How to search?
advanced search

Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 4
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:

Effect of sewage sludge on the yield and energy value of the aboveground biomass of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.)

Małgorzata Szostek Janina Kaniuczak Jadwiga Stanek-Tarkowska Tadeusz Jasiński Witold Niemiec Edmund Hajduk Robert Smusz
Archives of Environmental Protection | 2018 | No 3 | DOI: 10.24425/aep.2018.122285
Keywords sewage sludge biomass energy value Jerusalem artichoke
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Authors and Affiliations

Małgorzata Szostek
Janina Kaniuczak
Jadwiga Stanek-Tarkowska
Tadeusz Jasiński
Witold Niemiec
Edmund Hajduk
Robert Smusz

The Assessment of Jerusalem Artichoke Usability For Phytoremediation of Soils Contaminated with Cd, Pb, Ni, Cu, and Zn

Jacek Antonkiewicz Czesława Jasiewicz
Archives of Environmental Protection | 2003 | vol. 29 | No 4 | 81-87
Keywords Jerusalem artichoke phytoremediation heavy metals soil
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

A significant effect of soil pollution levels on yielding of Jerusalem artichoke was determined. Depending on the treatment, the decrease in the yield ranged between 6.62% and 88.74% in comparison with the control. High soil concentrations of Cd, Pb, Ni, Cu and Zn are confirmed by their contents in the test plant. The contents in Jerusalem was increasing with the level of soil pollution with heavy metals and ranged between 0.65-29.69 mg Cd; 1.40-7.32 mg Pb; 1.76-57.61 mg Ni; 1.65-9.23 mg Cu; 25.04-691.35 mg Zn/kg soil d.m. The smallest diversification of the studied metals contents was registered for lead and copper. A comparison of heavy metal per cent utilisation by Jerusalem reveals that it is possible to arrange the elements in the following order beginning from the highest values: Cd, Zn, Ni, Cu and Pb. The order shows that Jerusalem utilised Cd to the greatest extent and Pb to the smallest. The obtained results allow for a conclusion that Jerusalem artichoke could be utilised for reclamation of soils contaminated with heavy metals.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jacek Antonkiewicz
Czesława Jasiewicz

Application of response surface methodology to improve methane production from jerusalem artichoke straw

