How to search?
advanced search

Search results

Filters

  • Journals
  • Keywords
  • Date

Search results

Number of results: 15
items per page: 25 50 75
Sort by:

Kobieca solidarność międzypokoleniowa oczyma trzech generacji kobiet

Aldona Żurek
Studia Socjologiczne | 2022 | No 1 | 61-79 | DOI: 10.24425/sts.2022.140596
Keywords rodzina pokolenia solidarność rodzinna solidarność kobiet
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Celem artykułu była prezentacja zjawiska solidarności kobiet ujętych w kontekst Strajku Kobiet. Solidarność kobieca przedstawiona została w odniesieniu do dwóch kategorii kobiet. Pierwszej reprezentowanej przez kobiety znajdujące się w fazie ontogenetycznej, w której możliwa jest prokreacja. Druga dotyczyła tych kobiet, które nie mogą już urodzić dziecka. Analizując zebrane dane empiryczne autorce chodziło o uzyskanie odpowiedzi na pytanie o to, jaki charakter ma solidarność kobieca, zwłaszcza ta, która łączy pokolenia. Zjawisko solidarności kobiet zaprezentowane zostało w dwóch perspektywach: manifestującym się w codziennym życiu rodzin, a także mającym miejsce ze względu na wyjątkową sytuację społeczną, jaką był Strajk Kobiet.
Go to article

Bibliography

1. Allan, Graham. 2008. Flexibility, friendship, and family. Personal Relationship,15, 1: 1– 6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2007.00181.x.
2. Arnett, Jeffrey Jensen. 2000. Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 5: 469–480. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066X.55.5.469.
3. Beck, Ulrich, Elizabeth Beck-Gernsheim. 2002. Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences. London: Sage.
4. Bengtson, Vern L., Robert E. L. Roberts 1991. Intergenerational Solidarity in Aging Families: An Example of Formal Theory Construction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 4: 856–870. http://www.jstor.org/stable/352993. Dostęp 28.09.2021.
5. Bojczyk, Kathryn, Tara J. Lehan, Lenore M. McWey, Gail F. Melson, Debra Renee Kaufman. 2011. Mothers’and Their Adult Daughters’Perceptions of Their Relationship. Journal of Family Issues, 32: 452–481. DOI: 10.1177/0192513X10384073.
6. CBOS. 2020. O dopuszczalności przerywania ciąży po wyroku Trybunału Konstytucyjnego. Komunikat z badań nr 153/2020. www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2020/K_153_20.PDF. Dostęp 25.10.2020.
7. Charles, Marilyn, Susan Frank, Stacy Jacobson, Gail Grossman. 2001. Repetition of the remembered past: Patterns of separation-individuation in two generations of mothers and daughters. Psychoanalytic Psychology,18, 4: 705–728. DOI: 10.1037//0736-9735.18.4.705.
8. Clarke, Edward, Michelle Preston, J. Raksin, Vern Bengtson. 1999. Types of Conflicts and Tensions Between Older Parents and Adult Children. The Gerontologist, 39, 3: 261–70. DOI: 10.1093/geront/39.3.261.
9. Conlon, Catherine, Virpi Timonen, Gemma Carney, Thomas Scharf. 2014. Women (Re) Negotiating Care across Family Generations: Intersections of Gender and Socioeconomic Status. Gender & Society, 28, 5: 729–751. DOI:10.1177/0891243214536466.
10. Crow, Graham. 2002. Social Solidarities: Theories, Identities and Social Change. Buckingham: Open University.
11. DeRigne, Lea Anne, Stephen Ferrante. 2012. The Sandwich Generation: A Review of the Literature. Florida Public Health Review, 9: 95–104. https://digitalcommons. unf.edu/ fphr/ vol9/iss1/12. Dostęp 28.09.2021.
12. Duncan, Simon. 2011. Personal Life, Pragmatism and Bricolage. Sociological Research Online, 16, 4: 129–140. DOI:10.5153/sro.2537.
13. Dykstra, Pearl, Teresa Cooney. 2011. Family obligations and support behaviour: A United States-Netherlands comparison. Ageing and Society, 31, 6: 1026–1050. DOI: 10.1017/S0144686 X10001339.
14. Fingerman, Karen. L., Eric Bermann. 2000. Applications of family systems theory to the study of adulthood. The International Journal of Aging & Human Development. 51, 1: 5–29. DOI: 10.2190/7TF8-WB3F-TMWG-TT3K.
15. Fingerman, Karen, Laura Miller, Kira Birditt, Steven Zarit. 2009. Giving to the Good and the Needy: Parental Support of Grown Children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 5: 1220–1233. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00665.
16. Furstenberg, Frank. 2018. American Kinship Reconsidered. University of Pennsylvania Population Center Working Paper (PSC/PARC), 2018-19. https://repository.upenn.edu/psc_publications/19. Dostęp 4.08.2021.
17. Gamboni, Casey M., Elizabeth R. Watters, Kayla Reed-Fitzke. 2021. Gender, Religious, and Political Ideologies Among Three‐Generation Families: Implications for Family Conflict. Family Relations, 70, 5: 1529–1545. DOI: 10.1111/fare.12559.
18. Grundy, Emily M., John C. Henretta. 2006. Between elderly parents and adult children a new look at the intergenerational care provided by the ’sandwich generation’. Ageing and Society, 26: 707–722. DOI: 10.1017/s0144686x06004934.
19. Killian, Thimothy, Lawrence H. Ganong. 2002. Ideology, Context, and Obligations to Assist Older Persons. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 4: 1080–1088. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.01080.x.
20. Liefbroer Aart. C., Clara.H Mulder. 2006. Family obligations. In: P.A. Dykstra, M. Kalmijn, T.C.M. Knijn, A.E. Komter, A.C. Liefbroer, C.H. Mulder, eds. Family Solidarity in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Dutch University Press, 123–142. http://hdl.handle.net/1765/18191.
21. Lorca, Maria B., Ponce Maria. S. 2015. Normative, Structural, and Individual Factors that Predispose Adult Children to Provide Social Support to Their Elderly Parents. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 46, 46: 517–540. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24573603. Dostęp 12.08.2021.
22. Lynch, Jane. 2006. Age in the Welfare State: The Origins of Social Spending on Pensioners, Workers, and Children (Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. McKie, Linda, Susan Gregory, Sophia Bowlby. 2002. Shadow Times: The Temporal and Spatial Frameworks and Experiences of Caring and Working. Sociology, 36, 4: 897–924. DOI: 10.1177/003803850203600406.
24. O’Brien, Robert, Anne Marie Goetz, Jan Aart Scholte, Marc Williams. 2009. Contesting global governance: Multilateral economic institutions and global social movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Sanner, Caroline, Lawrence Ganong, Marilyn Coleman, Ashton Chapman, Youngjin Kang. 2019. Building Family Relationships With Inherited Stepgrandparents. Family Relations, 68, 4: 484–499. DOI: 10.1111/fare.12381.
26. Shapiro, Adam. 2004. Revisiting the Generation Gap: Exploring the Relationships of Parent/Adult-Child Dyads. Research on Social Work Practice, 58, 2: 302–310. DOI: 10.1177/104973159900900303.
27. Silverstein, Merril, Vern L. Bengtson. 1997. Intergenerational solidarity and the structure of adult child – Parent relationships in American families. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 2: 429–460. DOI: 10.1086/23121.
28. Smart, Carol. 2007. Same Sex Couples and Marriage: Negotiating Relational Landscapes with Families and Friends. The Sociological Review, 55, 4: 671–686. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00747.x.
29. Subašić, Emina, Stephane Hardacre, Benjamin Elton, Nyla R. Branscombe, Michelle K. Ryan, Katherine J. Reynolds. 2018. “We for She”: Mobilising men and women to act in solidarity for gender equality. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21, 5: 707–724. DOI: 10.1177/1368430218763272.
30. Suh, Mee. 2008. Women, Ageing and the Family in Korea. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 13: 175 – 177. DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-6612.1994.tb00667.x.
31. Suitor, J. Jill, Karl Pillemer. 2000. When experience counts most: Effects of experiential similarity on men’s and women’s receipt of support during bereavement. Social Networks, 22, 4: 299–312. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-8733(00)00028-9.
32. Suitor, J. Jill, Karl Pillemer. 2006. Choosing Daughters: Exploring Why Mothers Favor Adult Daughters over Sons. Sociological Perspectives, 49, 2: 139–161. DOI: 10.1525/sop.2006.49.2.139.
33. Suitor, J. Jill, Karl Pillemer, Jori Sechrist. 2006. Within-Family Differences in Mothers’ Support to Adult Children. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61, 1: 10–17. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/61.1.S10.
34. Szukalski, Piotr.2012. Solidarność pokoleń. Dylematy relacji międzypokoleniowych. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
35. Szukalski Piotr. 2002. Proces starzenia się ludności a sprawiedliwość i równość międzypokoleniowa. W: P. Kowaleski, P. Szukalski, red. Proces starzenia się ludności – potrzeby i wyzwania. Łódź: Wyd. Biblioteka, 9 – 19.
36. Šlechtová, Hana. 2021. Siblinghood-in-Law as a Dimension of Siblinghood from the Perspective of Later Life. Studia Socjologiczne, 240, 1: 139–161. DOI: 10.24425/sts.2021.136453.
37. Walker, Alan. 1996. Intergenerational relations and the provisions of welfare. In: A. Walker, ed. The new generational contract, Intergenerational relations, old age and welfare. London: University College London, 10–37.
38. Wall, Karin, Rita Gouveia, Aeby Gaelle, Vida Cesnuityte. 2018, Changing Meanings of Family in Personal Relationships. In: K. Wall., E.D. Widmer, J. Gauthier, V. Česnuityte, R. Gouveia, eds. Families and Personal Networks. An International Comparative Perspective. UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 99–130.
39. Webber, Gretchen, Patti Giuffre. 2019. Women’s relationships with women at work: Barriers to solidarity. Sociology Compass, 13, 6: 1–10. DOI: 10.1111/soc4.12698.
40. Wheelock, Jane, Elizabeth Oughton, Susan Baines. 2003. Getting By with a Little Help from Your Family: Toward a Policy-Relevant Model of the Household. Feminist Economics, 1, 9: 19–45. DOI: 10.1080/1354570032000057053.
41. Wiley, Shaun, Ruhi Srinivasan, Elizabeth Finke, Joseph Firnhaber, Alyssa Shilinsky. 2013. Positive Portrayals of Feminist Men Increase Men’s Solidarity With Feminists and Collective Action Intentions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37: 61–71. DOI: 10.1177/0361684312464575.
42. Woźniak, Zbigniew. 2012. Solidarność międzypokoleniowa w starzejącym się świecie – perspektywy i zagrożenia. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, LXXIV, 3: 21–63. DOI: 10.14746/rpeis.2012.74.3.2.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Aldona Żurek
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

