Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 99
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In this paper the results of studies of polymeric binders on the example of the new BioCo2 binder, including the problem of its renewability, are presented. The results of structural studies (FT-IR) for the BioCo2 binder before and after crosslinking, and bending strength tests Rg u fresh and renewed cured molding sands with BioCo2 binder are discussed. The cross-linking binder and curring of moulding sand was carried out by physical agents (microwave radiation, temperature). On the basis of obtained results was shown that it is possible to restore the initial properties of the adhesive of BioCo2 binder. The initial properties of moulding sand can be achieved, after the cross-linking binders and after curing in the moulding sands with bioCo2 binder , by supplementing the moulding sand composition by the appropriate amount of water.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

B. Grabowska
A. Bobrowski
K. Kaczmarska
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article is devoted to the worldwide development of renewable energy in connection to the development of the socio-economic system and employment transformations. It is emphasized that the use of renewable energy sources is growing extremely fast globally, and it is generating positive socio-economic effects such as creating jobs worldwide. It is noted that in contrast to the situation in the field of traditional energy, the number of vacancies in the field of renewable energy continues to grow; photovoltaic, bioenergy, hydropower and wind forms of renewable energy are powerful employers in the world economy. It is noted that the increase in the number of people employed in the field of renewable energy is a consequence of the decentralized nature of the sector, as a result of which, renewable energy technologies produce more vacancies per unit of investment compared to traditional electricity generation technologies. It has been emphasized that the further development of renewable energy depends on the volume of investment in the creation of production facilities, which contributes to the further creation of jobs. Furthermore, it has been determined that the problem of renewable energy staffing is also extremely relevant for Ukraine. It is noted that the current system of training for this energy sector does not meet the long-term requirements; the increase of energy efficiency and the development of renewable energy transform the qualification requirements for employees, which requires the transformation of approaches to the training and development of employees.
Go to article

Bibliography


“Alternative” employment 2020. Is the personnel market keeping up with the changes in the energy sector? («Alternativnaya» zanyatost. Uspevayet li rynok kadrov za izmeneniyami v sektore energetiki?) [Online] http://economica.com.ua/solnechnaia_enerhyia/article/alternatyvnaia_zaniatost.html [Accessed: 2021-07-16] (in Russian).
AEEP 2021. Africa-EU Energy Partnership. [Online] https://africa-eu-energy-partnership.org/ [Accessed: 2021-07-31].
APN 2021. Asia-Pacific Network for Global Change Research. [Online] https://www.apn-gcr.org/ [Accessed: 2021-07-29].
BP 2021. BP Statistical Review of World Energy, Edition 2021. [Online] https://www.bp.com/en/global/ corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html [Accessed: 2021-08-17].
Deloitte 2018. International Renewable Energy Trends (Mezhdunarodnyye tendentsii v oblasti vozobnovlyayemykh istochnikov energii). Deloitte, Insights. Deloitte Development LLC. [Online] https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/ru/Documents/energy-resources/Russian/global-renewable-energy-trends.pdf [Accessed: 2021-08-08] (in Russian).
EC 2019. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions “The European Green Deal”. European Commission. Brussels, 11.12.2019, COM(2019) 640 final.
ESMAP 2021. Energy Sector Management Assistance Program. [Online] https://www.esmap.org/ [Accessed: 2021-07-30].
IRENA 2018. Transformation of the global energy system. Roadmap to 2050 (Preobrazovaniye globalnoy energeticheskoy sistemy. Dorozhnaya karta do 2050). [Online] https://www.irena.org/-/media/ Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2018/Apr/IRENA_Global_Energy_Transformation_2018_summary_ RU.pdf?la=en&hash=65D7B55F58A18EFA01D7F0FB0A74DA691F9C57F9 [Accessed: 2021- 07-21] (in Russian).
IRENA 2019. Renewable Energy Employment by Country. [Online]. https://www.irena.org/Statistics/View-Data-by-Topic/Benefits/Renewable-Energy-Employment-by-Country [Accessed: 2021-08-17].
IRENA 2020. Global Renewables Outlook: Energy Transformation 2050. [Online] https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2020/Apr/IRENA_Global_Renewables_Outlook_2020.pdf [Accessed: 2021-08-01].
IRENA 2020. Renewable energy and jobs. 2020 Annual Review (Vozobnovlyayemaya energetika i rabochiye mesta. Ezhegodnyy obzor za 2020 g.) [Online] https://irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/ 2020/Sep/Key_Findings_Jobs_Review_2020_RU.pdf?la=en&hash=DB49345C378E61214D- 197BA5FED1729AD36633F7 [Accessed: 2021-07-09] (in Russian).
IRENA 2020. Renewable Energy and Jobs. Annual Review 2020. IRENA. [Online]. https://www.irena.org/publications/2020/Sep/Renewable-Energy-and-Jobs-Annual-Review-2020 [Accessed: 2021-08-08].
IRENA 2020. The Post-Covid Recovery. [Online] https://irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2020/Jun/IRENA_Post-COVID_Recovery_2020.pdf [Accessed: 2021-07-30].
IRENA 2020. The quantity of jobs in the renewable energy sector continues to grow and totals 11.5 million worldwide (Kolichestvo rabochikh mest v sektore vozobnovlyayemykh istochnikov energii prodolzhayet rasti i naschityvayet 11.5 mln po vsemu miru). [Online] https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/ Agency/Press-Release/2020/Sep/PRESS-RELEASE--Jobs-Russian.pdf?la=en&hash=527ACF- 3DE078EC9EEAAACC452469DCB61861FDA4 [Accessed: 2021-07-14] (in Russian).
Kalinina et al. 2019 – Kalinina, S., Mikhaylushin, L., Korovchuk, Y. and Kushnarenko, O. 2019. Monitoring of International Labor Migration in the Context of the World Economy Labour Resources Providing Problems. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research (MDSMES) 99. Atlantis Press. 2019, pp. 389–392, DOI: 10.2991/mdsmes-19.2019.74.
Kalinina et al. 2020 – Kalinina, S., Lyndiuk, O. and Buchyk, V. 2020. Development of renewable energy in Ukraine in the context of ensuring public employment. Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 23(4), DOI: 10.33223/epj/130319.
Lanska, S. and Mishchenko, S. 2020. Theoretical And Methodological Aspects Of Labor Market Development Under The Influence Of Destabilizing Factors. Norwegian Journal of development of the International Science 50(3), pp. 38–45.
MEDREC 2021. Cooperation, efficiency, and Innovation for sustainability in the Mediterranean. [Online] https://www.medrec.org/about [Accessed: 2021-07-29].
REnKnow.Net 2021. Renewable Energy Research for Global Markets REnKnow.Net. [Online] http://renknow.net/ [Accessed: 2021-07-29].
SFERA 2021. Solar Facilities for the European Research Area. [Online] https://sfera.sollab.eu/ [Accessed: 2021-07-29].
Tkachuk, Y. 2020. Personnel for the power industry: what do power companies think about professional education in Ukraine (Kadry dlya energetiki: chto dumayut energokompanii o professionalnom obrazovanii v Ukraine). [Online] https://kosatka.media/category/blog/news/kadry-dlya-energetiki-chto-dumayut-energokompanii-o-professionalnom-obrazovanii-v-ukraine [Accessed: 2021-08-09] (in Russian).
TNA 2021. Technology Needs Assessment – UNEP DTU Partnership. [Online] https://tech-action.unepdtu.org/ [Accessed: 2021-07-30].
UARE 2019. Renewable energy: a chance for employment growth in Ukraine (Vozobnovlyayemaya energetika: shans dlya rosta zanyatosti v Ukraine) [Online] https://uare.com.ua/ru/novyny/556-vozobnovlyaemaya-energetika-shans-dlya-rosta-zanyatosti-v-ukraine.html [Accessed: 2021-07-21] (in Russian).
US Office of Electricity 2020. Grid Modernization and Smart Grid. [Online] https://www.energy.gov/oe/activities/technology-development/grid-modernization-and-smart-grid [Accessed: 2021-07-21].
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Svitlana Kalinina
1
ORCID: ORCID
Olena Lyndiuk
1
ORCID: ORCID
Vasyl Savchenko
1
ORCID: ORCID
Valeriya Podunay
1
ORCID: ORCID
Svitlana Lanska
1
ORCID: ORCID
Eduard Savchenko
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Theoretical and Applied Economics Department, Ukrainian State Employment Service Training Institute, Ukraine
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article studies the implications of the Fourth Energy Package and relevant EU Directives for households and explores their potential benefits in Ukraine. Understanding the effects of energy policies on the residential sector is crucial for promoting sustainability amidst global energy and climate challenges. Methods of descriptive legal studies and investment analysis are used to examine the primary EU legislation on renewable energy communities and citizens’ groups, focusing on their applicability to homes and renewable energy cooperatives. The analysis of Ukraine’s experiences with the adoption of green power and incentives have revealed challenges for small solar home installations operating without the feed-in tariff. Introducing net-billing makes projects unfeasible without such a tariff, and even selling electricity through aggregators on the intraday market does not help. Consequently, the payback period for small installations with batteries becomes unreasonably long (exceeding twenty-five years), while larger facilities have shorter payback termsolytechnic Institute, Ukraine (fifteen to seventeen years). These findings highlight the need for careful consideration of household green-power policies. Implementing the Fourth Energy Package in Ukraine requires measures to address the financial feasibility of small solar installations, particularly those lacking feed-in tariff support. Expanding legislative provisions to include consumers of green power, especially those in multi-apartment buildings, can enhance their participation in the electricity producers’ market. Moreover, raising household electricity prices may be necessary to support sustainable energy practices. Overall, this study underscores the importance of evidence-based policymaking for successful power transitions in homes and the broader energy sector.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Galyna Trypolska
1
ORCID: ORCID
Uliana Pysmenna
2
ORCID: ORCID
Iryna Sotnyk
3
ORCID: ORCID
Tetiana Kurbatova
3
ORCID: ORCID
Olena Kryvda
2
ORCID: ORCID

  1. SO Institute for Economics and Forecasting, UNAS, Ukraine
  2. National Technical University of Ukraine Ihor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute, Ukraine
  3. Sumy State University, Ukraine
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper presents an analysis of the influence of the energy generated from renewable sources on an improvement in the energy efficiency of public utility building and households. It also presents the current state of the technologies for the production of electricity from renewable sources, as well as their share in the national power supply system. The conducted analysis concerns both micro, as well as large systems generating electricity. Systems generating power from renewable sources are gaining in popularity. With an increasing awareness in the society of the beneficial influence that renewable power generating systems have on the environment, as well as the support in form of various programs offering subsidies for the construction of new systems, power generation from renewable sources is becoming increasingly popular and common. Although the renewable energy systems are still not widely considered to be a profitable solution, systems using renewable sources of energy are positively perceived and treated as a new trend in the construction of multi or single-family residential buildings. The increasing share of the renewable energy in the national power supply system significantly reduces the demand for energy produced from conventional sources. This obviously translates into a reduced consumption of primary energy, for example, fossil fuels, and, in turn, leads to the reduced exploitation of natural resources, thus contributing to the protection of the natural environment. A reduced consumption of fossil fuels also means a significant reduction in environmental pollution during their processing into electricity or heat. Actions aiming at improving energy efficiency and reducing final energy consumption are being undertaken by many countries all over the world, and by the European Union. In 2012, the European Parliament and the Council issued Directive 2012/27/EU obliging the Member States to initiate actions aiming at a reduction in the consumption of final energy by 1.5% a year. The paper presents the current status of generation of energy from renewable sources during the last 13 years. The ways for using energy from the renewable sources to improve the energy efficiency of facilities were also discussed.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Sławomir Sowa
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

There are many financial ways to intensify the construction of new renewable energy sources installations, among others: feed in tariff, grants. An example of photovoltaic grant support in Poland is the “Mój Prąd” [My Electricity] program created in 2019. This program, with a budget of PLN 1 billion, is intended for households in which installations with a capacity range of 2–10 kWp have been installed. During its first edition 27,187 application were submitted. Over 98% of installations cost less than PLN 6,000/kWp. The total installed capacity is 151.3 MWp, which gives the average amount of co-funding per unit of power at the level of PLN 884.7/kWp. The average power of the installation on the national scale is 5.57 kWp, the indicator per 1000 inhabitants is 3.94 kWp, and per unit of area is 0.484 kWp/km2. These installations will produce around 143.5 GWh of electricity annually, contributing to the reduction of CO2 emissions by approximately 109,800 Mg per year. Most applications came from the Silesian Province (3855), which translated into the largest installed capacity of 21.82 MWp, as well as 4.81 kWp/1000 inhabitants and 1.77 kWp/km2 (over 3 times higher than the average in Poland). The installed capacity in the individual province was closely correlated with the population of the province (correlation coefficient – 0.95), while the installed capacity indicator per 1,000 inhabitants with insolation (0.80). The highest power ratio per 1000 inhabitants was achieved in the Podkarpackie Province and amounted to 5.05, and the lowest in the West Pomeranian Province (2.41).

