How to search?
advanced search

Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Authors
  • Keywords
  • Date
  • Type

Search results

Number of results: 14
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:

Social Capital as a Factor Determining Territorial Development

Danuta Stawasz
Studia KPZK | 2018 | tom 184 Rozwój lokalny i regionalny. Teorie i zastosowania | 151-163
Keywords Social capital social capital impact
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The concept of social capital is gaining increasing popularity among economists and governance practitioners. This is due to the recognition of the fact that a high level of social capital is important for the creation of socio-economic development of countries or territories – economic areas with a high level of connections between entities, organisations and residents. The formation of social capital, understood as the ability to cooperate with various social groups and operate efficiently within these groups, depends on the political system as well as the adopted norms and attitudes, education, styles of management in business organisations and public sphere entities, family ties, motivation to act, etc. The aim of the paper is to indicate various limitations of social capital development and to demonstrate that it is important to involve different communities in its formation In addition, attention is drawn to the fact that social capital generates externalities that are essential for the efficiency and eff ectiveness of governance in territorial systems, both in the economic and public utility sphere.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Danuta Stawasz

Trust as a Social Capital: A Critical Input Underlying Economic Growth an Educational Development. An Indian Experience

Ali Nisar
Rocznik Pedagogiczny | 2014 | Tom 37
Keywords social capital India higher education knowledge society
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aim of the article is to discuss the issue of academic revolution in India. Particularly since the globalization, this revolotion is marked by transformation unprecedented in scope and diversity and education particularly higher education is profoundly influenced by the new order. However, it remains unfinished task due adequate statutory support of the government. In Indian context the national aspirations, to establish knowledge society in the context of increasing globalization, is based on the assumption that higher and technical education essentially empower people with requisite competitive skills and knowledge. The emerging trends demonstrate consumer driven approach to enhance marginal capital gains in educational investment. The higher education being a powerful tool to build knowledge based society and also a critical input underlying sustainable development has received a significant attention nowadays.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ali Nisar

The Impact of Social Capital on Political Participation of Social Media Users in Poland

Kamil Filipek
Studia Socjologiczne | 2019 | No 2 | 155-177 | DOI: 10.24425/sts.2019.126143
Keywords resources social capital social media political participation
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Research on participation of social media users has contributed to our understanding of modern citizenship, civic engagement, and contemporary public sphere. Despite a growing interest in participatory practices in social media little is known about the factors affecting political participation of social media users. Based on an online survey of 700 social media users in Poland, this study examines the relationship between social capital (defined at the individual level as a resource embedded in personal networks) and political participation. It has been established that there is a contradictory relationship between social capital and participatory activities of social media users. Apparently, differences between the resources that are only embedded in personal networks on the one hand, and those that can be mobilized for purposive actions on the other, matter when association between social capital and political participation is considered. Moreover, the presence of these resources significantly varies across different types of social relations (family, friends and acquaintances) of respondents engaged in different participatory actions.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Kamil Filipek

Świadomość ekologiczna i kapitał społeczny a wdrażanie zrównoważonego rozwoju

Paulina Legutko-Kobus
Studia KPZK | 2017 | No 178
Keywords ecological awareness homo cooperativus social capital sustainable development
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Ecological Awareness and Social Capital and Implementation of Sustainable Development. The importance of social commitment to sustainable development and the need of forming of the homo cooperativus attitude are underlined in the principles of sustainable economics. Environmental awareness and social capital are two key factors that influence the implementation of sustainable development. The main aim of the article is to analyze of both concepts definitions and to indicate the relationship between them. It also classifies social attitudes resulting from the level of social capital and ecological awareness.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Paulina Legutko-Kobus
ORCID: ORCID

It Matters Whom You Know: Mapping the Links Between Social Capital, Trust and Willingness to Cooperate

Katarzyna Growiec Jakub Growiec Bogumił Kamiński
Studia Socjologiczne | 2022 | No 2 | 59-83 | DOI: 10.24425/sts.2022.141423
Keywords social capital social network structure social trust willingness to cooperate
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Trust and willingness to cooperate depend on the structure of one’s social network and the resources one can access through it. In this study, based on a survey dataset of a representative sample of the Polish population (n = 1000) we create an empirical ‘map’ of four distinct dimensions of social capital: degree (number of social ties), centrality in the social network, bridging social capital (ties with dissimilar others), and bonding social capital (ties with similar others, primarily with kin). We investigate the links between social capital and its key correlates: generalized and particularized trust and willingness to cooperate. We find that centrality (or occupying the position of a network bridge) is positively related to trust, whereas for bonding social capital this relation is negative. We find also a puzzling effect of cooperation without trust in the case of individuals with high bridging social capital resources (ties with dissimilar others).
Go to article