Zmiana postrzegania i doświadczania solidarności w pandemii COVID-19

Jowita Radzińska
Studia Socjologiczne | 2022 | No 3 | 111-136 | DOI: 10.24425/sts.2022.142636
Keywords relacje solidarność pandemia socjologia moralności COVID-19
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

W konsekwencji pandemii COVID-19 pojawiły się nowe potrzeby i ujawniły dawne deficyty, a solidarność okazała się potrzebna w obszarach do tej pory niewymagających wsparcia, co zmobilizowało wiele osób do wspólnotowych postaw i aktywności. W artykule przedstawiono, jak postrzeganie i doświadczanie solidarności zmieniało się w czasie pandemii w podziale na sześć obszarów wyłonionych z materiału empirycznego: relacje i kontakt; wsparcie w sieciach społecznych i ze względu na bliskość; charytatywność; postawy obywatelskie; duchowość i ekologia. Wyniki pochodzą z jakościowego badania podłużnego, prowadzonego od marca 2020 do czerwca 2021 roku, w którym brało udział 25 osób. Kluczowe wnioski dotyczą zmiany postrzegania i doświadczania solidarności wraz z upływem czasu i wyczerpywaniem zasobów. W artykule postawiono pytania o budowanie trwałych postaw i praktyk solidarnościowych.
Go to article