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Piotr Olczak
ORCID: ORCID
Dominika Matuszewska
ORCID: ORCID
Dominik Kryzia
ORCID: ORCID
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The energy efficiency of photovoltaic modules is one of the most important aspects in energetic and economic aspects of the project related to system installations. The efficiency of modules and the electricity produced by photovoltaic conversion in solar modules is affected by many factors, both internal, related to the module structure itself and its technical and external factors related to the energy infrastructure, which includes: cabling, inverters, climate conditions prevailing at the micro-installation location and the orientation and angle of inclination of the solar modules. The installation of photovoltaic modules should be preceded by an energy efficiency analysis, which will help to indicate the optimal solution adapted to the given conditions. The article presents a comparative analysis of the amount of energy produced under real and simulated conditions. Analyzes were made on the basis of research carried out in the Wind and Solar Energy Laboratory located at the AGH University of Science and Technology, data from solar irradiation data-bases and computer software for estimating energy resources. The study examined the correlation of the solar irradiation on the modules and the amount of electricity generated in the photovoltaic module. The electricity produced by the module was compared under real conditions and simulated based on two sources of data. The comparison and analysis of the amount of energy of the module were also made, taking simulated different angles of the module’s inclination into account.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Bartosz Soliński
Monika Stopa
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aim of the article is to discuss and assess the diversification of renewable energy sources consumption in European Union member states. The time scope covers 2005 and 2015. The data comes from Eurostat. The analysis was based on synthetic indicators – using a non-standard method. Synthetic indicators were assessed based on three simple features such as: the share of renewable energy in energy consumption in 2015, the difference between the share of renewable energy in energy consumption in 2015 and in 2005 (in percentage points), deficit/surplus in the 2020 target reached in 2015 (in percentage points). The European Union member states were divided into four diversified group in terms of renewable energy sources consumption (first class – a very high level, second class – quite a high level, third class – quite a low level, fourth class – a very low level). Then the divided groups were analyzed according to the share of renewable energy sources in the primary production of renewable energy and the consumption of individual renewable energy sources. During the research period renewable energy consumption increased in the European Union, but individual member states are characterized by a diverse situation. The type of energy used depends largely on national resources. The countries of Northern Europe are characterized by a greater share of renewable energy sources in consumption. Biomass is the most popular renewable source of energy in the European Union. Depending on the conditions of individual countries – it is agricultural and forest biomass.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Luiza Ossowska
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Formation the local identity in the “thematic” Rural Renewal, The article aims to determine the main conditions for the development of rural thematic areas in the context of Rural Renewal. Against this background, the authors attempt to explain the mechanisms governing the discussed process and their effects. In view of the above, the focus was on presenting mechanisms for the development of processes that lead to the flowering of this idea (an anatomy of success – the case of the village of Sierakowo Sławieńskie) and those that slow down or completely limit this development (anatomy of failure – the case of the village of Lubcza).

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marcin Wójcik
Pamela Jeziorska-Biel
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The future and development of energy is one of the most important problems in both domestic and global politics. Limiting the use of fossil fuels in the energy sector results from new legal conditions related to the protection of the natural environment. These changes require the development of a new energy strategy, taking the limits of greenhouse gas emissions in the European Union and the requirements of the Community energy policy into account. One of the documents affecting the structure of Poland’s energy mix is the Directive on renewable energy sources (2009/28/EC). Poland has committed to achieving the goal of a 15% share of energy from renewable sources (RES) in gross final energy consumption by 2020. Current changes in Polish RES support systems – in particular the transition from the system of green certificates to auctions for green energy – may threaten the achievement of the above-mentioned goal. The article analyzes whether Poland will meet renewable energy obligations by 2020 under the current conditions. In addition, the article presents current energy consumption in the world and in the country, legal conditions taken into account when creating the country’s energy mix and forecasts of renewable energy demand.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Anna Manowska
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In spite of technological, logistic and economic difficulties, interest in renewable energy sources in the world is consistently increasing. This trend is also observed in Poland, mainly due to the urgent need to tackle the problem of climate change, which is caused by the increasing concentration of gaseous pollutants in the atmosphere. The paper presents a short script of the issue of estimating renewable energy resources in Poland in the context of creating local low carbon economy plans at the level of municipalities/counties where RES sources should be taken into account. The author proposed an individual approach to estimate the potential of RES, taking the local conditions and the short characteristics of the small and medium companies sector in Poland into account. These companies have a great application potential to increase the share of renewable energies and to improve energy efficiency in their business. The actions, which are taken by the Ministry of Energy in the field of civil energy development, enhancing local energy security and the sustainable development of renewable energy resources support the development of energy clusters covering one district or five municipalities. In the article, the author presents data on the number of companies possessing a concession for generating electricity in RES installations in the power range from 40 kW to 200 kW. These companies can largely be the nucleus for creating a local cluster in which microgrids will be a key element.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Tomasz Mirowski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Given the importance of renewable energy as it provides alternative energy sources over the traditional fossil fuel that is environmentally friendly, clean and renewable, this research aims to explore scholarly articles and books that present and investigate the challenges and barriers facing the implementation of renewable energy sources in Libya where the social, cultural, financial and awareness aspects are an important consideration against renewable energy. This study contains a review of all relevant, peer-reviewed, and published articles from journals, websites, books, conference proceedings and bulletins. An extensive literature review was carried out with the aim of researching renewable energy in Libya. This was done to take a realistic perspective of the community and the knowledge services accessible. The review of literature has shown that further renewables energy research remains necessary as the current conditions of the energy sector in Libya need to be examined to understand the challenges and difficulties to introduce renewable energy within competent authorities and businesses are examined in accordance with their managers. This indicates the need to conduct various studies in Libya to explore the various challenges, mostly financial and technological, that face the purposeful implementation of renewable energy resources in Libya. Additionally, the level of awareness and culture perception of the use of renewable energy is an important aspect to be considered as reported as barriers affecting the implementation of renewable energy in various parts of the world.
Go to article