Yan Meng Yi Li Laisheng Chen Rui Han
Archives of Environmental Protection | 2022 | 48 | 3 | 70-79 | DOI: 10.24425/aep.2022.142691
Keywords jerusalem artichoke straw anaerobic digestion response surface methodology methane production
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion (AD) converts organic matter and biomass waste into biogas, making it an environmentally friendly technology to improve energy resources for a wide range of applications. Jerusalem artichoke straw (JAS) has an enriched content of cellulose and exhibits a high potential for methane production. AD-based production of methane can eff ectively utilize waste JAS. This study investigated the AD performance of JAS to explore the enhancement of methane yields by employing a Box-Behnken experimental design (BBD) of response surface methodology (RSM). The overall goal was to identify the optimal levels of pretreatment factors, including HCl concentration, pretreatment time, and pretreatment temperature, for producing optimal biomethane yields from JAS. The highest value of methane production achieved was 256.33 mL g-1VS by using an optimal concentration of HCl as 0.25 M, a pretreatment time of 10 h, and a pretreatment temperature of 25°C. These results inform the future application of JAS in enhanced methane production.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Adeleke, A.O., Latiff, A.A.A., Al-Gheethi, A.A. & Daud, Z. (2017). Optimization of operating parameters of novel composite adsorbent for organic pollutants removal from POME using response surface methodology,Chemosphere, 174, pp. 232-242. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.110.
  2. APHA. (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water & wastewater, American Public Health (Association. ed.), Washington DC: American Public Health Association.
  3. Cai, Y., Zhao, X., Zhao, Y., Wang, H., Yuan, X., Zhu, W., Cui, Z. & Wang, X. (2018). Optimization of Fe2+ supplement in anaerobic digestion accounting for the Fe-bioavailability, Bioresource Technology, 250, pp. 163-170. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.151.
  4. Cai, Y., Gallegos, D., Zheng, Z., Stinner, W., Wang, X., Pröter, J. & Schäfer, F. (2021). Exploring the combined effect of total ammonia nitrogen, pH and temperature on anaerobic digestion of chicken manure using response surface methodology and two kinetic models, Bioresource Technology, 337, 125328. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125328.
  5. Ciccoli, R., Sperandei, M., Petrazzuolo, F., Broglia, M., Chiarini, L., Correnti, A., Farneti, A., Pignatelli, V. & Tabacchioni, S. (2018). Anaerobic digestion of the above ground biomass of Jerusalem Artichoke in a pilot plant: Impact of the preservation method on the biogas yield and microbial community,Biomass and Bioenergy, 108, pp. 190-197. DOI:10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.11.003.
  6. Gabriel, S.A, Funmilayo, D.F. & Evariste, G.K. (2020). Process Optimisation of Enzymatic Saccharification of Soaking Assisted and Thermal Pretreated Cassava Peels Waste for Bioethanol Production, Waste and Biomass Valorization, 11, 4, pp. 2409-2420. DOI:10.1007/s12649-018-00562-0.
  7. Gnansounou, E. & Dauriat, A. (2010). Techno-economic analysis of lignocellulosic ethanol: A review, Bioresource Technology, 101, 13, pp. 4980-4991. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.009.
  8. Gunnarsson, I. B., Svensson, S. E., Johansson, E., Karakashev, D. & Angelidaki, I. (2014). Potential of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthustuberosus L.) as a biorefinery crop, Industrial Crops & Products, 56, pp. 231-240. DOI:10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.03.010.
  9. Günerhan, Ü., Us, E., Dumlu, L., Yılmaz, V., Carrère, H. & Perendeci, A.N. (2020). Impacts of Chemical-Assisted Thermal Pretreatments on Methane Production from Fruit and Vegetable Harvesting Wastes: Process Optimization, Molecules, 23, 25, 500. DOI:10.3390/molecules25030500.
  10. Hassan, T.M., Hossain, M.S., Kassim, M.H., Ibrahim, M., Mohammad, N.F. & Hussin, M. H. (2020). Optimizing the Acid Hydrolysis Process for the Isolation of Microcrystalline Cellulose from Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunches Using Response Surface Methods, Waste and Biomass Valorization, 11, 6, pp. 2755-2770. DOI:10.1007/s12649-019-00627-8.
  11. Hossain, M. Z., Suely, A., Yun, J., Zhang, G., Faisal, N. A., Qi, X. & J.N. S. (2019). Recent advances in biological pretreatment of microalgae and lignocellulosic biomass for biofuel production, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 105, pp. 105-128. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.048.
  12. Kafle, Gopi Krishna, Kim & Sang Hun. (2013). Anaerobic treatment of apple waste with swine manure for biogas production: batch and continuous operation, Applied Energy, 103, pp. 61-72. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.10.018.
  13. Khalid, H., Cai, F., Zhang, J., Zhang, R., Wang, W., Liu, G. & Chen, C. (2019). Optimizing key factors for biomethane production from KOH-pretreated switchgrass by response surface methodology, Environmental science and pollution research international, 26, 24, pp. 25084-25091. DOI:10.1007/s11356-019-05615-y.
  14. Kim, M., Kim, B., Nam, K. & Choi, Y. (2018). Effect of pretreatment solutions and conditions on decomposition and anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass in rice straw, Biochemical Engineering Journal, 140, pp. 108-114. DOI:10.1016/j.bej.2018.09.012.
  15. Kim, S., Park, J.M. & Kim, C.H. (2013). Ethanol production using whole plant biomass of Jerusalem artichoke by Kluyveromycesmarxianus CBS1555, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 169, 5, pp. 1531-1545. DOI:10.1007/s12010-013-0094-5.
  16. Kozłowski, K., Dach, J., Lewicki, A., Malińska, K., Isaias Emilio Paulino do Carmo. & Czekała, W. (2019). Potential of biogas production from animal manure in Poland, Archives of Environmental Protection, 45, 3, pp. 98-108. DOI:10.24425/aep.2019.128646.
  17. Kreuger, E., Sipos, B., Zacchi, G., Svensson, S.E., Bjornsson, L. (2011). Bioconversion of industrial hemp to ethanol and methane: The benefits of steam pretreatment and co-production, Bioresource Technology, 102, pp. 3457-3465. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.126.
  18. Li, C., Liu, G., Nges, I. A. & Liu, J. (2016). Enhanced biomethane production from Miscanthuslutarioriparius using steam explosion pretreatment, Fuel, 179, pp. 267-273. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2016.03.087.
  19. Liu, J., Yang, M., Zhang, J., Zheng, J., Xu, H., Wang, Y. & Wei, Y. (2018). A comprehensive insight into the effects of microwave-H2O2 pretreatment on concentrated sewage sludge anaerobic digestion based on semi-continuous operation, Bioresource Technology, 256, pp. 118-127. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.126.
  20. Li, W., Zhang, J., Yu, C., Li, Q., Dong, F., Wang, G., Gu, G. & Guo, Z. (2015). Extraction, degree of polymerization determination and prebiotic effect evaluation of inulin from Jerusalem artichoke, Carbohydrate Polymers, 121, pp. 315-319. DOI:10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.12.055.