Bibliography

1. Alesina, Alberto, Paola Giuliano. 2010. The Power of the Family. Journal of Economic Growth, 15: 93–125. DOI: 10.1007/s10887-010-9052-z.
2. Algan, Yann, Pierre Cahuc. 2010. Inherited Trust and Growth. American Economic Review, 100: 2060–2092. DOI: 10.1257/aer.100.5.2060.
3. Banfield, Edward C. 1958. Moral Basis of a Backward Society. Glencoe: Free Press.
4. Barber, Bernard. 1983. The Logic and Limits of Trust. Rutgers University Press.
5. Beugelsdijk, Sjoerd, Sjak Smulders. 2003. Bonding and Bridging Social Capital: Which Type Is Good for Economic Growth? In: The Cultural Diversity Of European Unity, ed. W. Arts, L. Halman, J. Hagenaars. Brill (Leiden), 147–184.
6. Bian, Yanjie. 1997. Bridging Strong Ties Back In: Indirect Ties, Network Bridges, and Job Searches in China. American Sociological Review, 62: 366–385. DOI: 10.2307/2657311.
7. Bjørnskov, Christian. 2006. The Multiple Facets of Social Capital. European Journal of Political Economy, 22: 22–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2005.05.006.
8. Bjørnskov, Christian, Kim M. Sønderskov. 2013. Is Social Capital A Good Concept? Social Indicators Research, 114: 1225–1242. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-012-0199-1.
9. Bonacich, Phillip. 1972. Technique For Analyzing Overlapping Memberships. Sociological Methodology, 4: 176–185.
10. Bonacich, Phillip. 1987. Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures. American Journal Of Sociology, 92: 1170–1182.
11. Borgatti, Stephen P. 2006. Identifying Sets of Key Players in a Social Network. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 12: 21–34. DOI: 10.1007/s10588-006-7084-x.
12. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. The Forms Of Capital. In: Handbook of Theory and Research of Sociology of Education, Ed. by J. C. Richardson. Greenwood Press, 117–142.
13. Bowlby, John. 1969. Attachment. The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis.
14. Burt, Ronald S. 1992. Structural Holes. The Social Structure And Competition. Harvard University Press.
15. Burt, Ronald S. 2005. Brokerage and Closure. An Introduction to Social Capital. Oxford University Press.
16. Burt, Ronald S. 2010. Neighbor Networks: Competitive Advantage Local And Personal. Oxford University Press.
17. Butler, Jeff V., Paola Giuliano, Luigi Guiso. 2016. The Right Amount of Trust. Journal of the European Economic Association, 14: 1155–1180. DOI: 10.1111/jeea.12178.
18. Dasgupta, Partha. 1988. Trust as a Commodity. In: Trust. Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Ed. by D. Gambetta. New York: Basil Blackwell, 49–72.
19. De Cremer, David, Mark Snyder, Siegfried Dewitte. 2001. ‘The Less I Trust, The Less I Contribute (Or Not)?’ The Effects of Trust, Accountability and Self-Monitoring in Social Dilemmas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31: 93–107. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.34.
20. Ermisch, John, Diego Gambetta. 2010. Do Strong Family Ties Inhibit Trust? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 75: 365–376. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2010.05.007.
21. Festinger, Leon, Stanley Schachter, Kurt W. Back. 1948. Social Pressures In Informal Groups. Cambridge: MIT Press.
22. Field, John. 2010. Social Capital. Routledge.
23. Florida, Richard. 2004. The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books.
24. Franzen, Axel, Dominik Hangartner. 2006. Social Networks and Labour Market Outcomes: The Non-Monetary Benefits of Social Capital. European Sociological Review, 22: 353–368. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcl001.
25. Gambetta, Diego. 1988. Mafia: The Price of Distrust. In: Trust. Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Ed. by D. Gambetta. Basil Blackwell, 158–175.
26. Gellner, Ernest. 1988. Trust, Cohesion and the Social Order. In: Trust. Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Ed. by D. Gambetta. Basil Blackwell, 142–157.
27. Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
28. Gittell, Ross J., Avis Vidal. 1998. Community Organizing: Building Social Capital as a Development Strategy. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
29. Granovetter, Mark S. 2005. The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19: 33–50. DOI: 10.1257/0895330053147958.
30. Greenberg, Jay R. 1991. Oedipus And Beyond: A Clinical Theory. Harvard University Press.
31. Growiec, Jakub, Katarzyna Growiec. 2010. Social Capital, Well-Being, and Earnings: Theory and Evidence From Poland. European Societies, 12: 231–255. DOI: 10.1080/14616690902718381.
32. Growiec, Katarzyna. 2015. Ile szczęścia dają nam inni ludzie? Więzi społeczne a dobrostan psychiczny [How Much Happiness Do Others Give Us? Social Ties And Well-Being]. Warszawa: WN PWN.
33. Growiec, Katarzyna, Jakub Growiec. 2014a. Social Capital, Trust, and Multiple Equilibria in Economic Performance. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 18: 282–315. DOI: 10.1017/S136510051200034X.
34. Growiec, Katarzyna, Jakub Growiec. 2014b. Trusting Only Whom You Know, Knowing Only Whom You Trust: The Joint Impact of Social Capital and Trust on Individuals’ Economic Performance and Happiness in CEE Countries. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15: 1015–1040. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-013-9461-8.
35. Growiec, Katarzyna, Jakub Growiec, Bogumił Kamiński. 2018. Social Network Structure and the Trade-Off Between Social Utility and Economic Performance. Social Networks, 55: 31–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2018.05.002.
36. Hurlbert, Jeanne S., Valerie A. Haines, John J. Beggs. 2000. Core Networks and Tie Activation: What Kinds of Routine Networks Allocate Resources in Nonroutine Situations? American Sociological Review, 65: 598–618. DOI: 10.2307/2657385.
37. Inglehart, Ronald, Wayne Baker. 2000. Modernization, Cultural Change and the Persistence of Traditional Values. American Sociological Review, 65: 19–51. DOI: 10.2307/2657288
38. Kääriäinen, Juha, Heikki Lehtonen. 2006. The Variety of Social Capital in Welfare State Regimes – A Comparative Study of 21 Countries. European Societies, 8: 27–57. DOI: 10.1080/14616690500491399.
39. Kadushin, Charles. 2002. The Motivational Foundation of Social Networks. Social Networks, 24: 77–91. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-8733(01)00052-1.
40. Kadushin, Charles. 2012. Understanding Social Networks: Theories, Concepts, And Findings. Oxford University Press.
41. Klapwijk, Anthon, Paul A. M. Van Lange. 2009. Promoting Cooperation and Trust in ‘Noisy’ Situations: The Power of Generosity. Journal of Personality And Social Psychology, 96: 83–103. DOI: 10.1037/a0012823.
42. Knack, Stephen, Philip Keefer. 1997. Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112: 1251–1288. DOI: 10.1162/003355300555475.
