Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 9
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The economics of an ORC system is strictly linked to thermodynamic properties of the working fluid. A bad choice of working fluid could lead to a less efficient and expensive plant/generation unit. Some selection criteria have been put forward by various authors, incorporating thermodynamic properties, provided in literature but these do not have a general character. In the paper a simple analysis has been carried out which resulted in development of thermodynamic criteria for selection of an appropriate working fluid for subcritical and supercritical cycles. The postulated criteria are expressed in terms of non-dimensional numbers, which are characteristic for different fluids. The efficiency of the cycle is in a close relation to these numbers. The criteria are suitable for initial fluid selection. Such criteria should be used with other ones related to environmental impact, economy, system size, etc. Examples of such criteria have been also presented which may be helpful in rating of heat exchangers, which takes into account both heat transfer and flow resistance of the working fluid.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Dariusz Mikielewicz
Jarosław Mikielewicz
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In this paper, the thermodynamic investigation on the use of geothermal water (130°C as maximum) for power generation through a basic Rankine has been presented together with obtained main results. Six typical organic working fluids (i.e., R245fa, R141b, R290, R600, R152a, and 134a) were studied with modifying the input pressure and temperature to the turbine. The results show that there are no significant changes taking place in the efficiency for these working fluids with overheating the inlet fluid to the turbine, i.e., efficiency is a weak function of temperature. However, with the increasing of pressure ratio in the turbine, the efficiency rises more sharply. The technical viability is shown of implementing this type of process for recovering low temperature heat resource.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Yan-Na Liu
Song Xiao
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The evaporation temperature is regarded as one of the major parameters influencing the organic Rankine cycle (ORC) efficiency. Majority of contributions in literature for ORC cycle analyses treat the heat source as if it had an infinite heat capacity. Such analyses are not valuable as the resulting temperature drops of the heat source needs to be small. That leads to the fact that the heat source is not well explored and in the case of waste heat utilization it can prove the poor economics of the ORC. In the present study cooperation of the ORC cycle with the heat source available as a single phase or phase changing fluids is considered. The analytical heat balance models have been developed, which enable in a simple way calculation of heating fluid temperature variation as well as the ratio of flow rates of heating and working fluids in ORC cycle. The developed analytical expressions enable also calculation of the outlet temperature of the heating fluid.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Dariusz Mikielewicz
Jarosław Mikielewicz
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The results of investigations conducted on the prototype of vapour driven micro-CHP unit integrated with a gas boiler are presented. The system enables cogeneration of heat and electric energy to cover the energy demand of a household. The idea of such system is to produce electricity for own demand or for selling it to the electric grid – in such situation the system user will became the prosumer. A typical commercial gas boiler, additionally equipped with an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) module based on environmentally acceptable working fluid can be regarded as future generation unit. In the paper the prototype of innovative domestic cogenerative ORC system, consisting of a conventional gas boiler and a small size axial vapour microturbines (in-house designed for ORC and the commercially available for Rankine cycle (RC)), evaporator and condenser were scrutinised. In the course of study the fluid working temperatures, rates of heat, electricity generation and efficiency of the whole system were obtained. The tested system could produce electricity in the amount of 1 kWe. Some preliminary tests were started with water as working fluid and the results for that case are also presented. The investigations showed that domestic gas boiler was able to provide the saturated/superheated ethanol vapour (in the ORC system) and steam (in the RC system) as working fluids.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Dariusz Mikielewicz
Jan Wajs
Michał Bajor
Zbigniew Kneba
