[1] J.A. Matts and D.H. McCoy. A graphical firing table model and a comparison of the accuracy of three utilization schemes. Report No. BRL-MR-2035, Army Ballistic Research Lab., Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, U.S., April 1970.
[2] H.L. Reed Jr. Firing table computations on the ENIAC. In Proceeding of the 1952 ACM national meeting (Pittsburgh), pages 103-106, Pennsylvania, USA, 2 May, 1952. doi: 10.1145/609784.609796.
[3] E.R. Dickinson. The production of firing tables for cannon artillery. Report No. BRL-R-1371, Army Ballistic Research Lab., Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, U.S., November 1967.
[4] S. Gorn and N.L. Juncosa. On the computational procedures for firing and bombing tables. Report No. BRL-R-889, Army Ballistic Research Lab., Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, U.S., November 1954.
[5] C. Niekerk, and W. Rossouw. A proposed format for firing tables of a series of carrier projectiles possessing ballistic similarity with a HE projectile. In Proceeding of the 20th International Symposium on Ballistics, pages 187–194, Orlando, USA, 23–27 September, 2002.
[6] S.A. Ortac, U. Durak, U. Kutluay, K. Kucuk, and M.C. Candan. NABK based next generation ballistic table toolkit. In Proceeding of the 23rd International Symposium on Ballistics, pages 765–774, Tarragona, Spain, 16–20 April, 2007.
[7] A.J. Sowa. NATO shareable software developing into true suite supporting national operational fire control systems. In Proceeding of the 24th International Symposium on Ballistics, pages 126–133, Louisiana, USA, 22–26 September, 2008.
[8] Z. Leciejewski, T. Zawada, P. Kowalczuk, J. Szymonik, and P. Czyronis. Selected ballistic aspects of fire control system designed to anti-aircraft gun. In Proceeding of the 28th International Symposium on Ballistics, pages 655–665, Atlanta, USA, 22–26 September, 2014.
[9] NATO. The Modified Point Mass and five Degrees of Freedom Trajectory Models. Standard No. STANAG-4355, NATO Standardization Agency, Belgium, April 2009.
[10] M. Khalil, X. Rui, Q. Zha, H. Yu, and H. Hendy. Projectile impact point prediction based on self-propelled artillery dynamics and doppler radar measurements. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2013:53913, 2013. doi: 10.1155/2013/153913.
[11] L. Baranowski. Feasibility analysis of the modified point mass trajectory model for the need of ground artillery fire control systems. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 51(3):511–522, 2013.
[12] M. Khalil, X. Rui, and H. Hendy. Discrete time transfer matrix method for projectile trajectory prediction. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 28(2):04014057, 2015. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943- 5525.0000381.
[13] L. Baranowski. Effect of the mathematical model and integration step on the accuracy of the results of computation of artillery projectile flight parameters. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences: Technical Sciences, 61(2):475–484, 2013. doi: 10.2478/bpasts-2013-0047.
[14] A. Szklarski, R. Głębocki, and M. Jacewicz. Impact point prediction guidance parametric study for 155 mm rocket assisted artillery projectile with lateral thrusters. Archive of Mechanical Engineering, 67(1):31–56, 2020. doi: 10.24425/ame.2020.131682.
[15] M. Aldoegre. Comparison Between Trajectory Models for Firing Table Application. MSc. Thesis, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa, 2019.
[16] C. Donneaud, R. Cayzac and P. Champigny. Recent developments on aeroballistics of yawing and spinning projectiles: Part II: free flight tests. In Proceeding of the 20th International Symposium on Ballistics, pages 655–665, Orlando, USA, 23–27 September, 2002.
[17] A. Dupuis, C. Berner, and V. Fleck. Aerodynamic characteristics of a long-range spinning artillery shell: Part 1: from aeroballistic range free-flight tests. In Proceeding of the 21st International Symposium on Ballistics, Adelaide, Australia, 19–23 April, 2004.
[18] T. Brown, T. Harkins, M. Don, R. Hall, J. Garner, and B. Davis. Development and demonstration of a new capability for aerodynamic characterization of medium caliber projectiles. In Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on Ballistics, pages 655–665, Atlanta, USA, 22–26 September, 2014.
[19] W. Zhou. An improved hybrid extended kalman filter based drag coefficient estimation for projectiles. In Proceedings of the 30th International Symposium on Ballistics, pages 80–91, California, USA, 11–15 September, 2017.
[20] M. Albisser, S. Dobre, C. Decrocq, F. Saada, B. Martinez, and P. Gnemmi. Aerodynamic characterization of a new concept of long range projectiles from free flight data. In Proceeding of the 30th International Symposium on Ballistics, pages 256–267, California, USA, 11–15 September, 2017.
[21] A. Ishchenko, V. Burkin, V. Faraponov, L. Korolkov, E. Maslov, A. Diachkovskiy, A. Chupashev, and A. Zykova. Determination of extra trajectory parameters of projectile layout motion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 919:012010, 2017, 1-5. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/919/1/012010.
