Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 2
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to search the relations between the structure of the compressed expanded graphite – polymer – turbostratic carbon composites on successive stages of technological treatment and parameters describing the acoustic emission phenomena in these materials. The acoustic emission method can be used for measurements of changes in the structure and many different properties of materials. These investigations are a continuation of our earlier studies concerning physical, mechanical and chemical properties of porous composites created on the basis of a compressed expanded graphite matrix, obtained after successive technological procedures of impregnation, polymerization and carbonization of polyfurfuryl alcohol. The aim of this work was to investigate materials obtained at different levels of technological processing, thus with different densities, porosity, physical and chemical properties, by using the acoustic emission method. In compressed expanded graphite composites structures one can differentiate two basic directions: perpendicular to the bedding plane of graphite flakes and parallel to this one. The all presented results were obtained for the uniaxial strain applied in the direction perpendicular to the bedding plane of the composite structure. Analysis of acoustic emission parameters provides information on physical and chemical processes in these materials.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

A. Berdowska
J. Berdowski
F. Aubry
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The main aim of the study was to search for the relationship between the anisotropy of the structure of polyfurfuryl alcohol (PFA) – polymer/compressed expanded graphite (CEG)-matrix composites at subsequent stages of the technological process and characteristics of the acoustic emission (AE) descriptors. These composites, obtained after successive technological procedures of impregnation, polymerization, and carbonization, possess different structure, densities, porosity, and other physicochemical properties. In the structures of composites prepared on the basis of CEG, two basic directions can be distinguished: parallel to the bedding plane of graphite sheets and perpendicular to it. The measurements were carried out for the stress acting in these two main directions. The investigation has shown that the AE method enables the detection of anisotropy in the structure of materials. The results of the research show that all four of the acoustic emission descriptors studied in this work are sensitive to the technological stages of these materials on the one hand and their structure anisotropy on the other. Fourier analysis of the recorded spectra provides interesting conclusions about the structural properties of composites as well as a lot of information about the bonding forces between the carbon atoms of which the CEG matrix is composed and the PFA polymer or turbostratic carbon.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1.  A. Celzard, M. Krzesinska, D. Begin, J. Mareche, S. Puricelli, and G. Furdin, “Preparation, electrical and elastic properties of new anisotropic expanded graphite-based composites”, Carbon, vol. 40, pp. 557‒566, 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0008-6223(01)00140-3.
  2.  L. Shi, Z. Li, W. Yang, M. Yang, Q. Zhou, and R. Huang, “Properties and microstructure of expandable graphite particles pulverized with an ultra-high-speed mixer”, Powder Technol., vol. 170, no. 3, pp. 178‒184, 2006.
  3.  W. Zheng, and S. Wong, “Electrical conductivity and dielectric properties of PMMA/expanded graphite composites”, Compos. Sci. Technol., vol. 63, pp. 225–235, 2003.
  4.  J. Fu, H. Xu, Y. Wu, Y. Shen, and Ch. Du, “Electrical properties and microstructure of vinyl ester resin/compressed expanded graphite- based composites”, J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., vol. 31, pp. 3‒11, 2012, doi: 10.1177/0731684411431355.
  5.  E. Solfitia and F. Bertoa, “A review on thermophysical properties of flexible graphite”. Procedia Struct. Integrity, vol. 26, pp. 187‒198, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2020.06.022.
  6.  F. Uhl, Q. Yao, H. Nakajima, E. Manias, and Ch. Wilkie, “Expandable graphite/polyamide-6 nanocomposites”, Polym. Degrad. Stabil., vol. 89, pp. 70–84, 2005.
  7.  P. Xiao, M. Xiao, and K. Gong, “Preparation of exfoliated graphite/polystyrene composite by polymerization-filling technique”, Polymer, vol. 42, pp. 4813–4816, 2001.
  8.  G. Nanni et al., “Poly(furfuryl alcohol)-Polycaprolactone blends”, Polymers, vol. 11, pp. 1069‒1982, 2019, doi: 10.3390/polym11061069.
  9.  H. Wang and J. Yao, “Use of Poly(furfuryl alcohol) in the fabrication of nanostructured carbons and nanocomposites”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 45, pp. 6393–6404, 2006.
  10.  C. Burket, R. Rajagopalan, A. Marencic, K. Dronvajjala, and H. Foley, “Genesis of porosity in polyfurfuryl alcohol derived nanoporous carbon”, Carbon, vol. 44, pp. 2957–2963, 2006.
  11.  L. Pranger, G. Nunnery, and R. Tannenbaum, “Mechanism of the nanoparticle-catalyzed polymerization of furfuryl alcohol and the thermal and mechanical properties of the resulting nanocomposites”, Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 43, pp. 1139–1146, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j. compositesb.2011.08.010.