  21. Long, X., Shao, H., Liu, L., Liu, L. & Liu, Z. (2016). Jerusalem artichoke: A sustainable biomass feedstock for biorefinery, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, pp. 1382-1388. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.063.
  22. Monlau, F., Sambusiti, C., Barakat, A., Guo, X.M., Latrille, E., Trably, E., Steyer, J.P., Carrere, H. (2012). Predictive models of biohydrogen and biomethane production based on the compositional and structural features of lignocellulosic materials, Environmental science & technology, 6, 46, pp. 12217-12225. DOI:10.1021/es303132t.
  23. Nges, A. I., Li, C., Wang, B., Xiao, L., Yi, Z., Liu, J. (2016). Physio-chemical pretreatments for improved methane potential of Miscanthuslutarioriparius, Fuel, 166, pp. 29-35. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2015.10.108.
  24. Nowicka, A., Zieliński, M., Dębowski, M., Dudek, M. (2021). Progress in the Production of Biogas from Maize Silage after Acid-Heat Pretreatment, Energies, 14, 8018. DOI:10.3390/EN14238018.
  25. Oh, S.Y., Yoo, D.I., Shin, Y., Kim, H.C., Kim, H.Y., Chung, Y.S., Park, W.H. & Youk, J.H. (2005). Crystalline structure analysis of cellulose treated with sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide by means of X-ray diffraction and FTIR spectroscopy, Carbohydrate Research, 340, 15, pp. 2376-2391. DOI:10.1016/j.carres.2005.08.007.
  26. Oyekanmi, A.A., Ahmad,A., MohdSetapar, S.H., Alshammari, M.B., Jawaid, M., Hanafiah, M.M., Abdul Khalil, H.P.S. & Vaseashta, A. (2021a). Sustainable Duriozibethinus-Derived Biosorbents for Congo Red Removal from Aqueous Solution: Statistical Optimization, Isotherms and Mechanism Studies, Sustainability, 13, 13264. DOI:10.3390/SU132313264.
  27. Oyekanmi, A.A., Alshammari, M.B., Ibrahim, M.N.M., Hanafiah, M.M., Elnaggar, A.Y., Ahmad, A., Oyediran, A.T., Rosli, M.A., Mohd, Setapar, S.H., Nik, Daud, N.N. & Hussein, E.E. (2021b). Highly Effective Cow Bone Based Biocomposite for the Sequestration of Organic Pollutant Parameter from Palm Oil Mill Effluent in a Fixed Bed Column Adsorption System, Polymers (Basel), 27, 14, 86. DOI:10.3390/polym14010086.
  28. Passos, F., Felix, L., Rocha, H., Pereira, Jde, O., de, Aquino, S. (2016). Reuse of microalgae grown in full-scale wastewater treatment ponds: Thermochemical pretreatment and biogas production, Bioresource Technology, 209, pp. 305-312. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.006.
  29. Passos, F., Ortega, V. & Donoso-Bravo, A. (2017). Thermochemical pretreatment and anaerobic digestion of dairy cow manure: Experimental and economic evaluation, Bioresource Technology, 227, pp. 239-246. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.12.034.
  30. Paudel, S.R., Banjara, S.P., Choi, O.K., Park, K.Y., Kim, Y.M. & Lee, J.W. (2017). Pretreatment of agricultural biomass for anaerobic digestion: Current state and challenges, Bioresource Technology, 245, pp. 1194-1205. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.182.
  31. Pfariso, M., Eugéne, R., Annie, F. A. C & Johann, F. G. (2021). Maximising the Benefits of Enzyme Synergy in the Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation of Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) Tuber Residues into Ethanol, Waste and Biomass Valorization.Waste Biomass Valor, 13, pp. 535–546. DOI:10.1007/S12649-021-01488-W.
  32. Pokój, T., Gusiatin, M. Z., Bułkowska, K. & Dubis, B. (2014). Production of biogas using maize silage supplemented with residual glycerine from biodiesel manufacturing, Archives of Environmental Protection, 40, 4, pp. 17-29. DOI:10.2478/aep-2014-0035.
  33. Shen, J., Zhang, J., Wang, W., Liu, G. & Chen, Ch. (2019). Assessment of pretreatment effects on anaerobic digestion of switchgrass: Economics-energy-environment (3E) analysis, Industrial Crops & Products, 145, 111957. DOI:10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111957.
  34. Song, Z., Yang, G., Liu, X., Yan, Z., Yuan, Y. & Liao, Y. (2014). Comparison of seven chemical pretreatments of corn straw for improving methane yield by anaerobic digestion, PLoS One, 2, 9. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0093801.
  35. Tian, W., Li, J., Zhu, L., Li, W., He, L., Gu, L., Deng, R., Shi, D., Chai, H. & Gao M. (2021). Insights of enhancing methane production under high-solid anaerobic digestion of wheat straw by calcium peroxide pretreatment and zero valent iron addition, Renewable Energy, 177,pp. 21-32. DOI:10.1016/J.RENENE.2021.06.042.
  36. Van Soest P.J., Robertson J.B. & Lewis B.A. (1991). Methods for Dietary Fiber, Neutral Detergent Fiber, and Nonstarch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition, Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 10, pp. 3583–3597. DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2.
  37. Wang, D.L., Ai, P., Yu, L., Tan, Z.X. & Zhang, Y.L. (2015). Comparing the hydrolysis and biogas production performance of alkali and acid pretreatments of rice straw using two-stage anaerobic fermentation, Biosystems Engineering, 132, pp. 47-55. DOI:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2015.02.007.
  38. Wu, Z., Nguyen, D., Lam, T.Y.C., Zhuang, H., Shrestha, S., Raskin, L., Khanal, S.K. & Lee, P.H. (2021). Synergistic association between cytochrome bd-encoded Proteiniphilum and reactive oxygen species (ROS)-scavenging methanogens in microaerobic-anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass, WaterResearch, 15, 190, 116721. DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2020.116721.
  39. Yang, S., Sun, X., Jiang, X., Wang, L., Tian, J., Li, L., Zhao, M. & Zhong, Q. (2019). Characterization of the Tibet plateau Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) transcriptome by de novo assembly to discover genes associated with fructan synthesis and SSR analysis, Hereditas, 6, 156, 9. DOI:10.1186/s41065-019-0086-8.
  40. Zhang, H., Khalid, H., Li, W., He, Y., Liu, G. & Chen, C. (2018a). Employing response surface methodology (RSM) to improve methane production from cotton stalk, Environmental science and pollution research international, 25,8, pp. 7618-7624. DOI:10.1007/s11356-017-0682-y.
  41. Zhang, H., Ning, Z., Khalid, H., Zhang, R., Liu, G. & Chen, C. (2018b). Enhancement of methane production from Cotton Stalk using different pretreatment techniques, Scientific reports, 8, 1, 3463. DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-21413-x.
  42. Zhang, H., Wang, L., Dai, Z., Zhang, R., Chen, C. & Liu, G. (2019). Effect of organic loading, feed-to-inoculum ratio, and pretreatment on the anaerobic digestion of tobacco stalks, Bioresource Technology, 298, 122474. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122474.
  43. Zhao, C., Cui, X., Liu, Y., Zhang, R., He, Y., Wang, W., Chen, C. & Liu, G. (2017). Maximization of the methane production from durian shell during anaerobic digestion, Bioresource Technology, 238, pp. 433-438. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.184.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Yan Meng
1
Yi Li
1
Laisheng Chen
1
Rui Han
1
  1. Qinghai Key Laboratory of Vegetable Genetics and Physiology, Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai 810016, China