43. Kroll, Christian. 2011. Different Things Make Different People Happy: Examining Social Capital and Subjective Well-Being by Gender and Parental Status. Social Indicators Research, 104: 157–177. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-010-9733-1.
44. Lawrence, Barbara S. 1997. The Black Box of Organizational Demography. Organization Science, 8: 1–22. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.8.1.1.
45. Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Robert K. Merton. 1954. Friendship as Social Process: ASubstantive and Methodological Analysis. In: M. Berger, T. Abel, C.H. Page, eds. Freedom and Control in Modern Society. New York: Van Nostrand, 18–66.
46. Leonard, Madeleine. 2008. Socialand Subcultural CapitalAmong Teenagersin Northern Ireland. Youth and Society, 40: 224–244. DOI: 10.1177/0044118X08314243.
47. Leung, Ambrose, Cheryl Kier, Tak Fung, Linda Fung, Robert Sproule. 2011. Searching for Happiness: The Importance of Social Capital. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12: 443–462. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-010-9208-8.
48. Lewis, J. David, Andrew Weigert. 1985. Trust as a Social Reality. Social Forces, 63: 967–985.
49. Li, Yaojun, Andrew Pickles, Mike Savage. 2005. Social Capital and Social Trust in Britain. European Sociological Review, 21: 109–123. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jci007.
50. Lin, Nan. 2001. Social Capital. Cambridge University Press.
51. Luhmann, Niklas. 1979. Trust and Power. Chichester: Wiley.
52. Meeussen, Loes, Filip Agneessens, Ellen Delvaux, Karen Phalet. 2018. Ethnic Diversity and Value Sharing: A Longitudinal Social Network Perspective on Interactive Group Processes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57: 428–447. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12237.
53. Misztal, Barbara. 1996. Trust in Modern Societies. The Search for the Bases of Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
54. Mouw, Ted. 2003. Social Capital and Finding a Job: Do Contacts Matter? American Sociological Review, 68: 868–898. DOI: 10.2307/1519749.
55. Paldam, Martin. 2000. Social Capital: One or Many? Definition and Measurement. Journal of Economic Surveys, 14: 629–654. DOI: 10.1111/1467-6419.00127.
56. Prell, Christina. 2012. Social Network Analysis. History, Theory and Methodology. Sage.
57. Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone. Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
58. Rainie, Lee, Barry Wellman. 2014. Networked: The New Social Operating System. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
59. Sabatini, Fabio. 2009. Social Capital as Social Networks: A New Framework for Measurement and an Empirical Analysis of Its Determinants and Consequences. Journal of Socio-Economics, 38: 429–442. DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2008.06.001.
60. Sandefur, Rebecca L., Edward O. Laumann. 1998. A Paradigm for Social Capital. Rationality and Society, 10: 481–501. DOI: 10.1177/104346398010004005.
61. Simmel, Georg. 1978. The Philosophy of Money [1900]. Routledge and Kagan Paul.
62. Snijders, Tom A. B. 1999. Prologue to the Measurement of Social Capital. La Revue Tocqueville/The Tocqueville Review, 20: 27–44. DOI: 10.3138/ttr.20.1.27.
63. Sobel, Joel. 2002. Can We Trust Social Capital? Journal of Economic Literature, 40: 139–154. DOI: 10.1257/0022051027001.
64. Sønderskov, Kim M. 2008. Environmental Group Membership, Collective Action and Generalised Trust. Environmental Politics, 17: 78–94. DOI: 10.1080/09644010701811673.
65. Tanis, Martin, Tom Postmes. 2005. A Social Identity Approach to Trust: Interpersonal Perception, Group Membership and Trusting Behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35: 413–424. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.256.
66. Tian, Felicia F., Nan Lin. 2016. Weak Ties, Strong Ties, and Job Mobility In Urban China: 1978–2008. Social Networks, 44: 117–129. DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2015.08.002.
67. Uslaner, Eric M. 2002. The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge University Press.
68. Valente, Thomas W., Kayo Fujimoto. 2010. Bridging: Locating Critical Connectors in a Network. Social Networks, 32: 212–220. DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2010.03.003.
69. Van der Gaag, Martin, Tom A. B. Snijders. 2005. The Resource Generator: Social Capital Quantification with Concrete Items. Social Networks, 27: 1–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2004.10.001.
70. Van der Gaag, Martin, Tom A. B. Snijders, Henk D. Flap. 2012. Position Generator Measures and Their Relationship to Other Social Capital Measures. In: Social Capital. An International Research Program. Ed. by N. Lin and B. H. Erickson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 27–48.
71. Van der Horst, Mariska, Hilde Coffé. 2012. How Friendship Network Characteristics Influence Subjective Well-Being. Social Indicators Research, 107: 509–529. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-011-9861-2.
72. Van Oorschot, Wim, Wil Arts, John Gelissen. 2006. Social Capital in Europe. Measurement and Social and Regional Distribution of a Multifaceted Phenomenon. Acta Sociologica, 49: 149–167. DOI: 10.1177/0001699306064770.
73. Winkelmann, Rainer. 2009. Unemployment, Social Capital, and Subjective Well-Being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10: 421–430. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-0089097-2.
74. Woolcock, Michael. 1998. Social Capital and Economic Development: Towards a Theoretical Synthesis and Policy Framework. Theory and Society, 27–28: 151–208. DOI: 10.1023/A:1006884930135.
75. Woolcock, Michael. 2001. The Place of Social Capital in Understanding Social and Economic Outcomes. Isuma: Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2: 11–17.
76. Xin, Sufei, Ziqiang Xin, Chongde Lin. 2016. Effects of Trustors’ Social Identity Complexity on Interpersonal and Intergroup Trust. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46: 428–440. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2156.
77. Yamagishi, Toshio, Karen S. Cook, Motoki Watabe. 1998. Uncertainty, Trust, and Commitment Formation in The United States and Japan. American Journal of Sociology, 104: 165–194. DOI: 10.1086/210005.
78. Zak, Paul J., Stephen Knack. 2001. Trust and Growth. Economic Journal, 111: 295–321. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0297.00609.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Katarzyna Growiec
1
ORCID: ORCID
Jakub Growiec
2
ORCID: ORCID
Bogumił Kamiński
2
ORCID: ORCID
  1. SWPS Uniwersytet Humanistycznospołeczny
  2. Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie

