How to search?
advanced search

Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 16
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:

The 8th General Congress of Polish Historians in Cracow in l958, and the Process of Destalinization of Polish Historiography

Andrzej Czyżewski
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2007-2008 | vol. 37-38 | 51-67
Keywords destalinization Polish historiography "thaw"
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The Author discusses the 8th General Congress of Polish Historians in Cracow in 1958 in the context of the so-called Polish "thaw".
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Andrzej Czyżewski

Where is the Public Sphere in Polish History?

Adrian Wesołowski
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2023 | tom 53 | 549-563
Keywords Habermas public sphere public opinion Polish historiography
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Jürgen Habermas’ theory of the public sphere has provoked a massive reaction in European historiography in the last thirty years. However, methodological debates driven by the new questions that it inspired in Germany, England, or France had no equivalent in Poland and more broadly in Eastern Europe. This essay suggests why this might have been the case and argues for the deeper engagement of Polish historians with the Habermasian theory. In the text, I reintro-duce the aims of the theory of the public sphere and look for the possible roots of its lacklustre reception among Polish historians in the idea about the Polish case’s supposed incompatibility with the course of modern history assumed by Habermas. I argue against this view, emphasising the flexibility and open‑endedness of the main Habermasian concepts, as well as underlining the necessity for a specifically Polish answer to Habermas’ theoretical enterprise. In the final part, I present the opportunities brought by adapting the theory to the Polish case, claiming that the original history of the Polish public sphere could be a prospective topic for both Polish historians and other historians of the public sphere.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Adrian Wesołowski
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Jagiellonian University

Social and Economic History, Integration of Science, and the Annales School. History by 'Historyka' in 1967–1995

Jakub Muchowski Rafał Swakoń
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2020 | tom 50 | 9-33 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2020.134795
Keywords Historyka Polish theory of history social and economic history postwar Polish historiography
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to partially capture the state of theoretical debate amongst Polish historians on their own discipline in the second half of 20th century. To achieve this we analyse the content of the first twenty five volumes of journal Historyka published in the period when Celina Bobińska was its editor-in-chief (1967–1995). We assume that Historyka – the only journal dedicated to the theory of history and history of historiography – was situated in the centre of exchanges on academic historical practices. We do not treat its content as a reflection of contemporary studies in the theory of history, but as a dominant position in the self-understanding of the discipline competing with other utterances. The paper is a reconstruction of this offer, which is composed of the definitions of subjects of historical studies, descriptions of productive methods, hierarchy of masters of historical writings and their influential books.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jakub Muchowski
ORCID: ORCID
Rafał Swakoń

One or multiple comparative methods? The comparatism in Polish mediaeval studies

Rafał Rutkowski
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 507-529 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142738
Keywords comparative method analogy methodology of history Polish historiography Georges Dumézil
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article is an attempt to look at the mediaevalist work of Jacek Banaszkiewicz through the prism of statements of other scholars using the comparative method (including M. Handelsman, M. Małowist, M. Tymowski, K. Modzelewski). The aim is to answer the question of whether there is a set of guidelines that every comparatist should follow. The specific issues discussed here include the role of difference and similarity in comparison, the notions of function, analogy and homology, geographical and chronological limitations of comparative studies, and the role of influence and reception.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Rafał Rutkowski
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii PAN

ProfessorJózef Andrzej Gierowski's Cooperation with the Wroclaw Academic Community after Moving to Cracow

Krystyn Matwijowski
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2007-2008 | vol. 37-38 | 69-76
Keywords Józef Andrzej Gierowski Polish historiography Wroclaw academic community after1965
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The Author analyzes Professor Józef Andrzej Gierowski's cooperation with the Wrocław academic community after this eminent Polish historian moved to Cracow in the years 1965-2007.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Krystyn Matwijowski

The Good and the Evil in Polish Historiography of the Saxon Times

Dariusz Dolański
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2004 | vol. 34 | 59-72
Keywords Saxon period in Polish history Polish historiography Catolicism Protestantism God and good
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article presents Polish historians and their work in the times of the Saxon kings of Poland. In particular the Author seeks an answer to the problem what was accepted and what the Polish authors of the first part of the 18th century condemned.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Dariusz Dolański