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Turbine stages can be divided into two types: impulse stages and reaction stages. The advantages of one type over the second one are generally known based on the basic physics of turbine stage. In this paper these differences between mentioned two types of turbines were indicated on the example of single stage turbines dedicated to work in organic Rankine cycle (ORC) power systems. The turbines for two ORC cases were analysed: the plant generating up to 30 kW and up to 300 kW of net electric power, respectively. Mentioned ORC systems operate with different working fluids: DMC (dimethyl carbonate) for the 30 kW power plant and MM (hexamethyldisiloxane) for the 300 kW power plant. The turbines were compared according to three major issues: thermodynamic and aerodynamic performance, mechanical and manufacturing aspects. The analysis was performed by means of the 0D turbomachinery theory and 3D computational aerodynamic calculations. As a result of this analysis, the paper indicates conclusions which type of turbine is a recommended choice to use in ORC systems taking into account the features of these systems.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Dawid Zaniewski
Piotr Klimaszewski
Łukasz Witanowski
Łukasz Jędrzejewski
Piotr Klonowicz
Piotr Lampart
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In order to recover the low grade waste heat and increase system fuel economy for main engine 10S90ME-C9.2-TII(part load, exhaust gas bypass) installed on a 10000 TEU container ship, a non-cogeneration and single-pressure type of waste heat recovery system based on organic Rankine cycle is proposed. Organic compound candidates appropriate to the system are analyzed and selected. Thermodynamic model of the whole system and thermoeconomic optimization are performed. The saturated organic compound vapor mass flow rate, net electric power output, pinch point, thermal efficiency and exergy efficiency varied with different evaporating temperature are thermodynamically analyzed. The results of thermodynamic and thermoeconomic optimization indicate that the most appropriate organic compound candidate is R141b due to its highest exergy efficiency, biggest unit cost benefit and shortest payback time.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Zheshu Ma
Yong Zhang
Junhua Wu
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In most production plants, waste heat is usually discharged into the environment, contributing to a reduction in the energy efficiency of industrial processes. This is often due to the low thermal parameters of the carriers in which this energy is contained, such as oils, water, exhaust gases or other post-process gases, which means that their use for electricity production in a conventional Rankine cycle may prove to be economically unprofitable. One of the technologies enabling the use of lowand medium-temperature waste heat carriers is the organic Rankine cycle (ORC) technology. The paper present results of calculations performed to evaluate potential electricity production in ORC using waste heat from a natural gas-fired glass melting furnace. The analysis was carried out assuming the use of a single-stage axial turbine, whose efficiency was estimated using correlations available in the literature. The calculations were carried out for three working fluids, namely hexamethyldisiloxane, dimethyl carbonate, and toluene for two scenarios, i.e. ORC system dedicated only to electricity production and ORC system working in cogeneration mode, where heat is obtain from cooling the condenser. In each of the considered cases, the ORC system achieves the net power output exceeding 300 kW (309 kW for megawatts in the cogenerative mode to 367 kW for toluene in the non-cogenerative mode), with an estimated turbine efficiency above 80%, in range of 80,75 to 83,78%. The efficiency of the ORC system, depending on the used working fluid and the adopted scenario, is in the range from 14.85 to 16.68%, achieving higher efficiency for the non-cogenerative work scenario.
Go to article

Bibliography

[1] Papapetrou M., Kosmadakis G., Cipollina A., La Commare U., Micale G.: Industrial waste heat: Estimation of the technically available resource in the EU per industrial sector, temperature level and country. Appl. Therm. Eng. 138(2018), 207–216.
[2] Forman C., Muritala I.K., Pardemann R., Meyer B.: Estimating the global waste heat potential. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev. 57(2016), 1568–1579.
[3] Szargut J., Ziebik A., KoziołJ., Kurpisz K., Majza E.: Industrial Waste Energy. Usage Rules. Devices. WNT, Warsaw 1993 (in Polish). [4] Tartiere T., Astolfi T.: A world overview of the organic Rankine cycle market. Energy Proced. 129(2017), 2–9.
[5] Tartiere T.: World overview of the organic Rankine cycle technology. https://orcworld- map.org/ (accessed: 18 July 2020).
[6] Da Lio L., Manente G., Branchini L., Lazzaretto A.: Predicting the optimum design of single stage axial expanders in orc systems: Is there a single efficiency map for different working fluids? Appl. Energ. 167(2016), 44–58.