Bibliography

1. Arendt, Hannah. 1991. O rewolucji. Przekład Mieczysław Godyń. Kraków: Dom Wydawniczy Totus.
2. Arora, Gulhima, George Kroumpouzos, Martin Kassir, Mohammad Jafferany, Torello Lotti, Roxanna Sadoughifar, Zuzanna Sitkowska, Stephan Grabbe, Mohammad Goldustcorresponding. 2020. Solidarity and transparency against the COVID‐19 pandemic. Dermatologic Therapy. doi: 10.1111/dth.13359.
3. Arpino, Bruno, Marta Pasqualini, Valeria Bordone, Aïda Solé-Auró. 2020. Indirect consequences of COVID-19 on people’s lives. Findings from an on-line survey in France, Italy and Spain. SocArX. doi: 10.31235/osf.io/4sfv9.
4. Ayalon, Liat, Alison Chasteen, Manfred Diehl, Becca R. Levy, Shevaun D. Neupert, Klaus Rothermund, Clemens Tesch-Römer, Hans-Werner Wahl. 2021. Aging in times of the COVID-19 pandemic: Avoiding ageism and fostering intergenerational solidarity. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 76, 2: e49‒e52. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/ gbaa051.
5. Bartkowski, Jerzy. 2014. Solidarność społeczna i kryzys. Zmiany wartości w Europie i w Polsce w warunkach kryzysu. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Sociologica, 48: 19‒34.
6. Bayertz, Kurt. 1999. Four Uses of “Solidarity”. In: K. Bayertz, ed. Solidarity. Dordrecht: Springer, 209‒220.
7. Beck, Ulrich. 2004. Społeczeństwo ryzyka: w drodze do innej nowoczesności. Przekład Bogdan Baran. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
8. Bernard, Anna. 2017. Cultural activism as resource: Pedagogies of resistance and solidarity. Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 53, 3: 367‒379.
9. Bertogg, Ariane, Sebastian Koos. 2021. Socio-economic position and local solidarity in times of crisis. The COVID-19 pandemic and the emergence of informal helping arrangements in Germany. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 74: 100612. DOI: 10.1016/j.rssm.2021.100612.
10. Bowleg, Lisa. 2020. We’re not all in this together: on COVID-19, intersectionality, and structural inequality. American Journal of Public Health, 110, 7: 917‒917. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305766.
11. Carlsen, Hjalmar Bang, Jonas Toubøl, Benedikte Brincker. 2021. On solidarity and volunteering during the COVID-19 crisis in Denmark: the impact of social networks and social media groups on the distribution of support. European Societies, 23 (sup1): S122‒S140. DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2020.1818270.
12. Cheng, Kar Keung, Tai Hing Lam, Chi Chiu Leung. 2022. Wearing face masks in the community during the COVID-19 pandemic: altruism and solidarity. The Lancet, 399.10336: E39-E40. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30918-1.
13. Chwat, Oliwia. 2021. Social Solidarity during the Pandemic: The “Visible Hand” and Networked Social Movements. Kultura i Społeczeństwo, 65, 1: 87‒104. DOI: 10.35757/KiS.2021.65.1.3.
14. Cluver, Lucie, Jamie M. Lachman, Lorraine Sherr, Inge Wessels, Etienne Krug, Sabine Rakotomalala, Stephen Blight, Susan Hillis, Gretchen Bachman, Ohad Green, Alex Butchart, Mark Tomlinson, Catherine L. Ward, Jennifer Doubt, Kerida McDonald. 2020. Parenting in a time of COVID-19. Lancet, 395: 10231, e64. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30736-4.
15. Comte-Sponville, André. 2000. Mały traktat o wielkich cnotach. Przekład Halina Lubicz-Trawkowska. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza Volumen.
16. Constantinou, Costas S. 2021. „People Have to Comply with the Measures”: Covid-19 in “Risk Society.” Journal of Applied Social Science, 15, 1: 3‒11. DOI: 10.1177/1936724420980374.
17. Córdobaa, Diana, Ana M. Peredob, Paola Chavesc. 2021. Shaping alternatives to development: Solidarity and reciprocity in the Andes during COVID-19. World Development, 139: 105323. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105323.
18. Crow, Graham. 2002. Social Solidarities: Theories, Identities and Social Change. Buckingham: Open University Press.
19. Czapliński, Przemysław. 2015. Zbyt późna nowoczesność. W: J. Żakowski, red. Reforma kulturowa, dostępny: https://nck.pl/badania/raporty/reforma-kulturowa-2020--2030--2040. Dostęp 06.10.2021.
20. De Cremer, David, Geoffrey J. Leonardelli. 2003. Cooperation in social dilemmas and the need to belong: The moderating effect of group size. Group dynamics: Theory, research, and practice, 7, 2: 168.
21. Del Boca, Daniela, Noemi Oggero, Paola Profeta, Mariacristina Rossi. 2020. Women’s and men’s work, housework and childcare, before and during COVID-19. Review of Economics of the Household, 18, 4: 1001‒1017. DOI: 10.1007/s11150-02009502-1.
22. Drozdowski, Rafał, Maciej Frąckowiak, Marek Krajewski, Małgorzata Kubacka, Piotr Luczys, Ariel Modrzyk, Łukasz Rogowski, Przemysław Rura, Agnieszka Stamm. 2020. Życie codzienne w czasach pandemii. Raport z drugiego etapu badań. https://issuu.com/wydzialsocjologiiuam/docs/z_ycie_codzienne_w_czasach_pandemii._raport_z_drug. Dostęp 29.11.2020.
23. Duque, Franco, Isabel, Catalina Ortiz, Jota Samper, Gynna Millan. 2020. Mapping repertoires of collective action facing the COVID-19 pandemic in informal settlements in Latin American cities. Environment and Urbanization, 32, 2: 523‒546. DOI: 10.1177/0956247820944823.
24. Ellerich-Groppe, Niklas, Mark Schweda, Larissa Pfaller. 2020. #StayHomeForGrandma–Towards an analysis of intergenerational solidarity and responsibility in the coronavirus pandemic. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2, 1: 100085. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100085.
25. Fancourt, Daisy, Andrew Steptoe, Feifei Bu. 2021. Trajectories of anxiety and depres- sive symptoms during enforced isolation due to COVID-19 in England: a longitudinal observational study. The Lancet Psychiatry, 8, 2: 141‒149. DOI: 10.1016/ S2215-0366(20)30482-X.
26. Furceri, Davide, Prakash Loungani, Jonathan D. Ostry, Pietro Pizzuto. 2020. Will Covid-19 affect inequality? Evidence from past pandemics. Covid Economics, 12, 1: 138‒157.
27. Goodhart, Darlene E. 1985. Some psychological effects associated with positive and negative thinking about stressful event outcomes: Was Pollyanna right?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1: 216.
28. Goodwin, Robin, Wai Kai Hou, Shaojing Sun, Menachem Ben-Ezra. 2020. Quarantine, distress and interpersonal relationships during COVID-19. General psychiatry, 33, 6. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2020-100385.
29. Granovetter, Mark. 1973. The Strength of Weak Ties, American Journal of Sociology, 78, 6: 1360‒1380.
30. Hanel, Paul HP, Lukas J. Wolf. 2020. Leavers and Remainers after the Brexit referendum: More united than divided after all?. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59, 2: 470‒493. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12359.
31. Hansson, Pia, Audur Birna Stefansdottir. 2021. Nordic solidarity and COVID-19. Small States & Territories, 4, 1: 29‒44. https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/74990.
32. Hardoš, Pavol, Zuzana Madarová. 2021. On the Forms of Vulnerability and Ungrievability in the Pandemic. Mezinárodní vztahy, 56, 4: 119‒130. DOI: 10.32422/mv-cjir.1819.
33. Herer, Michał. 2017. Pochwała przyjaźni, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
34. Jetten, Jolanda. 2020. Together apart: The psychology of COVID-19. Sage.
35. Kiciński, Krzysztof. 1983. Posłowie. W: M. Ossowska. O człowieku, moralności i nauce. Miscellanea. Warszawa: PWN.
36. Kilkey, Majella, Louise Ryan. 2021. Unsettling events: understanding migrants’ responses to geopolitical transformative episodes through a life-course lens. International Migration Review, 55, 1: 227‒253. DOI: 10.1177/0197918320905507.
37. Kneuer, Marianne, Michael Corsten, Hannes Schammann, Patrick Kahle, Stefan Wallaschek, Franziska Ziegler. 2021. Claiming solidarity: A multilevel discursive reconstruction of solidarity. European Journal of Social Theory. DOI: 10.1177/13684310211045794.
38. Knize, Veronika, Lina Tobler, Bernhard Christoph, Lukas Fervers, Marita Jacob. 2021. Workin’ moms ain’t doing so bad: Evidence on the gender gap in working hours at the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Family Research, 34, 1: 161‒192. DOI: 10.20377/jfr-714.