Tadeusz Kroński and Andrzej Walicki. Two Models of Philosophical Historiography

Ryszard Sitek
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2004 | vol. 34 | 45-58
Keywords 19th century philosophy Marxism Polish historiography Kroński T. Walicki A.
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In his article Author analyses two different approaches to Polish philosophy of the second half of the 19th century represented by Tadeusz Kroński and Andrzej Walicki.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ryszard Sitek

Thoughts of Józef Andrzej Gierowski on Polish culture and science in the 18th century

Joanna Orzeł
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2023 | tom 53 | 249-259 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2023.147371
Keywords Polish culture in 18th century Enlightenment Polish historiography academic historiography Józef Andrzej Gierowski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The issues of the history of culture and science of the eighteenth‑century Polish‑Lithuanian Commonwealth are rare in the works of Józef Andrzej Gierowski. This article analyses his views on these issues. He devoted most attention to the subject of the beginnings of the Enlightenment in Poland, joining a long scholarly discussion about it. He agreed that the precursors of the Enlightenment in Poland were already active in the 1740s, during the era of the Wettins’ rule. He pointed to educational reform, writing activity (Benedykt Chmielowski’s, the political and journalistic work of a number of writers) and publishing (especially of the Załuski brothers), and the development of periodicals as the three pillars on which reforms were carried out in the future – during the reign of Stanisław August Poniatowski. In addition, and just as importantly, he drew attention to methodological weaknesses concerning the study of intermediate periods, i.e. between the Baroque and the Enlightenment. He also pointed out the need for a comprehen-sive picture of the cultural history of the Polish‑Lithuanian Commonwealth in the 18 th century – proponents of both Sarmatian culture and Enlightenment thought.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Joanna Orzeł
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Uniwersytet Łódzki

Police of the second republic of Poland – between negation and glorification. Historiography and research postulates (the fate of police officers after September 1, 1939 and the conclusion of a series of three articles.)

Robert Litwiński
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2023 | tom 53 | 497-530 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2023.147383
Keywords Polish historiography Modern history State Police Silesian Voivodeship Police the Second Republic of Poland the fates of police personnel
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article concludes a series of three articles. The first two, published in 2022, were divided into time periods; 1) until 1989, and 2) since the 1990s. The present one discusses the issue of the fate of police officers after September 1, 1939, and includes a summary and research postulates. The timelines used in the series are not accidental, of course, as they had a significant impact on the way historiography devoted to public security organs was conducted in the interwar period. The literature that deals with pre‑war police is relatively rich in terms of quantity. However, it is worth examining it more carefully as several works raise a number of questions and doubts. Next to very good ones there are some that should not have been published. If we take a closer look at the style of narration in particular publications, we will notice that the authors in the vast majority limit themselves to describing and reporting facts, avoiding factual analysis. Many of the publications deviate from scientific standards, focusing their attention exclusively on creat-ing the preferred image of the public security organisation in a given period of time. Unfortu-nately, this is noticeable not only before 1989, but also later, when the negative image of the pre‑war police was replaced by its excessive glorification or even mythologisation. Despite the fact that more and more issues are raised and some of them are further developed, we still cannot consider the state of research that I am interested in as being satisfactory. The following issues still need to be highlighted and thoroughly investigated: 1) police biography; 2) issues of formation, socialisation and mentality; 3) the state of morale of the police corps; 4) participation in the Polish‑Soviet war; 5) participation in ensuring the internal security of the state; 6) police‑society relations, including the creation of the image of the police in culture texts; 7) police participation in the protection of state dignitaries; 8) international police co-operation; 9) the history of the police in the individual provinces; 10) women’s police service; 11) the functioning of police associations and cultural and educational activities; 12) war pre-parations; 13) the fate of police officers after September 1, 1939.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Robert Litwiński
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Uniwersytet Marii Curie‑Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

Between “picky historians” and “advocates of a new look at the native past” – the academy towards the People's History of Poland by Adam Leszczyński

Jolanta Kolbuszewska
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2023 | tom 53 | 577-592
Keywords history of historiography people’ss history eople’s turn in Polish historiography monograph reception
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Ludowa historia Polski. Historia wyzysku i oporu. Mitologia panowania (A People's History of Poland. A history of exploitation and resistance. The mythology of reign) (2020) by Adam Leszc-zyński, met with great interest, both in the academic community and wider reading circles. Re-viewed many times, it was the subject of discussion in scientific periodicals, opinion‑forming press, and on the Internet. In this article, based on published and shared online reviews, debates, discus-sions, etc., I will consider the reasons for the social resonance of the book. I will look at how it was received by members of the Academy (primarily historians and sociologists). Was Did the “new” approach to folk history proposed by Leszczyński meet with their acceptance? How did they evaluate the manner and degree of achievement of the goals set by the author? I will also be interested in assessments of methodological competences, scientific workshop technique and opi-nions on the benefits that science (mainly the humanities) has gained thanks to the author's findings.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jolanta Kolbuszewska
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Instytut Historii UŁ

