Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 2
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The degradation of photovoltaic modules and their subsequent loss of performance has a serious impact on the total energy generation potential. The lack of real-time information on the output power leads to additional losses since the panels may not be operating at their optimal point. To understand the behaviour, numerically simulate the characteristics and identify the optimal operating point of a photovoltaic cell, the parameters of an equivalent electrical circuit must first be identified. The aim of this work is to develop a total least-squares based algorithm which can identify those parameters from the output voltage and current measurements, taking into consideration the uncertainties on both measured quantities. This work presents a comparative study of the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and Total Least Squares (TLS) approaches to the estimation of the parameters of a photovoltaic cell.
Go to article

Bibliography

[1] Blaabjerg, F., & Ionel, D. M. (2015). Renewable Energy Devices and Systems – State-of-the-Art Technology, Research and Development, Challenges and Future Trends. Electric Power Components and Systems, 43(12), 1319–1328. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325008.2015.1062819
[2] Höök, M., & Tang, X. (2013). Depletion of fossil fuels and anthropogenic climate change – A review. Energy Policy, 52, 797–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.046
[3] Gangopadhyay, U., Jana, S., & Das, S. (2013). State of Art of Solar Photovoltaic Technology. Conference Papers in Energy, 2013, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/764132
[4] Mao, M., Cui, L., Zhang, Q., Guo, K., Zhou, L.,&Huang, H. (2020). Classification and summarization of solar photovoltaic MPPT techniques: A review based on traditional and intelligent control strategies. Energy Reports, 6, 1312–1327.
[5] Ahmed, M. T., Rashel, M. R., Faisal, F.,&Tlemçani, M. (2020). Non-iterative MPPT Method:AComparative Study. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research (IJRER), 10(2), 549–557.
[6] Azmi, F. F. A., Sahraoui, B., & Muzakir, S. K. (2019). Study of ZnO nanospheres fabricated via thermal evaporation for solar cell application. Makara Journal of Technology, 23(1), 11–15.
[7] Boyd, M. T., Klein, S. A., Reindl, D. T., & Dougherty, B. P. (2011). Evaluation and validation of equivalent circuit photovoltaic solar cell performance models. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 133(2). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4003584
[8] Bader, S., Ma, X., & Oelmann, B. (2020). A Comparison of One- and Two-Diode Model Parameters at Indoor Illumination Levels. IEEE Access, 8, 172057–172064. https://doi.org/10.1016/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3025146
[9] Ciani, L., Catelani, M., Carnevale, E. A., Donati, L., & Bruzzi, M. (2015). Evaluation of the Aging Process of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Under Different Stress Conditions. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 64(5), 1179–1187. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2014.2381352
[10] Ndiaye, A., Charki, A., Kobi, A., Kébé, C. M. F., Ndiaye, P. A., & Sambou, V. (2013). Degradations of silicon photovoltaic modules: A literature review. Solar Energy, 96, 140–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/10.1016/j.solener.2013.07.005
[11] Lay-Ekuakille, A., Ciaccioli, A., Griffo, G., Visconti, P., & Andria, G. (2018). Effects of dust on photovoltaic measurements: A comparative study. Measurement, 113, 181–188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.06.025
[12] Cristaldi, L., Faifer, M., Rossi, M., Toscani, S., Catelani, M., Ciani, L., & Lazzaroni, M. (2014). Simplified method for evaluating the effects of dust and aging on photovoltaic panels. Measurement, 54, 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2014.03.001
[13] Carullo, A., Ferraris, F., Vallan, A., Spertino, F., & Attivissimo, F. (2014). Uncertainty analysis of degradation parameters estimated in long-term monitoring of photovoltaic plants. Measurement, 55, 641–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2014.06.003
[14] Cubas, J., Pindado, S., & Victoria, M. (2014). On the analytical approach for modeling photovoltaic systems behavior. Journal of Power Sources, 247, 467–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.09.008
[15] Batzelis, E. I., & Papathanassiou, S. A. (2016). A Method for the Analytical Extraction of the Single-Diode PV Model Parameters. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 7(2), 504–512. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2015.2503435
[16] Hassan Ali, M., Rabhi, A., Haddad, S., & El Hajjaji, A. (2017). Real-Time Determination of Solar Cell Parameters. Journal of Electronic Materials, 46(11), 6535–6543. https://doi.org/10.1016/10.1007/s11664-017-5697-0
[17] Subudhi, B., & Pradhan, R. (2018). Bacterial Foraging Optimization Approach to Parameter Extraction of a Photovoltaic Module. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 9(1), 381–389. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2017.2736060
[18] Long, W., Cai, S., Jiao, J., Xu, M., & Wu, T. (2020). A new hybrid algorithm based on grey wolf optimizer and cuckoo search for parameter extraction of solar photovoltaic models. Energy Conversion and Management, 203, 112243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112243
[19] Liao, Z., Chen, Z., & Li, S. (2020). Parameters Extraction of Photovoltaic Models Using Triple- Phase Teaching-Learning-Based Optimization. IEEE Access, 8, 69937–69952. https://doi.org/10.1016/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2984728
[20] Ibrahim, I. A., Hossain, M. J., Duck, B. C., & Fell, C. J. (2020). An AdaptiveWind-Driven Optimization Algorithm for Extracting the Parameters of a Single-Diode PV Cell Model. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 11(2), 1054–1066. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2019.2917513
[21] Gomes, R. C. M., Vitorino, M. A., Corrêa, M. B. de R., Fernandes, D. A.,&Wang, R. (2017). Shuffled Complex Evolution on Photovoltaic Parameter Extraction:AComparative Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 8(2), 805–815. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2016.2620941
[22] Dkhichi, F., Oukarfi, B., Fakkar, A., & Belbounaguia, N. (2014). Parameter identification of solar cell model using Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm combined with simulated annealing. Solar Energy, 110, 781–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.09.033
[23] Alam, D. F., Yousri, D. A., & Eteiba, M. B. (2015). Flower Pollination Algorithm based solar PV parameter estimation. Energy Conversion and Management, 101, 410–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.05.074
[24] Diab, A. A. Z., Sultan, H. M., Do, T. D., Kamel, O. M., & Mossa, M. A. (2020). Coyote Optimization Algorithm for Parameters Estimation of Various Models of Solar Cells and PV Modules. IEEE Access, 8, 111102–111140. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3000770
[25] Mesbahi, O., Tlemçani, M., Janeiro, F. M., Hajjaji, A., & Kandoussi, K. (2020). A Modified Nelder– Mead Algorithm for Photovoltaic Parameters Identification. International Journal of Smart Grid – IJSmartGrid, 4(1), 28–37.
[26] Mesbahi, O., Tlemçani, M., Janeiro, F. M., Abdeloawahed, H., & Khalid, K. (2019). Estimation of Photovoltaic Panel Parameters by a Numerical Heuristic Searching Algorithm. In 2019 8th International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA) (pp. 401-406). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRERA47325.2019.8996779
[27] Hutcheson, G. D. (2011). Ordinary least-squares regression. L. Moutinho and G.D. Hutcheson, The SAGE Dictionary of Quantitative Management Research, 224–228.
[28] Hadjdida, A., Bourahla, M., Ertan, H. B., & Bekhti, M. (2018). Analytical Modelling, Simulation and Comparative Study of Multi-Junction Solar Cells Efficiency. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research, 8(4), 1824–1832.
[29] Salmi, T., Bouzguenda, M., Gastli, A.,&Masmoudi, A. (2012).MATLAB / Simulink Based Modelling of Solar Photovoltaic Cell. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research (IJRER), 2(2), 213– 218.
[30] Dimova-Malinovska, D. (2010). The state-of-the-art and future development of the photovoltaic technologies – The route from crystalline to nanostructured and new emerging materials. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 253(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/253/1/012007
[31] Mahmoud, Y., Xiao, W., & Zeineldin, H. H. (2012). A Simple Approach to Modeling and Simulation of Photovoltaic Modules. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 3(1), 185–186. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2011.2170776
[32] Ishaque, K., Salam, Z., & Taheri, H. (2011). Simple, fast and accurate two-diode model for photovoltaic modules. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 95(2), 586–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2010.09.023
[33] Babu, B. C., & Gurjar, S. (2014). A Novel Simplified Two-Diode Model of Photovoltaic (PV) Module. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 4(4), 1156–1161. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2014.2316371
[34] Nelder, J. A.,&Mead, R. (1965).Asimplex method for function minimization. The Computer Journal, 7(4), 308–313. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308
[35] Rashel, M. R., Rifat, J., Gonçalves, T., Tlemcani, M., & Melicio, R. (2017). Sensitivity Analysis Through Error Function of Crystalline-Si Photovoltaic Cell Model Integrated in a Smart Grid. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research, 7(4).
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Oumaima Mesbahi
1 2
Mouhaydine Tlemçani
1 2
Fernando M. Janeiro
1 2 3
Abdeloawahed Hajjaji
4
Khalid Kandoussi
4