Social Services Co-production as a Source of the Personal and Social Productivity Among the Older People – a Conceptual Model Proposal

Grzegorz Gawron
Studia Socjologiczne | 2022 | No 4 | 129-152 | DOI: 10.24425/sts.2022.143585
Keywords co-production productive aging social services human and social capital
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

While the notions of social services co-production and older people productivity have already been employed in the academic literature independently of one another, the relationship between the two has not been established yet. The article proposes a pioneering conceptual model that combines these two issues. Since the proposal is novel, the article introduces the concepts that allow to operationalize the model as well as the graphic diagram that explains the relationships between these concepts. The article presents social services co-production as a potential source of the personal and social productivity among the older people generated by the use of their human and social capital. Its aim is to stimulate a debate on this crucial topic and invite for a further development of the proposed conceptual model.
Go to article

Bibliography

1. Abeysekera, Ruwan. 2015. Concepts and Implications of Theory of Co-production. Colombo Business Journal, 06, 2: 22–38. DOI: 10.4038/cbj.v6i2.26.
2. Alford, John. 1998. A public management road less traveled: clients as co-producers of public services. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 57: 128–137. DOI: 10.1111/j. 1467-8500.1998.tb01568.x
3. Alford, John. 2002. Why do public sector clients co-produce? Towards a contingency theory . Administration & Society, 34, 1: 32–56. DOI: 10.1177%2F0095399702034001004.
4. Alford, John, Sophie Yates. 2015. Co-production of public services in Australia: The Roles of Government Organisations and Co-producers. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 75: 159–175. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8500.12157.
5. Andrews, Rhys, Gena A. Brewer. 2013. Social Capital, Management Capacity and Public Service Performance Evidence from the US States. Public Management Review, 15, 1: 19–42. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2012.662445.
6. Bailey, Stephen J. 2011. The evolving governance of public services in England: Extending competition, choice, co-design and co-production. Innovation and the Public Sector, 15: 68–88. DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-727-7-68.
7. Bartkowski, Jerzy. 2007. Kapitał społeczny i jego oddziaływanie na rozwój w ujęciu socjologicznym. In: M. Herbst, eds. Kapitał ludzki i kapitał społeczny a rozwój regionalny. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, 54–97.
8. Bendapudi, Neeli, Robert P. Leone. 2003. Psychological implications of customer participation in co-production. Journal of Marketing, 67, 1: 14–28. DOI: 10.1509%2Fjmkg.67.1.14.18592.
9. Białożyt, Krystyna. 2014. Produktywność osób starszych – czy produktywny jest tylko aktywny zawodowo senior? In: N.G. Pikuła, eds. Marginalizacja na rynku pracy: teorie i implikacje praktyczne. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Impuls, 87–102.
10. Bloom, David E., Dara L. Luca. 2016. The Global Demography of Aging: Facts, Explanations, Future, IZA. Discussion Paper, Institute for the Study of Labor, IZA DP, No. 10163. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2834213. Dostęp 17.07.2022.
11. Błędowski, Piotr, Barbara Szatur-Jaworska, Zofia Szweda-Lewandowska, Paweł Kubicki. 2012. Raport na temat sytuacji osób starszych w Polsce. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo IPSS.
12. Boudiny, Kim. 2013. Active ageing: From empty rhetoric to effective policy tool. Ageing & Society, 33, 6: 1077–1098. DOI: 10.1017/S0144686X1200030X.
13. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. The Forms of Capital. In: J. G. Richardson, eds. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New Jork: Springer, 241–258.
14. Bovaird, Tony. 2007. Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services. Public Administration Review, 67, 5: 846–860. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x.
15. Bovaird, Tony, Elke Löffler. 2009. User and community co-production of public services and public policies through collective decision-making: the role of emerging technologies. In: T. Brandsen, M. Holzer, Newark, eds. The Future of Governance. New York: NCPP, 231–251. DOI: 10.1177%2F0020852314566009.
16. Bovaird, Tony, Garry Stoker, Tricia Jones, Elke Löffler, Monica Roncancio. 2015. Activating collective co-production of public services: influencing citizens to participate in complex governance mechanisms in the UK. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82, 1: 47–68. DOI: 10.1177%2F0020852314566009.
17. Boyle, David, Michael Harris. 2009. The Challenge Of Co-Production. How equal partnerships between professionals and the public are crucial to improving public services. Discussion Paper, London: NESTA. https://neweconomics.org/uploads/files/312ac8ce93a00d5973_3im 6i6t0e.pdf. Dostęp: 17.07.2022.
18. Brandsen, Adalbert. 2006. Current Strands in Debating User Involvement in Social Services. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
19. Brandsen, Taco, Victor Pestoff. 2006. Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services. Public Management Review, 8, 4: 493–501. DOI: 10.1080/14719030601022874.
20. Brudney, Jeffrey, Robert England. 1983. Toward a definitione of the co-production concept. Public Administration Review, 43: 59–65. DOI: 10.2307/975300.
21. Butler, Rober Neil, Herbert Gleason. eds. 1985. Productive aging: Enhancing vitality in Later life. New Jork: Springer.
22. Butler, Robert, Mia Oberlink, Mal Schechter. eds. 1990. The promise of productive aging. New Jork: Springer.
23. Caldwell, Kay, Kate Coleman, Mohammed Saib. 2008. The ageing population: challenges for policy and practice. Diversity in Health and Social Care, 5, 1: 11–18.
24. Caro, Francis G., Scott A. Bass, Yung-Ping Chen. 1993. Introduction: Achiving a Productive Aging Society. In: S.A. Bass, F.G. Caro, Y-P. Chen, eds. Achiving a Productive Aging Society. London, Auburn House London, 3–25.
25. Carpiano, Richard M. 2007. Neighborhood social capital and adult health: an empirical test of a Bourdieu-based model. Health and Place, 13: 639–655. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace. 2006.09.001.
26. Ciepielewska-Kowalik, Anna. 2016. Koprodukcja w polityce opieki i edukacji przedszkolnej. Warszawa: Instytutu Studiów Politycznych Polskiej Akademii Nauk.
27. Clark, Benjamin Y., Jeffrey L. Brudney, Sung-Gheel Jang. 2013. Coproduction of government services and the new information technology: investigating the distributional biases. Public Administration Review, 73, 5: 687–701. DOI: 10.1111/puar.12092.
28. Clarke, Amanda, Lorna Warren. 2007. Hopes, fears and expectations about the future: what do older people’s stories tell us about active ageing? Ageing and Society, 27, 4: 465–488. DOI: 10.1017/S0144686X06005824.
29. Coleman, James S. 1988. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 86: 95–120.
30. Coleman, James S. 2012. The creation and destruction of social capital: implications for the law. Notre Dame Journal of Law Ethics Public Policy, 3: 375–404.
31. Co-production involving and led by older people. An Evidence and Practice Review. 2013, National Development Team for Inclusion, https://otbds.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/ NDTi_-_Coproductionandolderpeople.pdf. Access 12.03.2019.
32. Craig, Stephen C., Richard G. Niemi, Gleen E. Silver. 1990. Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items. Political Behavior, 12: 289–314. DOI: 10.1007/BF00992337.