Mathematical models use to yield prognosis of perennials on marginal land according to fertilisers doses

Marek Hryniewicz Maria Strzelczyk Marek Helis Anna Paszkiewicz-Jasińska Aleksandra Steinhoff-Wrzesniewska Kamil Roman
Journal of Water and Land Development | 2021 | No 51 | 233-242 | DOI: 10.24425/jwld.2021.139034
Keywords biomass cup plant fertiliser Jerusalem artichoke mathematical modelling nitrogen willowleaf sunflower yield
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Models describe our beliefs about how the world functions. In mathematical modelling, we translate those beliefs into the language of mathematics. Mathematical models can yield prognose on the base of applied fertiliser dose. In this work results of finding yield mathematical model according to fertiliser (nitrogen) dose for perennials (willowleaf sunflower Helianthus salicifolious, cup plant Silphium perfoliatum and Jerusalem artichoke Helianthus tuberosus) on marginal land are presented. Models were described as normalised square equations for dependence between yield and fertiliser doses. Experiments were conducted in lisymeters and vases for willowleaf sunflower and cup plant. For Jerusalem artichoke experiments were done in vases only. All experiments have been doing during two years (2018 and 2019) for different fertilisers doses (45, 90 and 135 kg N∙ha–1) in three repetitions. From simulations maximal yield could be achieved for following fertiliser doses – willowleaf sunflower 104 kg N∙ha–1, cup plant 85 kg N∙ha–1 and Jerusalem artichoke 126 kg N∙ha–1.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marek Hryniewicz
1
ORCID: ORCID
Maria Strzelczyk
1
ORCID: ORCID
Marek Helis
1
ORCID: ORCID
Anna Paszkiewicz-Jasińska
1
ORCID: ORCID
Aleksandra Steinhoff-Wrzesniewska
1
ORCID: ORCID
Kamil Roman
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Institute of Technology and Life Sciences – National Research Institute, Falenty, Hrabska Av. 3, 09-090 Raszyn, Poland

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more