  12.  C. Guo, L. Zhou, and J. Lv, “Effects of expandable graphite and modified ammonium polyphosphate on the flame-retardant and mechanical properties of wood flour-polypropylene composites”, Polym. Compos., vol. 21, pp. 449–456, 2013.
  13.  L. Jin, W. Huanting, C. Shaoan, and C. Kwong-Yu, “Nafion-polyfurfuryl alcohol nanocomposite membranes for direct methanol fuel cells”, J. Memb. Sci., vol. 246, pp. 95–101, 2005.
  14.  W. Li, Ch. Han, W. Liu, M. Zhang, and K. Tao, “Expanded graphite applied in the catalytic process as a catalyst support”, Catal. Today, vol. 125, no. 3‒4, pp. 278‒281, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2007.01.035.
  15.  A. Celzard, J. Mareche, and G. Furdin, “Modeling of exfoliated graphite”, Prog. Mater. Sci., vol. 50, pp. 93‒179, 2005.
  16.  M.B. Shiflett and H.C. Foley, “Ultrasonic deposition of high-selectivity nanoporous carbon membranes”, Science, vol. 285, pp. 1902‒1905, 1999, doi: 10.1126/science.285.5435.1902.
  17.  M.B. Shiflett and H.C. Foley, “On the preparation of supported nanoporous carbon membranes”, J. Membr. Sci., vol. 179, pp. 275‒282, 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00513-5.
  18.  C. Song, T. Wang, X. Wang, J. Qiu, and Y. Cao, “Preparation and gas separation properties of poly(furfuryl alcohol)-based C/CMS composite membranes”, Sep. Purif. Technol., vol. 58, pp. 412‒418, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2007.05.019.
  19.  X. Yan, M. Hou, H. Zhang, F. Jing, P. Ming, and B. Yi, “Performance of PEMFC stack using expanded graphite bipolar plate”, J. Power Sourc., vol. 160, pp. 252‒257, 2006.
  20.  C. Du, P. Ming, M. Hou, J. Fud, Y. Fuc, X. Luo, Q. Shen, Z. Shao, and B. Yi, “The preparation technique optimization of epoxy/compressed expanded graphite composite bipolar plates for proton exchange membrane fuel cells”, J. Power Sourc., vol. 195, pp. 5312‒5319, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.03.005.
  21.  C. Du, et al., “Preparation and properties of thin epoxy/compressed expanded graphite composite bipolar plates for proton exchange membrane fuel cells”, J. Power Sourc., vol. 195, pp. 794‒800, 2010.
  22.  R. Wlodarczyk, Porous carbon materials for elements in low-temperature fuel cells”, Arch. Metal. and Mater., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 117‒120, 2015, doi: 10.1515/amm-2015-0019.
  23.  J. Berdowski, S. Berdowska, and F. Aubry, “Study of properties of expanded graphite-polymer porous composites by acoustic emission method”, Arch. Metall. Mater., vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 1331‒1336, 2013, doi: 10.2478/amm-2013-0169.
  24.  A. Berdowska, J. Berdowski, and F. Aubry, “Study of graphite – polymer – turbostratic carbon composites by acoustic emission method at perpendicular geometry”, Arch. Metall. Mater., vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 1287‒1293, 2018, doi: 10.24425/123803.
  25.  Z. Ranachowski, Measurements and analysis of the acoustic emission signal, Warsaw, IPPT PAN, 1996, [in Polish].
  26.  A. Zakupin, et al., Acoustic emission, ed., W. Sikorski, Rijeka, Shanghai, In Tech, 2012, pp. 173‒198.
  27.  M. Šofer, J. Cienciala, M. Fusek, P. Pavlíček, and R. Moravec, “Damage analysis of composite CFRP tubes using acoustic emission monitoring and pattern recognition approach”, Materials, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 786, 2021, doi: 10.3390/ma14040786
  28.  J. Zapała-Sławeta, and G. Świt, “Monitoring of the impact of lithium nitrate on the alkali-aggregate reaction using acoustic emission methods”, Materials, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 20‒28, 2019.
  29.  J. Li, F. Beall, and T. Breiner, “Analysis of racking of structural assemblies using acoustic emission”, in Advances in acoustic emission, ed., K. Ono, Nevada, USA, Acoustic Emission Working Group, 2007, pp. 202‒207.
  30.  G. Świt and J. Zapała-Sławeta, “Application of acoustic emission to monitoring the course of the alkali-silica reaction”, Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol. 68, pp. 169‒178, 2020, doi: 10.24425/bpasts.2020.131832.
  31.  I. Malecki, and J. Ranachowski, Acoustic emission, Warsaw, PASCAL, 1994, [in Polish].
  32.  A. Jaroszewska, J. Ranachowski, and F. Rejmund, “Destruction processes and material strength”, ed. J. Ranachowski, Warsaw, IPPT PAN, 1996, pp. 183, [in Polish].
  33.  A. Dode and M. Rao, “Pattern recognition of acoustic emission signals from PZT ceramics”, NDT.net, vol. 7, no. 9, 2002.
  34.  M. Raminnea, “Frequency analysis in sandwich higher order plates imposing various boundary conditions”, Int. J. Hydromechatronics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 63–76, 2019.
  35.  K. Ito and M. Enoki, “Real-time denoising of AE signals by short time Fourier transform and wavelet transform”, in Advances in acoustic emission, ed. K. Ono, Nevada, USA, Acoustic Emission Working Group, 2007, pp. 94‒99.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Sylwia Berdowska
1
Janusz Berdowski
1 2
Aubry Frederic
3

  1. Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czestochowa University of Technology, Al. Armii Krajowej 17, 42-200 Częstochowa, Poland
  2. Faculty of Science and Technology, J. Dlugosz University in Czestochowa, Al. Armii Krajowej 13/15, 42-200 Częstochowa, Poland
  3. Maitrise de Chimie-Physique, Université Henri Poincaré, Nancy, France

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more