Bibliography

2020 Predictions for the Global Economy and Markets 2020. [Online] https://www.investopedia.com/2020-predictions-for-the-global-economy-markets-and-investors-4780156 [Accessed: 2020-10-23].
Abdullahi, D. et al. 2017. Solar Energy Development and Implementation in Nigeria: Drivers and Barriers. DOI: 10.18086/swc.2017.16.01.
Adan H. et al. 2018 – Adan, H., Fuerst, F., Kavarnou, D. and Singh, R. 2018. Me or my house? Investigating the relative importance of household and dwelling characteristics for household energy consumption. [Online] https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3254320 [Accessed: 2020- 06-24].
Ahadzie, D.K. et al. 2009. Towards developing competency-based measures for project managers in mass house building projects in developing countries. Construction Management and Economics 27(1), pp. 89–102, DOI: 10.1080/01446190802621028.
Ajredi et al. 2017 – Ajredi, M.A.S., Ayedh, A.M.A. and Haron, M.S. 2017. The Relationship between Real Exchange Rate and Components of the Broader Measure of Money Supply: An Analytical Study on the Libyan Economy. Journal of Insurance and Financial Management 3(3).
Al-Hamamre, Z. et al. 2017. Wastes and biomass materials as sustainable-renewable energy resources for Jordan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. Elsevier, 67, pp. 295–314.
Alweheshi, S. et al. 2019. Photovoltaic solar energy applications in Libya: a survey’. The 10th International Renewable Energy Congress (IREC), pp. 1–6, DOI: 10.1109/IREC.2019.8754527. [Online] https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/Shoroug-Alweheshi-2155953241 [Accessed: 2020-12- 05].
Ansari, M.F. et al. 2013. Analysis of barriers to implement solar power installations in India using interpretive structural modeling technique. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews 27, pp. 163–174.
Armaroli, N. and Balzani, V. 2007. The future of energy supply: challenges and opportunities. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 46(1–2), pp. 52–66.
Atadashi et al. 2012 – Atadashi, I.M., Aroua, M.K., Abdul Aziz, A.R. and Sulaiman, N.M.N. 2012. The effects of catalysts in biodiesel production: A review. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 19(1), pp. 14–26, DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2012.07.009.
Badi, I.A. et al. 2018. A grey-based assessment approach to the site selection of a desalination plant in Libya. Grey Systems: Theory and Application, DOI: 10.1108/GS-01-2018-0002.
Blanchard, C.M. 2016. Libya: Transition and US policy. Washington United States: Congressional Research Service. [Online] https://sgp.fas.org/crs/row/RL33142.pdf [Accessed: 2020-09-22].
Bolesta, A. 2018. Myanmar-China peculiar relationship: Trade, investment and the model of development. Journal of International Studies 11(2), pp. 23–36.
Bussar, C. et al. 2014. Optimal allocation and capacity of energy storage systems in a future European power system with 100% renewable energy generation. Energy Procedia 46, pp. 40–47, DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.01.156.
Capasso, M. 2020. The war and the economy: the gradual destruction of Libya. Review of African Political Economy 47, pp. 1–23.
CBL 2009. Economic Bulletin for the Fourth Quarter of 2009. Tripoli, Libya.
Central Bank of Libya 2005. [Online] https://cbl.gov.ly/en/[Accessed: 2021-02-20].
CIA 2016. Central Intelligence Agency-The World Factbook.
Collotta, M. et al. 2018.Wastewater and waste CO2 for sustainable biofuels from microalgae. Algal research 29, pp. 12–21.
Deigaard, R. and Nielsen, P. 2018. Wind generation of waves: Energy and momentum transfer – An overview with physical discussion. Coastal Engineering 139, pp. 36–46.
Doğanalp, N. 2018. The nexus between renewable energy and sustainable development: a panel data analysi̇s for selected eu countries. Journal of Social And Humanities Sciences Research (JSHSR) 5(29), pp. 3966–3973, DOI: 10.26450/jshsr.884.
Etelawi et al. 2017 – Etelawi, A.M., Blatner, K.A. and McCluskey, J. 2017. Crude Oil and the Libyan Economy. International Journal of Economics and Finance 9(4), pp. 95–104.
Feron, S. 2016. Sustainability of off-grid photovoltaic systems for rural electrification in developing countries: A review. Sustainability 8(12), pp. 1–26, DOI: 10.3390/su8121326.
GPCEWGL 2008. The Libyan General people’s Committee for Electricity, Water and Gas. Annual Report. Tripoli – Libya.
GPCFAAL 2007. The General People’s Committee of The Financial Audit Authority. Tripoli – Libya.
He, Z.X. et al. 2018. Factors that influence renewable energy technological innovation in China: A dynamic panel approach. Sustainability 10(1), DOI: 10.3390/su10010124.
Herbert, G.M.J. and Krishnan, A.U. 2016. Quantifying environmental performance of biomass energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 59, pp. 292–308.
Herington, M.J. et al. 2017. Rural energy planning remains out-of-step with contemporary paradigms of energy access and development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 67, pp. 1412–1419.
Van Horne, C. and Dutot, V. 2017. Challenges in technology transfer: an actor perspective in a quadruple helix environment. The Journal of Technology Transfer 42(2), pp. 285–301.
Jolly, W.M. et al. 2015. Climate-induced variations in global wildfire danger from 1979 to 2013. Nature Communications. Nature Publishing Group, 6(May), pp. 1–11, DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8537.
Kassem et al. 2020 – Kassem, Y., Çamur, H. and Aateg, R.A.F. 2020. Exploring Solar and Wind Energy as a Power Generation Source for Solving the Electricity Crisis in Libyax. Energies 13(14), p. 3708.
Khalifa et al. 2019 – Khalifa, R., Dabab, M. and Barham, H. 2019. A preliminary strategic framework for enhancing the sustainability of international technology transfer: The case of Libya. PICMET 2019 – Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology: Technology Management in the World of Intelligent Systems, Proceedings, 1–9, DOI: 10.23919/PICMET.2019.8893662.
Khalil, A. and Asheibe, A. 2015. The chances and challenges for renewable energy in Libya. The Proceedings of the Renewable Energy Conference (November 2015), pp. 1–6.
Khan, K.A. et al. 2018. Renewable energy scenario in Bangladesh. IJARII 4(5), pp. 270–279.
Khare et al. 2013 – Khare, V., Nema, S. and Baredar, P. 2013. Status of solar wind renewable energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 27(1), pp. 1–10.
Khare et al. 2017 – Khare, Vikas, Nema, S. and Baredar, P. 2013. Status of solar wind renewable energy in India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 27, pp. 1–10, DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.06.018.
Khojasteh et al. 2016 – Khojasteh, D., Khojasteh, D. and Kamali, R. 2016. Wave Energy Absorption by Heaving Point Absorbers at Caspian Sea. 24th Annual International Conference on Mechanical Engineering- ISME. Yazd, Iran (April). 156 157
Komoto, K. et al. 2009. Energy from the desert: Very Large scale photovoltaic systems: Socio-economic, financial, technical and environmental aspects. Energy from the Desert: Very Large Scale Photovoltaic Systems: Socio-economic, Financial, Technical and Environmental Aspects, pp. 1–190, DOI: 10.4324/9781849770064.
Kumar, D. and Katoch, S.S. 2014. Sustainability indicators for run of the river (RoR) hydropower projects in hydro rich regions of India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 35, pp. 101–108.
Luthra, S. et al. 2015. Barriers to renewable/sustainable energy technologies adoption: Indian perspective. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews 41, pp. 762–776.
Martinez-Manuel, L. 2021. Flux solar simulator for the development of thesis that to obtain the degree of doctor of Science (optics) Presents: Leopoldo Martínez-Manuel (April).
Mercer, N. 2016. Barriers to renewable energy development in newfoundland and labrador: a case study of wind energy applying the ‘aktesp’ framework for analysis.
Mirkouei, A. et al. 2017. A mixed biomass-based energy supply chain for enhancing economic and environmental sustainability benefits: A multi-criteria decision making framework. Applied Energy 206(May), pp. 1088–1101, DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.001.
Mohamed, A.M.A. 2016. Investigation into the feasibility of the utilisation of renewable energy resources in Libya (Doctoral dissertation, Nottingham Trent University).
Mohamed et al. 2019 – Mohamed, A.M.A., Elabar, S.M., Shakmak, B.H.M. and Al-Habaibeh, A. 2019 Exploring the sustainable economy and energy for Libya’s future. Nottingham Trent University: Publications. [Online] http://irep.ntu.ac.uk/id/eprint/29037/ [Accessed: 2021-03-05].
Mohamed et al. 2017 – Mohamed, A.M.A., Al-Habaibeh, A. and Abdo, H. 2016. Future prospects of the renewable energy sector in Libya. Conference: Sustainable Built Environment. [In:] SBE16 Dubai Conference, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
Mohamed, O.A. and Masood, S.H. 2018. A brief overview of solar and wind energy in Libya: Current trends and the future development. [In:] IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 377(1), DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/377/1/012136.
Murshed, M. 2020. Are Trade Liberalization policies aligned with Renewable Energy Transition in low and middle income countries? An Instrumental Variable approach. Renewable Energy 151, pp. 1110– –1123, DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.106.
Nasar, M. and Elzentani, H. 2016. Smart Roads to Generate Energy in Libya: Survey. Environment & Ecology 34(3A), pp. 1088–1092.
Nengroo et al. 2018 – Nengro, S.H., Kamran, N.A., Ali, M.U., Kim, D.-H., Kim, M.-S., Hussain, A. and Kim, H.-J. 2018. Dual battery storage system: An optimized strategy for the utilization of renewable photovoltaic energy in the United Kingdom. Electronics 7(9), p. 177. OPEC 2016. [Online] https://www.opec.org/opec_web/en/search.jsp? [Accessed: 2020-06-27].
Otman, W. and Karlberg, E. 2007. The Libyan economy: economic diversification and international repositioning. Springer Science & Business Media, DOI: 10.1007/3-540-46463-8.
Paravantis et al. 2018 – Paravantis, J., Mihalakakou, G., Stigka, E. and Evanthie, M. 2018. Social acceptance of renewable energy projects: A contingent valuation investigation in Western Greece. Renewable Energy 123, pp. 639–651.
Patil, D. 2018. Sustainable Bio-Energy Through Bagasse Co-Generation Technology: a Pestel Analysis of Sugar Hub of India, Solapur. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research 5(12), pp. 661–669.
Piwowar, A. and Dzikuć, M. 2019. Development of renewable energy sources in the context of threats resulting from low-altitude emissions in Rural Areas in Poland: A review. Energies 12(18), DOI: 10.3390/en12183558.158
Pueyo, A. 2018. What constrains renewable energy investment in Sub-Saharan Africa? A comparison of Kenya and Ghana. World Development 109, pp. 85–100.
Le Quéré, C. et al. 2017. Global_Carbon_Budget. Earth System Science Data (November).
Reddy, S. and Painuly, J.P. 2004. Diffusion of renewable energy technologies – barriers and stakeholders’ perspectives. Renewable Energy 29(9), pp. 1431–1447. Renewable energy statistics 2020. Online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title =Renewable_energy_statistics.
Seetharaman et al. 2019 – Seetharaman, A., Krishna Moorthy, M. and Nitin, P. 2019. Breaking barriers in deployment of renewable energy. Heliyon. Elsevier Ltd. 5(1), DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01166.
Sharma, A.K. and Thakur, N.S. 2017. Energy situation, current status and resource potential of run of the river (RoR) large hydro power projects in Jammu and Kashmir: India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 78, pp. 233–251.
Shibin et al. 2016 – Shibin, K.T., Gunasekaran, A., Papadopoulos, T., Dubey, R., Singh, M. and Fosso Wamba, S. 2016. Enablers and barriers of flexible green supply chain management: A total interpretive structural modeling approach. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management 17(2), pp. 171–188.
Sindhu et al. 2016 – Sindhu, S., Nehra, V. and Luthra, S. 2016. Identification and analysis of barriers in implementation of solar energy in Indian rural sector using integrated ISM and fuzzy MICMAC approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 62, pp. 70–88.
Solangi et al. 2019 – Solangi, Y.A., Tan, Q., Mirjat, N.H., Valasai, G.D., Khan, M.W.A. and Ikram, M. 2019. An integrated Delphi-AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approach toward ranking and selection of renewable energy resources in Pakistan. Processes 7(2), pp. 1–31, DOI: 10.3390/pr7020118.
Strantzali, E. and Aravossis, K. 2016. Decision making in renewable energy investments: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 55, pp. 885–898, DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.021.
Suckling, J.H. and Frasier, J.T. 2015. Adoption of the paris agreement. Experimental Mechanics 8(11), pp. 513–519, DOI: 10.1007/BF02327128.
Suman, S.K. and Ahamad, J. 2018. Solar energy potential and future energy of India: an overview. International Journal of Engineering Science, p. 17575.
Suzuki et al. 2010 – Suzuki, M., Kehdy, B.O. and Jain, S. 2010. Identifying barriers for the implementation and the operation of biogas power generation projects in Southeast Asia: An analysis of clean development mechanism projects in Thailand. Economics and Management Series Working Paper, EMS–2010–20, International University of Japan, Japan.
Tomar et al. 2017 – Tomar, V., Tiwari, G. and Norton, B. 2017. Solar dryers for tropical food preservation: Thermophysics of crops, systems and components. Solar Energy 154, pp. 2–13.
Trutnevyte, E. et al. 2016. Energy scenario choices: Insights from a retrospective review of UK energy futures. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 55, pp. 326–337, DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.067.
UNFCCC 2020. [Online] https://unfccc.int/climate-action/introduction-climate-action [Accessed: 2020-12-08]. U.S. Energy Information Administration 2019. [Online] https://www.eia.gov/ [Accessed: 2020-12-08].
Worldometers 2016a. [Online] https://www.worldometers.info/oil/libya-oil/ [Accessed: 2020-12-08].
Worldometers 2016b. [Online] https://www.worldometers.info/gas/ [Accessed: 2020-12-08].
Worldometer 2020. Libya Population. [Online] https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/libya-population/ [Accessed: 2020-12-08].
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Mussa Mohamed Bahour
1
ORCID: ORCID
M.F.M. Alkbir
2
Fatihhi Januddi
2
Adnan Bakri
2

  1. Business School, University Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  2. Advance Facilities Engineering Technology Research Cluster (AFET-RC); Facilities Maintenance Engineering Section (FAME), Malaysian Institute of Industrial Technology, Universiti Kuala Lumpur (UniKL MITEC), Persiaran Sinaran Ilmu, Bandar Seri Alam, 81750, Johor, Malaysia
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Renewable energy development is crucial for resolving global warming issues and achieving

sustainable development goals. The objective of this paper is to reveal renewable energy trends

using statistical data to identify the most developed technologies in the field, their distribution by

territory, checking the interrelation between investments in R&D and patent activity.

The changes in total investments made in renewables are studied for 2004–2019 and the increasing

trend has been observed with some fluctuations in certain years, major current investments in solar

and wind energy are detected. The dynamics of international patenting activity in solar and wind

technologies, geothermal and fuel cells, the total number of PCT applications over the past 10 years

by geographic region are considered. The results show some differences across various renewable

technologies. Solar is the most patented, wind and fuel cells are less patented but solar and wind

have shown an uptrend for the last five years, while fuel cell technologies showed a decline after

2008. Geothermal is the least patented.

The comparison between investment and patent application trends in renewables undercovers some

important issues – the leading role of Japan in patenting under the PCT procedure, while China is

a major investor in renewable energy; the US and Europe with big investments in renewables are

also leading in patent registration.