French Historiography and Oskar Halecki

Anna Brzezińska
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2021 | tom 51 Spec. Iss. | 93-105 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2021.138880
Keywords Oskar Halecki Polish historiography French historiography Idea of East Central Europe history of Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Oskar Halecki’s reception in French historiography is one of the interesting examples of diffi-culties in understanding Polish historical thought in France. As one of the leading authors of the concept of East‑Central Europe in world historiography, a descendant of the Viennese aristoc-racy and an ambassador of Polish humanities in the League of Nations Committee on Intellec-tual Cooperation, he promoted the history of the countries of the region, considering their independent of Russia cultural specificity, deeply connected with the values of the Christian Europe. Meanwhile, after the Second World War, the socio‑economically oriented historiogra-phy of “Annales” was gaining more and more popularity in Paris – and in Warsaw itself ...
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Anna Brzezińska
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. University of Lodz, Łódź

Jerzy Topolski's History of Historiography

Rafał Stobiecki
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2021 | tom 51 | 365-409 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2021.138382
Keywords Jerzy Topolski history of historiography Polish historiography after 1945 methology of history theory of history
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aim of this article is to present Jerzy Topolski's vision of historiography and the ways of practicing it.
Go to article

Bibliography

Barycz, Henryk. „O nowe drogi historiografii polskiej”. Nauka i Sztuka 2 (1946): 324–336.
Biliński, Piotr. „Kilka uzupełnień na marginesie wydania «Historyki» Władysława Konopczyńskiego”.Klio Polska VIII (2016): 175–182.
Drozdowski, Marian. „Od badań regionalnych do syntez dziejów narodowych i historii powszechnej”. W Między historią a teorią. Refleksje nad problematyką dziejów i wiedzy historycznej, red. Marian Drozdowski, 6–20. Warszawa–Poznań: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1988.
Gałkowski, Piotr. Poznawanie dziejów czy wytwarzanie historii? Jerzego Topolskiego przemiany poglądów na uprawianie historii. Poznań: Fundacja im. Jerzego Kmity, 2019.
Gąsiorowska‑Grabowska, Natalia. „(rec.) Rutkowski, Janusz. Historia gospodarcza Polski, t. 1. Poznań: Księgarnia Akademicka, 1947”. Roczniki Dziejów Społeczno‑Gospodarczych II (1947).
Grabski, Andrzej F. „Przedmiot i modele badań historiograficznych”. W Andrzej F. Grabski, Kształty historii, 75–100. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Łódzkie, 1985.
International Handbook of Historical Science. Contemporary Research and Theory, red. Georg G. Iggers, Harold T. Parker. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1979.
Kula, Witold. Problemy i metody historii gospodarczej, wyd. II. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1983.
Między historią a teorią. Refleksje nad problematyką dziejów i wiedzy historycznej, red. Marian Drozdowski. Warszawa–Poznań: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1988.
Oblicza przeszłości, red. Wojciech Wrzosek. Bydgoszcz: Wydawnictwo Epigram, 2011.
Pomorski, Jan. „Historiografia tradycyjna, modernistyczna i postmodernistyczna”. W Współczesna dydaktyka historii, red. Jerzy Maternicki. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Juka, 2004.
Pomorski, Jan. „Jerzy Topolski jako homo metahistoricus”. W Jan Pomorski, Homo metahistoricus. Studium sześciu kultur poznających historię, 17–92. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie‑Skłodowskiej, 2019.
Pomorski, Jan. „Metodologia historii a historia historiografii”. W Jan Pomorski, Spoglądając w przeszłość. Studia i szkice metahistoryczne, 167–182. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii‑Curie Skłodowskiej, 2017.
Pomorski, Jan. „Metodologiczne «boje o historię»”. W Między historią a teorią. Refleksje nad problematyką dziejów i wiedzy historycznej, red. Marian Drozdowski, 28–38. Warszawa– Poznań: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1988.