39. Kołakowski, Leszek. 2012. O solidarności z małej litery pisanej. W: L. Balcerowicz, red. Odkrywając wolność. Przeciw zniewoleniu umysłów. Poznań: Zysk i S-ka Wydawnictwo.
40. Lachance, Erik L. 2020. COVID-19 and its impact on volunteering: moving towards virtual volunteering. Leisure Sciences, 43, 1-2: 104‒110. DOI: 10.1080/01490400.2020.1773990.
41. Leal Filho, Walter, Luciana Londero Brandli, Amanda Lange Salvia, Lez Rayman-Bacchus, Johannes Platje. 2020. COVID-19 and the UN Sustainable Development Goals: Threat to Solidarity or an Opportunity? Sustainability, 12, 13: 5343. DOI: 10.3390/su12135343.
42. Marody, Mirosława. 2014. Jednostka po nowoczesności. Perspektywa socjologiczna. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
43. Maio, Gregory R., James M. Olson, Mark M. Bernard, Michelle A. Luke. 2006. Ideologies, values, attitudes, and behavior. In: R. T. Serpe, ed. Handbook of social psychology. Boston: Springer, MA, 283‒308.
44. Marston, Cicely, Alicia Renedo, Sam Miles. 2020. Community participation is crucial in a pandemic. The Lancet, 395, 10238: 1676‒1678. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31054-0.
45. Mishra, Chinmayee, Navaneeta Rath. 2020. Social solidarity during a pandemic: Through and beyond Durkheimian Lens. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2, 1: 100079. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100079.
46. Modrzyk, Ariel. 2020. Normy średniego zasięgu i kwestia normatywnej integracji społecznej. Studia Socjologiczne, 237, 2: 39‒62. DOI: 10.24425/sts.2020.132461.
47. Morgan, David H. 1996. Family connections: An introduction to family studies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
48. Neale, Bren. 2019. What is qualitative longitudinal research? Oxford: Bloomsbury Publishing.
49. Nogal, Agnieszka. 2013. Solidarność jako wartość polityczna. Civitas. Studia z filozofii polityki, 15: 99‒116. DOI: 10.35757/CIV.2013.15.05.
50. Nolan, Ryan. 2021. ‘We are all in this together!’Covid-19 and The Lie of Solidarity. Irish Journal of Sociology, 29, 1: 102‒106. DOI: 10.1177/0791603520940967.
51. Nowak, Stefan. 1979. System wartości społeczeństwa polskiego. Studia Socjologiczne, 4: 155–173.
52. Ossowska, Maria. 1983. Etyka, świat i życie. W: M. Ossowska. O człowieku, moralności i nauce. Miscellanea. Warszawa: PWN.
53. Ossowska, Maria. 1967. Szkic autobiograficzny, Polska, nr 1. W: M. Ossowska. O człowieku, moralności i nauce. Miscellanea. Warszawa: PWN.
54. Ossowska, Maria. 2000. Normy moralne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
55. Ossowska, Maria. 2005. Socjologia moralności. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
56. Pawlik, Wojciech, red. 2016. Empatia i moralność a życie społeczne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
57. Perry, Brea L., Brian Aronson, Bernice A. Pescosolido. 2021. Pandemic precarity: COVID-19 is exposing and exacerbating inequalities in the American heartland. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118, 8: e2020685118. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2020685118.
58. Pfattheicher, Stefan, Laila Nockur, Robert Böhm, Claudia Sassenrath, Michael Bang Petersen. 2020. The emotional path to action: Empathy promotes physical distancing and wearing of face masks during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychological science, 31, 11: 1363‒1373. DOI: 10.1177/0956797620964422.
59. Pieh, Christoph, Teresa O´Rourke, Sanja Budimir, Thomas Probst. 2021. Correction: Relationship quality and mental health during COVID-19 lockdown. Plos one, 16, 9: e0257118. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257118.
60. Putnam, Robert D. 2008. Samotna gra w kręgle. Upadek i odrodzenie wspólnot lokalnych w Stanach Zjednoczonych. Przekład Przemysław Sadura i Sebastian Szymański. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne.
61. Radzińska, Jowita. 2014. Solidarność: definicja i konteksty. Etyka, 48: 58–68. DOI: 10.14394/etyka.470.
62. Radzińska, Jowita, Paula Pustułka. 2021. A Win for the Middle Class? A Qualitative Study Mapping “Benefits” from the National Quarantine. Kultura i Społeczeństwo, 65, 1: 43‒63. DOI: 10.35757/KiS.2021.65.1.1.
63. Riesman, David, Nathan Glazer, Reuel Denney. 1996. Samotny tłum. Przekład Jan Strzelecki. Warszawa: Warszawskie Wydawnictwo Literackie “Muza”.
64. Saldaña, Johnny. 2014. Coding and analysis strategies. The Oxford handbook of qualitative research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65. Sanderson, Rebecca, Mike Prentice, Lukas Wolf, Netta Weinstein, Tim Kasser, Tom Crompton. 2019. Strangers in a strange land: Relations between perceptions of others’ values and both civic engagement and cultural estrangement. Frontiers in psychology, 10: 559. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00559.
66. Sangiovanni, Andrea. 2015. Solidarity as joint action. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 32.4: 340–359. DOI: 10.1111/japp.12130.
67. Schwiertz, Helge, Helen Schwenken. 2020. Introduction: inclusive solidarity and citizenship along migratory routes in Europe and the Americas, Citizenship Studies, 24, 4: 405‒423. DOI: 10.1080/13621025.2020.1755155.
68. Settersten Jr, Richard A., Laura Bernardi, Juho Härkönen, Toni C. Antonucci, Pearl A. Dykstra, Jutta Heckhausen, Diana Kuh, Ulrich Karl Mayer, Phyllis Moen, Jeylan T. Mortimer, Clara H. Mulder, Timothy M. Smeeding, Tanja van der Lippe, Gunhild O. Hagestad, Martin Kohli, Rene Levy, Ingrid Schoon, Elizabeth Thomson. 2020. Understanding the effects of Covid-19 through a life course lens. Advances in Life Course Research, 45: 100360. DOI: 10.1016/j.alcr.2020.100360.
69. Stok, Marijn F., Michèlle Bal, Mara A. Yerkes, John B. F. de Wit. 2021. Social Inequality and Solidarity in Times of COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 12: 6339. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18126339.
70. Sztompka, Piotr. 1997. Kulturowe imponderabilia szybkich zmian społecznych. Zaufanie, lojalność, solidarność. Studia Socjologiczne, 4, 147: 5‒20.
71. Vandenberghe, Frédéric, Jean-François Véran. 2021. The Pandemic as a Global Social Total Fact. In: G. Delanty, eds. Pandemics, Politics, and Society: Critical Perspectives on the Covid-19 Crisis. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 171‒188. DOI: 10.1515/9783110713350-012.
72. Voicu, Bogdan, Edurne Bartolome Peral, Horatiu Rusu, Gergely Rosta, Mircea Comşa, Octavian-Marian Vasile, Lluis Coromina, Claudiu Tufis. 2021. COVID-19 and orientations towards solidarity: the cases of Spain, Hungary, and Romania. European Societies, 23 (sup1): S887‒S904. DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2020.1852439.
73. Tomasini, Floris. 2021. Solidarity in the Time of COVID-19?. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 30, 2: 234–247. DOI: 10.1017/S0963180120000791.
74. West-Oram, Peter. 2021. Solidarity is for other people: identifying derelictions of solidarity in responses to COVID-19. Journal of Medical Ethics, 47, 2: 65‒68. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106522.
75. WHO Solidarity Trial Consortium. 2021. Repurposed antiviral drugs for COVID-19— interim WHO SOLIDARITY trial results. New England Journal of medicine, 384, 6: 497‒511. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2023184.
76. Wildt, Andreas. 1999. Solidarity: its history and contemporary definition. In: K. Bayertz, ed. Solidarity. Dordrecht: Springer, 209‒220.
77. Wilson, John, Mark Musick. 1997. Who cares? Toward an integrated theory of volunteer work. American Sociological Review, 62, 5: 694–713. DOI: 10.2307/2657355.
78. Wolf, Lukas J., Geoffrey Haddock, Antony S. Manstead, Gregory R. Maio. 2020. The importance of (shared) human values for containing the COVID‐19 pandemic. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59, 3: 618‒627. DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12401.
79. Wróblewski, Michał, Andrzej Meler, Łukasz Afeltowicz. 2020. Ryzyko, zaufanie, choroby zakaźne. Polki i Polacy o pandemii. https://repozytorium.umk.pl/bitstream/handle/item/6434/UMK_pandemia.pdf?sequence=3. Dostęp 07.10.2021.


Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jowita Radzińska
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. SWPS Uniwersytet Humanistycznospołeczny

Reading the History of Women in "Solidarity" Movement. A Cultural Studies Approach

Magdalena Barbaruk
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2007-2008 | vol. 37-38 | 105-128
Keywords cultural history cultural studies "Solidarity" movement feminist historiography
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The Author analyses some methodological solutions adopted in her studies on historical presentation of women in the "Solidarity" underground movement.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Magdalena Barbaruk

Dylematy towarzyszące realizacji zasad solidarności rodzinnej. Na podstawie relacji między pokoleniami w rodzinie

Anna Kotlarska-Michalska
Studia Socjologiczne | 2017 | No 2
Keywords solidarność rodzinna; solidarność międzypokoleniowa; zasady solidarności rodzinnej; dylematy w realizacji zobowiązań; opieka nad osobami starszymi w rodzinie; sandwich generation; relacje międzypokoleniowe
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Authors and Affiliations

Anna Kotlarska-Michalska

Non-financial support for the old generation in Polish families

Anna Nicińska
Ekonomista | 2020 | No 1 | 47-74
Keywords personal care for the old private transfers intergenerational solidarity SHARE survey
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Present study examines nonfinancial support granted for older people in Poland and other European countries in order to understand the relationships between family structures and that support and to diagnose the challenges that the Polish population may face in this respect in the nearest future. The analysis is based on the data from the Survey on Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). The study attempts also to answer the question about the need for informal support in future generations of older Poles. The study is focused on the population of individuals aged at least 50+, because they will decide about the situation of older people in the near future. The author considers, in addition to personal care, help in running a household and help with paper work. The most frequently received type of support is the help in running a household, received primarily from neighbors and family members, which reduces the need for institutional care. Personal care is provided to the minority of the examined population, even in the highest age group, and, apart from household members, it concerns usually biological children.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Anna Nicińska

Rodzeństwo w dobie denormalizacji zobowiązań rodzinnych: wsparcie, zaufanie i konflikt

Iwona Przybył
Studia Socjologiczne | 2017 | No 2
Keywords miłość między rodzeństwem; siostrzeństwo; braterstwo; solidarność wewnątrzrodzinna; zaufanie
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Authors and Affiliations

Iwona Przybył

Międzygeneracyjny kontekst wychowania seksualnego w rodzinie z perspektywy młodego pokolenia, czyli kłopotliwe rozmowy rodziców i dzieci na temat intymności

Mariola Bieńko
Studia Socjologiczne | 2017 | No 2
Keywords solidarność rodzinna; rodzicielska edukacja seksualna dorastającej młodzieży; wywiady fokusowe
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Authors and Affiliations

Mariola Bieńko

Rodzina na wiele wariantów, ale czy z mniejszym zakresem solidarności?