Correlation between investment in R&D and patenting activity in the field of global renewable

energy should be emphasized (correlation coefficient R = 0,849 for 2002–2019). Since private

and public investment is strongly stimulated by domestic renewable energy policies, IP indicators

can help identify policy instruments and their effectiveness within the further research

framework.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Tetiana Sobolieva
ORCID: ORCID
Nataliia Harashchenko
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The primary aim of this paper was to assess the development of prosumer energy sector in Poland. In the first point, the basic notions connected with prosumer energy (micro-installation, prosumer) were discussed on the basis of Law of Renewable Energy Sources of February 20, 2015 (Journal of Laws, item 478, as amended) and the main aspects of the European Union energy policy where presented in the context of the development of the prosumer energy sector. In this part of the study, numerous benefits for the Polish economy and consumers of electrical energy, connected with the expansion of prosumer energy sector, were presented. On the other hand, many obstacles which stall this sector in Poland were noticed. In the second point the most important regulations from the Law of Renewable Energy Sources of February 20, 2015 were analyzed (In the second point the most important regulations from the Law of Renewable Energy Sources of February 20, 2015 (hereinafter: the RES act) were analyzed). On the basis of this legal act, the so called “rebate system”, which is currently used in Poland to support prosumers of electrical energy, was described. Moreover, many legal and administrative simplifications implemented by the RES act were indicated. The analytical approach to the RES Act in this study resulted in the detection of many regulations in this legal act which may have an adverse impact on the development of the prosumer energy sector in Poland. In the third point, programs co-financed by the Polish government or the European Union, which financially support the purchase and installation of energy technologies using RES, were described. Statistical data connected with the prosumer energy sector in Poland was presented in the fourth point of this paper. On the basis thereof, the authors attempted to find the correlation between the number of prosumers and the share of the amount of electrical energy from renewable energy sources in gross electrical energy consumption. In the fifth point issues connected with energy technologies used in the Polish prosumer energy sector were discussed. Moreover, this point focuses on the great popularity of photovoltaic modules among Polish prosumers and results in the reluctance of Polish prosumers to install wind microturbines and small hydroelectric power plants.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jan Kuchmacz
Łukasz Mika
ORCID: ORCID
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The inevitability and successive implementation of the elements of the European Union (EU) energy policy and the freedom of achieving the goals left in this regard for the member states should translate into actions taking the specificity of local markets into account, in order to carry out liberalization processes in a harmonious manner. In 2016, the European Commission published a package of guidance documents “Clean Energy for All Europeans” in the perspective of 2030, also known as the Winter Package. The recommendations contained in some of the documents assume the continuation of integration of markets in the national and regional dimension, setting ambitious targets in the field of decarbonization, the increase of energy efficiency and the increase of Renewable Energy Sources (RES) share in the energy balance of EU countries. The short time to carry out a thorough reconstruction of the energy-generating sector forces to seek solutions that are in line with the European Community recommendations and, at the same time, do not constitute an excessive burden for the national economy and legal order. One of the activities is to use the potential of micro-networks of local communities striving for energy independence based on their own energy sources and to create regulations enabling the neighborly exchange of energy. This mechanism works in the form of pilot projects in many locations around the world (Sonnen Group; Power Ledger). The paper presents the concept of functional and analytical assumptions for an exemplary structure of neighboring prosumers along with the presentation of simulation results based on real generation and consumption profiles and the presentation of investment profitability indicators for the proposed functional model.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Joanna Wróbel
Maciej Sołtysik
Radomir Rogus
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The Włocławek Hydroelectric Power Plant is one of Poland’s largest power-generation projects.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marcin Kmieciński
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The connection of renewable energy sources with significant nominal power (in the order of MW) to the medium-voltage distribution grid affects the operating conditions of that grid. Due to the increasing number of installed renewable energy sources and the limited transmission capacity of medium-voltage networks, the cooperation of these energy sources is becoming increasingly important. This article presents the results of a six-year study on a 2 MW wind power plant and a 1 MW photovoltaic power plant in the province of Warmia and Mazury, which are located a few kilometers away from each other. In this study, active energy, currents, voltages as well as active, reactive, and apparent power and higher harmonics of currents and voltages were measured. The obtained results show the parameters determining the power quality at different load levels. Long-term analysis of the operation of these power plants in terms of the generated electricity and active power transmitted to the power grid facilitated estimating the repeatability of active energy production and the active power generated in individual months of the year and times of day by a wind power plant and a photovoltaic power plant. It also allowed us to assess the options of cooperation between these energy sources. It is important, not only from a technical but also from an economic point of view, to determine the nominal power of individual power plants connected to the same connection point. Therefore, the cooperation of two such power plants with the same nominal power of 2 MW was analyzed and the economic losses caused by a reduction in electricity production resulting from connection capacity were estimated.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1.  C. Warren, “Feature — Wind, Sun, and Water,” EPRI Journal, no. 3, pp. 8–11, May/June 2016.
  2.  The Construction Law Act of 7 July 1994. Dz.U. 2019, item 1186.
  3.  The Energy Law Act of 10 April 1997. Dz.U. 1997, no. 54, item 348 as amended.
  4.  The Environmental Protection Law Act of 27 April 2001. Dz.U. 2001, no. 62, item 627.
  5.  The Act on Providing Information about the Environment and its Protection, Public Participation in the Environmental Protection and on Environmental Impact Assessment of 3 October 2008. Dz.U. 2008, no. 199, item 1227.
  6.  The Regulation of the Council of Ministers of 10 September 2019 on projects which may significantly affect the environment. Dz.U. 2019, item 1839.
  7.  The Act amending the Renewable Energy Sources Act and Some Other Acts of 7 June 2018, Dz.U. 2018, item 1276.
  8.  The Renewable Energy Sources Act of 20 February 2015. Dz.U. 2015, item 478 as amended.
  9.  H. Ritchie and M. Roser, “Renewable Energy.” [Online]. Available: https://ourworldindata.org/renewable-energy. [Accessed: 15 Nov. 2020].
  10.  G. Chicco, J. Schlabbach, and F. Spertino, “Characterisation and assessment of the harmonic emission of grid-connected photovoltaic systems,” in Proc. IEEE Russia Power Tech, 2005, pp.  1–7, doi: 10.1109/PTC.2005.4524744.
  11.  L. Liu, H. Li, Y. Xue, and W. Liu, “Reactive power compensation and optimization strategy for grid-interactive cascaded photovoltaic systems,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 188–202, 2015, doi: 10.1109/TPEL.2014.2333004.
  12.  S. Mishra and P.K. Ray, “Power quality improvement using photovoltaic fed DSTATCOM based on JAYA optimization,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1672–1680, 2016, doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2016.2570256.
  13.  A. Lange and M. Pasko, “Selected aspects of photovoltaic power station operation in the power system,” Przegląd Elektrotechniczny, vol. 96, no. 5, pp. 30–34, 2020, doi: 10.15199/48.2020.05.05.
  14.  H. Serghine, R. Merahi, R. Chenni, and D. Buła, “Combined operation of photovoltaic and active power filter system connected to nonlinear load,” Roum. Sci. Techn. Électrotechn. Énerg., vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 371–376, 2019, doi: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342079034.
  15.  N. Mansouri, A. Lashab, D. Sera, J.M. Guerrero, and A. Cherif, “Large photovoltaic power plants integration: A review of challenges and solutions,” Energies, vol. 12, no. 19, pp. 3798, 2019, doi: 10.3390/en12193798.
  16.  J. Smith, S. Rönnberg, M. Bollen, J. Meyer, A.M. Blanco, K.-L. Koo, and D. Mushamalirwa, “Power quality aspects of solar power – results from CIGRE JWG C4/C6.29,” CIRED – Open Access Proceedings Journal, 2017, pp. 809–813, 2017, doi: 10.1049/oap-cired.2017.0351.
  17.  J. Meyer, A. M. Blanco, S. Rönnberg, M. Bollen, and J. Smith, “CIGRE C4/C6.29: survey of utilities experiences on power quality issues related to solar power,” CIRED – Open Access Proceedings Journal, 2017, pp. 539–543, doi: 10.1049/oap-cired.2017.0456.
  18.  Z. Chen and E. Spooner, “Grid power quality with variable speed wind turbines,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 148–154, 2001, doi: 10.1109/60.921466.
  19.  A. Lange and M. Pasko, “Selected aspects of wind power plant operation in the power system,” in Proc. 12th Int. Conf. and Exhibition on Electrical Power Quality and Utilisation (EPQU), 2020, pp. 1–4, doi: 10.1109/EPQU50182.2020.9220302.
  20.  M. Mróz, K. Chmielowiec, and Z. Hanzelka, “Voltage fluctuations in networks with distributed power sources,” in Proc. 15th Int. Conf. on Harmonics and Quality of Power (ICHQP), 2012, pp.  920–925, doi: 10.1109/ICHQP.2012.6381206.
  21.  M. Farhoodnea, A. Mohamed, H. Shareef, and H. Zayandehroodi, “Power quality impact of renewable energy based generators and electric vehicles on distribution systems,” Procedia Technology, vol. 11, pp. 11–17, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2013.12.156.
  22.  N. Golovanov, G.C. Lazaroiu, M. Roscia, and D. Zaninelli, “Power quality assessment in small scale renewable energy sources supplying distribution systems,” Energies, vol. 6, no. 2, pp.  634–645, 2013, doi: 10.3390/en6020634.
  23.  A. Merzic, M. Music, and M. Redzic, “A complementary hybrid system for electricity generation based on solar and wind energy taking into account local consumption – Case study,” in Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Electric Power and Energy Conversion Systems, 2013, pp.  1–6, doi: 10.1109/EPECS.2013.6712993.
  24.  R.N.S.R. Mukhtaruddin, H.A. Rahman, and M.O.J. Hassan, “Economic analysis of grid-connected hybrid photovoltaic-wind system in Malaysia,” in Proc. Int. Conf. on Clean Electrical Power (ICCEP), 2013, pp. 577–583, doi: 10.1109/ICCEP.2013.6586912.
  25.  K. Benyahia, L. Boumediene, and A. Mezouar, “Efficiency and performance of mixed wind farm using photovoltaic solar farm as STATCOM,” in Proc. 3rd Int. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Conference (IRSEC), 2015, pp. 1–5, doi: 10.1109/IRSEC.2015.7455092.
  26.  Ö. Kiymaz and T. Yavuz, “Wind power electrical systems integration and technical and economic analysis of hybrid wind power plants,” in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA), 2016, pp. 158–163, doi: 10.1109/ ICRERA.2016.7884529.
  27.  C. Wang, S. Liu, Z. Bie, and J. Wang, “Renewable Energy Accommodation Capability Evaluation of Power System with Wind Power and Photovoltaic Integration,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 51, no. 28, pp.  55–60, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.11.677.