[7] Elson A., Tidball R., Hampson A.: Waste heat to power market assessment. ICF International (2015). https://web.ornl.gov/sci/buildings/docs/ORNL%20TM-2014- 620%20Waste%20Heat%20to (accessed: 20 July 2020).
[8] Lu H.: Capturing the invisible resource: Analysis of waste heat potential in Chinese industry and policy options for waste heat to power generation. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab.), 2015. https://china.lbl.gov/sites/ all/files/lbnl-179618.pdf (accessed: 08 Aug. 2020).
[9] Campana F., Bianchi M., Branchini L., De Pascale A., Peretto A., Baresi M., Fermi A., Rossetti N., Vescovo R.: ORC waste heat recovery in european energy intensive industries: Energy and ghg savings. Energ. Convers. Manage. 76(2013), 244–252.
[10] Klimaszewski P., Zaniewski D., Witanowski Ł., Suchocki T., Klonowicz P., Lampart P.: A case study of working fluid selection for a small-scale waste heat recovery ORC system. Arch. Thermodyn. 40(2019), 3, 159-180
[11] Mikielewicz D., Mikielewicz J.: Criteria for selection of working fluid in lowtemperature ORC. Chem. Process Eng. 37(2016), 3, 428–440.
[12] Sprouse III C., Depcik C.: Review of organic Rankine cycles for internal combustion engine exhaust waste heat recovery. Appl. Therm. Eng. 51(2013), 1–2, 711–722.
[13] Angelino G., di Paliano P.C.: Multicomponent working fluids for organic Rankine cycles (ORCs). Energy 23(1998), 6, 449–663.
[14] Preißinger M., Schwöbel J.A.H., Klamt A., Brüggemann D.: Multi-criteria evaluation of several million working fluids for waste heat recovery by means of Organic Rankine Cycle in passenger cars and heavy-duty trucks. Appl. Energ. 206(2017), 887–889.
[15] Ahmandi B., Golneshan A.A., Arasteh H., Karimipour A., Bach Q.: Energy and exergy analysis and optimization of a gas turbine cycle coupled by a bottoming organic Rankine cycle. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 141(2020), 495–510.
[16] Park D.W., Jeong E.S., Kim K.H., Bineesh K.V., Park S.W., Lee J.W.: Synthesis of dimethyl carbonate by transesterification of ethylene carbonate and methanol using quaternary ammonium salt catalysts. Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 159(2006), 329– 332.
[17] Therminol 66 Heat Transfer Fluid, Product description, https://www.therminol.com /product/71093438 (accessed: 22 Oct. 2020).
[18] Machi E., Astolfi M.: Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) Power Systems, Technologies and Applications. Woodhead 2016.
[19] CHT Technika Chłodnicza Sp. z o.o., http://www.cht.server.pl/ (accessed 22 Apr. 2020).
[20] Van Rossum G., Drake F.L.: Python 3 Reference Manual. CreateSpace, Scotts Valley, CA, 2009.
[21] Bell I.H., Wronski J., Quoilin S., Lemort V.: Pure and pseudo-pure fluid thermophysical property evaluation and the open-source thermophysical property library coolprop. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 53(2014), 6, 2498–2508.
[22] Virtanen P. et al.: SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python. Nat. Methods 17(2020), 261–272, https://rdcu.be/b08Wh (accessed: 22 Oct. 2020).