Rutkowski, Tadeusz P. Nauki historyczne w Polsce 1944–1970. Zagadnienia polityczne i organizacyjne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, 2007.
Serejski, Marian H. Europa a rozbiory Polski. Studium historiograficzne. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1970.
Solarska, Maria. „O prawdzie w historiografii – pragmatycznie i idealistycznie”. Historia@-Teoria 3, cz. 1 (2017): 123–130.
Solarska, Maria, Maciej Bugajewski. „Historia historiografii jako historia prawdy. Dwugłos o podstawach teoretycznych historii historiografii Jerzego Topolskiego”. Historia@Teoria 3, 1 (2017): 123–130.
Stobiecki, Rafał. „Historia historiografii. Studium z dziejów tożsamości dyscypliny na przykładzie ośrodka łódzkiego”. Historia@Teoria 1 (2017): 108–121.
Stobiecki, Rafał. „Jerzy Topolski (1928–1998). Marksista, który miał odwagę różnić się od innych”. W Rafał Stobiecki, Historycy polscy wobec wyzwań XX wieku, 341–374. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Nauka i Innowacje, 2014.
Stobiecki, Rafał. „Między dogmatem ideologa a modernizacją. Marksizm Jerzego Topolskiego”. W Oblicza przeszłości, red. Wojciech Wrzosek, 53–68. Bydgoszcz: Wydawnictwo Epigram, 2011.
Stobiecki, Rafał. „O historyku z Poznania”. Nowe Książki 1 (1987): 118–120.
Stobiecki, Rafał. Historiografia PRL. Zamiast podręcznika. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, 2020.
Śreniowska, Krystyna. Kościuszko – bohater narodowy. Opinie współczesnych i potomnych 1794–1946. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1973.
Śreniowska, Krystyna. Kościuszko. Kształtowanie się poglądów na bohatera narodowego 1794– 1894. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1964.
Topolska, Maria D. „Bibliografia prac Jerzego Topolskiego za lata 1951–1987”. W Między historią a teorią. Refleksje nad problematyką dziejów i wiedzy historycznej, red. Marian Drozdowski, 66–133. Warszawa–Poznań: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1988.
Topolski, Jerzy. „Historia historiografii wobec wyzwań linguistic turn”. W Metodologiczne problemy syntezy historii historiografii polskiej, red. Jerzy Maternicki, 39–48. Rzeszów: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego, 1998.
Topolski, Jerzy. „Historiografia”. W Nowa Encyklopedia Powszechna PWN, t. 2, 763–765. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1995.
Topolski, Jerzy. „Idee przewodnie i metody historiografii renesansu i baroku”. W Europa i świat w początkach epoki nowożytnej, cz. 2, red. Antoni Mączak, 193–218. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Wiedza Powszechna, 1992.
Topolski, Jerzy. „Integracyjny sens materializmu historycznego”. Studia Metodologiczne 1 (1965): 5–22.
Topolski, Jerzy. Jak się pisze i rozumie historię. Tajemnice narracji historycznej, wyd. III. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie, 2008.
Topolski, Jerzy. Metodologia historii, wyd. II. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1973.
Topolski, Jerzy. Od Achillesa do Béatrice de Planissolles. Zarys historii historiografii. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Rytm, 1998.
Topolski, Jerzy. Teoretyczne problemy wiedzy historycznej. Antologia tekstów, wybrała, do druku przygotowała i wstępem opatrzyła Ewa Domańska. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Nauka i Innowacje, 2006.
Topolski, Jerzy. Teoria wiedzy historycznej. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie, 1983.
Wrzosek, Wojciech. „Jerzy Topolski 1928–1998”. W Wybitni historycy wielkopolscy, red. Jerzy Strzelczyk, 643–644. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie, 2010.
Wrzosek, Wojciech. „Szkic do portretu Jerzego Topolskiego”. W Jerzy Topolski, Varia historyczne, wstęp i dobór tekstów Wojciech Wrzosek, 9–30. Poznań: Poznańskie Towarzystwo Przyjaciół Nauk, 2010.
Zamorski, Krzysztof. „Potrzeby badań nad historią gospodarczą”. W Metodologiczne problemy syntezy historii historiografii polskiej, red. Jerzy Maternicki, 251–264. Rzeszów: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego, 1998.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Rafał Stobiecki
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Katedra Historii Historiografii i Nauk Pomocniczych Historii, Instytut Historii Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego

Police of the Second Republic of Poland – between negation and glorification. Historiography and research postulates. Part 1 – The state of research until 1989

Robert Litwiński
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 435-452 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142736
Keywords Polish historiography 1919–1989 Modern history State Police Police of the Silesian Voivodeship the Second Republic of Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article is part one of a discussion that attempts to examine the state of research on the history of the police in the Second Republic of Poland as presented in to‑date historiography. My interest includes literature concerning both the State Police and the Police of the Silesian Voivodeship, two organisations independent from each other. The 1989/1990 timeline is obviously not accidental, as it was of great significance for the way research on public security organs in the interwar period was conducted.
The recent 100‑year anniversary of the National Police created an excellent opportunity to assess the achievements pertaining to its history and the organisation modelled on it, i.e., the Police of the Silesian Voivodeship (PWŚl). Although their history has been the subject of several studies, it is worth taking a closer look at them trying to assess both the problems addressed and the quality of these studies. The author has made an attempt to carry out a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the existing literature, which is to lead to the identification of significant accomplishments, as well as to highlighting unexplored possibilities.
The author has chosen scientific publications as a basis for his analyses. Publications of an occupational nature, that is, manuals, specialist materials, handbooks, course books, etc., remain outside the area of the author’s interest.
The resulting analysis leads to the conclusion that it was not until the late 1980s that the one‑sided image of the pre‑war police, constructed through the discourse of repression against the “progressive” communist and workers’ movements, began to be abandoned. However, still dominating was the factual history, unfortunately not preceded by theoretical reflections.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Robert Litwiński
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Uniwersytet Marii Curie‑Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

Police of the Second Republic of Poland – between negation and glorification. Historiography and research postulates. Part 2 – The state of research since 1990

Robert Litwiński
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 453-506 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142737
Keywords Polish historiography since 1990 Modern history State Police Police of the Silesian Voivodeship the Second Republic of Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The present article is part two of the discussion attempting to assess the state of research on the history of the police in the Second Republic of Poland in historiography. This time I focus on the publications since 1990. I am interested in the literature concerning both the State Police and the Police of the Silesian Voivodeship, two independent organisations. The subsequent part deals with works published since 1990, and the last part is focused on the fate of police officers after September 1, 1939. This section also contains more complete summaries and research postulates. Obviously, the 1989/1990 timeline is not accidental, as it had a significant impact on the way historiography dealing with public security organs in the interwar period was conducted. The turn of the 1980s and 1990s was extremely fruitful for Polish historiography, including research on the history of the pre‑war police. On the one hand, access to archival materials became free and easy, thus opening new perspectives for researchers. This unrestricted possibility of using documents from the family archives of police officers and their family members was of great importance for gaining information about the everyday service of police officers. On the other hand, in some publications we notice a prevailing tendency to over‑heroise and sometimes even mythologise the pre‑war police, and this unfortunately is still happening today. All this coincided with the fact that there were an increasing number of authors dealing with the history of the police in the Second Republic, and consequently, the scope of research I was interested in had to expand.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Robert Litwiński
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Uniwersytet Marii Curie‑Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

The concept of the professional historian in academic discourse

Anna Brzezińska
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2021 | tom 51 | 41-61 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2021.138364
Keywords academic historiography historian interaction woman‑historian crisis of authority listening social role of history Polish historiography
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Reflecting on the question of the contemporary condition of historical thinking, focusing on the case study of Poland, I consider the causes of the crisis of authority of the professional historian in the modern information society, in particular the lack of interaction between academic historiography and society. Against this backdrop, I propose a reflection on a possible modifica-tion of the understanding of the historian's profession for the sake of dialogue with the "ordin-ary" recipient of history.
Go to article