  28.  M. Bollen, J. Meyer, H. Amaris, A.M. Blanco, A.G. de Castro, J. Desmet, M. Klatt, Ł. Kocewiak, S. Rönnberg, and K. Yang, “Future work on harmonics – some expert opinions Part I – wind and solar power,” Proc. of 16th International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power (ICHQP), 2014, pp. 904–908, doi: 10.1109/ICHQP.2014.6842870.
  29.  S.K. Rönnberg, K. Yang, M.H.J. Bollen, and A. Gil de Castro, “Waveform distortion – a comparison of photovoltaic and wind power,” Proc. of 16th International Conf. on Harmonics and Quality of Power (ICHQP), 2014, pp. 733–737, doi: 10.1109/ICHQP.2014.6842782.
  30.  O. Lennerhag, M. Bollen, S. Ackeby, and S. Rönnberg, “Very short variations in voltage (timescale less than 10 minutes) due to variations in wind and solar power,” Proc. of International Conference and Exhibition on Electricity Distribution, CIRED, 2015, pp. 1–5.
  31.  A. Zomers and R. Seethapathy, “The potential of hybrid systems for off-grid power supply,” ELECTRA, no. 289, Report WG C6.28, pp. 23–27, 2016.
  32.  D. Heide, L. von Bremen, M. Greiner, C. Hoffmann, M. Speckmann, and S. Bofinger, “Seasonal optimal mix of wind and solar power in a future, highly renewable Europe,” Renew. Energy, vol.  35, no. 11, pp. 2483–2489, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2010.03.012.
  33.  L. Hirth, “The optimal share of variable renewables: How the variability of wind and solar power affects their welfare-optimal deployment,” The Energy Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, pp.  149–184, 2015, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2351754.
  34.  W. Ningbo, “The key technology of the control system of wind farm and photovoltaic power plant cluster,” in Proc. IEEE International Conference on Power System Technology, 2014, pp.  2833–2839, doi: 10.1109/POWERCON.2014.6993817.
  35.  S.S. Singh, E. Fernandez, and T.Ksh. Tompok Singh, “Reliable PV/Wind renewable energy mix for a remote area,” in Proc. Annual IEEE India Conference (INDICON), 2015, pp. 1–5, doi: 10.1109/INDICON.2015.7443419.
  36.  Y. Zhang, L. Wei, and J. Li, “Study on renewable energy integration influence and accommodation capability in regional power grid,” in Proc. 5th International Conference on Electric Utility Deregulation and Restructuring and Power Technologies (DRPT), 2015, pp. 563–568, doi: 10.1109/DRPT.2015.7432292.
  37.  L.R.A. Gabriel Filho, O.J. Seraphim, F.L. Caneppele, C.P.C. Gabriel, and F.F. Putti, “Variable analysis in wind photovoltaic hybrid systems in rural energization,” IEEE Latin America Transactions, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 4757–4761, 2016, doi: 10.1109/TLA.2016.7817007.
  38.  Y. Shuo, B. Hongkun, W. Jiangbo, Y. Meng, M. Renyuan, and Y. Jing, “Accommodated capacity for wind and solar power under the background of supply side reform: Model and empirical study,” in Proc. 2nd International Conference on Power and Renewable Energy (ICPRE), 2017, pp.  382–386, doi: 10.1109/ICPRE.2017.8390563.
  39.  D.B. Carvalho, E.C. Guardia, and J.W. Marangon Lima, “Technical-economic analysis of the insertion of PV power into a wind-solar hybrid system,” Solar Energy, vol. 191, pp.  530–539, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.06.070.
  40.  A. Thomas and P. Racherla, “Constructing statutory energy goal compliant wind and solar PV infrastructure pathways,” Renewable Energy, vol. 161, pp. 1–19, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.06.141.
  41.  Z. Hanzelka and A. Firlit. Elektrownie ze źródłami odnawialnymi. Zagadnienia wybrane. Kraków: AGH, 2015, pp. 459–484.
  42.  K. Mousa, H. AlZu’bi, and A. Diabat, “Design of a hybrid solar-wind power plant using optimization,” in Proc. 2nd International Conference on Engineering System Management and Applications (ICESMA), 2010, pp. 1–6.
  43.  J. Jurasz and J. Mikulik, “Economic and environmental analysis of a hybrid solar, wind and pumped storage hydroelectric energy source: a Polish perspective,” Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 859–869, 2017, doi: 10.1515/bpasts-2017-0093.
  44.  P. Marchel, J. Paska, K. Pawlak, and K. Zagrajek, “A practical approach to optimal strategies of electricity contracting from Hybrid Power Sources,” Bull. Polish Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci., vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 1543–1551, 2020, doi: 10.24425/bpasts.2020.135377.
  45.  R. Al Badwawi, M. Abusara, and T. Mallick, “A review of hybrid solar PV and wind energy system,” Smart Science, vol. 3, no.  3, pp. 127–138, 2015, doi: 10.1080/23080477.2015.11665647.
  46.  F.A. Khan, N. Pal, and S.H. Saeed, “Review of solar photovoltaic and wind hybrid energy systems for sizing strategies optimization techniques and cost analysis methodologies,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 92, pp. 937–947, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j. rser.2018.04.107.
  47.  K. Sood and E. Muthusamy, “A comprehensive review on hybrid renewable energy systems,” Modern Physics Letters B, vol. 34, no.  27, pp. 2050290, 2020, doi: 10.1142/S0217984920502905.
  48.  Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/631 of 14 April 2016 establishing a network code on requirements for grid connection of generators.
  49.  International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC). Testing and measurement techniques – Power quality measurement methods (IEC 61000-4-30:2015). IEC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015.
  50.  International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC). Power quality measurement in power supply systems – Part 2: Functional tests and uncertainty requirements (IEC 62586-2:2017). IEC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
  51.  International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC). Testing and measurement techniques – General guide on harmonics and interharmonics measurements and instrumentation, for power supply systems and equipment connected thereto (IEC 61000-4-7: 2002 + AMD1: 2008 CSV). IEC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.
  52.  D. Buła, D. Grabowski, A. Lange, M. Maciążek, and M. Pasko, “Long- and Short-Term Comparative Analysis of Renewable Energy Sources,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 14, pp. 3610, 2020, doi: 10.3390/en13143610.
  53.  International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Recommendations for small renewable energy and hybrid systems for rural electrification – Part 7‒1: Generators – Photovoltaic generators (IEC TS 62257-7-1:2010). IEC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2010.
  54.  International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) – Part 3‒6: Limits – Assessment of emission limits for the connection of distorting installations to MV, HV and EHV power systems (IEC TR 61000-3-6:2008). IEC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.
  55.  European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization. Standard EN 50160:2010: Voltage Characteristics of Electricity Supplied by Public Distribution Systems; CENELEC: Brussels, Belgium, 2010.
  56.  International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Wind energy generation systems – Part 21‒1: Measurement and assessment of electrical characteristics – Wind turbines (IEC 61400-21-1:2019). IEC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Andrzej Lange
1
ORCID: ORCID
Marian Pasko
2
Dariusz Grabowski
2
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Department of Electrical and Power Engineering, Electronics and Automation, University of Warmia and Mazury, ul. M. Oczapowskiego 11, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland
  2. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Silesian University of Technology, ul. Akademicka 10, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper discusses the impact of the European Green Deal policy on the clean energy transformation in the European Union, focusing on the generation of electricity reaching a significant milestone for the EU in 2020 – renewable energy sources for the first time in history surpassing combined fossil fuels in the generation of electrical energy. This achievement, although partially influenced by the exceptional circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic and the electricity demand shock, is primarily an effect of the Clean Energy for all Europeans Package implementing the European Green Deal strategy designed to position the EU as a global leader in the green transformation, leading by example and turning climate challenges into a growth opportunity, and in doing so presenting an optimistic policy perspective for a global transformation towards a 100% renewable energy world, thus supporting mitigation of the global-warming threats by significantly cutting greenhouse-gas emissions. With the immediate effects of the 2018 recast Renewable Energy Directive (2018/2001/EU) and other related clean-energy policies under the umbrella of the European Green Deal, coal and lignite electric generation has fallen in 2020 by as much as 22% (87 TWh) and the nuclear generation has dropped by 11% (79 TWh), with natural gas to a much lesser extent, yet still noting an annual drop of 3%, while renewables grew, surpassing the combined fossil fuels electricity output in the whole of the EU. This is an impressive result confirmed in late 2021 and a hallmark of the European Green Deal initial success, the sustainability of which is yet to be assessed in the coming years, especially in view of the recent international situation of major destabilization. In this context, it should be added that although the newest 2022 Global Energy Review report by the IEA confirmed in 2021, the highest global CO 2emission level in history (following the post -pandemic economic rebound and also due to the gas-price crisis of late 2021 causing gas-to-coal shifts in electricity-mix, which in the EU, resulted in a 7% relative annual emissions increase), Europe’s emission level has remained in a diminishing trend following the European achievements of 2020, with an overall CO 2 emissions decrease of 2.4% in comparison with the level of 2019. Most likely, however, the 2021 gas-price crisis was only a mere prelude to a much more robust long- -term perturbation that will be expectedly due to the war in Ukraine and the necessary sanctions policy, especially impacting the energy market and probably further hampering the green-transition process jointly with other economic factors.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Agnieszka Ewa Rządkowska
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Institute of International Studies, University of Wrocław, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article analyzes and evaluates the development of renewable energy from the standpoint of state regulation and incentives. It is noted that the global production of renewable electricity has increased by 15% over the last year. The periods of introduction of the “green tariff” as an economic stimulus for the development of solar energy, which became the starting point for the development of alternative generation in different countries, are analyzed. The role of institutional factors in the development of renewable energy, such as the free issuance of licenses for electricity generation, stimulating the creation of specialized research areas, technology development and production of relevant equipment, was observed. The necessity of taking into account the regional peculiarity in the state stimulation of the development of renewable energy is proved. The economic efficiency of the state regulation of alternative energy in time measurement per conditional unit of alternative renewable energy stations was calculated, taking the coefficient of proportionality into account. Therefore, the calculation indicates the high effectiveness of government policy in regulating energy in terms of only short-term lag (α = 1.3) and the number of stations 80 percent of full saturation relative to the basic needs of energy consumption. A separate further stage in the development of renewable energy without the introduction and expansion of the “green tariff” has been identified. This approach was introduced in Poland, which ensured the country not only the inflow of foreign investment, but also the formation of free competition among investors.
Go to article