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Arkadiusz Mateusz Musiał
1 2
Łukasz Antczak
1
Łukasz Jedrzejewski
3
Piotr Klonowicz
3

  1. Marani Sp. z o.o., Szybowa 14c, 41-808 Zabrze, Poland
  2. Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 2A, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
  3. Institute of Fluid Flow Machinery Polish Academy of Sciences, Fiszera 14, 80-231 Gdansk, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper illustrates a case study of fluid selection for an internal combustion engine heat recovery organic Rankine cycle (ORC) system having the net power of about 30 kW. Various criteria of fluid selection are discussed. Particular attention is paid to thermodynamic performance of the system and human safety. The selection of working fluid for the ORC system has a large impact on the next steps of the design process, i.e., the working substance affects the turbine design and the size and type of heat exchangers. The final choice is usually a compromise between thermodynamic performance, safety and impact on natural environment. The most important parameters in thermodynamic analysis include calculations of net generated power and ORC cycle efficiency. Some level of toxicity and flammability can be accepted only if the leakages are very low. The fluid thermal stability level has to be taken into account too. The economy is a key aspect from the commercial point of view and that includes not only the fluid cost but also other costs which are the consequence of particular fluid selection. The paper discusses various configurations of the ORC system – with and without a regenerator and with direct or indirect evaporation. The selected working fluids for the considered particular power plant include toluene, DMC (dimethyl carbonate) and MM (hexamethyldisiloxane). Their advantages and disadvantages are outlined.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Piotr Klimaszewski
Dawid Zaniewski
Łukasz Witanowski
Tomasz Suchocki
Piotr Klonowicz
Piotr Lampart
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper presents the results of energy and environmental evaluation of geothermal CHP plant. The variant of CHP plant based on Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) has been taken into consideration as the most favorable for the geothermal conditions prevailing in Poland. The existing geothermal well located in the city of Konin in Greater Poland (Wielkopolska) voivodship has been chosen as the case study. The conceptual design of CHP plant has been proposed and evaluated from energy and environmental point of view. The non-renewable primary energy consumption has been chosen as energy performance criterion. In the case of environmental performance carbon dioxide emission has been taken as evaluation criterion. The analysis has been performed for different operating conditions and three working fluids. The best energy performance can be spotted for working fluid R123, for which the reduction varies between 15200 and 11900 MWh/a. The working fluid R134a has a worse energy performance, which allows for the reduction of fossil fuels energy consumption in the range of 15000 and 11700 MWh/a. The total reduction of CO2 emission is the highest for working fluid R123: 5300 to 4150 MgCO2/a, the medium one for working fluid R134a: 5200 to 4100 MgCO2/a and the lowest for working fluid R227: 5000 to 4050 MgCO2/a. It has been shown that the construction of geothermal CHP plants based on Organic Rankine Cycle can be reasonable solution in Polish conditions. It is important concerning the need of reduction of fossil fuels primary energy consumption and carbon dioxide emission.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Bao, J. & Zhao, L. (2013). A review of working fluid and expander selection for organic Rankine cycle. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 24, pp. 325-342.
  2. Barbacki, A. & Pająk, L. (2017). Assessment of Possibilities of Electricity Production in Flash Geothermal System in Poland. Geomatics and Environmental Engineering. 11 (3), pp.17-29.
  3. Borsukiewicz-Gozdur, A. & Nowak, W. (2007). Comparative analysis of natural and synthetic refrigerants in application to low temperature Clausius-Rankine cycle. Energy, 32 (4), pp. 344-352.
  4. Dai, X. , Shi, L. & Qian, W. (2019). Thermal stability of hexamethyldisiloxane (MM) as a working fluid for organic Rankine cycle. International Journal of Energy Research, 43 (2), pp. 896– 899.
  5. Energy from renewable sources 2017, Statistics Poland 2019, Warsaw 2019.
  6. Energy Reports. Statistics Poland 2019, Warsaw 2018.
  7. Górecki W. (red). (2006). Atlas of geothermal resources of Mesozoic formations in the Polish Lowlands. AGH University of Science and Technology S. Staszica in Cracow, Cracow.
  8. Grabowska, W. (2019). Utilization of geothermal energy in co-generated heat and power production, Eng. Thesis, Poznan University of Technology, Poznań (in Polish).
  9. Guo, T., Wang, H. & Zhang, S. (2011). Comparative analysis of natural and conventional working fluids for use in transcritical Rankine cycle using low-temperature geothermal source. International Journal of Energy Research, 35 (6), pp. 530-544.