33. De Witte, Kristof, Benny Geys. 2013. Citizen coproduction and efficient public good provision: theory and evidence from local public libraries. European Journal of Operational Research, 224, 3: 592–602. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.09.002.
34. Domański, Ryszard. 2000. Miasto innowacyjne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
35. Donatti, Christina, David Deans. 2016. Discussion Paper. Defining Productive Ageing – Engaging Consumers. Productive Ageing Centre. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255598155_Discussion_Paper_Defining_Productive_Ageing_-_Engaging_Consumers. Access 14.01.2018.
36. Dosman, Donna, Janet Fast, Sherry A. Chapman, Norah Keating. 2006. Retirement and Productive Activity in Later Life. Journal of Family & Economic Issues, 27: 401–419. DOI: 10.1007/s10834-006-9022-y.
37. Drucker, Peter F. 1992. The New Society of Organizations. Harvard Business Review, 70, 5: 95–104.
38. Drucker, Peter F. (translation Kranas, G.). 1999. Społeczeństwo pokapitalistyczne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
39. Działek, Jarosław. 2011. Kapitał społeczny – ujęcie teoretyczne i praktyka badawcza. Studia Regionalne i Lokalne, 3, 45: 100–118.
40. Europejski Komitet Ekonomiczno-Społeczny (EKES). 2013. Opinia Europejskiego Komitetu Ekonomiczno-Społecznego w sprawie wkładu osób starszych w życie społeczne i ich udziału w nim (opinia z inicjatywy własnej). Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej Seria C 11/04 z 15 stycznia 2013. file:///C:/Users/Ja/AppData/Local/Temp/2013_c_011_c_01120130115pl00160020.pdf.pdf Access 12.12.2019.
41. Feng, Qiushi, Paulin Tay Straughan. 2017. What does successful aging mean? Lay perception of successful aging among Singapore elderly. Journal of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 72, 2: 204–213. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbw151.
42. Fihel, Agnieszka, Marek Okólski. 2014. P rzemiany cywilizacyjne, ludnościowe i starzenie się społeczeństw Koncepcja teoretyczna projektu MIG/AGEING. Poznań: Ośrodek Badań nad Migracjami, Uniwersytet Warszawski nad Migracjami, Uniwersytet Warszawski. http://migageing.uw.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/sites/36/2014/12/SiM_01.pdf. Access 14.07.2022.
43. Filipe, Angela, Alicia Renedo, Cicely Marston. 2017. The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care. PLoS Biol, 15, 5. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403.
44. Fitzpatrick, Tony, Huck-ju Kwon, Nick Manning, James Midgley, Gillian Pascall. 2006. International Encyclopedia of Social Policy. Routledge.
45. Foster, Liam, Alan Walker. 2015. Active and successful aging: A European policy perspective. The Gerontologist, 55, 1: 83–90. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnu028.
46. Frederickson, George H. 1996. Comparing the reinventing government movement with the new public administration. Public Administration Review, 43: 263–270. DOI: 10.2307/976450.
47. Gannon, Zoe, Neal Lawson. 2008. Co-production: the modernisation of public services by staff and users. London: Compass. https://www.compassonline.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/CO-PRODUCTION.pdf. Access 17.07.2021.
48. Gawron, Grzegorz. 2017. Senioralna koprodukcja? analiza wybranych przypadków lokalnych inicjatyw na rzecz seniorów w krajach o niskich i średnich dochodach. Praca Socjalna, 5: 29–53. DOI: 10.7366/1509499548204.
49. Gawron, Grzegorz. 2020. Srebrna koprodukcja – analiza inicjatyw lokalnych na rzecz osób starszych w wybranych krajach rozwijających się. Studia Regionalne i Lokalne, 4, 82: 76–95. DOI: 10.7366/1509499548204.
50. Gawron, Grzegorz, Andrzej Klimczuk, Zofia Szweda-Lewandowska. 2021. Starzenie się populacji. Aktywizacja, koprodukcja i integracja społeczna osób starszych. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego w Katowicach. https://wydawnictwo.us.edu.pl/sites/wydawnictwo.us.edu.pl/files/wus_2021_gawron_klimczuk_szweda-lewandowska_starzenie_sie_populacji_ebook.pdf. Access 15.12.2021.
51. Gee, Elen, Gloria Gutman, eds. 2000. The Overselling of Population Aging: Apocalyptic Demography, Intergenerational Challenges and Social Policy. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
52. Golder, Peter N., Debanjan Mitra, Christine Moorman. 2012. What Is Quality? An Integrative Framework of Processes and States. Journal of Marketing, 76, 4: 1–23.
53. Goldschmidt-Clermont, Luisella, Elisabetta Pagnossin-Aligisakis. 1995. Measures of Unrecorded Economic Activities in Fourteen Countries. Human Development Report Office. https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents//luisellagoldschmidt-clermontpdf.pdf. Access 19.07.2021.
54. Golinowska, Stanisława. 2012. Srebrna gospodarka – ekonomiczny wymiar procesu starzenia się populacji. In: Strategie działania w starzejącym się społeczeństwie. Tezy i rekomendacje. Warszawa, Biuro Rzecznika Praw Obywatelskich, 133–147. https://www.brpo.gov.pl/sites/default/files/13541772380.pdf. Access 19.07.2021.
55. Grewiński Mirosław. 2013. Usługi społeczne i socjalne jako wspólny obszar polityki i ekonomii społecznej. Ekonomia Społeczna, 3, 8: 24–39.
56. Halvorsen, Kathleen. E. 2003. Assessing the effects of public participation. Public Administration Review, 63, 5: 535–543. DOI: 10.1111/1540-6210.00317.
57. Hamm, Bernd. 2004. Kapitał społeczny z punktu widzenia socjologicznego. In: L. Frąckiewicz, A. Rączaszka, eds. Kapitał społeczny. Katowic: Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach, 49–60.
58. Herian, Mitchel N., Joseph A. Hamm, Alan J. Tomkins, Lisa P. Zillig. 2012. Public Participation, Procedural Fairness, and Evaluations of Local Governance: The Moderating Role of Uncertainty. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 4: 815–840. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mur064.
59. Herzog, Anna Regula, James N. Morgan. 1992. Age and gender differences in the value of productive activities. Research on Aging, 14, 2: 169–198. DOI: 10.1177%2F0164027592142002.
60. Hinterlong, James, Nancy Morrow-Howell, Michael Sherraden. 2001. Productive Aging: Principles and Perspective. In: N. Morrow-Howell, J. Hinterlong, M. Sherraden, eds. Productive Aging. Concepts and Challenges. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 3–18.
61. Irvin, Renee. A., John Stansbury. 2004. Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64, 1: 55–65. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x.
62. Jackson, James S. 2001. Changes over the Life Course in Productive Activities: Comparison of Black and White Populations. In: N. Morrow-Howell, J. Hinterlong, M. Sherraden, eds. Productive Aging. Concepts and Challenges. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 214–244.
63. Jakobsen, Morten. 2012. Can government initiatives increase citizen coproduction? Results of a randomized field experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23, 1: 27–54. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mus036.
64. Jakobsen, Morten, Simon C. Andersen. 2013. Co-production and Equity in Public Service Delivery. Public Administration Review, 2013, 73: 704–713. DOI: 10.1111/puar.12094.
65. Kaye, Lenard W., Sandra S. Butler, Nancy M. Webster. 2003. Toward a productive aging paradigm for geriatric practice. Ageing International, 28, 2: 200–213. DOI: 10.1007/s12126-003-1024-6.
66. Kaźmierczak, Tomasz. 2011. Partycypacja publiczna: obywatel jako koproducent usług publicznych. In: A. Olech ed. Partycypacja publiczna. O uczestnictwie w życiu wspólnoty lokalnej. Warszawa: Instytut Spraw Publicznych, Fundacja Instytut Spraw Publicznych, 175–191.
67. Kaźmierczak, Tomasz. 2012. Koprodukcja, czyli „prawo do miasta” w działaniu – jak poprawić partycypację publiczną przez udział obywateli w świadczeniu usług publicznych. Warszawa: Instytut Spraw Publicznych, Analizy i opinie nr 2.