Bibliography

Barbose, G.L. 2021. US Renewables Portfolio Standards 2021 Status Update: Early Release. Berkeley, United States: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL).
Bazaluk et al. 2021a – Bazaluk, O., Havrysh, V. and Nitsenko, V. 2021a. Energy and environmental assessment of straw production for power generation. E3S Web of Conferences 228, DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202122801010.
Bazaluk et al. 2021b – Bazaluk, O., Havrysh, V., Fedorchuk, M. and Nitsenko, V. 2021b. Energy Assessment of Sorghum Cultivation in Southern Ukraine. Agriculture 11(8), DOI: 10.3390/agriculture11080695.
BMWi 2010. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie (BMWi) 2010. Energiekonzept für eine umweltschonende, zuverlässige und bezahlbare Energieversorgung. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie.
Cader et al. 2021 – Cader, J., Olczak, P. and Koneczna, R. 2021. Regional dependencies of interest in the “My Electricity” photovoltaic subsidy program in Poland. Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 24(2), pp. 97–116, DOI: 10.33223/epj/133473.
Climate Change Act 2008. [Online] https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/27/contents [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Climate Change Laws of the World 2016. 13th Five-Year Plan. [Online] https://www.climate-laws.org/geographies/china/policies/13th-five-year-plan [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Edie Newsroom 1999. GERMANY: Shell opens solar cell factory in Europe’s ‘Solar Valley’. [Online] https://www.edie.net/news/0/GERMANY-Shell-opens-solar-cell-factory-in-Europes-Solar-Valley/1977 [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
EISA 2007. Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. [Online] https://www.govinfo.gov/content/ pkg/BILLS-110hr6enr/pdf/BILLS-110hr6enr.pdf [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Energy Act 2004. UK Public General Acts. [Online] https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/20/contents [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Energy Act 2008. UK Public General Acts. [Online] https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/32/contents [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Energy Act 2010. [Online] https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/27/pdfs/ukpga_20100027_en.pdf [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Energy Act 2013. [Online] https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2013/32/pdfs/ukpga_20130032_en.pdf [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Energy Act 2016. UK Public General Acts. [Online] https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2016/20/contents/enacted [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
EPAct 2005. Energy Policy Act of 2005, Public Law 109-58. [Online] https://www.congress.gov/109/ plaws/publ58/PLAW-109publ58.pdf [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz 2000. [Online] https://www.clearingstelle-eeg-kwkg.de/eeg2000 [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz 2004. [Online] https://www.clearingstelle-eeg-kwkg.de/eeg2004 [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz 2009. [Online] https://www.clearingstelle-eeg-kwkg.de/eeg2009 [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz 2014. Retrieved from https://www.clearingstelle-eeg-kwkg.de/eeg2014 [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Gestore Rete Trasmissione Nazionale 2002. Provisional Data on Operation of the Italian Power System. [Online] http://collaudo.download.terna.it/terna/0000/0124/06.PDF [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
GSE 2014. Incentivazionedellaproduzione di energiaelettrica da impianti a fontirinnovabilidiversidai fotovoltaici. [Online] https://www.gse.it [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
GSE 2021. Energy consumption. [Online] https://www.gse.it/ [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
IRENA 2015. Renewable Energy Prospects: United States of America. [Online] https://www.irena.org/publications/2015/Jan/Renewable-Energy-Prospects-United-States-of-America [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
IRENA 2020. Country Rankings. [Online] https://www.irena.org/Statistics/View-Data-by-Topic/Capacity-and-Generation/Country-Rankings [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Kholiavko et al. 2020 – Kholiavko, N., Popova, L., Marych, M., Hanzhurenko, I., Koliadenko, S. and Nitsenko, V. 2020. Comprehensive methodological approach to estimating the research component influence on the information economy development. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu 4(178), pp. 192–199, DOI: 10.33271/nvngu/2020-4/192.
Kohler, T. 2021. Renewable Energies marketing models Poland. [Online] https://www.roedl.com/renewable-energy-consulting/markets/countries/marketing-models-poland [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Koval et al. 2021 – Koval, V., Hrymalyuk, A., Kulish, A., Kontseva, V., Boiko, N. and Nesenenko, P. 2021. Economic policy of industrial development and investment approach to the analysis of the national economy. Estudios De Economia Aplicada 39(6), DOI: 10.25115/eea.v39i6.5263.
Koval et al. 2019 – Koval, V., Sribna, Y. and Gaska, K. 2019. Energy cooperation Ukraine-Poland to strengthen energy security. E3S Web Conference 132, 01009, DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/201913201009.
Labunska et al. 2017 – Labunska, Sv., Petrova, M. and Prokopishyna, O. 2017. Asset and cost management for innovation activity. Economic Annals – XXI 165(5–6), pp. 13–18, DOI: 10.21003/ea.V165-03.
Ministry of Economic Development of Italy 2018. Proposta di piano nazionaleintegrato per l’energia e il clima. [Online] https://www.mise.gov.it/images/stories/documenti/Proposta_di_Piano_Nazionale_Integrato_ per_Energia_e_il_Clima_Italiano.pdf [Accessed: 2021-09-05] (in Italian).
MOFCOM 2013. Renewable Energy Law of the People’s Republic of China. [Online] http://english.mofcom.gov.cn/article/policyrelease/Businessregulations/201312/20131200432160.shtml [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
National Development and Reform Comission 2019. [Online] https://web.archive.org/web/20190511191431/http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/gzdt/201509/t20150921_751695.html [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
National Energy Administration 2021. [Online] http://english.www.gov.cn/state_council/2014/10/01/content_ 281474991089761.htm [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Olczak at al. 2020 – Olczak, P., Matuszewska, D. and Kryzia, D. 2020. “Mój Prąd” as an example of the photovoltaic one off grant program in Poland. Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 23(2), pp. 123–138, DOI: 10.33223/epj/122482.
Olczak at al. 2021a – Olczak, P., Kryzia, D., Matuszewska, D. and Kuta, M. 2021a. “My Electricity” Program Effectiveness Supporting the Development of PV Installation in Poland. Energies 14(1), 231, DOI: 10.3390/en14010231.
Olczak et al. 2021b – Olczak, P., Przemysław, J., Kryzia, D., Matuszewska, D., Fyk, M. and Dyczko, A. 2021b. Analyses of duck curve phenomena potential in polish PV prosumer households’ installations. Energy Reports 7, November 2021, pp. 4609–4622, DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.07.038.
Piper et al. 2019 – Piper, S., Cotting, A., Wilson, A., O’Reilly, J., Hlinka, M., Lehmann, J. and Hering, G. 2019. The 2020 US renewable energy outlook. [Online] https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/research/the-2020-us-renewable-energy-outlook [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Pukala, R. and Petrova, M. 2019. Application of the AHP method to select an optimal source of financing innovation in the mining sector. E3S Web of Conferences 105, DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/201910504034.
REN21 2018. A comprehensive annual overview of the state of renewable energy. [Online] https://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Full-Report-2018.pdf [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Shmygol et al. 2020 – Shmygol, N., Schiavone, F., Trokhymets, O., Pawliszczy, D., Koval, V., Zavgorodniy, R. and Vorfolomeiev, A. 2020. Model for assessing and implementing resource-efficient strategy of industry. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2713, pp. 277–294.
Rogalski, T. 2018. A guide to support for Polish renewable energy sources following the 2018 amendments. [Online] https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/de-de/wissen/publications/5932a770/a-guide-to-support -for-polish-renewable-energy-sources-following-the-2018-amendments [Accessed: 2021-09-05].
Tsimoshynska et al. 2021 – Tsimoshynska, O., Koval, M., Kryshtal, H., Filipishyna, L., Arsawan, W.E. and Koval, V. 2021. Investing in road construction infrastructure projects under public-private partnership in the form of concession. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu 2, pp. 184–192, DOI: 10.33271/nvngu/2021-2/184.
Yankovyi et al. 2021 – Yankovyi, O., Koval, V., Lazorenko, L., Poberezhets, O., Novikova, M. and Gonchar, V. 2021. Modeling Sustainable Economic Development Using Production Functions. Estudios de Economia Aplicada 39(5), DOI: 10.25115/eea.v39i5.5090.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Viktor Koval
1
ORCID: ORCID
Yevheniia Sribna
2
ORCID: ORCID
Sylwester Kaczmarzewski
3
ORCID: ORCID
Alla Shapovalova
4
Viktor Stupnytskyi
5

  1. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine
  2. National University of Water and Environmental Engineering, Ukraine
  3. Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute Polish Akademy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
  4. V.I. Vernadsky Taurida National University, Ukraine
  5. Dubno Branch Higher Education Institution «Open International University of Human Development «Ukraine», Ukraine
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article aims to explore the determinants of the process of attracting financial resources for implementing renewable (alternative) energy development projects in Ukraine. The authors review and systematize the sources of funding and innovative financial instruments available for developing renewable energy sources (RES) in developing countries. Based on this, a pool of financial resources/RES development tools available for investment in Ukraine has been formed. It is proposed to build a model of the optimal structure of sources of financing renewable energy development projects. The research is founded on the forecasted schedule for increasing the share of RES in the national energy balance of Ukraine up until 2035. The limitations are connected with the lack of factual data on sources/instruments of funding in the field of RES. The model enables the prediction of the amount of funds that need to be allocated to finance renewable energy development projects, while optimizing the structure of their potential funding. The originality/value of the article lies firstly in the innovative application of the optimization model for forecasting the aggregate structure of funding sources in the energy sector; secondly, in the possibility of testing the model in practice and monitoring RES development projects in the territorial communities of the Carpathian region of Ukraine on the basis of the project-educational center for the development of innovations and investments in the region; thirdly, the proposed model can be used in the activities of state authorities and institutions of Ukraine for forming the policy of supporting alternative energy development projects.
Go to article

Bibliography


AC 2021. “Agents of Change” of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University. [Online] http://agen-tyzmin.pnu.edu.ua/ua [Accessed: 2021-08-25].
Bilyavs`ky`j, M. 2020. Guidelines for the development of alternative energy in Ukraine until 2030 (Орієнтири розвитку альтернативної енергетики України до 2030 р.). The Razumkov Centre [Online] https://razumkov.org.ua/statti/oriientyry-rozvytku-alternatyvnoi-energetyky-ukrainy-do-2030r#a12 [Accessed: 2021-08-25] (in Ukrainian).
Bjarne, S. 2018. The importance of project finance for renewable energy projects Energy Economics. Volume 69, January 2018, рр. 280–294, DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.11.006.
CMU 2017. On approval of the Energy Strategy of Ukraine for the period up to 2035 “Security, en- ergy efficiency, competitiveness” (Про схвалення Енергетичної стратегії України на період до 2035 року “Безпека, енергоефективність, конкурентоспроможність”). [Online] https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/605-2017-%D1%80?lang=uk#Text [Accessed: 2021-06-25] (in Ukrainian).
DEPC 2009. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. [Online] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32009L0028 [Accessed: 2021-06-22].
FMEAE 2015. The Energy Transition in Buildings Platform. Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy. [Online] https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/EN/Textsammlungen/Energy/energy-transition-buildings-platform.html?cms_artId=1328378 [Accessed: 2021-08-25].
GF 2020. Crowdfunding for development and climate finance. Globalfields. [Online] https://www.global- fields.co.uk/insights/crowdfunding-for-development-and-climate-finance [Accessed: 2021-08-25].
Goncharuk et al. 2021 – Goncharuk, A.G., Hromovenko, K., Pahlevanzade, A. and Hrinchenko, Y. 2021. Energy poverty leap during the pandemic: the case of Ukraine. Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 24(2), pp. 5–18, DOI: 10.33223/epj/136521.
IRENA 2009. Statute of the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). International Renewa- ble Energy Agency. [Online] https://irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/About-IRENA/Statute/IRENA_FC_Statute_signed_in_Bonn_26_01_2009_incl_declaration_on_further_authentic_versions. ashx?la=en&hash=FAB3B5AE51B8082B04A7BBB5BDE978065EF67D96&hash=FAB3B5AE51B-8082B04A7BBB5BDE978065EF67D96 [Accessed: 2021-06-21].
IRENA 2021. Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2020. International Renewable Energy Agency. [Online] https://www.irena.org/publications/2021/Jun/Renewable-Power-Costs-in-2020 [Accessed: 2021-06-21].
KPMG 2019. Renewable energy sources in Ukraine (Відновлювані джерела енергії в Україні). KPMG Ukraine. [Online] https://home.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/ua/pdf/2019/09/Renewables-Report_2019-ua.pdf [Accessed: 2021-08-25] (in Ukrainian).
MDCTU 2021. Ministry of Development of Communities and Territories of Ukraine. [Online] https://www.minregion.gov.ua/ [Accessed: 2021-08-29].
MEcU 2021. Ministry of Economy of Ukraine. [Online] h ttps://me.gov.ua/old/?lang=en-GB [Accessed: 2021-08-29].
MEnU 2021. Ministry of Energy of Ukraine. [Online] http://mpe.kmu.gov.ua [Accessed: 2021-08-29].
Nigam et al. 2018 – Nigam, N., Mbarek, S. and Benetti, C. 2018. Crowdfunding to finance eco-innovation: case studies from leading renewable energy platforms. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management 26(2), pp. 195–219. [Online] https://www.cairn.info/revue-journal-of-innovation-economics-2018-2-page-195.htm [Accessed: 2021-08-25].
NRSDGU 2017. National Report “Sustainable Development Goals: Ukraine” (Національна доповідь «Цілі Сталого Розвитку: Україна»). [Online] https://ukraine.un.org/uk/49413-2017-nacionalna-do-povid-cili-stalogo-rozvitku-ukraina [Accessed: 2021-04-25] (in Ukrainian).
Nyenno et al. 2020 – Nyenno, I., Selivanova, N., Korolenko, N. and Truba, V. 2020. The energy policy risk management system model: theories and practices. Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 23(4), pp. 33–48, DOI: 10.33223/epj/127699.
RE 2020. Renewable Energy 2020: With What Ukrainians will Start Next Year. [Online] https://ua-energy.org/uk/posts/vidnovliuvana-enerhetyka-2020-z-chym-ukraintsi-uviidut-u-nastupnyi-rik [Accessed: 2021-08-25].
SAEE 2021. State support for energy saving – the program of “warm loans” State Agency for Energy Efficiency and Energy Saving of Ukraine. [Online] https://saee.gov.ua/uk/consumers/tepli-kredyty [Accessed: 2021-08-25].
SFRD 2021. State Fund for Regional Development. [Online] https://new.dfrr.minregion.gov.ua/pro-dfrr [Accessed: 2021-08-29].
SG 2019. Pioneering Poland pumps up environmental credentials and considers local green bonds. Societe Generale. [Online] https://wholesale.banking.societegenerale.com/en/insights/clients-successes/clients-successes-details/news/pioneering-poland-pumps-environmental-credentials-and-considers-local-green-bonds/ [Accessed: 2021-08-25].
SSSU 2021. Energy consumption from renewable sources for 2007–2020. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. [Online] http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ [Accessed: 2021-06-25].
UE 2021. Without the “green” tariff: how renewable power generation is looking for new business models [Online] https://ua-energy.org/en/posts/30-07-2021-a2ce02d8-7437-4045-aefc-58557371cba8 [Accessed: 2021-08-25].
UN 2021. 17 Goals to Transform Our World. United Nations. [Online] https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/ [Accessed: 2021-08-01].
UNCHE 1972. United Nations Conference on the Human Environment. [Online] https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/CONF.48/14/REV.1 [Accessed: 2021-04-25].
UNDPU 2015. United Nations Development Program (UNDP) in Ukraine. [Online] https://www.ua.undp.org/content/ukraine/uk/home/sustainable-development-goals.html [Accessed: 2021-04-25].
USELF 2018. USELF – Financing of Alternative Energy by the EBRD. [Online] https://eenergy.com.ua/korysni-porady/uself-finansuvannya-alternatyvnoyi-energetyky/ [Accessed: 2021-06-25].
Zhyber, T. and Solopenko, T. 2020. The implementation of Ukraine’s energy policy using budget programs. Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 23(4), pp. 91–104, DOI: 10.33223/epj/127300.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Svitlana O. Kropelnytska
1
ORCID: ORCID
Tetiana V. Mayorova
2
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Department of Finance ; Project and Educational Centre „Agents of Changes” PNU, Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, Ukraine
  2. Department of Corporate Finance and Controlling, Vadym Hetman Kyiv National Economic University, Ukraine
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The objective of the European Green Deal is to change Europe into the world’s first climate- -neutral continent by 2050. Therefore, European countries are developing technological solutions to increase the production of energy from renewable sources of energy. In order to universally implement energy production from renewable energy sources, it is necessary to solve the problem of energy storage. The authors discussed the issue of energy storage and renewable energy sources, reviewing applied thermal and mechanical energy storage solutions. They referred to the energy sector in Poland which is based mainly on mining activities. The method that was used in this paper is a review of thermal and mechanical energy storage solutions. In industrial practice, various solutions on energy storage are developed around the world. The authors reviewed those solutions and described the ones which currently function in practice. Hence, the authors presented the good practices of energy storage technology. Additionally, the authors conducted an analysis of statistical data on the energy sector in Poland. The authors presented data on prime energy production in Poland in 2004–2019. They described how the data has changed over time. Subsequently, they presented and interpreted data on renewable energy sources in Poland. They also showed the situation of Poland compared to other European countries in the context of the share of renewables in the final gross energy consumption.
Go to article