  1. University of Évora, Department of Mechatronics, R. Romão Ramalho 59, 7000-671 Évora, Portugal
  2. Instrumentation and Control Laboratory, Institute of Earth Sciences, Évora, Portugal
  3. Instituto de Telecomunicações, Lisbon, Portugal
  4. University of Chouaib Doukkali, Energy Engineering Laboratory, National School of Applied Sciences, El Jadida, Morocco
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Micro perforated panel (MPP) absorber is a new form of acoustic absorbing material in comparison with porous ones. These absorbers are considered as next generation ones and the best alternative for traditional porous materials like foams. MPP combined with a uniform air gap constructs an absorber which has high absorption but in a narrow bandwidth of frequency. This characteristic makes MPPAs insufficient for practical purposes in comparison with porous materials. In this study instead of using a uniform air gap behind the MPP, the cavity is divided into several partitions with different depth arrangement which have parallel faces. This method improves the absorption bandwidth to reach the looked for goal. To achieve theoretical absorption of this absorber, equivalent electro-acoustic circuit and Maa’s theory (Maa, 1998) are employed. Maa suggested formulas to calculate MPP’s impedance which show good match with experimental results carried out in previous studies. Electro-acoustic analogy is used to combine MPP’s impedance with acoustic impedances of complex partitioned cavity. To verify the theoretical analyses, constructed samples are experimentally tested via impedance tube. To establish the test, a multi-depth setup facing a MPP is inserted into impedance tube and the absorption coefficient is examined in the 63–1600 Hz frequency range. Theoretical results show good agreement compared to measured data, by which a conclusion can be made that partitioning the cavity behind MPP into different depths will improve absorption bandwidth and the electro-acoustic analogy is an appropriate theoretical method for absorption enhancement research, although an optimisation process is needed to achieve best results to prove the capability of this absorber. The optimisation process provides maximum possible absorption in a desired frequency range for a specified cavity configuration by giving the proper cavity depths. In this article numerical optimisation has been done to find cavity depths for a unique MPP.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Falsafi Iman
Ohadi Abdolreza

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more