68. Kaźmierczak, Tomasz. 2014. Koprodukcja usług publicznych (koncepcja, badania, rola w świadczeniu usług adresowanych do osób wykluczonych społecznie, warunki upowszechnienia. http://www.eapn.org.pl/wpcontent/uploads/2014/06/EAPN_ekspertyza_TK.pdf. Access 15.08.2018.
69. Khine, Pwint Kay, Jianing Mi, Raza Shahid. 2021. A Comparative Analysis of Co-Production in Public Services. Sustainability, 13,12. DOI: 10.3390/su13126730.
70. Kim, Soonhee, Jooho Lee. 2012. E-Participation, Transparency, and Trust in Local Government. Public Administration Review, 72, 6: 819–828. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02593.x.
71. Klein, Peter G., Michael L. Cook. 2006. T.W. Schultz and the Human-Capital Approach to Entrepreneurship. Review of Agricultural Economics, 28, 3: 344–350.
72. Klimczuk, Andrzej. 2012. Kapitał społeczny ludzi starych na przykładzie mieszkańców miasta Białystok. Białystok: Wydawnictwo Wiedza i Edukacja.
73. Król, Henryk. 2006. Istota rozwoju kapitału ludzkiego organizacji. In: H. Król, A. Ludwiczyński, eds. Zarządzanie zasobami ludzkimi. Tworzenie kapitału ludzkiego organizacji. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 423–451.
74. Kunasz, Marek. 2004. Teoria kapitału ludzkiego na tle dorobku myśli ekonomicznej. In: A. Manikowski, A. Psyk, eds. Unifikacja gospodarek europejskich: szanse i zagrożenia. Warszawa: Uniwersytet Warszawski, 433–442.
75. Krzyszkowski, Jerzy. 2015. Wzrost znaczenia usług społecznych w czasach wyzwania demograficznego. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Oeconomica, 2, 312: 9–24. http://hdl.handle.net/11089/15533.
76. Krzyżowski Łukasz, Wojciech Kowalik, Katarzyna Suwada, Anna Pawlina. 2014. Młodzi emeryci w Polsce. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
77. Levine, Charles H., George Fisher. 1984. Citizenship and service delivery: the promise of co-production. Public Administration Review, 44: 178–189. DOI: 10.2307/975559.
78. Ma, Liang, Xia Wu. 2019.Citizen engagement and co-production of e-government services in China. Journal of Chinese Government, 2019, 5: 1–22. DOI: 10.1080/23812346.2019.1705052.
79. Martinson, Marty, Clara Berridge. 2015. Successful aging and its discontents: A systematic review of the social gerontology literature, The Gerontologist, 55, 1: 58–69. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnu037.
80. McDonald, Scott, Jennifer Roberts. 2002. Growth and multiple forms of human capital in an augmented Solow model: a panel data investigation. Economic Letters, 74: 271–276. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00539-0.
81. Morrow-Howell, Nancy, Emily Greenfield. 2016. Productive engagement in later life. In: L. K. George, K. F. Ferraro eds. Handbook of aging and the social sciences. San Diego: Academic Press, 293–313.
82. Narushima, Miya, Jian Liu, Naomi Distelkamp. 2018. Lifelong learning in active aging discourse: its conserving effect on wellbeing, health and vulnerability. Ageing and Society, 38, 4: 651–675. DOI: 10.1017/S0144686X16001136.
83. Needham, Catherine. 2008. Realising the Potential of Co-production: Negotiating Improvements in Public Services. Journal of Social Policy and Society, 7, 2: 221–231. DOI: 10.1017/S1474746407004174.
84. Needham, Catherine, Sarah Carr. 2009. SCIE Research briefing 31: co-production: an emerging evidence base for adult social care transformation. Social Care Institute for Excellence.
85. Neshkova, Milena I., Hai Guo. 2012. Public Participation and Organizational Performance: Evidence from State Agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 2: 267–288. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mur038.
86. Nitrini, Ricardo. 2011. Successful aging in Brazil. Arq Neuropsiquiatr, 69, 4: 577–578. DOI: 10.1590/s0004-282x2011000500001.
87. Ogura Seiritsu., Michael Jakovljevic. 2018. Editorial: Global population aging – health care, social and economic consequences. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, 335. www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00335/full. Access 17.07.2022.
88. Osborne, Stephen P. 2010. Delivering public services: time for a new theory? Public Management Review, 12: 1–10. DOI: 10.1080/14719030903495232.
89. Osborne, Stephen P., Kirsty Strokosch. 2013. It takes Two to Tango? Understanding the Co-production of Public Services by Integrating the Services Management and Public Administration Perspectives. British Journal of Management, 24: 31–47. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.12010.
90. Ostrom, Vincent, Elinor Ostrom. 1971. Public Choice: A Different Approach to the Study of Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 31, 2: 203–216. DOI: 10.2307/974676.
91. Ostrom, Elinor. 1972. Metropolitan reform: propositions derived from two traditions. Social Science Quarterly, 53: 474–493. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42860228.
92. Ostrom, Elinor. 1996. Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy and development. World Development, 24, 6: 1073–1087. DOI: 10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X.
93. Ostrom, Elinor. 1999. Crossing the Great Divide: Coproduction, Synergy, and Development. In: M.D. McGinnis, eds. Polycentric Governance and Development. Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
94. Ostrom, Elinor. 2000. Crowding out citizenship. Scandinavian Political Studies, 23, 1: 1–16. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9477.00028.
95. Parks, Roger B., Paula C. Baker, Larry Kiser, Roland Oakerson, Elinor Ostrom, Vincent Ostrom, Stephen L. Percy, Martha B. Vandivort, Gordon P. Whitaker, Rick Wilson. 1981. Consumers As Coproducers Of Public Services: Some Economic And Institutional Considerations. Policy Studies Journal, 9, 7: 1001–1011. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1981.tb01208.x.
96. Parrado, Salvador, Gregg G. Van Ryzin, Tony Bovaird, Elke Loffler. 2013. Correlates of co-production: Evidence from a five-nation survey of citizens. International Public Management Journal, 16, 1: 85–112. DOI: 10.1080/10967494.2013.796260.
97. Peng, Du, Wang Fei. 2013. Productive ageing in China: Development of concepts and policy practice. Ageing International, 38,4: 4–14. DOI: 10.1007/s12126-012-9169-9.
98. Pestoff, Victor. 2006. Citizens and co-production of welfare services – Childcare in eight European countries. Public Management Review, 8, 4: 503–519. DOI: 10.1080/1471 9030601022882.
99. Pestoff, Victor, Stephen P., Osborne, Taco Brandsen. 2006. Patterns of co-production in public services: Some concluding thoughts. Public Management Review, 8, 4: 591–595. DOI: 10.1080/14719030601022999.
100. Pestoff, Victor. 2011. Co-production, new public governance and third sector social services in Europe. Ciências Sociais Unisinos, 47, 1: 15–24. DOI: 10.4013/csu.2011.47.1.0.
101. Pestoff, Victor. 2012. Co-production and Third Sector Social Services in Europe: Some Concepts and Evidence. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23: 1102–1118. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-012-9308-7.
102. Piekut-Brodzka, Danuta M. 2004. Kapitał ludzki i inwestycje w ludzkie istnienie oraz kapitał społeczny a praca socjalna. In: L. Frąckiewicz, A. Rączaszka, eds. Kapitał społeczny. Katowice: Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach, 201–212.
103. Putnam, Robert D. 1993. The Prosperous Community. Social Capital and Public Life. The American Prospect, 3, 35–42.
104. Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Touchstone Books.
105. Radnor, Zoe, Stephen P. Osborne, Tony Kinder, Jean Mutton. 2013. Operationalizing Co-production in Public Service Delivery: The contribution of service blueprinting. Public Management Review, 16, 3: 402–423. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2013.848923.
106. Reinhard, Wolfgang. 2009. Życie po europejsku. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