Anna Kwak
Studia Socjologiczne | 2017 | No 2
Keywords solidarność międzypokoleniowa; wymiary solidarności rodzinnej; formy rodziny; kohabitacja; poczucie zobowiązań rodzinnych
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Authors and Affiliations

Anna Kwak

Polityka rodzinna dopełnieniem solidarności rodzinnej

Małgorzata Szyszka
Studia Socjologiczne | 2017 | No 2
Keywords polityka rodzinna; solidarność rodzinna; familizacja–defamilizacja opieki; genderyzacja–degenderyzacja opieki; Leitner; Saxonberg
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Authors and Affiliations

Małgorzata Szyszka

Polityka rodzinna dopełnieniem solidarności rodzinnej

Małgorzata Szyszka
Studia Socjologiczne | 2017 | No 3
Keywords polityka rodzinna; solidarność rodzinna; familizacja–defamilizacjaopieki; genderyzacja–degenderyzacja opieki; Leitner; Saxonberg
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Authors and Affiliations

Małgorzata Szyszka

What is conscience?

Łukasz Kowalik
Przegląd Filozoficzny. Nowa Seria | 2019 | No 1 | 69-91 | DOI: 10.24425/pfns.2019.126635
Keywords conscience awareness pathos ethos community solidarity tragedy Antigone Orestes J. Conrad B. Wolniewicz
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The concept of conscience is analyzed here in two different ways: the systematic and the historical-literary. As to the first, systematic perspective, I distinguish (in part 1) three levels of conscience and on every level I identify two opposite categories (conscience that is ‛individual’ versus ‛collective’; ‛emotional’ versus ‛intellectual’; ‛motivating ex ante’ versus ‛evaluating ex post’). In the second, historical-literary perspective, I analyze two literary cases of fictional characters usually thought of as being guided or affected by conscience. The first case is the ancient Greek tragedy and here I offer (in part 2) a comment on the Sophoclean Antigone and the Euripidean Orestes presenting them both as dramas that contain an exemplary formulation of the phenomenon of conscience. Although Antigone and Orestes express their main principles of action in apparently different words, I suggest (in part 3) the two poetical visions of conscience are equally based upon a highly emotional behavior called pathos by the Greek. Thereby I provide a reason, why ancient philosophers created a new concept of conscience intended as an alternative to the poetical vision of human behavior. The new philosophical concept of conscience was based upon an axiological behavior called ethos. I also coin (in part 4) a concept of the ‛community of conscience’ where I distinguish four ‛aspects of solidarity’ in conscience, namely, somebody’s own self, a group of significant persons, a group of the same moral principles, and a sameness of life. In the end I turn (in part 5) to a historical-literary case in Joseph Conrad’s last novel The Rover (1923), which provoked a lively discussion among Polish authors and seems useful as an illustration of several levels of ‛solidarity of conscience’.

Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Łukasz Kowalik
ORCID: ORCID

Czym jest solidarność ekologiczna? Badanie perspektywy obrońców rzek w Polsce

Adela Malak Marianna Strzelecka Joanna Tusznio
Studia Socjologiczne | 2024 | No 1 | 107-129 | DOI: 10.24425/sts.2024.149318
Keywords wartości relacyjne więź człowiek - rzeka solidarność ekologiczna troska o rzeki działania zbiorowe
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Artykuł podejmuje problematykę solidarności ekologicznej jako przejawu wartości relacyjnej z rzekami. Obecne w literaturze rozważania teoretyczne nie zostały dotąd poparte wynikami badań empirycznych. Wkładem pracy w rozwój socjologii środowiska jest zatem empiryczne zbadanie przejawów solidarności ekologicznej jako wartości relacyjnej oraz weryfikacja założeń teoretycznych na jej temat, a także wytyczenie kierunków dalszej operacjonalizacji tego pojęcia w badaniach społecznych. Podstawą osiągnięcia wskazanego celu było przeprowadzenie eksploracyjnych wywiadów jakościowych z osobami zaangażowanymi w działania na rzecz rzek w Polsce. Wyniki badań pokazują, że wskazane w literaturze trzy wymiary solidarności ekologicznej są współzależne, a wspólnie mogą motywować do działania na rzecz rzek. Zrozumienie współczesnego charakteru relacji człowieka z rzekami oraz czynników kształtujących te relacje wydaje się kluczowe dla projektowania adekwatnych rozwiązań problemów dotykających ekosystemy rzeczne w Polsce.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Anderson, Elisabeth P., Sue Jackson, Rebecca E. Tharme i in. 2019. Understanding rivers and their social relations: A critical step to advance environmental water management. WIREs Water, 6: e1381. DOI: 10.1002/wat2.1381.
  2. Arias-Arévalo, Paola, Berta Martin-López, Erik Gómez-Baggethun. 2017. Exploring intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values for sustainable management of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 22, 4: 43. DOI: 10.5751/ES-09812220443.
  3. Arias-Arévalo, Paola, Erik Gómez-Baggethun, Berta Martin-López, Mario Pérez-Rincón. 2018. Widening the Evaluative Space for Ecosystem Services: A Taxonomy of Plural Values and Valuation Methods. Environmental Values, 27, 1: 29-53. DOI: 10.3197/096327118X15144698637513. 
  4. Bennett, Nathan J., Tara S. Whitty i in. 2018. Environmental Stewardship: A Conceptual Review and Analytical Framework. Environmental Management, 61, 1-2: 597-614. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-017-0993-2.
  5. Boelens, Rutgerd, Arturo Escobar i in. 2023. Riverhood: political ecologies of socionature commoning and translocal struggles for water justice. The Journal of PeasantStudies, 50, 3: 1125-1156. DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2022.2120810.
  6. Bińczyk, Ewa. 2022. Planetarna myśl społeczna oraz wystudzanie wzrostu. Studia Socjologiczne, 3, 246: 9-27. DOI: 10.24425/sts.2022.142632.
  7. Chan, Kai M.A., Patricia Balvanera i in. 2016. Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 113: 1462-1465. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1525002113.
  8. Chan, Kai M.A, Rachelle K. Gould, Unai Pascual. 2018. Relational values: what are they, and what’s the fuss about?. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 35: A1-A7. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.11.003.
  9. Cockburn, Jessica, Georgina Cundill i in. 2019. Collaborative stewardship in multifunctional landscapes: toward relational, pluralistic approaches. Ecology and Society, 24 4: 32. DOI: 10.5751/ES-11085-240432.
  10. De Vos, Alta, Bezerra Joana C., Roux Dirk. 2018. Relational values about nature in protected area research. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 35, 8999. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.018.
  11. Díaz, Sandra, Sebsebe Demissew i in. 2015. The IPBES conceptual framework - connecting nature and people. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14: 1-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002.
  12. Díaz, Sandra, Unai Pascual i in. 2018. Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Recognizing culture, and diverse sources of knowledge, can improve assessments. American Association for the Advancement of Science, 359, 6373: 270-272. DOI: 10.1126/science.aap8826.
  13. Flint, Courtney G., Bailey M. Holdaway, Caitlyn S. Rogers. 2023. Human-river relationships depend on human-human relationships: River and watershed organizations in three western US states. River Research and Applications. DOI: 10.1002/rra.4136.
  14. Folke, Carl, Stephen Polasky i in. 2021. Our future in the Anthropocene biosphere. Ambio, 50: 834-869. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-021-01544-8.
  15. Franklin, Adrian. 2017. The more-than-human city. The Sociological Review, 65, 2: 202 - 217. DOI: 10.1111/1467-954X.12396.
  16. Gonzalez-Jiménez, David, Uta Berghöfer i in. 2018. Beyond Measurements: Multiple values of nature and their diverse conceptualization. Technical Report.
  17. Gorczyca, Elżbieta, Joanna Wąs. 2021. Samoistna renaturyzacja rzek i potoków górskich. W: E. Gorczyca, A. Radecki-Pawlik, K. Krzemień, red. Procesy fluwialne a utrzymanie rzek i potoków górskich. Kraków: Instytut Geografii i Gospodarki Przestrzennej UJ, 393-414.
  18. Grubert, Emily. 2018. Relational values in environmental assessment: the social context of environmental impact. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 35, 100-107. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.020.
  19. Hagen, Eric J., Rachelle K. Gould. 2022. Relational values and empathy are closely connected: A study of residents of Vermont’s Winooski River watershed. Ecology&Society, 27, 3: 19. DOI: 10.5751/ES-13406-270319.
  20. Jager, Nicolas W., Edward Challies i in. 2016. Transforming European Water Governance? Participation and River Basin Management under the EU Water Framework Directive in 13 Member States. Water, 8, 4: 156. DOI: 10.3390/w8040156.
  21. Jennings, Bruce. 2015. Ecological Solidarity. Minding Nature, 8. 1.
  22. Klain, Sarah C., Paige Olmsted, Kai M.A. Chan, Terre Satterfield. 2017. Relational values resonate broadly and differently than intrinsic or instrumental values, or the New Ecological Paradigm. PLoS ONE, 12, 8: e0183962. DOI: 10.1371/journal. pone.0183962.
  23. Kleespies, Matthias W., Paul W. Dierkes. 2020. Exploring the construct of relational values: an empirical approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 209. DOI: 10.1111/ soc4.12303.
  24. Kowalczak, Piotr, Piotr Matczak, Lena Slavikova. 2013. Institutional Evolution in Water Management in the Czech Republic and Poland. International Journal of Water Governance, 1, 3-4: 307-322. DOI: 10.7564/13-IJWG8.
  25. Kramm, Matthias. 2020. When a river becomes a person. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 21, 4: 307-319. DOI: 10.1080/19452829.2020.1801610.
  26. Lidskog Rolf, Claire Waterton. 2016. Anthropocene - a cautious welcome from environmental sociology?. Environmental Sociology, 2, 4: 395-406. DOI: 10.1080/23251042.2016.1210841.
  27. Lockie, Stewart. 2017. A better Anthropocene?. Environmental Sociology, 3, 3: 167172. DOI: 10.1080/23251042.2017.1357096.
  28. Manfredo, Michael J., Tara L. Teel, Kimberly L. Henry. 2009. Linking Society and Environment: A Multilevel Model of Shifting Wildlife Value Orientations in the Western United States. Social Science Quarterly, 90: 407-427. DOI: 10.1111/j.15406237.2009.00624.x.
  29. Matczak, Piotr, Jakub Lewandowski i in. 2017. Doing more while remaining the same? Flood risk governance in Poland. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 11, 5. DOI: 10.1111/jfr3.12300.
  30. Mathevet, Raphaël, François Bousquet i in. 2018a. The concept of stewardship in sustainability science and conservation biology. Biological Conservation, 217: 363-370. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.10.015.
  31. Mathevet, Raphaël, François Bousquet i in. 2018b. Environmental stewardship and ecological solidarity: rethinking social-ecological interdependency and responsibility. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 31: 605-623. DOI: 10.1007/s10806-018-9749-0.
  32. Moyano-Fernandez, Cristian. 2022. Building ecological solidarity: rewilding practices as an example. Philosophies, 7, 4: 77. DOI: 10.3390/philosophies7040077 .
  33. Mould, Simon A., Kirstie A. Fryirs, Richard Howitt. 2020. The importance of relational values in river management: understanding enablers and barriers for effective participation. Ecology & Society, 25, 2: 17. DOI: 10.5751/ES-11505-250217. 
  34. Muradian, Roldan, Erik Gómez-Baggethun. 2021. Beyond ecosystem services and nature’s contributions: Is it time to leave utilitarian environmentalism behind? Ecological Economics, 185. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107038.
  35. Norgaard, Kari M. 2018. The sociological imagination in a time of climate change. Global and Planetary Change, 163: 171-176. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.09.018.
  36. O’Donnell, Erin L., Julia Talbot-Jones. 2018. Creating legal rights for rivers: lessons from Australia, New Zealand, and India. Ecology and Society, 23, 1: 7. DOI: 10.5751/ES-09854-230107.
  37. Pascual, Unai, Patricia Balvanera i in. 2017. Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26-27: 7-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006.
  38. Rabinowitz, Peter M., Marguerite Pappaioanou i in. 2018. A planetary vision for one health. BMJ Global Health, 3: e001137. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001137.
  39. Sanders, Benjamin, Sim Julius i in. 2018. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant., 52, 4:1893-1907. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8. Epub 2017 Sep 14. PMID: 29937585; PMCID: PMC5993836.
  40. Schultz, Paul W. 2002. Inclusion with Nature: The Psychology of Human-Nature Relations. In: P. Schmuck, W.P. Schultz, eds. Psychology of Sustainable Development. Boston MA: Springer, 61-78. DOI:10.1007/978-1-4615-0995-0_4 .
  41. Stâlhammar, Sanna, Henrik Thorén. 2019. Three perspectives on relational values of nature. Sustainability Science, 14: 1201-1212. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-019-00718-4.
  42. Strzelecka, Marianna, Solène Prince, B. Bynum Boley. 2023. Resident connection to nature and attitudes towards tourism: findings from three different rural nature tourism destinations in Poland. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 31, 3: 664-687. DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2021.1995399.
  43. Thompson, John D., Raphaël Mathevet i in. 2011. Ecological solidarity as a conceptual tool for rethinking ecological and social interdependence in conservation policy for protected areas and their surrounding landscape. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 334, 5-6: 412-419. DOI: 10.1016/j.crvi.2011.02.001.
  44. Tusznio, Joanna, Piotr Matczak i in. 2023. Rising to the Challenge? The State of the Art and Future Research Directions of Polish Environmental Sociology. Polish Sociological Review, 221, 1: 27-46. DOI: 10.26412/psr221.02.
  45. Tusznio, Joanna, Marianna Strzelecka. 2022a. Mourning Rivers: A Way of Negotiating the Future. Blue Papers, 1, 1: 77-87. DOI: 10.58981/bluepapers.2022.1.08.
  46. Tusznio, Joanna, Marianna Strzelecka. 2022b. Place Loss and Re-Negotiating Local Water Heritage: The Case of Sztoła River, Bukowno, Poland. Blue Papers, 1, 1: 129-137. DOI: 10.58981/bluepapers.2022.1.13.
  47. Tsing, Anna. 2013. More-than-Human Sociality. A Call for Critical Description. In: K. Hastrup, eds. Anthropology and Nature (1st ed.). New York: Routledge, 27-42. DOI: 10.4324/9780203795361.
  48. Urry, John. 2009. Sociology and Climate Change. The Sociological Review, 57, 2: 84-100. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2010.01887.x. 
  49. Wantzen, Karl M., eds. 2023. River Culture. Life as a dance to the rhythm of the waters. Paris: UNESCO Publishing, XIII + 901. DOI: 10.54677/HHMI3947.
  50. West, Simon, L. Jamila Haider i in. 2018. Stewardship, care and relational values. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 35, 30-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.008.
  51. WWF. 2022. Living Planet Report 2022 - Budowanie pozytywnej przyszłości w niepewnym świecie. R.E.A Almond, M. Grooten, et al. eds. WWF, Gland, Szwajcaria. https://www.wwf.pl/sites/default/files/inline-files/WWF%20Poland%20- -%20LPR_2022_PEŁNY_RAPORT_0.pdf. Dostęp: 13. 03. 2023.
  52. WWF. 2020. Zdrowe rzeki - recepta na zmianę klimatu. https://straznicy.wwf.pl/zdro- we-rzeki-recepta-na-zmiane-klimatu/. Dostęp: 13. 03. 2023.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Adela Malak
1
Marianna Strzelecka
1
Joanna Tusznio
2
  1. Uniwersytet Jagielloński
  2. Uniwersytet Jagieloński