Bibliography

Abbas et al. 2020 – Abbas, Z., Chen, D., Li, Y., Yong, L. and Wang, R.Z. 2020. Experimental investigation of underground seasonal cold energy storage using borehole heat exchangers based on laboratory scale sandbox. Geothermics 87, 101837.
Agencja Rynku Energii SA 2020. Primary Energy Balance in 2004–2019 (Bilans Energii Pierwotnej w latach 2004–2019). Warszawa (in Polish).
Airly, 2020. Oddychaj Polsko. Raport o stanie powietrza. [Online] https://airly.org/pl/raport-jakosci-powietrza/ [Accessed: 2021-09-09].
Bartoszek et al. 2021 – Bartoszek, S., Stankiewicz, K., Kost, G., Ćwikła, G. and Dyczko, A. 2021. Research on Ultrasonic Transducers to Accurately Determine Distances in a Coal Mine Conditions. Energies 14(9), 2532.
Belu, R. 2019. Energy storage for electric grid and renewable energy application. In: Energy Storage, Grid Integration, Energy Economics, and the Environment. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp. 29–33.
Cabała et al. 2020 – Cabała, J., Warchulski R., Rozmus, D., Środek, D. and Szełęg, E. 2020. Pb-rich slags, minerals, and pollution resulted from a medieval Ag-Pb smelting and mining operation in the Silesian-Cracovian region (southern Poland). Minerals 10, p. 28.
Cader et al. 2021a – Cader, J., Koneczna, R. and Olczak, P. 2021a. The Impact of Economic, Energy, and Environmental Factors on the Development of the Hydrogen Economy. Energies 14(16), p. 4811.
Cader et al. 2021b – Cader, J., Olczak, P. and Koneczna, R. 2021b. Regional dependencies of interest in the “My Electricity” photovoltaic subsidy program in Poland. Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 24(2), pp. 97–116.
Ciapała et al. 2021 – Ciapała, B., Jurasz, J., Janowski, M. and Kępińska, B. 2021. Climate factors influencing effective use of geothermal resources in SE Poland: the Lublin trough. Geotherm. Energy 9, p. 3. CSO 2020. Energy from renewable sources in 2019. Warsaw.
Davies, R. 2020. Peak performance: could mountains create long-term energy storage? Power Technol. [Online] https://power.nridigital.com/future_power_technology_feb20/peak_performance_could_mountains_ create_long-term_energy_storage [Accessed: 2021-04-20].
Dychkovskyi et al. 2019 – Dychkovskyi, R., Tabachenko, M., Zhadiaieva, K. and Cabana, E. 2019. Some aspects of modern vision for geoenergy usage. E3S Web Conf. 123, 01010.
Dyczko, A. and Malec, M. 2021. Innovative Concept of Production Support System for the {LW} Bogdanka Mine. {IOP} Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1134, 12004.
Energy Instrat 2021. No Title. [Online] https://www.energy.instrat.pl [Accessed: 2021-03-23].
Euractive 2021. EU’s draft renewables law confirms 38–40% target for 2030. [Online] https://www.euractiv.com/section/energy/news/leak-eus-draft-renewables-law-confirms-38-40-target-for-2030/ [Accessed: 2021-05-18].
European Commission 2019. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. The European Green Deal. Brussels.
European Environmental Agency 2021. Share of energy consumption from renewable sources in Europe. EEA. [Online] https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/renewable-gross-final-energyconsumption-5/assessment [Accessed: 2021-06-21].
Frankowski, J. 2020. Attention: Smog alert! Citizen engagement for clean air and its consequences for fuel poverty in Poland. Energy Build. 207, 109525.
Gawlik, L. ed. 2013. Coal for the Polish energy sector in the perspective of 2050 – scenario analyzes (Węgiel dla polskiej energetyki w perspektywie 2050 roku – analizy scenariuszowe). Katowice: Górnicza Izba Przemysłowo-Handlowa (in Polish).
Graboś, A. and Żymanowska-Kumon, S. 2014. Counteracting low emissions in dense residential areas (Przeciwdziałanie niskiej emisji na terenach zwartej zabudowy mieszkalnej) [ed.] R. Sadlok. Bochnia: HELIOS (in Polish).
Gravitricity 2020. Gravitricity. [Online] https://gravitricity.com/ [Accessed: 2021-07-27].
Holder, M. 2020. Gravitricity to pilot £1m gravity-based energy storage system in Edinburgh. Bus. Green. [Online] https://www.businessgreen.com/news/4015015/gravitricity-pilot-gbp-gravity-energy-storage-edinburgh [Accessed: 2021-07-22].
Hunt et al. 2020 – Hunt, J.D., Zakeri, B., Falchetta, G., Nascimento, A., Wada, Y. and Riahi, K. 2020. Mountain Gravity Energy Storage: A new solution for closing the gap between existing short- and longterm storage technologies. Energy 190, 116419.
Hussein et al. 2004 – Hussein, H.M.S., Ahmad, G.E. and El-Ghetany, H.H. 2004. Performance evaluation of photovoltaic modules at different tilt angles and orientations. Energy Convers. Manag. 45, pp. 2441–2452.
Kadar, P. 2014. Pros and Cons of the Renewable Energy Application. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica 11(4), pp. 211–224.
Kamiński, P. 2021a. A New Method of Regulation of Loads Acting on the Shaft Lining in Sections Located in the Salt Rock Mass. Energies 14(1), p. 0042.
Kamiński, P. 2021b. Development of New Mean of Individual Transport for Application in Underground Coal Mines. Energies 14(7), p. 2022.
Kamiński et al. 2021 – Kamiński, P., Dyczko, A. and Prostański, D. 2021. Virtual Simulations of a New Construction of the Artificial Shaft Bottom (Shaft Safety Platform) for Use in Mine Shafts. Energies 14(8), 2110.
Kaszyński et al. 2019 – Kaszyński, P., Komorowska, A. and Kamiński, J. 2019. Regional distribution of hard coal consumption in the power sector under selected forecasts of EUA prices. Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi – Mineral Resources Management 35(4), pp. 113–134.
Klojzy-Karczmarczyk, B. and Mazurek, J. 2009. Local government responsibilities in the process of reducing low emission (Zadania samorządów lokalnych w procesie likwidacji niskiej emisji). Polityka Energetyczna 12(2.2), pp. 277–284 (in Polish).
Komorowska et al. 2020 – Komorowska, A., Benalcazar, P., Kaszyński, P. and Kamiński, J. 2020. Economic consequences of a capacity market implementation: The case of Poland. Energy Policy 144, 111683.
Kopacz et al. 2020 – Kopacz, M., Kulpa, J., Galica, D. and Olczak, P. 2020. The influence of variability models for selected geological parameters on the resource base and economic efficiency measures – Example of coking coal deposit. Resour. Policy 68, 101711.
Koval et al. 2019 – Koval, V., Sribna, Y., Mykolenko, O. and Vdovenko, N. 2019. Environmentalconcept of energy security solutions of local communities based on energy logistics. [In:] 19th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2019, International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference-SGEM. STEF92 Technology, 51 Alexander Malinov blvd, Sofia, 1712, Bulgaria, pp. 283–290.
Kryzia, D. and Pepłowska, M. 2019. The impact of measures aimed at reducing low-stack emission in Poland on the energy efficiency and household emission of pollutants. Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 22(2), pp. 121–132.
Kubiński, K. and Szabłowski, Ł. 2020. Dynamic model of solar heating plant with seasonal thermal energy storage. Renew. Energy 145, pp. 2025–2033.
Kwestarz, M. 2016. Thermal energy storage – types of energy storage (Magazynowanie ciepła – rodzaje magazynów). Czysta Energ. 12, pp. 29–35 (in Polish).
Mangold, D. and Deschaintre, L. 2016. Seasonal thermal energy storage. Report on state of the art and necessary further R+D. [Online] http://task45.iea-shc.org/data/sites/1/publications/IEA_SHC_Task45_ B_Report.pdf {accessed: 2021.09.09].
Matuszewska et al. 2017 – Matuszewska, D., Kuta, M. and Górski, J. 2017. Cogeneration – Development and prospect in Polish energy sector. E3S Web Conf. 14, p. 01021.
Matuszewska et al. 2020 – Matuszewska, D., Kuta, M. and Olczak, P. 2020. Techno-Economic Assessment of Mobilized Thermal Energy Storage System Using Geothermal Source in Polish Conditions. Energies 13(13), p. 3404.
Matuszewska, D. and Olczak, P. 2020. Evaluation of Using Gas Turbine to Increase Efficiency of the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC). Energies 13(6), p. 1499.
Mikhno et al. 2021 – Mikhno, I., Koval, V., Shvets, G., Garmatiuk, O. and Tamosiuniene, R. 2021. Green Economy in Sustainable Development and Improvement of Resource Efficiency. Cent. Eur. Bus. Rev. 10, pp. 99–113.
Mirowski et al. 2020 – Mirowski, T., Jach-Nocoń, M., Jelonek, I. and Nocoń, A. 2020. The new meaning of solid fuels from lignocellulosic biomass used in low-emission automatic pellet boilers. Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 23(1), pp. 75–86.
Mokrzycki, E. and Gawlik, L. 2013. Strategy for the security of energy resources in Poland-renewable energy sources. [In:] Environmental Engineering IV.
Olczak, P. and Komorowska, A. 2021. An adjustable mounting rack or an additional PV panel? Cost and environmental analysis of a photovoltaic installation on a household: A case study in Poland. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments 47, 101496.
Olczak et al. 2020 – Olczak, P., Matuszewska, D. and Kryzia, D. 2020. ”Mój Prąd” as an example of the photovoltaic one off grant program in Poland. Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 23(2), pp. 123–138.
Olczak et al. 2021a – Olczak, P., Jaśko, P., Kryzia, D., Matuszewska, D., Fyk, M.I. and Dyczko, A. 2021a. Analyses of duck curve phenomena potential in polish PV prosumer households’ installations. Energy Reports 7, pp. 4609–4622.
Olczak et al. 2021b – Olczak, P., Kryzia, D., Matuszewska, D. and Kuta, M. 2021b. “My Electricity” Program Effectiveness Supporting the Development of PV Installation in Poland. Energies 14(1), p. 0231.
Olczak et al. 2021c – Olczak, P., Olek, M., Matuszewska, D., Dyczko, A. and Mania, T. 2021c. Monofacial and Bifacial Micro PV Installation as Element of Energy Transition – The Case of Poland. Energies 14(2), p. 0499.
Orzeł, B. 2020. Non-financial Value Creation Due to Non-financial Data Reporting Quality. Zesz. Nauk. Organ. i Zarządzanie 148, pp. 605–617.
Palka, D. and Stecuła, K. 2019. Concept of technology assessment in coal mining. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 261, 012038.
Państwowy Instytut Geologiczny 2020. Balance of mineral deposits resources in Poland (Bilans zasobów złóż kopalin w Polsce). Warszawa: Państwowy Instytut Geologiczny (in Polish).
Paszkowski, W. and Loska, A. 2017. The use of data mining methods for the psychoacoustic assessment of noise in urban environment. Int. Multidiscip. Sci. GeoConference SGEM 17, pp. 1059–1066.
Pedchenko et al. 2018 – Pedchenko, M., Pedchenko, L., Nesterenko, T. and Dyczko, A. 2018. Technological Solutions for the Realization of NGH-Technology for Gas Transportation and Storage in Gas Hydrate Form. Solid State Phenom. 277, pp. 123–136.
Possemiers, M. 2014. Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage under different hydrochemical and hydrogeological conditions. [Online] https://limo.libis.be/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=LIRIAS1930575&context= L&vid=Lirias&search_scope=Lirias&tab=default_tab〈=en_US&fromSitemap=1 [Accessed: 2021-09-09].