Bibliography

Bachtin, Michaił. Problemy poetyki Dostojewskiego, przeł. Natalia Modzelewska. Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy, 1970.
Bauman, Zygmunt. Prawodawcy i tłumacze. Warszawa: Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii PAN, 1988.
Bloch, Marc. Pochwała historii, czyli o zawodzie historyka, przeł. Wanda Jedlicka, oprac. Witold Kula. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1960.
Bocheński, Józef Maria. Logika i filozofia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 1993.
Brzezińska, Anna M. Spór o średniowiecze. Z rozważań nad tożsamością kulturową Europy. Jacques Le Goff, Jerzy Kłoczowski, Aron Guriewicz. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, 2019.
Brzostek, Błażej. „Nachodźców zatopić! [PRAWICA PISZE HISTORIĘ DLA LUDU]”. Wolna Sobota. Magazyn Wyborczej. 23.01.2021. https://wyborcza.pl/magazyn/7,124059,26711230,nachodzcow‑zatopic‑prawica‑pisze‑historie‑dla‑ludu.html (dostęp: 26.05.2021).
Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary & Thesaurus https://dictionary.cambridge.org/pl/dictionary/english/meal‑ticket (dostęp: 1.04.2021).
Chudoba, Ewa, Anna Smywińska‑Pohl. Córki Nawojki: filozofki na Uniwersytecie Jagiellońskim 1897–1967. Kraków: Libron, 2017.
„Dawno, dawno czemu – odc. 2 – Estera Flieger, Maria Poprzęcka, Jerzy Giebułtowski, Adam Sitarek, Iza Terela”. Reset Obywatelski. 13.03.2021. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nGFVe8zvLQ, (dostęp: 6.04.2021).
Domańska, Ewa. Historie niekonwencjonalne. Refleksja o przeszłości w nowej humanistyce. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie, 2006.
„Evelyn Glennie – perkusistka nadsłysząca”. Jazzarium. https://www.jazzarium.pl/przeczytaj/ artyku%C5%82y/evelyn‑glennie‑perkusistka‑nads%C5%82ysz%C4%85ca (dostęp: 6.04.2021).
Foucault, Michel. „Podmiot i władza”, przeł. Jacek Zychowicz. Lewą Nogą 10 (1998). http://www.ekologiasztuka.pl/articles.php?article_id=67 (dostęp: 6.04.2021).
Gieysztor, Aleksander, „Rec. Polska Piastów”. Twórczość 12 (1960): [zakres stron]. Glennie, Evelyn. „How to truly listen”. TED 2003. https://www.ted.com/talks/evelyn_glennie_-how_to_truly_listen (dostęp: 22.02.2021).
Glennie, Evelyn, „The hearing essay”. 2011. http://www.evelyn.co.uk/Evelyn_old/live/hear-ing_essay.htm (dostęp: 22.02.2021).
Grabski, Andzej F. Zarys historii historiografii polskiej. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie, 2000.
„Wręczono Nagrodę Historyczną im. Kazimierza Moczarskiego”. Dzieje.pl. 11.12.2017. https://dzieje.pl/kultura‑i‑sztuka/wreczono‑nagrode‑historyczna‑im‑kazimierza‑moczarskiego (dostęp: 6.04.2021).
Interact or Die!, red. Joke Brouwer, Arjen Mulder. Rotterdam: V2_Lab for the Unstable Media 2007. https://v2.nl/archive/articles/intro‑interact‑or‑die (dostęp: 10.04.2021).
Jasienica, Paweł. Rzeczpospolita Obojga Narodów. Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Wydawniczy, 1967.
Kolbuszewska, Jolanta. Kobiety w drodze na naukowy Olimp. Akademicki awans polskich historyczek (od schyłku XIX wieku po rok 1989). Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, 2020.
Kolbuszewska, Jolanta. „Spór o profesjonalizm – czyli kto był historykiem w XIX stuleciu?”. W Między wolnością a zniewoleniem, red. Barbara Klassa, Leonid Zaszkilniak, 151–165. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, 2021.
Kowalska‑Pietrzak, Anna. „Polska Piastów Pawła Jasienicy z perspektywy dawnej i współczesnej mediewistyki”. W „Wolno każdemu mieć własny pogląd na historię, pod warunkiem, że się nie udaje i nie podrabia nauki”, red. Rafał Stobiecki, 155–176. Bydgoszcz: Oficyna Wydawnicza Epigram, 2019.
Lelewel, Joachim, „Jakim być ma historyk?”, Tygodnik Wileński 116,117 (1818): 338, 369.
Mintz, Steven. „Reimagining the Humanities for the 21st Century”., https://www.inside-highered.com/blogs/higher‑ed‑gamma/reimagining‑humanities‑21st‑century (dostęp: 6.04.2021).
Nowak, Andrzej, „Ankieta «Kwartalnika». Konteksty historyczne, formuła i pytania”. Kwar-talnik Historyczny r. XXVIII, nr 1 (2021): 5–15.
Nowak, Andrzej. O historii nie dla idiotów. Rozmowy i przypadki. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie, 2019.