The desirable heaviness of being. Solidarity’s nostalgia for heavy modernity in the times of crisis, 1980–81.

Piotr Perkowski
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 349-370 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142732
Keywords heavy modernity nostalgia late state socialism Eastern Europe Solidarity movement
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Late, unlike heavy, modernity until now has been devoid of any radical project for the future. It rather makes people use a rose‑tinted past to cope with future‑oriented anxieties. Solidarity’s desire for heavy modernity demonstrates that this sickness has been around for a long time. In what ways were the people of Solidarity nostalgic, and how did modernity’s global crisis reinvigorate the “desirable heaviness of being”? “The desirable heaviness of being” depicts the phenomenon of nostalgia for postwar heavy modernity within the early Solidarity movement. The theory of post‑socialist nostalgia highlights the importance of nostalgia for the future‑oriented past of heavy modernity in appraising the system during the Solidarity period. The interplay between Solidarity, late state socialism, and the crisis of heavy modernity exemplifies Eastern Europe’s interactions with globalising economies before and after 1989. The recollections of the August Strike as well as the Solidarity trade union’s programme provide examples for the longing. The links between state socialism and the global crisis of modernity shed light on current reasons for nostalgia, which may be of interest to “rescue history”.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Piotr Perkowski
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Uniwersytet Gdański

Umstrittene Gründungsmythen. Der Konflikt um die Deutungsmacht über „Solidarność“ und Runden Tisch

Dawid Mohr
Historie. Jahrbuch des Zentrums für Historische Forschung Berlin der Polnischen Akademie der Wissenschaften | 2021 | Folge 14 | 133-152 | DOI: 10.24425/historie.2021.140447
Keywords Conspiracy myths/theories (Verschwörungsmythen) Myths of establishment (Gründungsmythen) 1989 political myths interpretative authority (Deutungsmacht) Solidarność Lech Wałęsa mass media
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Founding myths constitute the substrate of national identities and political orders. Especially in times of political change, the significance of such myths becomes clear as conflicts develop around them, in which various political forces attempt to embed the power of interpretation of a founding event in their programmes. In Poland, this is clearly demonstrated by the continuing polarizing power of political camps around the founding myths of the Third Polish Republic: „Solidarność“ and the Round Table. For that reason, they attempt to personify them to a high degree in the person of Lech Wałęsa. As a representative example, his behaviour serves as a reference for the legitimation of the political programme of the struggling political forces. By using both, the narrative of traitor and hero as sources of reference, political action is justified because of the denial or recognition of the founding myths. The only unifying dogma is once again anticommunism.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Dawid Mohr

Polens spät- und postsozialistische Transformation als Abschied von der industriellen Moderne

Florian Peters
Historie. Jahrbuch des Zentrums für Historische Forschung Berlin der Polnischen Akademie der Wissenschaften | 2021 | Folge 14 | 43-70 | DOI: 10.24425/historie.2021.140444
Keywords Poland industrial modernity coal mining late socialism Solidarność 1980s production/consumption transformation market economy social imaginaries
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article discusses the question, to what extent the late and post- socialist transformation in Poland can be considered a key stage in the decline of industrial modernity. Setting out from the premise that state socialism constituted a paradigmatic version of industrial or high modernity, it addresses the major discursive rupture that preceded the regime change of 1989: While the workers’ mass movement of Solidarity had embraced political and social imagina-ries typical of industrial modernity in 1980/81, these came to be re-placed by new socio-economic and cultural frameworks by the end of the 1980s. By outlining the spectacular rise of informal trading, as well as the Polish and transnational input into the promotion of grassroot capitalism, the article indicates how Poland’s late and post-socialist transformation was intrinsically linked to the down-fall of industrial modernity and reflects on the historiographical po-tential of this approach.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Florian Peters
ORCID: ORCID

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more