  10. Heberle, F. & Bruggemann, D. (2010). Exergy based fluid selection for a geothermal organic Rankine cycle for combined heat and power generation. Applied Thermal Engineering, 30 (11-12), pp. 1326-1332.www.geotermiakonin.pl/odwiert-geotermalny.html
  11. http://www.exergy-orc.com
  12. Jankowski, M., Borsukiewicz, A., Szopik-Depczyńska, K. & Ioppolo, G. (2019) Determination of an optimal pinch point temperature difference interval in ORC power plant using multi-objective approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 217, pp. 798-807.
  13. Kępińska, B. (2019). Geothermal Energy Use – country Update for Poland, 2016-2018; European Geothermal Congress 2019, Den Haag, The Netherlands, 11-14 June 2019.
  14. Legal Act of the Republic of Poland issued by Minister of Infrastructure and Development, on the methodology of evaluation of energy performance of buildings and building parts, Pos. 376/2015.
  15. Liu, L., Zhu, T., Wang, T. & Gao, N. (2019). Experimental investigation on the effect of working fluid charge in a small-scale Organic Rankine Cycle under off-design conditions. Energy, 174, pp. 664-677.
  16. Madhawa, H.D., Golubovic, M., Worek, W.M. & Ikegami, Y. (2007). Optimum design criteria for an organic Rankine cycle using low-temperature geothermal heat sources. Energy, 32 (9), pp. 1698-1706.
  17. Mahmoudi, A., Fazli, M. & Morad, M.R. (2018). A recent review of waste heat recovery by Organic Rankine Cycle. Applied Thermal Engineering. 143, pp. 660-675.
  18. Michałowski, M. (2011). Environmentally-friendly use of geothermal energy in Poland. Journal of the Polish Mineral Engineering Society, July-December 2011, pp. 1-9.
  19. Nowak, W. & Borsukiewicz-Gozdur, A. (2011). ORC power stations as the solution of low temperature heat source utilization. Clean Energy, 2, pp.32-35.
  20. Quoilin, S., Van Den Broek, M., Declaye, S., Dewallef, P. & Lemort, V. (2013). Techno-economic survey of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 22, pp. 168-186.
  21. Rettig, A., Lagler, M., Lamare, T., Li, S., Mahadea, V., McCallion, S. & Chernushevich, J. (2011). Application of Organic Rankine Cycles (ORC). World Engineers' Convention 2011, Geneva 4-9 September.
  22. Saleh, B., Koglbauer, G., Wendland M. & Fischer, J. (2007). Working fluids for low-temperature organic Rankine cycles, Energy, 32, pp. 1210-1221.
  23. Sauret, E. & Rowlands, A. S. (2011). Candidate radial-inflow turbines and high-density working fluids for geothermal power systems. Energy, 36, pp. 4460– 4467.
  24. Wang, D., Ling, X., Peng, H., Liu, L. & Tao L. (2013). Efficiency and optimal performance evaluation of organic Rankine cycle for low grade west heat power generation., Energy, 50, pp. 342-355.
  25. Wang, S., Liu, C., Liu, L., Xu, X. & Zhang, C. (2019). Ecological cumulative exergy consumption analysis of organic Rankine cycle for waste heat power generation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 218, pp. 543-554.
  26. World Energy Outlook 2019, IEA Annual report, iea.org/countries.
  27. Zanellato, L., Astolfi, M., Serafino, A., Rizzi, D. & Macchi, E. (2017). Field performance evaluation of geothermal ORC power plants with a focus on radial outflow turbines. IV International Seminar on ORC Power Systems, ORC2017 13-15 September 2017, Milano, Italy, pp.1-8.
  28. Zhang, H., Guan, X., Ding, Y. & Liu, C. (2018). Emergy analysis of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for waste heat power generation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, pp. 1207-1215
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Tomasz Maciej Mróz
1
ORCID: ORCID
Weronika Grabowska
1

  1. Poznań University of Technology, Poland

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more