Today’s manufacturing environment is highly uncertain, and it is continuously changing. It

is characterized by shorter life cycles of products and technologies, shorter delivery times, an

increased level of customization at the price of a standard product, increased product variety,

quality as well as demand variability and intense global competition. Academicians, as well as

practitioners, agree that uncertainty will continue to grow in the twenty-first century. To deal

with the uncertainties in demand variation and production capacity a manufacturing system

is required which can be easily reconfigured when there is a need at low cost. A reconfigurable

manufacturing system is such a type of system.

In the present work, the concept of the reconfigurable manufacturing system has been discussed

and reviewed. It has been compared with dedicated systems and flexible manufacturing

systems. Part family formation and barriers of reconfiguration also have been discussed.

This work is an attempt to contribute to the conceptual systematization of the reconfigurable

manufacturing system and reconfigurability by synthesizing the vast literature available after

a systematic review.

In mid-1992, Japanese consultant Yamada Hitoshi was tasked with modifying the production systems of Japanese companies as the existing configurations at manufacturing plants no longer satisfied unstable demands. He made improvements to the overall production system by dividing the long assembly lines into several short ones called cells or seru. Although of the advantages, it is still unclear about how to manage this new production system, and what variables really promoted the desired benefits. We identify in total 39 articles from 2004– 2020 about the progress of the seru production system, and we observe some possibilities to improve the effectiveness of this type of the production system. The first is the possibility of manufacturing the product in flexible sequence, in which the operations are independent among them. We show through the developed example that the makespan may be different. We noted when converting the in-line production system to one pure seru, the makespan tend to increase. Nevertheless, when analyzing the effectiveness of serus working concomitantly considering splitting the same lot, makespan and the cost may be reduced. And finally, when converting to one of pure serus, the performance may be similar to that obtained when serus working concomitantly.