Rafał, K. and Grabowski, P. 2021. Energy storage (Magazynowanie energii). Academia – Mag. Pol. Akad. Nauk, DOI: 10.24425/academiaPAN.2021.136844 34–40 (in Polish).
REHAU 2011. Underground Thermal Energy Storage. Improving efficiency through seasonal heat storage. Canada.
Schmidt et al. 2018 – Schmidt, T., Pauschinger, T., Sørensen, P.A., Snijders, A., Djebbar, R., Boulter, R. and Thornton, J. 2018. Design Aspects for Large-scale Pit and Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage for District Heating and Cooling. Energy Procedia 149, pp. 585–594.
Soliński, J. 2004. Energy sector – world and Poland. Development 1971–2000, prospects to 2030. Statistics Poland 2019. Energia ze źródeł odnawialnych w 2018 roku. Informacje sygnalne. Statistics Poland 2020a. Energy 2020. Warszawa.
Statistics Poland 2020b. Energia ze źródeł odnawialnych w 2019 roku. Informacje sygnalne.
Stecuła, K. 2018. Decision-making Dilemmas in Mining Enterprise and Environmental Issues, i. e. Green Thinking in Mining. 18th Int. Multidiscip. Sci. Geoconference SGEM 2018, pp. 357–364.
Stecuła, K. and Brodny, J. 2017a. Perspectives on renewable energy development as alternative to conventional energy in Poland. [In:] International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM, pp. 717–724.
Stecuła, K. and Brodny, J. 2017b. Generating knowledge about the downtime of the machines in the example of mining enterprise. [In:] International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM, pp. 359–366.
Stecuła, K. and Brodny, J. 2018a. Role and meaning of coal mining in Poland. [In:] International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM. pp. 801–808.
Stecuła, K. and Brodny, J. 2018b. Decision-making possibilities in the field of excavated material quality shaping in terms of environmental protection, I. E. how to be greener in mining. [In:] International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM, pp. 243–250. Stecuła, K. and Tutak, M. 2018. Causes and effects of low-stack emission in selected regions of Poland. [In:] International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM, pp. 357–364.
Steinmann et al. 2019 – Steinmann, W.-D., Bauer, D., Jockenhöfer, H. and Johnson, M. 2019. Pumped thermal energy storage (PTES) as smart sector-coupling technology for heat and electricity. Energy 183, pp. 185–190.
Woźniak, J. and Pactwa, K. 2018. Responsible Mining – The Impact of the Mining Industry in Poland on the Quality of Atmospheric Air. Sustainability 10, p. 1184.
Wróbel et al. 2019 – Wróbel, J., Sołtysik, M. and Rogus, R. 2019. Selected elements of the Neighborly Exchange of Energy – Profitability evaluation of the functional model. Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 22(4), pp. 53–64.
Wyrwicki, G. 2004. Thermogravimetric analysis – unappreciated method for determination of rock type and quality (Analiza termograwimetryczna – niedoceniana metoda określania rodzaju i jakości kopaliny). Górnictwo Odkryw. 46, pp.120–125 (in Polish).
Żelazna et al. 2020 – Żelazna, A., Gołębiowska, J., Zdyb, A. and Pawłowski, A. 2020. A hybrid vs. on-grid photovoltaic system: Multicriteria analysis of environmental, economic, and technical aspects in life cycle perspective. Energies 13(15), p. 3978.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Artur Dyczko
1
ORCID: ORCID
Paweł Kamiński
2
Kinga Stceuła
3
Dariusz Prostański
4
Michał Kopacz
1
ORCID: ORCID
Daniel Kowol
4
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
  2. Faculty of Mining and Geoengineering, AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
  3. Przedsiębiorstwo Budowy Szybów SA, Tarnowskie Góry, Poland
  4. KOMAG Institute of Mining Technology, Gliwice, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Every developing country is beginning to rely on “green” energy in connection with environmental problems, including the global warming of our planet. It is expected that in the future, the production of electricity using the conversion of sunlight would take the dominant place in the energy infrastructure around the world. However, photovoltaic converters mainly generate intermittent energy due to natural factors (weather conditions) or the time of day in a given area. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to consider options for eliminating the interrupted nature of the operation of a solar installation through innovative additional applications. To achieve this goal, issues of the prospect of using energy storage devices and the choice of the most efficient and reliable of them are considered, as are the environmental friendliness of accumulators/batteries and the economic benefits of their use. The results of the analyses provide an understanding of the factors of using existing technologies with regard to their technical and economic aspects for use in solar energy. It was determined that the most common and predominant types of energy storage are lithium-ion and pumped storage plants. Such accumulation systems guarantee high efficiency and reliability in the operation of solar installation systems, depending on the scale of the solar station. Storage devices that are beginning to gain interest in research are also considered – storage devices made of ceramics of various kinds and thermochemical and liquid-air technologies. This study contributes to the development of an energy-storage system for renewable energy sources in the field of technical and economic optimization.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Anzhela A. Barsegyan
1
ORCID: ORCID
Irina R. Baghdasaryan
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Architecture, Energetics and Water Systems, Shushi University of Technology, Stepanakert, Armenia
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper presents the scope of the international curriculum developed under the MOOC4ALL project financed by the Erasmus Plus Strategic Partnerships Program for the MOOC platform https://platform.mooc4all.eu/. The project partners were research units and non-profit organizations from Germany, Poland, Romania and Hungary. Developed under the project, the curricula covers topics in the “green area” such as renewable energy sources, waste management and sustainable development. Research conducted in the consortium countries has demonstrated the need to create online courses in these subject areas to respond to market demand and achieve the goals of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Green education is essential for safeguarding a sustainable world, maintaining it and preserving it for future generations. Currently, in times of climate crisis, increasing public awareness through non-formal education is of key importance. In the field of education, MOOCs have attracted a lot of attention as tools for open distance learning in the last decade. They make it possible to use the potential of new technologies in the didactic process and enable a reduction in the differences between developing and developed countries thanks to new interactive digital learning channels, which transpired to be particularly important during the Covid- 19 pandemic. The online courses developed as part of the project are available to participants free of charge in five languages – English, German, Polish, Romanian and Hungarian.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Aleksandra Kasztelewicz
1
ORCID: ORCID
Barbara Tomaszewska
1
ORCID: ORCID
Susanne Rahner
2
Ilona Winter
2
Volker Voss
2

  1. Department of Renewable Energy and Environmental Research, Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
  2. UBB e.V., Germany
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The agrarian process includes many industrial phenomena and events. The goal of economics as a science is to precisely detect and describe the relationships between various market mechanisms. These phenomena can be presented as the desire “to describe reality in terms of systems, their components and relationships, both between components of the system and between different systems” (Jankowski 1997). The energy sector is a special field among many areas of the national economy, and the products of this sector have a major impact on the branches of the economy and the mechanisms of action occurring in them. The publication is devoted to the construction of a mathematical model used to support the energy policy of local government units. The aim of the study is to build a mathematical model of energy production, taking the development potential of renewable energy into account, as well as to propose the desired direction of energy policy development in the analyzed periods to the regional authorities and to offer a model for creating an energy policy in other local government units: poviats, communes. Until now, few authors have comprehensively dealt with this issue. To date, no detailed research has been published on issues related to renewable energy development and the use of mathematical methods in the construction of the energy production model in local government units. The undertaken research is a contribution to the development of knowledge about alternative energy sources in the energy margin.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marcin Rabe
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The constant increase in the popularity of renewable energy systems allows residential building users to apply solutions leading to the diversification of the energy supply. The use of RES systems in residential buildings not only contributes to a higher level of environmental care, but also significantly and measurably improves the energy efficiency of the facility. Using hybrid systems allows the supply to be reduced or eliminated from conventional energy sources. The article presents common layouts of renewable energy systems, which are successfully used in residential buildings. It also shows the impact of such systems on the amount of savings achieved in the use of energy from external or conventional sources. In residential buildings, the possibility of energy generation in the form of electricity and heat is dependent on many factors that determine the type and size of the systems used to obtain energy from renewable sources. We should assume the further and continuous development of RES, which will increase the share of electricity and heat produced in households. Technological development, decreasing prices of equipment and components used for the installation of green electricity generation systems will be a conducive factor for increasing the popularity of RES systems, not only for residential buildings but also for other types of buildings. The article also points out the economic aspect of the RES systems application. It presents the positive impact of RES installations on the environment and estimates the average time of financial reimbursement. The economic analysis concerns individual systems of renewable energy systems used in residential buildings.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Sławomir Sowa

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more