107. Rich, Richard C. 1981. Interaction of the voluntary and governmental sectors: Toward an understanding of the co-production of municipal services. Administration and Society, 13: 59–76. DOI: 10.1177%2F009539978101300104.
108. Robinson, Mark, Gordon White. 1997. The Role of Civil Organizations in the Provision of Social Services. Towards Synergy. Research for Action 37, UNU World Institute for Development Economics Research.
109. Robison Lindon J., Allan A. Schmid, Marcelo E. Siles. 2002. Is social capital really capital? Review of Social Economy, 60, 1: 1–21. DOI: 10.1080/00346760110127074.
110. Rosentraub, Mark, Robert Warren. 1987. Citizen participation in the production of urban services. Public Productivity Review, 10: 75–89. DOI: 10.1177%2F004208168401900403.
111. Rowe, John W., Robert L. Kahn. 1998. Successful aging. New York: Pantheon/Random House.
112. Rutkowska, Anna. 2012. Istota kapitału ludzkiego i wybrane metody jego pomiaru. Zarządzanie i Finanse, 10.1, 3: 339–348.
113. Sadowski, Andrzej. 2006. Białystok. Kapitał społeczny mieszkańców miasta. Białystok: Wyższa Szkoła Ekonomii w Białymstoku.
114. Sharp, Eleine B. 1980: Toward a New Understanding of Urban Services and Citizen Participation: The Coproduction Concept. American Review of Public Administration, 14, 2: 105–118. DOI: 10.1177/027507408001400203.
115. Sicilia, Mariafrancesca, Enrico Guarini, Alesandro Sancino, Martino Andreani, Renato Ruffini. 2016. Public services management and co-production in multi-level governance settings. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82, 1: 8–27. DOI: 10.1177%2 F0020852314566008.
116. Silagi Marcela Lima, Camila Maia Rabelo, Eliane Schochat, Leticia Lessa Mansur. 2015. Healthy aging and compensation of sentence comprehension auditory deficits. BioMed Research Internationa. 640657. DOI: 10.1155/2015 /640657.
117. Sorrentino, Maddalena, Mariafrancesca Sicilia, Michael Howlett. 2018. Understanding co-production as a new public governance tool, policy and society. Policy and Society, 37, 3: 277–293. DOI: 10.1080/14494035.2018.1521676.
118. Starzenie się ludności w Unii Europejskiej – stan obecny i prognoza. 2018. Opracowania tematyczne (OT–662), Warszawa: Kancelaria Senatu, Biuro analiz, dokumentacji i korespondencji. https://www.senat.gov.pl/gfx/senat/pl/senatopracowania/160/plik/ot-662.pdf. Dostęp 18.07.2022.
119. Sześciło, Dawid. 2014. Współzarządzanie (zarządzanie partycypacyjne): teoria i praktyka. Administracja: teoria, dydaktyka, praktyka, 2, 35: 49–66.
120. Sześciło, Dawid. 2015a. Współzarządzanie a usługi publiczne. In: S. Mazur, eds. Współzarządzanie publiczne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, 286–302.
121. Sześciło, Dawid. 2015b. W poszukiwaniu trzeciej drogi – poza etatystycznym i rynkowym modelem usług publicznych. https://www.academia. edu/12658333/W_poszukiwaniu_trzeciej_drogi_poza_etatystycznym_i_rynkowym_modelem_us%C5%82ug_publicznych. Access 18.09.2018.
122. Sześciło, Dawid. 2015c. Samoobsługowe państwo dobrobytu. Czy obywatelska koprodukcja uratuje usługi publiczne? Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
123. Sześciło, Dawid. 2015d. Koprodukcja a ekonomia społeczna. Alternatywa rozłączna czy komplementarność? Ekonomia Społeczna, 1: 79–87. DOI: 10.15678/ES.2015.1.06.
124. Szukalski, Piotr. 2009. Przygotowanie do starości jako zadanie dla jednostek i zbiorowości. In: P. Szukalski, ed. Przygotowanie do starości. Polacy wobec starzenia się. Warszawa: Instytut Spraw Publicznych, 39–55.
125. The State of Ageing in 2019: Adding Life to Our Years, London: The Centre for Ageing Better. https://ageing-better.org.uk/resources/state-of-ageing-2019. Access 17.07.2022.
126. Theiss, Maria. 2012. Krewni – znajomi – obywatele. Kapitał społeczny a lokalna polityka społeczna. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
127. Thomsen, Mette K., Morten Jakobsen. 2015. Influencing Citizen Coproduction by Sending Encouragement and Advice: A Field Experiment. International Public Management Journal, 18: 286–303. DOI: 10.1080/10967494.2014.996628.
128. Timonen, Virpi. 2016. Beyond successful and active ageing: A theory of model ageing. Bristol: Policy Press. DOI: /10.2307/j.ctt1t88xh2. Access 17.07.2022.
129. Trutkowski, Cezary, Sławomir Mandes. 2005. Kapitał społeczny w małych miastach. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
130. United Nations. 2019a. World Population Prospects 2019, Volume I: Comprehensive Tables (ST/ESA/SER.A/426), New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. https://population.un.org/wpp/publications/Files/WPP2019_Volume-I_Comprehensive-Tables.pdf. Access 18.08.2021.
131. United Nations. 2019b. World Population Prospects 2019, Volume II: Demographic Profiles (ST/ESA/SER.A/427), New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. https://population.un.org/wpp/publications/Files/WPP2017_Volume-II-Demographic-Profiles.pdf. Access 18.08.2021.
132. UNECE. 2017. Realizing the potential of living longer, Policy Brief on Ageing No. 19. https://unece.org/DAM/pau/age/Policy_briefs/ECE-WG1-26.pdf. Dostęp 17.07.2022.
133. Wang, XiaoHu, Montgomery Van Wart. 2007. When public participation in administration leads to trust: An empirical assessment of managers’ perceptions. Public Administration Review, 67, 2: 265–278. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00712.x.
134. Whitaker, Gordon P. 1980. Co-production: citizen participation in service delivery. Public Administration Review, 40: 240–246. DOI: 10.2307/975377.
135. World Health Organization (WHO). 2002. Active ageing: A policy framework. Geneva: WHO.
136. Vanleene, Daphne, Bram Verschuere, Joris Voets. 2015. Benefits and risks of co-production a preliminary literature review. Paper for the IIAS Conference on co-production of public services, Nijmegen. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/55783288.pdf. Access 19.07.2022.
137. Verschuere, Bram, Taco Brandsen, Victor Pestoff. 2012. Co-production: The state of the art in research and the future agenda. International Journal of Voluntary and Non-Profit Organization, 23:1083–1101. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-012-9307-8.
138. Visaria, Abhijit, Premchand Dommaraju. 2019. Productive aging in India. Social Science and Medicine, 229: 14–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.029.
139. Zaidi, Asghar, Keneth Howse. 2017. The policy discourse of active ageing: some reflections. Journal of Population Ageing, 10: 1–10. DOI: 10.1007/s12062-017-9174-6.
140. Zdrojewski, Eugeniusz. 2009. Tworzenie zasobów kapitału ludzkiego w Polsce. Zeszyty Naukowe Wydziału Nauk Ekonomicznych Politechniki Koszalińskiej, 13: 51–65.
141. Zrałek, Maria. 2014a. Tworzenie warunków sprzyjających aktywności ludzi starszych. In:. Regionalny Ośrodek Polityki Społecznej Województwa Śląskiego, eds. Osoby starsze w przestrzeni życia społecznego. Katowice: OMIKRON Sp. z o.o, 32–45.
142. Zrałek, Maria. 2014b. Tworzenie podstaw dla partycypacji osób starszych w życiu społecznym. In: A. Kamińska, E. Kraus, K. Ślęczka, Sosnowiec, eds. Jak możliwy jest dialog? Kraków: Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Humanitas, 112–121.
143. Żuk, Krzysztof. 2007. Samorząd terytorialny w procesie świadczenia usług komunalnych. In: A. Miszczuk, M. Miszczuk, K. Żuk, eds. Gospodarka samorządu terytorialnego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 140–141.
144. Xu Zongyou, Wanjia Zhang, Xuewen Zhang, Yixi Wang, Qing Chen, Bo Gao, Ningxiu Li. 2022. Multi-Level Social Capital and Subjective Wellbeing Among the Elderly: Understanding the Effect of Family, Workplace, Community, and Society Social Capital. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.772601.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Grzegorz Gawron
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Uniwersytet Śląski