Nowak, Andrzej, Jan Pomorski, Maciej Janowski. „Jakiej historii Polacy dziś potrzebują?”. Ale Historia. 16.09.2019. https://wyborcza.pl/alehistoria/7,121681,25183712,jakiej‑historii-‑polacy‑dzis‑potrzebuja.html (dostęp: 26.05.2021).
Kodeks etyki Polskiego Towarzystwa Historycznego przyjęty przez Zarząd Główny PTH 26 marca 2021 roku. http://pth.net.pl/o‑nas/kodeks‑etyki (dostęp: 26.05.2021).
Ratajczak, Mikołaj. „Kryzys doświadczenia i autorytetu. Esej filozoficzno‑polityczny”. Teksty Drugie 4 (2020): 296–316.
Serejski, Marian H. Historycy o historii 1918–1939, t. 2. Warszawa: Państwowe Wdawnictwo Naukowe, 1966.
Serejski, Marian H. Historycy o historii. Od Adama Naruszewicza do Stanisława Kętrzyńskiego 1775–1918, t.1. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 1963.
Sosa, Arturo SJ. „Generał jezuitów: to klerykalizm stworzył kryzys nadużyć w kościele”. Deon. https://deon.pl/magazyn/general‑jezuitow‑to‑klerykalizm‑stworzyl‑kryzys‑naduzyc,521073 (dostęp: 6.04.2021).
Stobiecka, Monika, Rafał Stobiecki. „W obronie autonomii historii w muzeum”. Teksty Drugie 4 (2020): 87–88.
Stobiecki, Rafał. „Historiografia na przełomie XX i XXI wieku. Krajobraz po bitwie”. http://www.pthlodz.uni.lodz.pl/teksty/historiografia.pdf (dostęp: 6.04.2021).
Stobiecki, Rafał. Historiografia PRL. Zamiast podręcznika. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, 2020.
Stobiecki, Rafał. Historycy polscy wobec wyzwań XX wieku. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Nauka i Innowacje, 2014.
Tetlock, Philip, Dan Gardner. Superprognozowanie. Sztuka i nauka prognozowania, przeł. Maciej Markiewicz. Warszawa: CeDeWu, 2017.
Wiślicz, Tomasz, „Historiografia polska 1989–2009. Bardzo subiektywne podsumowanie”. Przegląd Humanistyczny 5/6 (2010): 37–48.
Wójcik, Artur. Fantazmat Wielkiej Lechii. Jak pseudonauka zawładnęła umysłami Polaków. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Napoleon V, 2019.
„Young Historians for a New Europe. Part 1”. Piotr Budzyński.19.06.2020. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASmZ‑xwJxUs (dostęp: 10.04.2021).
„Young Historians for a New Europe. Part 2”. Piotr Budzyński.19.06.2020. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6HLgy_Cvt8&ab_channel=PiotrBudzy%C5%84ski (dostęp: 10.04.2021).
Zawojski, Piotr. Sztuka obrazu i obrazowania w epoce nowych mediów. Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa, 2012.
Zientara, Benedykt, „Rec. Polska Piastów”. Mówią wieki 10 (1960): 37–42.
Zysiak, Agata, Punkty za pochodzenie. Powojenna modernizacja i uniwersytet w robotniczym mieście. Kraków: Nomos, 2016.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Anna Brzezińska
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Uniwersytet Łódzki

Saxon era in the 20th century historical studies (from Władysław Konopczyński to Jacek Staszewski)

Jerzy Dygdała
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2023 | tom 53 | 193-210 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2023.147367
Keywords 20th century Polish historiography Saxon era political history Władysław Konopczyński Emanuel Rostworowski Jerzy Michalski Józef Andrzej Gierowski Jacek Staszewski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article discusses the development of studies on the epoch of the Polish‑Saxon Union (1697– 1763) in the 20th century (until 1990). Particular attention has been paid to the works of Władysław Konopczyński and his students (including Józef Feldman, Emanuel Rostworowski, Jerzy Michalski, Józef Andrzej Gierowski), as well as Mieczysław Skibiński and Jacek Stas-zewski. An attempt was made to identify the conditions influencing academic interest in the Saxon era, the gradual changes in research topics and their effects, and the varying intensity of this research. It was emphasised that they were largely concerned with political history.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jerzy Dygdała
1
  1. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla PAN

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more