dimensional continuum structures,” in Proc. 8th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, 2000, p. 10.
  34.  S. Missoum, Z. Gurdal, and S. Setoodeh, “Study of a new local update scheme for cellular automata in structural design,” Struct. Multidiscip.  Optim., vol. 29, pp. 103–112, 2005.
  35.  M.M. Abdalla and Z. Gurdal, “Structural design using cellular automata for eigenvalue problems,” Struct. Multidiscip.  Optim., vol. 19, pp. 64–73, 2004.
  36.  B. Hassani and M. Tavakkoli, “A multi-objective structural optimization using optimality criteria and cellular automata,” Asian J Civ. Eng. Build. Hous., vol. 8, pp. 77–88, 2007.
  37.  C.L. Penninger, A. Tovar, L.T. Watson, and J.E. Renaud, “KKT conditions satisfied using adaptive neighboring in hybrid cellular automata for topology optimization,” in Proc. 8th World Congress on Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., 2009, p. 10.
  38.  J. Jia et al., “Multiscale topology optimization for non-uniform microstructures with hybrid cellular automata,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim.,vol. 62, pp. 757–770, 2020.
  39.  M. Afrousheh, J. Marzbanrad, and D. Gohlich, “Topology optimization of energy absorbers under crashworthiness using modified hybrid cellular automata (MHCA) algorithm,” Struct. Multidiscip.  Optim., vol. 60, pp. 1021‒1034, 2019.
  40.  A. Tovar, N.M. Patel, and A.K. Kaushik, “Hybrid cellular automata: a biologically-inspired structural optimization technique,” in Proc. 10th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, 2004, p.15.
  41.  A. Tovar, N.M. Patel, G.L. Niebur, M. Sen, and J.E. Renaud, “Topology optimization using a hybrid cellular automaton method with local control rules,” J. Mech. Des., vol. 128, pp. 1205–1216, 2006.
  42.  C.L. Penninger, A. Tovar, L.T. Watson, and J.E. Renaud, “KKT conditions satisfied using adaptive neighboring in hybrid cellular automata for topology optimization,” Int. J. Pure Appl. Math., vol. 66, pp. 245–262, 2011.
  43.  B. Bochenek and K. Tajs-Zielinska, “Novel local rules of Cellular Automata applied to topology and size optimization,” Eng. Optim., vol. 44, pp. 23–35, 2012.
  44.  B. Bochenek and K. Tajs-Zielinska, “Topology optimization with efficient rules of cellular automata,” Eng. Comput., vol. 30, pp. 1086– 1106, 2013.
  45.  B. Bochenek and K. Tajs-Zielinska, “Minimal compliance topologies for maximal buckling load of columns,” Struct. Multidiscip.  Optim., vol. 51, pp. 1149–1157, 2015.
  46.  B. Bochenek and K. Tajs-Zielinska, “GOTICA – generation of optimal topologies by irregular cellular automata,” Struct. Multidiscip.  Optim., vol. 55, pp. 1989–2001, 2017.
  47.  M.P. Bendsoe and N. Kikuchi, “Generating optimal topologies in optimal design using a homogenization method,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 71, pp. 197–224, 1988.
  48.  J. Lim, C. You, and I. Dayyani, “Multi-objective topology optimization and structural analysis of periodic spaceframe structures,” Mater. Des., vol. 190, pp.16, 2020.
  49.  P. Gomes and R. Palacios, “Aerodynamic-driven topology optimization of compliant airfoils,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., vol. 62, pp. 2117– 2130, 2020.
  50.  J. Wu and J. Wu, “Revised level set-based method for topology optimization and its applications in bridge construction,” Open Civ. Eng. J., vol. 11, pp. 153–166, 2017.
  51.  A.J. Muminovic, M. Colic, E. Mesic, and I. Saric, “Innovative design of spur gear tooth with infill structure,” Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 477–483, 2020.
  52.  L.L. Beghini, A. Beghini, N. Katz, W.F. Baker, and G.H. Paulino, “Connecting architecture and engineering through structural topology optimization,” Eng. Struct., vol. 59, pp. 716–726, 2014.
  53.  K. Tajs-Zielinska and B. Bochenek, “Topology optimization – engineering contribution to architectural design,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 245, pp.10, 2017.
  54.  F. Regazzoni, N. Parolini, and M. Verani, “Topology optimization of multiple anisotropic materials, with application to self-assembling diblock copolymers,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 338, pp. 562–596, 2018.
  55.  S. Das and A. Sutradhar, “Multi-physics topology optimization of functionally graded controllable porous structures: Application to heat dissipating problems,” Mater. Des., vol. 193, pp.13, 2020.
  56.  M.P. Bendsoe and O. Sigmund, Topology optimization. Theory, methods and applications, Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer, 2003.
  57.  O. Sigmund and K. Maute, “Topology optimization approaches,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., vol.48, pp. 1031–1055, 2013.
  58.  J.D. Deaton, and R.V. Grandhi, “A survey of structural and multidisciplinary continuum topology optimization: post 2000,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., vol. 49, pp. 1–38, 2014.
  59.  J. Liu et al., “Current and future trends in topology optimization for additive manufacturing,” Struct. Multidiscip.  Optim., vol. 57, pp. 2457– 2483, 2018.
  60.  M.A. Herfelt, P.N. Poulsen, and L.C. Hoang, “Strength-based topology optimization of plastic isotropic von Mises materials,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., vol.59, pp. 893–906, 2019.
  61.  B. Błachowski, P. Tauzowski, and J. Lógó, “Yield limited optimal topology design of elastoplastic structures,” Struct. Multidiscip.  Optim., vol.61, pp. 1953–1976, 2020.
  62.  L. Xia, F. Fritzen, and P. Breitkopf, “Evolutionary topology optimization of elastoplastic structures,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., vol. 55, pp. 569–581, 2017
  63.  B. Bochenek and M. Mazur, “A novel heuristic algorithm for minimum compliance optimization,” Eng. Trans., vol. 64, pp.  541–546, 2016.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Katarzyna Tajs-Zielińska
1
Bogdan Bochenek
1