University autonomy; the core of academic culture

Piotr Sztompka
Nauka | 2017 | No 3 | 7-13
Keywords autonomy academic culture university social capital
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Academic culture is a set of rules (norms and values) regulating the institution of the university. The central component of academic culture is autonomy both in the sense of independence from external interference and the capacity to decide on research, teaching and organization of the university. Autonomy is endangered by the interference in academic culture of other cultural complexes characteristic for modern society: corporate culture, business culture, bureaucratic culture, financial culture, consumer culture. The resulting cultural clash is the reason for current crisis of the university. The defense of autonomy is the ethical and professional duty of scholars.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Piotr Sztompka

Współczesne przemiany czynników rozwoju społeczno-gospodarczego

Barbara Konecka-Szydłowska Paweł Churski Michał Dolata Joanna Dominiak Jan Hauke Tomasz Herodowicz Adam Nowak Robert Perdał Marcin Woźniak
Studia KPZK | 2018 | tom 183 Teoretyczne i aplikacyjne wyzwania współczesnej geografii społeczno-ekonomicznej
Keywords socio-economic development factor megatrends human capital social capital material capital financial capital innovations
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Contemporary changes of socio-economic development factors. The aim of the work is to determine the scope of contemporary changes of socio-economic development factors, paying attention to the consequences for their interpretation and mechanism of impact relating to the regional and local level. The main goal is specified by formulating the following research questions: (1) What major megatrends shape contemporary developmental transformations? (2) What is the direction and scope of changes in socio-economic development factors? (3) How are the conditions of development processes changing as a result of these changes and how they differentiate the processes of development in space? The article is a synthesis of the results of two research projects of the National Science Center: NN 306 79 19 40: Socio-economic development and the development of areas of growth and areas of economic stagnation (2011–2014) and OPUS 10 – 2015/19/B/HS5/00012: New challenges of regional policy in shaping the factors of socio-economic development of less developed regions (2016–2019) and the results of own authors’ research – employees of the Regional Analysis Department at the Institute of Socio-Economic Geography and Spatial Management of the Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Barbara Konecka-Szydłowska
Paweł Churski
Michał Dolata
Joanna Dominiak
Jan Hauke
Tomasz Herodowicz
Adam Nowak
Robert Perdał
Marcin Woźniak

The Role of Housing Resources in Formation of the Territorial Capital

Dorota Sikora-Fernandez
Studia KPZK | 2018 | tom 184 Rozwój lokalny i regionalny. Teorie i zastosowania | 265-274
Keywords Housing housing policy housing recourses territorial social capital
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Housing resources as an element of material infrastructure determine socio-economic development on a local, regional and national scale. Their economic and physical accessibility affects the development of human, social and relational capital, determines the competitiveness of the territory and can be seen as a generator of income both in the individual sense and in relation to the whole society. The article has a theoretical character and its aim is to identify the relationship between satisfying the housing needs of local communities and the development of territorial capital. The article also analyzes factors that allow the qualification of housing resources as a strategic resource for the development of a territory.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Dorota Sikora-Fernandez

Leaving for Germany under Au-pair program

Elżbieta Kaleciak
Studia Socjologiczne | 2010 | No 1 | 107-125
Keywords Au-pair program economic capital cultural capital social capital
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article presents one of contemporary forms of Polish migration to other countries enabling migrants to gain new skills and experiences, namely the migration of Polish women taking part in the Au-pair program. The analyzed data were gathered through in-depth interviews with former participants of the Au-pair program in germany – one of the main destinations of this kind of migration from Poland.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Elżbieta Kaleciak

The social role of the local press: The case of Gazeta Lipnicka

Joanna Wróblewska-Jachna Katarzyna Piątek
Rocznik Historii Prasy Polskiej | 2023 | t. 26 | No 2 | 65-83 | DOI: 10.24425/rhpp.2023.145588
Keywords Polish local press social capital integration media ecosystem
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to analyze the impact of local press on social capital. A content analysis of Gazeta Lipnicka, a newspaper published between 1997 and 2016 in Bielsko-Biała by the Lipnik Association, is used to examine its communicative and integrative role in the local community.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Joanna Wróblewska-Jachna
1
ORCID: ORCID
Katarzyna Piątek
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Katedra Nauk Ekonomicznych i Społecznych, Akademia Techniczno-Humanistyczna w Bielsku-Białej, ul. Willowa 2 PL 43-309 Bielsko-Biała

Precarious Work? Migrants’ Narratives of Coping with Working Conditions in the Danish Labour Market

Doris Pljevaljcic Simkunas Trine Lund Thomsen
Central and Eastern European Migration Review | 2018 | Vol. 7 | No 2 | 35-51
Keywords biographical narratives cultural and social capital labour security migrant workers precarious working conditions
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article deals with migrants’ experiences of precarious working conditions in the cleaning and con-struction industries in the Danish labour market as seen from their perspective. The experiences are retained through biographical narrative interviews with migrant workers from Central and Eastern Europe and are used to gain an understanding of the concrete strategies they apply when coping with their short-term contracts, demanding working hours, risk of unemployment and other insecurities. Mi-grants’ experiences of precarity and insecurity in their work is confirmed, to some degree, in numerous research studies. However, the resistance and strategies expressed by the migrant workers in their nar-ratives show that they have also developed specific ways to cope with this precarity. The article con-tributes to a new understanding of migrants’ responses to precarity in which they engage their social and cultural resources to cope with the labour market conditions they face in Denmark.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Doris Pljevaljcic Simkunas
Trine Lund Thomsen

(Missing) Bridging Ties and Social Capital? The Creation and Reproduction of Migrants’ Social Network Advantages: The Case of Ukrainian Migrants in Poland

Marta Kindler Katarzyna Wójcikowska-Baniak
Central and Eastern European Migration Review | 2019 | vol. 8 | No 1 | 95-116
Keywords social networks bridging ties social capital Ukrainian migrants Poland institutional embedding
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper investigates the mechanisms behind the formation and maintenance of those migrants’ social ties which translate into a particular composition of the network and become a source of social capital. Based on a number of in-depth interviews with Ukrainian migrants in Warsaw, we find that Ukrainian migrants’ networks are based primarily on ties homogenous in regard to nationality, level of education and character of work. The institutional context of social interaction determines with whom migrants form relations and whether these ties become a source of social advancement. The studied migrants do form bridging ties with more experienced, as well as socially and legally embedded persons, mainly other migrants, receiving both instrumental and emotional support.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marta Kindler
Katarzyna Wójcikowska-Baniak

Urban Dwellers in the Social Field: Models of Participation in Culture, Social Networks, and the Class Structure

Michał Cebula
Kultura i Społeczeństwo | 2019 | No 3 | 109-140
Keywords urban studies lifestyles consumption social field social classes social capital social networks
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

One of the key issues in contemporary urban studies is to consider the city from the perspective of culture and consumption, which are treated as new drivers of urban development and economic prosperity, the essence of urban ways of life, and arenas for the implementation of urban policies. In a consumer society, cities become important nodes where collective and individual consumption takes place on a massive scale. The urban system organizes capabilities and provides the resources for consumption, thus facilitating various kinds of lifestyles. As a result, the urban space operates as an arena of competition, where different consumer orientations and social categories strive physically and symbolically to occupy ground, produce meanings, and create belonging in the spaces and places that constitute the city. In applying Pierre Bourdieu’s concept of a “social field,” the aim of the article is to show how the space of social positions corresponds to the space of cultural practices. Drawing on the study of cultural and leisure activities in Wrocław, four general categories of urban residents are revealed and characterized by their distinct positions in different dimensions of the social space. The analysis also points to social capital (social networks) as an efficient new principle of cultural differentiation. The paper closes with the author’s concluding remarks and guidelines for further research.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Michał Cebula
ORCID: ORCID

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more