[22] G. Surdu, I. Vedinaş, G. Slămnoiu, and Ş. Pamfil. Projectile’s drag coefficient evaluation for small finite differences of his geometrical dimensions using analytical methods. In: International Conference of Scientific Paper (AFASES 2015), Brasov, Romania, 28–30 May, 2015.
[23] R.L. McCoy. Modern Exterior Ballistics: The Launch and Flight Dynamics of Symmetric Projectiles, 2nd ed., Schiffer Publishing, 2009.
[24] R. H. Whyte. SPIN-73 an Updated Version of the SPINNER Computer Program. Report No. TR-4588, Armament Systems Dept., VT, U.S., November 1973.
[25] W. Yingbin. The application of ballistic filtering theory in the production of firing tables. Journal of Ballistics, 7(1):65–70, 1995. (in Chinese)
[26] W. Liang, B. Jiang, and Y. Sa. The application of simple regression method in producing the curve of accommodation coefficient in test for firing table. Journal of of Shanxi Datong University (Natural Science Edition), 26(1):23–25, 2010. (in Chinese)
[27] C. Xinjun. A study of fitting method for making ground artillery firing tables. Journal of Ballistics, 9(2):76–79, 1997. (in Chinese)
[28] W.-Q. Huang. A series of base functions for global analytical approach to firing table. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2(5):575–579, 1981. doi: 10.1007/bf01895460.
[29] N.P. Roberts. Ballistic analysis of firing table data for 155mm, M825 smoke projectile. Report No. BRL-MR-3865, Army Ballistic Research Lab., Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, U.S., September 1990.
[30] S. Wu, Q. Kang, L. Fu, and X. Jinxiang. A study on comparing test and its application on the firing table design. Journal of Ballistics, 15(4):22–26, 2003. (in Chinese)
[31] S. Floroff and B. Salatino. 120-MM Ammunition Feasibility Assessment for Light Artillery. Report No. ARFSD TR 99002, U.S Army Armament Reseach, Development and Engineering Center, NJ, USA, March 2000.
[32] D.L. Johnson, B.C. Roberts, and W.W. Vaughan. Reference and standard atmosphere models. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference on Aviation, Range and Aerospace Meteorology, Boston, USA, 13–16 May, 2002.
[33] V. Cech and J. Jevicky. Improved theory of generalized meteo-ballistic weighting factor functions and their use. Defence Technology, 12(3):242–254, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.dt.2016.01.009.
[34] V. Cech and J. Jevicky. Improved theory of projectile trajectory reference heights as characteristics of meteo-ballistic sensitivity functions. Defence Technology, 13(3):177–187, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.dt.2017.04.001.
[35] G.E. Wood. Test Design Plan (TDP) for the Production Qualification Testing (PQT) of the 81mm M984/M983 High Explosive (HE) Cartridges. Report No. AD-A257 403, U.S Army Materiel Systems Analysis Activity, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, U.S., October 1992.
[36] W. Haifeng, W. Pengxin, W. Long, and D. Lijie. Discussion on the revision of artillery standard firing conditions of our army. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 37(4):153–156, 2017. (in Chinese)
[37] FT-122-2A18: Firing Tables for Cannon, 122mm Howitzer, 2A18. Former Soviet Union, 1968.
[38] S. Karel and B. Martin. Conversions of METB3 meteorological messages into the METEO11 format. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Military Technologies (ICMT), pages 278-284, Brno, Czech Republic, 31 May - 2 Jun, 2017. doi: 10.1109/MILTECHS.2017.7988770.
[39] FT-155-AM-2: Firing Tables for Cannon, 155mm Howitzer, M185. US Department of the Army, 1983.
[40] Manual of the ICAO Standard Atmosphere: Extended to 80 Kilometres. International Civil Aviation Organization, 1993.
[41] K. Šilinger, L. Potužák, and J. Šotnar. Conversion of the METCM into the METEO-11. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Instrumentation, Measurement, Circuits And Systems (IMCAS '14), pages 212–218, Istanbul, Turkey, 15–17 December, 2014.
[42] Š. Karel, I. Jan, and P. Ladislav. Composition of the METEO11 meteorological message according to abstract of a measured meteorological data. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Military Technologies (ICMT), pages 194–199, Brno, Czech Republic, 31 May - 2 Jun, 2017. doi: 10.1109/MILTECHS.2017.7988755.
[43] NATO. Adoption of Standard Ballistic Meteorological Message. Standard No. STANAG 4061, NATO Standardization Agency, Belgium, October 2000.
[44] B. Karpov and L. Schmidt. The Aerodynamic Properties of the 155-mm Shell M101 from Free flight Range Tests of Full Scale and 1/12 Scale Models. Report No. BRL-MR-1582, Army Ballistic Research Lab., Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, U.S., June 1964.
[45] M. Khalil, H. Abdalla, and O. Kamal. Dispersion analysis for spinning artillery projectile. In Proceeding of the 13th International Conference on Aerospace Sciences and Aviation Technology, pages 1-12, Cairo, Egypt, 26–28 May, 2009. doi: 10.21608/asat.2009.23740.