  1. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Al. Jana Pawła II 37, 31-864 Kraków, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

What is the limit of improvement the structure obtained directly from the liquid state, with possible heat treatment (supersaturation and aging)? This question was posed by casting engineers who put arbitrary requirements on reducing the DAS (Dendrite Arm Spacing) length to less than a dozen microns. The results of tests related to modification of the surface microstructure of AlSi7Mg alloy casting treated by laser beam and the rapid remelting and solidification of the superficial casting zone, were presented in the paper. The local properties of the surface treated with a laser beam concerns only a thickness ranging from a fraction to a single mm. These local properties should be considered in the aspect of application on surfaces of non-machined castings. Then the excellent surface layer properties can be used. The tests were carried out on the surface of the casting, the surface layer obtained in contact with the metal mould, after the initial machining (several mm), was treated by the laser beam. It turned out that the refinement of the microstructure measured with the DAS value is not available in a different way, i.e. directly by casting. The experimental-simulation validation using the Calcosoft CAFE (Cellular Automaton Finite Element) code was applied.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

J. Hajkowski
P. Popielarski
ORCID: ORCID
Z. Ignaszak
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Due to the importance of uranium and uranium alloys to national defence and nuclear industrial applications, it is necessary to understand dendrite formation in their solidification structures and to control their microstructures. In this study, a modified cellular automaton model was developed to predict 2-D and 3-D equiaxed dendrite growth in U-Nb alloys. The model takes into account solute diffusion, preferential growth orientation, interface curvature, etc., and the solid fraction increment is calculated using the local level rule method. Using this model, 2-D large-scale and 3-D equiaxed dendrite growth with various crystallographic orientations in the U-5.5Nb alloy were simulated, and the Nb micro-segregation behaviour during solidification was analysed. The simulated results showed reasonable agreement with the as-cast microstructure observed experimentally.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Bin Su
1
ORCID: ORCID
Jing-Yuan Liu
1
ORCID: ORCID
Xiao-Peng Zhang
1
ORCID: ORCID
Xue-Wei Yan
2
ORCID: ORCID

  1. China Academy of Engineering Physics, Institute of Materials, Jiangyou, China
  2. Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics, School of Aero Engine, Zhengzhou, China

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more